I used the 18-55 for years, and have had the 16-55 for about a year. My advice is that if you are serious about image quality and want a definite upgrade from the 18-55, the 16-55 is definitely worth the price. In fact, if I had it to do over again, I would bypass the kit lens and jump straight to the red badge. The 18-55 is a fine lens but its big brother is clearly better. It’s like the difference between 95% and 99% for the critical eye: the 4% is a deal-breaker/maker. I was concerned that the 16-55 doesn’t have OIS but turns out this is not a problem at all-basic technical understanding of photographic physics and your camera, and use of multiple exposures (as needed), easily work around this...I would say lack of OIS will actually help you become a more skilled photographer. If you’re demanding, get the 16-55.
Really loving the POV stuff, its great to see, especially for street photography as you can pick up so many little thought processes by seeing it live, really great!
Thank you for doing these kinds of reviews. Everyone always focuses on reviewing things when they’re in brand new state and they never point out how it holds up over time
Out of my Fuji 3 Primes and 2 Zoom XF lenses (16mm f.14/35mm f1.4/56mm f1.2/10-24mm f4/16-55mm f2.8), if I had to keep only one, it would be the 16-55mm f2.8 hands down.
Hello, I have a question that perhaps you could help me with, since you have one of the lenses in question. It might be a stupid question but here goes. I have a XF 18-55 f/2.8 Fuji lens (came with the camera) and lately I've heard people rave about and seen pictures shot on the XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR prime lens. Would you think it's a good investment to get the 16mm f/1.4 prime lens for someone who has already the XF18-55 f/2.8? I know they are not the same and one is wider and has more stops but I am curious to know if the lens is indeed worth 760 Euros or if I am blinded by my new-knickknack-obsession? Thanks for any help in this matter.
Own a 23 1.4, 60 2.4, 35 1.4, 18-55/F2.8-4. Only 1 body XE3 but with a handgrip. Bought the 16-55 a month ago. Immediately in love with this lens and leaving my lens in dry cabinet. Its a glue to my camera.I agree about the image compare to 18-55.. cannot be describe but i love the tone colour on 16-55 much much better and the sharpness. Hands down its the best lens. Sold the 18-55 a week later after i bought.
I love my copy! It is my "go to" lens when I'm not sure what I'll be wanting to accomplish, and I want to simply hang it from a shoulder harness and not carry a bag/a variety of lenses. I do own the F/2 23mm, 35mm, & 50mm lenses. But this zoom gets a lot more use as a general purpose, easy to carry lens. Thank you for the very fair assessment of the lens' pros and cons. I think for most people the pros will outweigh the cons.
Glad to hear :) that you use it a bunch I also have a 23,33&56 but am trying to decide wether to get the Tamron 17-70mm 2.8 . I’m just wondering how much I will miss the 1.4 to 2.8 or if I even will ;) have a great day!!!
Recently started binge watching your videos, love the content and your down to earth opinions on gear. Excellent work too, you've convinced me to buy my first fuji zoom!
Great video, as usual, Roman. Recently came across a great deal (open box demo unit) on a 16-55. As a senior on a limited budget (so I tell my wife) I am looking forward to leaving my trusty 18-55 at home for a bit. I’ll have to compose carefully as with no IOS & no IBIS in my XT-3, I’ll have to control my previous evenings consumption of adult beverages.
I basically have covered the gamut of primes (23mm 1.4 | 35mm 1.4 | 56mm 1.2 | 85mm macro | adapted sigma art 50mm ) and as i do more video work in run and gun style i know i'll need a zoom - after thinking alot about the sigma and tamron glass this is the one - just picked it up and pray i love it as much as it's fuji brethren
Roman Thanks for your great review. As a working pro I really liked your review and loved your style. I really liked your images and I think you have a great eye. Having worked in press and commercial photography for over 30 years! I still only have the 18-55 kit lens, as I mainly shoot with the 10-24mm when needing a wide zoom. I agree with you about the quality of the kit lens, it’s in no way bad but I definitely notice the lack of sharpness more often than not. Having stumbled upon your video it has now made me realise I need to invest in the 16-55 upgrade!! Keep up the good work. 😀
Like your blog and the soundtrack . I never felt there was much downside to any of Fuji’s lenses prime or zoom provided they were used appropriately. With the advent of higher FPS ,higher dynamic range and faster processors it’s important to read manuals regarding focus characteristics carefully.This is important for prosumers lest they get discouraged and switch to a “better” system.
Thank you for the review, Mr. Fox. My father-in-law passed away last month, and he left behind an XT-3 and an X-Pro2. This lens is in his dry cabinet, and I was wondering what it is best used for. Myself being a Sony user I have the A100 and Nex-5C), using Fujifilm has been a huge change for me. Again, thank you for the honest review.
The pov at the end is a very interesting added bonus. Maybe not for a dedicated video, but a nice close. I really enjoyed it. I've subscribed for more 👍
Honestly I loved the image quality but hated the weight. A big benefit of the Fuji system is it’s size. The 18-55 also is good enough for like 90% plus 55mm f/2.8 kind of isn’t enough for portraits anyway so yeah. Get the 50 f/1.0 and keep the 18-55
So I’ve noticed I use my 16-80 for just carrying around (weather sealing was a must), but for work 16-55 and 50-140 is the go to. Need to invest in some fast primes. Hopping the viltrox or Tokina lenses are good
@@snapsbyfox truth be told I got it for the insane stabilization and utility for video which prob is negated by the xt3 now. But the zoom range makes it useful. Signs glass would be a game changer would love to see the 18-35 1.8 in f mount
This lens was made for the XH1 hehe!😊 like the chest mounted video idea of taking pictures, niiiiiice! Just bought a chesty for my go pro, will give it ago, thanks
Thanks man, great review. I've pre-ordered this with my new X-T4. Should arrive end of this week, looking forward to it! Sold my A7III and 24-105 f/4 lens for this combo, can't wait! I'm debating with my self if I should go primes, but I think I will go for both! Start out with this, and get some primes later on (maybe 16mm f1.4, and the 56mm). As I'm traveling a bit (or well, used to) the zoom will be great. My only gripe is the size and weight, but still smaller setup then my A7III. Mostly for video, but I have a feeling Fuji will bring out the photographer in me as well ;) subbed for more content in the future!
