Supermassive black holes make up the difference they were looking for. Mutual attraction doesn't explain why galaxies stay together, gazillion stellar mass black hole makes the math work.
"while we cannot see it we sure do notice it's influence" is pretty much a tautology given that the only reason we think that there's dark matter is because something is influencing the universe in ways we don't understand.
You're right. But, I don't think she was trying to state a groundbreaking proposition. I think she was just giving the definitions. She could have made that more clear.
@@tickmanipulatorshe did a pretty good job making it clear, she said exactly what it was in a simple easy to understand way without muddying the understanding of what it is at the fundamental level with unnecessary specifications, just the foundation of what it actually is
Please explain how that is a tautology? She is saying we cannot see the matter that we now call dark matter, but we can see the effects of whatever it is. Just like the discovery of Neptune which was accomplished based on mathematical calculations of its predicted position due to observed perturbations in the orbit of the planet Uranus. Astronomers saw the influence of Neptune before seeing the planet itself.
@@anatolytsinker5317 Just because dark matter hasn't been detected yet doesn't mean it won't ever be detected in the future. If dark matter is detectable, and I'm not saying it definitely will be, it is possible the technology to detect it hasn't been developed yet. Cancer causing ionizing radiation has been a threat to life on earth for millions and millions of years, and was invisible. It was only first detected in 1890.
I'm still convinced we don't fully understand gravity. Dark matter isn't noticeable except for at galactic scales. Gravity was thought of as a force until Einstein, and now people are trying to quantify it as a particle. I think Einstein is correct and we don't fully understand how the higgs field works in the universe to warp the fabric of space time
As theoretical physicist and RUclips content creator Angela Collier says; "dark matter" is not a theory, it's a grouping of multiple different observations. Observations that could be the result of a single cause or many causes, that may or may not be interrelated, and that may or may not involve new fundamental particle(s). From what I understand there are odd observations like gravitational lensing occurring where there is seemingly no or at least not correspondent normal matter to warp space-time to cause the aberrant gravitational lensing that has been observed. This means a "simple" explanation like General Relativity being wrong or incomplete, as a means to resolve the inconsistencies of our observations with our current theories, is not enough, and there must be further complexities involved. Angela has a great video on her RUclips channel explaining everything in detail. I recommend checking it out.
I am sure fast moving charged particles flying away from each other didn't cause massive coherent magnetic and electric fields that structure the universe into a web or anything. It is just dark matter or something. I am glad we have theoretical physicists.
The way I understand it is that the term dark matter is just a placeholder until they figure out what's going on. The stars in the galaxies should be flying apart but something is holding them together. It can't really be the super massive black hole in the center because it's too far away from the outer edges. Don't be too hard on me because I'm aware that I could be completely wrong.
@tims8603 That is the basic understanding correct. I am suggesting the plasma cosmology theories are more correct. That as the big bang happened you had huge pockets of charged matter moving near speed of light which formed very strong electromagnetic fields that are coherent. The idea of dark matter comes from considering only gravity, based on the idea electromagnetism won't be coherent. But that assumes the big bang had already happened and all the scattered dust had gravity as main force acting on it because there would be no coherent EM fields. When you look at the pictures of the universe, all the galaxies connect up and it has been determined they have coherent Birkland current ropes that wrap around them. The problem is they don't take into account the initial conditions, and just pretend everything is everywhere randomly. The math won't work tho, so they invent 97% of all matter and 99% of energy and just assume that must be something in order to explain why there is structure. Every major physicist today bought into dark matter/energy and they are too proud to say they might have goofed. It took a couple years for them to admit the image of the black hole they claimed to have was a rounding error in the code used to process the data. 90% of people who heard that story still never found out it was actually just a goof.
General relativity is ok from this perspective no problems there “Dark energy & matter (which is also all energy @ the atomic level) is incorrectly named” It exists and if our perspective was beyond the event horizon then earth’s perspective would be this dark energy simple as that once we achieve a4D gravitational mapping system then it will become so obvious to everyone! Gravitational lensing is what is hiding all the mass of energy’s because it is warped outside of our visual spectrum kind of like a combination of mirrors & mirages! The “Big Bang” is an incorrect theory JWT shows signs of this but gravitational mapping will prove the the folding space and time is infinite mixing of the multiverse beyond our event horizons and that is better explained as a multiverse of perspectives ! Black hole is also a wormhole combined with a spin axis that is spewing out and is like our expanding universe but each worm hole or spin axis of a black hole is outside of our visual spectrum therefore beyond our event horizon gravitational lensing is a clue to show us some cause and effect of event horizons that are toying with our visual spectrum this so simple to conceive of being the norm everywhere! It is not complicated once you realize it! I’m not good at math and I have issues with all CULTural ideals having such obviously oppressive controls over our earthly existence even scientists have been wrong all to often so the knowledge of science is in need of a makeover! The AI SINGULARITY is the big kicker! My spiritual being is the proof that tells me the creation of everything is the infinite singularity & no singularity we think we can create can ever compete but our greatest comparison to the singularity is that we all love to entertain & be entertained! All our brain wants is acquiring more knowledge stimulations our spiritual being is way more beyond all earthly CULTures! Creation itself is the infinite singularity’s entertainment! Icons pop “I don’t care, I love it” contradiction is good for our souls! Just be careful who you congregate with! 😎👍💯🇨🇦🙏
General relativity is ok from this perspective no problems there “Dark energy & matter (which is also all energy @ the atomic level) is incorrectly named” It exists and if our perspective was beyond the event horizon then earth’s perspective would be this dark energy simple as that once we achieve a4D gravitational mapping system then it will become so obvious to everyone! Gravitational lensing is what is hiding all the mass of energy’s because it is warped outside of our visual spectrum kind of like a combination of mirrors & mirages! The “Big Bang” is an incorrect theory JWT shows signs of this but gravitational mapping will prove the the folding space and time is infinite mixing of the multiverse beyond our event horizons and that is better explained as a multiverse of perspectives ! Black hole is also a wormhole combined with a spin axis that is spewing out and is like our expanding universe but each worm hole or spin axis of a black hole is outside of our visual spectrum therefore beyond our event horizon gravitational lensing is a clue to show us some cause and effect of event horizons that are toying with our visual spectrum this so simple to conceive of being the norm everywhere! It is not complicated once you realize it! I’m not good at math and I have issues with all CULTural ideals having such obviously oppressive controls over our earthly existence even scientists have been wrong all to often so the knowledge of science is in need of a makeover! The AI SINGULARITY is the big kicker! My spiritual being is the proof that tells me the creation of everything is the infinite singularity & no singularity we think we can create can ever compete but our greatest comparison to the singularity is that we all love to entertain & be entertained! All our brain wants is acquiring more knowledge stimulations our spiritual being is way more beyond all earthly CULTures! Creation itself is the infinite singularity’s entertainment! Icons pop “I don’t care, I love it” contradiction is good for our souls! Just be careful who you congregate with! 😎👍💯🇨🇦🙏
The word "dark matter" doesn't exactly describe it. Dark gravity describes it better. One thing we know is that it doesn't stop light from going through it like a black hole.
It's a place holder term for some thing that either can't currently be observed or it's something that has eluded most current equations - I vote the later which is why I hate the terms Dar Matter and Dark Energy, they seem kind of ignorant.
I'm not sure if you're with or against the conversation. But they have absolutely done the math using these observations to determine that baryonic matter only adds up to 5% of the totality of the universe. Just because we can't interact with dark matter, doesn't mean it isn't there. We've even observed the effects of it gravitationally, and it is also the only thing that can explain how galaxies spin the way they do at the speeds they do. As she said, just because we don't see it, we DO see it's influence. It would be like saying you don't believe in the air you breath to stay alive because you can't see the individual oxygen and nitrogen atoms. We do in fact, have an extraordinary amount of evidence that it exists and must exist for the universe to work the way we observe it to.
