Top 9 Bridge Cameras compared | Super zoom Cameras
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
- You can stay up to date with Matts latest work at www.mattgrange... - join the mailing list!
Check out the Nikon Expert Setup Guide: learn.mattgran...
/ _mattgranger
/ mattgranger
Check out all the options:
Best Value - BH Photo: bhpho.to/2ZCdlC7 | or Amazon worldwide: geni.us/gDkdqC
Best image quality: bhpho.to/2ZKH7oF | geni.us/2KWJwU
Stephs fave: bhpho.to/2ZD4FeM | geni.us/jEtcA
Best overall: bhpho.to/2ZKH7oF | geni.us/2KWJwU
Biggest zoom: bhpho.to/2ZBAa9h | geni.us/jcYRg
Worst quality: bhpho.to/2ZD4FeM | geni.us/jEtcA
Lens cleaning wipes: geni.us/y5AIpi
Shouldve thrown the Kodak in the ocean. Crap
Please add the names
If you're going to test bridge cameras, keep in mind that these cameras are used primarily for bird watching and travel, not portraits. They are meant to be used outdoors at base ISO 95% of the time. Therefore, as someone who has used bridge cameras since 2003, what I would want to see tested in a bridge camera comparison are factors like focus speed and accuracy, shutter lag, and macro capabilities.
I would also love to see a comparison of the Panasonic FZ300 with its low price point, weather sealing, fully articulating touchscreen, and f/2.8 constant aperture zoom and the much more expensive Sony RX10 mark IV. I'm not expecting the FZ300 to outperform the RX10, but I also wonder whether there is enough of a difference to justify spending four times as much for the Sony.
@@MPD90 Yeah, it's probably a bit of that and being stuck in a rut (portraiture) and failing to recognize that these cameras are for bird watching. They're made to get photos that you can use to identify birds in the field and prove that you saw something really rare without spending $15,000 on a 600 or 800mm lens and a full frame camera that you can't even handhold. They are also excellent for landscape photography and many of them are good for macro as well, but using them for portraiture is like trying to use a Phillips head screwdriver for a drill. You might get the job done, but that's about the least efficient tool for the job!
One of the most overlooked bridge cameras, and one I own, is the LUMIX FZ300. 25-600, constant f2.8 aperture. For any photographer that knows what they are doing, it's possible to get excellent images out of it.
Caleb Wilson Agreed! It hits a sweet spot in its category.
After comparing my dad's old FZ200 to my Panasonic G7 with a 100-300mm lens, I have to say I'm really impressed! No, it is not quite as good for low light performance, but when you consider that the close focusing distance and weather sealing, you really can't beat it for the price. In fact, I would argue that the FZ300 is the best beginner camera and the best value camera on the market, and this is coming from someone who doesn't own one. Just don't expect to make large prints with that 12 megapixel sensor!
Love Steph's background gestures in the studio. She's always fun to watch.
Yes , she has an endearing personality , and even that old bloke matt is good for a laugh sometimes :) .
I have the FZ1000 mark 1 and it's still going well. For general purpose kind of shooting, it's a great camera. I like the fact that it has the leaf-shutter built into the lens, so it can do hi-speed sync with any flash.
I have the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000, and am very happy with it. I took it on my trip to Australia last Spring because I didn't want to carry my Nikon D750 and an array of lenses. Not being a pro, I find the picture quality to be excellent for my purposes. I take a lot of closeups of flowers; it does quite well in its macro setting. If I want a particular spot to be very sharp, I use a sharpness tool in my processing software. Works great!
Me to I used DSLR's beforeand while they are the top of the line I don't like to carry lenses with me also the dust getting inside and so on I don't like them. Bridge gives you everything and they are getting better and better. I dream about Lumix FZ1000 by it is too expensive for me 😰 and I just got an old one FZ45 now in 2022 I'm happy with it better than nothing.👍
I've been shooting with the Sony RX10m4 for about 21 months now, growing my brand and getting paid gigs. Just did my first wedding and they were very pleased. I LOVE the video options and the slowmo, as you can see on my channel, and the picture qulity in bright sun with the long zoom compression is really really nice. Saving up for an A9 and some real glass, but I'll never sell my RX10m4 until the mark 5 comes out.
