How Google responds to U.S. search warrants, while working hard to protect our users' privacy and security. Learn more about how we handle requests: google.com/transparencyreport/...
Ььлдооос🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉ч😂😂😂😂дсдюж. Жвдбмвд жвдбммбддбвдбж🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉Вітаємо в буфері обміну Gboard. Скопійований текст зберігатиметься тут.Вітаємо в буфері обміну Gboard. Скопійований текст зберігатиметься туееее🎉а🎉 кп е🎉🎉(っ˘̩╭╮˘̩)っт.ттььб. 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 природного 🎉🎉🎉🎉каеееа🎉. 🎉🎉🎉епе🎉 на🎉кп🎉е🎉🎉😮
I'm sure there are powerful enough authority and systems out there that could skip this process without anyone ever knowing if they want to. But thanks for the cute animations to create that sense of security, even if it's fake.
Its nice to see that you are being a little more transparent about your processes in a human friendly way, and that you've provided a link out for more detailed information. Can't say this for every major corp out there. Thanks ;)
This all SOUNDS great... but if you notice, there was quite a frequent use of the word, "if". Like, if it looks like the data is being requested by the other guys, or if the warrant looks too vague, etc. That means Google may refuse or refine a warrant 60% of the time based on how it looks, or not give a damn and refuse or refine it 0.0000001% of the time. This all would still, technically, be true.
The "if" could just mean that most of the time warrants are issued correctly and appropriately. I would hope that is 99% of the time. I think you are reading too much into the "if".
Hmm... Google, how come this video was originally uploaded in 2014, but your logo changed in the video since the last time I saw. Both the "G" and the "Google" logo were not used in 2014. I also noticed some other things that were changed. You changing the video on w/o letting us know? Shouldn't that be re-uploaded w/ a new date?
*Google* has put up a video detailing how it works on User Data requests from Government agencies. Its fun and informative, not necessarily in that order. This is the meaning of being "transparent".
Okay, that's how you serve a warrant in the USA, but what about if law enforcement in another country wants data generated from a user account based in the USA?
Then they will probably have to go through the US government. So basically the same process, but will probably only happen if we have a extradition law with that country requesting it.
Shout out to google for actually telling people how it is that they complete a process instead of keeping it to themselves. At least they tell you if your data is being used against you.
I don't get people who are STILL complaining about how Google "cooperates with the law" what do you want them to do, run an illegal company just so you don't have to worry about a potential search warrant? (You shouldn't worry if you haven't done anything)
Because it's "the law" doesn't mean that you have to cooperate (cf: world history : nazism, slavery were both allowed by the law). "You shouldn't worry if you haven't done anything" : I agree with you but it seems that the NSA doesn't make that distinction. Same for the US customs. Sorry but U.S is using the same tools as Dictatorship... Sad.
pilotex2011 still does not mean that Google should be breaking the law. They are doing their best to stop this from happening. May be you should sign their petition to help.
Look all i'm trying to say is, stop complaining about how Google follows the law. They protect their users as best as possible but they can't break the law for us.
Val Kukatov I understand your point, but on the other side, they break citizens rights. But whether your point of view or mine, people who are threat to the US wins by forcing the US to act this way don't you think ? US should show those people that they are not afraid.
Nice job clearly articulating what you do. Your lawful help in issues like child safety, protection of victims, capturing of violent criminals, prevention of crime and in making it harder for hostile powers and terrorists to take advantage of us all are very important and good.
If I'm ever hunted by the FBI I'll at least be happy knowing their is a well animated video explaining how they're going to undercover my search history.
; ) Shh.. they were counting on the bulk of the public assuming it's the same thing that's been in the news for months so the bulk can go back to assuming anything else is just a tinfoil-laced conspiracy theory. Shocked to see how many people are satisfied with this and went right back to that kind of thinking as easily as this spoonfeeding attempt to obscure the actual problem. I thought we already knew they generally bowed down to search warrants.
Since Google's obligation is ultimately to the corporation and the stockholder and not necessarily the user, but also since Google has the motto of not being evil, has it ever considered appointing a party to act as a sort of guardian ad litem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_guardian) to protect the privacy interests of the user? Just thinking aloud here... nice video.
Did anyone else catch the massive qualifier at the beginning---- "excessive" requests----? So most of the time, they just give the information out freely?
What happens when the law enforcement agency that wants all the information on a user doesn't respond with a conveniently accommodating "that'll do" when asked to settle for part of it?
I am glad that you guys produced this leasson, there's trust on your intentions, and this can estimele us to think in smarter ways so solve some bugs that exists in this algorithm.