@@Vazik05 Stop believing hypothesis' as fact. There are plenty of competing theories to explain these phenomenon's and none of them (including dark matter) seem complete but all potentially viable. Biggest problem with science today is these theorists speaking out about their theories as fact in order to sell them to the masses. Biggest disservice to physics since the dark ages as it closes people minds to alternative explanations that have yet to be found. Until you show me a jar of this dark matter I hold it right up there with the Easter bunny. If it makes up 95% of the universe it shouldn't be that hard to find a jar of it.
@@Vazik05 The ONLY thing that can explain it? So they pull some theory out their asses and go looking for something that fixes their problem, and when they can't find anything they give that no-evidence a name that implies it's matter??? Dark energy/matter is a bullshit theory. It will be dispelled, but meanwhile we'll keep doing actual science.
Russ, you know how sometimes you go swimming and your foot touches something underwater, you don't know what it is but you feel it? That's Dark Matter. It's there regardless of whether you know all the details about it because whatever it is, your foot touched it.
If scientists think of galaxies as Islands and space as the ocean, it makes more sense. Dark matter is the heft and mass of the island. Visible matter is the life that evolved on that island. Dark matter is the only medium where visible matter can exist or come from. I believe when the universe started to cool down the clumps of dark matter created the regions where visible light can form. And the reason it has more gravitational power is because it acts as a viscous field that keeps everything together.
@@dirtygrandpa-n2l Thank you. Scientists are now postulating that Dark Matter was there before the big bang and the inflation caused by the big bang created space allowing dark to separate into clumps and create the galaxies. I believe dark matter existed on its own and needed inflation to create time. If there was a singularity of dark matter and intrinsic pressure fluctuations that bottlenecked in it, it would eventually and suddenly bang.
If dark matter is that abundant, why can’t we feel it on this planet or even inside the solar system? Why solar system seems to follow newton’s laws without the need for dark matter?
First dark matter seems to be more effective at the very macroscopic. It keeps the galaxies from flying apart since there isn't enough normal matter to account for the gravity needed to contain the rotational speed. Second once you get to Mercury's orbit, Newton's laws fall apart. That was the whole reason why Einstein came up with general and special relativity, Mercury's orbit was off from what Newton's laws predicted. Newton's laws work great on the macroscopic level, but get close enough to massive objects general relativity takes over.
Not seeing it is one thing. But what gets me is that if it is there, shouldn't it filter out some of the light, or obscure some of it? Unless it is small black holes spread throughout the galaxy? Unless we all miss something very fundamental. For instance; you say that it must be dark (or unobserveable) *matter*. But who says that it must be matter?
The way we describe energy/matter when it comes to these unseen forces doesn't add up. When using the Schwarzschild metric for the observable universe, including dark matter/energy, the radius is somewhere ~3x the current observable universe' radius.
Is the stuff that we cannot see actually here? Or is our notion of gravity screwed up in some way? Maybe we are not moving the way it seems we are. So there is no missing mass.
Maybe "Matter" and "Energy" are two states of universe. We know a lot about matter side of it and energy that interacts with the matter. Like gravitation, electric, magnetic etc. But the vast other side of universe "Energyverse" which is not contained by space or time is inaccessible. Even "Meterialverse" is not fully revealed and understood by human quest. Just some random thoughts to connect to consciousness. Consciousness may be a manifestation of energy from energyverse injecting into meterialverse to understand meterialverse. We are all meterialnauts trying to figure out what is meterialverse send from energyverse.
Matter is a different state of ENERGY. Dark matter is something else entirely. Perhaps an alternate kind of energy coalesced into an alternate kind of matter. But probaly, "dark matter" is a long-range gravity field produced by a galaxy's central black hole and other ancient black holes which predate the Big Bang.
@ True. Observer which is mind collapses the wave function. Does that mean there could be a universal mind that collapsed the energy to create the meterialverse at some point called big bang? I think I’m crazy 🤪
Could a deeper understanding of dark matter and dark energy fundamentally challenge our current understanding of the Big Bang theory and its implications for the emergence of life on Earth?
You detect the existence of something, because of perception and the mathematics of the cosmos, but we have no idea on what it is that is influencing the universe around us...
It’s all an encapsulated dead body going through organic decomposition. The consciousness is now experiencing things from a much smaller scale, and perspective. 🎶 Ooh look what you made me do. 🎶
Someday we will discover that it’s really hideous monsters and ghouls looking down at our universe in a fish tank type display in a zoo or aquarium type setting
Interesting to find out in our galaxy dark matter is 5x more prevalent than white (normal) matter. But its more interesting to share why dark matter does not give off light -- its simply compressed space. This compressed space has a refractive index causing the bending of light to be confused with gravitational lensing -- its just optical lensing. The current researchers need to take a hard look at the Bullet Cluster and how a cloud of supposedly dark matter with a strong gravitational properties can separate from baryonic (normal) matter. The "Left hand does not match the right".
Dark matter is not matter.. its energy and when interacting with matter it creates gravity. Thats why I believe what surrounds the proton and nucleus of an atom is not an electron particle, it’s an energy field. When atoms create molecules and molecules create matter, the energy fields combined with dark matter create gravity. The density of matter creates an implied gravitational field and can distort space.
It's not exotic it's just an absence of such depth that it seems solid. She knows nothing more than the first primitive that looked up at the sky and noticed much of it is dark.
Supermassive black holes make up the difference they were looking for. Mutual attraction doesn't explain why galaxies stay together, gazillion stellar mass black hole makes the math work.
If dark matter were real, wouldn't we observe unpredictable stellar and/or galactic orbits? I mean we can observe orbits and make sense of their trajectories based on the gravitational effects and the combined center of gravity of the particular system under observation. But how can you make heads or tails out of system in gravitational equilibrium where only 20% of all matter contributing to its center of gravity can be accounted for?
Dark matter is concentrated space which is in the process of becoming matter eventually when it becomes a big bang! in essense it is thick space not yet concentrated enought to produce the first particles!
Humans are sight based animals. Thus we complain when something is not visible . Question is...what other energies and resonances could we detect from 'dark' matter ?
"Thus we complain when something is not visible" That's flat earth science. "Zetetics" is the argument that if you can't see it with your own eyes then it doesn't exist. You're in great company.
@@kitmoore9969 Flat earth science ignores any argument or evidence that would disprove it. They claimed the midnight sun doesn't happen on Antarctica. So several flat earthers and normals were invited to go to Antarctica to prove it once and for all. All paid for. Not a single flat earther took up the offer.
when we invert being 'sight based' does that mean we become faith-based. accepting our limitations of sight and science and living beyond it 'with Gods help'. hearing 'its icy be carefull' and dismissing it as a thought from self, then falling down and sliding because you refused to listen to an unknown thought.
It actually is much more propable that the physics theories are wrong and we missing or misunderstand something than the "dark matter" "dark energy" or "dark gravity" hypothesis.
I think dark matter is just a property of spacetime itself and only reveals its selfs more if there is a lot of it. At slow speeds/little space you dont account for special relativity but with high speeds/big spaces it comes into play, maybe something else is coming into play then...
If space is related to time, then it makes sense that matter has to be related to gravity, dark matter or standard photon reactive matter that is visible to humans. This means that there are so many ways tk sù7⁷⁷
I don’t think ‘strange’ is an apt word. I don’t think anything in the universe is strange. Maybe strange for us. But everything that is , is everything that could be. If it exists it’s because it could. Our ability to detect or interact with it or not has no bearing on anything. The universe is under no obligation to makes sense to us. If anything at all our lack of understanding only exposes our current limitations. With time we may gain new insights or maybe we never will, maybe it’s something we may never get to interact with just by the contrast of our natures.