You forgot to mention the sensors on these cameras. The Sony and Panasonic have a 1" sensor and the others have a much smaller sensor.
I suspect your chances of a Kodak sponsorship might be in jeopardy.
Kodak don't need that trash, just stick to the Portra, and Tri X and im happy.
two things: 1 - you and Steph are the best duo out there (I've said this before) and 2 - your review was stellar and you should do this every year!
Steph is a gem.
What a delightful cheerful soul.
Her beautiful smile is infectious.
Stephanie Pham is a ham. ;-)
I confess, I stopped to look at this vid because of her, sad I know 😕
I know this is now 3 years old, but once again, you helped me out. I am looking for a camera for my sister and had 5 of the 7 in my own list. Your research and such are one again priceless! Thank you.
i definitely don't use or need such cameras (pro shoots) but I find it great that you also talk about this range of cameras! Not everyone needs a $3000 camera :)
I enjoy photography but don't feel the need or desire to spend $$$$ in order to satisfy that enjoyment. I just pick up my all in one bridge camera - now @ $1000. - and go.
@@rayjenkins2754 That being said for $1000 you can get much better than a bridge :D Get a used X-T20 with a great lens!
@@Innovate-pq9ci But You cannot do what You can do with the bridgecam on focallenghts. And it will not stay with the one lens!
Matt!! I have been watching for years and am only just getting around to commenting. I have learned sooo much from your channel. Thank you thank you thank you!
Great comparison! The good thing about the fz2500 is that you can reduce the noise reduction permanently, improving much the details.
I wish I could someday reach the level of happiness of that girl.
😂😂
If you can believe... You're halfway there
Yes me too. I'm not a particularly negative sad person but I don't know how some people are so bubbly and happy all the time.
You can, Jesus loves you and give him all your worries. He'll carry your burden
DRUGS....
I'm an owner - 3 yrs - of the Fz 2500 & really enjoy it's versatility and ease of use. Yes, the Sony image quality is a bit better but getting through the ' Neanderthal ' menu system & still not having an integrated touch screen . . . well if you'd use the Fz for a while - it has 12 programmable function buttons ( 5 soft ones on the right edge of the monitor ) with it's easy to use menu sys that is touch integrated and then switched to the Sony - no ND filters & is heavier - I think you would chose to go back to the Fz. Enjoyed the video but could have been a bit more in depth. Thanks
This was the best entertaining and usefull comparison of bridge cameras so far. I had a sony bridge camera years ago (2005), which lasted a long time and at that year it was the best. Nowadays I'm using my phone, but am looking for a good bridge camera... after 15 years, I might go for a Sony again. Compliments to you and Steph... she's so much fun and cute as well...
Have had Sony RX10M4 and P1000 for a while now, love em both, definitely used for different scenarios, RX10M4 all quality and handy slomo @120 fps with sound, most useful upgrade from P900 to P1000 is RAW, bird and wildlife photography for anybody now...
Big LOL @ "I might be a panzy, but I have momentum" Onya mate, love the effort and the humor, cheers.
The RX10iv is worth every penny. Shots are sharp, and I can track surfers all over the place! (I used to use the Nikon D900 which was OK. Tried the D1000 but not impressed with its image quality) For traveling the RX10iv cannot be beat.
What about the weight of the RX10iv? It is the heaviest of all that Matt compared, right? I think it comes in at 2.5 lbs?
Thank you, very informative! Why didnt you test the FZ300/330, canon SX60 which has a shoe on it, FZ280?
This is great information for those interested in these types of cameras. I know a number of people who have them and they do just what they need.
That's the goal - cheers
You should review the Nikon P1000 in the category "Telescopes with sensors"
I decided on the Lumix FZ80, I like the long zoom and the low price
I have a Panasonic FZ100 that I bought used for $350. It is light, has a ton of features, can take great photos and video. I've been surprised at the image quality that can be achieved with this camera. I reserve my Sony cameras for serious work but grab the FZ1000 for casual shooting. Super value. I set out looking for a zoom with a 1" sensor for under $400 to use on our boat. It's not water sealed or drop proof but it's cheap and does the job.