Владимир Ленин it was a great lens, excellent quality in all zoom ranges and f-stops. It was very much like the 24-105, but I think I actually liked the fuji better. It had some magic to it that I just can't describe. I sold it tho, and got the 16mm F2 and 35mm F2, for a lighter setup. My first primes, and happy so far. Missing the versatility of the zoom sometimes, but the smaller setup and a bit more light is welcoming.
Often heard of that special rendering. A direct comparison would be interesting. I avoided this lens because of the bulk and weight. Maybe i should give it a try.
just got XE4 with kit lens (f27) and this lens. No IBIS on XE4, and it feels like camera is mounted on the lens rather than the other way round. Let's see if I like it
Fujinon xf 16-55mm f2.8 r lm wr Un obiettivo di notevole qualità in termini ottici e meccanici, ottima luminosità ma un grande grandissimo difetto: la gomma dello zoom (grip anello) si è usurata e scollata utilizzando l'obiettivo in maniera poco intensiva e per brevi periodi. Considerando il costo dell'obiettivo mi aspettavo il massimo in tutto, anche perchè viene venduto come "obiettivo tropicalizzato" cioè resistente alle intemperie, polvere, ecc; per la sostituzione va mandato unicamente al centro assistenza a Milano a vostre spese, costo del cambio gomma tra 100 e 150 euro. Un vecchio obiettivo zoom usato per oltre 20 anni su una reflex analogica le gomme sono praticamente indenni. GRANDISSIMA DELUSIONE (disponibile video)
You sold another one, Mr. Fox. I’m looking for the best all-in-one everyday lens and this seems to be my best bet. Should have it by the beginning of next week.
Really appreciate the advice on how it's not too comfy/ergonomic with the X-T30. As I was considering getting it for my X-T30, but that sort of thing is definitley a deal breaker. I love using my primes and was just worrying a bit too much about not having the zoom.
Hi Roman, just started binge watching your videos as you are by far the most practical and straightforward reviewer for the Fuji lenses and cameras. Thanks for the massive effort in creating this videos. Would really appreciate if you can help me with my dilemma. I do beauty and fashion videos in youtube and own the XT2 and the 56mmf1.2 as well as the 18-55mm kit lens. I still feel I'm not getting the same quality of videos as I wanted out from the 2 lenses. The 56mmf1.2 whilst amazing with portrait photos, using it for beauty videos is just terrible with its noisy autofocus. I'm not a pro just a newbie in the camera system who just happened to get the Fuji XT2 as my first camera. I'm considering upgrading to the XT4 but given what I do with fashion & beauty videos, what would be the best Fuji lens with good and silent autofocus that you can recommend? And would you think upgrading to the XT4 from the XT2 for videos is worth it? Thanks heaps!
Nice one Roman, I’m thinking about getting this lens to pair up with the XT4, I shoot mostly street & normally use primes or the X100V. Thanks for the review, I hate those pixel peeping style reviews, yours was a good mix of info & images & some street photography POV 👌🏻📷
Should i buy 16-55 or 16-80? How about lack of OIS? I really try to figure out which lenses I need for videos and photos. I will shoot a lot of handheld, I want to do vlog style while walking and talking, also some short filmmaking. Have to say I really really want 16-55 2.8, but 16-80 versatility is winning now.. really hard decisions... Maybe I will get 16-80 and try to do stuff with that, and probably get a couple of prime lenses.
Yeah, this is definitely a go-to lens for me as well, but I only like using it on my XT3 with the battery grip on. Otherwise, it just doesn't feel good.
Great video, very professional and informative. You're great to watch and listen too! Now if I mainly project to shoot stills and very few videos, should I spend the extra money on the XT4 or is the XT3 plenty enough for photography even without the IBIS? Considering which body I'll choose should I go for the 16-55 (with no OIS) or 16-80? The point is as I also like shooting in lowlight would the 2.8 aperture not give me an edge over the f4 aperture of the 16-80? Cheers !
@@snapsbyfox Hi Roman. You know what, I followed your advice and just bought me a XT3, in black just looks fabulous, with the 16-80 lens ;) It's like I heard from elsewhere, photography did not start with IBIS and even less did night photography start with it, I remember the days I travelled around with my Minolta 505si ;)) I'm really happy I saved that money to still get a top camera, good lens, and leaving room for a prime or 2. Your pics are amazing, nice communicating with you. Cheers!
Thsank you for this video, it is very useful and inspirating :) I have got a question. Do you also need a gimbal if you make videos with x-t4 and fujinon 16-55mm? Because i see in some videos how people make videos with this equipment from hand.
Shooting street didn't find that people would notice you more than let's say the 23mm f2? and is not the weight bother you after few hours of shooting? I do use a 16mm f1.4 for streets but I'm thinking about getting the 16-55 and sell the 16mm.
Nice video, you definitely have a good eye for street photography, I enjoy watching the photos. As far as this lens is concerned, I agree with you 100% (and that’s why a got the XF 16-80) Hahaha.
Hey Roman, love your channel and came back to watch this video again as I’m trying to decide what lens I should get next. I’m new to photography and have the xt3 with the 18-55 , but want to get into some portraiture/street but also some video on the side. I was thinking of going with the 16-55 2.8 or the 23mm f2 and the 50mm f2 (or maybe just the 35mm f2 with the kit Lens for video) what do u suggest ?