If everything I mean, everything is expanding and accelerating at the same time then we would not know it, However, it would provide the appearance of gravity.
Dark matter is dilated mass. Dilation is the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". This doesn't mean mass increases, it means mass becomes spread throughout spacetime relative to an outside observer. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation. A graph illustrates its squared nature, it increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. It occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. This has been accepted for a long time. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. Sound familiar? This is the explanation for dark matter/galaxy rotation curves. The "missing mass" is dilated mass. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 ultra diffuse galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. In other words they have normal rotation rates.
This IS an interesting comment. I encourage you to write a paper on this topic; if you do not have the sufficient technical background seek a coauthor who does have the necessary credentials.
@SDH757 I kinda already have a coauthor, Einstein. He explained dark matter in 1939 - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." Wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, dilation will occur. This forbids astronomical concentrations of mass. Einstein repeatedly spoke about this. Nobody believed in singularities when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Dirac, Pauli, Feynman etc. for this reason. 99.8% of the mass in our solar system is in the sun. 99.9% of the mass in an atom is in the nucleus. This indicates 100's of trillions of solar masses at the center of common spiral galaxies. Due to dilation, the mass in our own galactic center exists in a "non local" state. In other words it's not just there, it's everywhere. Mass is a clingy thing thanks to gravity. It makes sense that it would exist as a halo.
@@SDH757 I made a video on the subject, over a thousand people agree with me so far. I tried to post on arXiv but I need a sponsor. I know it's just a matter of time before more people realize this. I am a big SR-71 fan too.
ALL SYSTEMS NEED CHECKED AND OVERHAULED THE OLD WAYS ARE OVER WE NEED TO PICK UP THE PIECES AND MOVE ON AND LEAVE ALL THE PEOPLE WHO CAN'T TELL THE TRUTH BEHIND
If our universe is collapsing in a black hole then wouldn't it make sense that all the dark matter surrounding us would be other matter that has also collapsed into the black hole and not be seen by us because we're too busy creating our own space within the black hole
Why can’t gravity leak into other dimensions. Dark matter would simply be the effect of gravity coming from matter into other dimensions. Spacetime deforming almost imply an additional dimension
As I understand it, higher dimensions are not a place. Something cannot "come from" another dimension. the 7 higher dimensions are knots of spacetime wrapped tightly together. That is obviously a gross oversimplification but you get the idea. It is entirely possible that those invisible dimensions have a direct effect on gravity in our visible 3 dimensional universe + time as the fourth.
crazy that they can’t just admit that we are completely wrong. I mean if my theory only had 5% of its mass explained and accounted for i’d be laughed at. We went so far down the wrong hole that the smartest people in the world are out here sounding like fools.
Scientists found out they were wrong in that. Now they are on it. That‘s the great thing about science. It is a system that can prove hypotheses right or wrong and proceed to find out the truth. Done countless times, work goes on.
@@HarryGuit you do realize they are still exploring the same theories and now believe in dark matter and energy more than they ever have? they haven’t moved on at all. Science is great, until morons start treating established science as gospel, like today, ideas outside the established science are treated like they are woo-woo. science hasn’t innovated anything, other than cosmetically, in the last 100 years. Don’t treat science as a religion and it works but when you do, you end up with the objectively asinine theories that cannot be proven ever, like today.
doesn't necessarily mean we are wrong about anything. Just that our current understanding is incomplete. This is what science is about. Taking what works and building on it. If we were wrong about everything you wouldn't have a cell phone. we wouldn't be putting satellites in orbit, or a million other advances.
It’s ok this all stems from the “Yet” part of this experience and what is being referred to as “dark matter “ isn’t really dark.. it’s just the fact that we are ignorant about it other than the fact that it exists and has a place in the fabric of the accumulation of the material that is being interpreted as the essence that is making up the universe and whatever it is that is currently possible for us to measure and understand, which we can all agree is because we are only able to observe less than one % of the visible light spectrum and we are a very low vibrational physical existence in our 3d-4D environment so we are just victims of circumstance and happenstance, given the fact that we have no control over the realm in which we are currently able to experience outside of a much larger and esoteric topic that isn’t something that has to be conversed at this point. But we are just limited in the way we are able to observe and measure and we are only just dipping a toe into the vastness of the information that is waiting to be seen and understood. Just like we have no way to explain why certain people with an ability to receive or access information they couldn’t possibly have or even have a way to get to said information can. And we are all just trying to understand what we can’t give a reason or example to help our counterparts to have proof or evidence that we have fruitful in the process that we are using to experience and document our findings in a scientific manner that is oh so important for the majority to except, and to be honest I don’t think that we are improving our understanding of what we are capable and how we are able to process and understand our data as we are able to see and interpret the information we 3d semiconscious beings that we are using the vailed senses that we are trying to understand and measure material data that is being perceived in one way and it’s unhindered and actual forms. It’s like trying to watch Avatar on nothing more than a flip book. Yeah I know that I can make the most out of the movie by the way I implement creativity and spontaneity to make the experience better but it’s not going to change the fact that it’s not the same as what we have given you watch it via video and it’s counterpart audio 😊 it’s just what we think we have and the way that we are able to perceive what is is completely different and we have nothing to lose from being patient and putting a pin in it and moving forward with the experiences that we are able to actually see or experience in a way that is able to be documented and we are able to interact with on some level of what we call the scientific method.
“Although we don’t see it, we sure see its influence” is not “the weird thing about dark matter.” It’s literally the definition of dark matter. What’s weird is that we observed an influence and assumed it’s caused by matter.
...or we may have to revisit how we define matter. New discoveries have a habit of forcing us to redefine our previous assumptions of nature with higher resolution.
Is there less matter in the Universe today? Obviously matter is being converted into energy every moment. We can only "see" the matter that's in the process of converting matter into energy. How much matter has stopped converting matter into energy and has gone dark? Is all of the mass of all the energy ever converted being included when calculating the mass of the universe? If so, how is the mass of a stream of visible photons being calculated going back 14+ billion years?
It's called the aether where all the sub -atom structures exist, your consciousness exists as sub-atomic structures in the aether. Your body is the sacrificial scaffolding to build your soul. If you have a good scaffolding, you will have a good soul, take care of you scaffolding.
It is amazing how some people believe in this stuff. I understand religions to some extend due to the cultural infusion of such beliefs, but the believe some charlatans who are there just to make a buck is pretty sad.
I don't understand why people are so baffled that a star is just a small portion of things in space. You mean it has to be so massive as to glow before it is important enough to count? Planets, moons, asteroids, and comets are all "Dark Matter". But there's more. Have you ever seen those old Volvo headlights that were massive but dim? A large but dim light puts out more light than a very bright pinpoint. Let me put it another way. If you made a chart of the imtensity of light coming from a star it would look like a bell curve not a spike. Hoever in the very center it would drop to nothing. That dark area is the area swept clean by the planets in its solar system. In other words ALL the starlight you see is actually a reflection off that solar system’s Ort Cloud and not directly from the star itself. The star would be a point too small to be directly visible by all but the strongest telescopes.. To put it another way, when you look up at a star at night ALL of the light you see is the reflected light from each stars Ort Cloud -- not the star itself. All you are looking at is "Dark Matter" being lit up locally by some star.
I have been assuming that dark matter is like a parked car you walk onto at night because it’s you can’t see it but if the dark matter is not made of atoms then what is it? So it’s not just the stuff that is too small and dark to see?
I think a better analogie would be, looking for your keys everywhere and suddenly finding them lying on the kitchen table, dark matter is right under our noses we are just looking for it in the wrong places,
So, to balance the equation to support your model and explain why things don't add up gravtionally. Invent dark matter and energy. Never be able to prove it's real.
