@@TheBronzeSword reallifelore just plaigerizes posts from a few different subreddits, everyone in the vexillology and cartography subreddits thinks hes an ass because he just steals viral stuff from them and a few others, and doesnt give credit. its not that he just steals the idea, he just goes over what someone there says point for point with no additional researh or insight added. I liked him till he I found that out, and saw him do it
10:42 as a diver i can add up that you can actually feel and see when you crossed thermocline. Water becomes actually darker and you feel sudden cold. Idk, but i think differences can be 5 or so degrees in celcius.
deserts are an important ecosystem as well let this not be overlooked. It takes most desert plants much longer to grow and they are all specially adapted over millions of years. Makes sense that they are not as productive for example as a deciduous forest. The silt and blowing sediments from deserts are the reason for productivity of the land down wind. Everything is connected. Love the videos!
Multi discipline and common sense. Some guy asked what’s his data source? As if there were one source. Many disciplines, education, curiosity and common sense.
@Archock Encanto uff... this hurts. are you gonna tell us next that learning must be painful and thst work is inherently suffering? im a neuroscientist and engineer, have researched learning and written papers on learning improvements, stating that you cannot learn when expecting entertainment is crazy. the contrary is the case - we learn BEST when not expecting having to learn. entertainment in nearly every instance leads to highrr amounts of deep processing which connects more ideas together creating the associative memory - which has higher retrival rates and shows correlation with creative idea formation.
@Archock Encanto Ok listen buddy having a job doesn't make you smart most people around nowadays have no talent nor brains for example mumble rappers and is there a reason you aren't the main professor? oh wait guess you dont quality all you need to do is copy the professor and say the things he usually says to the students to get by.... Also whats wrong with an anime profile picture are you claiming that people with any sort of background that doesnt have a profile picture dumb? I think you make a perfect of example of the retarded teachers who don't know what they are teaching nowadays you guys are literally SCREWING UP THE NEXT GENERATION just so YOU CAN MAKE A LIVING
@Archock Encanto just because your dumbass has a job as a professor doesn't mean you are smart its like saying "I knew stephen hawking" that doesnt make you smart but this is what you are doing you are saying smart because you are affiliated to a genius
Wow I'm extremely impressed. I thought when you're video popped up it would be crap and click bate. ... But I stand corrected the content seems to be right up there with others like windover, second thought and CPG Grey
@@_JayRamsey_ I suggest watching Wendovers geopolitical videos and then comparing then to a dedicated geopolitics channel like Caspianreports or Strategy stuff. It's a general trend in many of the 10-minute infotainment channels that they sometimes cover a topic in a somewhat shallow manner without declaring that it's covered in shallow manner. That doesn't take away from them of course or mean that they are wrong, but sometimes it simplify topics more than it perhaps should to make them more appealing and shorter. Wendovers videos seem to often be a visual summary of an article or similiar, and i wish they would be more upfront about such things in the videos.
This is an absolutely fan-bloody-tastic video. Amazing. It gives me chills just how much I learned in this one video, even though I've spent the last half decade on RUclips learning about different aspects of our world. My next Patreon contribution is set. Subbed.
Lou_Pit929 yeah, but according to reality it's not true because most of ocean bottom is empty. I hate this type of tv shows that tries hard to be smart.
@@LovelyAngel. I mean it's a song that really doesn't try to be smart. It has such lyrics as "the heat was hot". I like the song, but it has two chords and lazy lyrics. Don't think anyone would describe it as a smart song.
Wow this channel is so underrated, I came here a few days ago from the doggerland video and I was just blown away by your content, keep doing what you're doing :)
holy shit, I didn't even notice this was the same channel as the Doggerland video xD I just happened to watch that one yesterday, and saw this today and thought "oh hey, I love the ocean, this should be neat"
When analyzing the three ecosystems graphs, i was suprised that swamp/marshlands where such highly productive zones - its 3rd in productivity! It intrigued me so I intended to research it afterwards. However I was HIGHLY impressed that as I continued watching the video, you mentioned the phenomon and expanded on it, far exceeding my expectations for the video and increasing my curiosity on the subject! I am absolutely amazed by this content and the research that I can't give it a high enough applause. AMAZING JOB
This is one of the best channels I have ever come aacross. No long intros that aren't related to the video. Everything is interesting. Nice music and editing... Subscribed pap!
This video is amazing. I've known for years that oceans are effectively deserts, but before now I've never been able to get a satisfying answer as to why. Your explanation was so clear and comprehensive; thank you for answering this really big, really important question I've been unable to find an answer for for years.
