I'm downloading your videos with interesting headlines now, before your channel is erased. "Being objective" is what Western censorship hates the most! Thanks for your work for as long as it lasted!
22:41 40% of Brussels population is Muslim? 😂 I generally agree with your take but you’re making yourself look so scientific and pragmatic with these takes when in fact it’s clear what you’re trying to push. As I stated in my other comment, only 5% of the Belgian population is Muslim and it is estimated that 40% of those Muslims live in Brussels. That’s a huge difference from what you state in the video and now I’m unsure if I can trust the rest.
The gaza war has lead to great escalation of all the problems and divides you have shown here and not measured fully yet. And it has some radical effects one may not have anticipated. It has made a rather large numbers of muslims show their radicalism or radicalized them in the first place - especially antisemitism. This now in germany lead to the center and even parts of the left to develop actual enfringement, fear and rejection of islam in europe as nothing is as unappetizing as antisemitism to germans (literally).
Muslims as a group have always been one of the largest voter blocks that vote for labour and other left wing parties ever since they arrived in the UK, every attempt of right wing social and economic policy has been done by the conservatives a party which muslims dont really vote for i dont know where you got your muslims are anti left from
I know a bisexual person who hates muslims because of muslims opinions of gay people. He makes sense here, but many other lgbt+ people supporting or being neutral to islam is weird.
But Europe does jail people over antisemitism. Some Muslims find it unfair that u can get jailed over saying something anti semitic, but saying something anti Muslim won't.
@@pinktfatrabbit israeli media reported that a Dutch guy got arrested by the Netherlands for wearing an anti Semitic shirt, yet israelis in the Netherlands shouting racist slurs towards Arabs or those burning the Quran and shouting hate towards Muslims were never arrested.
Because the ones who want their countries to stop being backward theocratic hellholes, stay and fight, the ones losing that battle, go to our countries.
If talking about the guestworkers, it was because it wasn't those that could "afford to westernize" -so to say- that needed to move for work. The migrants came in larger partd from more conservative rural regions, rather then from the wealthier and more progresive urban regions. But it's a country by country basis. Some muslim countries became more progressive while the disporia didn't, and oyher countried visa versa. I think, overall and in general, there's a bit of selection bias in thinking that arab countries are less fundamentalist than muslims from here on europe. Not saying that it doesn't happen tho
In my opinion, it’s partly because Muslims in “Muslim countries” tend to perceive themselves as fairly well off financially and don’t have to double down on a “Muslim” identity to fit into society. Western Muslims try to compensate for perceived failure to live up to religious ideals due to “modernity” and “secularism.”
May be it's their past karma making them do this. EU imperialists after wiping out entire cultures and civilisations around the world is reaching the same fate. 🙄🙄😤😤
Well it’s simple, Europe’s economies and corporations after world war 2 did not want to accept the economical disadvantage they were given and the future prospects not looking so as sunny as before, so they decided on migration and cheap labor to stabilize the economy by providing expandable minorities. No one thought long term, also ignorance and arrogance of what Islam is has brought such a predicament for future generations. Now almost every important economy and domestic politics in Europe is dependent on the migrant populace. So I would say good luck 👍🏼 and if you want to point fingers, point them to the generations that came before
I'm from Egypt. Christians here live in peace so far, although many Muslims don't like Christians, but they haven't been prosecuted in any way except maybe during the Islamist government in 2012, but it wasn't systematic. Nevertheless, you are right about the Christians in Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq. I don't really know much about Turkey, but I don't think they are oppressed there
I think a lot of the problems come from an ignorant view that all religions are the same. Many western politicians treat Islam like its effectively Christianity, whilst the two religions are very distinct in their principles, practises, and beliefs.
this omg the number of ignorant people i've heard spout the idea that in the end all religions are the same is unreal. peak western naivity. and we know where naivity usually leads people
"There will come a day that we will see far more radical extremists and terrorists coming out of Europe because of lack of decision making, trying to be politically correct or assuming that they know the Middle East, and they know Islam, and they know the others far better than we do, and I'm sorry, but that's pure ignorance" ~ UAE's 2017 prime minister, Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed
That argument would not be fruitful. Reason being how bloodless they were, indeed it is the reason why the region still has so many creeds, unlike any other place in the world until the modern era. Indeed it's the reason why people make a big deal out of the jizya forgetting that for the last several centuries the romans (and persians, both aggressive expansionist imperialists) extracted a far greater tax poll. The Muslims/Arabs were spread out far too thin to weather a local rebellion had it been as oppressive as apologists claim. Unlike the mongols who ruled a large spat of territory by eradicating the local populace while themselves being few in number, The Muslims were so few in numbers, especially compared to the urban settled populations conquered; That it was by just administration that they ruled the territories. The tribute under the commander who took Egypt, Amr ibn Alas for example was 12,000,000 dinars, Khaukianos, the last Byzantine prefect of Egypt levied 20,000,000 gold dinars. To compare, in order to take Gaul Caesar eradicated an estimate of half the population, inaddition during Roman rule of Egypt, Egypt was not regarded as part of the roman territory but as an asset and personal property of the emperor himself, thereby providing for nearly 2 thirds of the roman treasury, on the other hand during Muslim Rule not only had the soldiers not been allowed to enter liberated cities, they were not allowed to buy land or settle either. In Egypt for example, the caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab restored the Coptic pope Benjamin I (622-661) to his seat after he had been in exile for 13 years under the Byzantine emperor Heraclius. With regards to the conduct of the commander who took Egypt, Amr ibn Alas with the Coptic pope we have this accounts written by Severus of Ashmunein a coptic priest and historian: "Then Amr turned to him, and said to him: "Resume the government of all your churches and of your people, and administer their affairs. And if you will pray for me, that I may go to the West and to Pentapolis, and take possession of them, as I have of Egypt, and return to you in safety and speedily, I will do for you all that you shall ask of me." Then the holy Benjamin prayed for Amr, and pronounced an eloquent discourse, which made Amr and those present with him marvel, and which contained words of exhortation and much profit for those that heard him; and he revealed certain matters to Amr, and departed from his presence honored and revered. And all that the blessed father said to the commander Amr, he found true, and not a letter of it was unfulfilled." -History of the Patriarchs of Alexandria Amr, upon the request of the Caliph Umar, asked the Patriarch Benjamin what was the best way of keeping the country in order and raising the revenue. The conditions laid down by the Patriarch were these: (1) that the taxes should be collected at the right time (the end of the agricultural season) (2) that no taxes should be demanded after the vintage; (3) that the canals should be dug out yearly; (4) that the dykes and sluice-gates should be kept in repair; (5) that no unjust or tyrannical official should be appointed. The Chronicle of John, Bishop of Nikiu writes about Amr "And he exacted the taxes which had been determined upon, but he took none of the property of the Churches, and he committed no act of spoliation or plunder, and he preserved them throughout all his days.", He writes in a later section regarding the city of Alexandria and that its previous unjust governor Menas had the pol tax of the city to be 32,057 gold dinars while Amr deposed him for a person loved by the people that had been exiled by Heraclius named John and had it set at 22,000. Regarding the appointment he writes "Now he had been appointed prefect of the city of Alexandria when Amr entered it. And this John had compassion on the poor, and gave generously to them out of his possessions. And seeing their affliction he had mercy upon them, and wept over their lot. Amr deposed Menas and appointed John in his stead." Ibn `Abd al Hakam (187 - 257 A.H/ 800-871 C.E ) writes that when `Amr was firmly established, he made the Copts pay a similar tribute to that exacted by the Romans, but it was to fluctuate in proportion to their wealth and prosperity. This can only mean that he continued the Roman system of land-tax: for the poll-tax imposed by the Arabs was a fixed payment, while undoubtedly the land-tax varied in accordance with the rise of the Nile and the general conditions of agriculture. Ibn `Abd al Hakam goes on to say that it was the duty of the village headmen to meet and examine into the state of agriculture, and to distribute the burden of taxation accordingly. They were in fact a sort of local commissioners for the assessment of the land-tax. Any surplus above the prescribed amount was to be expended on local improvements, and a portion of land in every township was set aside to provide a fund for the maintenance of public buildings, such as churches and baths. Any hospitality which the Muslims claimed of right from the Copts was to be taken into account (see History of the Caliphs by Al-Suyuti) While the Roman system of registration and of collection was partially continued, the taxation fixed under treaty by the Arabs was both less vexatious and less burdensome than that of the Romans. The treaty constituting under the first article a general security was given for the life, property, and churches of the Egyptians, who were also to be allowed the free exercise of their religion. For the payment of tribute and taxes constituted them a protected people ('ahl adh dhimmah',literally 'the people to whom one is bound to by honor of an agreement') with a status implying these privileges. The tribute was fixed at two dinârs per head for all except very old men and children, and the total tax was found to amount to 12m dinârs" Contrast that with the Al-Muqawqis, the last Byzantine prefect of Egypt who levied 20m dinars. That the early government of `Amr was animated by a spirit of justice and even sympathy for the subject population, can hardly be questioned. But this was not an isolated case, Wardan when ordered by the later Caliph Mu'awiah to increase the tribute levied on the Copts, he answered that it was impossible owing to the terms of the treaty. Al-Mawardi ( 364 - 450 H /974-1058 CE), a jurist says, `There is a dispute among jurists as to the amount of the jiziah. According to Abu Hanifah ( 80 - 150 H / 697-767CE) there are three different amounts: (1) from the rich are due forty-eight dirhems; (2) from the middle-class twenty-four; (3) from the poor twelve. These sums he gives as the maximum and the minimum, and he forbids governors to exercise their own discretion as to the amount.' It is impossible to read him without being struck by admiration for the extraordinary sense of justice and fairness which animates the theory and system of taxation he is describing: " Even when a protected people breaks its treaty by refusing payment of tribute, it is not lawful to kill them, or to rob them, or to take their children, so long as they abstain from violence such rebels, however, must be given a safe-conduct and quit the territory of Islam; and if they refuse to depart voluntarily, they must be ejected by force. '" There are texts from the 800's CE debating whether, if one for example were to take a log of wood that was not theirs, make a column out of it and have it as a foundation of a house, later the original owner of the column comes back and demands the log to be retrieved into his custody and refuse monetary compensation ought the judge comply, tear down the structure and give him the log or ought he enforce a monetary compensation. this was 1200 years. Property rights were taken that seriously, you could not simply handwave it and enforce a monetary compensation as that property in question was not attained by proper channels, hence it' s ownership and how much ought be the compensation for it is judicated by its owner and no one else has the right to, not the governor or even the caliph. Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Europe is halfway into digging its own grave with the way topics like these being swept under the rug due to fear of being 'politically correct', lecturing the rest of the world against 'islamophobia' while being silently consumed by the same. My heart is with the women and children of Europe for the soft targets would be the ones affected most in the coming years.
Okay but did you know the Quran your Holy book tells you to go to the Enjils and Tawrat the first 5 books of the Hebrew Bible Torah and the New testament Gospels Written by Jesus eye witnesses Matthew , Mark , Luke and John. Jesus claimed to be God as well as accepting worship. The Messiah who the Quran says Jesus is it makes more sense the Messiah would be God only God can forgive sins , heal , cast out demons , raise the dead ect. The first 5 books of the Torah Genesis , Exodus , Leviticus , Numbers and Deuteronomy written by the prophet Moses. John 1:14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son[a] from the Father, full of grace and truth. John 8:58 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.” John 10:30 I and the Father are one.” John 20:28 Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God!” Matthew 1:23 23 “Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel” (which means, God with us). Matthew 18:20 For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them.” Matthew 28:18 18 And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Matthew 28:9 And behold, Jesus met them and said, “Greetings!” And they came up and took hold of his feet and worshiped him. Matthew 2:11 And going into the house, they saw the child with Mary his mother, and they fell down and worshiped him. Then, opening their treasures, they offered him gifts, gold and frankincense and myrrh. John 14:10 10 Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own authority, but the Father who dwells in me does his works. Mark 2:5-7 [5]When Jesus saw their faith, He said to the paralytic, “Son, your sins are forgiven you.” [6]And some of the scribes were sitting there and reasoning in their hearts, [7]“Why does this Man speak blasphemies like this? Who can forgive sins but God alone?” Luke 5 : 20 Seeing their faith, Jesus said, “Friend, your sins are forgiven.” John 8 : 12 When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.” John 10 : 11 "I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. John 10 : 7 Therefore Jesus said again, "Very truly I tell you, I am the gate for the sheep. John 14:6 [6]Jesus told him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me. John 15:1 "I am the true vine, and my Father is the vine grower". John 9:38 38 He said, “Lord, I believe,” and he worshiped him. John 6:35 "I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me shall not hunger, and whoever believes in me shall never thirst" John 1:3 3 All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. Exodus 3:14 14 God said to Moses, “I am who I am.”[a] And he said, “Say this to the people of Israel: ‘I am has sent me to you.’” Matthew 28:19 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in[a] the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, John 10:28-30 28 I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. 29 My Father, who has given them to me,[a] is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father's hand. 30 I and the Father are one.” Genesis 1:27 27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. Genesis 1:26-27 26 Then God said, “Let us make man[a] in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” Genesis 9:6 6 “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image. Genesis 5:1 5 This is the book of the generations of Adam. When God created man, he made him in the likeness of God. Leviticus 17:11 11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it for you on the altar to make atonement for your souls, for it is the blood that makes atonement by the life. Exodus 30:10 10 Aaron shall make atonement on its horns once a year. With the blood of the sin offering of atonement he shall make atonement for it once in the year throughout your generations. It is most holy to the Lord.” Luke 23:33 33 And when they came to the place that is called The Skull, there they crucified him, and the criminals, one on his right and one on his left. Mark 15:25 25 And it was the third hour[a] when they crucified him. John 11:25 25 Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life.[a] Whoever believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, Luke 24:6-7 6 He is not here, but has risen. Remember how he told you, while he was still in Galilee, 7 that the Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men and be crucified and on the third day rise.” Matthew 28:5-6 5 But the angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you seek Jesus who was crucified. 6 He is not here, for he has risen, as he said. Come, see the place where he[a] lay. Deuteronomy 32:39-41 “See now that I myself am he! There is no god besides me. I put to death and I bring to life, I have wounded and I will heal, and no one can deliver out of my hand. I lift my hand to heaven and solemnly swear: As surely as I live forever, when I sharpen my flashing sword and my hand grasps it in judgment, I will take vengeance on my adversaries and repay those who hate me. Numbers 24:17 I shall see him, but not now: I shall behold him, but not nigh: there shall come a Star out of Jacob, and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel, and shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Sheth Matthew 13:24-30 24 He put another parable before them, saying, “The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a man who sowed good seed in his field, 25 but while his men were sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds[a] among the wheat and went away. 26 So when the plants came up and bore grain, then the weeds appeared also. 27 And the servants[b] of the master of the house came and said to him, ‘Master, did you not sow good seed in your field? How then does it have weeds?’ 28 He said to them, ‘An enemy has done this.’ So the servants said to him, ‘Then do you want us to go and gather them?’ 29 But he said, ‘No, lest in gathering the weeds you root up the wheat along with them. 30 Let both grow together until the harvest, and at harvest time I will tell the reapers, “Gather the weeds first and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my barn.”’” Luke 7:11-17 11 Soon afterward[a] he went to a town called Nain, and his disciples and a great crowd went with him. 12 As he drew near to the gate of the town, behold, a man who had died was being carried out, the only son of his mother, and she was a widow, and a considerable crowd from the town was with her. 13 And when the Lord saw her, he had compassion on her and said to her, “Do not weep.” 14 Then he came up and touched the bier, and the bearers stood still. And he said, “Young man, I say to you, arise.” 15 And the dead man sat up and began to speak, and Jesus[b] gave him to his mother. 16 Fear seized them all, and they glorified God, saying, “A great prophet has arisen among us!” and “God has visited his people!” 17 And this report about him spread through the whole of Judea and all the surrounding country.
UK is getting left behind. We keep hearing how welcoming we are to immigrants compared to other European countries. Perhaps we are better mannered and do not insult Muslims to their face but we whisper to one another. Muslims think we are soft and a pushover. No wonder thousands are on Frances shore waiting for an opportunity to cross the channel. Poland only has 0.25% Muslims and a new law in place that allows border guards to shoot any migrant attempting to cross border.
Just personal experience as a tourist travelling from New Zealand. When I first arrived in the UK I started scrolling through instagram reels and started to get UK content coming up. One of the first reels to come up was an Iranian teenager who would go around annoying police, but many of his reels were of him filming and basically harassing trans or gay people in public. Most of the comments were written in Arabic and were supporting what he was doing.
Famous words of UAE's Highness Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan in 2017 :: "There will come a day that we will see far more radical extremists and terrorists coming out of Europe because of lack of decision-making, trying to be politically correct or assuming that they know the Middle East, they know Islam and they know the others far better than we do. And I am sorry but that's pure ignorance." It seems he was correct about European politicians.
@@TheSam661being a monarch in a Muslim country he should probably say the opposite to stay in power, not saying he s necessarily right but saying that doesn't really help him.
Makes sense since Christendom was always the empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts. Constantine chose regularly to refer to himself as the “attendant of God” (famulus dei/therapon tou theou) in official writings. By the fifth century, this metaphor of subordination had been redeployed from theological to political contexts as the subjects of the emperor came to refer to themselves as “slaves of the emperor.” And by the sixth, Justinian insisted all his officials swear an oath that they would demonstrate their service to the emperor “with genuine slavehood” (gnesia douleia).b Building on Paul’s revalorization of the vocabulary of slavery, and particularly the word doulos came to be applied to a variety of hierarchical relationships, even as it also continued to be used specifically of chattel slaves. By the middle Byzantine period, this expansion of the semantic range of the root doul- eventually gave the abstract nominal form douleia, meaning laborer Insofar as everyone who partook in labor was considered to be a participant This epistemological world view is coherent with master-slave dynamic relationship between the head of the state and his subjects, or rather slaves. The word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses: “Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9 “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”-1 Samuel 15:3 “Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.”-Hosea 13:16 The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers: “in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.” Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as:: “seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.” Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed: "Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer". Evoking several of these verses in practice: - (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. - (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them... - (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary. This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished. This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah): "includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit."
This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship." It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children." بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة "To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause" -Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah: حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ» "Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries" حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ» سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ» "The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly" This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them. Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". both the renessiance and the european enlightenment were directly preceded by massive translation movements form Arabic (see the Republic of Letters by Alexander Bevilacqua, The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization By: Jonathan Lyons. The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@@ikk_ikk again taqiya. its well know that christianity were persecuted by romans for almost 300 years. constantine never enforced christianity to his subjects, he only acknowledge christianity as one of the Empire`s religion thus ending the persecutions. it is Theodosius who make christianity the state religion but even him not enforcing christianity to his subjects. ur religion on the other hand spread by war, by conquering middle east and sahara and using all means to enforce ur religion to populance so much so that most people in this region forget who they really are and now think they are Arabs
I love how Muslims being a majority in the near-ish future in Europe is treated as a crazy conspiracy by what feels like half the channels on yt, while the other half just calmly treats it as a statistical fact
if Europe makes it easier for latinos to migrate that wont happen, they have high birthrates plus are way more eager to integrate. Same for people form the filipines, thailand, vietnam...
Okay but did you know the Quran your Holy book tells you to go to the Enjils and Tawrat the first 5 books of the Hebrew Bible Torah and the New testament Gospels Written by Jesus eye witnesses Matthew , Mark , Luke and John. Jesus claimed to be God as well as accepting worship. The Messiah who the Quran says Jesus is it makes more sense the Messiah would be God only God can forgive sins , heal , cast out demons , raise the dead ect. The first 5 books of the Torah Genesis , Exodus , Leviticus , Numbers and Deuteronomy written by the prophet Moses. John 1:14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son[a] from the Father, full of grace and truth. John 8:58 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.” John 10:30 I and the Father are one.” John 20:28 Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God!” Matthew 1:23 23 “Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel” (which means, God with us). Matthew 18:20 For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them.” Matthew 28:18 18 And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Matthew 28:9 And behold, Jesus met them and said, “Greetings!” And they came up and took hold of his feet and worshiped him. Matthew 2:11 And going into the house, they saw the child with Mary his mother, and they fell down and worshiped him. Then, opening their treasures, they offered him gifts, gold and frankincense and myrrh. John 14:10 10 Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own authority, but the Father who dwells in me does his works. Mark 2:5-7 [5]When Jesus saw their faith, He said to the paralytic, “Son, your sins are forgiven you.” [6]And some of the scribes were sitting there and reasoning in their hearts, [7]“Why does this Man speak blasphemies like this? Who can forgive sins but God alone?” Luke 5 : 20 Seeing their faith, Jesus said, “Friend, your sins are forgiven.” John 8 : 12 When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.” John 10 : 11 "I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. John 10 : 7 Therefore Jesus said again, "Very truly I tell you, I am the gate for the sheep. John 14:6 [6]Jesus told him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me. John 15:1 "I am the true vine, and my Father is the vine grower". John 9:38 38 He said, “Lord, I believe,” and he worshiped him. John 6:35 "I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me shall not hunger, and whoever believes in me shall never thirst" John 1:3 3 All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. Exodus 3:14 14 God said to Moses, “I am who I am.”[a] And he said, “Say this to the people of Israel: ‘I am has sent me to you.’” Matthew 28:19 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in[a] the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, John 10:28-30 28 I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. 29 My Father, who has given them to me,[a] is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father's hand. 30 I and the Father are one.” Genesis 1:27 27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. Genesis 1:26-27 26 Then God said, “Let us make man[a] in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” Genesis 9:6 6 “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image. Genesis 5:1 5 This is the book of the generations of Adam. When God created man, he made him in the likeness of God. Leviticus 17:11 11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it for you on the altar to make atonement for your souls, for it is the blood that makes atonement by the life. Exodus 30:10 10 Aaron shall make atonement on its horns once a year. With the blood of the sin offering of atonement he shall make atonement for it once in the year throughout your generations. It is most holy to the Lord.” Luke 23:33 33 And when they came to the place that is called The Skull, there they crucified him, and the criminals, one on his right and one on his left. Mark 15:25 25 And it was the third hour[a] when they crucified him. John 11:25 25 Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life.[a] Whoever believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, Luke 24:6-7 6 He is not here, but has risen. Remember how he told you, while he was still in Galilee, 7 that the Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men and be crucified and on the third day rise.” Matthew 28:5-6 5 But the angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you seek Jesus who was crucified. 6 He is not here, for he has risen, as he said. Come, see the place where he[a] lay. Deuteronomy 32:39-41 “See now that I myself am he! There is no god besides me. I put to death and I bring to life, I have wounded and I will heal, and no one can deliver out of my hand. I lift my hand to heaven and solemnly swear: As surely as I live forever, when I sharpen my flashing sword and my hand grasps it in judgment, I will take vengeance on my adversaries and repay those who hate me. Numbers 24:17 I shall see him, but not now: I shall behold him, but not nigh: there shall come a Star out of Jacob, and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel, and shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Sheth Matthew 13:24-30 24 He put another parable before them, saying, “The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a man who sowed good seed in his field, 25 but while his men were sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds[a] among the wheat and went away. 26 So when the plants came up and bore grain, then the weeds appeared also. 27 And the servants[b] of the master of the house came and said to him, ‘Master, did you not sow good seed in your field? How then does it have weeds?’ 28 He said to them, ‘An enemy has done this.’ So the servants said to him, ‘Then do you want us to go and gather them?’ 29 But he said, ‘No, lest in gathering the weeds you root up the wheat along with them. 30 Let both grow together until the harvest, and at harvest time I will tell the reapers, “Gather the weeds first and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my barn.”’” Luke 7:11-17 11 Soon afterward[a] he went to a town called Nain, and his disciples and a great crowd went with him. 12 As he drew near to the gate of the town, behold, a man who had died was being carried out, the only son of his mother, and she was a widow, and a considerable crowd from the town was with her. 13 And when the Lord saw her, he had compassion on her and said to her, “Do not weep.” 14 Then he came up and touched the bier, and the bearers stood still. And he said, “Young man, I say to you, arise.” 15 And the dead man sat up and began to speak, and Jesus[b] gave him to his mother. 16 Fear seized them all, and they glorified God, saying, “A great prophet has arisen among us!” and “God has visited his people!” 17 And this report about him spread through the whole of Judea and all the surrounding country.