Here you go brainiac. What if dark matter doesn’t exist. You just pulled it out of your $$$. What if what is outside the universe is causing expansion You’ll never figure it out
Could it be a by-product of the black hole? If we can only find 5% of the matter we can see maybe possibility that we have not been able to REALLY understand how much matter is actually inside the black hole. I believe that a black hole is really much bigger than we can understand properly more a black star which needs certain parts of an atom to keep it's half life like a star fusion hydrogen it's no coincidence that most of an atom is empty, its because it has capacity for more protons, neutrons and electrons,just we as humans cannot see past our own eye's there are no elements heavy enough for us to understand how heavy an atom of the black hole is.
WE NEED TO FUND SCIENTISTS DIFFERENTLY OR ALLOW THEM TO MAKE MONEY SOME OTHER WAY AND STOP THIS NONSENSE GOING ON IN ACADEMIA BECAUSE ALMOST ALL OF IT IS LIES
The observable matter isn't enough to keep a galaxy together and spinning. The dark matter turns out to be a super massive black hole at the center of every galaxy.
Maybe we are made of the exotic material and the dark matter is the normal matter. That would explain the lack of other civilizations throughout the universe.
So you calculated the gravity of a galactic structure spanning over a hundred thousand light years across? If you had, you would discover there is no extra matter.
You know. Is it possible that dark matter is just normal matter? I mean we are still occasionally finding really dim stars less than 100 light years from us. I mean space is huge. Even if you could travel from one end of a galaxy to the other at faster than light you would only have to worry about hitting anything near the center of the galaxy where the large black hole is. But if you navigated around the center when you get about 10 percent way your chances of hitting a star even out of the millions you would pass by is incredibly small. Why is the assumption that this must be some new exotic form of matter? Wouldn’t the most rational explanation be that there is probably just a lot of normal matter in-between stars that is just to dim to see. Like rouge planets, black holes with no star being sucked into them to produce light we could see, or just random clouds of gas in areas to thin for us to see. I mean there could be hundreds of near star mass planets with entire solar systems around them within 1000 light years from earth. With our current technology finding any of them would be a lucky event. Like if one passed in from of a star we happened to be studying or something. But again the chances of that is crazy small because the dark solar system would need to be so close it would probably need to be a binary system to find. Even if there is something exotic going on hear that x5 mass might only be x2, and the rest might still be normal mass. But I honestly get the impression that this is like string theory. There is a lot of interesting math being done that seems to make sense. But really it’s just that government funding is being directed to incentives smart people with PhD’s to work on nonsense rather than anything that could lead to practical technological innovations. It feels like our government is pumping money into technical fields so that no one figures out any real breakthrough that could be applied to technology, and that the real work is being done in secret if at all. There should be a project to use Orion style nuclear propulsion to send 100’s of gravitational lensing telescopes to a distance that is 10’s of time further from the sun than Neptune is. That would allow us to use the sun’s gravity to direct image a planets in a few hundred near by star systems. Then we could use that information to verify spectroscopy academic papers on exoplanets. Then we could use those same telescopes to search for father out exoplanets in systems that are in the same line of sight as the ones they can direct image. With the increased knowledge by verifying spectroscopy data we have now with direct imaging of planets we would likely be able to do much more accurate spectroscopy of further out planets. The reason that this would be a better use of time for a lot of physicists to work on is two fold. We only have so many high IQ people who could work on the technology to make this kind of project happen, and we might have only a few decades to learn weather we are surrounded by dead civilizations and how the tend to kill them selves off. We could actually get a partial sample size answer to the Fermi paradox for at least a few thousand stars. Sounds like a lot better use of high IQ physics talent than having them dick around with dark matter and sting theory, or have them give up and work at a head fund or AI company start up.
As I understand it, “seeing it” has nothing to do with it. We can’t even detect it in any sense if the word. We know it’s there because of mathematics. Perhaps that is what he means and if it is, he should be better at his choice of words.
When I look up at space at night, I see dark matter with specs of light in it. So, yea, there certainly is much more dark matter. And, during the day, I can’t see space because of that damn bright sun in my eyes.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
I feel like “dark matter” and “dark energy” are placeholders until we find out what the F is really going on.
Yeah, that's why they called it that.
I have a theory which explains it. Unified consciousness field. Working on the math, will publish it in a few years after more testing.
@egglion7931 you have math for consciousness? I say this as respectfully as I am capable. Bullshit
Yeah, until a new einstein is born
Supermassive black holes make up the difference they were looking for. Mutual attraction doesn't explain why galaxies stay together, gazillion stellar mass black hole makes the math work.
"while we cannot see it we sure do notice it's influence" is pretty much a tautology given that the only reason we think that there's dark matter is because something is influencing the universe in ways we don't understand.
You're right. But, I don't think she was trying to state a groundbreaking proposition. I think she was just giving the definitions. She could have made that more clear.
@@tickmanipulatorshe did a pretty good job making it clear, she said exactly what it was in a simple easy to understand way without muddying the understanding of what it is at the fundamental level with unnecessary specifications, just the foundation of what it actually is
Please explain how that is a tautology? She is saying we cannot see the matter that we now call dark matter, but we can see the effects of whatever it is.
Just like the discovery of Neptune which was accomplished based on mathematical calculations of its predicted position due to observed perturbations in the orbit of the planet Uranus. Astronomers saw the influence of Neptune before seeing the planet itself.
@@skpt516 no. It’s not because Neptune isn’t invisible and I inter actable
@@anatolytsinker5317 Just because dark matter hasn't been detected yet doesn't mean it won't ever be detected in the future. If dark matter is detectable, and I'm not saying it definitely will be, it is possible the technology to detect it hasn't been developed yet.
Cancer causing ionizing radiation has been a threat to life on earth for millions and millions of years, and was invisible. It was only first detected in 1890.
I'm still convinced we don't fully understand gravity. Dark matter isn't noticeable except for at galactic scales. Gravity was thought of as a force until Einstein, and now people are trying to quantify it as a particle. I think Einstein is correct and we don't fully understand how the higgs field works in the universe to warp the fabric of space time
we understand about 5%, according to their calculations.
Gravity isn't. And never has been a particle. Dark matter is the empty space outside of earth. Dark matter. Fucking either...!
As theoretical physicist and RUclips content creator Angela Collier says; "dark matter" is not a theory, it's a grouping of multiple different observations. Observations that could be the result of a single cause or many causes, that may or may not be interrelated, and that may or may not involve new fundamental particle(s).
From what I understand there are odd observations like gravitational lensing occurring where there is seemingly no or at least not correspondent normal matter to warp space-time to cause the aberrant gravitational lensing that has been observed. This means a "simple" explanation like General Relativity being wrong or incomplete, as a means to resolve the inconsistencies of our observations with our current theories, is not enough, and there must be further complexities involved.
Angela has a great video on her RUclips channel explaining everything in detail. I recommend checking it out.
I am sure fast moving charged particles flying away from each other didn't cause massive coherent magnetic and electric fields that structure the universe into a web or anything. It is just dark matter or something. I am glad we have theoretical physicists.
The way I understand it is that the term dark matter is just a placeholder until they figure out what's going on. The stars in the galaxies should be flying apart but something is holding them together. It can't really be the super massive black hole in the center because it's too far away from the outer edges. Don't be too hard on me because I'm aware that I could be completely wrong.
@tims8603 That is the basic understanding correct. I am suggesting the plasma cosmology theories are more correct. That as the big bang happened you had huge pockets of charged matter moving near speed of light which formed very strong electromagnetic fields that are coherent. The idea of dark matter comes from considering only gravity, based on the idea electromagnetism won't be coherent. But that assumes the big bang had already happened and all the scattered dust had gravity as main force acting on it because there would be no coherent EM fields.