@@Mikasks Actually, there are people that build coral reefs for a living. They sink ships, use construction material, concrete, and other materials for barnacles, corals, and oysters to attach themselves to which in turn brings other sea life into the area. They even grow corals for these projects to seed the new reefs. It's hard to do especially in a hurricane-prone area of the ocean where the new corals are ripped off the ocean floor, but they keep trying and sometimes are successful. They may be man-made/artificial coral reefs, but they are coral reefs just the same.
The Nile is home to one of the most intensive agricultural lands in the world. Going back thousands of years the Egyptians would capture its flood waters to allow nutrient-rich sediments to be deposited. An irrigation system like this persists to this day, reducing the total nutrients exiting the river through the delta. Without those nutrients, you're not going to have a spike in productivity.
@@AtlasPro1 Fascinating! So, then, we could potentially stop the sorts of mass die offs of fish from rivers dumping fertilizer into the ocean you talked about with a sufficiently advanced irrigation system?
It really depends on the river. For ones like the Amazon and Mississippi, it'd be more effective to stop stripping the land of its vegetation to stop erosion from draining all the nutrients away.
Incredible video! Just discovered the channel, I've been blown away by how informative and educational they are. This one in particular really puts a lot of things together. Thanks so much!
This totally reminds me of the first weeks of Marine Biology lol and you explain it so good in a short amount of time. My professor took the whole to explain the thermocline and all the cold water and the rivers dumping into the oceans. By the way it only took 2 videos to convince me to subscribe. KEEP IT UP!!!🐢
There's been some talk of plastic-eating bacteria, which makes me wonder about how the deployment of these will affect these nutrient zones. The deployment of these bacteria to places like "the garbage patch" will break down plastics, which is likely to create nutrients, which in turn could make less productive areas more productive.
"The ocean is a desert with it's life underground And a perfect disguise above. Under the cities lies a heart made of ground But the humans will give no love"
The river in india that you pointed out is the Ganges. Eventually it meets with the brahmaputra river in Bangladesh. This rich floodplain/swampland that is created is known as Bengal, one of the most productive, densely populated places on earth. It is home to the country Bangladesh (home to 160 million people) and the Indian state of West Bengal (home to around 90 million)
Thank you🤗 me and my son are learning more with your videos. I hope you RUclips values your educative intentions to provide others. And always people like you be able to teach humanity to continue the pattern in a lifetime.
The independent measurement parameter is mass. While not wanting to rain on this xlnt parade, consider that coral productivity 3:42 is skewed by calcium (a heavy alkali metal) which the polyps capture to make their shells. By comparison, forests 4:05 capture carbon and oxygen (low-mass nonmetals) to make cellulose for their bodies. Coral biomes put a thumb on the scale with calcium carbonate. What would happen to the comparison by counting only the polyps' body mass alone? I suspect forests would pop up.
@@avabethmcghee3048 Not necessarily. Ecologists (on land, at least) often make a point of measuring bioproductivity by comparing biomass amounts only after they've literally de-hydrated all the water out -- "dry biomass fraction". That's because it can often be very hard to get good comparable measurements of plant, etc material; once you've "harvested" it in a form that makes it possible to weigh it, some dehydration is almost bound to happen, plus differing plant materials can have differing proportions of water in their natural state. So drying out all the water became one of the standards for coming up with these standardized measurements of biomass in an ecosystem. Trying to calculate biologically active material by only measuring the carbon involved is another strategy. So Michie TN may have a good point. Anyone trying to come up with a solid method for comparing relative biological activity between two ecosystems can run into all sorts of interesting twists. In fact, figuring out how those twists change the meaning of previous and ongoing research is probably a pretty good way to earn a thesis or even a research career. Although I'd bet, even with some tweaks to allow for coral's use of calcium in their structures compared to say, trees -- they still are substantial contributor's to total biomass.
Thank you for mapping the interesting point, that nutrients are the limiting factor of productivity in the ocean. One comments: The water flowing into the gulf of Bengal is only partly from the Brahmaputra. Much of the water is from the Ganges, and the indicated river bed is actually the Ganges.
@@threezysworld8089- how are the waves a limiting factors of life in ocean? And how is the density of water, which is nearly constant? . . . As to the water depth: of course, nearly all ocean life is limited to the ocean, by definition, but that's a local constant, not a regulator.
@@threezysworld8089 - our exchange seems to be only an exchange about words and their meaning. . . . "Density" is the ratio of mass to volume, in kg/m^3, that is nearly constant for seawater. You meant that life is mostly confined to that water where sun light reaches and photosynthesis happens, and that is correct, too. . . . "Limiting factors" are parameters that change from locality to locality and on whose value another factor, here life activity, depends. Penetration of light into seawater, however, is nearly constant across the oceans - scientists would call it a "boundary condition" (which is fixed) not a limiting factor. . . . But the supply of the oceans' top layers with nutrients varies a lot between locations, and it strongly impacts local life activity (more nutrients means more activity or productivity), which was the message of the video. That supply can be called the "limiting factor". . . . Finally, could you explain, please, why you think the WAVES are an important factor? I don't see it now.