As a Muslim in the Middle East, I was very shocked when I went to Europe and saw the way that many Muslims and those from my region are living and behaving there. It was such a shock and a disappointment because it felt like they brought with them the worst possible aspects of our societies and religion and very few, if any, of the good behaviors. Moreover, most of them think that they’re doing Europe a favor by going there because Europe doesn’t have enough workers (even though the ones I know were Uber drivers)! And funnily enough, like you mentioned radicalism and extremism are heavily in the Middle East, yet it felt virtually nonexistent in the West…
Christendom was always the empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts. Constantine chose regularly to refer to himself as the “attendant of God” (famulus dei/therapon tou theou) in official writings. By the fifth century, this metaphor of subordination had been redeployed from theological to political contexts as the subjects of the emperor came to refer to themselves as “slaves of the emperor.” And by the sixth, Justinian insisted all his officials swear an oath that they would demonstrate their service to the emperor “with genuine slavehood” (gnesia douleia).b Building on Paul’s revalorization of the vocabulary of slavery, and particularly the word doulos came to be applied to a variety of hierarchical relationships, even as it also continued to be used specifically of chattel slaves. By the middle Byzantine period, this expansion of the semantic range of the root doul- eventually gave the abstract nominal form douleia, meaning laborer Insofar as everyone who partook in labor was considered to be a participant This epistemological world view is coherent with master-slave dynamic relationship between the head of the state and his subjects, or rather slaves. The word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses: “Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9 “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”-1 Samuel 15:3 “Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.”-Hosea 13:16 The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers: “in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.” Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as:: “seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.” Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed: "Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer". Evoking several of these verses in practice: - (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. - (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them... - (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary. This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished. This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah): "includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit."
This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship." It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children." بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة "To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause" -Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah: حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ» "Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries" حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ» سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ» "The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly" This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them. Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". both the renessiance and the european enlightenment were directly preceded by massive translation movements form Arabic (see the Republic of Letters by Alexander Bevilacqua, The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization By: Jonathan Lyons. The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@ikk_ikk "There was a man in Dayr Abu Salamah who was from the Basrah region, and he was impudent and reckless. It was mentioned that he had a Siwak (toothstick) and was without virtue. He said, 'By Allah, I only use the Siwak in my exit area,' meaning his anus. So he took the Siwak and put it in his exit area and then pulled it out. He carried on like this for the ensuing nine months. He then gave birth to a child resembling a rat with four legs. It had a head like the head of a fish, and it had a rear end like the rear end of a rabbit. When he gave birth, this creature screamed three times. So the man's daughter got up and crushed its head, and it died. This man lived for two days after giving birth to it, and he died on the third. He said, 'This creature has killed me and slashed my bowels.' A group of people in that region witnessed this, as did orators from that place. Some of them saw that creature alive before it died, and some of them saw it after its death." Ibn Kathir, Al-Bidayah wa'l-Nihayah 17/470-471
How Islam changed the German landscape: - road blocks in front of christmas fairs (finally i am safe!) - knife ban zones (finally i am safe!) - more barber shops (finally i can have the same hairstyle as the 25 customers before me)
It is very difficult to navigate this subject while staying neutral. I think the majority of people are not racist and wish for muslims in Europe to be happy and successful but also feel there is a real problem with Islam in Europe and they don't know how to put these two things together. Thank you for not being a coward and having the courage to make this video. It shows reacl character on your part.
I appreciate Europeans who oppose and criticise us, but aren't hateful or discriminatory towards us. Media is radicalising people, which further makes any compromise harder and integration as well.
Denmark reintroduced it after Muslim riots in their country. Europe is obviously already desecularazing. It's not big as of yet and I wouldn't say there gonna be some huge turn on it but Europe is obviously less secular nowadays than 20 years ago and this trend will definitely continue to avoid civil turmoils.
i think the solution is to make and support moderate islamic institution that get along with the government. Government could push the organisation to abide by the state rule. also, thing get kinda complicated when the muslim want to solve their problem based on islamic rule, namely divorcing, inheritance and so on, in indonesia we have separate judicial system, civil one and the religious law. Islamic court could giving recommendation on the civil court to get thing in islamic pov get done, in that manner, muslim are not complaining against the state or even think to overthrow the country to establish the caliphs. On the constrast, european right wing government are against the muslim people and not accomodating their need, european nationalism is based on ethnic, cultural, and religious values of european people that doesnt accomodating another. European country should consider to lay its foundation on diversity, unity on diversity. u cannot force a believe to another people, nor another could do it to u, and i think its became main problem in europe.
Then ban the religion. This is what Islam fundamentally preaches, and the vast majority of scholars would agree. Secularism doesn't work with Islam because it has at its core political aspects, unlike for example Christianity. Moderates Muslims simply choose to ignore that fact but that doesn't change it. Secularism and the idea of freedom of religion make sense in a country dominated by irreligion or an apolitical religion, not with a political one.
@@ahmadsulthanaqila4669 there is a strong wish in some circles for the alternative: kick the others out. The european populist right's ideas are similar, at times copycat from across the pond. Not only will they not cooperate, they'll employ force, and most european governments are absolutely capable to do that at least partially. The question is of course risen, as all the immigration in the West has taken place under largely the same states and laws in force today. The same states themselves opened the borders, not some outside force.
@@ginismoja2459 a temporary fix to a issue that doesnt exist, have you ever thought of what was the root cause of radical islam? the persecution of muslims.. you're actively seeking out issues and complaining when issues arise
dont bomb muslim countries and leave them since your allies seem to want to 'free' us from terrorism in our own countries then we can go back. You started the problem, then complained about the problem that you started then blame us for your problem. Im shocked about how little you people know about Islam, especially because you think islam=kill non-believers and non-believers
Some small corrections: 22:41 - I say that 40% of Brussels population is muslim, that number is actually 20% (40% is the share of Belgian Muslims living in Brussels)
Cool thumbnail there. It says “Into Europe man is a funny dude” in Arabic. Edit: in all seriousness, it says something to the effect of “this is an Arabic text to make for a cool thumbnail.” But you people fell for my pro-Into Europe propaganda.
Decent video bro, but I'm sorry you (channel owner) are falling right into the "zero sum game" playing field. We all know your narrative ends with the result of putting down one side and uplifting the other side and that could result in world war 3. Many western country in the world are profiting by mass producing weapon and much of those were sold in the proxy country that has conflicts in the middle of muslim region, and when the refugees of the conflicted muslim region immigrate to western country, they made an anti immigration policy. Now I have a suggestion of solution, let's made a policy to ban any export of weapon to any country that has any conflict / potential conflict / recent history of conflict with muslim country, what is your opinion?
great video AI Summary: 6:32 French Statistic 2023 62% muslim agreed french law are above sharia law 43% muslim age 15-24 agreed french law are above sharia law 6:42 89% muslim condemn the assasination of Dominique Bernard eventough he did the blasphemy against Islam (Google it) 6:49 92% muslim in school condemn the assasination of Dominique Bernard eventough he did the blasphemy against Islam (Google it) 31% muslim in school do not condemn the assasination of Dominique Bernard eventough he did the blasphemy against Islam (Google it) This statistic doesn't make sense 7:14 Germany statistic 2022 33% Muslim agreed that law is above Quran 65% Muslim do not agree the violence for blasphemy 82% Muslim do not agree that violence justified if it advance Islam 63.5% Muslim do not want sharia law 54% Muslim do not want theocratic Government 7:31 UK statistic British Muslim all Gender age education and nativity do not desire in ending Cristianity's traditional role by removing the church of England as the established church of the nation 7:44 Hamburg Around 1,000 people joined Saturday's rally, which was organized by associations including "Kulterbrücke" (Cultural Bridge) and "Säkularer Islam" (Secular Islam). The Saturday's pro-democracy rally was peaceful. Dutch leader of anti-Muslim organisation Pegida sets Koran on fire May 2024. Wagensveld wore a shirt that read "Islam is no better than Nazism". 8:07 UK Terrorism statistic From 1970 to 1979, From 1981 to 1983, From 1989 to 1994, From 1997 to 2003, From 2006 to 2011 and 2013 there is almost no cases of Islam inspired/Jihadist terrorism. There is rise in terrorism exactly one year after falsely claimed 2003 West country vs Iraq war.
8:11 Europol Terrorist arrest Rise in terrorism prior to US Iran tension and sanction 2 years before 8:38 Comparing Muslim Youth in Belgium, England, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden None of the muslim youth say that national identity is not important 9:41 - 10:50 1 minute 9 second of west reject Islam argument 10:51 - 18:55 8 minute 4 second of Islam reject west argument 19:05 Speaker in the video hope Islam to be another Christian, because Islam is not modern, not secular, not humanist, and not enlightened 19:45 Speaker do not want Muslim to have any strategy or future outside of Islamic world 19:50 Speaker do not want Muslim to safeguard any identity, spirituality, morality, and distinguishibility 20:01 Speaker said Islam in Europe has been watered with copious amount of petrodollar and has taken roots 20:05 Speaker do not want Saudi Arabia to spend any money to promote Islam to the world; financing school, mosque, and cultural center. Speaker said this would put Russia to shame 20:25 Speaker do not want European Union to have any ties with Turkiye and do not want any report about Islamophobia 20:36 Speaker told the existence of dangerous Islamic Brotherhood then jump to a French book Le Frérisme et ses réseaux by Florence Bergeaud-Blackler that there is brotherhood/brotherism in Muslim so he conclude that all Muslim in Europe is Islamic Brotherhood
22:07 Speaker do not want any mosque in Europe 22:12 Foreign Minister and ÖVP leader Sebastian Kurz presented the research "Rolle der Moschee im Integrationsprozess" report that there should be no general suspicion against Muslims or mosques. "But we must not look away when there are religious communities that do not comply with the Islamic law." 22:26 Speaker do not want any Sharia or anything Islamic at all to be taught in mosque which is Islamic house of prayer 22:39 Speaker said Brussels Muslim is 40% of population (no accountable source of information on this) 22:57 Speaker do not want any minority media or Islam content on tiktok 23:00 Speaker do not want anything halal 23:03 Speaker shows Tiktok content, expressing speaker's love of anything haram 23:10 - 27:42 European government policy 27:49 Speaker wants significant reaction like In India such as reviving certain religion superiority, destroying mosque, ethnic backlash/tension, destroying community 28:00 Speaker wants a step further in destroying mosque, severe mass detention, and prohibition on the right to be born 28:27 Singapore coexistence policy 30:40 Speaker said Muslim is against women right 31:04 Speaker said Muslim focus on minority right and foreign policy and compromising the rest 35:23 intellectual justification to avoid critics
It says "this is only an Arabic text so that it would appear great in the thumbnail" \ هذا مجردنص عربي ليبدوا رائعاً في الصورة المصغرة Christendom was always an empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts. Constantine chose regularly to refer to himself as the “servant of God” (famulus dei/therapon tou theou) in official writings. By the fifth century, this metaphor of subordination had been redeployed from theological to political contexts as the subjects of the emperor came to refer to themselves as “slaves of the emperor.” And by the sixth, Justinian insisted all his officials swear an oath that they would demonstrate their service to the emperor “with genuine slavehood” (gnesia douleia).b Building on Paul’s revalorization of the vocabulary of slavery, and particularly the word doulos came to be applied to a variety of hierarchical relationships, even as it also continued to be used specifically of chattel slaves. By the middle Byzantine period, this expansion of the semantic range of the root doul- eventually gave the abstract nominal form douleia, meaning laborer Insofar as everyone who partook in labor was considered to be a participant This epistemological world view is coherent with master-slave dynamic relationship between the head of the state and his subjects, or rather slaves. The word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses: “Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9 “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”-1 Samuel 15:3 “Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.”-Hosea 13:16 The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers: “in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.” Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as:: “seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.” Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed: "Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer". Evoking several of these verses in practice: - (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. - (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them... - (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary. This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished. This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah): "includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit." This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship." It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children." بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة "To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause" -Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah: حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ» "Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries" حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ» سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ» "The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly" This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them. Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". both the renessiance and the european enlightenment were directly preceded by massive translation movements form Arabic (see the Republic of Letters by Alexander Bevilacqua, The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization By: Jonathan Lyons. The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Muslims in the comment section are trying hard to explain what Islam is, what Muslims are actually like, how the video is wrong about Muslims, and so on. Do they really think Europeans care about all that? For Europeans, their only concern is their own safety and preserving their way of life. It’s about collective self-defense. When preparing for self-defense, you don’t focus too much on the background of a potential threat, only enough to ensure your safety.
What muslims want to be, think they are is very different from what they actually are. We are in a collective societal cognitive dissonance when it comes to this one specific religion.
well congrats, your only destination is probably the moon or some deserted island, Sharia laws are 90% personal life day to day average joe muslim, practising good hygiene? sharia law, you see someone praying or making Dua? sharia law is in play, you planted a tree, fed the needy, or donated charity?? congrats, that's also sharia law, you were good to your parents, family, neighbours? that's multiple sharia laws at play... and even the DPRK has muslims, so.... now what??
Belgian here, moved to sweden recently. Started going to SFI ( swedish for immigrants, free Swedish lessons) people from all over the world in my class, including a guy from syria. He seemed nice, always willing to chat, saying hello, etc.. He moved away to Gothenburg last week and now girls ( the non- muslim ones) have come out, apparently he has been sending them videos of islam preachers( like the ones in the video), quotes from koran etc.. Gives me a eerie feeling knowing people like are freely walking the streets here.
i feel like there's nothing really wrong with that, unless they told him that they would like him to stop/were not interested in the religion, i know it comes out of good intentions from the guy your mentioning, as it's taught in islam to try and help everyone convert to the religion for them to go to heaven
None wanted this, none gave any hint they wanted it. They were so frightened they only dared to mentioned it after he was gone.. Also why bother with heaven after death ? Why not make it here, now.. Forcing your religion on others does not seem like it comes from “good intentions”. It looks very arrogant.. like “i know what is best for you, more than you know yourself”
one thing, you colonised our lands, plundered them, backed terrorism, and made our lives unbearable, and now you call us radical and the colonisers when we're escaping this oppression?
As a Muslim living in Muslim-majority Indonesia, it's very much funny how Islam in Europe is filled to the brim with many radical salafists that advocate for Sharia as criminal law. Indonesia is not perfect, but moderate Islam here has succeeded significantly in comparison to those within the EU as we have major organizations promoting this through debate and dialogue against these radical aspects (NU, Muhammadiyah). the Salafist doctrine of a conservative approach of Al-Wala' wal-Bara' (loyalty and disavowal) has been one the key factors that make them segregate themselves from any country in which their doctrine is not native, including Indonesia. Singapore's approach into regulating Islam is what I believe fits most towards the EU, diversity of moderatism in the form of centralization by hiring Islamic experts that is in touch with the broader community, promoting moderatism while at the same time beneficial for both the Muslims and the overall society. I also think it's funny that Islamists group up with left-wing parties within Europe solely because of the Palestinian issue, even though the vast majority agree with right-leaning policies. This issue really is about human rights, and within Indonesia whether it is left, right or center, whether Muslim or not, we advocate for a square deal. Then again, I personally don't have a stake here, and I really wish the best for my European friends.
Didn't Indonesia ban extramarital sex recently? Some countries may be a bit less radical, but they are all a ticking time bomb and extremely oppressive.
@@julius43461 the law that you're referring to is not that simple, really. It's not even a ban and those in favor if this law include non-Muslims as well. If you read into the law, people who can report the cases are those who are married and direct family members, which is extremely unlikely to be enforced. Although I disagree with the law, comparing it with a full-size Sharia state it's still a far way from whatever Saudi Arabia is doing haha. Personally speaking, search up regarding Islam so you can learn more regarding why what you most see as oppressive may actually be a misperception. All love brother.
@@PASTRAMIKick Yes, but when the foundation is rotten it is always going to be a ticking time bomb. The fact that 🦃 is where it is today tells you all you need to know.
And how long ago since it was a secular country. What happened to the none muslim politicans. What happens to the minorities. It is slowly going where every country like it goes. And maybe not today and maybe not tomorrow but eventually they will have a genocide just like all similar countries. Cause it is in the texts.
We are at the classic point where the tolerant tolerate the intolerant to the limits of tolerance itself, with increasingly diminishing returns for society and increased decadence
Facists hate democracies, so it's no suprise that they work so hard to undermine it at every turn. It's just sad that so many are indiffrent to it until it's to late.
This is Western system. Capitalist oligarchs at the top, their political stooges below them and rest of the rabble below them. And they are supposed to submit in that order to each other.
Honestly, one thing I don’t get about European liberals is why they support those ☪️ people who oppose liberal values and gay rights, while it's mostly conservatives who seem willing to push back against that.
You think it is fair to judge a country because it has not yet made the societal advances that other countries have? The USA is the good guy in ww2 and yet they had insane segregation back then and more elaborate structural racism. What is not can still be. And people are fighting for it. But treating them like outgroups only motivates them more to stick to traditional believes, even more than in the countries that they are originally from
It`s because they are short sighted and hungry for power. They see the Muslim vote as an easy way to victory. They don`t care that in the long run their values will die out.
This is what made me realize that people who masquerade as progressives today don't care one bit about what happens in the future. All they care about is appearing virtuous right now, consequences be damned. As an actual progressive, I am pretty much in favor of not surrendering the most advanced societies on Earth to religious zealots. If you actually want to preserve liberal values, and even make strides towards improvement, than you will not blindly support anything, and you will speak out against insanity even if it means your life becomes less comfortable as a result.
As a Middle Eastern progressive atheist currently living in the ME, I'm very disappointed in what Europe is doing and how it is dealing with Islam. People do not understand how easy it is for foreign countries (and sometimes a single influential religious scholar) to control the Muslim population. A single fatwa by an islamic jurist is enough to put thousands if not millions on the streets to get what they want (it happened in the UK and many other EU countries before), sometimes by force. Right now they might want equality and I don't deny that there are many respectful, kind, and sometimes fairly progressive Muslims who try to be moderate, but as the rate of Muslims entering Europe increases and more radicals enter Europe (Europe tends to accept the more radical Muslims since they live in war-torn/unstable areas, which is why many Muslims in Europe are sometimes more religious than the average Muslim in their home country) the general Muslim community might be encouraged or pressured to become more extreme. For example, I know Muslim women who don't wear/ don't want to wear the hijab themselves but still vehemently defend the Iranian regime and its crackdown on women's rights because they've been told that criticism of the regime benefits heretics and damages Islam. That's because it's very easy to pressure a devout Muslim into supporting a cause that "protects Islam" with considerable lack of opposition or doubt from the general Muslim community, even the moderates. So I personally find it shocking how many of the same people who can't stop complaining about the Catholic church not fully recognizing same-sex relationships/not supporting women's right to access abortion clinics, are the same ones who happily invite religious zealots who couldn't care less/openly encourage the execution or persecution of homosexuals and are still debating whether women have the right to not cover their hair or not, let alone have an abortion, into their country. Of course not every Muslim is like that but many are, and the number of conservative Muslims will only increase in the future. This crisis could break Europe and erase hundreds of years of progress in human rights and tolerance, so I hope Europeans and their leaders stop delaying this debate just because some say that it's "racist" or "islamophobic".
Christendom was always an empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts. Constantine chose regularly to refer to himself as the “servant of God” (famulus dei/therapon tou theou) in official writings. By the fifth century, this metaphor of subordination had been redeployed from theological to political contexts as the subjects of the emperor came to refer to themselves as “slaves of the emperor.” And by the sixth, Justinian insisted all his officials swear an oath that they would demonstrate their service to the emperor “with genuine slavehood” (gnesia douleia).b Building on Paul’s revalorization of the vocabulary of slavery, and particularly the word doulos came to be applied to a variety of hierarchical relationships, even as it also continued to be used specifically of chattel slaves. By the middle Byzantine period, this expansion of the semantic range of the root doul- eventually gave the abstract nominal form douleia, meaning laborer Insofar as everyone who partook in labor was considered to be a participant This epistemological world view is coherent with master-slave dynamic relationship between the head of the state and his subjects, or rather slaves. The word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses: “Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9 “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”-1 Samuel 15:3 “Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.”-Hosea 13:16 The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers: “in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.” Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as:: “seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.” Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed: "Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer". Evoking several of these verses in practice: - (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. - (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them... - (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary. This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished. This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah): "includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit."
This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship." It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children." بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة "To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause" -Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah: حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ» "Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries" حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ» سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ» "The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly" This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them. Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". both the renessiance and the european enlightenment were directly preceded by massive translation movements form Arabic (see the Republic of Letters by Alexander Bevilacqua, The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization By: Jonathan Lyons. The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@@boatmessi123 Doesn't work that way when Muslims themselves are at least equally as guilty of conquest of land, ethnic cleansing, genocide, racism, slavery and destruction of culture as well as erecting empires and are probably known even better than Europeans and Americans for initiating wars particularly with foreigners.
France fought many wars in the past to keep Islam out. Some examples: 732: Battle of Tours: With perhaps 1,500 soldiers, Charles Martel halts a Muslim force of around 40,000 to 60,000 cavalry under Abd al-Rahman ibn Abd Allah al-Ghafiqi from moving farther into Europe. Many regard this battle as being decisive in that it saved Europe from Muslim control. 759: Pippin III captured Narbonne, the last Muslim stronghold in France, and thereby drove Islam out of France. Now in 2024, France is willingly allowing itself to become Muslim. This is very sad.
Charles had as many soldiers as the Umayyads did, not 1500. Source: La bataille de Poitiers: Charles Martel et l'affirmation de la suprématie des Francs
That was not France but the Carolingian Empire vs Umma yad Caliphate. These two were two big political entities only using religion for their own purposes.
The survey results early in the video are frightening, to say the least. Europe needs to be very clear-eyed and decisive about the threat to the rule of law and to their Western culture that these sentiments pose. Yikes.
The surveys don't show or tell us the community would remain always religious as the next generation that will come will probably be less religious while at the same time holding to their religion or faith.
@@Inzersdorf93 history is a good statistical basis in itself as well. History shows that spain was enslaved for 600 years by caliphates. East Rome was destroyed by the ottomans. Europeans were second class citizens in bulgaria, spain, greece, egypt (which was back then heavily greek and roman). One of the main goals of islam is to proof it is the one abrahamic religion. Conquest usually was the tool historically. It is a huge failure of eu immigration that many people moving there do not consider themselves european at all.
@@e.d9993 Well there is only data as far as 3rd gen muslims, which was pointed out as the most radical one to date. We don't really have data on how other religions looked when they came here, but for a democratic union it is troubling that half of young muslim adults think Sharia should be over whatever country they are in
@@deounivers7663 Most of those who were asked about the Sharia question don't know it fully as what the questionnaire meant by that as most Islamic countries apply sharia only on family matters and sometimes in financial matters.
At least so far, seems really unlikely Islam’ll ever fit in with Europe. Especially with them becoming more radical and islamic as you say in the start
@@hydoffdhagaweyne1037 Do you live in Europe? Are you worried about the changing political climate? Do you adhere to sharia and do you place it above national law?
I appreciate this. I'm very much a left winger, and generally consider myself 'pro-migrant', but it infuriates me to no end that you have to go to the far right here in Britain before you get anyone talking seriously about the long term issues with migration. Not even our populist right Reform UK really get into it beyond rhetoric. I'm very keen to have a genuine discussion about the long term impacts of migration, but you really can't do so without being called a racist! From my position, the mass migration we're currently implementing is a form of an arms race among the West - like a "scramble for Africans" - to plunder as much of the young labour, skills, etc from the world's poorest countries. That inevitably leaves the poor world in a much weaker position as they don't have the workforce they need to develop (in the UK, we have more Ghanaian nurses than there are in Ghana). This means that instead of these countries developing like China to become middle income in a generation or two, they are trapped in desperate poverty for far, far longer than they need to be. Purely for the short term economic gain of already rich countries who can't be bothered to train up their own workers.
ye its sad but ppl forget history. ppl also forget that the other culture likely sucks when ppl flee in millions from the other country. Would be way less social pressure to just rebuild the nations with high population loss, instead of taking all young people from them. It is never mentioned how mass immigration kills the origin country until the demographics have regenerated.
