Bitcoin Q&A: Orphaned Blocks and Stuck Transactions

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 окт 2024

Комментарии • 24

  • @LluisZardoyaClips
    @LluisZardoyaClips 2 месяца назад

    really interesting, thank you!

  • @lomokbernthurg9679
    @lomokbernthurg9679 3 года назад +1

    Good video , important info
    This means
    I can send bitcoin to your wallet with low fee and use RBF and the transaction is sent back to my wallet as long as it's not yet confirmed.
    What happens with the parent transaction.
    Will it disappear?
    To me , this kills the trust in the technology , this makes it possible to say a bitcoin transaction can be reversed.

  • @graphicdesignandwebsolutio365
    @graphicdesignandwebsolutio365 6 лет назад +1

    When creating transactions for pay role payments, since you mentioned it, would it be possible to handle that in one transactions with multiple outputs and wouldn't it be cheaper. would it pose any security risks in doing so, such as being able to figure out one of the cryptographic variables to get the private key. Also, are there any open source projects that you know that have a pay role payment generator (I have no idea what it would be called, sorry, hope I'm descriptive enough), I would definitely love to delve into this for my own business as well a decentralized platform as a service to make crypto pay role in general more convenient...

  • @ziomanzo
    @ziomanzo 6 лет назад +1

    bitcoin has 10min blocktime. In a blockchain with lower blocktime, you should have more stale blocks. does it make the chain less trust worthy? how are the odds to get a Tx rejected?

  • @chrisperrotta1828
    @chrisperrotta1828 6 лет назад +5

    What are your opinions on the progress of Bitcoin? Thoughts on bug CVE-2018-17144? Great videos, thank you for them

    • @rustyshackelford6372
      @rustyshackelford6372 6 лет назад

      Chris Perrotta I too would love to hear your dissection of the recent bugs

    • @fbafelipe7666
      @fbafelipe7666 6 лет назад

      Very interesting topic. It made me think that the fact that most full nodes run the bitcoin core implementation is a type of centralization, so a bug in this specific software is a central point of failure. Maybe it would be good to have more people running other full node implementations so a bug in one implementation is not a risk to the entire network.

  • @Metaroids
    @Metaroids 6 лет назад +1

    So much genius this guy is made of. Andreas is the reason I started a youtube channel and dedicated my time to helping my country (Philippines) learn about crypto

  • @kunleelabanjo8648
    @kunleelabanjo8648 3 года назад

    Please I need help here, I sent some Bitcoin cash from my Ledger Nano s to my coinbase account and the crypto never showed in my coinbase for the past 7 days. Here is what happened, on the leger platform I clicked sent BCH and on the coinbase platform I clicked receive BCH and copy the address to Ledger platform but on my Nano s, I selected Bitcoin while effecting the transfer. The transaction has been confirmed but I did not get the fund in my coinbase account. Any idea what to do from here or just assume the crypto is lost...??? please advise

  • @BartekCelary
    @BartekCelary 6 лет назад +1

    How about revoking a stuck transaction? And is it possible to replace by fee from a different wallet?

    • @EnsoReloaded
      @EnsoReloaded 6 лет назад +1

      Revoking a (broadcasted) transaction is not possible. Also you cannot enable RBF for a transaction that is already in the mempool.

    • @ernestolombardo5811
      @ernestolombardo5811 6 лет назад

      So June (I think that's the name Andreas said) is stuck with that stuck transaction? Yuck.

  • @Melvinnn11
    @Melvinnn11 6 лет назад

    I sent LTC from coinbase to my Trezor BTC wallet by mistake..... is there anything I can do to fix the problem? to me it just looks like my LTC disappeared.

  • @almwaysa
    @almwaysa 6 лет назад

    What is the incentive of mining zero fee transactions? why do they pass through eventually ?

    • @ElthrosXL
      @ElthrosXL 3 года назад

      2 years and no answers huh, damn

  • @nion456789
    @nion456789 6 лет назад +2

    Smashed the like

  • @worldstar7241
    @worldstar7241 6 лет назад +4

    come on. these aren't things users should care about. why aren't there any useful wallets with a nice interface yet? also most wallts have a way too high minimum transaction fee. sorry but as a non IT guy I just get mad as those things.

    • @ultimate2559
      @ultimate2559 6 лет назад

      You always have to draw a line between an easy to use wallet and one with a lot of advanced functionality. In my opinion Samurai Wallet does this the best by having a clean interface and enough features to do stuff like replace by fee. There is also wallets like BRD which prioritize ease of use over anything else which of course has its limitations.

  • @Tomyb15
    @Tomyb15 6 лет назад

    But you didn't say which wallet you use that let's you do that!

    • @EnsoReloaded
      @EnsoReloaded 6 лет назад +1

      6:17 Electrum and Samourai

    • @RobertDoosh
      @RobertDoosh 3 года назад

      @@EnsoReloaded And if you didn't send with a wallet that has that option, what can you do?

  • @mathieug.6855
    @mathieug.6855 6 лет назад

    1sat/byte works just fine using bitcoin cash (BCH) for me, always included in next block but i don't wait for that because we have 0-confirmation.