Can you help me explain the Nile river delta in Egypt. Was thinking about that and I do the activity spike that you would expect And the south and the Mediterranean sea also is odd. I wonder if someone is gonna see this and get an appropriate answer
You make absolutely incredible videos considering your RUclips popularity especially views, perhaps do a collaboration so more people get to know you, its not that you don't deserve more but RUclips doesn't recommend you enough for the people wgo want this content.
Found your channel about a week ago and I love your content. I'm a huge fan of learning about our all types of things including spirituality, nature, science; things such as our planet, history, all types of life, space, etc it strongly interest me. Definitely agree that the ocean is a desert and I've believed that for many years. I haven't been able to check out many of your videos yet being I just found the channel but I will. This was a good one like the others and I especially appreciate topics of oceans and water in general but as I stated, i love the content I've seen thus far. Myself being an educator i also appreciate your willingness and desire to teach others through this channel. Much thanks bruh
Firstly, let me say that this video is wonderfully informative - just like all the other Atlas Pro videos I have seen so far! Secondly, it provokes the question of why we humans are not trying to create regions with lots of artificial upwellings which could significantly increase the biological productivity of the oceans. Beneficial outcomes of this would include: increased sequestration of CO2, reduction of the rate of ocean acidification, significant increase in fish stocks which could supply much needed protein for people, and could even be used to protect coral reefs from bleaching by keeping them cool so they don't overheat. As well as this, the size and power of tropical cyclones could be reduced by preventing the ocean surface from getting to much warmer in the areas where they are formed. All the technology needed to do this on a vast scale already exists, because none of it is 'rocket science'. What is needed is for people to start thinking outside of the bureaucratic square.
@Mohit Patel No, in the tropics you get some 20 tropical storms a year or something along those lines. A few hurricanes. This is for the atlantic, I'm not entirely aware of the numbers for other regions, but the ocean is not lacking in rain.
But the actual requirement to be classified as a desert has to due with how much precipitation an area gets, per year. It's why Antartica is a desert. It almost never snows there. It's mainly just snow on the ground being picked up by the wind. Oceans however, get more than enough rain to not be classified as a desert.
That's a was a really nice video! I'm having classes in this quarentine time, and used this video to learn a little bit more. Thanks and congrats for the video!
The question I keep seeking an answer for is what would happen if we create artificial archipelagos of of underwater floating shelves within the euphotic zone which carry artificial coral reefs and other flora/fauna (as well as a base for floating cities/islands). Could sea life be able to hop over to the next shelf in the chain? Would it somehow mess up the eco-cycle?
We could put artificial places for life to settle. Sea life settles on trash, sculptures, the side of ships, you name it. The big obstacle would be keeping the plant life or plankton alive without sunlight. We would need to put in a sturdy long lasting sunlamp of some kind that also has a sufficiently small ecological foot print. Otherwise our floaties are stuck in the photic zone.
Floating wouldn't be ideal; as nutrients build up, it would sink. You'd need heavy pylons, with some sort of large durable net or lattice between them, as a starter medium for life to grow on.
@@breakthrough673 We put permanant sunlamps in the aphotic zone? I figured it was implied that we already put floaties out, both deliberately and otherwise.
I found something surprising in the three charts. The open ocean only has a productivity of 125g per square meter per year, yet according to chart three, accounts for a higher percentage of productivity than the tropical rain forest, which has productivity rate of 2,200g per square meter per year... Just shows you how truly vast the ocean really is that, at such a low productivity rate, there is so much of it that it produces more overall than any other ecosystem.
This got me thinking. What if we were to place heat sources in the cold/dark layer of unproductive parts of the ocean to create a circulation of nutrients flowing upward? What kind of effect could this have? Could it create little hotspots of productive ocean? What quantity of energy would it take to make any noticeable difference? Could the heat output from radioactive materials serve this purpose, similarly to how we harness the heat in fission power plants? Could we use wave energy to power electric heating elements?
This video taught me more about geology, oceanography, and meteorology in two minutes than my past twenty years of high-school and college combined. Subscribed!
One of the most densely packed educational videos I've seen. Amazing work. I rarely come away from these with anything I hadn't already known, but this one had more than a single wow moment for me.
Brazil is protecting. That is why we still have them. 84% of the brazilian amazon rainforest is untouched. Compare that with european or north american forests.
@@GregoXWK4225 Europe and the USA and Canada don't have rain forest, there is more tree coverage now then there were 50 years ago by the size of Alaska, yet there are less rain forest coverage, so stop blaming Westerners for everything.