Does the UK have more Ghanian nurse than Ghana because they are stealing all the Ghanian nurse or because they are able to make people nurses more easily.
In my experience, when muslims claim they're being discriminated what they actually mean is that they're not granted privileges and aren't allowed to perform religious stuff that goes against European laws and/or morality.
EU-Wide if the organisation/mosque/whatever is advocating for Sharia Law it should be banned. Seems to be an easy non-brainer and I'm baffled it isn't the case yet.
Nah that's right wing hate speech! Embrace Islam! Chose sharia law it is the progressive way forward! And Europe isn't racist or conservative, right??!!
Sharia is a vague term that covers things from avoiding eating pork and drinking alcohol to stoning for adultery. People need context as to what “advocacy for sharia” is
No respectable mosque or Imam would advocate for what you're thinking of (i.e. imposing islamic laws on a whole nation). This is very unislamic, the islamic/sharia ruling for living in a non-muslim nation is to integrate as much as possible without sacrificing your faith (don't drink alcohol, go to local religious temples, etc...) Imposing Islam on anyone is literally commanded against in the Quran (2:256), and is strictly prohibited. Unfortunately there are muslims who themselves don't even understand this.
Yeah, because Poland doesn't take in a lot of immigrants from Muslim countries. By far the biggest portion of the immigrants, that Poland takes in are Ukrainians, and they don't cause much trouble. That is why Poland is now much safer than all the countries that took in Muslims.
@@hamsatd not really, not anymore. Used to be so in 2000s, not so in 2020s. source: I live there, happily, and confident of a better future. And so are many other people. Some Polish people are actually coming back to the country after having emigrated in 2000s and 2010s.
Poland is built on loans from the western core so it can act as a buffer against Russia. Polande success is not Polands own work. The country is built on socialism and then today that structure is maintained by international banking.
@@hamsatd yeah, but those people integrate well in those societies.. here in Germany Poles are even assimilated... you can't tell apart a German from a Pole.. unlike many Muslims that still see the Native Germans as weak and inferior.. many Turks still identify as Turks, even if they are born here.. they still choose to name their children Ali or Fatma.
In The US, you have a non ethnic nationalism. Something that’s unites the people over a single idea. But in Europe because they’re afraid of ethnic ultranationalism, they gave up over nationalism completely! And they’re not united over any idea anymore.
Some parts did, some didn't and some have kept their more chill from the start stance. Extremes are the priviledge of the great and powerful, in whatever which way.
@@geertgietman indeed, with certain, mostly bigger or more influential countries, imperialism, colonialism and nationalism have formed a coherent system, mostly the backbone of the 19th and 20th centuries, but its vestiges can more clearly be felt in say Russia, which's colonial history is simply one by land, not by sea. Smaller countries have always focused more on self preservation and thus their nationalism is both less violent and more tolerant, perhaps also more progressive, but of course, especially at their "peaks" in a way, the outright problematic or at least ambitious stuff has revealed itself. The same type of imperialist nationalism once ruling much of Europe is still going strong around the world and even in Europe its revival can be seen in many places (the smaller nations without an imperial past have remained more progressive and balanced comparatively).
@@weamibrahim2146A person failed to obtain German citizenship because he wouldn’t shake the woman official’s hand. So clearly it would weed out at least some hardcores.
at what point did Europe for the Europeans become so "bigoted", you could literally say the same thing about africa, MENA, and so on, and in those cases it's totally fine, something went really wrong along the way and now the western societies are actively trying to destroy themselves...
It was colonialism, neoliberalism and the general attitude of the western bloc during the cold war. Europe brought this upon itself. It has no right to complain now. go and deal with it.
@@kavky so you're at the forefront of the mess and you're doing absolutely nothing to help the rest of us even though eco parties and Varoufakis' Diem are right there? Yeah...
@@nostur4984 Bro you forget who sent the firefighters to help you with those summer fires. We the individual countries have no say in what the eurocrats decide.
At least Eastern Europe is safe from this madness. Also, we need to accept that some cultures are simply not compatible with European ones and stop ignoring the obvious problems with it. The UK needs a massive anti-terrorism taskforce for things like Christmas and it is slowly starting to suppress and prosecute anyone critical of Islam, which is incredibly scary and worrying, especially as Muslims start occupying more and more positions in the government and get more influence. I have a really hard time imagining how the UK will be by 2050-60, let alone 2100. British white children are already a minority and the Islamic religion is being taught in public schools alongside many children being bullied for not being Muslim or girls for not wearing a hijab. Not only that but all of the progress that Europe made in terms of women's rights and LGBT are slowly but surely being eroded (not so much in terms of legislation but, rather, fear and violence).
As Indonesian it baffles me how majority of muslim in european country can be a fundamentalist. Heck, the statistic that said that younger generation become more fundamentalist is insane, at least compared to here.
@@RK-cj4oc I'm pretty sure that one phenomenon is because we were colonized by the dutch and have almost zero grudge to our colonizer. This is not unique to Netherlands, I'm pretty sure this happen to Japan too.
@@acatreassuresyouthateveryt7842 That is possible. Personally i believe it is because Indonesians just have a very welcoming and confident culture that does not rely on violence . So they integrated better and interact more with Dutch people. In Dutch school muslims boys and men often self segerate themselves into their own groups. Indonesians rarely take part in that.
I am 30 yo muslim grown up in europe and i have yet to encounter a single muslim that says sharia law should be above local law. This is of course an anecdote but it really makes me wonder where all these people are
@@furkan3945 Wouldn't you say that rules made up by a god who can supposedly punish you for eternity are more important than those made up by humans? "What's the worst thing humans can do, send you to god?" I think this is how respondents interpret this question. I imagine a higher percentage would respond in favor of local law when asked specifically about one of the gruesome laws and punishments of Sharia, relying on morality instead.
@@michelbruns admit what? I am here for an open conversation as an into europe fan. Ask me a question. Not even my relatives in turkey that live in one of the most religious provinces think sharia should be above the turkish law.
@@CjqNslXUcM indeed the way the question was posed can make a difference. No one that really believes in a religion would admit that religion is just a hobby and the government is above everything. But in daily life they still adhere and support the state they grow up in. Maybe a better way of asking a question would be whether someone is willing to break local laws (& go to prison or sth) because sharia says so. I believe almost everyone would say no then.
It's turning into a Muslim AND African expansion. Remember that it's not only migrants from the Middle East heading to Europe. Europeans must unite together as one to combat this madness that's destroying a great, historical, and beautiful continent.
The thing is even if everyone in the middleast moved here to eu, They would still be outnumbered 1 to 4. Its just seems alot cause of how many got in since 2014 and honestly these calculations that this guy did is from recent years when whole of brussles was red & green. With the 2024 results the right to asylum immigration policies that has existed will be revoked & its already happening. Article 18 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 06 January 2025. (from eu parlament's website)
The damage is done. Its easy to allow millions into your countries but extremely hard to get rid of them. Soon these people will have a voice, take part in policy making and it surely won’t be for the benefit of the European lifestyle. Europe has lost. I would invite the creators of this madness Ursula and Angela to take a stroll through one of the no-go zones in cities like Malmo, Frankfurt, Paris and London, no security just two well dressed ladies taking a walk in a culturally vibrant cities they have created.
As a Muslim who was born in the uk, I don’t get why many Muslims who are also born here turn radical or try to turn the west into an Islamic country. I love England and it’s my home and I’d never try to change it and I think you can be European as well as Muslim but some people are just problematic and extremist
I'm always afraid of Muslims in UK like Mohammad Hijab, Ali Dawah etc who openly propose the capital punishment for apostates. Bro can you tell what percent of Muslims in your neighborhood are extremists?
Centrists will never provide adequate solutions, which will inevitably lead to a hard right solution, whether we like it or not something has to be done
@@inteallsviktigt A solution to what? There was no real problem there, they were just the scape-goats for a bunch of problems Germany had and a bunch of hate followed.
I felt that while the author tried to stay neutral, there were several instances of cherrypicking, manipulation and cause substitution in his video. Whether it was intentional or just a cognitive bias, I don't know. But I feel it should be addressed, because the video feels one-sided in the end.
My condolences and empathy goes to Michael Stürzenberger, who barely survived a vicious and cold blooded knife attack in Mannheim Germany for merely criticizing the political Islam.
@@Megaspinosaurusrexdon’t you dare to spread such disgusting misinformation. Police officers risk their lives every day to ensure the safety of the general public. You don't know what their relatives are going through. In constant fear of receiving the terrible news that their son, brother or husband has been killed by an Islamist. Police officers deserve nothing but respect. Shame on you for your deviant comment. The perpetrators are ALWAYS pro-Palestinians
@@linakhan331 the difference is decreasing year by year, not to mention that, as many, many developing countries are majority christian instead, you could have mass immigration without any muslims. Not to mention the situations of Ukraine and Russia etc, whose disporas have spread across the rest of Europe for different reasons over the centuries, them also retaining christian beliefs, if any at all.
To think that Persia, now Iran, was one of the most developed and enlightened countries not even so long ago. And they were for centuries. In terms of science, laws, handsome people and tolerance. The stuff of legends, literally. If feel that no matter if you live in Jakarta, Rio or London, that is or should be interesting because it helps put things into perspective.
Interesting fact: according to online Teheran polls, only 40% of the Iranians are Muslim. But since it's (supposedly) dangerous to admit to apostasy or atheism, most still declare themselves Muslim.
Persia under the original 3 caliphates was still developed and enlightened what destroyed it was the constant and very brutal Turkish/mongol hordes the Seljuk then mongols and then timur who alone killed 80% of Persia population and others who killed many as well and also destroyed many of Persia important cultural cities though through it all Persia came back under the Islamic Safavid and for awhile we’re doing amazing they were developed and enlightened then the Safavid fell due to internal issues then they had a brief hope with the afsharids but someone killed the king and that was that for Iran for the next 2 centuries until just before the Islamic revolution where in their later years they actually had a good future ahead of them the shah was listening to the people and they were heading towards a western leaning tolerant rich and developed constitution monarchy but no one forgot the decades where the shah brutally oppressed them and the fact that everyone knew he wasn’t the legitimate leader extremely unfortunate but what are you gonna do
It is clear that Islam is the problem, not Europe as other religious immigrants (Hindus, Buddhists etc) do not cause any problems of this kind and are more than willing to accept that human rights and the constitution of the country is non negotiable. The fact the muslims disagree shows that they have no willingness to integrate. This coupled with European governments being too scared or politically correct to truly call out the issue as it is, is very concerning. The newer generations of immigrants being more radical should not come as a surprise to anyone. The first generation immigrants coming from muslim countries have seen firsthand the suffering and broken societies created by strong islamic values and are more willing to reject it. The further generations, growing up in Europe taking human rights for granted have not seen this and thus directly fall for the strong islamic propaganda without having the reality of an islamic society to balance it out. The new generation immigrants believing more strongly in Islam than the first generation is like leftist people living in capitalist societies calling for communism without having experienced the pains of living in a communist society. The muslims calling for an Islamic caliphate in Europe, why don't they take a trial of it in Afghanistan? It is a true caliphate. The perceived discrimination is overblown imo as they are the ones who are unwilling to engage in discussion or debate over the role of their religion, making it almost taboo to even have peaceful criticism. Such constructive criticism immediately gets viewed as Islamophobia. Also, aren't they being discriminatory against the beliefs of the other 80% of european residents by calling for things like Sharia law and establishment of islamic caliphates? It's going to be a great day for human rights and global society the day middle easter oil money stops flowing. Thank you for making this detailed and well researched video that many others lack the guts to make.
Younger generations becoming more radicalized is due to the Western Invasion into their lands. Wouldnt you become bitter and keep a huge burden inside your heart when you grew up in war and very likely lost a relative because of it? And all you had is hope that you get out of this miserable situation? People try to ignore the fact WHY they become radicalized than older generations, BUT i still agree that just because you basicly lived your whole life in nothing but misery, you shouldnt keep your burden inside your heart. Islam teaches that, but humans are still humans and still do mistakes.
Really great and nice video. You covered all the points i wanted. As a Dane, im really satisfied with the depths, specifically covering many central issues in Denmark. Remember also that the danish social democrats completely switched their opinion on immigration, and saw huge success. Or the Mohammad drawings causing a big scandal. i really appreciate the video man! keep it up
I didin't give my consent to the Brits and French to divide Kurdistan into 4 countries where they later would launch a coalition invasion and force my family to flee to Europe. But you dont see me crying like a little baby, instead i search for the truth
from 711, when Tariq crossed the strait of Gibraltar, until 1492, when the Catholic Kings conquered Granada, there were 782 years of continuous religious war between Christianity and Islam. There was time in those 8 centuries to find accommodation between the two societies, and none was found. It's in the history books.
How about you read of the historic example the Caliphate of Cordoba set, being one of the most religiously tolerant and culturally rich societies in Europe at the time. In Spain Muslims and Christians fought against each other just as much as they fought amongst themselves.
@@costantinochianale4904That's pretty much a lie. The Caliphate of Cordoba was as bad as the other states around them. Let's not forget that the Visigothic Kingdom was invaded by the Muslims and both the nobility and peasantry were persecuted by the new regime
@@Seraph2077 As they did to the romans in the area and as the romans did to the celts and native iberians. My point is that Cordoba was demonstrably more tolerant of its christian and jewish population. Need I remind you that both muslims and jews were fully expelled from Spain in 1492, to the point that Thessaloniki in greece had a majority of spanish speakers just from the jewish refugees that went to the Ottoman empire. I'm assuming you're spanish from your name and rhetoric, I really would encourage you to read up on your muslim history, it's a great point of national pride that you're missing out on just because they followed a different god.
@@costantinochianale4904 " being one of the most religiously tolerant and culturally rich societies in Europe at the time." Because the standards were extremely low. It was still apartheid.
I struggle to see it happening - the elites want Europeans to become a minority: and the populations would rather pretend it's not happening. The mathematics of demography mean time is very, *very* short to save the situation. Another 10 years of the same course and it will be too late.
Diaspora people often have identity crisis and turn to a hard core form of Islam and a Us vs them mentality. The natives of their home origin countries absolutely hate their diaspora because it feels as if they’re cosplaying as a nationality. Natives are way cooler
This!!! I second this. I wish more people realised this. European "Muslims" look down on us and see their homeland as nothing more than a holiday destination all the while they pretend they're more religious than us. Like, if you love your homeland so much why don't you come live here with us??? They're hypocrites
I’m an American watching this. Seeing religion seem above real-world laws makes me sick. If you move to a country, you respect their values. I hope to move to Switzerland, but I hope that these radical religious views don’t ruin the continent.
Real-world laws are shaped by society’s view of right and wrong, which is inherently subjective. In many Western countries, these views evolve over time. Preferring Sharia law over state law is not necessarily a radical stance; it’s actually a mainstream view among many Muslims. Why should it be an issue to hold a perspective on what is right and wrong? Ultimately, the people living in a society determine its values and laws.
How exactly do Christian’s do it? lol doesn’t make no sense at all. You follow the rules of your country and you follow the rules of your religion. Hypothetically As a Christian would you say that you follow the state law first and then the religious law. Yes? That’s only because the law doesn’t have any thing contradictory to religion. Which is the case for Islam too But let’s say state law would idk ban all non meat foods for the time of Easter fasting. Would you follow your religious law and try to find anything other than meat, even though illegal? Or would you just not fast? My point is that the Islamic „law“ is a set of morals a Muslim should follow. And there should be no real clash between state law and religious law. If there is a clash, then it is because state law wants to enforce something on Moral law.
Finally someone who isn't afraid to dive into this topic and actually discuss it in a non political way. Really well balanced and well presented video. You give all the data needed and arguments from both sides. The issue of Islam in Europe is huge and it is time to being able to have an open discussion about it without being labelled far right or racist for just mentioning it.
I have one slight correction: it’s more fitting to describe the „Muslim Countries“ as Muslim majority countries as there governments tend to be secular monarchies or dictatorships. 2. beeing „more relaxed“ than dictatorships and monarchies is not a bar to set for ourselves in Europe
Our roots are actually pagan, by the way. Becoming more Christian will result in similar hellholes as a lot of those Muslim countries. Europe is too smart to be religious, unfortunately too kind a tolerant towards people who don't reciprocate.
My thoughts The moment some one or group advocates for sharia law they are arrested or kicked out the country The moment they threaten anyone under religious pretences Arrested and or kicked out the country The moment ANY VIOLENCE happens in relation do to their religion Arrested or kicked out the country Also Criticism should not be silenced but allowed public spaces just like with any other ideology or religion.
as a muslim i agree with all points that have been stated, but i feel as though the "criticism" being given is just disrespect, but hey freedom of speech is the first amendment, so i can't really complain about that. it's like when people deny the holocaust. i mean sure, they can do it, but it's really disrespectful
@@adamelghalmi9771It turns into disrespect because the threat of violence from muslims often lead to disrespect. If muslims were more accepting of critisism the type of critisism would also be more normal.
@@adamelghalmi9771Also. Wtf. Critising the holocaust is in no way equal to disagreeing with islam. Wtf? The Holocaust is something that people lived through and we know happend. Islam is a religion.
@@adamelghalmi9771 anyone should be able to crticize any ideas. Islam included, no special treatment. It's weird that you think Islam should be immune to criticism
@@RK-cj4oc To be fair I don't think he was saying that they are the same in damage more so a really bad wording of "Its really bad that people say X but freedom of speech dictates that it should be allowed"
The whole video is so well documented but just misses the point. We are not dealing with Islam as an alive force or monster. Islam is a book, words and values. By wich PEOPLE live. We are dealing with PEOPLE. And it's pretty obvious that a manipulated and shaped by circumstances at that.
UK does seem to be only place to not have a political backlash against Islam (tho it did have a violent backlash this summer), note how Reform UK is the only major Far-Right party in Europe not to have an explicit anti-Islam platform
It would probably be illegal. British people also spend more hours on average consuming media & therefore have a smaller overton window of acceptable thought.
The problem is Islam is not simply a religion - it's a law and value system that is not compatible with laws and values of European countries. The fist basic rule of integration is respecting the traditions and laws of a country you are integrating with. Islam and it's many divides is the major reason why we even have so many refugees this days. As a European I think that governments HAVE to be secular - separation of church and state is one of our greatest achievements and I would like it to stay where it is.
The vast majority of "muslim states" were secular. However, they were also brutal and horrible. Thus, people see secularism as tyranny and islamism as freedom.
Just imagining where we are headed to makes me sick. It just feels so unfair and like Europeans haven’t had a say in this at all. I am beyond disgusted.
Do you think that recent events in Afghanistan will open the eyes of radicalized European Muslims, especially women and girls? Your channel is one of my favorites! 🇪🇺💙
Afghanistan doesn't follow the full Sharia law for example education in Islam women and men have the right to education in fact seeking religious and worldly knowledge is an act of worship + having any job that he's society for example being a doctor is an act of worship too. Many of the laws in Afghanistan are tribal laws that come from the Pashtunwalli code/way of life (it's like the Japanese bushido Samurai code) that was practiced before they accepted Islam. (Namoos), in Pashto, means - my woman, my gun, my home, my honor. It means, in essence, my everything. Women are seen as precious and they aren't meant to be seen shared with others. You can search and read about all the laws. If you don't follow these laws you are not a Pashtun or an Afghan. If you don't follow these you are not part of a tribe/family. You can learn about the Pashtunwalli code it is mostly good it has things like justice, love, honor, loyalty, hospitality, bravery, arbitration, selflessness, and protection (even if your enemy seeks your protection you must protect your life), respect, the only few that have some problem with Islam is pride, revenge (forgiveness is better than revenge), and Namoos (Islamic modesty is better than Namoos). They give the most respect to their mother she is like queen bee. Afghanistan follows Pashutnwalli more than Islam. Which makes it not a Sharia. Namoos also means the absolute defense of women. In their tribal world view they ar protecting women. The West wasn't smart when they tried to bring democracy to tribal people who loved their kings, their code of life, and their religion.
Well well well… they are leaving their “lovable, delightful, religious” countries to Europe and surely it’s not because they want “better” life. They just don’t understand that if Europe got annexed it would be very “lovable” like their countries. Save Europe…
*All that goes around comes around.* What did Europe and the west expect when they invaded those countries and created chaos and left millions of people homeless? And then on top of that, took in those millions as refugees for "cheap labor" with all their trauma and PTSDs. what cloud go wrong here... I guess we are responsible as well, more so than them.
muslim countries are not all that religious. that is a myth europeans made up at home. they're more or less the same as european countries in that regard save for 3 countries. but only 3. the emergence of radical islam (which is almost strictly a european phenomenon) is the result of Saudi interference like Into Europe himself pointed out at 20:05. Maybe stop buying Saudi oil????? or kick turkey out of nato????
Islam has nothing to add to European culture, Europe is a continent rich in art, science, architecture and cuisine, not to mention that it is the cradle of Christianity, secularism and various social movements.
@theblackgods4699 The Christianity we know is of European origin. It was European Christianity that was spread throughout the world and not this supposed Christianity from Africa that you say exists!
@@pedroarthurbarbosa I never said Christianity came from Africa I said it came from the middle East .which it did the texts that Europeans based their beliefs on came from the middle East. Wether you're a Catholic or protestant the core idea of Christianity is the belief in christ and his divine parentage which ultimately comes from the middle East. So essentially Europeans just spread the religion that was spread to them.
@@pedroarthurbarbosa also there is no Christianity of European origin there are denominations of European origin but Christianity itself can only have one origin which is judea (Israel/palestine)
As an American Muslim I think this video was about as impartial as could be reasonably expected. I do want to make one correction though. The Quran nowhere states Muslims are not allowed to have non-Muslim friends or acquaintances, the verse cited 5:51 is a prohibition on taking them as allies or guardians. The Quran actually states to deal with nonviolent non-Muslims kindly. “Allah does not forbid you from dealing kindly and fairly with those who have neither fought nor driven you out of your homes. Surely Allah loves those who are fair.” Quran 60:8
The Quran is one thing, but actual moderate and extreme Muslims teach each other and their kids not to have non-Muslim friends and lovers. See channel "Candid With Lubna" for examples, as well as other YT channels created by ex-Muslims who do interviews, interviewers and the interviewees both confirm the this notion. As I stated elsewhere under this video, for each non-violence Quran verse you can find two violence-inducing ones, and vice versa. And there are multiple interpretations of Quran, even though Muslims insist there's just one, reality shows otherwise. Relating to Quran verses as if they were an indication of the reality surrounding us is a void argument. Mind you I'm not saying this to offend you - it just is this way. Noone cares if Quran says such thing in one verse or another (especially that you can find contradicting verses - I'm not going to go into it, there's plenty of channels on YT doing that) when real-world Muslims are behaving differently.
@ I mean respectfully I try not care too much about things outside of my control. There are obviously people around the world of every persuasion who teach their kids to be racist, discriminatory, or hateful and I don’t think anyone needs to watch an interview to know that’s manifest. I don’t really know what kind of hyperbole you’re using to describe Quran verses because of course there are way more non-violent verses in book 114 chapters long that covers a plethora of topics. And just like anything, people can absorb information in different ways and apply their own interpretations. In Islam we have something called tafsir though which use to develop our understanding. Now as far as contradictions go, no one seriously attributes to the Quran a contradictory nature, that is scholarly or academic, as opposed to whatever little RUclips videos you may have watched. I would honestly discourage watching other people before actually reading the book yourself, if nothing else to not look ignorant moving forward. I say this genuinely not to say it’s purposeful or that’s your character. I know I have ignorance about certain things and try to not engage people until I have good surface level understandings. But yea not taking non-Muslim friends is just an inaccurate translation so feel free to friend us up.
@@Frodo1000000 The percentage of "violent" verses in the Quran is lower than other mainstream religious books. Most muslims don't have a problem with having friendly interactions. Mariage is another question, it doesn't mean hostility. If no one cares about the Quran's message, and the Quran is open to various interpretation. Then why do people who are against muslims use it as argument in the first place? Why bring up the Quran?
@@Frodo1000000I asked chatgpt and it says there's about 70 out of 6,236 verse that talk about violence, conflict, and warfare, but with context and historical events, so do you have any evidence that for each non-violence Quran verse you can find two violence-including onse?