The best part of this video is … this beautiful presentable girl❤️ loved her smile.. hope she is doing well🙂
Thank you for that. A very good review.
Although each is a long lens camera, that doesn't mean capturing distant objects through haze.
A lot of photographers automatically associate long lenses with wildlife shots especially birds.
I need the 3000mm in my small backyard. Because I photograph small birds and they are usually in trees.
"This one doesn't have a traditional aperture dial, it's on the lens" .... oooh youngsters.
lol :D
Loool. +1
When Olympus added shutter speed control to their lenses I switched from Minolta.
This is great! Never seen any of your stuff before. Fun presentation, very concise talking points while being very detailed. Thanks!
One thing that I would like to have seen explored is the difference in sensor size. Cameras like the Canon SX70HS have a tiny sensor that is going to show noise in anything but optimal conditions. I have one and it is good on a sunny day but that's about it. Given great conditions I shot it against a Canon EOS 7DII with the 100-400MkII+1.4xMkIII extender. I challenged anyone using a screen to tell me which was better and the results were slightly in favour of the PowerShot! But it quickly showed noise when the light dropped. Also, a lot depends on what you do with the images. If one is going to make anything much over 6x4, then the smaller sensors will start to fail, on a screen you have more tolerance. So for me, if I was going to shoot an all-in-one super zoom I would want a 1" sensor for the image quality. That narrowed down the pack considerably.
In that context, one other super-zoom camera I was surprised was not evaluated was the Canon PowerShot G3X - 1" sensor, IS, 24-600 Equivalent FoV and environmentally sealed (without the EV). FWIW, I have one and knew from the beginning that to use the zoom at its full extent I would need to get the optional and expensive EVF. Doing so removes access to the flash - although if you are using it at a long zoom you are unlikely to use a flash anyway, but it added considerable bulk to the camera. In the end I am selling it and would consider the Sony as a potential replacement for an all-in-one unit. Absolutely of the group, it seemed the best all round unit.
I have two of them. The Nikon P1000 and the Sony RX10 IV. The Nikon I only use when I need this incredible zoom. For wild life at example. The RX10 is my allrounder. Especially the autofocus is great. Also I have a Sony a7s. This is my camera if its get darker or I want some bokeh.
Same same, but have a X-T3 instead of a7, but agree RX10m4 is greatallrounder
Same for me plus the Canon EOS R6 for A/F. But I hate using it after the other two.
I have the p1000 and it's just a great fun camera for video, especially on the go there's pretty much no replacement for the reach in these bridge cameras. It is not a serious camera category, but it's an awesome toy and i love it
Panasonic fz1000, I am happy with the image quality so far. My research prior to buying indicated quality similar to Sony, but with less native sharpening.
Switched from the fz1000 to the Sony rx10m4
interesting video. as a Sony rx10 iv user, I'm not really surprised. like you suggest, it's not cheap, but it's often quite usable. when a bridge camera works, I kinda like the Sony - even though I am not a Sony fan overall. thumbs up on your video. enjoyed.
I had the Nikon P1000 for about a week, but returned it just this morning, and bought the Sony RX10 IV. While I drooled over the Sony, I really didn’t want to spend the extra money for it-but I ended up biting the bullet. While I did get some great shots of backyard birds with the Nikon (the photo can be framed so well that no post cropping is needed), it was VERY cumbersome and VERY difficult to auto focus, as it kept hunting...and forget manual focus-way too slow and persnickety. I was also turned off by the poor low-light noise. I have a grandchild coming in early Oct, and I’m thinking the Sony wins out over the Nikon hands down. I enjoyed your reviews!
I love my Sony RX10 IV for the reasons shown. I travel a lot and the ease of using an all in one far out shines the need to get "the perfect" image afforded by very expensive lenses. You forgot to mention that it shoots as 24 frames for second for getting those crazy action shots.
It does Dale, but takes a while to clear the buffer, however does work well @ 24 fps til it fills it up, some fantastic shots.