Alexander Rolli Its not as if KurdtStoo needs to say anything since many ISPs and search engine sites were outed for their involvement with the NSA recently. This is a poor attempt to save face when the evidence clearly supports the alternative hypothesis.
CravenTHC The NSA doesn't need Google's willingness/compliance to get data. They tap the data before it gets to Google and store what they can't decrypt. People need to wake up and realize that Google is on our side.
When they are. You're right about the NSA intercepting certain types of data, but they also performed warrant-less searches, some of which were not challenged. AT&T, Yahoo, and Google were a few of the names mentioned for having complied with warrant-less searches. Specifics were not mentioned, but you really shouldn't sit there and act like these companies are completely innocent.
How about the question, "How does google deal with a National Security Letter"? How about the question, "What was accessed by the NSA's tap into the unencrypted internal private network between Google services"? Lastly, how many users were tracked on the internet using Googles' prefs cookie, because Google didn't serve it as a secure cookie?
LMAO at the part where the judge carefully reviews the request. Also, if the NSA or FBI requests the info, as far as I know they pay google and have open access, no search warrant needed. If you want your private info private, don't use google services.
Levi Dettwyler With some patronising overtones, ideally. And explain it very quickly in case I get bored. Also, don't forget the jokes: Important stuff can be fun too!
So is this standard procedure for every user or Only Users in U.S? Also is every User notified when authorities ask for their data? What can a User do in that situation? if User deletes the data, i suppose Google still has a copy of it.
The police are after murderers, tax evaders, extortioners, assaulters, rapers. Google is just trying to make $$$. It's good that the police have a way to solve crime. When you are victimised by someone, you'll be happy to know there is a party (i.e. the Police) there to help you, because Google won't care.
So "my e-mail" is actually *google's property* which I access using an account. Or am i just understanding this wrong (since no one reads user agreements and the answer is probably in there).
I applaud Google if these types of precautions are always taken. Kudos! I talk about philosophical and societal issues and topics that help us grow as human beings. All I want is for us to embrace our humanity and our reality for all of its truths--the good and the bad. This life is a gift.. death is a promise: so let us constantly overcome ourselves to be something more. If you find me genuine, bring me your knowledge and life experiences so that we may both grow. That is all, no more no less. Good day to everyone:)
I love Google for fun yet informative adverts, searches and great platforms for content like RUclips. This is one of the reasons that they are so popular, while every thing is white and seemingly dull, they are very fun and cool =D
Наука
You don't see Facebook trying to explain this type of stuff to its users.
That's because Facebook hands user info out like it's no big deal.
I loved this!
I understand this a lot more now because of where I work.
This was an excellent and cute way to break it down
Scotty same
Well at least they have the decency to not pretend they do all the stuff Google says they do themselves
You can't help but trust sentient wooden dolls.
BinkieMcFartnuggets as the+8axizi u
BinkieMcFartnuggets you
I see you everywhere, Binkie.
Fry
lol
At 3:18 how is there the new Google logo, when it was released in September 2015, but this video came out in May 2014?
+Jesal Gandhi They probably added the new logo and re-uploaded the video, super users the ability to do that
Almost forgot that they're the OP of the internet pretty much.
Kevin Le Gfhqjhwhjwu1yqtqg w qay.swa ve tg 58ui⛼🗽🎠💒💒🏩🕍💒🌁🕍🕍🌄🌌fyyyuyh2h !bhbhb vvv
Bir ¡》》》¤¤¤¤□●●□●●●▪¤□♤♤>>🌌🎠🗼🕍🏫🏪🕍 bu 🌁🀄 rfgftfr0rrrr45yü
Kevin Le 5 a5
At 0:13 The logo is there too
2:03 - "Yeah, that'll do" that is totally something the FBI would say in that case.
AlmightyJesus
ExtraFuntime
ExtraFuntime co dai 8 tuoi
.
how can I transfer my apps to my SD card
Buddy Lasater dzjhjkh
I misread this and thought the title was "Way of a Walmart"
Jon Nat same
so did i
Jon Nat same
😹😂👌🔥💯
Jon Nat same
I just wish all the terms and conditions were explained in this format! Cool video! Nice job!
Probably the most entertaining (and informative) legal process video you've ever seen.