Hi, how is the image quality straight out of the camera (jpeg) and this lens (15-55 f2.8)? im not good at editing photo or video and im only do casual travel documentary and street photography. And im planning to buy xt 4 with this lens 16-55 f2 8
hello Roman, excellent video! Congratulations! Right now I am trying to get this wonderful lens in London, I will get it thanks to a friend who is traveling there, and he will bring it to Uruguay which is where I live, could you guide me, where to buy, at a better price? right now . At first I thought to buy it on Ebay, used, and cheaper, but, I am a little afraid, later have a problem, (also because I have realized that in the UK, the prices are a little higher than in other countries of Europe) In the end, to be calm, I have decided to buy it new, could you tell me where?
I also have this lens coupled with XH1. Can you please tell me the settings you use for street photography? Another thing...do you use zone focusing in street photography? If yes then please make video on it. Love your videos. They are really informative.
Hello, I have a question that perhaps Roman or anyone here could answer. It might be a stupid question but here goes. I have a XF 18-55 f/2.8 Fuji lens (came with the camera) and lately I've heard people rave about and seen pictures shot on the XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR prime lens. Would you think it's a good investment to get the 16mm f/1.4 prime lens for someone who has already the XF18-55 f/2.8? I know they are not the same and one is wider and has more stops but I am curious to know if the lens is indeed worth 760 Euros or if I am blinded by my new-knickknack-obsession? Thanks for any help in this matter.
I am curious, do you not notice that the lens is considerably soft at 55mm? Also I feel that the lack of corner sharpness makes it a problem to print non-cropped images large (A3-A2 size).
I get sand under the focus ring every time I take it to the beach. I had it serviced and it was all good. Took it to the beach on a slightly windy day it got sand in the ring again, it's so annoying.
First off agreed that it was a great review. The center stays sharp across the zoom range. At the corners 16mm is a touch soft, 30mm not as good as the center but still very good and at 55mm a bit softer than 16mm. At 16mm f/2.8 this lens is almost identical to the XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR at f/2.8 which is an amazing lens. IMO the XF 16-55mm f/2.8 is better than the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM lens. Outside of Fujifilm's Fujinon cine lenses this is as good as it gets. In the end unless someone pixel peeping no one will notice. I have this lens and It is worth every penny. If I could only have one lens this would be it. The only drawback is that it's really big which is why many times I'll carry and use a few primes.
This is such a detailed and well explained review :) I enjoyed it very much, thank you for this! However, I am currently in a state of dilemma. Well, I recently switched systems from Canon to Fuji and I have a hard time deciding which lens should I get. I’m currently using an X-T4 and loving it so far. I am a photographer (just a hobbyist) and I have an XF 10-24 f4 because I need the wide angle shot to take photos of cityscape/landscapes and also did a bit of vlogging with it as well. I would be doing mainly photograph still, but would like to do some videography in the future. What lens should I go with next? I’m torn between the XF 16-55mm f2.8 or a bunch of primes of 23mm f2 + 35mm f2 + 50mm f2. I’m not considering the fast primes of f1.4 because I heard the autofocus is not great as it’s an old lens with old focusing motors. The f1.4 primes are great lenses which produce amazing pictures (don’t get me wrong), but I wouldn’t mind the f2 as they have better motors and faster autofocus which will help my videography in the future. I am aware that the XF 16-55 f2.8 is great for video as well because of its linear motor (LM) with silent yet fast autofocus. So knowing that I’m just a hobbyist photographer who would like to try to produce cinematic videos in the future, which lens do you recommend? XF 16-55mm f2.8 or the f2 primes? Cost will not be an issue for me as they add up to roughly the same price. Thanks! Your opinion on this will be greatly appreciated.
hmm both will be similar for you. just depends on your budget. Only issue with 18-55 is no weather sealing.... the 16-55 will also work better with IBIS... I would say 16-55 as it will be a better long term investment
@@snapsbyfox thank you so much. Then after this, if I want to buy, I can buy fuji 50-140 mm lens. I think that would cover the entire range. Please advise
Thank you for an excellent review, your street photography shots are superb, you make it look real easy and I know that this is not always the case. Keep up the great work..... BTW what film simulation are you using as a day to day on the Fuji ?
Many thanks Roman, I really like the look and feel of the shots in London, I guess you shot in RAW and added the film simulation in edit .? Just ordered the XT4 and 16-80mm combo as it was too much of a bargain to turn down. Like you I own and use the 8-16mm, 16-55 and 50-140mm and agree they are all superb lenses for stills for sure. Looking forward to hearing more from you in the near future. I have to say that your style and the way you come across in your blogs is excellent and refreshing to see something a little different to the norm.
_"What you think of the 18-55 kit? "_ It's an excellent lens and much better than any Canon or Nikon kit lens. If you're shooting an X-Trans II 16MP sensor, can live with the f/4 aperture on the long end and don't need weather resistance the XF 16-55mm f/2.8 is overkill. If you're using X-Trans III or IV sensor, printing large images and could use weather resistance the XF 16-55mm f/2.8 will make a difference. Because of the OIS the XF 18-55mm lens is a better choice for video.
@@snapsbyfox Good thought. The XF 16-80mm is an excellent choice for video over the 18-55mm because it's weather resistant, has a longer reach, constant f/stop and I suspect a bit better build since it's WR rated. The only downsides are size and cost. The 16-55mm might be the most commonly found XF lens on the used market which has depressed its price making it a great deal whereas the 16-80mm on the used market still commands a high price. All told IMO if cost isn't an issue the 16-80mm would be the way to go.
So let me get this straight, you never look in the camera when you take street pictures? Do you take all your pictures at chest height with the screen? The last part is really nice to look at, good idea!
Like the way you are presenting your vids. I’m thinking of buying this lens for travel shooting. So far, I’ve been held back by the size and weight, but damn, the IQ is really good.