I enjoy using the Lumix FZ330 and have done for about 6 months or so. I know a bridge camera has it's limitations and I have to work with those, but certainly for now it suits my needs extremely well. I'm disabled so carrying half a dozen lenses with me with a DSLR or mirrorless body is simply impractical. I'm a 'mere hobbyist' anyway so I don't really need 'the best of the best'.
I tested my dad's FZ200 against my Panasonic G7 with the Panasonic 100-300mm lens, both at 600mm full frame equivalent, and while the G7 was better, we're only talking about a stop or less in terms of low light performance. Focus speed in the FZ200 was slower as well, but for less than half the price, I couldn't complain too much and the FZ300 may be better in that respect. It makes me wonder how it compares to the Sony RX10 Mark IV.
@@keithholland4322 I think the RX10 Mark IV is 'the dog's whatsits! I would've loved it but it was a bit out of my price range! I never tried it but I would hazard a guess that the differences are still only minor.
@@ashstubbings2603 I expect you're right for non-professional use. The biggest advantages I would expect to see are obviously more megapixels, which equates to larger print sizes, better low light performance thanks to the newer, larger sensor, and better autofocus, especially for tracking fast-moving subjects like dogs, horses, birds in flight, or sports. If I had the money, I would love to have it, mostly because I could make bigger prints with it, but I just don't have the money for any sort of a new bridge camera right now, so I'm just going to have to get by with my m4/3 cameras, Nikon B700, and Panasonic ZS50.
In 2024 I'm still using my Canon SX50 HS (50x) and Fuji S9900W (50x) and I'm pretty happy with that. P.S I'd recommend using a $3 lanyard or $5 hand strap with any $500+ camera. You two were making me nervous just watching you handle those cameras.
I use Nikon P900 and it is good in daylight. For moon shots it is great. It is a travel camera, light and versatile. Don't compare it with a DSLR. I would recommend a used Nikon D700 with a Tokina 100mm f/2.8 for portraits. That combination is amazing. That would be within the budget of these cameras but of course no zoom. We buy these mega zoom cameras for the reach, especially if you want to shoot pictures of a lunar eclipse.
Started out with a bridge camera like these, so I have a soft spot for them :). Some people look down at them, but I think they are great cameras to start out with, just because they are so versatile. Also a great option if you need to have a lot of reach on the long end, in a very small package. Loved the video. Poor Kodak... Do you guys know Calimero? The Kodak reminded me of that...
Yes they are very versatile mate if you get a half decent one ( but perhaps not the Kodak :) ? ).
A while ago i took out my P600 to spot on a map picked randomly overlooking the bay just for the hell of it ,
i got to this spot , and to the naked eye it looked like crap in every direction , i could see almost nothing on or across the bay or on the forshore , then i cranked open the zoom , and holy beezwax , just amazing what my little P600 could bring into view and get a shot of .
Given from memory it cost me 700 Australian , its a cool little travel camera imo , of course , you will not get a $ 4000 dollar FF camera Quality pic out of it , but still i like it . .
I have panasonic fz300, I use because is lightweight to take photo and video.
Such an underrated bridge cam.
The FZ300 is a great all ‘rounder. Panasonic leads with their UI and handling.📷👍🏻
I also have the FZ300. I have it in my backpack all the time. Shoots great video and really nice stills if it's set up correctly.
I bet I could get better sharpness with the FZ1000m2 and the FZ2500 if I had 30 minutes with them to adjust the settings. In "factory" condition, the images are pretty soft, but you can bring out the sharpness with a little effort in the menu.
Nice video! I enjoyed it.
Best value camera on the market!
Best deal in town
I was tempted to buy a bridge camera to replace my aging and failing canon DSLR. But all of these cameras, while having a great zoom range, don't shoot wide enough for me. So I am back at the DSLR camp. Great video by the way.
