The real Interstellar: space travel theories
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024
- ♺ DETAILS
__________________________________
All the way back in 1911, Russian rocket scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky created the first technical outline of an interstellar rocket. Here is what he wrote about it: “…If it were possible to sufficiently speed up the decay of radium and other radioactive solids, as all solids, perhaps, we could create such reactive power that the trip to the nearest sun (star) could be shortened to 10-40 years. In that case, a rocket weighing a tonne could completely clear the solar system using just a pinch of radium. (The real Interstellar: space travel theories)
♺ Our Channels:
__________________________________
● Evil Space - / @deepevilspace
● Espacio Profundo - / @espacioprofundo
● Raumfahrt - / @raumfahrt_
● Space Voyage - / @space-voyage
● L'ère de l'espace - / @_espace
● Voyage spatial - / @voyage_spatial
● Weltraumreise - / @weltraumreise
● Space Journey - / @spacejourney_
● Space Age - / @spaceiseternal
● Weltraumzeitalter - / @viagemespacial
● La era Espacial - / @perjalananluarangkasa...
● Злой Космос - / @roiin
♺ ANIMATION:
__________________________________
Jeremy jozwik: www.artstation....
Egor Demin: www.artstation...
Darth Biomech www.artstation...
Fish tree www.deviantart...
Ken York of YD Visual / ydvisual
Kristiityan Tavkar www.miragedere...
Chris Holland (Mafic Studios) www.maficstudios.com
LegionTech Studio
Kris Holland of Mafic Stufios: www.maficstudios.com
Sergio Boterio https: www.artstation...
Bryan Versteeg spacehabs.com
Andrew Carter Animation: / @andrewcarteranimation
• Atmospherical Beings |...
Keith Carson, Jarred Eagley, Udo Schroeter, Mihail Yordanov,
Katie Byrne, Edward Nardella, Jarred Eagley, Justin Dixon,
Misho Yordanov, Pierre Demet. Stefan Blandin.
♺ SOURCES:
__________________________________
www.sciencefoc...
www.johnagowan....
www.scienceand...
neuroquantolog...
lithub.com/the...
♺ TAGS:
__________________________________
#Interstellar #space #travel #monsters #documentary #space #mars #perseverance #habitableplanets #planets #aliens #documentary #movie #earth #nuclear #bomb #weapons #space #documentary #universe #pulsars #neutron #stars #Voyagers #nasa #mathematics #ufo #aliens #monsters #Earth #core #planet #Film #civilization #future #Universe #submarine #Universe #spacetime #Jupiter #Otherworlds #Research #Evilspace exploration #Sciencepop #Mission #Astronomy #Canalcosmos #Travel
♺ CONTACT:
__________________________________
E-MAIL: evilstarbox@gmail.com
This is all academic. There is one crucial scientific breakthrough required for us to expand throughout our galaxy. And it would change almost everything else about human existence. We need to be able to upload our entire consciousness into a memory device which is both spacious enough and fast enough to match or exceed the human brain. Once that is done, EVERYTHING CHANGES. We can live forever. We won’t need food or water. We could travel anywhere, instantly. We can load ourselves onto a spacecraft that could take 50,000 years to travel across the stars and shut down during the long cruise periods and when we start up it would feel like a second went by after thousands of years. No need to carry food or maintain cumbersome space greenhouses, no need for artificial gravity, (we wouldn’t weigh anything) except when we desired we could manufacture robotic bodies for mobility and human like interaction.
We just need to let go of these frail bags of mostly water we need to exist. Then anything is possible.
Not happening anytime soon! Even if it was possible would you really want to live forever? The more I think about it the more I wonder if we live in a simulation. It is far fetched but if true we are already doing your idea.
@@johnjay6370 well it would not necessarily mean living forever. It would be living either for as long as you WISH to live, or if you run out of energy.
Who says this life is not just a K5 civilizations training program or video game.
I beg to differ on what the "breakthrough" is for mankind to expand throughout our solar system/galaxy......the production and control of dark matter can propel us near* the speed of light. Without dark matter it doesn't matter what technology we have, we aren't going anywhere quickly.