When you look at the pictures of the universe, all the galaxies connect up and it has been determined they have coherent Birkland current ropes that wrap around them.
The problem is they don't take into account the initial conditions, and just pretend everything is everywhere randomly. The math won't work tho, so they invent 97% of all matter and 99% of energy and just assume that must be something in order to explain why there is structure.
Every major physicist today bought into dark matter/energy and they are too proud to say they might have goofed. It took a couple years for them to admit the image of the black hole they claimed to have was a rounding error in the code used to process the data. 90% of people who heard that story still never found out it was actually just a goof.
General relativity is ok from this perspective no problems there “Dark energy & matter (which is also all energy @ the atomic level) is incorrectly named”
It exists and if our perspective was beyond the event horizon then earth’s perspective would be this dark energy simple as that once we achieve a4D gravitational mapping system then it will become so obvious to everyone!
Gravitational lensing is what is hiding all the mass of energy’s because it is warped outside of our visual spectrum kind of like a combination of mirrors & mirages!
The “Big Bang” is an incorrect theory JWT shows signs of this but gravitational mapping will prove the the folding space and time is infinite mixing of the multiverse beyond our event horizons and that is better explained as a multiverse of perspectives !
Black hole is also a wormhole combined with a spin axis that is spewing out and is like our expanding universe but each worm hole or spin axis of a black hole is outside of our visual spectrum therefore beyond our event horizon gravitational lensing is a clue to show us some cause and effect of event horizons that are toying with our visual spectrum this so simple to conceive of being the norm everywhere!
It is not complicated once you realize it!
I’m not good at math and I have issues with all CULTural ideals having such obviously oppressive controls over our earthly existence even scientists have been wrong all to often so the knowledge of science is in need of a makeover!
The AI SINGULARITY is the big kicker!
My spiritual being is the proof that tells me the creation of everything is the infinite singularity & no singularity we think we can create can ever compete but our greatest comparison to the singularity is that we all love to entertain & be entertained!
All our brain wants is acquiring more knowledge stimulations our spiritual being is way more beyond all earthly CULTures! Creation itself is the infinite singularity’s entertainment!
Icons pop “I don’t care, I love it” contradiction is good for our souls!
Just be careful who you congregate with!
😎👍💯🇨🇦🙏
General relativity is ok from this perspective no problems there “Dark energy & matter (which is also all energy @ the atomic level) is incorrectly named”
It exists and if our perspective was beyond the event horizon then earth’s perspective would be this dark energy simple as that once we achieve a4D gravitational mapping system then it will become so obvious to everyone!
Gravitational lensing is what is hiding all the mass of energy’s because it is warped outside of our visual spectrum kind of like a combination of mirrors & mirages!
The “Big Bang” is an incorrect theory JWT shows signs of this but gravitational mapping will prove the the folding space and time is infinite mixing of the multiverse beyond our event horizons and that is better explained as a multiverse of perspectives !
Black hole is also a wormhole combined with a spin axis that is spewing out and is like our expanding universe but each worm hole or spin axis of a black hole is outside of our visual spectrum therefore beyond our event horizon gravitational lensing is a clue to show us some cause and effect of event horizons that are toying with our visual spectrum this so simple to conceive of being the norm everywhere!
It is not complicated once you realize it!
I’m not good at math and I have issues with all CULTural ideals having such obviously oppressive controls over our earthly existence even scientists have been wrong all to often so the knowledge of science is in need of a makeover!
The AI SINGULARITY is the big kicker!
My spiritual being is the proof that tells me the creation of everything is the infinite singularity & no singularity we think we can create can ever compete but our greatest comparison to the singularity is that we all love to entertain & be entertained!
All our brain wants is acquiring more knowledge stimulations our spiritual being is way more beyond all earthly CULTures! Creation itself is the infinite singularity’s entertainment!
Icons pop “I don’t care, I love it” contradiction is good for our souls!
Just be careful who you congregate with!
😎👍💯🇨🇦🙏
The word "dark matter" doesn't exactly describe it.
Dark gravity describes it better.
One thing we know is that it doesn't stop light from going through it like a black hole.
So it's transparent matter.
It's a place holder term for some thing that either can't currently be observed or it's something that has eluded most current equations - I vote the later which is why I hate the terms Dar Matter and Dark Energy, they seem kind of ignorant.
@1ManNamedDan but we are ignorant, the whole world.
@@bluemarble_YTNo, we're just willing to say idk and come up with ideas until we fully understand.
By definition gravity is "dark".....we can't see it
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" Carl Sagan
I'm not sure if you're with or against the conversation. But they have absolutely done the math using these observations to determine that baryonic matter only adds up to 5% of the totality of the universe. Just because we can't interact with dark matter, doesn't mean it isn't there. We've even observed the effects of it gravitationally, and it is also the only thing that can explain how galaxies spin the way they do at the speeds they do. As she said, just because we don't see it, we DO see it's influence. It would be like saying you don't believe in the air you breath to stay alive because you can't see the individual oxygen and nitrogen atoms. We do in fact, have an extraordinary amount of evidence that it exists and must exist for the universe to work the way we observe it to.
@@Vazik05 Stop believing hypothesis' as fact. There are plenty of competing theories to explain these phenomenon's and none of them (including dark matter) seem complete but all potentially viable. Biggest problem with science today is these theorists speaking out about their theories as fact in order to sell them to the masses. Biggest disservice to physics since the dark ages as it closes people minds to alternative explanations that have yet to be found. Until you show me a jar of this dark matter I hold it right up there with the Easter bunny. If it makes up 95% of the universe it shouldn't be that hard to find a jar of it.
In itself that is true, but that has nothing to do with this video.
@@Vazik05 The ONLY thing that can explain it? So they pull some theory out their asses and go looking for something that fixes their problem, and when they can't find anything they give that no-evidence a name that implies it's matter??? Dark energy/matter is a bullshit theory. It will be dispelled, but meanwhile we'll keep doing actual science.
Russ, you know how sometimes you go swimming and your foot touches something underwater, you don't know what it is but you feel it? That's Dark Matter. It's there regardless of whether you know all the details about it because whatever it is, your foot touched it.
Fab analogy with the keys and lamp post, shedding some daylight on the problem.. wait..
I don’t believe you.. not based on the glasses alone but they were a factor
If scientists think of galaxies as Islands and space as the ocean, it makes more sense. Dark matter is the heft and mass of the island. Visible matter is the life that evolved on that island.
Dark matter is the only medium where visible matter can exist or come from.
I believe when the universe started to cool down the clumps of dark matter created the regions where visible light can form. And the reason it has more gravitational power is because it acts as a viscous field that keeps everything together.
One of the best hypotheses I read thus far….
@@dirtygrandpa-n2l Thank you. Scientists are now postulating that Dark Matter was there before the big bang and the inflation caused by the big bang created space allowing dark to separate into clumps and create the galaxies.
I believe dark matter existed on its own and needed inflation to create time. If there was a singularity of dark matter and intrinsic pressure fluctuations that bottlenecked in it, it would eventually and suddenly bang.
If dark matter is that abundant, why can’t we feel it on this planet or even inside the solar system? Why solar system seems to follow newton’s laws without the need for dark matter?
First dark matter seems to be more effective at the very macroscopic. It keeps the galaxies from flying apart since there isn't enough normal matter to account for the gravity needed to contain the rotational speed.
Second once you get to Mercury's orbit, Newton's laws fall apart. That was the whole reason why Einstein came up with general and special relativity, Mercury's orbit was off from what Newton's laws predicted. Newton's laws work great on the macroscopic level, but get close enough to massive objects general relativity takes over.
