The China Syndrome (1979) Brains Over Spectacle [Movie Review]

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 дек 2024

Комментарии • 37

  • @alison4dice
    @alison4dice Год назад +1

    I thought the same thing David did at the mention of Wilford Brimley's name.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    My late father had a Fine Arts degree from Ohio University, so I'm loving your commentary. He died 30 years ago when I was 16. You guys would have been a great trio at breaking movies down

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    .....also, Jack Lemmon was known for "rambling" as a character. I loved his "despondence"...like when she asked him if he wanted cream and sugar in his coffee. OMG. What human element!! Her heart, her compassion

  • @borednow5838
    @borednow5838 Год назад

    Good review. I liked this one too. Its a bit of a forgotten 70s gem in a way. Jack Lemmon's part proves what a fine and diverse actor he was. He would already be a legend just based on his comedy roles, but the way he could transition into more dramatic roles and in a wide range of films was impressive.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад +1

    Disney Princess????? That's easy!!! Dude on the left, Snow White. Dude on the right, The Little Mermaid.....I'm SOOO kidding. That was completely random

    • @MildFuzzMovies
      @MildFuzzMovies  Год назад

      Thanks for all the thoughts, ha!

    • @adamjacobschmidt
      @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

      @@MildFuzzMovies Anytime. I hope I sound more humble than it probably seems. I'm just grateful to give food for thought to those who know all the whole lot more than I do.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    Hey!! Dude on the right. 52 mins in, remember that "back in the day", it wasn't a movie without a car chase lol...but I'm with you. You seem to have real affection for implication and ambiguity. I love it too

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    Wow!! 48 mins in. Great insight about the microwave. I saw a correlation, but you guys took it even deeper.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    1:02 in, Yes! I dated my city's local news anchor and we watched this together. She was so sweet and idealistic at 27yo.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    35 mins in, YES! Well said! They "held" shots. I never thought to word it like that.

  • @alison4dice
    @alison4dice Год назад

    In the late 70's not only did we not have internet, there were only 3 or 4 channels, so there really weren't that many different options.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    53 mions...Agreed! I liked how they ramped up the danger to contrast Jack's conviction for doing the right thing.

  • @alison4dice
    @alison4dice Год назад

    When that first TMNT movie came out, it was huge. I remember this b/c I worked in a movie theater, and it sold out the theater for the first weekend.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    31mins in, remember that Jack Lemmon was mostly a comedic actor. This movie had some of the best pure acting.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    "They haven't learned their lessons"...that's why I would like to assume that radiation was, in fact, released and trashed the whole plant

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    about 46 mins in, Yes! Totally! I think that what Brimley said at the end, was perhaps the "biggest" twist in the entire movie.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    Wow! Dude on the right. So 55mins in, my thoughts are that they didn't have to give Jack Lemmon more "material" because, as one the best pure actors of his day, he added to the material with facial expressions etc..

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    Thanks for the review btw

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    ...about 40 mins in, you mentioned JLemmons character. His character was a "Navy guy". I was in the US Navy nuclear power.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    That's my favorite comment!! "No one gives the Pacific Ocean enough credit for how massive it its" LMAO

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    Hey!! So, Yeah. 45 mins in, I want to share with you my thoughts. Personally, I think it's implied, at least as a possibility (from earlier dialogue) that the plant may have taken MUCH more significant damage...like the flooding of radiation! I say that because pipes and welds did in fact seem (visually) to rupture (although I don't remember steam). Personally, I enjoyed that thought because it added to the "justice" of greed.

  • @alison4dice
    @alison4dice Год назад

    The idea about putting a nuclear power plant (or prison or garbage dump or a million other things Americans are hypocritical about) is sometimes called NIMBY: not in my backyard.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    1:09, Agreed!! Dude on the left, right on.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    WTF? 44mins in, I never thought of that! I've seen this movie about 10 times. Thanks

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    Wow I'm only 12mins in. You guys are good.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    50 mins in, just off the cuff. I think of the microwave commercial also as a cynical type of "oh well. This danger/greediness marches on no matter what". But, yes. I never thought of the commercialization idea. Thanks

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    Jane Fonda is 42yo in this movie. RUclips Barbarella and Sunday In New York. She was bangin'!! No wonder she was the first "arm candy/trophy wife" to an ol' school billionaire, Ted Turner!

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    1:08 in. Yes! Remember that not all, or maybe "most" of this movie's technical babble is just that. Yes. It's inaccurate that the water is mixed with radiation or that a broken pump immediately leads to a radiation leak. Remember this movie is less about nuclear power and more about greed.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    60 mins in, I this Douglas' character was simply a "rebel". Also, he provided a shit load of foreshaddowing.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    1:05 in, Yes! ...about Michael Douglas, remember that those were "hippie days" (the 70s) so of course he was cynical etc.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    33mins in, YES. The movie is more about greed than anti-nuclear power

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    ..about 27 mins in, to go along with what you said about this movie "not making concessions", did you guys know that it's producer is thee Michael Douglas?

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    37 mins in, I disagree a bit. Jackovich is THEE villain of the movie, imo. (the guy who fudged the X-rays)

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    56 mins in, oh hell yeah. He was becoming despondent by rambling.

  • @adamjacobschmidt
    @adamjacobschmidt Год назад

    LMAO 54 mins, I would also "immediately be in my basement". Actually not true at all...I'd be in my car heading away