Roman Fox bought the 16-55 and shot with for an entire day in Amsterdam. First views seem excellent and the lens is really a pleasure to work with. Have a feeling I should have bought it way earlier😀
@@max-olson You know, it's funny, but the size & weight in practice are not bothering me at all. The handling of the lens is excellent and it feels good in the hand; better actually than the much lighter 18-55 kit lens. It also helps that, when zooming in, the lens extends only a little bit, whereas a lens like the 16-80 becomes twice as tall. Having said all that, I use this lens in combination with an XT2, which balances very nicely against the lens. I have also used it on the much smaller XT20, which is doable, but would never be my preferred choice.
@@ozuidema Interesting. I have the XT4, but really on the fence about the 16-55 or the 16-80, just seems like the gap in image quality might be worth the extra weight on the 16-55. What do you think?
@@max-olson The 16-80 is known to be soft at the end of the focal spectres, both wide-angle and tele. And some say that the corners are soft as well. The 16-55 is very sharp across the entire range. The workmanship is extraordinary; it's a red badge zoom and that's not just a marketing ploy; you will feel the difference immediately. For me, also important was the 2.8 versus 4.0. With the 16-55, I can shoot portraits at 2.8 at, say, 50mm (which is a focal length that I like a lot) and achieve good background separation. With the 16-80 at 4.0 you can achieve that too, but you need to back up a lot further, which is not always practical. Zooming in, the 16-80 extends a lot, which makes it more prone to dust suck. Finally, I had some doubt about the fact that the OIS turns off automatically when placed on a tripod; I prefer to be able to turn it off manually (although so far I have not read any complaints about that; time will tell). Of course, the 16-80 DOES have OIS, while the 16-55 does not. Since I hardly shoot any video, that does no bother me, but for you this might be different. To me, it's really an (easy) choice between a consumer travel lens and a pro standard zoom (if that does not sound too snobbish; I'm not a pro by any stretch of the imagination :)). Best buy of 2020.
@@snapsbyfox Thanks. I'm still trying to learn how to edit photos. I'm a beginner and hobbyist and your videos really help! I really want this lens but need to save up! I know I don't need it but it's more of an emotional "wanting". Seems sharp enough to keep up with some primes within it's range. Keep up the good work! :)
Great video and love it that you dont do pixel peep reviews! I found it funny the way you showed the front of the lens in your video it looked like a front end of a gun!! Ive had this lens since released and i find that i dont have the confidence to use it for street photography due to its size!! And have you ever felt that using primes on the street is better for size,weight and stealth? I only use this lens for family events and maybe travel because of its size,whats your favourite focal length for Street photography?
![YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Missing Everything [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dTYeMZGzOzw/mqdefault.jpg)
I used the 18-55 for years, and have had the 16-55 for about a year. My advice is that if you are serious about image quality and want a definite upgrade from the 18-55, the 16-55 is definitely worth the price. In fact, if I had it to do over again, I would bypass the kit lens and jump straight to the red badge. The 18-55 is a fine lens but its big brother is clearly better. It’s like the difference between 95% and 99% for the critical eye: the 4% is a deal-breaker/maker. I was concerned that the 16-55 doesn’t have OIS but turns out this is not a problem at all-basic technical understanding of photographic physics and your camera, and use of multiple exposures (as needed), easily work around this...I would say lack of OIS will actually help you become a more skilled photographer. If you’re demanding, get the 16-55.
Ive watched several reviews of a whole lot of lenses, this is by far one of the best ones amongst youtube, keep up the good work mate
Ich
Ja das war
Ja das war
i like how rough you are on you gear, gives me relief when ever get any of my gear dirty that all hope is not lost.
Really loving the POV stuff, its great to see, especially for street photography as you can pick up so many little thought processes by seeing it live, really great!
Thank you for doing these kinds of reviews. Everyone always focuses on reviewing things when they’re in brand new state and they never point out how it holds up over time
Out of my Fuji 3 Primes and 2 Zoom XF lenses (16mm f.14/35mm f1.4/56mm f1.2/10-24mm f4/16-55mm f2.8), if I had to keep only one, it would be the 16-55mm f2.8 hands down.
hear, hear!!
Can you show some of your work with all those lenses ?
I see you don't have a youtube channel tho.
Hi, same for me but I keep the 16-55 f2.8 and ?. What was your choice ?
Hello,
I have a question that perhaps you could help me with, since you have one of the lenses in question. It might be a stupid question but here goes.
I have a XF 18-55 f/2.8 Fuji lens (came with the camera) and lately I've heard people rave about and seen pictures shot on the XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR prime lens. Would you think it's a good investment to get the 16mm f/1.4 prime lens for someone who has already the XF18-55 f/2.8? I know they are not the same and one is wider and has more stops but I am curious to know if the lens is indeed worth 760 Euros or if I am blinded by my new-knickknack-obsession?
Thanks for any help in this matter.
Insanely sharp lens and incredibly versatile. The AF motor is near silent and keeps up very well with Fuji’s AF.
Roman, I am
really astonished how you clearly and proficiently explain so much better than other You tubers. I absolutely love your review.
Own a 23 1.4, 60 2.4, 35 1.4, 18-55/F2.8-4. Only 1 body XE3 but with a handgrip. Bought the 16-55 a month ago. Immediately in love with this lens and leaving my lens in dry cabinet. Its a glue to my camera.I agree about the image compare to 18-55.. cannot be describe but i love the tone colour on 16-55 much much better and the sharpness. Hands down its the best lens. Sold the 18-55 a week later after i bought.
How do you compare the image quality from the 16-55mm to the 35mm 1.4?
Watching these POV walk & shoot sessions is oddly therapeutic. Nice work Roman 👏
The shot of the guy vaping. Made the whole video worth watching. Absolutely staggering shot.