Stephen Holder 5th
Ььлдооос🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉ч😂😂😂😂дсдюж. Жвдбмвд жвдбммбддбвдбж🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉Вітаємо в буфері обміну Gboard. Скопійований текст зберігатиметься тут.Вітаємо в буфері обміну Gboard. Скопійований текст зберігатиметься туееее🎉а🎉 кп е🎉🎉(っ˘̩╭╮˘̩)っт.ттььб. 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 природного 🎉🎉🎉🎉каеееа🎉. 🎉🎉🎉епе🎉 на🎉кп🎉е🎉🎉😮
@@nicholsfamily0416123
Kickstarter: 'Way of a Warrant' Board Game
Dude I want this
I'm sure there are powerful enough authority and systems out there that could skip this process without anyone ever knowing if they want to. But thanks for the cute animations to create that sense of security, even if it's fake.
I don't understand anything they're saying, but I like watching the little people walk around😊
Its nice to see that you are being a little more transparent about your processes in a human friendly way, and that you've provided a link out for more detailed information. Can't say this for every major corp out there. Thanks ;)
how have the times changed
0:47 @@ghajik.
I thought I saw Dora getting arrested by some random agent or spy on the thumbnail
This is a really great explanation of how Google deals with search warrant. A lot of effort goes into protecting the users privacy!
Haha I love how "The Other Guys" ever so sliiiiightly looks like a Facebook jab.
This all SOUNDS great... but if you notice, there was quite a frequent use of the word, "if". Like, if it looks like the data is being requested by the other guys, or if the warrant looks too vague, etc. That means Google may refuse or refine a warrant 60% of the time based on how it looks, or not give a damn and refuse or refine it 0.0000001% of the time. This all would still, technically, be true.
The "if" could just mean that most of the time warrants are issued correctly and appropriately. I would hope that is 99% of the time. I think you are reading too much into the "if".
Arm4g3dd0nX ٢٥ض٢٣٥ق٢ث٤٢٤
2:36 This man goes all the way around the world to go to a place that was walking distance
Google perfectly stated their policies in the video and this proves that they are so specific in securing the user's privacy/data
Seems legit. I trust you now, Google.
U tube video bad videos wars Kells.
Genocide videos
@@nikitaspratt5736 Shut up.
de @@nikitaspratt5736s
When the impostor is sus! 😳
Im glad Google is stepping up to show users EXACTLY how their data is being given over to investigators. Job well done.
Hmm... Google, how come this video was originally uploaded in 2014, but your logo changed in the video since the last time I saw. Both the "G" and the "Google" logo were not used in 2014. I also noticed some other things that were changed. You changing the video on w/o letting us know? Shouldn't that be re-uploaded w/ a new date?
Mark Jorgensen t Highbury
Very nice! I am a bit curious how this applies to non us citizens?
OMG "whys the cow here" "nice mustace" nice google
*Google* has put up a video detailing how it works on User Data requests from Government agencies. Its fun and informative, not necessarily in that order.
This is the meaning of being "transparent".
Okay, that's how you serve a warrant in the USA, but what about if law enforcement in another country wants data generated from a user account based in the USA?
Then they will probably have to go through the US government. So basically the same process, but will probably only happen if we have a extradition law with that country requesting it.
blackturtleshow hair
blackturtleshow u:
blackturtleshow 💇
x cu : type
1:48 my google home actually turned on in this part
This is all fine and dandy, unless it comes from the FISA, then the user will never know and Google can't deny it or narrow it down.
"Whats that cow doing here?" .... "Nice Mustache"
Shout out to google for actually telling people how it is that they complete a process instead of keeping it to themselves. At least they tell you if your data is being used against you.
I love how Google has a sense of humor, but can still be serious. I love Google.
Hey
Aero 8
Love me
I don't get people who are STILL complaining about how Google "cooperates with the law" what do you want them to do, run an illegal company just so you don't have to worry about a potential search warrant? (You shouldn't worry if you haven't done anything)
Because it's "the law" doesn't mean that you have to cooperate (cf: world history : nazism, slavery were both allowed by the law).
"You shouldn't worry if you haven't done anything" : I agree with you but it seems that the NSA doesn't make that distinction. Same for the US customs.
Sorry but U.S is using the same tools as Dictatorship... Sad.
pilotex2011 still does not mean that Google should be breaking the law. They are doing their best to stop this from happening. May be you should sign their petition to help.
Look all i'm trying to say is, stop complaining about how Google follows the law. They protect their users as best as possible but they can't break the law for us.
Nick Orie Who asked them to break what law exactly?
Val Kukatov I understand your point, but on the other side, they break citizens rights. But whether your point of view or mine, people who are threat to the US wins by forcing the US to act this way don't you think ? US should show those people that they are not afraid.
this would be a great education video for schools
je me
demande
Shorouk
Eddie Jones ejjhgh
Eddie Jo..nl
3:01 Hey, that's ME!!!!!! I'm famous!!!!