It’s too dilute on small scales. I mean it averages to 5 solar masses within a few light years.
If it existed, we should be able to interact with it especially if it makes up 95% of matter
Dark matter is the infinitely variable quantity that can be used to explain every inexplicable observation.
The truth is that we don't know if dark matter really exist and at the rate of our understanding we need to understand the universe...
Not seeing it is one thing. But what gets me is that if it is there, shouldn't it filter out some of the light, or obscure some of it? Unless it is small black holes spread throughout the galaxy? Unless we all miss something very fundamental. For instance; you say that it must be dark (or unobserveable) *matter*. But who says that it must be matter?
The way we describe energy/matter when it comes to these unseen forces doesn't add up. When using the Schwarzschild metric for the observable universe, including dark matter/energy, the radius is somewhere ~3x the current observable universe' radius.
Is the stuff that we cannot see actually here? Or is our notion of gravity screwed up in some way? Maybe we are not moving the way it seems we are. So there is no missing mass.
Maybe "Matter" and "Energy" are two states of universe. We know a lot about matter side of it and energy that interacts with the matter. Like gravitation, electric, magnetic etc. But the vast other side of universe "Energyverse" which is not contained by space or time is inaccessible. Even "Meterialverse" is not fully revealed and understood by human quest.
Just some random thoughts to connect to consciousness.
Consciousness may be a manifestation of energy from energyverse injecting into meterialverse to understand meterialverse. We are all meterialnauts trying to figure out what is meterialverse send from energyverse.
By matter we here mean stuff that has mass (participates in gravity)
I get the idea, just as a doctor who spent years stuffing up the conscious universe with simple GABA agonists...I think you have it wrong
Matter is a different state of ENERGY. Dark matter is something else entirely. Perhaps an alternate kind of energy coalesced into an alternate kind of matter. But probaly, "dark matter" is a long-range gravity field produced by a galaxy's central black hole and other ancient black holes which predate the Big Bang.
Yet all this materialism is percieved by mind. Take mind away, and there goes the neighbourhood! Keep thinking! 🤔
@ True. Observer which is mind collapses the wave function. Does that mean there could be a universal mind that collapsed the energy to create the meterialverse at some point called big bang? I think I’m crazy 🤪
Joseph Priestley, the subject in the book "The Man Who Invented Air".
“The Invention of Air”
Could a deeper understanding of dark matter and dark energy fundamentally challenge our current understanding of the Big Bang theory and its implications for the emergence of life on Earth?
Its the field of space itself, which IS something. As he noted its 'exotic' which means we just don't know what is is. But there's something there.
You detect the existence of something, because of perception and the mathematics of the cosmos, but we have no idea on what it is that is influencing the universe around us...
Logically it's simply a dimension we can't yet perceive. 🤔
It’s all an encapsulated dead body going through organic decomposition. The consciousness is now experiencing things from a much smaller scale, and perspective. 🎶 Ooh look what you made me do. 🎶
Under certain light conditions you can see it dancing in the reflections of diamonds
Could it just be all the plants we can’t see?
Someday we will discover that it’s really hideous monsters and ghouls looking down at our universe in a fish tank type display in a zoo or aquarium type setting
Interesting to find out in our galaxy dark matter is 5x more prevalent than white (normal) matter. But its more interesting to share why dark matter does not give off light -- its simply compressed space. This compressed space has a refractive index causing the bending of light to be confused with gravitational lensing -- its just optical lensing.
The current researchers need to take a hard look at the Bullet Cluster and how a cloud of supposedly dark matter with a strong gravitational properties can separate from baryonic (normal) matter. The "Left hand does not match the right".
Dark matter is not matter.. its energy and when interacting with matter it creates gravity. Thats why I believe what surrounds the proton and nucleus of an atom is not an electron particle, it’s an energy field. When atoms create molecules and molecules create matter, the energy fields combined with dark matter create gravity. The density of matter creates an implied gravitational field and can distort space.
She is absolutely correct, we know very little
It's not exotic it's just an absence of such depth that it seems solid. She knows nothing more than the first primitive that looked up at the sky and noticed much of it is dark.
Supermassive black holes make up the difference they were looking for. Mutual attraction doesn't explain why galaxies stay together, gazillion stellar mass black hole makes the math work.
If dark matter were real, wouldn't we observe unpredictable stellar and/or galactic orbits? I mean we can observe orbits and make sense of their trajectories based on the gravitational effects and the combined center of gravity of the particular system under observation. But how can you make heads or tails out of system in gravitational equilibrium where only 20% of all matter contributing to its center of gravity can be accounted for?
So weird. I looked at the night sky and see mostly darkness with little dots of light. Who could have possibly predicted this?!
Maybe if atoms are
Dark matter is concentrated space which is in the process of becoming matter eventually when it becomes a big bang! in essense it is thick space not yet concentrated enought to produce the first particles!
I think it is better to say, exotic material is not dark matter but ordinary matter… just 5% of the universe … it is not mainstream and not abundant.
I still say it should be called dark gravity until it is figured out, since we don't know if it's matter or not.
Humans are sight based animals. Thus we complain when something is not visible . Question is...what other energies and resonances could we detect from 'dark' matter ?
"Thus we complain when something is not visible"
That's flat earth science. "Zetetics" is the argument that if you can't see it with your own eyes then it doesn't exist. You're in great company.
@@kitmoore9969That's not flat earth science... That's literally part of the Scientific method.
Observation.
@@kitmoore9969 Flat earth science ignores any argument or evidence that would disprove it. They claimed the midnight sun doesn't happen on Antarctica. So several flat earthers and normals were invited to go to Antarctica to prove it once and for all. All paid for. Not a single flat earther took up the offer.
when we invert being 'sight based' does that mean we become faith-based. accepting our limitations of sight and science and living beyond it 'with Gods help'. hearing 'its icy be carefull' and dismissing it as a thought from self, then falling down and sliding because you refused to listen to an unknown thought.
Is this dark matter transparent also? And light goes thru it?
Yeah, somehow it's just there where it doesn't obstruct vision of the sun and the other stars.
Ridicules theory, I agree.
Hi
The weird thing about ‘Alt Fen’ is that even if NOBODY knows what it is, it affects EVERYTHING!😮
What happen to Martha Stewart
LOL...Jail was pretty hard on her. She looks older and beat up now.
I could have sworn that was Morgan Fairchild.
It's a dude!
She got a PhD...
Its Marth's nerdy twin
It actually is much more propable that the physics theories are wrong and we missing or misunderstand something than the "dark matter" "dark energy" or "dark gravity" hypothesis.
I think dark matter is just a property of spacetime itself and only reveals its selfs more if there is a lot of it. At slow speeds/little space you dont account for special relativity but with high speeds/big spaces it comes into play, maybe something else is coming into play then...
If baryonic (atomic) matter is only 5% of total mass, wouldn't it be more accurate to say that it is exotic, and that dark matter is "normal"?
If space is related to time, then it makes sense that matter has to be related to gravity, dark matter or standard photon reactive matter that is visible to humans. This means that there are so many ways tk sù7⁷⁷
It seems clear that there some dimensional aspect of gravity that we don’t fully understand
Dark matter is simply matter that occupies the same space as our regular matter but is simply out of phase or frequency
my guess, there is a rather more simple mechanism to all of it. see galileo galilei, or the space time warp, lets shift the perspective again.
I don’t think ‘strange’ is an apt word. I don’t think anything in the universe is strange. Maybe strange for us. But everything that is , is everything that could be. If it exists it’s because it could. Our ability to detect or interact with it or not has no bearing on anything. The universe is under no obligation to makes sense to us. If anything at all our lack of understanding only exposes our current limitations. With time we may gain new insights or maybe we never will, maybe it’s something we may never get to interact with just by the contrast of our natures.