I love my copy! It is my "go to" lens when I'm not sure what I'll be wanting to accomplish, and I want to simply hang it from a shoulder harness and not carry a bag/a variety of lenses. I do own the F/2 23mm, 35mm, & 50mm lenses. But this zoom gets a lot more use as a general purpose, easy to carry lens. Thank you for the very fair assessment of the lens' pros and cons. I think for most people the pros will outweigh the cons.
Glad to hear :) that you use it a bunch I also have a 23,33&56 but am trying to decide wether to get the Tamron 17-70mm 2.8 . I’m just wondering how much I will miss the 1.4 to 2.8 or if I even will ;) have a great day!!!
Sometimes you don't need all that "scientific tests" but a real experience. Thank you!
Look Like this might be the lens I get with my XT4 at the end of July. Fuji sent me the XT3 and I did a review on it, loved it man. Fuji all the way
14:46 - I was hoping you'd get that shot. Amazing!
Recently started binge watching your videos, love the content and your down to earth opinions on gear. Excellent work too, you've convinced me to buy my first fuji zoom!
Great video, as usual, Roman. Recently came across a great deal (open box demo unit) on a 16-55. As a senior on a limited budget (so I tell my wife) I am looking forward to leaving my trusty 18-55 at home for a bit. I’ll have to compose carefully as with no IOS & no IBIS in my XT-3, I’ll have to control my previous evenings consumption of adult beverages.
You definitely make the best reviews!
love your video's I just had this lens delivered today... can't wait to get out with it. 🙂
I basically have covered the gamut of primes (23mm 1.4 | 35mm 1.4 | 56mm 1.2 | 85mm macro | adapted sigma art 50mm ) and as i do more video work in run and gun style i know i'll need a zoom - after thinking alot about the sigma and tamron glass this is the one - just picked it up and pray i love it as much as it's fuji brethren
Roman
Thanks for your great review. As a working pro I really liked your review and loved your style. I really liked your images and I think you have a great eye. Having worked in press and commercial photography for over 30 years! I still only have the 18-55 kit lens, as I mainly shoot with the 10-24mm when needing a wide zoom. I agree with you about the quality of the kit lens, it’s in no way bad but I definitely notice the lack of sharpness more often than not. Having stumbled upon your video it has now made me realise I need to invest in the 16-55 upgrade!! Keep up the good work. 😀
Like your blog and the soundtrack . I never felt there was much downside to any of Fuji’s lenses prime or zoom provided they were used appropriately. With the advent of higher FPS ,higher dynamic range and faster processors it’s important to read manuals regarding focus characteristics carefully.This is important for prosumers lest they get discouraged and switch to a “better” system.
Thank you for the review, Mr. Fox.
My father-in-law passed away last month, and he left behind an XT-3 and an X-Pro2.
This lens is in his dry cabinet, and I was wondering what it is best used for.
Myself being a Sony user I have the A100 and Nex-5C), using Fujifilm has been a huge change for me.
Again, thank you for the honest review.
Roman Fox thank you.
I like both of them actually 🤣
really awesome review, especially with your sample shots and mentioning how it feels on an XT4. definitely helped with my purchase decision.
The pov at the end is a very interesting added bonus. Maybe not for a dedicated video, but a nice close. I really enjoyed it.
I've subscribed for more 👍
I totally agree with you. Great lens and the quality is very good!
Honestly I loved the image quality but hated the weight. A big benefit of the Fuji system is it’s size. The 18-55 also is good enough for like 90% plus 55mm f/2.8 kind of isn’t enough for portraits anyway so yeah. Get the 50 f/1.0 and keep the 18-55
So I’ve noticed I use my 16-80 for just carrying around (weather sealing was a must), but for work 16-55 and 50-140 is the go to.
Need to invest in some fast primes. Hopping the viltrox or Tokina lenses are good
@@snapsbyfox truth be told I got it for the insane stabilization and utility for video which prob is negated by the xt3 now. But the zoom range makes it useful.
Signs glass would be a game changer would love to see the 18-35 1.8 in f mount
Roman my guy, you are AWESOME! Really wanna jump into this Fuji system now👌🏼
one of the best reviews!
This lens was made for the XH1 hehe!😊 like the chest mounted video idea of taking pictures, niiiiiice! Just bought a chesty for my go pro, will give it ago, thanks
Lens cloth lives in my left rear jean pocket and it's always on hand, try it 😁
Thanks man, great review. I've pre-ordered this with my new X-T4. Should arrive end of this week, looking forward to it! Sold my A7III and 24-105 f/4 lens for this combo, can't wait! I'm debating with my self if I should go primes, but I think I will go for both! Start out with this, and get some primes later on (maybe 16mm f1.4, and the 56mm). As I'm traveling a bit (or well, used to) the zoom will be great. My only gripe is the size and weight, but still smaller setup then my A7III. Mostly for video, but I have a feeling Fuji will bring out the photographer in me as well ;) subbed for more content in the future!
Man, how do you compare sony 's 24-105 to 16-55?
Владимир Ленин it was a great lens, excellent quality in all zoom ranges and f-stops. It was very much like the 24-105, but I think I actually liked the fuji better. It had some magic to it that I just can't describe. I sold it tho, and got the 16mm F2 and 35mm F2, for a lighter setup. My first primes, and happy so far. Missing the versatility of the zoom sometimes, but the smaller setup and a bit more light is welcoming.
Often heard of that special rendering. A direct comparison would be interesting. I avoided this lens because of the bulk and weight. Maybe i should give it a try.
Appreciate your videos mate. Entertaining, straight to the point, plain and simple👌🏽👌🏽👌🏽
just got XE4 with kit lens (f27) and this lens. No IBIS on XE4, and it feels like camera is mounted on the lens rather than the other way round. Let's see if I like it
Thank you so much. Have you had any issues with the aperture ring? Mine reads 3.2 on the 2.8.