@@GregoXWK4225 And those forest are getting larger and the rainforest are getting smaller. Also did you not watch the video, rainforest are vastly more productive then regular forest.
Some information you have in your videos are so important that I don't get why we haven't had them in the basic courses of High School here in Finland.
It could be that the Nile ends up in mediterranean sea which is almost cut off from the open ocean or that it needs to pass through egypt which is mostly a desert. But still, the egyptians managed to live there so the desert might not be as big as a factor.
@@LuddyFish_ The Egyptian civilization survived with the Nile river because of the predictable floods that the river made and with that they put their plantations in those areas so it could get a lot of water and grow faster. PS: Don't believe 100% in my explanation because i could easily misunderstood some of this things but the overall idea of why the Egyptians survived there was because of the flooding of the Nile river
the Horse without name beat you to that. After nine days I let the horse run free 'Cause the desert had turned to sea There were plants and birds and rocks and things there was sand and hills and rings The ocean is a desert with it's life underground And a perfect disguise above Under the cities lies a heart made of ground But the humans will give no love
Something to note: You pointed out that oceans cover the largest area, and account for the largest production, and point out that the production/area is very small. You know why it's small? Because the area is very large. .-. IMO the most accurate measure of productivity here seems to the percentage of total production, which correctly shows that the ocea produces more than almost every other biome combined.
Flawed video has skewed data and incorrect graphs lol these foos are just as bad as the flat earthers, im going to make a video debunking this bullshit lol ill probably get lots of dislikes just like how lots of people dislike my videos proving Earth is round!
@@MeganOHowe from a dictionary: des·ert 1 (dĕz′ərt) n. 1. A barren or desolate area, especially: a. A dry, often sandy region of little rainfall, extreme temperatures, and sparse vegetation. b. A region of permanent cold that is largely or entirely devoid of life. c. An apparently lifeless area of water. 2. An empty or forsaken place; a wasteland: a cultural desert. 3. Archaic A wild and uninhabited region. adj. 1. Of, relating to, characteristic of, or inhabiting a desert: desert fauna. 2. Wild and uninhabited: a desert island.
@Sollace no, it's not unproductive because it has a big area, it's unproductive because it has low production per area, the idea that a low production area is productive because it can brute force itself in to being the biggest producer is ludicrous
@@pedrolmlkzk You misunderstood. I'm not saying it's unproductive, in fact I believe it's actually _very_ productive, just that doesn't look like it because it's spread over such a large area. The video is incorrectly assuming that a low productivity per square meter automatically means it's less productive than the other reasons, but the a simple measure of _total_ productivity shows that's not actually the case. The oceans are one of the highest producers.
Atlas Pro you've done it again. But my favorite videos are the ones pertaining to earth during it's most recent ice age and how there are submerged cities below the wakes.
"I don't like sand. It's coarse and rough and irritating and it gets everywhere." -Anakin Skywalker, 2002 "I love water. It's wet and fluid and calming and it's splashes everywhere." -me, now
Nice video, very informative. One correction though, at 13:57, you mention river Bhramaputra with the largest delta area in the Indian subcontinent. River Bhramaputra with river Ganga (also called Ganges) together create the largest delta, the Sundarbans
This makes me think, if all that is limiting phytoplankton blooms is nutrients, all we would need is to seed these areas with nutrients capable of not sinking to colder waters. Is there not a nutrient type that could be dispersed but not sink in these warmer surface waters?
Unfortunately I don't not believe there is anything like this. Most nutrients need to be dissolved into the water for them to be accessible, and this makes the water more dense and therefore will always sink
A lot of the ocean lacks iron and simply spreading iron ore(very cheap and massive deposits around the world) causes the plankton to bloom incredibly quickly. It's one of the methods proposed for geoengineering as it is both cheap and easy to do and the increase in plankton causes fisheries to increase in productivity and also helps sequester carbon to the seafloor. Unfortunately this along with all other methods of geoengineering has been banned under UN conventions as the long term effects are unknown. My issue around the whole deal is mainly that if climate change is caused by CO2 increases and ocean seeding is one of the cheapest (indeed potentially profitable given the improved fisheries) ways to sequester carbon long term then why ban it, especially given that nothing currently proposed by any agreement will do anything more than delay climate change, not fix it. Of course lm highly sceptical of the whole climate change deal as you might have already figured out, but the arguments for it are very much on the same lines as colesterol with heart disease or animal fats with weight gain. Correlation does not equal causation, yet in all cases we are told there was consensus by a the experts (there never really was consensus on any but we were/are told there was).
@@Jake12220 you raise a very important question. And that's not the only example of people opposing a solution to climate change because it isn't "natural" enough. There is a strong consensus that nuclear energy is one of the best ways to quickly reduce carbon emissions but environmentalists and climate activists tend to reject or ignore it.