@@pixel_dank Plenty of ex-muslim channels like Apostate Prophet already doing that. Sorry, I don't care enough to spend extra time on that. It's a figure of speech, too.
If there is something that I genuinely despise about capitalism, is that for money corporations are willing to do anything, with no regard to society at all, the fact that they refused sponsorship for this particular video is further proof of that.
Western countries have largely abdicated their roles in integrating minorities, thinking it would be chauvinistic. This overly permissive environment is to blame for a lack of integration.
I believe that the Singaporean approach handles best, we cannot deny that (as a sum of its proponents) Islam is becoming an established community in Europe, and we cannot spend the rest of our shared existence going to war over what we should do with them; instead we need to amplify voices who are willing to coexist peacefully, not the black/white debate on total acceptance or total rejection, the gradual exhaustion from both sides will eventually lead to everyone realising that peace is the mutually beneficial option.
Tbh I really am glad that the US doesn’t really have this problem remotely as bad as Europe does. I studied Islam as a teenager and I know that moderate Islam really is a thing, but fear over unrestricted Muslim migration is 100% justified.
Their ways are simply not compatible with ours, not saying I hate all of them, but there comes a time when they either stand by our values, our culture, respect our past, and respect our people, or be kicked out, because from what I'm seeing happen in my home nation of Sweden is that most of them that believe in Sharia law just want to cause trouble, but who am I to talk when caring about your people is being a "Nazi Fascist"
I don't want to sound like a crazy right wing ook but look at Posen and Nederlands as an example.Posen maintained a hardline stance against migration well before the current administration everyone was welcome in Nederlands.Europe become soft and liberal which is why it was so easy for muslim culture to infltrate.Europe abounded her relgion and culture and now she is being punished for it
@prsimoibn2710 Stop being silly a continent can evolve besides several elements of paganism such a certain traditions have been integrated into christianity.You need to understand that the values that helped Europe succeed so much are drawn upon from Christianity.Values such as benevolence and justice.
@prsimoibn2710 Judging from your other comments everything seems linear to you and your quite snarky and sarcastic.Life is not a straight line it's more of road that changes and divides into different paths
I think Swedish or Denmark's approach is good. Because of Muslims believe I don't think they can integrate in European society unless Europe promotes European style Islam far Less violent more tolerant and with humanistic values but it feels like that's just a eutopia.
I think we should at the very least not allow foreign countries to finance European Islam. Arriving at a liberal view of Islam really is key. Fundamentalist Islam is incompatible with our liberal democracy, just as fundamentalist Christian sects are.
You don't understand the teachings of islam.Islam is noncompatible with anything except islam not even with christianity.Start learning about islam then you will understand it is cult not a religion.
@@Victorvondoom9159 "As a Muslim myself, why don't you just implement anti-immigration policies aimed at limiting the amount of immigrants rather than mumbling about it online!?" - JanHQ
@JanHQ the problem with some people ain't one religion but all religions . Faith and beliefs are dangerous if they go a dangerous path. With me it's the individual that must take accountability for their actions
I have much respect to how you’ve tackled this subject. Based on data, and avoiding bias in both directions. Europe certainly must prevent radical movements and undue influence.
There is no islamophobie but there will be if the things will stay as it is. The amount of chaos crreated in the name of islam grow early, and in the last year it has skyrocketed
We in Romania have a small (under 1%), native population of muslim Turks and Tatars that are very well adapted. We are also seeing a growth in Arab muslims. But all the mosques have imams that are under the recognised Mufti . Being part of a recognized religious organization and not just anyone that preaches whatever he wants makes for better imams, less spreading of hate and intolerance. Why can anyone preach anything in mosques in Western Europe? Christian priests are also called to order by their superiors if their teachings get extremist. But in the name of religious liberties, Western Europe is allowing for a lot of intolerance.
There’s a lot to unpack and debunk here: Salafism spread in Europe from 1980 to 2000, during the Sahwa period, when Saudi Arabia poured around $100 billion into spreading Salafist ideas globally. The money went into building Salafist mosques, publishing books, and funding various Salafist conferences. Salafist groups found their strongest following among young Muslims in poorer areas, where people often felt disconnected from both their parents' Sunni religiosity and society. They pushed for young muslims to separate themselves from wider society and even justified political violence in religion's name. What's particularly concerning is how they've used legitimate concerns about anti-Muslim discrimination as a recruitment tool. Instead of helping, they've often made things worse by encouraging isolation. Internet forums and social media have made it much easier for them to reach young people. The Salafist ideology contributed nothing to the Muslim communities. The main reason to explain what people call "parallel societies" is the economic factor which you barely mentioned, because most Muslims in Europe come from working-class backgrounds and often live in poorer areas. These families often stay in these poor areas because they have limited chances to move up economically, coupled with high unemployment rates makes economic segregation worse. The cost of housing can keep people concentrated in certain areas too. It’s important to note that these patterns have happened with other immigrant groups and are not only unique to Muslims. Many Muslims are well-integrated and live in mixed neighbourhoods. Highlighting issues related to immigration and integration is often a powerful populist tool used by Right wing politicians in elections. The fact that European Muslims spend money on halal products and businesses doesn't mean they are against integration, which is ridiculous to say. These Halal friendly businesses pay their VAT and corporation tax to the government which means they’re integrated. Halal products and businesses were setup to cater to the religious and cultural needs of the Muslim community. Just like the Chinese have Chinatown, Italians have Little Italy, and Jews have Kosher friendly businesses. Halal friendly businesses often serve a wide range of customers, and the demand for such products isn’t limited to Muslims. European anti-radicalization laws, such as banning the hijab or shutting down Muslim charities, are just Islamophobic laws that does not help reduce radicalization at all. Often seen as collective punishment aimed at Muslim communities because of actions caused by Salafists who are a minority. Some security experts have even pointed out that these measures could actually back up claims made by Salafist groups that all European states and societies are deeply anti-Islam, even though this isn’t true. This approach may end up causing more division instead of creating long term solutions. The Henry Jackson Society that you cited, is a right wing and Islamophobic think tank. It was founded by Alan Mendoza and few others. Mendoza also sits on the board of the Jewish National Fund (JNF). The JNF isn't just any organization - it's actually the biggest group building settlements in Palestine and has played a key role in preventing Palestinian refugees from returning to their homes, despite UN Resolution 194 saying they have that right. Looking at who signed the society's founding documents tells us more about its connections. One notable name is Irwin Stelzer, who was basically Rupert Murdoch's close associate. This explains why Murdoch's newspapers, like The Sun and The Times, often publish articles by Henry Jackson Society members - articles that often show clear anti-Muslim bias. The Hertog Foundation funds the Henry Jackson Society, but they're also big supporters of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. The same foundation puts money into Friends of the IDF and the Middle East Forum. Florence Bergeaud-Blackler is a known Islamophobe and a charlatan who is presented as a serious academic researcher when her work is just cheap polemics and exaggeration of the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence. She received criticism from many researchers concerning the quality of her work. Muslim Brotherhood doesn’t call to Islamize the world that’s a clear cut lie. It primary focus is on promoting Islamic values and interests within Muslim communities. In the UK, for example, “Muslim Brotherhood dominated” Muslim Association of Britain (MAB), rejects violence and participates in activism and local elections. They actually support social integration and encourage young people to be active and responsible citizens. “We see the results of this in European streets where there have been Islamist protests in countries like the Netherlands or Germany, calling for the establishment an Islamic caliphates across Europe.” It’s worth noting that these protests are organized by members of Hizbu Tahrir, an international Salafist group that advocates for establishing a caliphate in the Muslim world. It’s a fringe organization among the Muslim communities globally. "Sharia Patrols" were made up of a small group of unemployed Salafists connected to the banned organization Al-Muhajiroun. The so-called Sharia Patrols were harassing mainly Muslims in East London. The East London Mosque also publicly condemned the patrols and Metropolitan police arrested many of its members, The group was effectively shut down and no longer existed after 2014. The Southport murderer was born in Wales, UK, and suffered from mental illness. He came from a Christian family originally from Rwanda. There is no evidence to suggest that he was Muslim or that he carried out the attacks in the name of Islam. The UK government has authorized two additional charges against him. “Even if we leave aside the calls to ‘submit or kill the non-believers’ - which have been taken to heart by radicals and terrorists, the Koran is hardly a call for integration.” - This is clearly a misleading statement. Salafist terrorist groups like AQ and ISIL mostly justify their terrorism by citing Western military interventions in MENA region. If you read their materials which I bet you didn’t, they base their violence on political reasons not religious reasons, and they often refer to the works of figures like Mohammed Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, Sayyid Qutb, and the Khawarij sect, known for its extreme beliefs. Even when these groups quote the Qur’an, they do so out of context to fit their agenda. Major Muslim leaders, scholars, and numerous Islamic councils around the world have strongly condemned Salafi jihadism, calling it a deviant and unacceptable interpretation of Islam. To say that the Qur’an hardly calls for integration is simply not true. The Qur’an encourages Muslims to engage positively with others and highlights values that support peaceful coexistence and mutual respect. Here are some examples: Chapters 60:8, 49:13, 5:8, and 2:256. You mentioned Singapore as an example of successful Muslim coexistence, but I’m surprised you didn’t mention American Muslims. They are one of the most well-integrated Muslim communities in the West. Many American Muslims are part of the middle class and actively participate in society and the democratic process.
1-No comment, I don’t talk that extensively about Salafism in this video. 2- Parallel societies are a feature of Islam, when Denmark tried to tackle them through its social engineering policies to tackle crime, low employment… It got called racist for breaking up communities. You do not get to have it both ways, saying that parallel societies are the consequence of poverty and complain when they get broken up to improve outcomes for living there. 3-The Halal economy, is a parallel economy by definition - it is about creating a class of products and services that is made mostly by and for muslims. Goes far beyond food products we, there is Islamic finance, there is ‘Modest fashion’. These elements differentiate muslims from non-muslims - and that is the goal. (See ‘Le Marche Halal’ by Florence Bergeaud Backler) 4- Muslim majority countries are banning hijabs, and shutting down muslim organisations as well. - I talk about the consequences of this in the 4th part of this video. 5- Yes, I am aware of their leanings, but is their poll methodologically sound? I would say yes, and their results are in line with other polls from credible institutions. The day were the UK censes agencies make similar polls, I will share them - until then, all I had access to was this imperfect data. 6- I read their criticism to make my own opinion, and they do the same thing as calling her ‘Islamophobic’ which is not a rebuttal of any of her arguments or body of work. Epistemological, these critics provide little to no value to the public debate. 7- "Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur'an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope." This is the motto of the Muslim Brotherhood. If this is not a call for an Islamic society While (currently) non-violent, it is as multiple security studies have shown a destabilizing force and increases the rift between Muslims and non-Muslims. 8- Protests that are good illustration if not entirely a reflection of the political opinions of Muslims in Europe as seen by the 3 surveys I shared. 9-The evidence against him - that he has an Al-Qaeda manual on his laptop, and the highly suggestive fact that every single court sketch of him has him hiding his face (and potential facial hair features?) 10- Again, the Quran is ambiguous and ambivalent (as I mention in the video), you can take any call for integration and match it up with a call for tolerance (I am not going to get into the debate on whether these are Mecca or Medina Sourats, and the context in which they were written). - You can decide that you want to engage with only the positive ones, fine, but that is not a reflection of reality. The fact is these calls for secession and difference are the ones being shared by mosques (many Salafi Imams in Europe) and TikTok imams. And reflected in the behaviour of Muslims in selecting friends as demonstrated by the academic studies mentioned in this video. 11- Muslims in the US represent less than 1% of the population - in a more religious society, which previously had a highly selective immigration procedure under which its Muslims came. And the country is about to implement a second muslim immigration ban under the new Trump presidency. I doubt such a policy approach would be contested by Europe’s far right leaders Hopefully, this clarifies a few things. 😊 And thank you for allowing me to flex my keyboard! Cheers, Hugo
You’re welcome, Keyboard warrior! Just kidding, “Parallel societies are a feature of Islam”. This is simply not true. Islam does not explicitly advocate for separation, there’s no evidence of that. Again, similar socio-economic patterns of community clustering can be seen in various ethnic and religious immigrant groups around the world. Denmark’s anti-ghetto policies faced criticism from organizations like the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights and Amnesty International for potential discrimination and the exclusion of community voices during the process. No one criticised them for tackling poverty and crime. This social policy has never been done before in Denmark and we need to wait for the future to see its full results. “The Halal economy, is a parallel economy by definition“. Again this is false. The Halal economy operates within existing European economic structures and markets. It creates jobs and generates tax revenue for the local government. It doesn't create a separate, parallel system because Halal products and services are already being integrated into mainstream markets, alongside non-Halal offerings like in Belgium and the UK. Florence Bergeaud-Blackler`s book, Le Marché Halal, has been met with criticism for exaggerating the implications and framing the halal market as divisive lol, which is not supported by any evidence. “these critics provide little to no value to the public debate”. Well, I’m not sure about that. The Islamophobia Industry: How the Right Manufactures Fear of Muslims (2012) by Nathan Lean critiques Bergeaud-Blackler's work. The Oxford Handbook of European Islam (2014) by Jocelyne Cesari who criticised Bergeaud-Blackler's simplistic approach. Even Lorenzo Vidino who’s known for his UAE funding and for writing extensively against the MB presence in Europe, questioned Bergeaud-Blackler's methodology. “This is the motto of the Muslim Brotherhood. If this is not a call for an Islamic society”. Again, based on that motto where does it call for the Islamization of Europe and the world? None. That motto was used during the early days of the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1930s during the British colonial rule of Egypt and its aftermath, context is important here. Since the 1980s, their motto was changed and their activities was also changed towards social and educational activities. “Muslim majority countries are banning hijabs, and shutting down Muslim organisations as well”. No, they are not lol. There are 49 Muslim-majority countries, only 2 countries banned wearing hijabs in public and 5 countries banned wearing Burqa in public citing security reasons which is understandable. MB-affiliated organizations are the only organizations that are being shut down mainly in the Gulf countries, because they view them as a threat to their authoritarian regimes. “The day were the UK censes agencies make similar polls, I will share them”. I completely agree. “Highly suggestive fact that every single court sketch of him has him hiding his face (and potential facial hair features?)” Even if he had facial features that is still not evidence that he is a Muslim and carried the attacks in the name of Islam. The investigation is still ongoing, we will have to wait and see. “but that is not a reflection of reality”. Well, that claim definitely has no basis in reality. As I said, Salafist terrorist groups justify their attacks based on political grounds backed by modern jihadist literature. I advise you to read the works by Charles R. Lister, Hassan Hassan and Michael Weiss. “calls for secession and difference are the ones being shared by mosques (many Salafi Imams in Europe) and TikTok imams.” Nobody is disputing with you on that, Salafists are known to be an exclusionary group like I said before.
@ I have to say, I'm extremely impressed with how you have demonstrated your argument in a precise, thoughtful and professional manner. With regards to what you have stated, I would have to say that I agree with every point you have made and there is no denying that this video is portraying a certain narrative that is coming across as one-sided unfortunately. Overall, I would like to say, both of your responses are some of the best comments I have ever stumbled across concerning this debate. Thank you for your unbiased approach and accuracy, I very much appreciate it.
For peacfull coexistence of europeans and islam, the faith would need to secularize to some extend which, as we saw in the video, is not happening - quite the opposite in fact. And the if we're really honest: everyone knows how this is going to end. Question is only if the europeans will accept their fate peacefully
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
If you would like to support deep dives on challenging topics like this one, support Into Europe on Patreon: www.patreon.com/IntoEurope
I'm downloading your videos with interesting headlines now, before your channel is erased. "Being objective" is what Western censorship hates the most!
Thanks for your work for as long as it lasted!
22:41 40% of Brussels population is Muslim? 😂 I generally agree with your take but you’re making yourself look so scientific and pragmatic with these takes when in fact it’s clear what you’re trying to push.
As I stated in my other comment, only 5% of the Belgian population is Muslim and it is estimated that 40% of those Muslims live in Brussels. That’s a huge difference from what you state in the video and now I’m unsure if I can trust the rest.
@@bestdrip3377 Are you surprised?
@@bestdrip3377 yup, I make mistakes, made a comment about it! Thanks for pointing it out :)
The gaza war has lead to great escalation of all the problems and divides you have shown here and not measured fully yet. And it has some radical effects one may not have anticipated. It has made a rather large numbers of muslims show their radicalism or radicalized them in the first place - especially antisemitism. This now in germany lead to the center and even parts of the left to develop actual enfringement, fear and rejection of islam in europe as nothing is as unappetizing as antisemitism to germans (literally).
It is really weird as a left winger when in UK left wing politicians are actively supporting people who are against left wing.
The UK is just a mess in general
Muslims as a group have always been one of the largest voter blocks that vote for labour and other left wing parties ever since they arrived in the UK, every attempt of right wing social and economic policy has been done by the conservatives a party which muslims dont really vote for i dont know where you got your muslims are anti left from
Being lefthist is supporting ideologies/people that oppose you/your group
I know a bisexual person who hates muslims because of muslims opinions of gay people. He makes sense here, but many other lgbt+ people supporting or being neutral to islam is weird.
@@ptasznik5973 no
Europe doesn’t have blasphemy laws for Christianity so why should we have it for Islam?!?!
But Europe does jail people over antisemitism. Some Muslims find it unfair that u can get jailed over saying something anti semitic, but saying something anti Muslim won't.
@ I agree that it’s difficult to say anything deemed to be anti-Jewish. There shouldn’t be a problem to criticise any group of people.
@@hellothere1656 Do you have an example of this?
@@GeorgiaMartin-ll9qg You can criticize any person. However, it makes a difference if you criticize a person because of their ethnic origin!
@@pinktfatrabbit israeli media reported that a Dutch guy got arrested by the Netherlands for wearing an anti Semitic shirt, yet israelis in the Netherlands shouting racist slurs towards Arabs or those burning the Quran and shouting hate towards Muslims were never arrested.
Europe is cooked. Why muslims in muslim countries are much more western than in western countries😭
Because the ones who want their countries to stop being backward theocratic hellholes, stay and fight, the ones losing that battle, go to our countries.
FRRR I don't get it
If talking about the guestworkers, it was because it wasn't those that could "afford to westernize" -so to say- that needed to move for work. The migrants came in larger partd from more conservative rural regions, rather then from the wealthier and more progresive urban regions.
But it's a country by country basis. Some muslim countries became more progressive while the disporia didn't, and oyher countried visa versa. I think, overall and in general, there's a bit of selection bias in thinking that arab countries are less fundamentalist than muslims from here on europe. Not saying that it doesn't happen tho
Ha! 😂😆 Muslim progressive??! Hahaha! 🤣
In my opinion, it’s partly because Muslims in “Muslim countries” tend to perceive themselves as fairly well off financially and don’t have to double down on a “Muslim” identity to fit into society. Western Muslims try to compensate for perceived failure to live up to religious ideals due to “modernity” and “secularism.”
Its a strange feeling watching civilizations and cultures commit suicide
Douglas Murray: the strange death of Europe
It was always going to happen. It is Allah’s will. A land of sin will turn into a land of worship so everyone gets into heaven inshallah
May be it's their past karma making them do this. EU imperialists after wiping out entire cultures and civilisations around the world is reaching the same fate. 🙄🙄😤😤
Well it’s simple, Europe’s economies and corporations after world war 2 did not want to accept the economical disadvantage they were given and the future prospects not looking so as sunny as before, so they decided on migration and cheap labor to stabilize the economy by providing expandable minorities. No one thought long term, also ignorance and arrogance of what Islam is has brought such a predicament for future generations. Now almost every important economy and domestic politics in Europe is dependent on the migrant populace. So I would say good luck 👍🏼 and if you want to point fingers, point them to the generations that came before
@ your comment is going to get deleted just like mine did for not blindly praising Islam as the religion of peace
oh no, europe is turning into lebanon 2.0
That's mean nothing
Turned* lol, you guys are f'd 😂
@@Hadasengel lebanon is 50% christian lol.
If I learned anything from my Balkan ancestors, it's never to late to Deus Vult.
@@IndigenousEuropean-hp4yl shoutout to our Iberian brothers as well
The biggest trojan horse in Europe
why i never think of that 😂😂😂
i just walk thru Ikea today , seeing horse symbol everywhere
Good
stop destroying Muslim countries 😁
The bbn pfp
100%
europeans need to learn what happened to the christians of Lebanon, Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Egypt
Arent the coptics a protected group in egypt?
What happened to them? Please enlighten us
I'm from Egypt. Christians here live in peace so far, although many Muslims don't like Christians, but they haven't been prosecuted in any way except maybe during the Islamist government in 2012, but it wasn't systematic.
Nevertheless, you are right about the Christians in Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq.
I don't really know much about Turkey, but I don't think they are oppressed there
@@u.mat88 syria and iraq are unstable countries which are even unsafe for muslims themselves and in lebanon they have a say in government
@@u.mat88I think they are talking about Armenians who once were living in Turkey and got expelled like 125 years ago something idk.
I think a lot of the problems come from an ignorant view that all religions are the same.
Many western politicians treat Islam like its effectively Christianity, whilst the two religions are very distinct in their principles, practises, and beliefs.
this omg the number of ignorant people i've heard spout the idea that in the end all religions are the same is unreal. peak western naivity. and we know where naivity usually leads people
"There will come a day that we will see far more radical extremists and terrorists coming out of Europe because of lack of decision making, trying to be politically correct or assuming that they know the Middle East, and they know Islam, and they know the others far better than we do, and I'm sorry, but that's pure ignorance"
~ UAE's 2017 prime minister, Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed
@@mznxbcv12345yeah lets Just ignore the conquest of north africa, Middle east and Central asia and the arab slä vë trade🤦
That argument would not be fruitful. Reason being how bloodless they were, indeed it is the reason why the region still has so many creeds, unlike any other place in the world until the modern era. Indeed it's the reason why people make a big deal out of the jizya forgetting that for the last several centuries the romans (and persians, both aggressive expansionist imperialists) extracted a far greater tax poll. The Muslims/Arabs were spread out far too thin to weather a local rebellion had it been as oppressive as apologists claim. Unlike the mongols who ruled a large spat of territory by eradicating the local populace while themselves being few in number, The Muslims were so few in numbers, especially compared to the urban settled populations conquered; That it was by just administration that they ruled the territories. The tribute under the commander who took Egypt, Amr ibn Alas for example was 12,000,000 dinars, Khaukianos, the last Byzantine prefect of Egypt levied 20,000,000 gold dinars.
To compare, in order to take Gaul Caesar eradicated an estimate of half the population, inaddition during Roman rule of Egypt, Egypt was not regarded as part of the roman territory but as an asset and personal property of the emperor himself, thereby providing for nearly 2 thirds of the roman treasury, on the other hand during Muslim Rule not only had the soldiers not been allowed to enter liberated cities, they were not allowed to buy land or settle either. In Egypt for example, the caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab restored the Coptic pope Benjamin I (622-661) to his seat after he had been in exile for 13 years under the Byzantine emperor Heraclius.
With regards to the conduct of the commander who took Egypt, Amr ibn Alas with the Coptic pope we have this accounts written by Severus of Ashmunein a coptic priest and historian:
"Then Amr turned to him, and said to him: "Resume the government of all your churches and of your people, and administer their affairs. And if you will pray for me, that I may go to the West and to Pentapolis, and take possession of them, as I have of Egypt, and return to you in safety and speedily, I will do for you all that you shall ask of me." Then the holy Benjamin prayed for Amr, and pronounced an eloquent discourse, which made Amr and those present with him marvel, and which contained words of exhortation and much profit for those that heard him; and he revealed certain matters to Amr, and departed from his presence honored and revered. And all that the blessed father said to the commander Amr, he found true, and not a letter of it was unfulfilled." -History of the Patriarchs of Alexandria
Amr, upon the request of the Caliph Umar, asked the Patriarch Benjamin what was the best way of keeping the country in order and raising the revenue. The conditions laid down by the Patriarch were these:
(1) that the taxes should be collected at the right time (the end of the agricultural season)
(2) that no taxes should be demanded after the vintage;
(3) that the canals should be dug out yearly;
(4) that the dykes and sluice-gates should be kept in repair;
(5) that no unjust or tyrannical official should be appointed.