Fujinon xf 16-55mm f2.8 r lm wr
Un obiettivo di notevole qualità in termini ottici e meccanici, ottima luminosità ma un grande grandissimo difetto: la gomma dello zoom (grip anello) si è usurata e scollata utilizzando l'obiettivo in maniera poco intensiva e per brevi periodi. Considerando il costo dell'obiettivo mi aspettavo il massimo in tutto, anche perchè viene venduto come "obiettivo tropicalizzato" cioè resistente alle intemperie, polvere, ecc; per la sostituzione va mandato unicamente al centro assistenza a Milano a vostre spese, costo del cambio gomma tra 100 e 150 euro. Un vecchio obiettivo zoom usato per oltre 20 anni su una reflex analogica le gomme sono praticamente indenni.
GRANDISSIMA DELUSIONE (disponibile video)
You sold another one, Mr. Fox. I’m looking for the best all-in-one everyday lens and this seems to be my best bet. Should have it by the beginning of next week.
Really appreciate the advice on how it's not too comfy/ergonomic with the X-T30. As I was considering getting it for my X-T30, but that sort of thing is definitley a deal breaker. I love using my primes and was just worrying a bit too much about not having the zoom.
OK I bought it. And LOVE it with my new X-T4! Love it! It's so much more reliable than my 18-55mm, and feels like a true friend!
Yeah I now have an X-T5 and my 16-55 is almost permanently on it, unless I'm out in big fields etc in which case I do the 70-300mm.
I wish I was as humble as you ❤
Hi Roman, just started binge watching your videos as you are by far the most practical and straightforward reviewer for the Fuji lenses and cameras. Thanks for the massive effort in creating this videos. Would really appreciate if you can help me with my dilemma. I do beauty and fashion videos in youtube and own the XT2 and the 56mmf1.2 as well as the 18-55mm kit lens. I still feel I'm not getting the same quality of videos as I wanted out from the 2 lenses. The 56mmf1.2 whilst amazing with portrait photos, using it for beauty videos is just terrible with its noisy autofocus. I'm not a pro just a newbie in the camera system who just happened to get the Fuji XT2 as my first camera. I'm considering upgrading to the XT4 but given what I do with fashion & beauty videos, what would be the best Fuji lens with good and silent autofocus that you can recommend? And would you think upgrading to the XT4 from the XT2 for videos is worth it? Thanks heaps!
Appreciate this review. Experience is a much better indicator of performance than pixel peeping. Cheers mate
Nice one Roman, I’m thinking about getting this lens to pair up with the XT4, I shoot mostly street & normally use primes or the X100V.
Thanks for the review, I hate those pixel peeping style reviews, yours was a good mix of info & images & some street photography POV 👌🏻📷
thanks for the review
fascinating watching you work at the end :-)
Should i buy 16-55 or 16-80? How about lack of OIS? I really try to figure out which lenses I need for videos and photos. I will shoot a lot of handheld, I want to do vlog style while walking and talking, also some short filmmaking. Have to say I really really want 16-55 2.8, but 16-80 versatility is winning now.. really hard decisions... Maybe I will get 16-80 and try to do stuff with that, and probably get a couple of prime lenses.
Yeah, this is definitely a go-to lens for me as well, but I only like using it on my XT3 with the battery grip on. Otherwise, it just doesn't feel good.
Thank you for your review !! Do you have an advise for ND filter for this 16-55 ?
Great video, very professional and informative. You're great to watch and listen too! Now if I mainly project to shoot stills and very few videos, should I spend the extra money on the XT4 or is the XT3 plenty enough for photography even without the IBIS? Considering which body I'll choose should I go for the 16-55 (with no OIS) or 16-80? The point is as I also like shooting in lowlight would the 2.8 aperture not give me an edge over the f4 aperture of the 16-80? Cheers !
@@snapsbyfox Hi Roman. You know what, I followed your advice and just bought me a XT3, in black just looks fabulous, with the 16-80 lens ;) It's like I heard from elsewhere, photography did not start with IBIS and even less did night photography start with it, I remember the days I travelled around with my Minolta 505si ;)) I'm really happy I saved that money to still get a top camera, good lens, and leaving room for a prime or 2. Your pics are amazing, nice communicating with you. Cheers!
Thanks a lot for this review. You’re giving a lot of real usage and it’s very interesting. Great 👍
Thsank you for this video, it is very useful and inspirating :) I have got a question. Do you also need a gimbal if you make videos with x-t4 and fujinon 16-55mm? Because i see in some videos how people make videos with this equipment from hand.
Love everything about your videos 💪🏼
Excellent. Don't be afraid of a bounce card.
This lens is made with linear motors or jumps to focus in AF video, like other FujiFilm lenses?
Shooting street didn't find that people would notice you more than let's say the 23mm f2? and is not the weight bother you after few hours of shooting? I do use a 16mm f1.4 for streets but I'm thinking about getting the 16-55 and sell the 16mm.
Nice video, you definitely have a good eye for street photography, I enjoy watching the photos. As far as this lens is concerned, I agree with you 100% (and that’s why a got the XF 16-80) Hahaha.
I hope I can be as good as him someday. Shooting the man with the smoke on the wall was so epic 👌
super video thank you for your opinion on this zoom I hesitated for several days but not now 😁
still saving for this one. 😢
Sooooooo keen to buy and use this on my new XS10!
Hey Roman, love your channel and came back to watch this video again as I’m trying to decide what lens I should get next. I’m new to photography and have the xt3 with the 18-55 , but want to get into some portraiture/street but also some video on the side. I was thinking of going with the 16-55 2.8 or the 23mm f2 and the 50mm f2 (or maybe just the 35mm f2 with the kit Lens for video) what do u suggest ?