Nice video and assessment - totally get it. (What I do not get is the counting: 9 in the title and 7 in the video.) Considering how big these bridge cameras are, I feel they should be directly compared with APS-C cameras in the same ballpark. A couple examples with B&H prices: All APS-C cameras. Mirrorless: Sony Alpha a6500 & 18-135mm - 24.2MP - $1,598. FUJIFILM X-T30 & 15-45mm & 23mm f/2 - 26.1MP - $1,448. FUJIFILM X-T30 & 18-55mm Lens - 26.1MP - $1,299. Sony Alpha a6400 & 18-135mm - 24.2MP - $1,298. Canon EOS M5 & 18-150mm - 24.2MP - $1,198.50. Canon EOS M6 & 18-150mm & Electronic Viewfinder - 24.2MP - $1,137.25. DSLR: Nikon D7500 & 18-140mm - 20.9MP - $1,531. Nikon D7500 & 18-300mm - 20.9MP - $1,526.95. Nikon D500 & 16-80mm - 20.9MP - $2,096.95. How would one of these compare? Size? Weight? Image quality? And they all have a full -auto setting, right?
...most informative regarding such a comparison. I will now consider bridge cameras much more seriously. I’m thinking-I like interchangeable lenses but not the escalating prices. I could lessen my camera gear, learn one camera completely and not think about or see reviews on lenses I can never justify buying. And, with these cameras I can still shoot in manual to maintain my creativity. Thanks Matt...I must seriously give this some thought. ...I do need to research which ones include an external mic input & HDMI out. Be well.
Brilliant video. I reckon you probably still have some way to go learning how to be a model :-). I have the Sony RX10iv. It's been an absolute winner for me. Yes it can't match my D850. But it goes places offering 24mm to 600mm that my D850 can't.
I have long heard that although the Panasonic FZ1000/FZ1000 II are identical twins to the Leica V-Lux Typ 114/V-Lux 5, respectively, I am glad to hear (beginning at 24:00) that their outputs are indeed DIFFERENT. I also like the Leica's color and image processing better.
I may have missed it, but I don't think I heard you mention the sensor size on these. For example, the Sony has a 1" sensor, which is 4 times the Nikon P1000, which explains the image quality, and the price difference. I'm surprised that prices seems to match sensor size so closely, but they do still seem to a bit.
I use a Panasonic FZ1000 just to shoot Classic Ballet perfomances insted of my D750 because you never miss the shot...Dancers, ballet schools, teachers are more interested in dance technic exact moment , more than a crisp image in a bad moment...my Pany do the job very well and weigh almost nothing compared with D750 suited with 70-200 2.8 and battery grip...no matter if I use a monopod...you have to struggle with it during a 1200 shoots Swan Lake perfomance.
You gotta love Step with the Kodak camera , imagine Matt had brought old nokia phone with samiliar sounds xD
Thank you friend for the honest review. Too many conflicting reviews but loved your honesty. This video made me frustrated. I’m a beginner in photography and was hoping for a better review, but after seeing your video, I will not purchase any of the cameras tested and the Sony is too expensive. I’m assuming that a bridge camera will not be a good choice and it’s better to buy a DSLR camera instead. Please make a video of DSLR cameras that you consider good cameras with a budget friendly audience in mind
Can’t believe you missed the lumix fz300/330 goes all the way out to 600mm and f2.8 constant aperture and a little dust and weather sealed for about 400€ . In the usable range for wildlife it’s tops. The Sony maybe a bit above it but it would want to be 4 times better for the price which it’s not.
I do love my Sony, and I have the mark iii
Nice style of presentation..and the Girl omg is so cute😊😊
Thank you for the interresting test.
AND both of you acted cute and funny.
It was very nice to watch this video.
Witch camera to buy? Well, it depends on the budget.
If you live in Salem, MA, you'll know WHICH camera to buy - the witchy one...
I have been using the Sony RX series for few years now. They have a larger sensor combined with a Zeiss lens. It proved to be a very reliable camera EXCEPT it uses the old Sony batteries which are bad. Take at least 4 with you if you are traveling..!!
Thank you for the interesting comparison. People on a tight budget should also consider the Lumix FZ1000 (Mk1) which is available for below USD 500 and is basically the Leica for the Canon price.