The Chronicle of John, Bishop of Nikiu writes about Amr "And he exacted the taxes which had been determined upon, but he took none of the property of the Churches, and he committed no act of spoliation or plunder, and he preserved them throughout all his days.", He writes in a later section regarding the city of Alexandria and that its previous unjust governor Menas had the pol tax of the city to be 32,057 gold dinars while Amr deposed him for a person loved by the people that had been exiled by Heraclius named John and had it set at 22,000. Regarding the appointment he writes "Now he had been appointed prefect of the city of Alexandria when Amr entered it. And this John had compassion on the poor, and gave generously to them out of his possessions. And seeing their affliction he had mercy upon them, and wept over their lot. Amr deposed Menas and appointed John in his stead."
Ibn `Abd al Hakam (187 - 257 A.H/ 800-871 C.E ) writes that when `Amr was firmly established, he made the Copts pay a similar tribute to that exacted by the Romans, but it was to fluctuate in proportion to their wealth and prosperity. This can only mean that he continued the Roman system of land-tax: for the poll-tax imposed by the Arabs was a fixed payment, while undoubtedly the land-tax varied in accordance with the rise of the Nile and the general conditions of agriculture. Ibn `Abd al Hakam goes on to say that it was the duty of the village headmen to meet and examine into the state of agriculture, and to distribute the burden of taxation accordingly. They were in fact a sort of local commissioners for the assessment of the land-tax. Any surplus above the prescribed amount was to be expended on local improvements, and a portion of land in every township was set aside to provide a fund for the maintenance of public buildings, such as churches and baths. Any hospitality which the Muslims claimed of right from the Copts was to be taken into account (see History of the Caliphs by Al-Suyuti)
While the Roman system of registration and of collection was partially continued, the taxation fixed under treaty by the Arabs was both less vexatious and less burdensome than that of the Romans. The treaty constituting under the first article a general security was given for the life, property, and churches of the Egyptians, who were also to be allowed the free exercise of their religion. For the payment of tribute and taxes constituted them a protected people ('ahl adh dhimmah',literally 'the people to whom one is bound to by honor of an agreement') with a status implying these privileges. The tribute was fixed at two dinârs per head for all except very old men and children, and the total tax was found to amount to 12m dinârs" Contrast that with the Al-Muqawqis, the last Byzantine prefect of Egypt who levied 20m dinars.
That the early government of `Amr was animated by a spirit of justice and even sympathy for the subject population, can hardly be questioned. But this was not an isolated case, Wardan when ordered by the later Caliph Mu'awiah to increase the tribute levied on the Copts, he answered that it was impossible owing to the terms of the treaty.
Al-Mawardi ( 364 - 450 H /974-1058 CE), a jurist says, `There is a dispute among jurists as to the amount of the jiziah. According to Abu Hanifah ( 80 - 150 H / 697-767CE) there are three different amounts: (1) from the rich are due forty-eight dirhems; (2) from the middle-class twenty-four; (3) from the poor twelve. These sums he gives as the maximum and the minimum, and he forbids governors to exercise their own discretion as to the amount.' It is impossible to read him without being struck by admiration for the extraordinary sense of justice and fairness which animates the theory and system of taxation he is describing:
"
Even when a protected people breaks its treaty by refusing payment of tribute, it is not lawful to kill them, or to rob them, or to take their children,
so long as they abstain from violence such rebels, however, must be given a safe-conduct and quit the territory of Islam; and if they refuse to depart voluntarily, they must be ejected by force.
'"
There are texts from the 800's CE debating whether, if one for example were to take a log of wood that was not theirs, make a column out of it and have it as a foundation of a house, later the original owner of the column comes back and demands the log to be retrieved into his custody and refuse monetary compensation ought the judge comply, tear down the structure and give him the log or ought he enforce a monetary compensation. this was 1200 years. Property rights were taken that seriously, you could not simply handwave it and enforce a monetary compensation as that property in question was not attained by proper channels, hence it' s ownership and how much ought be the compensation for it is judicated by its owner and no one else has the right to, not the governor or even the caliph. Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia".
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@mznxbcv12345 did He also Order you to "unalive" 600 Milion Indians?
Europe is halfway into digging its own grave with the way topics like these being swept under the rug due to fear of being 'politically correct', lecturing the rest of the world against 'islamophobia' while being silently consumed by the same. My heart is with the women and children of Europe for the soft targets would be the ones affected most in the coming years.
Okay but did you know the Quran your Holy book tells you to go to the Enjils and Tawrat the first 5 books of the Hebrew Bible Torah and the New testament Gospels Written by Jesus eye witnesses Matthew , Mark , Luke and John. Jesus claimed to be God as well as accepting worship. The Messiah who the Quran says Jesus is it makes more sense the Messiah would be God only God can forgive sins , heal , cast out demons , raise the dead ect. The first 5 books of the Torah Genesis , Exodus , Leviticus , Numbers and Deuteronomy written by the prophet Moses.
John 1:14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son[a] from the Father, full of grace and truth.
John 8:58
Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.”
John 10:30
I and the Father are one.”
John 20:28
Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God!”
Matthew 1:23
23 “Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son,
and they shall call his name Immanuel”
(which means, God with us).
Matthew 18:20
For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them.”
Matthew 28:18
18 And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
Matthew 28:9
And behold, Jesus met them and said, “Greetings!” And they came up and took hold of his feet and worshiped him.
Matthew 2:11
And going into the house, they saw the child with Mary his mother, and they fell down and worshiped him. Then, opening their treasures, they offered him gifts, gold and frankincense and myrrh.
John 14:10
10 Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own authority, but the Father who dwells in me does his works.
Mark 2:5-7
[5]When Jesus saw their faith, He said to the paralytic, “Son, your sins are forgiven you.”
[6]And some of the scribes were sitting there and reasoning in their hearts,
[7]“Why does this Man speak blasphemies like this? Who can forgive sins but God alone?”
Luke 5 : 20
Seeing their faith, Jesus said, “Friend, your sins are forgiven.”
John 8 : 12
When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.”
John 10 : 11
"I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.
John 10 : 7
Therefore Jesus said again, "Very truly I tell you, I am the gate for the sheep.
John 14:6
[6]Jesus told him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me.
John 15:1 "I am the true vine, and my Father is the vine grower".
John 9:38
38 He said, “Lord, I believe,” and he worshiped him.
John 6:35
"I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me shall not hunger, and whoever believes in me shall never thirst"
John 1:3
3 All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.
Exodus 3:14
14 God said to Moses, “I am who I am.”[a] And he said, “Say this to the people of Israel: ‘I am has sent me to you.’”
Matthew 28:19
19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in[a] the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
John 10:28-30
28 I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. 29 My Father, who has given them to me,[a] is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father's hand. 30 I and the Father are one.”
Genesis 1:27
27 So God created man in his own image,
in the image of God he created him;
male and female he created them.
Genesis 1:26-27
26 Then God said, “Let us make man[a] in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”
Genesis 9:6
6 “Whoever sheds the blood of man,
by man shall his blood be shed,
for God made man in his own image.
Genesis 5:1
5 This is the book of the generations of Adam. When God created man, he made him in the likeness of God.
Leviticus 17:11
11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it for you on the altar to make atonement for your souls, for it is the blood that makes atonement by the life.
Exodus 30:10
10 Aaron shall make atonement on its horns once a year. With the blood of the sin offering of atonement he shall make atonement for it once in the year throughout your generations. It is most holy to the Lord.”
Luke 23:33
33 And when they came to the place that is called The Skull, there they crucified him, and the criminals, one on his right and one on his left.
Mark 15:25
25 And it was the third hour[a] when they crucified him.
John 11:25
25 Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life.[a] Whoever believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live,
Luke 24:6-7
6 He is not here, but has risen. Remember how he told you, while he was still in Galilee, 7 that the Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men and be crucified and on the third day rise.”
Matthew 28:5-6
5 But the angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you seek Jesus who was crucified. 6 He is not here, for he has risen, as he said. Come, see the place where he[a] lay.
Deuteronomy 32:39-41
“See now that I myself am he! There is no god besides me. I put to death and I bring to life, I have wounded and I will heal, and no one can deliver out of my hand. I lift my hand to heaven and solemnly swear: As surely as I live forever, when I sharpen my flashing sword and my hand grasps it in judgment, I will take vengeance on my adversaries and repay those who hate me.
Numbers 24:17
I shall see him, but not now: I shall behold him, but not nigh: there shall come a Star out of Jacob, and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel, and shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Sheth
Matthew 13:24-30
24 He put another parable before them, saying, “The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a man who sowed good seed in his field, 25 but while his men were sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds[a] among the wheat and went away. 26 So when the plants came up and bore grain, then the weeds appeared also. 27 And the servants[b] of the master of the house came and said to him, ‘Master, did you not sow good seed in your field? How then does it have weeds?’ 28 He said to them, ‘An enemy has done this.’ So the servants said to him, ‘Then do you want us to go and gather them?’ 29 But he said, ‘No, lest in gathering the weeds you root up the wheat along with them. 30 Let both grow together until the harvest, and at harvest time I will tell the reapers, “Gather the weeds first and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my barn.”’”
Luke 7:11-17
11 Soon afterward[a] he went to a town called Nain, and his disciples and a great crowd went with him. 12 As he drew near to the gate of the town, behold, a man who had died was being carried out, the only son of his mother, and she was a widow, and a considerable crowd from the town was with her. 13 And when the Lord saw her, he had compassion on her and said to her, “Do not weep.” 14 Then he came up and touched the bier, and the bearers stood still. And he said, “Young man, I say to you, arise.” 15 And the dead man sat up and began to speak, and Jesus[b] gave him to his mother. 16 Fear seized them all, and they glorified God, saying, “A great prophet has arisen among us!” and “God has visited his people!” 17 And this report about him spread through the whole of Judea and all the surrounding country.
UK is getting left behind. We keep hearing how welcoming we are to immigrants compared to other European countries. Perhaps we are better mannered and do not insult Muslims to their face but we whisper to one another. Muslims think we are soft and a pushover. No wonder thousands are on Frances shore waiting for an opportunity to cross the channel. Poland only has 0.25% Muslims and a new law in place that allows border guards to shoot any migrant attempting to cross border.
Just personal experience as a tourist travelling from New Zealand.
When I first arrived in the UK I started scrolling through instagram reels and started to get UK content coming up. One of the first reels to come up was an Iranian teenager who would go around annoying police, but many of his reels were of him filming and basically harassing trans or gay people in public. Most of the comments were written in Arabic and were supporting what he was doing.
I'm sorry, these people are not Muslims. This is wrong. Sorry that you had to experience this.
@@haveagoodday2025 nope they are and they're ruining my continent
No, this is muslim and this is Islam too@@haveagoodday2025
Persian 😂 not Arabic
@@prsimoibn2710 yeah it could be Persian from countries that have extremist religious thought
Famous words of UAE's Highness Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan in 2017 ::
"There will come a day that we will see far more radical extremists and terrorists coming out of Europe because of lack of decision-making, trying to be politically correct or assuming that they know the Middle East, they know Islam and they know the others far better than we do. And I am sorry but that's pure ignorance."
It seems he was correct about European politicians.
i wish he had actually justified his assumption. with ANYTHING. but he didnt. kinda lazy.
And as if his convictions are the reality. Remember He is an actual monarch who wants to stay a monarch, of course he is going to have that position.
I don’t know what being a monarch has to do with his statement about extremists?
@@TheSam661being a monarch in a Muslim country he should probably say the opposite to stay in power, not saying he s necessarily right but saying that doesn't really help him.
It sounds like he was chiding European Muslims, and how meekly they are treated to me.
Poland won't be Islamic state, so not entirety of Europe
Ha. Cute. You think Islamic Germany will not invade Poland?
@Kuramoto2719 i bet the IDF will back them up
@@Kuramoto2719 this comment made my day, white sharia FTW!
Makes sense since Christendom was always the empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts. Constantine chose regularly to refer to himself as the “attendant of God” (famulus dei/therapon tou theou) in official writings. By the fifth century, this metaphor of subordination had been redeployed from theological to political contexts as the subjects of the emperor came to refer to themselves as “slaves of the emperor.” And by the sixth, Justinian insisted all his officials swear an oath that they would demonstrate their service to the emperor “with genuine slavehood” (gnesia douleia).b Building on Paul’s revalorization of the vocabulary of slavery, and particularly the word doulos came to be applied to a variety of hierarchical relationships, even as it also continued to be used specifically of chattel slaves. By the middle Byzantine period, this expansion of the semantic range of the root doul- eventually gave the abstract nominal form douleia, meaning laborer
Insofar as everyone who partook in labor was considered to be a participant This epistemological world view is coherent with master-slave dynamic relationship between the head of the state and his subjects, or rather slaves.
The word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses:
“Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9
“Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”-1 Samuel 15:3
“Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.”-Hosea 13:16
The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers:
“in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.”
Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as::
“seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.”
Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed:
"Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer".
Evoking several of these verses in practice:
- (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
- (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them...
- (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary.
This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished.
This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah):
"includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit."
This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship."
It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children."
بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة
"To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause"
-Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya
More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah:
حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ»
"Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries"
حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ»
سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ»
"The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly"
This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them.
Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". both the renessiance and the european enlightenment were directly preceded by massive translation movements form Arabic (see the Republic of Letters by Alexander Bevilacqua, The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization By: Jonathan Lyons.
The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context.
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@@ikk_ikk again taqiya. its well know that christianity were persecuted by romans for almost 300 years. constantine never enforced christianity to his subjects, he only acknowledge christianity as one of the Empire`s religion thus ending the persecutions. it is Theodosius who make christianity the state religion but even him not enforcing christianity to his subjects.
ur religion on the other hand spread by war, by conquering middle east and sahara and using all means to enforce ur religion to populance so much so that most people in this region forget who they really are and now think they are Arabs
I love how Muslims being a majority in the near-ish future in Europe is treated as a crazy conspiracy by what feels like half the channels on yt, while the other half just calmly treats it as a statistical fact
i doubt they'll be a majority any time soon, but even france's 10% is already a big power
if Europe makes it easier for latinos to migrate that wont happen, they have high birthrates plus are way more eager to integrate. Same for people form the filipines, thailand, vietnam...
@@franbalcalso you want Latinos to cross days after days and Sattle? Sounds crap
Okay but did you know the Quran your Holy book tells you to go to the Enjils and Tawrat the first 5 books of the Hebrew Bible Torah and the New testament Gospels Written by Jesus eye witnesses Matthew , Mark , Luke and John. Jesus claimed to be God as well as accepting worship. The Messiah who the Quran says Jesus is it makes more sense the Messiah would be God only God can forgive sins , heal , cast out demons , raise the dead ect. The first 5 books of the Torah Genesis , Exodus , Leviticus , Numbers and Deuteronomy written by the prophet Moses.
John 1:14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son[a] from the Father, full of grace and truth.
John 8:58
Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.”
John 10:30
I and the Father are one.”
John 20:28
Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God!”
Matthew 1:23
23 “Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son,
and they shall call his name Immanuel”
(which means, God with us).
Matthew 18:20
For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them.”
Matthew 28:18
18 And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
Matthew 28:9
And behold, Jesus met them and said, “Greetings!” And they came up and took hold of his feet and worshiped him.
Matthew 2:11
And going into the house, they saw the child with Mary his mother, and they fell down and worshiped him. Then, opening their treasures, they offered him gifts, gold and frankincense and myrrh.
John 14:10
10 Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own authority, but the Father who dwells in me does his works.
Mark 2:5-7
[5]When Jesus saw their faith, He said to the paralytic, “Son, your sins are forgiven you.”
[6]And some of the scribes were sitting there and reasoning in their hearts,
[7]“Why does this Man speak blasphemies like this? Who can forgive sins but God alone?”
Luke 5 : 20
Seeing their faith, Jesus said, “Friend, your sins are forgiven.”
John 8 : 12
When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.”
John 10 : 11
"I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.
John 10 : 7
Therefore Jesus said again, "Very truly I tell you, I am the gate for the sheep.
John 14:6
[6]Jesus told him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me.
John 15:1 "I am the true vine, and my Father is the vine grower".
John 9:38
38 He said, “Lord, I believe,” and he worshiped him.
John 6:35
"I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me shall not hunger, and whoever believes in me shall never thirst"
John 1:3
3 All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.
Exodus 3:14
14 God said to Moses, “I am who I am.”[a] And he said, “Say this to the people of Israel: ‘I am has sent me to you.’”
Matthew 28:19
19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in[a] the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
John 10:28-30
28 I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. 29 My Father, who has given them to me,[a] is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father's hand. 30 I and the Father are one.”
Genesis 1:27
27 So God created man in his own image,
in the image of God he created him;
male and female he created them.
Genesis 1:26-27
26 Then God said, “Let us make man[a] in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”
Genesis 9:6
6 “Whoever sheds the blood of man,
by man shall his blood be shed,
for God made man in his own image.
Genesis 5:1
5 This is the book of the generations of Adam. When God created man, he made him in the likeness of God.
Leviticus 17:11
11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it for you on the altar to make atonement for your souls, for it is the blood that makes atonement by the life.
Exodus 30:10
10 Aaron shall make atonement on its horns once a year. With the blood of the sin offering of atonement he shall make atonement for it once in the year throughout your generations. It is most holy to the Lord.”
Luke 23:33
33 And when they came to the place that is called The Skull, there they crucified him, and the criminals, one on his right and one on his left.
Mark 15:25
25 And it was the third hour[a] when they crucified him.
John 11:25
25 Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life.[a] Whoever believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live,
Luke 24:6-7
6 He is not here, but has risen. Remember how he told you, while he was still in Galilee, 7 that the Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men and be crucified and on the third day rise.”
Matthew 28:5-6
5 But the angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you seek Jesus who was crucified. 6 He is not here, for he has risen, as he said. Come, see the place where he[a] lay.
Deuteronomy 32:39-41
“See now that I myself am he! There is no god besides me. I put to death and I bring to life, I have wounded and I will heal, and no one can deliver out of my hand. I lift my hand to heaven and solemnly swear: As surely as I live forever, when I sharpen my flashing sword and my hand grasps it in judgment, I will take vengeance on my adversaries and repay those who hate me.
Numbers 24:17
I shall see him, but not now: I shall behold him, but not nigh: there shall come a Star out of Jacob, and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel, and shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Sheth
Matthew 13:24-30
24 He put another parable before them, saying, “The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a man who sowed good seed in his field, 25 but while his men were sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds[a] among the wheat and went away. 26 So when the plants came up and bore grain, then the weeds appeared also. 27 And the servants[b] of the master of the house came and said to him, ‘Master, did you not sow good seed in your field? How then does it have weeds?’ 28 He said to them, ‘An enemy has done this.’ So the servants said to him, ‘Then do you want us to go and gather them?’ 29 But he said, ‘No, lest in gathering the weeds you root up the wheat along with them. 30 Let both grow together until the harvest, and at harvest time I will tell the reapers, “Gather the weeds first and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my barn.”’”
Luke 7:11-17
11 Soon afterward[a] he went to a town called Nain, and his disciples and a great crowd went with him. 12 As he drew near to the gate of the town, behold, a man who had died was being carried out, the only son of his mother, and she was a widow, and a considerable crowd from the town was with her. 13 And when the Lord saw her, he had compassion on her and said to her, “Do not weep.” 14 Then he came up and touched the bier, and the bearers stood still. And he said, “Young man, I say to you, arise.” 15 And the dead man sat up and began to speak, and Jesus[b] gave him to his mother. 16 Fear seized them all, and they glorified God, saying, “A great prophet has arisen among us!” and “God has visited his people!” 17 And this report about him spread through the whole of Judea and all the surrounding country.
There is no alternative to Islam that works . People now don't know what is a woman.
Else, the trend won't change.
As a Muslim in the Middle East, I was very shocked when I went to Europe and saw the way that many Muslims and those from my region are living and behaving there. It was such a shock and a disappointment because it felt like they brought with them the worst possible aspects of our societies and religion and very few, if any, of the good behaviors. Moreover, most of them think that they’re doing Europe a favor by going there because Europe doesn’t have enough workers (even though the ones I know were Uber drivers)! And funnily enough, like you mentioned radicalism and extremism are heavily in the Middle East, yet it felt virtually nonexistent in the West…
Leave the Ottoman legacy behind.
@@IndigenousEuropean-hp4ylWhat does this comment have to do with the Ottomans?
Your opinions would be well recieved among many Europeans.
Christendom was always the empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts. Constantine chose regularly to refer to himself as the “attendant of God” (famulus dei/therapon tou theou) in official writings. By the fifth century, this metaphor of subordination had been redeployed from theological to political contexts as the subjects of the emperor came to refer to themselves as “slaves of the emperor.” And by the sixth, Justinian insisted all his officials swear an oath that they would demonstrate their service to the emperor “with genuine slavehood” (gnesia douleia).b Building on Paul’s revalorization of the vocabulary of slavery, and particularly the word doulos came to be applied to a variety of hierarchical relationships, even as it also continued to be used specifically of chattel slaves. By the middle Byzantine period, this expansion of the semantic range of the root doul- eventually gave the abstract nominal form douleia, meaning laborer
Insofar as everyone who partook in labor was considered to be a participant This epistemological world view is coherent with master-slave dynamic relationship between the head of the state and his subjects, or rather slaves.
The word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses:
“Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9
“Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”-1 Samuel 15:3
“Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.”-Hosea 13:16
The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers:
“in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.”
Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as::
“seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.”
Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed:
"Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer".
Evoking several of these verses in practice:
- (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
- (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them...
- (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary.
This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished.
This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah):
"includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit."
This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship."
It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children."
بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة
"To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause"
-Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya
More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah:
حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ»
"Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries"
حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ»
سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ»
"The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly"
This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them.
Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". both the renessiance and the european enlightenment were directly preceded by massive translation movements form Arabic (see the Republic of Letters by Alexander Bevilacqua, The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization By: Jonathan Lyons.
The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context.
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@ikk_ikk "There was a man in Dayr Abu Salamah who was from the Basrah region, and he was impudent and reckless. It was mentioned that he had a Siwak (toothstick) and was without virtue. He said, 'By Allah, I only use the Siwak in my exit area,' meaning his anus. So he took the Siwak and put it in his exit area and then pulled it out. He carried on like this for the ensuing nine months. He then gave birth to a child resembling a rat with four legs. It had a head like the head of a fish, and it had a rear end like the rear end of a rabbit. When he gave birth, this creature screamed three times. So the man's daughter got up and crushed its head, and it died. This man lived for two days after giving birth to it, and he died on the third. He said, 'This creature has killed me and slashed my bowels.' A group of people in that region witnessed this, as did orators from that place. Some of them saw that creature alive before it died, and some of them saw it after its death."
Ibn Kathir, Al-Bidayah wa'l-Nihayah 17/470-471
How Islam changed the German landscape:
- road blocks in front of christmas fairs (finally i am safe!)
- knife ban zones (finally i am safe!)
- more barber shops (finally i can have the same hairstyle as the 25 customers before me)
maybe you havent interacted with Muslims in Germany yet, on a personal level?
Islam hat mich positiv verändert.
It is very difficult to navigate this subject while staying neutral. I think the majority of people are not racist and wish for muslims in Europe to be happy and successful but also feel there is a real problem with Islam in Europe and they don't know how to put these two things together. Thank you for not being a coward and having the courage to make this video. It shows reacl character on your part.
I appreciate Europeans who oppose and criticise us, but aren't hateful or discriminatory towards us. Media is radicalising people, which further makes any compromise harder and integration as well.
The issue is compromise with religious values aren’t something we should do
@@NiloNova no
@@NiloNova Integration or Expulsion. No more options.
@@alfrredd but also need to deal with those who refuse to.
Passing blasphemy laws would be the end of enlightened European societies.
Lots of European countries still have them. You can go to jail for up to 2 years in Poland.
Europe has always had blasphemy laws. There are things that are illegal to say in every European country
And that's a good thing.
I agree, although I don’t know what you mean by „enlightened“ sounds like rhetoric only someone with lack of self reflection would use.
Denmark reintroduced it after Muslim riots in their country.