@@commoncents9732 *near the speed of light is way too slow. But you’re entitled to your opinion.
If we sent a generational ship to a system that would take 100 years of travel.
Technology would advance so much so in that time that we could build a ship and send it to the same destination, and it would make it to the system before the generational ship. That's why I dont think it's viable.
It's nice, but what's with the crappy loud progressive rock guitar noise?
The narrator drive me crazy. "So out here we have SPACE and ITS really DARK" - I can't really mimic what I'm here with text but it makes it hard to pay attention to anything else that his bizarre timing - he has an oddball dysrythymic cadence.
#spacerock 😉
It's called dubstep... 👽
@@jordanalwanger1993lol 😂 (I haven't heard a dubstep diss in a while...I still think about that South Park farting-sound episode when I think about dubstep...)
Did not like the background noise though content was good..u messed up bud
awesomely done
By the time humanity can field a generation starship, we will have probably developed radical life extension by the time it is launched into the void. If the crew of an interstellar starship can live indefinitely, the galaxy becomes that much smaller?
The idea of using a ship to travel across large distances of space is so mentally limited. We wont need ships by the time technology evolves.
the 76 reel film that started his heart and made him pucker up.
There are many theories about different planetary systems with different types of environments that are suitable or not in the expanding universe in farther far distances in nature.
Without question, we will never be able to get even remotely to the closest star. It would take somewhere around 6,000 Years just to get to the nearest star from our solar system. It's not gonna happen.
Bro you can't even talk about the topic of the vedio, wtf relates the hotness of a moon with interstellar travel theory
14:37 allright. Im confused. I was watching a vid on intersteller travel and now we are in volcanoes.
Is This a new spaceship that runs on Volcanic Energy?
So, at 9.8 metres per second squared how long would it take to get up to travelling at light speed?
508,813 minutes.
508813 minutes in days is 353. So basically one year to reach the speed of light.
It's virtually impossible.
@justinscribner9927 Well, we'll never, ever even remotely get close to travel at the speed of light, so it's a pointless debate.
This comment and your question is ridiculously dumb
If that theory is correct.. earth maybe consider a generational ship.. earth is traveling through space
I'm signing off due to the loud, distracting music overpowering the narrative.
The common factor with ufo's is that they have all perfected antigravity not artificial gravity which is what we still base our expected long range travel on. It will never be possible this way. We have not solved this problem, so we still have the same barriers to overcome as far as our physical limitations. I believe that if we solve this problem we will solve the problem of g-forces and the ability to be on planets that have very strong gravitational pulls. Then and only then will we truly be a space fairing species.
You do understand that you're basing this on fictional accounts of UFOs, right?
So many people don't understand that gravity is acceleration. The planet accelerating you. The spaceship accelerating you. The airplane accelerating you. The only anti-gravity device is you accelerating yourself. An example would be a motorcycle. There is no gravity at your back because you are accelerating yourself. Lean back and the seat back is now accelerating you. You still feel gravity in the seat because the earth is accelerating you up from its center and you are accelerating yourself forward.
@@willhiebert3098Dont even know if Ufos are real 😂
@@stewiesaidthat Not trying to be a dick but you just explained in two sentences that you totally misunderstand both gravity and acceleration. Gravity is not acceleration, acceleration is not gravity but it can simulate the feeling of gravity. They are two completely different concepts. Gravity in its most basic explanation is the attraction force that separate masses exert upon each other. Acceleration's most basic explanation is the change in velocity of an object. Where you got confused is when people measure acceleration in Gforces exerted upon an object as it accelerates which simply put is the force exerted upon a mass as it accelerates in reference to the gravitational force the earth exerts on that same object. Gforce is just a reference point based upon the gravitational attraction of Earth. So when people feel the effects of 9G's they have felt the force on their body that is 9 times stronger than the gravitational force that Earth exerts upon their body. The confusing part is if you are say in a box where your only sensation is gravitational pull or acceleration gforce they are indistinguishable from one another if they exert the same force upon the body. if you experience 3Gs of acceleration it will feel the same to your body as the pull of an object on your body that is 3x more massive than earth. The experience will appear to be the same force as your body can detect it, but they are two separate forces just equal in effects upon the human body. So if you stand in an elevator that accelerates to the 100th floor with a force of 3gs it would be indistinguishable to your body as if you stood in an elevator that didnt move on a planet 3x more massive than earth which would exert 3x the gravitational pull on your body. So please understand what you are saying before you make statements telling others that they do not understand the same concepts you are misinterpreting. I am by no means and expert in the physics of this universe, however, I know enough to say that your statement was completely ignorant of what gravity and acceleration are and how they affect mass in this universe.