If everything I mean, everything is expanding and accelerating at the same time then we would not know it, However, it would provide the appearance of gravity.
Dark matter is dilated mass. Dilation is the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". This doesn't mean mass increases, it means mass becomes spread throughout spacetime relative to an outside observer. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation. A graph illustrates its squared nature, it increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light.
It occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. This has been accepted for a long time.
The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. Sound familiar? This is the explanation for dark matter/galaxy rotation curves. The "missing mass" is dilated mass.
Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 ultra diffuse galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. In other words they have normal rotation rates.
This IS an interesting comment. I encourage you to write a paper on this topic; if you do not have the sufficient technical background seek a coauthor who does have the necessary credentials.
@SDH757 I kinda already have a coauthor, Einstein. He explained dark matter in 1939 -
"The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
Wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, dilation will occur. This forbids astronomical concentrations of mass. Einstein repeatedly spoke about this. Nobody believed in singularities when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Dirac, Pauli, Feynman etc. for this reason.
99.8% of the mass in our solar system is in the sun. 99.9% of the mass in an atom is in the nucleus. This indicates 100's of trillions of solar masses at the center of common spiral galaxies. Due to dilation, the mass in our own galactic center exists in a "non local" state. In other words it's not just there, it's everywhere. Mass is a clingy thing thanks to gravity. It makes sense that it would exist as a halo.
Awesome answer except for the part where you still refer to it as dark matter.
@@SDH757 I made a video on the subject, over a thousand people agree with me so far. I tried to post on arXiv but I need a sponsor. I know it's just a matter of time before more people realize this. I am a big SR-71 fan too.
@@shawns0762 👍🏻🧑🏼🚀
And the human beat goes on....
Forget to a point the expansive outer life and give inner life a chance, then we will see it all.
ALL SYSTEMS NEED CHECKED AND OVERHAULED THE OLD WAYS ARE OVER WE NEED TO PICK UP THE PIECES AND MOVE ON AND LEAVE ALL THE PEOPLE WHO CAN'T TELL THE TRUTH BEHIND
"Our math is fucked up.
Let's make some shit up."
"Deal. Bet." Said ALL OF THE SCIENTISTS instead of admitting they didn't know a thing.
maybe that mass comes from the neutrinos, the space is full of these particles and they don’t interact with anything
If our universe is collapsing in a black hole then wouldn't it make sense that all the dark matter surrounding us would be other matter that has also collapsed into the black hole and not be seen by us because we're too busy creating our own space within the black hole
Why can’t gravity leak into other dimensions. Dark matter would simply be the effect of gravity coming from matter into other dimensions. Spacetime deforming almost imply an additional dimension
I think it is a reaction of the mass in our universe with the mass of the cosmos. Dark energy also, a reaction with "empty" space and the cosmos..
As I understand it, higher dimensions are not a place. Something cannot "come from" another dimension. the 7 higher dimensions are knots of spacetime wrapped tightly together. That is obviously a gross oversimplification but you get the idea. It is entirely possible that those invisible dimensions have a direct effect on gravity in our visible 3 dimensional universe + time as the fourth.
We use the word dimension to describe spacial measurement. I personally can't imagine a further dimension and I'm not sure anyone else can.
It's like when you receive a package in the mail, dark matter is the packing around the item.
crazy that they can’t just admit that we are completely wrong. I mean if my theory only had 5% of its mass explained and accounted for i’d be laughed at. We went so far down the wrong hole that the smartest people in the world are out here sounding like fools.
They might as well call it magic.
Scientists found out they were wrong in that. Now they are on it. That‘s the great thing about science. It is a system that can prove hypotheses right or wrong and proceed to find out the truth. Done countless times, work goes on.
@@HarryGuit you do realize they are still exploring the same theories and now believe in dark matter and energy more than they ever have? they haven’t moved on at all. Science is great, until morons start treating established science as gospel, like today, ideas outside the established science are treated like they are woo-woo. science hasn’t innovated anything, other than cosmetically, in the last 100 years. Don’t treat science as a religion and it works but when you do, you end up with the objectively asinine theories that cannot be proven ever, like today.
doesn't necessarily mean we are wrong about anything. Just that our current understanding is incomplete. This is what science is about. Taking what works and building on it. If we were wrong about everything you wouldn't have a cell phone. we wouldn't be putting satellites in orbit, or a million other advances.
@@hashpond420 Are you trolling or are you really that ignorant?
What a striking looking woman! 😍
“Hello darkness my old friend “
Everything is dark matter even the everyday objects we see.we see the everyday objects ,because they they have the potentiality to absorb light.
This is so mysterious. 5% we see. 95% is what we don't/can't see. We just know there's something out there. 😬
It just means our physics is wrong.
It’s ok this all stems from the “Yet” part of this experience and what is being referred to as “dark matter “ isn’t really dark.. it’s just the fact that we are ignorant about it other than the fact that it exists and has a place in the fabric of the accumulation of the material that is being interpreted as the essence that is making up the universe and whatever it is that is currently possible for us to measure and understand, which we can all agree is because we are only able to observe less than one % of the visible light spectrum and we are a very low vibrational physical existence in our 3d-4D environment so we are just victims of circumstance and happenstance, given the fact that we have no control over the realm in which we are currently able to experience outside of a much larger and esoteric topic that isn’t something that has to be conversed at this point. But we are just limited in the way we are able to observe and measure and we are only just dipping a toe into the vastness of the information that is waiting to be seen and understood. Just like we have no way to explain why certain people with an ability to receive or access information they couldn’t possibly have or even have a way to get to said information can. And we are all just trying to understand what we can’t give a reason or example to help our counterparts to have proof or evidence that we have fruitful in the process that we are using to experience and document our findings in a scientific manner that is oh so important for the majority to except, and to be honest I don’t think that we are improving our understanding of what we are capable and how we are able to process and understand our data as we are able to see and interpret the information we 3d semiconscious beings that we are using the vailed senses that we are trying to understand and measure material data that is being perceived in one way and it’s unhindered and actual forms. It’s like trying to watch Avatar on nothing more than a flip book. Yeah I know that I can make the most out of the movie by the way I implement creativity and spontaneity to make the experience better but it’s not going to change the fact that it’s not the same as what we have given you watch it via video and it’s counterpart audio 😊 it’s just what we think we have and the way that we are able to perceive what is is completely different and we have nothing to lose from being patient and putting a pin in it and moving forward with the experiences that we are able to actually see or experience in a way that is able to be documented and we are able to interact with on some level of what we call the scientific method.
“Although we don’t see it, we sure see its influence” is not “the weird thing about dark matter.” It’s literally the definition of dark matter. What’s weird is that we observed an influence and assumed it’s caused by matter.
But the source of gravity is matter.
...or we may have to revisit how we define matter. New discoveries have a habit of forcing us to redefine our previous assumptions of nature with higher resolution.
Well doesn’t this suck for space travel? If most of the galaxy is made up of stuff we can’t see, how the heck are we going to avoid running into it???
Don’t worry, it doesn’t exist
Turns out there seemingly is no dark matter after all. One can only guess at what we'll know tomorrow.
I saw a lot of dark matter in my toilet this morning
Is there less matter in the Universe today?
Obviously matter is being converted into energy every moment.
We can only "see" the matter that's in the process of converting matter into energy.
How much matter has stopped converting matter into energy and has gone dark?
Is all of the mass of all the energy ever converted being included when calculating the mass of the universe?
If so, how is the mass of a stream of visible photons being calculated going back 14+ billion years?