Europe is obviously already desecularazing. It's not big as of yet and I wouldn't say there gonna be some huge turn on it but Europe is obviously less secular nowadays than 20 years ago and this trend will definitely continue to avoid civil turmoils.
7:00 This is the primary problem. They want their laws to replace ours. That is simply not acceptable.
i think the solution is to make and support moderate islamic institution that get along with the government. Government could push the organisation to abide by the state rule. also, thing get kinda complicated when the muslim want to solve their problem based on islamic rule, namely divorcing, inheritance and so on, in indonesia we have separate judicial system, civil one and the religious law. Islamic court could giving recommendation on the civil court to get thing in islamic pov get
done, in that manner, muslim are not complaining against the state or even think to overthrow the country to establish the caliphs.
On the constrast, european right wing government are against the muslim people and not accomodating their need, european nationalism is based on ethnic, cultural, and religious values of european people that doesnt accomodating another. European country should consider to lay its foundation on diversity, unity on diversity. u cannot force a believe to another people, nor another could do it to u, and i think its became main problem in europe.
Then ban the religion. This is what Islam fundamentally preaches, and the vast majority of scholars would agree. Secularism doesn't work with Islam because it has at its core political aspects, unlike for example Christianity. Moderates Muslims simply choose to ignore that fact but that doesn't change it. Secularism and the idea of freedom of religion make sense in a country dominated by irreligion or an apolitical religion, not with a political one.
It’s just a misrepresentation of what most Muslims think
@@RyanDerby-cf4pd How liberal is that? Why is this hypocricy? Where is your freedom of speech now? Or does that only apply to whites?
@@ahmadsulthanaqila4669 there is a strong wish in some circles for the alternative: kick the others out. The european populist right's ideas are similar, at times copycat from across the pond. Not only will they not cooperate, they'll employ force, and most european governments are absolutely capable to do that at least partially.
The question is of course risen, as all the immigration in the West has taken place under largely the same states and laws in force today. The same states themselves opened the borders, not some outside force.
Deportation. You cannot mix cultures that are so fundamentally different, period. Some may assimilate, but that would be a very small percentage.
This.
@@ginismoja2459 a temporary fix to a issue that doesnt exist, have you ever thought of what was the root cause of radical islam? the persecution of muslims.. you're actively seeking out issues and complaining when issues arise
Yes.
dont bomb muslim countries and leave them since your allies seem to want to 'free' us from terrorism in our own countries then we can go back. You started the problem, then complained about the problem that you started then blame us for your problem. Im shocked about how little you people know about Islam, especially because you think islam=kill non-believers and non-believers
this is an essentialist and racist viewpoint
you don't get to define what 'culture' is
Some small corrections:
22:41 - I say that 40% of Brussels population is muslim, that number is actually 20% (40% is the share of Belgian Muslims living in Brussels)
real number is likely 60%
Oh yeah I was like no way
In 2016 it was 23% so today it is probably 30%
@@juan-ko5hz Dude stop trolling, as someone who regularly visits the city, I would say it's around 25-30% in total for Brussels.
@@dontlaughtoomuch11 It's 80% of the people you see on the street because the rest of the population is working :)
Cool thumbnail there. It says “Into Europe man is a funny dude” in Arabic.
Edit: in all seriousness, it says something to the effect of “this is an Arabic text to make for a cool thumbnail.” But you people fell for my pro-Into Europe propaganda.
Hehehe this made me chuckle
Decent video bro, but I'm sorry you (channel owner) are falling right into the "zero sum game" playing field. We all know your narrative ends with the result of putting down one side and uplifting the other side and that could result in world war 3.
Many western country in the world are profiting by mass producing weapon and much of those were sold in the proxy country that has conflicts in the middle of muslim region,
and when the refugees of the conflicted muslim region immigrate to western country, they made an anti immigration policy.
Now I have a suggestion of solution, let's made a policy to ban any export of weapon to any country that has any conflict / potential conflict / recent history of conflict with muslim country, what is your opinion?
great video
AI Summary:
6:32 French Statistic 2023
62% muslim agreed french law are above sharia law
43% muslim age 15-24 agreed french law are above sharia law
6:42 89% muslim condemn the assasination of Dominique Bernard eventough he did the blasphemy against Islam (Google it)
6:49 92% muslim in school condemn the assasination of Dominique Bernard eventough he did the blasphemy against Islam (Google it)
31% muslim in school do not condemn the assasination of Dominique Bernard eventough he did the blasphemy against Islam (Google it)
This statistic doesn't make sense
7:14 Germany statistic 2022
33% Muslim agreed that law is above Quran
65% Muslim do not agree the violence for blasphemy
82% Muslim do not agree that violence justified if it advance Islam
63.5% Muslim do not want sharia law
54% Muslim do not want theocratic Government
7:31 UK statistic
British Muslim all Gender age education and nativity do not desire in ending Cristianity's traditional role by removing the church of England as the established church of the nation
7:44 Hamburg
Around 1,000 people joined Saturday's rally, which was organized by associations including "Kulterbrücke" (Cultural Bridge) and "Säkularer Islam" (Secular Islam).
The Saturday's pro-democracy rally was peaceful.
Dutch leader of anti-Muslim organisation Pegida sets Koran on fire May 2024. Wagensveld wore a shirt that read "Islam is no better than Nazism".
8:07 UK Terrorism statistic
From 1970 to 1979, From 1981 to 1983, From 1989 to 1994, From 1997 to 2003, From 2006 to 2011 and 2013 there is almost no cases of Islam inspired/Jihadist terrorism.
There is rise in terrorism exactly one year after falsely claimed 2003 West country vs Iraq war.
8:11 Europol Terrorist arrest
Rise in terrorism prior to US Iran tension and sanction 2 years before
8:38 Comparing Muslim Youth in Belgium, England, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden
None of the muslim youth say that national identity is not important
9:41 - 10:50 1 minute 9 second of west reject Islam argument
10:51 - 18:55 8 minute 4 second of Islam reject west argument
19:05 Speaker in the video hope Islam to be another Christian, because Islam is not modern, not secular, not humanist, and not enlightened
19:45 Speaker do not want Muslim to have any strategy or future outside of Islamic world
19:50 Speaker do not want Muslim to safeguard any identity, spirituality, morality, and distinguishibility
20:01 Speaker said Islam in Europe has been watered with copious amount of petrodollar and has taken roots
20:05 Speaker do not want Saudi Arabia to spend any money to promote Islam to the world; financing school, mosque, and cultural center.
Speaker said this would put Russia to shame
20:25 Speaker do not want European Union to have any ties with Turkiye and do not want any report about Islamophobia
20:36 Speaker told the existence of dangerous Islamic Brotherhood then jump to a French book Le Frérisme et ses réseaux by Florence Bergeaud-Blackler that there is brotherhood/brotherism in Muslim so he conclude that all Muslim in Europe is Islamic Brotherhood
22:07 Speaker do not want any mosque in Europe
22:12 Foreign Minister and ÖVP leader Sebastian Kurz presented the research "Rolle der Moschee im Integrationsprozess" report that there should be no general suspicion against Muslims or mosques. "But we must not look away when there are religious communities that do not comply with the Islamic law."
22:26 Speaker do not want any Sharia or anything Islamic at all to be taught in mosque which is Islamic house of prayer
22:39 Speaker said Brussels Muslim is 40% of population (no accountable source of information on this)
22:57 Speaker do not want any minority media or Islam content on tiktok
23:00 Speaker do not want anything halal
23:03 Speaker shows Tiktok content, expressing speaker's love of anything haram
23:10 - 27:42 European government policy
27:49 Speaker wants significant reaction like In India such as reviving certain religion superiority, destroying mosque, ethnic backlash/tension, destroying community
28:00 Speaker wants a step further in destroying mosque, severe mass detention, and prohibition on the right to be born
28:27 Singapore coexistence policy
30:40 Speaker said Muslim is against women right
31:04 Speaker said Muslim focus on minority right and foreign policy and compromising the rest
35:23 intellectual justification to avoid critics
It says "this is only an Arabic text so that it would appear great in the thumbnail" \ هذا مجردنص عربي ليبدوا رائعاً في الصورة المصغرة
Christendom was always an empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts. Constantine chose regularly to refer to himself as the “servant of God” (famulus dei/therapon tou theou) in official writings. By the fifth century, this metaphor of subordination had been redeployed from theological to political contexts as the subjects of the emperor came to refer to themselves as “slaves of the emperor.” And by the sixth, Justinian insisted all his officials swear an oath that they would demonstrate their service to the emperor “with genuine slavehood” (gnesia douleia).b Building on Paul’s revalorization of the vocabulary of slavery, and particularly the word doulos came to be applied to a variety of hierarchical relationships, even as it also continued to be used specifically of chattel slaves. By the middle Byzantine period, this expansion of the semantic range of the root doul- eventually gave the abstract nominal form douleia, meaning laborer
Insofar as everyone who partook in labor was considered to be a participant This epistemological world view is coherent with master-slave dynamic relationship between the head of the state and his subjects, or rather slaves.
The word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses:
“Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9
“Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”-1 Samuel 15:3
“Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.”-Hosea 13:16
The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers:
“in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.”
Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as::
“seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.”
Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed:
"Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer".
Evoking several of these verses in practice:
- (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
- (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them...
- (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary.
This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished.
This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah):
"includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit."
This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship."
It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children."
بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة
"To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause"
-Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya
More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah:
حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ»
"Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries"
حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ»
سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ»
"The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly"
This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them.
Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". both the renessiance and the european enlightenment were directly preceded by massive translation movements form Arabic (see the Republic of Letters by Alexander Bevilacqua, The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization By: Jonathan Lyons.
The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context.
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@@ranro7371Bro is commenting a academic paper 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂.
Muslims in the comment section are trying hard to explain what Islam is, what Muslims are actually like, how the video is wrong about Muslims, and so on. Do they really think Europeans care about all that?
For Europeans, their only concern is their own safety and preserving their way of life. It’s about collective self-defense. When preparing for self-defense, you don’t focus too much on the background of a potential threat, only enough to ensure your safety.
What muslims want to be, think they are is very different from what they actually are. We are in a collective societal cognitive dissonance when it comes to this one specific religion.
Why do Europeans support israel then if they care about their safety?
@@naslialtorik1411 Because Israeli lobbyists are strong in Europe, but it's changing now.
@@mbahremuk They are the reason migrants come to Europe. Why have migrants only started immigrating now compared to in the 1950s?
Where is self defense when you got people like Strauss Kahn in every single corner of your governments and institutions, have grown desensitized?
If a country has Sharia law, I'm not going.
You don"t have to go, it'll come to you.
@@xenoph9380Keep it away
well congrats, your only destination is probably the moon or some deserted island, Sharia laws are 90% personal life day to day average joe muslim, practising good hygiene? sharia law, you see someone praying or making Dua? sharia law is in play, you planted a tree, fed the needy, or donated charity?? congrats, that's also sharia law, you were good to your parents, family, neighbours? that's multiple sharia laws at play...
and even the DPRK has muslims, so.... now what??
there are probably aspects of sharia law in your judicial law. try one day without writing ignorant comments online
Ppl scared of sharia law are criminsl minded. Everyone who is scared od any law is a criminal. Thats it.
Belgian here, moved to sweden recently.
Started going to SFI ( swedish for immigrants, free Swedish lessons) people from all over the world in my class, including a guy from syria. He seemed nice, always willing to chat, saying hello, etc..
He moved away to Gothenburg last week and now girls ( the non- muslim ones) have come out, apparently he has been sending them videos of islam preachers( like the ones in the video), quotes from koran etc..
Gives me a eerie feeling knowing people like are freely walking the streets here.
i feel like there's nothing really wrong with that, unless they told him that they would like him to stop/were not interested in the religion, i know it comes out of good intentions from the guy your mentioning, as it's taught in islam to try and help everyone convert to the religion for them to go to heaven
None wanted this, none gave any hint they wanted it. They were so frightened they only dared to mentioned it after he was gone..
Also why bother with heaven after death ? Why not make it here, now..
Forcing your religion on others does not seem like it comes from “good intentions”.
It looks very arrogant.. like “i know what is best for you, more than you know yourself”
@@adamelghalmi9771No. Dont move to a foreign country if you cannot let the natives enjoy their beliefs in peace
one thing, you colonised our lands, plundered them, backed terrorism, and made our lives unbearable, and now you call us radical and the colonisers when we're escaping this oppression?
@@techwithibWho is we?
As a Muslim living in Muslim-majority Indonesia, it's very much funny how Islam in Europe is filled to the brim with many radical salafists that advocate for Sharia as criminal law. Indonesia is not perfect, but moderate Islam here has succeeded significantly in comparison to those within the EU as we have major organizations promoting this through debate and dialogue against these radical aspects (NU, Muhammadiyah). the Salafist doctrine of a conservative approach of Al-Wala' wal-Bara' (loyalty and disavowal) has been one the key factors that make them segregate themselves from any country in which their doctrine is not native, including Indonesia.
Singapore's approach into regulating Islam is what I believe fits most towards the EU, diversity of moderatism in the form of centralization by hiring Islamic experts that is in touch with the broader community, promoting moderatism while at the same time beneficial for both the Muslims and the overall society.
I also think it's funny that Islamists group up with left-wing parties within Europe solely because of the Palestinian issue, even though the vast majority agree with right-leaning policies. This issue really is about human rights, and within Indonesia whether it is left, right or center, whether Muslim or not, we advocate for a square deal. Then again, I personally don't have a stake here, and I really wish the best for my European friends.
Didn't Indonesia ban extramarital sex recently? Some countries may be a bit less radical, but they are all a ticking time bomb and extremely oppressive.
@@julius43461 the law that you're referring to is not that simple, really. It's not even a ban and those in favor if this law include non-Muslims as well. If you read into the law, people who can report the cases are those who are married and direct family members, which is extremely unlikely to be enforced. Although I disagree with the law, comparing it with a full-size Sharia state it's still a far way from whatever Saudi Arabia is doing haha. Personally speaking, search up regarding Islam so you can learn more regarding why what you most see as oppressive may actually be a misperception. All love brother.
turkish islam was also moderate before erdogan, it's the arab islam that makes people fundamentalist
@@PASTRAMIKick Yes, but when the foundation is rotten it is always going to be a ticking time bomb. The fact that 🦃 is where it is today tells you all you need to know.
And how long ago since it was a secular country. What happened to the none muslim politicans. What happens to the minorities. It is slowly going where every country like it goes. And maybe not today and maybe not tomorrow but eventually they will have a genocide just like all similar countries. Cause it is in the texts.
We're living through the self-destruction of liberal democracy and this is equal part sad, scary, and fascinating.
It's great, liberal democracy is the poison that led us here.
Fall of Rome 2.0
We are at the classic point where the tolerant tolerate the intolerant to the limits of tolerance itself, with increasingly diminishing returns for society and increased decadence
this is israeli propaganda nonsense
Facists hate democracies, so it's no suprise that they work so hard to undermine it at every turn. It's just sad that so many are indiffrent to it until it's to late.
3 pillars of islam: men submit to allah, women submit to men and non-muslims submit to muslims
You explained Western system.
This is Western system. Capitalist oligarchs at the top, their political stooges below them and rest of the rabble below them. And they are supposed to submit in that order to each other.
@@thecomment9489 all muslims come in the west begging for free money and freedom .islam does not work well.change the quran.
@@thecomment9489 Human brain: Here's the Quran and the Hadiths
Muslims: Don't insult my religion
You are wrong. But then again, you probably don't care about being right.
Honestly, one thing I don’t get about European liberals is why they support those ☪️ people who oppose liberal values and gay rights, while it's mostly conservatives who seem willing to push back against that.
true
Because the right wants to remove their rights
You think it is fair to judge a country because it has not yet made the societal advances that other countries have? The USA is the good guy in ww2 and yet they had insane segregation back then and more elaborate structural racism. What is not can still be. And people are fighting for it. But treating them like outgroups only motivates them more to stick to traditional believes, even more than in the countries that they are originally from
It`s because they are short sighted and hungry for power. They see the Muslim vote as an easy way to victory. They don`t care that in the long run their values will die out.
Its because they only express opinions which won't ruin their careers or their social life. This is part of that.
This is what made me realize that people who masquerade as progressives today don't care one bit about what happens in the future. All they care about is appearing virtuous right now, consequences be damned. As an actual progressive, I am pretty much in favor of not surrendering the most advanced societies on Earth to religious zealots. If you actually want to preserve liberal values, and even make strides towards improvement, than you will not blindly support anything, and you will speak out against insanity even if it means your life becomes less comfortable as a result.
I mean there is examples of religious fanaticism within Europe as well? Ireland has not until recently become more liberal
You're goddamn right.
you're not a "progressive"
@@jasonhaven7170 Oh trust me, he is. And people like him the best chance we've got for pragmatism, else be damned.
@@jasonhaven7170 Correct, I am not a "progressive", but an actual progressive.
As a Middle Eastern progressive atheist currently living in the ME, I'm very disappointed in what Europe is doing and how it is dealing with Islam. People do not understand how easy it is for foreign countries (and sometimes a single influential religious scholar) to control the Muslim population. A single fatwa by an islamic jurist is enough to put thousands if not millions on the streets to get what they want (it happened in the UK and many other EU countries before), sometimes by force. Right now they might want equality and I don't deny that there are many respectful, kind, and sometimes fairly progressive Muslims who try to be moderate, but as the rate of Muslims entering Europe increases and more radicals enter Europe (Europe tends to accept the more radical Muslims since they live in war-torn/unstable areas, which is why many Muslims in Europe are sometimes more religious than the average Muslim in their home country) the general Muslim community might be encouraged or pressured to become more extreme. For example, I know Muslim women who don't wear/ don't want to wear the hijab themselves but still vehemently defend the Iranian regime and its crackdown on women's rights because they've been told that criticism of the regime benefits heretics and damages Islam. That's because it's very easy to pressure a devout Muslim into supporting a cause that "protects Islam" with considerable lack of opposition or doubt from the general Muslim community, even the moderates. So I personally find it shocking how many of the same people who can't stop complaining about the Catholic church not fully recognizing same-sex relationships/not supporting women's right to access abortion clinics, are the same ones who happily invite religious zealots who couldn't care less/openly encourage the execution or persecution of homosexuals and are still debating whether women have the right to not cover their hair or not, let alone have an abortion, into their country. Of course not every Muslim is like that but many are, and the number of conservative Muslims will only increase in the future. This crisis could break Europe and erase hundreds of years of progress in human rights and tolerance, so I hope Europeans and their leaders stop delaying this debate just because some say that it's "racist" or "islamophobic".
Thank you for your contribution you confirmed what I already heard from many exmuslim friends
Man, I feel you. Living in Syria, looking for a way out
Who cares about if your progressive your culture is destroying the world!!!!
As a secular Atheist, how do you feel about paragraphs?
@@rom1783-c1y I think the Europeans leaders were fully aware. They get what they want. The people pay the price.
"Import the 3th world, become the 3th world".
Three generations ago, Europe was the third world
Christendom was always an empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts. Constantine chose regularly to refer to himself as the “servant of God” (famulus dei/therapon tou theou) in official writings. By the fifth century, this metaphor of subordination had been redeployed from theological to political contexts as the subjects of the emperor came to refer to themselves as “slaves of the emperor.” And by the sixth, Justinian insisted all his officials swear an oath that they would demonstrate their service to the emperor “with genuine slavehood” (gnesia douleia).b Building on Paul’s revalorization of the vocabulary of slavery, and particularly the word doulos came to be applied to a variety of hierarchical relationships, even as it also continued to be used specifically of chattel slaves. By the middle Byzantine period, this expansion of the semantic range of the root doul- eventually gave the abstract nominal form douleia, meaning laborer
Insofar as everyone who partook in labor was considered to be a participant This epistemological world view is coherent with master-slave dynamic relationship between the head of the state and his subjects, or rather slaves.
The word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses:
“Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9
“Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”-1 Samuel 15:3
“Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.”-Hosea 13:16
The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers:
“in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.”
Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as::
“seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.”
Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed:
"Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer".
Evoking several of these verses in practice:
- (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
- (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them...
- (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary.
This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished.
This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah):
"includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit."
This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship."
It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children."
بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة
"To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause"
-Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya
More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah:
حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ»
"Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries"
حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ»
سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ»
"The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly"
This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them.
Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". both the renessiance and the european enlightenment were directly preceded by massive translation movements form Arabic (see the Republic of Letters by Alexander Bevilacqua, The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization By: Jonathan Lyons.
The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context.
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Perhaps KARMA for colonialism😂😂😂😂😂
@@boatmessi123 Doesn't work that way when Muslims themselves are at least equally as guilty of conquest of land, ethnic cleansing, genocide, racism, slavery and destruction of culture as well as erecting empires and are probably known even better than Europeans and Americans for initiating wars particularly with foreigners.
@@boatmessi123 colonialism was good for you, you needed i, and which countries did estonia and finland colonize?
France fought many wars in the past to keep Islam out. Some examples:
732: Battle of Tours: With perhaps 1,500 soldiers, Charles Martel halts a Muslim force of around 40,000 to 60,000 cavalry under Abd al-Rahman ibn Abd Allah al-Ghafiqi from moving farther into Europe. Many regard this battle as being decisive in that it saved Europe from Muslim control.
759: Pippin III captured Narbonne, the last Muslim stronghold in France, and thereby drove Islam out of France.
Now in 2024, France is willingly allowing itself to become Muslim. This is very sad.
Charles had as many soldiers as the Umayyads did, not 1500. Source: La bataille de Poitiers: Charles Martel et l'affirmation de la suprématie des Francs
That was not France but the Carolingian Empire vs Umma yad Caliphate.
These two were two big political entities only using religion for their own purposes.
The survey results early in the video are frightening, to say the least. Europe needs to be very clear-eyed and decisive about the threat to the rule of law and to their Western culture that these sentiments pose. Yikes.
The problem is that these are only three studies. No one is funding properly big studies, it's always these breadcrumbs.
The surveys don't show or tell us the community would remain always religious as the next generation that will come will probably be less religious while at the same time holding to their religion or faith.
@@Inzersdorf93 history is a good statistical basis in itself as well. History shows that spain was enslaved for 600 years by caliphates. East Rome was destroyed by the ottomans. Europeans were second class citizens in bulgaria, spain, greece, egypt (which was back then heavily greek and roman). One of the main goals of islam is to proof it is the one abrahamic religion. Conquest usually was the tool historically. It is a huge failure of eu immigration that many people moving there do not consider themselves european at all.
@@e.d9993 Well there is only data as far as 3rd gen muslims, which was pointed out as the most radical one to date. We don't really have data on how other religions looked when they came here, but for a democratic union it is troubling that half of young muslim adults think Sharia should be over whatever country they are in
@@deounivers7663 Most of those who were asked about the Sharia question don't know it fully as what the questionnaire meant by that as most Islamic countries apply sharia only on family matters and sometimes in financial matters.
At least so far, seems really unlikely Islam’ll ever fit in with Europe. Especially with them becoming more radical and islamic as you say in the start
LOL, as a Muslim, I find it funny how Europeans believe they can coexist with Muslims
@@hydoffdhagaweyne1037 you live in europe?
yup and eu nations literally based on christian values and the ottoman empire wanted to conquer europe until 200-300 years ago lmao
@@hydoffdhagaweyne1037 you live in europe tho?
@@hydoffdhagaweyne1037 Do you live in Europe? Are you worried about the changing political climate? Do you adhere to sharia and do you place it above national law?
I appreciate this. I'm very much a left winger, and generally consider myself 'pro-migrant', but it infuriates me to no end that you have to go to the far right here in Britain before you get anyone talking seriously about the long term issues with migration. Not even our populist right Reform UK really get into it beyond rhetoric.
I'm very keen to have a genuine discussion about the long term impacts of migration, but you really can't do so without being called a racist! From my position, the mass migration we're currently implementing is a form of an arms race among the West - like a "scramble for Africans" - to plunder as much of the young labour, skills, etc from the world's poorest countries. That inevitably leaves the poor world in a much weaker position as they don't have the workforce they need to develop (in the UK, we have more Ghanaian nurses than there are in Ghana). This means that instead of these countries developing like China to become middle income in a generation or two, they are trapped in desperate poverty for far, far longer than they need to be. Purely for the short term economic gain of already rich countries who can't be bothered to train up their own workers.
ye its sad but ppl forget history. ppl also forget that the other culture likely sucks when ppl flee in millions from the other country. Would be way less social pressure to just rebuild the nations with high population loss, instead of taking all young people from them. It is never mentioned how mass immigration kills the origin country until the demographics have regenerated.