@@Jake12220 yes if you introduce nutrients to the desert part of ocean, it causes plankton boom but what kind of plankton? phytoplankton or zooplankton? If phytoplankton boom, that's good because they absorb carbon and become food for fisheries. If zooplankton boom happens, that's bad. Very,very bad because that means deprived o2 levels and dead zones. That's really a double edged sword.
@@Jake12220 your channel is pretty blank, so let me ask you something; what is it like to work for big energy? or do you not know because bots don't have feelings?
Oceans are a desert of water.. and Deserts are an ocean of sand
essentially!
Forests are glaciers of trees. Glaciers are forests of ice.
A city is a concrete jungle and the forest is a skyscraper of trees
they were in all history compared,
a camel was called the ship of the desert..
@@JeroenJA sounds delicious
I don't like sand. It's rough and coarse and irritating and it gets everywhere.
@Preston Newcomb Yes!
;)
Dry Water Maybe?!
Not soft, like you
Tell that to Dory
It's finally settled... Water is officially dry
water itself is dry though
Commie
@123 456 false liquid causes things to get wet not just water
Water has been property of the ccp since ancient times
I’ll not fall for your commie lies,
True Americans know the waters wet
So ships are camels of the ocean?
@@Cyb3rvision there is no technology that is "completely" clean, just be wise when using them. Banning them is dumb, exploiting them is despicable.
@@Cyb3rvision camels fart
Krok Krok who?
@@snowmanleblanc6053
Mate just sacrifice one for the greater good, *you should understand that*
X-Fun RIGHT! LET'S SACRIFICE NATURE FOR A GREATER GOOD
"I used the Patreon money to buy my groceries, so you know, I can stay alive"
I love this man's humour
i dont think he was joking
Yeah, I mean, who doesn’t have enough money to stay alive and do normal things
-boomers
@@halamadruuid2380 If he doesn't have any other jobs, youtube is his only income source.
@@halamadruuid2380 You're not gonna get 100k subs lol!
It was probably not humour...
I think I've found my next favourite geography channel
whats the other one
Wendover/HAI and RealLifeLore
So, it's not your current favourite, but your next favourite? I didn't know one could plan their tastes in advance like that.
I got more than one favourite ;)
@@TheBronzeSword reallifelore just plaigerizes posts from a few different subreddits, everyone in the vexillology and cartography subreddits thinks hes an ass because he just steals viral stuff from them and a few others, and doesnt give credit. its not that he just steals the idea, he just goes over what someone there says point for point with no additional researh or insight added. I liked him till he I found that out, and saw him do it
10:42 as a diver i can add up that you can actually feel and see when you crossed thermocline. Water becomes actually darker and you feel sudden cold. Idk, but i think differences can be 5 or so degrees in celcius.
“The ocean is a desert with it's life underground
And a perfect disguise above” - America
Cameron Hoglan That verse kept repeating in my head throughout the video, such a great song.
I came to the comments specifically looking to see if anybody else thought of this song when watching this video!
Right on✊
I been through the desert on a horse with no name, it felt good to be out of the rain.
Good to know I wasn't the only one to remember this. High five to all of you who did too.
My brother thought that "biomes" was only a Minecraft word 😂
same
I don't blame him tho...
I see he is a man of culture
So did I lol
Me too for a while
deserts are an important ecosystem as well let this not be overlooked. It takes most desert plants much longer to grow and they are all specially adapted over millions of years. Makes sense that they are not as productive for example as a deciduous forest. The silt and blowing sediments from deserts are the reason for productivity of the land down wind. Everything is connected. Love the videos!
Multi discipline and common sense. Some guy asked what’s his data source? As if there were one source. Many disciplines, education, curiosity and common sense.
Seeing the recommendation: "what an odd clickbait title"... 12 minutes later: "woah this is actually awesome, I learned so much!"
Frrrrr
@Archock Encanto are you stupid or what he probably knows more than your bird brain lookin ass
@Archock Encanto uff... this hurts. are you gonna tell us next that learning must be painful and thst work is inherently suffering? im a neuroscientist and engineer, have researched learning and written papers on learning improvements, stating that you cannot learn when expecting entertainment is crazy. the contrary is the case - we learn BEST when not expecting having to learn. entertainment in nearly every instance leads to highrr amounts of deep processing which connects more ideas together creating the associative memory - which has higher retrival rates and shows correlation with creative idea formation.