This video is helpful for our clients in understanding how the police or State can access your electronic information from Google through a warrant.
Q
BUT are there any loopholes via an app & permissions that could be exploited?
This is a hidden treasure i just found thank you google, i appreciate all the hard work was made
Nice job clearly articulating what you do. Your lawful help in issues like child safety, protection of victims, capturing of violent criminals, prevention of crime and in making it harder for hostile powers and terrorists to take advantage of us all are very important and good.
thanks for making this stuff into a kids show. We know you are benevolent, innocent and good spirited now
It’s a way to dumb it down and make it interesting google style, you understood didn’t you?
If I'm ever hunted by the FBI I'll at least be happy knowing their is a well animated video explaining how they're going to undercover my search history.
best april fools google prank.
Finally, Google explain about their warrant.
Well so something issue or involve about the warrants .. ohh yes!! I'm sure very nice too!!👍☺
This is how you respond to a search warrant. How do you respond to Patriot Act requests?
; )
Shh.. they were counting on the bulk of the public assuming it's the same thing that's been in the news for months so the bulk can go back to assuming anything else is just a tinfoil-laced conspiracy theory. Shocked to see how many people are satisfied with this and went right back to that kind of thinking as easily as this spoonfeeding attempt to obscure the actual problem. I thought we already knew they generally bowed down to search warrants.
I agree. Packaging the whole thing in this "cute and playful" manner is insulting as well, but people buy it!
+Gordon Tendick this whole thread is so painfully true xP
Gordon Tendick =\ zz cf tt fee222 w questions_211_1 si Suu c ah zip u 0 for .
Heywood Yabloome 78th irkeirjkk3k4kj4
The cow was the best part of the whole video, and I loved the little people :)
Since Google's obligation is ultimately to the corporation and the stockholder and not necessarily the user, but also since Google has the motto of not being evil, has it ever considered appointing a party to act as a sort of guardian ad litem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_guardian) to protect the privacy interests of the user? Just thinking aloud here... nice video.
Did anyone else catch the massive qualifier at the beginning---- "excessive" requests----?
So most of the time, they just give the information out freely?
Josh Fwlori
ok i am not in the us what will you do ?
This is interesting and educational. Nice to know Google respects the private information we have, and will only give it out in the most careful way.
What happens when the law enforcement agency that wants all the information on a user doesn't respond with a conveniently accommodating "that'll do" when asked to settle for part of it?
I love how this was presented
Pi
... Jj..
8kk?
.. Jbnn
M. 8in jjb. R tb!..
Yt.
The. I9c.. N b no9. In89
@@malik123yaadna na
@@malik123yaad hggugguggggugugfhhuughhugggugugghgguguguggugggugfggggcgfgfg
I like how you did the video, very informative.
I am glad that you guys produced this leasson, there's trust on your intentions, and this can estimele us to think in smarter ways so solve some bugs that exists in this algorithm.
This was awesome and informative!
Is there any hope of stopping the NSA?
Yes, I've messaged you twice already but they keep deleting it. So I'll tell you again.. hold somebody is knocking on the door brb
***** I went back actually checked my messages at first. That's funny part LOL
Woah! This bullshit you're feeding us sure looks delicious! Thank you Google!
They are saying more than you are.
Alexander Rolli Its not as if KurdtStoo needs to say anything since many ISPs and search engine sites were outed for their involvement with the NSA recently. This is a poor attempt to save face when the evidence clearly supports the alternative hypothesis.
CravenTHC The NSA doesn't need Google's willingness/compliance to get data. They tap the data before it gets to Google and store what they can't decrypt.
People need to wake up and realize that Google is on our side.
When they are.
You're right about the NSA intercepting certain types of data, but they also performed warrant-less searches, some of which were not challenged. AT&T, Yahoo, and Google were a few of the names mentioned for having complied with warrant-less searches. Specifics were not mentioned, but you really shouldn't sit there and act like these companies are completely innocent.
No they aren't all innocent,, but it's hard to resist the weight of the government and "patriotic duty"
They have to comply and are gagged.
Hahaha when the producer had to go court and authenticate and went blah blah blah!! That was so funny! Oh, plus, the summary and the cow, lol!
Awesome Video, even for a topic as serious as this.
Though it would be nice to know what happens to foreign requests.
Lopalto
How about the question, "How does google deal with a National Security Letter"?
How about the question, "What was accessed by the NSA's tap into the unencrypted internal private network between Google services"?
Lastly, how many users were tracked on the internet using Googles' prefs cookie, because Google didn't serve it as a secure cookie?