This person gets it
cheap labor is very convenient for an elite that lives in a bubble away from you peasants
The people of the west don't want their doctors and engineers
We want to train our own
It's only leftist and billionaires that want them.
Does the UK have more Ghanian nurse than Ghana because they are stealing all the Ghanian nurse or because they are able to make people nurses more easily.
In my experience, when muslims claim they're being discriminated what they actually mean is that they're not granted privileges and aren't allowed to perform religious stuff that goes against European laws and/or morality.
"European morality" lmao
@@leodarksam6230 Yes. Every society has norms and not all of them are written down in paper. Europeans are not an exception to that statement.
@@LoForayea not having polygamy allowed is so oppressive smh
"European morality" Sure kido.
"European morals" aka generally culturally Christian liberal Ethics
EU-Wide if the organisation/mosque/whatever is advocating for Sharia Law it should be banned. Seems to be an easy non-brainer and I'm baffled it isn't the case yet.
ye its literally a human rights disregarding cult org per definition.
Nah that's right wing hate speech! Embrace Islam! Chose sharia law it is the progressive way forward! And Europe isn't racist or conservative, right??!!
Sharia is a vague term that covers things from avoiding eating pork and drinking alcohol to stoning for adultery. People need context as to what “advocacy for sharia” is
No respectable mosque or Imam would advocate for what you're thinking of (i.e. imposing islamic laws on a whole nation). This is very unislamic, the islamic/sharia ruling for living in a non-muslim nation is to integrate as much as possible without sacrificing your faith (don't drink alcohol, go to local religious temples, etc...)
Imposing Islam on anyone is literally commanded against in the Quran (2:256), and is strictly prohibited.
Unfortunately there are muslims who themselves don't even understand this.
i think most people who advocate for it have little idea what it fully entails tbh
Poland has no problem with Islam. It also has low social benefits in comparison to the West.
Yeah, because Poland doesn't take in a lot of immigrants from Muslim countries. By far the biggest portion of the immigrants, that Poland takes in are Ukrainians, and they don't cause much trouble. That is why Poland is now much safer than all the countries that took in Muslims.
It has people leaving to seek a better life.
@@hamsatd not really, not anymore. Used to be so in 2000s, not so in 2020s. source: I live there, happily, and confident of a better future. And so are many other people. Some Polish people are actually coming back to the country after having emigrated in 2000s and 2010s.
Poland is built on loans from the western core so it can act as a buffer against Russia. Polande success is not Polands own work. The country is built on socialism and then today that structure is maintained by international banking.
@@hamsatd yeah, but those people integrate well in those societies.. here in Germany Poles are even assimilated... you can't tell apart a German from a Pole.. unlike many Muslims that still see the Native Germans as weak and inferior.. many Turks still identify as Turks, even if they are born here.. they still choose to name their children Ali or Fatma.
In The US, you have a non ethnic nationalism.
Something that’s unites the people over a single idea. But in Europe because they’re afraid of ethnic ultranationalism, they gave up over nationalism completely!
And they’re not united over any idea anymore.
Some parts did, some didn't and some have kept their more chill from the start stance.
Extremes are the priviledge of the great and powerful, in whatever which way.
In my country, any nationalist will be associated with the colonial past and the many mistakes we made in our history.
@@geertgietman indeed, with certain, mostly bigger or more influential countries, imperialism, colonialism and nationalism have formed a coherent system, mostly the backbone of the 19th and 20th centuries, but its vestiges can more clearly be felt in say Russia, which's colonial history is simply one by land, not by sea.
Smaller countries have always focused more on self preservation and thus their nationalism is both less violent and more tolerant, perhaps also more progressive, but of course, especially at their "peaks" in a way, the outright problematic or at least ambitious stuff has revealed itself.
The same type of imperialist nationalism once ruling much of Europe is still going strong around the world and even in Europe its revival can be seen in many places (the smaller nations without an imperial past have remained more progressive and balanced comparatively).
The women of Europe have a lot to look forward to...
They voted for this madness
There is no more killing woman your western wars look at Gaza right now! Imbecile!
Low fertility rate is killing Europe.
Denmark's approach seems the best. Also, there should be a culture test questionnaire before granting a visa. Hardcores wouldn't lie on it 😂
What do you mean? Anyone can lie
As a muslim I find this better, than selling "tolerance and freedom of religion" BS where doesn't exist
Europe today has made an artificial culture that does not reflect its true culture which is connected to Asia.
@@weamibrahim2146A person failed to obtain German citizenship because he wouldn’t shake the woman official’s hand. So clearly it would weed out at least some hardcores.
@@abcdqwerty3562 oh I understand now thanks
at what point did Europe for the Europeans become so "bigoted", you could literally say the same thing about africa, MENA, and so on, and in those cases it's totally fine, something went really wrong along the way and now the western societies are actively trying to destroy themselves...
It was colonialism, neoliberalism and the general attitude of the western bloc during the cold war. Europe brought this upon itself. It has no right to complain now. go and deal with it.
@@nostur4984 We would deal with it but then Americans and their international banking overlords would get angry.
Destabilizing countries also didn't help.
@@kavky so you're at the forefront of the mess and you're doing absolutely nothing to help the rest of us even though eco parties and Varoufakis' Diem are right there? Yeah...
@@nostur4984 Bro you forget who sent the firefighters to help you with those summer fires. We the individual countries have no say in what the eurocrats decide.
At least Eastern Europe is safe from this madness. Also, we need to accept that some cultures are simply not compatible with European ones and stop ignoring the obvious problems with it. The UK needs a massive anti-terrorism taskforce for things like Christmas and it is slowly starting to suppress and prosecute anyone critical of Islam, which is incredibly scary and worrying, especially as Muslims start occupying more and more positions in the government and get more influence.
I have a really hard time imagining how the UK will be by 2050-60, let alone 2100. British white children are already a minority and the Islamic religion is being taught in public schools alongside many children being bullied for not being Muslim or girls for not wearing a hijab. Not only that but all of the progress that Europe made in terms of women's rights and LGBT are slowly but surely being eroded (not so much in terms of legislation but, rather, fear and violence).
Women and LGBT rights being eroded is one positive thing that will come out of this
@@username-ek1kd I'd prefer that women do not have to wear a hijab.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has been majority Muslim since the 1600s and we are quite peaceful other than ethnic divisions.
@@enismustafic3875 Bosnia and Albania are completely different worlds compared to what we are talking about here.
As Indonesian it baffles me how majority of muslim in european country can be a fundamentalist. Heck, the statistic that said that younger generation become more fundamentalist is insane, at least compared to here.
Because they change the definition of fundamentalism
Funnily enough, in the Netherlands Indonesians are one of the most integrated groups.
@@RK-cj4oc I'm pretty sure that one phenomenon is because we were colonized by the dutch and have almost zero grudge to our colonizer. This is not unique to Netherlands, I'm pretty sure this happen to Japan too.
@@acatreassuresyouthateveryt7842 That is possible. Personally i believe it is because Indonesians just have a very welcoming and confident culture that does not rely on violence . So they integrated better and interact more with Dutch people. In Dutch school muslims boys and men often self segerate themselves into their own groups. Indonesians rarely take part in that.
@@RK-cj4oc I hope that is the reason, yes.
The surveys shown during the 6th minute are crazy
I am 30 yo muslim grown up in europe and i have yet to encounter a single muslim that says sharia law should be above local law. This is of course an anecdote but it really makes me wonder where all these people are
@furkan3945 most probably wouldnt admit if asked
@@furkan3945 Wouldn't you say that rules made up by a god who can supposedly punish you for eternity are more important than those made up by humans? "What's the worst thing humans can do, send you to god?" I think this is how respondents interpret this question.
I imagine a higher percentage would respond in favor of local law when asked specifically about one of the gruesome laws and punishments of Sharia, relying on morality instead.
@@michelbruns admit what? I am here for an open conversation as an into europe fan. Ask me a question. Not even my relatives in turkey that live in one of the most religious provinces think sharia should be above the turkish law.
@@CjqNslXUcM indeed the way the question was posed can make a difference. No one that really believes in a religion would admit that religion is just a hobby and the government is above everything. But in daily life they still adhere and support the state they grow up in. Maybe a better way of asking a question would be whether someone is willing to break local laws (& go to prison or sth) because sharia says so. I believe almost everyone would say no then.
It's turning into a Muslim AND African expansion. Remember that it's not only migrants from the Middle East heading to Europe. Europeans must unite together as one to combat this madness that's destroying a great, historical, and beautiful continent.
The thing is even if everyone in the middleast moved here to eu, They would still be outnumbered 1 to 4. Its just seems alot cause of how many got in since 2014 and honestly these calculations that this guy did is from recent years when whole of brussles was red & green. With the 2024 results the right to asylum immigration policies that has existed will be revoked & its already happening. Article 18 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 06 January 2025. (from eu parlament's website)
Stolen goods should be returned back to all the colonized areas then, by that logic.
The damage is done. Its easy to allow millions into your countries but extremely hard to get rid of them. Soon these people will have a voice, take part in policy making and it surely won’t be for the benefit of the European lifestyle. Europe has lost. I would invite the creators of this madness Ursula and Angela to take a stroll through one of the no-go zones in cities like Malmo, Frankfurt, Paris and London, no security just two well dressed ladies taking a walk in a culturally vibrant cities they have created.
Who had the Islamic caliphate of Europe on their year 2100 bingo card?
I doubt world will exist that long
The left.
Maybe Germany.. maybe England..
@@SaadBinAlamgir3345 it will.. insha'Allah 😂
This is not true bro Islam is 1400 years old
As a Muslim who was born in the uk, I don’t get why many Muslims who are also born here turn radical or try to turn the west into an Islamic country. I love England and it’s my home and I’d never try to change it and I think you can be European as well as Muslim but some people are just problematic and extremist
I'm always afraid of Muslims in UK like Mohammad Hijab, Ali Dawah etc who openly propose the capital punishment for apostates.
Bro can you tell what percent of Muslims in your neighborhood are extremists?
Centrists will never provide adequate solutions, which will inevitably lead to a hard right solution, whether we like it or not something has to be done
@@ciupenhauer that’s probably what 1933 Germans said. Go on and repeat that mistake but leave the rest of society out of this, thank you very much ❤️
@@everydaylife5641well it’s because the other couldn’t provide a solution so they got in to power … and we know how that turned out.
@@everydaylife5641 How was that a mistake? I would love to see that repeat.
@@everydaylife5641he says as Germany sleepwalks into the exact same path because they didn't do anything about the issue
@@inteallsviktigt A solution to what? There was no real problem there, they were just the scape-goats for a bunch of problems Germany had and a bunch of hate followed.
Oh boy these comments are gonna be something aren’t they? 😭 Huge props to you for covering such a controversial topic with integrity
video sucked
It's only controversial to un serious people.
I felt that while the author tried to stay neutral, there were several instances of cherrypicking, manipulation and cause substitution in his video.
Whether it was intentional or just a cognitive bias, I don't know. But I feel it should be addressed, because the video feels one-sided in the end.
It's only controversional for those who are not willing to make any changes about i
@@Anon-y4w what have you been missing? tell us!
My condolences and empathy goes to Michael Stürzenberger, who barely survived a vicious and cold blooded knife attack in Mannheim Germany for merely criticizing the political Islam.
My condolences goes to all muslims and non-muslim germans who got attacked by the police just for wearing pro-palestinian symbols
@@Megaspinosaurusrexthey weren't killed tho
@@Megaspinosaurusrexdon’t you dare to spread such disgusting misinformation. Police officers risk their lives every day to ensure the safety of the general public. You don't know what their relatives are going through. In constant fear of receiving the terrible news that their son, brother or husband has been killed by an Islamist. Police officers deserve nothing but respect. Shame on you for your deviant comment. The perpetrators are ALWAYS pro-Palestinians
@@Megaspinosaurusrex Anti semitism is a crime in Germany. The police are upholding the rule of law.
@@Megaspinosaurusrexno
Proud of Poland, Romania Hungary and Czech little Muslim population
As a Pole, I'm really happy and content it is that way. I hope it stays that way
The are poor European country who want to go low economic growth countries.
@@linakhan331 They are still much wealthier than the rest of the world. Also the gap is narrowing each year.
@@linakhan331 the difference is decreasing year by year, not to mention that, as many, many developing countries are majority christian instead, you could have mass immigration without any muslims. Not to mention the situations of Ukraine and Russia etc, whose disporas have spread across the rest of Europe for different reasons over the centuries, them also retaining christian beliefs, if any at all.
@@Frodo1000000 What about native polish muslims?
But the politicians and MSM are telling us that this isn't happening. But simultaneously telling us that it is happening and that it is a good thing.
To think that Persia, now Iran, was one of the most developed and enlightened countries not even so long ago. And they were for centuries. In terms of science, laws, handsome people and tolerance. The stuff of legends, literally. If feel that no matter if you live in Jakarta, Rio or London, that is or should be interesting because it helps put things into perspective.
Interesting fact: according to online Teheran polls, only 40% of the Iranians are Muslim. But since it's (supposedly) dangerous to admit to apostasy or atheism, most still declare themselves Muslim.
Persia under the original 3 caliphates was still developed and enlightened what destroyed it was the constant and very brutal Turkish/mongol hordes the Seljuk then mongols and then timur who alone killed 80% of Persia population and others who killed many as well and also destroyed many of Persia important cultural cities though through it all Persia came back under the Islamic Safavid and for awhile we’re doing amazing they were developed and enlightened then the Safavid fell due to internal issues then they had a brief hope with the afsharids but someone killed the king and that was that for Iran for the next 2 centuries until just before the Islamic revolution where in their later years they actually had a good future ahead of them the shah was listening to the people and they were heading towards a western leaning tolerant rich and developed constitution monarchy but no one forgot the decades where the shah brutally oppressed them and the fact that everyone knew he wasn’t the legitimate leader extremely unfortunate but what are you gonna do
Mongols and Shiism destroyed Iran. Sunni Iran was a place of learning.
>handsome people
Hahahahaha
They were developped in handsome people... ok?
But then if you know you realize that it's not about religion but about socio-political changes then?
It is clear that Islam is the problem, not Europe as other religious immigrants (Hindus, Buddhists etc) do not cause any problems of this kind and are more than willing to accept that human rights and the constitution of the country is non negotiable. The fact the muslims disagree shows that they have no willingness to integrate. This coupled with European governments being too scared or politically correct to truly call out the issue as it is, is very concerning.
The newer generations of immigrants being more radical should not come as a surprise to anyone. The first generation immigrants coming from muslim countries have seen firsthand the suffering and broken societies created by strong islamic values and are more willing to reject it.
The further generations, growing up in Europe taking human rights for granted have not seen this and thus directly fall for the strong islamic propaganda without having the reality of an islamic society to balance it out. The new generation immigrants believing more strongly in Islam than the first generation is like leftist people living in capitalist societies calling for communism without having experienced the pains of living in a communist society.
The muslims calling for an Islamic caliphate in Europe, why don't they take a trial of it in Afghanistan? It is a true caliphate.
The perceived discrimination is overblown imo as they are the ones who are unwilling to engage in discussion or debate over the role of their religion, making it almost taboo to even have peaceful criticism. Such constructive criticism immediately gets viewed as Islamophobia. Also, aren't they being discriminatory against the beliefs of the other 80% of european residents by calling for things like Sharia law and establishment of islamic caliphates?
It's going to be a great day for human rights and global society the day middle easter oil money stops flowing.
Thank you for making this detailed and well researched video that many others lack the guts to make.
Younger generations becoming more radicalized is due to the Western Invasion into their lands. Wouldnt you become bitter and keep a huge burden inside your heart when you grew up in war and very likely lost a relative because of it? And all you had is hope that you get out of this miserable situation? People try to ignore the fact WHY they become radicalized than older generations, BUT i still agree that just because you basicly lived your whole life in nothing but misery, you shouldnt keep your burden inside your heart. Islam teaches that, but humans are still humans and still do mistakes.
The amount of lies you just spoke here is insane.
never let bro give a microphone
@@yodawg
what does asking for Shari'a law has to do with burden of invasion? they are no asking to stop invasion but for Shari'a law!
Underrated comment
As a Iranian 🇮🇷 i can tell you the majority of people are leaving Islam, we are only in name Islam
Yeah Shia islam isn't doing so well
Good, about time.
In iran maybe, not worldwide
That does seem to be a very Iranian thing currently. Not shared across the world though.
Shia is not even a real religion, it's just a conspiracy theory
Really great and nice video. You covered all the points i wanted. As a Dane, im really satisfied with the depths, specifically covering many central issues in Denmark.
Remember also that the danish social democrats completely switched their opinion on immigration, and saw huge success. Or the Mohammad drawings causing a big scandal.
i really appreciate the video man! keep it up
Amazing video and exactly what we need for the moderates and liberals to understand that it's definitely a topic that deserves our attention
It is a topic that deserves our attention, and I think recently it does have our attention.
However, the video feels one-sided in the end, still.
We've been invaded - none of this is by consent
I didin't give my consent to the Brits and French to divide Kurdistan into 4 countries where they later would launch a coalition invasion and force my family to flee to Europe. But you dont see me crying like a little baby, instead i search for the truth
@Sparkizo you are right now KURDISTAN IS GONE
Sadly it is. It's the consequence of the results of democratic elections. People are politically illiterate.
Europeans...talking about being invaded...WITHOUT CONSENT?
Ion even have to explain bro u jus reap what u sow ig
@@Réessayethe Muslim empire also expended through conquest
from 711, when Tariq crossed the strait of Gibraltar, until 1492, when the Catholic Kings conquered Granada, there were 782 years of continuous religious war between Christianity and Islam. There was time in those 8 centuries to find accommodation between the two societies, and none was found. It's in the history books.
How about you read of the historic example the Caliphate of Cordoba set, being one of the most religiously tolerant and culturally rich societies in Europe at the time. In Spain Muslims and Christians fought against each other just as much as they fought amongst themselves.
@@costantinochianale4904That's pretty much a lie. The Caliphate of Cordoba was as bad as the other states around them. Let's not forget that the Visigothic Kingdom was invaded by the Muslims and both the nobility and peasantry were persecuted by the new regime
@@Seraph2077 As they did to the romans in the area and as the romans did to the celts and native iberians. My point is that Cordoba was demonstrably more tolerant of its christian and jewish population. Need I remind you that both muslims and jews were fully expelled from Spain in 1492, to the point that Thessaloniki in greece had a majority of spanish speakers just from the jewish refugees that went to the Ottoman empire. I'm assuming you're spanish from your name and rhetoric, I really would encourage you to read up on your muslim history, it's a great point of national pride that you're missing out on just because they followed a different god.
@@costantinochianale4904 " being one of the most religiously tolerant and culturally rich societies in Europe at the time."
Because the standards were extremely low.
It was still apartheid.
Maybe is Europe embraced Islam there would be compatibility
I am concerned Europe will go to war over this
You really think the USA will invade us again if we reject their globalist leaders?
The concern would be if they dont go to war over this.
I struggle to see it happening - the elites want Europeans to become a minority: and the populations would rather pretend it's not happening.
The mathematics of demography mean time is very, *very* short to save the situation. Another 10 years of the same course and it will be too late.
It almost seems like an inevitability
Diaspora people often have identity crisis and turn to a hard core form of Islam and a Us vs them mentality. The natives of their home origin countries absolutely hate their diaspora because it feels as if they’re cosplaying as a nationality. Natives are way cooler
This!!! I second this. I wish more people realised this. European "Muslims" look down on us and see their homeland as nothing more than a holiday destination all the while they pretend they're more religious than us. Like, if you love your homeland so much why don't you come live here with us??? They're hypocrites
I’m an American watching this. Seeing religion seem above real-world laws makes me sick. If you move to a country, you respect their values. I hope to move to Switzerland, but I hope that these radical religious views don’t ruin the continent.
lol saying that as an American is peak irony
Start by removing the mention of God in your dollar bills
@@shafsteryellowwhy dont he follow animism or something like that😅
Real-world laws are shaped by society’s view of right and wrong, which is inherently subjective. In many Western countries, these views evolve over time. Preferring Sharia law over state law is not necessarily a radical stance; it’s actually a mainstream view among many Muslims. Why should it be an issue to hold a perspective on what is right and wrong? Ultimately, the people living in a society determine its values and laws.
How exactly do Christian’s do it? lol doesn’t make no sense at all.
You follow the rules of your country and you follow the rules of your religion.
Hypothetically
As a Christian would you say that you follow the state law first and then the religious law. Yes?
That’s only because the law doesn’t have any thing contradictory to religion. Which is the case for Islam too
But let’s say state law would idk ban all non meat foods for the time of Easter fasting.
Would you follow your religious law and try to find anything other than meat, even though illegal? Or would you just not fast?
My point is that the Islamic „law“ is a set of morals a Muslim should follow. And there should be no real clash between state law and religious law.
If there is a clash, then it is because state law wants to enforce something on Moral law.
Finally someone who isn't afraid to dive into this topic and actually discuss it in a non political way. Really well balanced and well presented video. You give all the data needed and arguments from both sides. The issue of Islam in Europe is huge and it is time to being able to have an open discussion about it without being labelled far right or racist for just mentioning it.
Then don't hate on Muslims
I have one slight correction: it’s more fitting to describe the „Muslim Countries“ as Muslim majority countries as there governments tend to be secular monarchies or dictatorships.
2. beeing „more relaxed“ than dictatorships and monarchies is not a bar to set for ourselves in Europe
We must come back to our christian roots, and not let get radical islam get a foothold.
It was the abandonment of “Christian roots” that allowed Europe to prosper. We need a secular society free of religious nonsense
Agreed @@sccm100
@@sccm100 Stalin agrees with you
Our roots are actually pagan, by the way. Becoming more Christian will result in similar hellholes as a lot of those Muslim countries. Europe is too smart to be religious, unfortunately too kind a tolerant towards people who don't reciprocate.
@@sccm100 lmao europe was majority christian up until ww2 what are you talking about
Remigration.
My thoughts
The moment some one or group advocates for sharia law they are arrested or kicked out the country
The moment they threaten anyone under religious pretences Arrested and or kicked out the country
The moment ANY VIOLENCE happens in relation do to their religion Arrested or kicked out the country
Also Criticism should not be silenced but allowed public spaces just like with any other ideology or religion.
as a muslim i agree with all points that have been stated, but i feel as though the "criticism" being given is just disrespect, but hey freedom of speech is the first amendment, so i can't really complain about that. it's like when people deny the holocaust. i mean sure, they can do it, but it's really disrespectful
@@adamelghalmi9771It turns into disrespect because the threat of violence from muslims often lead to disrespect. If muslims were more accepting of critisism the type of critisism would also be more normal.
@@adamelghalmi9771Also. Wtf. Critising the holocaust is in no way equal to disagreeing with islam. Wtf? The Holocaust is something that people lived through and we know happend. Islam is a religion.
@@adamelghalmi9771 anyone should be able to crticize any ideas. Islam included, no special treatment. It's weird that you think Islam should be immune to criticism
@@RK-cj4oc To be fair I don't think he was saying that they are the same in damage more so a really bad wording of "Its really bad that people say X but freedom of speech dictates that it should be allowed"
The whole video is so well documented but just misses the point. We are not dealing with Islam as an alive force or monster. Islam is a book, words and values. By wich PEOPLE live. We are dealing with PEOPLE. And it's pretty obvious that a manipulated and shaped by circumstances at that.
If your contry muslim percentage is above 20% ,then you are fucked
Sure, indian kid, sure...
@Satoshi-yd7lj malyasia has 3.5 millions population, mumbai and Bengaluru these 2 cities have more population than malyasia.
No comparison
UK does seem to be only place to not have a political backlash against Islam (tho it did have a violent backlash this summer), note how Reform UK is the only major Far-Right party in Europe not to have an explicit anti-Islam platform
That's true, there's been recent Tommy Robinson's Syrian Refugee case controversy though.