I have the P900 and find it way to difficult to hold or even refind the lost subject for those way zoomed out attempts.. I still own a my old Nikon F with fixed focal very fast 28mm, 50mm and 105mm lens set.. These old guys provide image quality unsurpassed even though I am required to physically focus each shot.. As a pro am photog of yesteryear those lost days are still remembered and cherished... The P900 purchase was a mistake in judgement and should have stayed with my pocket Canon and Sony point and shooters.. I was taken with the super zoom offered by the P900 and did not use good judgement.. But we all do those things occasionally and forgot for a moment that I have become just another senior occasional picture taker that should use his energy on overall lighting of my individual antique pieces. You do a great professional job with your RUclips offerings, I enjoyed your crisp very legible and to the point video.. THANKS MUCH and have a wonderful day...
A good subjective group test from a pro dslr user, I'm pleased you mention taking close ups with a phone, because that's all they're only really good at (sensor handicap), I've often switched between Dslr (Sony and Nikon) and Bridge Camera's, my issue with Dslrs is that with best intentions you intend to stick to just 2-3 lenses but can't, and usually end up with at least double that, and when you want to go anywhere what lenses do you take and quite often you don't have the right lens mounted for a specific shot, e.g taking a macro shot when an eagle flies over, a dslr's image quality and bokeh etc are without question and a lot of dslr users do frown at bridge cameras, however I think you'll agree the Fz2500 and Rx10 push hard.
@ 20:48 - the doll is cool ...
@ 4:26 - she make a right move !!!
Thanks for the review. I find superzooms really interesting options as bring everywhere cameras, and I rarely find reviews/videos that compare that many models. Here's some comments regarding the models in the video. It's not meant to contradict the findings in the video, but maybe give some additional and useful info.
The Leica V-Lux (114) is a rebranded Panasonic FZ1000. The recently launched Leica V-Lux 5 (not in the test) is a rebranded FZ1000 Mk II. FZ2500 is a "for video" optimzed camera with a bit more zoom than FZ1000, but unfortunately not as sharp lens (source, Dpreview ++).
In tests the FZ1000 lens and the RX10 IV lens test very similar for resolution in the common zoom range (source, Dpreview ++), but the RX10 IV (and III) lens is slightly faster and have longer reach.
All these use some version of Sony's one inch sensor, FZ1000/V-LUX (114) the oldest version. The others (probably) a newer one that performs basically the same on high ISO and slightly better than the first generation. Of course, the results when shooting JPG depends on the camera settings and the manufacturer's algorithms. Shooting RAW would yield pretty much the same results for noise when shot at the same ISO and processed the same. Total IQ obviously also depends on lens quality.
The Canon, Nikon and Kodak all use 1/2.3" sensors. Expectations (at least for Canon and Nikon) would be similar high ISO performance when RAW is used and image is scaled to the same size.
Hi
Okay mate, this girls personality must be contagious I’ve never seen you so happy you obviously LIKE her
Used to use a Canon SX50 HS. Kind of thinking about getting it converted to full spectrum to see if I might want to grab a cheap used a6000 and get that converted.
I have had a Fuji finepix s1 with 50x zoom for quite some years and I’m really satisfied with the image quality in spite of the minimal size sensor.
Thanks for the review, seems like a lot of work but fun none the less. Regarding the FZ1000m2 smoothing, did you adjust in camera sharpness or noise reduction? I can understand testing at factory preset levels as a base line but using the features of the camera like exposure comp or noise reduction to suit taste can be part of testing too, and will showcase the capability of the instrument even better. Perhaps the Kodak too has an un-suck feature (jk).
Thanks-nice job!
The Canon Powershot SX70 is good.
Scenery Modes are great for noise reduction.
1.6x and 2.0x Converter is built in.
I Nice comparison. I was hoping
you included the Fuji x100f.
Thank you for your excellent explanation of each of the ten point & shoot telephoto cameras on the market. Your side kick was entertaining as well.
The Leica is in fact the Mark 1 version of the panasonic fz1000
Thanks for the rundown. Which one would you recommend for wildlife pics at ranges of 100 yards plus?
Also, was there one that was noticeably quieter to use?
Not the Kodak, obviously...it would run off every deer in the county.