Hi, how is the image quality straight out of the camera (jpeg) and this lens (15-55 f2.8)? im not good at editing photo or video and im only do casual travel documentary and street photography. And im planning to buy xt 4 with this lens 16-55 f2 8
In one of your video you said that now you would probably buy 16-80 instead of 16-55. What are the main advantages of 16-80 lenses?
Thank you!
Great analysis and informative video thanks
Nice honest review. Do you think it would be a pain to use this with a fuji xt2, since none of them have stabilisation?
hello Roman, excellent video! Congratulations! Right now I am trying to get this wonderful lens in London, I will get it thanks to a friend who is traveling there, and he will bring it to Uruguay which is where I live, could you guide me, where to buy, at a better price? right now . At first I thought to buy it on Ebay, used, and cheaper, but, I am a little afraid, later have a problem, (also because I have realized that in the UK, the prices are a little higher than in other countries of Europe) In the end, to be calm, I have decided to buy it new, could you tell me where?
About to get this for my xpro2. Just wondering whether the size of this lens will be alright with the body size of the xpro2..
14:46 boom!
I also have this lens coupled with XH1. Can you please tell me the settings you use for street photography? Another thing...do you use zone focusing in street photography? If yes then please make video on it. Love your videos. They are really informative.
Hello,
I have a question that perhaps Roman or anyone here could answer. It might be a stupid question but here goes.
I have a XF 18-55 f/2.8 Fuji lens (came with the camera) and lately I've heard people rave about and seen pictures shot on the XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR prime lens. Would you think it's a good investment to get the 16mm f/1.4 prime lens for someone who has already the XF18-55 f/2.8? I know they are not the same and one is wider and has more stops but I am curious to know if the lens is indeed worth 760 Euros or if I am blinded by my new-knickknack-obsession?
Thanks for any help in this matter.
Should I go for it if I have a 18-55 ?
I am curious, do you not notice that the lens is considerably soft at 55mm? Also I feel that the lack of corner sharpness makes it a problem to print non-cropped images large (A3-A2 size).
My lens does change EXPOSURE while zooming IN or OUT, slightly changes, but it does...
Any advise...? Maybe I´m doing something wrong...
I have the same issue
Awesome video! I own the 18-55 and the 50-140. Considering purchasing either the 16-55 or 16 1.4.
I'm in the same dilemma 😕 I had my heart set on a 16mm f1.4 but now this has got me thinking 🤔 i have the 18-135 & 50-140mm
I get sand under the focus ring every time I take it to the beach. I had it serviced and it was all good. Took it to the beach on a slightly windy day it got sand in the ring again, it's so annoying.
How are you shooting at the end street session? Are you shooting from the hip in portrait mode? Great technique. Have never seen it done that way.
Great review mate ! Is the image quality soft overall at any particular zoom range, heard it's a bit soft at 55mm but great at 16mm ?
Thankyou
@@snapsbyfox Thanks for the reply and fair point , as long I shoot raw that shouldn't be a problem with sharpness.
First off agreed that it was a great review. The center stays sharp across the zoom range. At the corners 16mm is a touch soft, 30mm not as good as the center but still very good and at 55mm a bit softer than 16mm. At 16mm f/2.8 this lens is almost identical to the XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR at f/2.8 which is an amazing lens. IMO the XF 16-55mm f/2.8 is better than the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM lens. Outside of Fujifilm's Fujinon cine lenses this is as good as it gets. In the end unless someone pixel peeping no one will notice. I have this lens and It is worth every penny. If I could only have one lens this would be it. The only drawback is that it's really big which is why many times I'll carry and use a few primes.
@@brian-beeler Thanks heaps for the user experience you have shared, this greatly impacts my purchase decision, much appreciated!
This is such a detailed and well explained review :) I enjoyed it very much, thank you for this!
However, I am currently in a state of dilemma. Well, I recently switched systems from Canon to Fuji and I have a hard time deciding which lens should I get. I’m currently using an X-T4 and loving it so far. I am a photographer (just a hobbyist) and I have an XF 10-24 f4 because I need the wide angle shot to take photos of cityscape/landscapes and also did a bit of vlogging with it as well. I would be doing mainly photograph still, but would like to do some videography in the future. What lens should I go with next? I’m torn between the XF 16-55mm f2.8 or a bunch of primes of 23mm f2 + 35mm f2 + 50mm f2. I’m not considering the fast primes of f1.4 because I heard the autofocus is not great as it’s an old lens with old focusing motors. The f1.4 primes are great lenses which produce amazing pictures (don’t get me wrong), but I wouldn’t mind the f2 as they have better motors and faster autofocus which will help my videography in the future. I am aware that the XF 16-55 f2.8 is great for video as well because of its linear motor (LM) with silent yet fast autofocus.
So knowing that I’m just a hobbyist photographer who would like to try to produce cinematic videos in the future, which lens do you recommend? XF 16-55mm f2.8 or the f2 primes? Cost will not be an issue for me as they add up to roughly the same price. Thanks! Your opinion on this will be greatly appreciated.
@@snapsbyfox alright thanks for your opinion regarding this, much appreciated :)
The last shot was sick!
I expected something completely different 💁
Did you just expose for the lights?
How about 18-55 2.8 kit lens? Which one is better for a XT4 beginner for alround purpose ?
hmm both will be similar for you. just depends on your budget. Only issue with 18-55 is no weather sealing.... the 16-55 will also work better with IBIS... I would say 16-55 as it will be a better long term investment
@@snapsbyfox thank you so much. Then after this, if I want to buy, I can buy fuji 50-140 mm lens. I think that would cover the entire range. Please advise
I use it. Heavy but sharp
What was the IBIS like on the X-T4 and this lens?
Hey mate do you use Lightroom? If so how do you find the Fuji raw files work with Adobe?
LM in this lens has 4 motors, not 2 as in small brother 18-55 f2.8-4,
Thank you for an excellent review, your street photography shots are superb, you make it look real easy and I know that this is not always the case. Keep up the great work..... BTW what film simulation are you using as a day to day on the Fuji ?