@Archock Encanto Ok listen buddy having a job doesn't make you smart most people around nowadays have no talent nor brains for example mumble rappers and is there a reason you aren't the main professor? oh wait guess you dont quality all you need to do is copy the professor and say the things he usually says to the students to get by.... Also whats wrong with an anime profile picture are you claiming that people with any sort of background that doesnt have a profile picture dumb? I think you make a perfect of example of the retarded teachers who don't know what they are teaching nowadays you guys are literally SCREWING UP THE NEXT GENERATION just so YOU CAN MAKE A LIVING
@Archock Encanto just because your dumbass has a job as a professor doesn't mean you are smart its like saying "I knew stephen hawking" that doesnt make you smart but this is what you are doing you are saying smart because you are affiliated to a genius
Wow I'm extremely impressed. I thought when you're video popped up it would be crap and click bate. ... But I stand corrected the content seems to be right up there with others like windover, second thought and CPG Grey
That's awesome that Wendover and Second Thought have gotten big enough to be mentioned in the same sentence as CGP Grey
@@_JayRamsey_ I suggest watching Wendovers geopolitical videos and then comparing then to a dedicated geopolitics channel like Caspianreports or Strategy stuff. It's a general trend in many of the 10-minute infotainment channels that they sometimes cover a topic in a somewhat shallow manner without declaring that it's covered in shallow manner.
That doesn't take away from them of course or mean that they are wrong, but sometimes it simplify topics more than it perhaps should to make them more appealing and shorter. Wendovers videos seem to often be a visual summary of an article or similiar, and i wish they would be more upfront about such things in the videos.
Sorry but this is leagues above them
Is a little bit click-bait as a desert is to do with rainfall rather than life, but I agree it's a great video
@@Vetle1580 Which is why Zepherus and WonderWhy are better quality than Wendover: they spend more time in research.
this video should be viral
Fingers crossed!
@@AtlasPro1 yeah
It is in a way, I never watched something from this channel and it's in my recommended.
Wait so that isnt?
@@Wikant18 nah i said when it was not
This is an absolutely fan-bloody-tastic video. Amazing. It gives me chills just how much I learned in this one video, even though I've spent the last half decade on RUclips learning about different aspects of our world. My next Patreon contribution is set. Subbed.
"The ocean is a desert with it's life underground, and a perfect disguise above"
-America, A Horse With No Name
Who needs RUclips videos I get all my info from light 70s rock.
Lou_Pit929 yeah, but according to reality it's not true because most of ocean bottom is empty. I hate this type of tv shows that tries hard to be smart.
Beat me to it!
@@LovelyAngel. I mean it's a song that really doesn't try to be smart. It has such lyrics as "the heat was hot". I like the song, but it has two chords and lazy lyrics. Don't think anyone would describe it as a smart song.
Wow this channel is so underrated, I came here a few days ago from the doggerland video and I was just blown away by your content, keep doing what you're doing :)
Thanks! More to come soon!
I came from the same video and I agree. This channel is truly something special
i have the same profile pic as u on my discord acount
holy shit, I didn't even notice this was the same channel as the Doggerland video xD I just happened to watch that one yesterday, and saw this today and thought "oh hey, I love the ocean, this should be neat"
When analyzing the three ecosystems graphs, i was suprised that swamp/marshlands where such highly productive zones - its 3rd in productivity! It intrigued me so I intended to research it afterwards. However I was HIGHLY impressed that as I continued watching the video, you mentioned the phenomon and expanded on it, far exceeding my expectations for the video and increasing my curiosity on the subject! I am absolutely amazed by this content and the research that I can't give it a high enough applause. AMAZING JOB
Sponges grow in the ocean. That cracks me up. Imagine how much deeper the ocean would be if that didn't happen
Climate change is killing sponges!!
@@futuregmchess1561 so that means more water
@@pumkin610 Yes that is where all that extra water is coming from!
lmao yeah if only real life sponges worked like minecraft sponges do...
but that water they absorb is still in the ocean as long as the sponge is in the ocean.
This is one of the best channels I have ever come aacross.
No long intros that aren't related to the video. Everything is interesting. Nice music and editing... Subscribed pap!
This should be part of an online course in Physical Geography
Geoffrey Zwegers online courses are so annoying tho
it is a part of Biogeography
I wonder where urban landscapes fall in terms of area and “productivity”
probably relatively low, as there isn't much producers in urban landscapes
From what, houseplants?
@@taritangeo4948 Would be some lawns as well. Though I imagine lawns are extremely low producers too
They're basically deserts too
" no" that's how much there is
This video is amazing. I've known for years that oceans are effectively deserts, but before now I've never been able to get a satisfying answer as to why. Your explanation was so clear and comprehensive; thank you for answering this really big, really important question I've been unable to find an answer for for years.
... so if we made MORE coral reefs we'd have even MORE productivity! LET'S GET TO WORK BOYS.
DJFlare84 you cant make coral reefs lol
We are, they're called "offshore wind farms". Well, maybe not specifically coral reefs. Many of them do grow mussel beds, I hear.