Sony RX10 mark III or iv is suitable for wildlife photography but its pricey other options are Canon G3X Panasonic FZ2000. All these cameras has 1 inch sensor so you will get decent image quality. For more zoom but lower in image quality specially in low light you can go for Panasonic FZ70, Panasonic FZ80 etc
great video! I had to come back and watch again
Many thanks for this useful video. I get asked a lot about a good camera in the £500 range so this is useful to know. How about this:would you recommend an APS-C camera with a stock lens (like most casual buyers end up doing and never buying another lens) or one of these bridge cameras? I mean do their built in lenses have better optics than the stock APS-C lenses to compensate for the smaller sensor or will the bigger sensor still trump?
I thought I'd check the link for the 600 lens wipes, and it seems they've had a little price hike on the Australian amazon site. I know our dollar is in the toilet, but they're not $20 anymore, they're now $427...
Hello Matt, the bridge camera that I have... since 2013, is the Fujifilm Finepix HS35 EXR. I am surprised that you didn't have any Fujis in the lineup... but I don't know if they make bridge cameras anymore... anyway... it has a 24-720mm equiv. focal range (30x optical zoom) f/2.8 at the wide end and f/5.6 at the long end... The thing I love the most about it is the fact that it has a manual zoom ring like dslr/mirrorless lenses. you don't zoom by using a button or so, you must turn the ring to zoom... most bridge cameras don't offer that.... I also like the long zoom range, it's light, small, has raw shooting, full manual mode, in good light the images are wonderfull,.. The things I hate the most about it are the low light performance which is really bad and the lens flare... You can use it well if you are looking for that effect (I got some great shots like that pi posing a model with the sun behind or above), but if you aren't looking for that, well... you can't avoid it unless you get rid of the light sources in your shot.... If I am shooting at night, for example, btight street lights produce really ugly flares around them... anyway, a good camera for the rice I bought it for, it holds up great after all these years, although I don't shoot it as much since I started using DSLRs... How about you, Matt, have you ever used this model or a bridge camera from Fujifilm? If so, I would like your thoughts. Thanks. Have a nice day.
Hi Mat did you do a comparison in video test? Difference in rolling shutter too.
I'm glad I found this video. I currently own an fz1000 for 3 years and it has served really well. So looking to buy a second one for action sports
Really great video, been looking into some of these for a few weeks now and confirmed what I've found. Will have to spend the extra. Unless you can recommend a very lightweight 400mm lens for a APS-C Canon DSLR for the same or less money. Thanks again for the Video.
I’ve been using an old Fujifilm S2000, the image quality is a joke, but I really like the fact that it’s all in one. Would like something with a faster lens though.
I use Nikon P1000 for long distance bird/ wild life shooting, as well as, photos of Jupiter Saturn and the Moon. Everything else, and everyday shooting, I use a Sony A7III with a LAEA4 adapter with a Minolta Maxxum 100mm-300mm lens, 50mm F1.7, and 28 f2.8. On occasion I will use Sony's kit lens 28mm-70mm for portraits or fast moving objects and children due its faster autofocus over the Minolta lenses.
I recently owned the FZ1000 for a year and looking at the RX10 Mkiv. The FZ1000 was a great introduction into the "1" Bridge Camera Market. Pictures were too soft especially in Macro.
I'm amazed at this comment. FZ1000 for macro ...*+&$#...
Thank you for your review, it was most helpful. I own the Leica V-Lux and am quite happy with it. I have a Bachelor's in Photography from the Jurassic period of film. I will never forget printing from a 4X5 negative just to see that incredible resolution in a print. I've been a sharpness junky ever since. I no longer shoot professionally, but I still want a camera with acceptable results. I love my V-lux and a side of having to take off my UV filter at 25mm it is a great piece of gear. My job allows me to go into Yellowstone Park frequently and a maximum of 400 mm does not cut it for wild life photography, so I made the worst decision of 2020 by buying the Nikon P1000. The sharpness quality is mediocre at best with the same focal length as the Leica. I am now looking at the Sony RX-10 IV. Other reviewers have come up with the same conclusion that the Sony is the best in the Bridge Camera format and it gets me to 600 mm which is realistically about as far as you can go hand holding the camera. I even shot the Nikon on a sturdy Bogen tripod with little improvement in sharpness. I hope this was helpful. All the best.