@jameshendershot4234 I hope you know that you are completely wrong.
1) Newton's law of Motion. The apple fell from the tree because it was no longer being accelerated at that radius and 'fell' until the ground caught up with it. The apple is accelerated by the tree, which gets its acceleration from the ground.
If you turn the apple tree 90 degrees and replace the tree with a cart and the ground with a trailing vehicle. Is the apple 'gravitationally' attracted to the car's windshield or is it a change in acceleration. Laws of physics are equally applicable IN ALL FRAMES OF REFERENCE.
2) Einstein himself said that gravity is due to acceleration. In a rocketship, that frame of reference is in a vertical position. On earth, it's a curved frame of reference.
3) the hammer&feather drop tests on the moon proved that their is no gravitational attraction between objects objects. Electromagnetic? Yes. The earth is not pulling you down, it's accelerating you out from the center of rotation and in a forward direction. The Earth's motion causes curved space. Not its mass. F=ma. Mass is inert. It has no force without acceleration. There is no law of gravity because mass is not a force. Newton was wrong with his gravitational attraction, and Einstein was wrong with his relativity nonsense.
It doesn't matter what the mass of the planet is. The g-force is the acceleration factor.
What you flat Earthers don't understand is that the earth is rotating on its axis while orbiting the sun which is orbiting the galactic center which is moving towards the Great Attractor. What is the direction of motion? What is the speed?
เราณรงค์..ดีสมบัติพาบคราชสิกพาบจาก.คนเกิดวันที่..1..ตุลาคม.2520...20...พาบอาอากาศดีดีแต่ที่..กับสิ่งดีแต่เมือง
This narrator. Dysrythymic is a good word to describe it. His cadence is so bizarre I can little pay attention to what he is saying for wondering how tf he got this job.
Music is way too loud
Paradigm?
I already figured out the time problem I need negative density materials and funding
I’ve seen several of these clips in other videos. Lol I think that’s my sign that I watch waaaay tooooo much YT. Or, maybe too many space videos. Can one watch too many space videos?? I don’t think so…lolol Also, the guy that passed out looked like he may actually be having a stroke. Hope he is alright!!
Happens😂
Acceleration to the speed of light? Sorry you've lost me, because of that and talking about going faster than the speed of light.
♪♫♥Very interesting - Thank you for sharing !
Can this be possible given the vast majority of peoples on the earth?
Is Santa clause a alien or time traveller we must wonder
Yes
19:58 what noise!! Why? Interstellar volcano thrash.
This is a mess. This the Evil in evilspace. No thx
❤❤ Hare Krišna 🍀🔥🔥💯
Good video, but... after you presented the statistic that about 6000 roughly qualifying planets have been discovered within our present technology, you forgot to mention this:
One by one, through every... single.... one... of these 'high hopes' planets, they have been eliminated by any one of a number of utterly obliterating conditions that exist within the realm of each and every one of these candidate planets to render them all uninhabitable to humans. Period.
I realize that we are at a small sampling of our galaxy at this point, let alone the Galaxy or beyond but, in my mind it is somewhat telling so as to put a significant dint in my opinion of Carl Sagan, and Prof. Drake's equations proclaiming 10s of thousands of sentient civilizations even within our own galaxy. Sort of lends a bit of a solution to Mr. Fermi's paradox, or Mad Max Tegmark's Mathematical/ MultiVerse BS which even as an atheist, I just can't buy into. Mr. Tegmark's book is only one of two books I have ever thrown against a wall in my life. This is not at all encouraging news. As an armchair scientist, in these times, and like everything else, physics is in a mess. Even makes me wonder within the last few years if whether we have actually gone forward at all, or gone backward...