@@Mikasks Actually, there are people that build coral reefs for a living. They sink ships, use construction material, concrete, and other materials for barnacles, corals, and oysters to attach themselves to which in turn brings other sea life into the area. They even grow corals for these projects to seed the new reefs. It's hard to do especially in a hurricane-prone area of the ocean where the new corals are ripped off the ocean floor, but they keep trying and sometimes are successful. They may be man-made/artificial coral reefs, but they are coral reefs just the same.
Yeah, this probably work.
*look at recent marine biology papers regarding corals*
...10 years ago.
Cscape ooh I didn’t know that artificial reefs are a thing. That’s really cool, that might be the only way to do this.
"The ocean is a desert with its life underground and the perfect disguise above"
-America (The Band)
You should've written this on an emerald tablet.
Why doesn't the Nile create greater productivity where it lets out?
The Nile is home to one of the most intensive agricultural lands in the world. Going back thousands of years the Egyptians would capture its flood waters to allow nutrient-rich sediments to be deposited. An irrigation system like this persists to this day, reducing the total nutrients exiting the river through the delta. Without those nutrients, you're not going to have a spike in productivity.
@@AtlasPro1 Fascinating! So, then, we could potentially stop the sorts of mass die offs of fish from rivers dumping fertilizer into the ocean you talked about with a sufficiently advanced irrigation system?
It really depends on the river. For ones like the Amazon and Mississippi, it'd be more effective to stop stripping the land of its vegetation to stop erosion from draining all the nutrients away.
@@AtlasPro1 Makes sense! Thanks for the clarifications!
One of the unintended consequences of the Aswan High Dam was to stop the flow of nutrients from reaching the Nile River agricultural basin.
Incredible video! Just discovered the channel, I've been blown away by how informative and educational they are. This one in particular really puts a lot of things together. Thanks so much!
This totally reminds me of the first weeks of Marine Biology lol and you explain it so good in a short amount of time. My professor took the whole to explain the thermocline and all the cold water and the rivers dumping into the oceans. By the way it only took 2 videos to convince me to subscribe. KEEP IT UP!!!🐢
There's been some talk of plastic-eating bacteria, which makes me wonder about how the deployment of these will affect these nutrient zones. The deployment of these bacteria to places like "the garbage patch" will break down plastics, which is likely to create nutrients, which in turn could make less productive areas more productive.
“The ocean is a desert with its life underground and the perfect disguise above.” Some people will get this.
AND I HAVE A HORSE WITH NO NAME.
Gta san andreas, anyone?
"The ocean is a desert with it's life underground
And a perfect disguise above.
Under the cities lies a heart made of ground
But the humans will give no love"
I was totally gonna put this too!
ruclips.net/video/zSAJ0l4OBHM/видео.html
I think the lyric is "And the perfectest skies above." Which proves the lyric writer really was on a horse with no name.
@@ronaldgarrison8478 I think you're on drugs, mate.
@@logan_wolf Nowhere near as strong as the drugs needed to make that band America sound good.
Wonderful vid! Nice to see longer more informative ones :)
Thanks! I hope you liked seeing your name on screen!
@@AtlasPro1 Indeed. Keep up with the wonderful content!
_"Almost the same exact amount..."_
You've got that pretty much spot on, or precisely thereabouts. It's more or less perfect English.
2009: Deserts are sandy, dry and hot places
2018: Deserts are dry places where it doesn't rain
2022: The ocean is a desert
The river in india that you pointed out is the Ganges. Eventually it meets with the brahmaputra river in Bangladesh. This rich floodplain/swampland that is created is known as Bengal, one of the most productive, densely populated places on earth. It is home to the country Bangladesh (home to 160 million people) and the Indian state of West Bengal (home to around 90 million)
One of your greatest videos, keep it up!
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed!
Atlas Pro no, thank you for making the video
Guttentag
bUT WATER WET
No I'm not,I'm dehydrated!
Water wet
Water is NOT wet
Water is wet
Water is liquid
Geez. I minored in geography and heard most of these facts individually but wow.
Thank you🤗 me and my son are learning more with your videos. I hope you RUclips values your educative intentions to provide others. And always people like you be able to teach humanity to continue the pattern in a lifetime.
The independent measurement parameter is mass. While not wanting to rain on this xlnt parade, consider that coral productivity 3:42 is skewed by calcium (a heavy alkali metal) which the polyps capture to make their shells. By comparison, forests 4:05 capture carbon and oxygen (low-mass nonmetals) to make cellulose for their bodies. Coral biomes put a thumb on the scale with calcium carbonate. What would happen to the comparison by counting only the polyps' body mass alone? I suspect forests would pop up.
Yes, let's focus on the numbers to win a pissing match. Throw away the science that produced those numbers; you NEED to be RIGHT.