Many thanks Roman, I really like the look and feel of the shots in London, I guess you shot in RAW and added the film simulation in edit .? Just ordered the XT4 and 16-80mm combo as it was too much of a bargain to turn down. Like you I own and use the 8-16mm, 16-55 and 50-140mm and agree they are all superb lenses for stills for sure. Looking forward to hearing more from you in the near future. I have to say that your style and the way you come across in your blogs is excellent and refreshing to see something a little different to the norm.
Do You recommend it for video ? I got X-T4 and looking for something wide and flexible (zoom) already got 23mm 2.0 and Viltrox 33 1.4
100% best video lens I have
@@snapsbyfox allright :) i will purchase it :D
@@snapsbyfox i got the lens, could You tell me what settings for Video You are using ? Mine is 0 and -2.
Great video and explanation. Much appreciated👌🏾
video is great. consider keeping your photos up a little longer. they are awesome so I keep pausing!
we want more reviews like this awesome
How have you found it on the XT5 Roman?
at the limit tbh... deffo a 2 handed operation
What you think of the 18-55 kit?
_"What you think of the 18-55 kit?
"_
It's an excellent lens and much better than any Canon or Nikon kit lens. If you're shooting an X-Trans II 16MP sensor, can live with the f/4 aperture on the long end and don't need weather resistance the XF 16-55mm f/2.8 is overkill. If you're using X-Trans III or IV sensor, printing large images and could use weather resistance the XF 16-55mm f/2.8 will make a difference. Because of the OIS the XF 18-55mm lens is a better choice for video.
@@brian-beeler Thank you! I have the 23mm and i think i'll be peeking the 18-55 used, it's almost 350 us.
Roman Fox Thank you ❤️❤️❤️
@@snapsbyfox Good thought. The XF 16-80mm is an excellent choice for video over the 18-55mm because it's weather resistant, has a longer reach, constant f/stop and I suspect a bit better build since it's WR rated. The only downsides are size and cost. The 16-55mm might be the most commonly found XF lens on the used market which has depressed its price making it a great deal whereas the 16-80mm on the used market still commands a high price. All told IMO if cost isn't an issue the 16-80mm would be the way to go.
Yes 12 years is good time to get to know any lens. 😆
I’ve had my Summilux 35mm f1.4 for 11 years - still works like new
So let me get this straight, you never look in the camera when you take street pictures? Do you take all your pictures at chest height with the screen? The last part is really nice to look at, good idea!
Like the way you are presenting your vids. I’m thinking of buying this lens for travel shooting. So far, I’ve been held back by the size and weight, but damn, the IQ is really good.
Roman Fox bought the 16-55 and shot with for an entire day in Amsterdam. First views seem excellent and the lens is really a pleasure to work with. Have a feeling I should have bought it way earlier😀
@@ozuidema How do you find the size/weight?
@@max-olson You know, it's funny, but the size & weight in practice are not bothering me at all. The handling of the lens is excellent and it feels good in the hand; better actually than the much lighter 18-55 kit lens. It also helps that, when zooming in, the lens extends only a little bit, whereas a lens like the 16-80 becomes twice as tall. Having said all that, I use this lens in combination with an XT2, which balances very nicely against the lens. I have also used it on the much smaller XT20, which is doable, but would never be my preferred choice.
@@ozuidema Interesting. I have the XT4, but really on the fence about the 16-55 or the 16-80, just seems like the gap in image quality might be worth the extra weight on the 16-55. What do you think?
@@max-olson The 16-80 is known to be soft at the end of the focal spectres, both wide-angle and tele. And some say that the corners are soft as well. The 16-55 is very sharp across the entire range. The workmanship is extraordinary; it's a red badge zoom and that's not just a marketing ploy; you will feel the difference immediately. For me, also important was the 2.8 versus 4.0. With the 16-55, I can shoot portraits at 2.8 at, say, 50mm (which is a focal length that I like a lot) and achieve good background separation. With the 16-80 at 4.0 you can achieve that too, but you need to back up a lot further, which is not always practical. Zooming in, the 16-80 extends a lot, which makes it more prone to dust suck. Finally, I had some doubt about the fact that the OIS turns off automatically when placed on a tripod; I prefer to be able to turn it off manually (although so far I have not read any complaints about that; time will tell). Of course, the 16-80 DOES have OIS, while the 16-55 does not. Since I hardly shoot any video, that does no bother me, but for you this might be different. To me, it's really an (easy) choice between a consumer travel lens and a pro standard zoom (if that does not sound too snobbish; I'm not a pro by any stretch of the imagination :)). Best buy of 2020.
can I vlog with this lens in autofocus mode with xt-4 ?
@@snapsbyfox very good to know
Man absolutely. The Autofocus with eye detect is near perfect! I’d say 95% of the time it will have you in focus.
It's smooth!!! No hunting
Eye/Face Tracking
Sensitivity 0
Speed -3
You can. If you are powerlifter
@@galachiev 😂
Were the photos at the end post-processed raws or straight out of camera?
@@snapsbyfox Thanks. I'm still trying to learn how to edit photos. I'm a beginner and hobbyist and your videos really help! I really want this lens but need to save up! I know I don't need it but it's more of an emotional "wanting". Seems sharp enough to keep up with some primes within it's range. Keep up the good work! :)
great steet pictures
If you think $1000 is a lot for a lens, check out canon 28-70 its $2700 and its pretty much an equivalent
Great video and love it that you dont do pixel peep reviews! I found it funny the way you showed the front of the lens in your video it looked like a front end of a gun!! Ive had this lens since released and i find that i dont have the confidence to use it for street photography due to its size!! And have you ever felt that using primes on the street is better for size,weight and stealth? I only use this lens for family events and maybe travel because of its size,whats your favourite focal length for Street photography?