Yeah, but what would an explicit anti-Islam platform actually look like?
It would probably be illegal. British people also spend more hours on average consuming media & therefore have a smaller overton window of acceptable thought.
there is no far right party in the entire western world. all these positions are standard nationalist positions from just 50 years ago
The problem is Islam is not simply a religion - it's a law and value system that is not compatible with laws and values of European countries. The fist basic rule of integration is respecting the traditions and laws of a country you are integrating with. Islam and it's many divides is the major reason why we even have so many refugees this days.
As a European I think that governments HAVE to be secular - separation of church and state is one of our greatest achievements and I would like it to stay where it is.
The vast majority of "muslim states" were secular. However, they were also brutal and horrible. Thus, people see secularism as tyranny and islamism as freedom.
Just imagining where we are headed to makes me sick. It just feels so unfair and like Europeans haven’t had a say in this at all. I am beyond disgusted.
Hello I am a German Muslim here.
Germans arent muslim
You aren’t German ☺️
Ethnic german? Or german national?
@@Juan-qu4ojMarcel Krass
From your account name I doubt it
Deportations
Raids and deportations
Do you think that recent events in Afghanistan will open the eyes of radicalized European Muslims, especially women and girls?
Your channel is one of my favorites! 🇪🇺💙
Ah yes afghanistan, my favorite european country
lol no, it will maybe cause the reverse
Afghanistan doesn't follow the full Sharia law for example education in Islam women and men have the right to education in fact seeking religious and worldly knowledge is an act of worship + having any job that he's society for example being a doctor is an act of worship too. Many of the laws in Afghanistan are tribal laws that come from the Pashtunwalli code/way of life (it's like the Japanese bushido Samurai code) that was practiced before they accepted Islam. (Namoos), in Pashto, means - my woman, my gun, my home, my honor. It means, in essence, my everything. Women are seen as precious and they aren't meant to be seen shared with others. You can search and read about all the laws. If you don't follow these laws you are not a Pashtun or an Afghan. If you don't follow these you are not part of a tribe/family. You can learn about the Pashtunwalli code it is mostly good it has things like justice, love, honor, loyalty, hospitality, bravery, arbitration, selflessness, and protection (even if your enemy seeks your protection you must protect your life), respect, the only few that have some problem with Islam is pride, revenge (forgiveness is better than revenge), and Namoos (Islamic modesty is better than Namoos). They give the most respect to their mother she is like queen bee. Afghanistan follows Pashutnwalli more than Islam. Which makes it not a Sharia. Namoos also means the absolute defense of women. In their tribal world view they ar protecting women.
The West wasn't smart when they tried to bring democracy to tribal people who loved their kings, their code of life, and their religion.
@@Megaspinosaurusrex what's afghanistan's location got to do with anything
Well well well… they are leaving their “lovable, delightful, religious” countries to Europe and surely it’s not because they want “better” life. They just don’t understand that if Europe got annexed it would be very “lovable” like their countries. Save Europe…
*All that goes around comes around.*
What did Europe and the west expect when they invaded those countries and created chaos and left millions of people homeless?
And then on top of that, took in those millions as refugees for "cheap labor" with all their trauma and PTSDs. what cloud go wrong here...
I guess we are responsible as well, more so than them.
muslim countries are not all that religious. that is a myth europeans made up at home. they're more or less the same as european countries in that regard save for 3 countries. but only 3. the emergence of radical islam (which is almost strictly a european phenomenon) is the result of Saudi interference like Into Europe himself pointed out at 20:05.
Maybe stop buying Saudi oil????? or kick turkey out of nato????
Too late.
@@Réessaye colonist
Islam has nothing to add to European culture, Europe is a continent rich in art, science, architecture and cuisine, not to mention that it is the cradle of Christianity, secularism and various social movements.
Europe is not the cradle of Christianity in fact Christianity reached ethopia and sudan before it reached Europe from the middle East
@theblackgods4699 The Christianity we know is of European origin. It was European Christianity that was spread throughout the world and not this supposed Christianity from Africa that you say exists!
@@pedroarthurbarbosa I never said Christianity came from Africa I said it came from the middle East .which it did the texts that Europeans based their beliefs on came from the middle East. Wether you're a Catholic or protestant the core idea of Christianity is the belief in christ and his divine parentage which ultimately comes from the middle East. So essentially Europeans just spread the religion that was spread to them.
@@pedroarthurbarbosa also there is no Christianity of European origin there are denominations of European origin but Christianity itself can only have one origin which is judea (Israel/palestine)
Islam actually add to a lot of scienctifict findings. And Christianity is from the middle east not europe
This video should be a mandatory watch for everyone. Just facts, no opinions.
As an American Muslim I think this video was about as impartial as could be reasonably expected. I do want to make one correction though. The Quran nowhere states Muslims are not allowed to have non-Muslim friends or acquaintances, the verse cited 5:51 is a prohibition on taking them as allies or guardians. The Quran actually states to deal with nonviolent non-Muslims kindly. “Allah does not forbid you from dealing kindly and fairly with those who have neither fought nor driven you out of your homes. Surely Allah loves those who are fair.” Quran 60:8
The Quran is one thing, but actual moderate and extreme Muslims teach each other and their kids not to have non-Muslim friends and lovers. See channel "Candid With Lubna" for examples, as well as other YT channels created by ex-Muslims who do interviews, interviewers and the interviewees both confirm the this notion.
As I stated elsewhere under this video, for each non-violence Quran verse you can find two violence-inducing ones, and vice versa. And there are multiple interpretations of Quran, even though Muslims insist there's just one, reality shows otherwise. Relating to Quran verses as if they were an indication of the reality surrounding us is a void argument. Mind you I'm not saying this to offend you - it just is this way. Noone cares if Quran says such thing in one verse or another (especially that you can find contradicting verses - I'm not going to go into it, there's plenty of channels on YT doing that) when real-world Muslims are behaving differently.
@ I mean respectfully I try not care too much about things outside of my control. There are obviously people around the world of every persuasion who teach their kids to be racist, discriminatory, or hateful and I don’t think anyone needs to watch an interview to know that’s manifest.
I don’t really know what kind of hyperbole you’re using to describe Quran verses because of course there are way more non-violent verses in book 114 chapters long that covers a plethora of topics. And just like anything, people can absorb information in different ways and apply their own interpretations. In Islam we have something called tafsir though which use to develop our understanding. Now as far as contradictions go, no one seriously attributes to the Quran a contradictory nature, that is scholarly or academic, as opposed to whatever little RUclips videos you may have watched. I would honestly discourage watching other people before actually reading the book yourself, if nothing else to not look ignorant moving forward. I say this genuinely not to say it’s purposeful or that’s your character. I know I have ignorance about certain things and try to not engage people until I have good surface level understandings. But yea not taking non-Muslim friends is just an inaccurate translation so feel free to friend us up.
@@Frodo1000000 The percentage of "violent" verses in the Quran is lower than other mainstream religious books. Most muslims don't have a problem with having friendly interactions. Mariage is another question, it doesn't mean hostility.
If no one cares about the Quran's message, and the Quran is open to various interpretation. Then why do people who are against muslims use it as argument in the first place? Why bring up the Quran?
@@Frodo1000000I asked chatgpt and it says there's about 70 out of 6,236 verse that talk about violence, conflict, and warfare, but with context and historical events, so do you have any evidence that for each non-violence Quran verse you can find two violence-including onse?
@@pixel_dank Plenty of ex-muslim channels like Apostate Prophet already doing that. Sorry, I don't care enough to spend extra time on that. It's a figure of speech, too.
If there is something that I genuinely despise about capitalism, is that for money corporations are willing to do anything, with no regard to society at all, the fact that they refused sponsorship for this particular video is further proof of that.
Europe is done.
It looks like NATO allies will need to do a little more than matching the 2% spend target.
Western countries have largely abdicated their roles in integrating minorities, thinking it would be chauvinistic. This overly permissive environment is to blame for a lack of integration.
I believe that the Singaporean approach handles best, we cannot deny that (as a sum of its proponents) Islam is becoming an established community in Europe, and we cannot spend the rest of our shared existence going to war over what we should do with them; instead we need to amplify voices who are willing to coexist peacefully, not the black/white debate on total acceptance or total rejection, the gradual exhaustion from both sides will eventually lead to everyone realising that peace is the mutually beneficial option.
How many Muslims in Singapore ?
@@JoAtat 15% which is way more than Western Europe, maybe try finishing the video.
They can leave anytime they want if they don't like it. Most of them aren't native Europeans, unlike the ones in Singapore.
Tbh I really am glad that the US doesn’t really have this problem remotely as bad as Europe does. I studied Islam as a teenager and I know that moderate Islam really is a thing, but fear over unrestricted Muslim migration is 100% justified.
America is next after we fall.
Their ways are simply not compatible with ours, not saying I hate all of them, but there comes a time when they either stand by our values, our culture, respect our past, and respect our people, or be kicked out, because from what I'm seeing happen in my home nation of Sweden is that most of them that believe in Sharia law just want to cause trouble, but who am I to talk when caring about your people is being a "Nazi Fascist"
I don't want to sound like a crazy right wing ook but look at Posen and Nederlands as an example.Posen maintained a hardline stance against migration well before the current administration everyone was welcome in Nederlands.Europe become soft and liberal which is why it was so easy for muslim culture to infltrate.Europe abounded her relgion and culture and now she is being punished for it
Culture of imperialism and mass murder.
Her religion? Do you mean paganism??
@prsimoibn2710 Stop being silly a continent can evolve besides several elements of paganism such a certain traditions have been integrated into christianity.You need to understand that the values that helped Europe succeed so much are drawn upon from Christianity.Values such as benevolence and justice.
@prsimoibn2710 Judging from your other comments everything seems linear to you and your quite snarky and sarcastic.Life is not a straight line it's more of road that changes and divides into different paths
Well done. Sad that I feel like you should be called brave for talking about factual statistics
I think Swedish or Denmark's approach is good. Because of Muslims believe I don't think they can integrate in European society unless Europe promotes European style Islam far Less violent more tolerant and with humanistic values but it feels like that's just a eutopia.
We wish to tolerate it, but will they tolerate our ways, will they tolerate our freedoms, will they tolerate our culture is the real question.
Having a blasphemy law in itself is ridiculous for a secular country!
I think we should at the very least not allow foreign countries to finance European Islam. Arriving at a liberal view of Islam really is key. Fundamentalist Islam is incompatible with our liberal democracy, just as fundamentalist Christian sects are.
You don't understand the teachings of islam.Islam is noncompatible with anything except islam not even with christianity.Start learning about islam then you will understand it is cult not a religion.
While I think this is a great idea, I don't think there's a way to properly enforce it.
honest question, define liberal Islam and fundemntal islam ?
@@AhmedSamy87 Fundmentalist Islam is just Fundamentalism.
Here is the read:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalism
Secular countries do the same in Muslim countries tho there's 100s of NGOs and think tanks propogating western liberal values in Muslim countries
Ban all religious practice outdoors.
This is not the USSR
Ban all religious practices*
@@JanHQin regards to Islam we need to become worse then that
@@Victorvondoom9159 "As a Muslim myself, why don't you just implement anti-immigration policies aimed at limiting the amount of immigrants rather than mumbling about it online!?" - JanHQ
@JanHQ the problem with some people ain't one religion but all religions . Faith and beliefs are dangerous if they go a dangerous path. With me it's the individual that must take accountability for their actions
To all my Dutch friends...
Love & best wishes from India 🇮🇳😇❤️
Dankjewel, groetjes terug!
I have much respect to how you’ve tackled this subject. Based on data, and avoiding bias in both directions.
Europe certainly must prevent radical movements and undue influence.
There is no islamophobie but there will be if the things will stay as it is. The amount of chaos crreated in the name of islam grow early, and in the last year it has skyrocketed
This was a really well made video!
We in Romania have a small (under 1%), native population of muslim Turks and Tatars that are very well adapted. We are also seeing a growth in Arab muslims. But all the mosques have imams that are under the recognised Mufti . Being part of a recognized religious organization and not just anyone that preaches whatever he wants makes for better imams, less spreading of hate and intolerance. Why can anyone preach anything in mosques in Western Europe? Christian priests are also called to order by their superiors if their teachings get extremist. But in the name of religious liberties, Western Europe is allowing for a lot of intolerance.
Because secularism...
There’s a lot to unpack and debunk here:
Salafism spread in Europe from 1980 to 2000, during the Sahwa period, when Saudi Arabia poured around $100 billion into spreading Salafist ideas globally. The money went into building Salafist mosques, publishing books, and funding various Salafist conferences. Salafist groups found their strongest following among young Muslims in poorer areas, where people often felt disconnected from both their parents' Sunni religiosity and society. They pushed for young muslims to separate themselves from wider society and even justified political violence in religion's name. What's particularly concerning is how they've used legitimate concerns about anti-Muslim discrimination as a recruitment tool. Instead of helping, they've often made things worse by encouraging isolation. Internet forums and social media have made it much easier for them to reach young people. The Salafist ideology contributed nothing to the Muslim communities.
The main reason to explain what people call "parallel societies" is the economic factor which you barely mentioned, because most Muslims in Europe come from working-class backgrounds and often live in poorer areas. These families often stay in these poor areas because they have limited chances to move up economically, coupled with high unemployment rates makes economic segregation worse. The cost of housing can keep people concentrated in certain areas too.
It’s important to note that these patterns have happened with other immigrant groups and are not only unique to Muslims. Many Muslims are well-integrated and live in mixed neighbourhoods. Highlighting issues related to immigration and integration is often a powerful populist tool used by Right wing politicians in elections.
The fact that European Muslims spend money on halal products and businesses doesn't mean they are against integration, which is ridiculous to say. These Halal friendly businesses pay their VAT and corporation tax to the government which means they’re integrated. Halal products and businesses were setup to cater to the religious and cultural needs of the Muslim community. Just like the Chinese have Chinatown, Italians have Little Italy, and Jews have Kosher friendly businesses. Halal friendly businesses often serve a wide range of customers, and the demand for such products isn’t limited to Muslims.
European anti-radicalization laws, such as banning the hijab or shutting down Muslim charities, are just Islamophobic laws that does not help reduce radicalization at all. Often seen as collective punishment aimed at Muslim communities because of actions caused by Salafists who are a minority. Some security experts have even pointed out that these measures could actually back up claims made by Salafist groups that all European states and societies are deeply anti-Islam, even though this isn’t true. This approach may end up causing more division instead of creating long term solutions.
The Henry Jackson Society that you cited, is a right wing and Islamophobic think tank. It was founded by Alan Mendoza and few others. Mendoza also sits on the board of the Jewish National Fund (JNF). The JNF isn't just any organization - it's actually the biggest group building settlements in Palestine and has played a key role in preventing Palestinian refugees from returning to their homes, despite UN Resolution 194 saying they have that right. Looking at who signed the society's founding documents tells us more about its connections. One notable name is Irwin Stelzer, who was basically Rupert Murdoch's close associate. This explains why Murdoch's newspapers, like The Sun and The Times, often publish articles by Henry Jackson Society members - articles that often show clear anti-Muslim bias. The Hertog Foundation funds the Henry Jackson Society, but they're also big supporters of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. The same foundation puts money into Friends of the IDF and the Middle East Forum.
Florence Bergeaud-Blackler is a known Islamophobe and a charlatan who is presented as a serious academic researcher when her work is just cheap polemics and exaggeration of the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence. She received criticism from many researchers concerning the quality of her work.
Muslim Brotherhood doesn’t call to Islamize the world that’s a clear cut lie. It primary focus is on promoting Islamic values and interests within Muslim communities. In the UK, for example, “Muslim Brotherhood dominated” Muslim Association of Britain (MAB), rejects violence and participates in activism and local elections. They actually support social integration and encourage young people to be active and responsible citizens.
“We see the results of this in European streets where there have been Islamist protests in countries like the Netherlands or Germany, calling for the establishment an Islamic caliphates across Europe.” It’s worth noting that these protests are organized by members of Hizbu Tahrir, an international Salafist group that advocates for establishing a caliphate in the Muslim world. It’s a fringe organization among the Muslim communities globally.
"Sharia Patrols" were made up of a small group of unemployed Salafists connected to the banned organization Al-Muhajiroun. The so-called Sharia Patrols were harassing mainly Muslims in East London. The East London Mosque also publicly condemned the patrols and Metropolitan police arrested many of its members, The group was effectively shut down and no longer existed after 2014.
The Southport murderer was born in Wales, UK, and suffered from mental illness. He came from a Christian family originally from Rwanda. There is no evidence to suggest that he was Muslim or that he carried out the attacks in the name of Islam. The UK government has authorized two additional charges against him.
“Even if we leave aside the calls to ‘submit or kill the non-believers’ - which have been taken to heart by radicals and terrorists, the Koran is hardly a call for integration.” - This is clearly a misleading statement. Salafist terrorist groups like AQ and ISIL mostly justify their terrorism by citing Western military interventions in MENA region. If you read their materials which I bet you didn’t, they base their violence on political reasons not religious reasons, and they often refer to the works of figures like Mohammed Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, Sayyid Qutb, and the Khawarij sect, known for its extreme beliefs. Even when these groups quote the Qur’an, they do so out of context to fit their agenda. Major Muslim leaders, scholars, and numerous Islamic councils around the world have strongly condemned Salafi jihadism, calling it a deviant and unacceptable interpretation of Islam.
To say that the Qur’an hardly calls for integration is simply not true. The Qur’an encourages Muslims to engage positively with others and highlights values that support peaceful coexistence and mutual respect. Here are some examples: Chapters 60:8, 49:13, 5:8, and 2:256. You mentioned Singapore as an example of successful Muslim coexistence, but I’m surprised you didn’t mention American Muslims. They are one of the most well-integrated Muslim communities in the West. Many American Muslims are part of the middle class and actively participate in society and the democratic process.
1-No comment, I don’t talk that extensively about Salafism in this video.
2- Parallel societies are a feature of Islam, when Denmark tried to tackle them through its social engineering policies to tackle crime, low employment… It got called racist for breaking up communities. You do not get to have it both ways, saying that parallel societies are the consequence of poverty and complain when they get broken up to improve outcomes for living there.
3-The Halal economy, is a parallel economy by definition - it is about creating a class of products and services that is made mostly by and for muslims. Goes far beyond food products we, there is Islamic finance, there is ‘Modest fashion’. These elements differentiate muslims from non-muslims - and that is the goal. (See ‘Le Marche Halal’ by Florence Bergeaud Backler)
4- Muslim majority countries are banning hijabs, and shutting down muslim organisations as well. - I talk about the consequences of this in the 4th part of this video.
5- Yes, I am aware of their leanings, but is their poll methodologically sound? I would say yes, and their results are in line with other polls from credible institutions. The day were the UK censes agencies make similar polls, I will share them - until then, all I had access to was this imperfect data.
6- I read their criticism to make my own opinion, and they do the same thing as calling her ‘Islamophobic’ which is not a rebuttal of any of her arguments or body of work. Epistemological, these critics provide little to no value to the public debate.
7- "Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur'an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope." This is the motto of the Muslim Brotherhood. If this is not a call for an Islamic society
While (currently) non-violent, it is as multiple security studies have shown a destabilizing force and increases the rift between Muslims and non-Muslims.
8- Protests that are good illustration if not entirely a reflection of the political opinions of Muslims in Europe as seen by the 3 surveys I shared.
9-The evidence against him - that he has an Al-Qaeda manual on his laptop, and the highly suggestive fact that every single court sketch of him has him hiding his face (and potential facial hair features?)
10- Again, the Quran is ambiguous and ambivalent (as I mention in the video), you can take any call for integration and match it up with a call for tolerance (I am not going to get into the debate on whether these are Mecca or Medina Sourats, and the context in which they were written). - You can decide that you want to engage with only the positive ones, fine, but that is not a reflection of reality.
The fact is these calls for secession and difference are the ones being shared by mosques (many Salafi Imams in Europe) and TikTok imams. And reflected in the behaviour of Muslims in selecting friends as demonstrated by the academic studies mentioned in this video.
11- Muslims in the US represent less than 1% of the population - in a more religious society, which previously had a highly selective immigration procedure under which its Muslims came. And the country is about to implement a second muslim immigration ban under the new Trump presidency. I doubt such a policy approach would be contested by Europe’s far right leaders
Hopefully, this clarifies a few things. 😊 And thank you for allowing me to flex my keyboard!
Cheers,
Hugo
You’re welcome, Keyboard warrior! Just kidding,
“Parallel societies are a feature of Islam”. This is simply not true. Islam does not explicitly advocate for separation, there’s no evidence of that. Again, similar socio-economic patterns of community clustering can be seen in various ethnic and religious immigrant groups around the world. Denmark’s anti-ghetto policies faced criticism from organizations like the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights and Amnesty International for potential discrimination and the exclusion of community voices during the process. No one criticised them for tackling poverty and crime. This social policy has never been done before in Denmark and we need to wait for the future to see its full results.
“The Halal economy, is a parallel economy by definition“. Again this is false. The Halal economy operates within existing European economic structures and markets. It creates jobs and generates tax revenue for the local government. It doesn't create a separate, parallel system because Halal products and services are already being integrated into mainstream markets, alongside non-Halal offerings like in Belgium and the UK. Florence Bergeaud-Blackler`s book, Le Marché Halal, has been met with criticism for exaggerating the implications and framing the halal market as divisive lol, which is not supported by any evidence.
“these critics provide little to no value to the public debate”. Well, I’m not sure about that. The Islamophobia Industry: How the Right Manufactures Fear of Muslims (2012) by Nathan Lean critiques Bergeaud-Blackler's work. The Oxford Handbook of European Islam (2014) by Jocelyne Cesari who criticised Bergeaud-Blackler's simplistic approach. Even Lorenzo Vidino who’s known for his UAE funding and for writing extensively against the MB presence in Europe, questioned Bergeaud-Blackler's methodology.
“This is the motto of the Muslim Brotherhood. If this is not a call for an Islamic society”. Again, based on that motto where does it call for the Islamization of Europe and the world? None. That motto was used during the early days of the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1930s during the British colonial rule of Egypt and its aftermath, context is important here. Since the 1980s, their motto was changed and their activities was also changed towards social and educational activities.
“Muslim majority countries are banning hijabs, and shutting down Muslim organisations as well”. No, they are not lol. There are 49 Muslim-majority countries, only 2 countries banned wearing hijabs in public and 5 countries banned wearing Burqa in public citing security reasons which is understandable. MB-affiliated organizations are the only organizations that are being shut down mainly in the Gulf countries, because they view them as a threat to their authoritarian regimes.
“The day were the UK censes agencies make similar polls, I will share them”. I completely agree.
“Highly suggestive fact that every single court sketch of him has him hiding his face (and potential facial hair features?)” Even if he had facial features that is still not evidence that he is a Muslim and carried the attacks in the name of Islam. The investigation is still ongoing, we will have to wait and see.
“but that is not a reflection of reality”. Well, that claim definitely has no basis in reality. As I said, Salafist terrorist groups justify their attacks based on political grounds backed by modern jihadist literature. I advise you to read the works by Charles R. Lister, Hassan Hassan and Michael Weiss.
“calls for secession and difference are the ones being shared by mosques (many Salafi Imams in Europe) and TikTok imams.” Nobody is disputing with you on that, Salafists are known to be an exclusionary group like I said before.
@ I have to say, I'm extremely impressed with how you have demonstrated your argument in a precise, thoughtful and professional manner. With regards to what you have stated, I would have to say that I agree with every point you have made and there is no denying that this video is portraying a certain narrative that is coming across as one-sided unfortunately. Overall, I would like to say, both of your responses are some of the best comments I have ever stumbled across concerning this debate. Thank you for your unbiased approach and accuracy, I very much appreciate it.
@@ArthurWilliams-k3o mashaallah
For peacfull coexistence of europeans and islam, the faith would need to secularize to some extend which, as we saw in the video, is not happening - quite the opposite in fact.
And the if we're really honest: everyone knows how this is going to end. Question is only if the europeans will accept their fate peacefully
Everyone Only Concerned about muslims But they are not concerned about Indians Coming from India😂
They don't tend to force their theological legal system onto the guest country.
Sorry what’s wrong with Indians?
Indians integrate well