Difjfivrntb%Mr
Rmkrhrjk
Bfkrjrrjkrl
And we can thank for all of this to Edward Snowden, not Google.
This is the process they had in place before people even knew Snowden's name.
Peter Sitterly abb
Nk
Cea mai tare din parcare
This has to be a real board game :)
Thanks for explaining this in layman's terms. Every company should do this,
Well so dosen't google "notify" the users?
+Mreverything11 but it says that in the video...
LMAO at the part where the judge carefully reviews the request. Also, if the NSA or FBI requests the info, as far as I know they pay google and have open access, no search warrant needed. If you want your private info private, don't use google services.
If you want your private info private, don't use the internet... or technology at all just to be safe.
This is actually a pretty well-presented explanation.
If you listen to a bird as it goes over Wal-Mart the way of it is cheep-cheep!
I came here to know if you have stolen my data
Interested how this will work internationally... as Google has an international userbase...
lactobacillusprime x"iu >,&&
lactobacillusprime
How do you protect my data, during transmission? For example, when the NSA makes broad provider data collection.
Thanks for the video. I thought it was very good and like the character props.
Imagine believing that they do anything to "narrow the scope" and don't just give the authorities literally everything they asked for. Lmao
That video is awesome !!
I love how you guys make boring stuff like this interesting. For me, at least.
Does the user get notified whenever an information request is accepted, and sent? Or is it only in some specific cases?
Thanks for clearing this up.
Nukeclears and
So
What is NSA I believed you Google a hundred percent I love story picture books they're my favorite kind!!!
Hey Google, how do you respond to search warrants? Please explain to me as though I was a child using toys and stuff.
Levi Dettwyler With some patronising overtones, ideally. And explain it very quickly in case I get bored. Also, don't forget the jokes: Important stuff can be fun too!
Namaste.
Thanks for your Appreciation and meaningful information about security about Google Account.
Dhanyavaad.
I find the inclusion of the Chrome icon in this video curious, what information regarding Chrome usage does Google keep?
Blog post too: googleblog.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/transparency-report-requests-for-user.html
its nice to see googles humour
That was a really nice way to put all that info.
So is this standard procedure for every user or Only Users in U.S?
Also is every User notified when authorities ask for their data? What can a User do in that situation? if User deletes the data, i suppose Google still has a copy of it.
sure.. that's what they do
"Everything is done accurately," he says while the puppet just hits random buttons on a machine.
+MrDontAsk3 True.
Now I want one of those cow figurines!
cool story bro. now what about meta data?
You are asking too many questions username LordStickMax. We will be in contact soon username LordStickMax.
Lackson Banda
Good to know that Google doesn't just "bow down" to the Government.
The police are after murderers, tax evaders, extortioners, assaulters, rapers. Google is just trying to make $$$. It's good that the police have a way to solve crime. When you are victimised by someone, you'll be happy to know there is a party (i.e. the Police) there to help you, because Google won't care.
So "my e-mail" is actually *google's property* which I access using an account.
Or am i just understanding this wrong (since no one reads user agreements and the answer is probably in there).
The cow at the end was so cute!
Nice Mustache.
I dont have a problem with google or police seeing my data.
Veiko Heiberg
I wonder what 3d printer they printed the parts on.
how is this video only in 720p wtf google I don't get it
I applaud Google if these types of precautions are always taken. Kudos!
I talk about philosophical and societal issues and topics that help us grow as human beings. All I want is for us to embrace our humanity and our reality for all of its truths--the good and the bad. This life is a gift.. death is a promise: so let us constantly overcome ourselves to be something more. If you find me genuine, bring me your knowledge and life experiences so that we may both grow. That is all, no more no less. Good day to everyone:)
ofSix jh hi call
ofSix y
Stanbulu gelin
Thanks .!!!
Anyone else binge-watching company videos at 3AM?
and if someone dies? The police or relatives can have complete access to the account of the deceased user?
unless its the nsa...
No
Nice and informative. Also entertaining
Great Clip Thanks Google.This makes my job so much easier ...well presented, my favorite clip.
I love Google for fun yet informative adverts, searches and great platforms for content like RUclips. This is one of the reasons that they are so popular, while every thing is white and seemingly dull, they are very fun and cool =D
Why are people afraid that the government is going to search their account unless you did something bad?
nudes of themselves they have sent to their lovers... duh!
4th amendment
We're not afraid, we just don't like people talking behind our backs.
because the NSA gathers everyone's data illegally, without getting a proper warrant or asking google
Build a house with glass walls, including these of your toilet, because you have nothing to hide. :)
I want that Google button