So tiny? It’s practically the same size as the z650 and z900. The seat height is just a few mm difference, yes mm’s. It’s light for sure, but I’ve ridden the z900, and a z400 and virtually no difference other that the z900 gets to 100kmh one whole second faster lol. Terrible review bud, keep trying.
@@TheCoolestCourier I have. Buddy has one, and has major buyer remorse. He took my z400 for a ride and cruised at 165km/h with ease he said, and great acceleration all for $5000 less. If people value getting to 100km/h a half second faster and an extra 45 km/ h top speed, spend the extra 5 grand lol, but like my buddy said I do everything he does for a lot less. Barely noticed a difference. I’m flat footed on both bikes.
@xDRAGOSLAVx It's a lot more than half a second. When I leave lights my Friends with Ninja 400s look like they're standing still in my mirrors. Nothing in the category accelerates like a Yamaha cp3. It's just magical. It's double the money, but it's a lot more than double the fun. I sold my CF Moto 450 after 4 months. I just couldn't do the little bike thing
@@TheCoolestCourier it’s 4.5. seconds to 3.7 seconds. It’s less than a second. You still have a little bike imo. Unless your riding a gsxr 1000, or an H2 etc…
@xDRAGOSLAVx You're thinking of The mt-07. Mt09 is 2.9 0 to 60. And it's one of the easiest bikes to do it on. I've never been beaten off the line. 0 to 80 as bike demolishes everything. Ask anyone who rides a liter bike if they can beat in mt-09 0 to 60. You must be a kid if you think sport bikes are quicker off the line than nakeds. Mt-09 and XSR 900 run a 10.8 quarter mile. In no world is that a little bike my guy lol
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
What windshield is it that you have on the Kawasaki Z 400?
Not my Kawasaki. I forgot which one he had
@@TheCoolestCourier Thank you
6:42 AYYYO
🤣
I don't know what you're talking about tiny, its the same size as the z900 sitting side by side.
So tiny? It’s practically the same size as the z650 and z900. The seat height is just a few mm difference, yes mm’s. It’s light for sure, but I’ve ridden the z900, and a z400 and virtually no difference other that the z900 gets to 100kmh one whole second faster lol. Terrible review bud, keep trying.
Swing a leg over an xsr900. Feels wayyy bigger
@@TheCoolestCourier I have. Buddy has one, and has major buyer remorse. He took my z400 for a ride and cruised at 165km/h with ease he said, and great acceleration all for $5000 less. If people value getting to 100km/h a half second faster and an extra 45 km/ h top speed, spend the extra 5 grand lol, but like my buddy said I do everything he does for a lot less. Barely noticed a difference. I’m flat footed on both bikes.
@xDRAGOSLAVx It's a lot more than half a second. When I leave lights my Friends with Ninja 400s look like they're standing still in my mirrors. Nothing in the category accelerates like a Yamaha cp3. It's just magical. It's double the money, but it's a lot more than double the fun. I sold my CF Moto 450 after 4 months. I just couldn't do the little bike thing
@@TheCoolestCourier it’s 4.5. seconds to 3.7 seconds. It’s less than a second. You still have a little bike imo. Unless your riding a gsxr 1000, or an H2 etc…
@xDRAGOSLAVx You're thinking of The mt-07. Mt09 is 2.9 0 to 60. And it's one of the easiest bikes to do it on. I've never been beaten off the line. 0 to 80 as bike demolishes everything. Ask anyone who rides a liter bike if they can beat in mt-09 0 to 60.
You must be a kid if you think sport bikes are quicker off the line than nakeds.
Mt-09 and XSR 900 run a 10.8 quarter mile. In no world is that a little bike my guy lol