26 years ago, I did the Drake equation twice, a few days apart, independently thought out and referenced, without referring to either calculation . I got (1.6) and (1.8). We are the (1). The (.6) and the (.8) mean nothing because you can't have (.6) of a civilization. It has to be an integer. We may well be.... alone....
The Dork Equation came about out of then need to scam the taxpayers so a bunch of useless idiots could sit around and do nothing.
As for the entire scientific community, we'll, they still think that the earth is flat. It's gravity this and gravity that. Gravitational attraction is the reason objects fall to the ground on a stationary plane and not float off into space like smoke. As long as they have their heads up Einstein’s ass, they will never understand the universe.
I think maybe they don't want to which is why they keep preaching the gospel according to St Einstein.
F=ma. Force comes from Acceleration of the mass. Not the mass itself. Acceleration is not defined, its unbounded infinite.
E=mc. Acceleration is now defined, bounded, limited in scope. Mass (Space) is then bounded/defined at the speed of light. Mass comes from Acceleration. Not the other way around. Everything is an emergent property of acceleration.
Without acceleration. There is nothing, absolute zero. Instead building optical telescopes looking for dark matter. They should be researching what Absolute Zero is.
They went from the Dork Equation, millions of civilians in the galaxy to the universe being 97% dark matter. One scam after another to waste taxpayer money on deadening projects.
E=mc. Acceleration is what defines the universe. Acceleration is the fundamental force of nature. Not gravity. Not mass. Acceleration. So what is Acceleration? It all goes back to who turned in the lights. What is Absolute Zero. How do you get something from nothing. Is anything even real. Is the universe just a virtual reality simulation?
That's way past a bunch of low IQ physicists who still think the earth is a stationary plane.
How could you ever have children on a generational ship? Especially one where they wouldnt ever be able to leave the ship? Thats one of the most depressing things i could think of. We are already on one heading for Andromeda, sit tight.
Not really a generational ship would be so large that it would be a moving mega city. I know people who have never left their small town and are happy.
@shanecrothers5792 wouldn't be bad if every single child that was born wanted to stay within that city I guess.
And im not even going to get a single like or comment on this post and that is why i love RUclips's algorithm.
You ask for a like like a baby and its not even your post its just your comment😂
@@ashcatchem8890 the only person to like my comment
The generation of Dragons own interstellar! 11 zodiac left! LoL ,😈🌐🌎🌐🌌❄️
So do you wanna discuss with your Draconian friends about space generations?
The electro magnetic field will cancel the g force
You mean fantasies ....not theories .....
If I chose a video about "space travel theories" I don't want to see lots of planet's moons! Dislike!
lol…perhaps those moon are some candidate settlements as space travel destinations.
The planet IO? 😂
Methane Clouds smell like farts..
Clickbait video
Is this AI narrated ? Don't like it
This is so awful. The AI narrator can't pronounce any words, and there is music that sounds like a monster diesel engine seizing up. Barf.
2 Forces PUSHED PULLED NO GRAVITY ON WATER JXULIQRUVY
Atmospheric presure targets the water problem, which most scientists agree is tyed to gravity in some ways. Granted, this is just coming from a humans perspective , and the government and NASA are not being completely honest with the public about aliens and ufo's, we really don't have much choice but to work with what we have. I believe we'll get it and hope it's in my lifetime.
When you get deep in physics you realize that space travel is almost or endeed imposible, we are never going to leave or solar system, if we in a very far future invent a type of space ship the far we could posible get is the the best case 80 - 120 L.Y from earth after that distance the ship would be in a no return no destination arrival being stuck in space that even a the speed of light you could never come back niether get to your destiny
Have you considered that it could be A.I. Onboard and therefore time itself become negligible, cloning humans from embryonic . This is not out of question in current exponential growth in A.I.
😊
Very light on 'space travel theories,' and heavy on bits of stock footage we've all seen before. This video could have been 3 or 4 minutes long.
Nerd fantasy from the tomb, soooooostupid
Just send robots, keep working on getting faster. Maybe laser highways?