Thanx for comparing these cameras 📷, I have a canon sx70 cybershot and it's great for long walks and taking pictures of little birds ,wildlife, nature etc. But it's not the best camera for making portraits of people and it's terrible indoors with not much light. Concerts and stuff. If I should want to by a camera that take better and sharper pictures indoors. But in the same price range. Wich camera should I buy, a Panasonic?
Great review. I do love my Sony RX10IV
Great review thanks.
One great use for these bridge cameras is getting into birding on a budget. Plus they're easy to move around with without a big fixed lense on the front of a DSLR. I'm just starting out and getting good results with a Canon SX540 HS I picked up 2nd hand. Looking to upgrade to the SX70, or possibly the Nikon P950, which some reviews rate over the P1000.
Wow, such a great review! Thank you so much!
After watching the entire video (great video) I was only able to afford the lens wipes :)
I hope you let Steph keep the Kodak as it just melted her.
she's such a beautiful model love her hair and teeth
May I ask what microphone system do you use. Sounds amazing and not much back noise
Thank you Mr Granger
Great review and effort
Great job Matt, very usefull
the main reason I like these is one and only one, no dust on the sensor, unlike my DSLR and Micro 4/3rds camera. I'll be looking for another camera and will be looking at a bridge camera, my old Fuji has served me very well and love it's macro/super macro ability, it is only let down by low light performance but it is about 13-14 years old!
In extreme enough situations, dust can still get in. I’ve seen it with guests in Mongolia and Namibia. FYI
@@mattgranger I am even gladder now I live in England ;-) All the best.
Why didn't the Nikon DL 24-500 participate in the test?
I would like to know which one is best for video and are camcorders any better. I'm only
talking about video.
Awesome video love the Canon I am using SX740 for beginner Aviation Videos
Should have added a base dslr d3500 or d5600 with 18-400mm
Dude, where did you get that shirt!? I got mine during a trip to Portugal
Any opinions about the magical clear zoom image of Sony able to get in full hd picture mode a powerful x75 zoom ?
thanks for the video. I am an airline pilot looking for a compact (or SMALL bridge) camera with good optical zoom to shoot 90% of time in bright and shaky or vibrating conditions, but would appreciate a night mode to shoot polar Auroras if i see some. What would you recommend in this selection or another model less than 600/700€ ? used to have a Lumix Bridge 12 years ago but was shooting nowadays from my iphone, but lacking a good optical zoom... had great expectations from iphone 12Pro but they went on with X2 zoom so i want a real camera ! thanks for your kind answer !
Other than the zoom all of the 1/2.3" sensor variety bridge cameras produce images no better than most mid level to high end smartphones these days. The 1" variants however ( so the Sony, Lumix and Leica cameras here ) fair a lot better. I own both the Canon GX9 and Lumix TS100, both using 1" sensors and their image quality is overall very good. Anybody considering a bridge camera today should only shortlist those featuring a 1" sensor and forget the rest in my opinion.
1/2.3" sensor bridge cameras, with the notable exception of the Panasonic Lumix FZ300, are designed to be used primarily for bird watching. As such, a focal length of less than 600mm full frame equivalent is practically useless and 1,200mm or more is ideal. These cameras are meant to be used outdoors at base ISO with image stabilization sufficient to permit handheld shooting at extreme focal lengths. Sadly, there are no 1" sensor bridge cameras with a focal length longer than 600mm, so there is certainly a case to be made for the 1/2.3" sensor cameras with a bit more reach. If you go to a park or an Audubon sanctuary sometime, you'll probably find that the most popular cameras are 1/2.3" sensor bridge cameras for this reason. While you might see someone with a DSLR and a 600mm lens or a micro four thirds camera with a 100-300mm lens, you'll probably see more 1/2.3" sensor bridge cameras than anything else.
@@MPD90 Actually, the IQ on the Nikon P1000 is not all that bad at 2,000mm equivalent. Sure, you would probably get better image quality from a Nikon 800mm f/5.6 or Olympus 150-400mm f/4.5 with the 1.25x built-in teleconverter plus a 2x, but it costs a fraction of the price and in bright light, it's probably very usable for identifying birds in a marsh, for instance.
Are bridge cameras good for stock photography. My main concern is noise since at least shutter stock will not tolerate any noise.