It's called the aether where all the sub -atom structures exist, your consciousness exists as sub-atomic structures in the aether. Your body is the sacrificial scaffolding to build your soul. If you have a good scaffolding, you will have a good soul, take care of you scaffolding.
It is amazing how some people believe in this stuff. I understand religions to some extend due to the cultural infusion of such beliefs, but the believe some charlatans who are there just to make a buck is pretty sad.
I don't understand why people are so baffled that a star is just a small portion of things in space. You mean it has to be so massive as to glow before it is important enough to count?
Planets, moons, asteroids, and comets are all "Dark Matter".
But there's more.
Have you ever seen those old Volvo headlights that were massive but dim? A large but dim light puts out more light than a very bright pinpoint.
Let me put it another way.
If you made a chart of the imtensity of light coming from a star it would look like a bell curve not a spike. Hoever in the very center it would drop to nothing. That dark area is the area swept clean by the planets in its solar system. In other words ALL the starlight you see is actually a reflection off that solar system’s Ort Cloud and not directly from the star itself. The star would be a point too small to be directly visible by all but the strongest telescopes..
To put it another way, when you look up at a star at night ALL of the light you see is the reflected light from each stars Ort Cloud -- not the star itself. All you are looking at is "Dark Matter" being lit up locally by some star.
I love how all the people that outsmart astrophysicists are getting together right here in the comments ❤❤❤😂
Either the galaxies are orbiting something or the galaxies are going down a very big drain witch could be a very big black hole by another name.
Hebrews 1:3 He holds the universe together and expands it by the mighty power of his spoken word" Dark mater is the presence of the eternal GOD..
It's the 4th dimension we can't see or comprehend...same as the difference between 2d and 3d.
Or it could be a combination of 4th , 5th and 6th Dimensions !
@@keithtodd8631 If the music is good..that would be cool !
I have been assuming that dark matter is like a parked car you walk onto at night because it’s you can’t see it but if the dark matter is not made of atoms then what is it? So it’s not just the stuff that is too small and dark to see?
I think a better analogie would be, looking for your keys everywhere and suddenly finding them lying on the kitchen table, dark matter is right under our noses we are just looking for it in the wrong places,
Gravity is multi-dimensional and dark matter is matter in other dimensions.
I think if gravity extended into over dimensions, it wouldn't fall of as the square of the distance.
I was also thinking that..what if dark matter is just the effects of gravity/energy from a higher dimension?
OK, how would you design an experiment to test that?
This is what would happen if Skylar became the kingpin
So, to balance the equation to support your model and explain why things don't add up gravtionally. Invent dark matter and energy. Never be able to prove it's real.
Here you go brainiac. What if dark matter doesn’t exist. You just pulled it out of your $$$. What if what is outside the universe is causing expansion You’ll never figure it out
Could it be a by-product of the black hole? If we can only find 5% of the matter we can see maybe possibility that we have not been able to REALLY understand how much matter is actually inside the black hole. I believe that a black hole is really much bigger than we can understand properly more a black star which needs certain parts of an atom to keep it's half life like a star fusion hydrogen it's no coincidence that most of an atom is empty, its because it has capacity for more protons, neutrons and electrons,just we as humans cannot see past our own eye's there are no elements heavy enough for us to understand how heavy an atom of the black hole is.
WE NEED TO FUND SCIENTISTS DIFFERENTLY OR ALLOW THEM TO MAKE MONEY SOME OTHER WAY AND STOP THIS NONSENSE GOING ON IN ACADEMIA BECAUSE ALMOST ALL OF IT IS LIES
When did the aether become 'dark matter'?
I don't know the answer to this aether.
Another word for eather is planck.
The observable matter isn't enough to keep a galaxy together and spinning. The dark matter turns out to be a super massive black hole at the center of every galaxy.
Maybe we are made of the exotic material and the dark matter is the normal matter. That would explain the lack of other civilizations throughout the universe.
Dark matter is the canvas behind the painting?
You must have a “backdrop”?
So you calculated the gravity of a galactic structure spanning over a hundred thousand light years across? If you had, you would discover there is no extra matter.
It should be as simple as putting a lid on your cooking pot, and then study what is inside.
You know. Is it possible that dark matter is just normal matter? I mean we are still occasionally finding really dim stars less than 100 light years from us. I mean space is huge.
Even if you could travel from one end of a galaxy to the other at faster than light you would only have to worry about hitting anything near the center of the galaxy where the large black hole is. But if you navigated around the center when you get about 10 percent way your chances of hitting a star even out of the millions you would pass by is incredibly small.
Why is the assumption that this must be some new exotic form of matter? Wouldn’t the most rational explanation be that there is probably just a lot of normal matter in-between stars that is just to dim to see. Like rouge planets, black holes with no star being sucked into them to produce light we could see, or just random clouds of gas in areas to thin for us to see.
I mean there could be hundreds of near star mass planets with entire solar systems around them within 1000 light years from earth. With our current technology finding any of them would be a lucky event. Like if one passed in from of a star we happened to be studying or something. But again the chances of that is crazy small because the dark solar system would need to be so close it would probably need to be a binary system to find.
Even if there is something exotic going on hear that x5 mass might only be x2, and the rest might still be normal mass. But I honestly get the impression that this is like string theory. There is a lot of interesting math being done that seems to make sense. But really it’s just that government funding is being directed to incentives smart people with PhD’s to work on nonsense rather than anything that could lead to practical technological innovations. It feels like our government is pumping money into technical fields so that no one figures out any real breakthrough that could be applied to technology, and that the real work is being done in secret if at all.
There should be a project to use Orion style nuclear propulsion to send 100’s of gravitational lensing telescopes to a distance that is 10’s of time further from the sun than Neptune is. That would allow us to use the sun’s gravity to direct image a planets in a few hundred near by star systems. Then we could use that information to verify spectroscopy academic papers on exoplanets. Then we could use those same telescopes to search for father out exoplanets in systems that are in the same line of sight as the ones they can direct image.
With the increased knowledge by verifying spectroscopy data we have now with direct imaging of planets we would likely be able to do much more accurate spectroscopy of further out planets.
The reason that this would be a better use of time for a lot of physicists to work on is two fold. We only have so many high IQ people who could work on the technology to make this kind of project happen, and we might have only a few decades to learn weather we are surrounded by dead civilizations and how the tend to kill them selves off. We could actually get a partial sample size answer to the Fermi paradox for at least a few thousand stars.
Sounds like a lot better use of high IQ physics talent than having them dick around with dark matter and sting theory, or have them give up and work at a head fund or AI company start up.
Dark matter is most likely some kind of electromagnetic function is not yet understood.
All of it is accounted in G the Gravitational Constant...but it is not discovered yet...
Axions, Machos, or Whimps?
Never heard which one it turned out to be.
Space without light is very dark
Ask those guys responsible for this "drone flap" ..they can explain for sure what mistake we make.
As I understand it, “seeing it” has nothing to do with it. We can’t even detect it in any sense if the word. We know it’s there because of mathematics.
Perhaps that is what he means and if it is, he should be better at his choice of words.
Why isn't it Oort clouds and kuiper belts, I don't think it's a mystery, it's just scientists and the scientific method.
Dark matter will be the dumbest reveal one day when they figure it out.
They keep find more massive black holes..lots more regular matter in there than we suspect..imo
When I look up at space at night, I see dark matter with specs of light in it. So, yea, there certainly is much more dark matter. And, during the day, I can’t see space because of that damn bright sun in my eyes.
I didn’t know Caitlin Jenner knew so much about physics
lol thats mean lol
In fairness, she's just spewing bs
@@joex9865 What is the basis of your claim that she is spewing bs, and do you have independent, verifiable evidence to support that claim?
@@skpt516 About as much as she has spewing her BS. Much of modern science is BS.