@edrianraneses5864 We will get the proper Spider-Man 3 if everyone drops the Snyder cut mentality. Spider-Man 3 isn't getting another cut, but Sony 100% has the power to release what hasn't been on a future re-release. If we start thinking practically, it'll be a lot closer to becoming a reality.
@edrianraneses5864 Everyone already loves the first two film on their own as they are. Spider-Man 3 is the one people take most issue with. 2.1 was a nice little bonus but doesn't serve as a cut that offers any shift in the narrative like the Editor's Cut.
@@ONCICOLA No, this is a very common misconception. It was cut because it went over budget. The poles and skeleton were shot for reference and the shot of Peter struggling with the symbiote was specifically ordered by the marketing team for the 2006 CC trailer. It was decided that shots with the symbiote that had more story significance were finished and added, such as Peter's transformation or the church scene. The original ending went over budget and what scraps we have is all that truly exists.
![Человек-Паук 3: РЕЖИССЁРСКАЯ ВЕРСИЯ [ОБЗОР] ЧТО ВЫРЕЗАЛИ И ИЗМЕНИЛИ В ФИЛЬМЕ?](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1jSDdhBuZ0s/mqdefault.jpg)
Awesome job on the video. Great to see a new upload.
All I have to say is that this version of venom was legit creepy
@@squidapuss9448 A devil sick of sin. That's how I see him.
harry never came to help in the original
@Puffoom423 He did, he just wasn't very successful.
oh ok
This begs the question when are we gonna get a proper extended cut of Spider-Man 3?
@edrianraneses5864 We will get the proper Spider-Man 3 if everyone drops the Snyder cut mentality. Spider-Man 3 isn't getting another cut, but Sony 100% has the power to release what hasn't been on a future re-release. If we start thinking practically, it'll be a lot closer to becoming a reality.
@@MyNameIsC0baltBlu3 Yes but also potentially a Spiderman 1 extended cut as well
@@edrianraneses5864 It's not necessary.
@@MyNameIsC0baltBlu3 what do you mean?
@edrianraneses5864 Everyone already loves the first two film on their own as they are. Spider-Man 3 is the one people take most issue with. 2.1 was a nice little bonus but doesn't serve as a cut that offers any shift in the narrative like the Editor's Cut.
The reason this wasn’t the version we got was cuz it was seen as too disturbing for kids in the test audiences.
@@ONCICOLA No, this is a very common misconception. It was cut because it went over budget. The poles and skeleton were shot for reference and the shot of Peter struggling with the symbiote was specifically ordered by the marketing team for the 2006 CC trailer. It was decided that shots with the symbiote that had more story significance were finished and added, such as Peter's transformation or the church scene. The original ending went over budget and what scraps we have is all that truly exists.
But the black thing looks cute😂😂😂❤❤
Welcome back! Where have you been?
@@MightyCrane18 On the streets, unfortunately
What is the game in 1:33