@@avabethmcghee3048 Not necessarily. Ecologists (on land, at least) often make a point of measuring bioproductivity by comparing biomass amounts only after they've literally de-hydrated all the water out -- "dry biomass fraction". That's because it can often be very hard to get good comparable measurements of plant, etc material; once you've "harvested" it in a form that makes it possible to weigh it, some dehydration is almost bound to happen, plus differing plant materials can have differing proportions of water in their natural state. So drying out all the water became one of the standards for coming up with these standardized measurements of biomass in an ecosystem. Trying to calculate biologically active material by only measuring the carbon involved is another strategy.
So Michie TN may have a good point. Anyone trying to come up with a solid method for comparing relative biological activity between two ecosystems can run into all sorts of interesting twists. In fact, figuring out how those twists change the meaning of previous and ongoing research is probably a pretty good way to earn a thesis or even a research career. Although I'd bet, even with some tweaks to allow for coral's use of calcium in their structures compared to say, trees -- they still are substantial contributor's to total biomass.
Scientists: 65% of earth is ocean
The dutch: I am gonna act like i didn’t see that
The Dutch: wow I never knew 64% of the world is ocean, 63% percent is so much *suspiciously pushes some more dirt in the ocean*
Actually it's Trump supporters who would disagree with that statement.
@@BallinNQnz REEE I hate Trump supporters, my wife left me for a trump supporter
@@Weeeeessel lmao
Noah Claus tuff but you got rid of a sicko atleast
There’s also plastic all in it.
Lots of plastic.
And the ocean is full of plastic~
@@Burn_Angel lets save the planet said everyone not knowing how to save the planet
Oceans are dessert, last time i tasted ocean, it was not sweet.
Nice video btw!
Thank you for mapping the interesting point, that nutrients are the limiting factor of productivity in the ocean.
One comments: The water flowing into the gulf of Bengal is only partly from the Brahmaputra. Much of the water is from the Ganges, and the indicated river bed is actually the Ganges.
The real limiting factors are the waves, the distance from bottom of ocean to surface, and density of atmosphere (the water) between the two.
@@threezysworld8089- how are the waves a limiting factors of life in ocean? And how is the density of water, which is nearly constant?
. . . As to the water depth: of course, nearly all ocean life is limited to the ocean, by definition, but that's a local constant, not a regulator.
@@Achill101 Much harder for life to settle anywhere as well as the density of water being the reason light can't penetrate deep enough.
@@threezysworld8089 - our exchange seems to be only an exchange about words and their meaning.
. . . "Density" is the ratio of mass to volume, in kg/m^3, that is nearly constant for seawater. You meant that life is mostly confined to that water where sun light reaches and photosynthesis happens, and that is correct, too.
. . . "Limiting factors" are parameters that change from locality to locality and on whose value another factor, here life activity, depends. Penetration of light into seawater, however, is nearly constant across the oceans - scientists would call it a "boundary condition" (which is fixed) not a limiting factor.
. . . But the supply of the oceans' top layers with nutrients varies a lot between locations, and it strongly impacts local life activity (more nutrients means more activity or productivity), which was the message of the video. That supply can be called the "limiting factor".
. . . Finally, could you explain, please, why you think the WAVES are an important factor? I don't see it now.
Can you help me explain the Nile river delta in Egypt.
Was thinking about that and I do the activity spike that you would expect
And the south and the Mediterranean sea also is odd.
I wonder if someone is gonna see this and get an appropriate answer
You make absolutely incredible videos considering your RUclips popularity especially views, perhaps do a collaboration so more people get to know you, its not that you don't deserve more but RUclips doesn't recommend you enough for the people wgo want this content.
Max H collab with RealLifeLore maybe?
I wholeheartedly agree! It is criminal that those shitty Buzzfeed channels have millions of subscribers while the content is complete garbage.
collab with pewdiepie
You, my good sir, have yourself a new subscriber.
glad to have you!
*Tries to dive into a pile of sand in a desert , gets stung by a scorpion*
*Dives into the ocean, gets stung by a jellyfish*
*ReVErsE UNo*
Yup everything checks out here for sure. Totally following all the definitions perfectly.
Angelo Pacia we have the same profile pic 😱
@@wackyduck3
You are WRONG.
Comparing the ocean to a desert is about SCARCITY OF LIFE.
"mountain" refers to a topographic profile.
Found your channel about a week ago and I love your content. I'm a huge fan of learning about our all types of things including spirituality, nature, science; things such as our planet, history, all types of life, space, etc it strongly interest me. Definitely agree that the ocean is a desert and I've believed that for many years. I haven't been able to check out many of your videos yet being I just found the channel but I will. This was a good one like the others and I especially appreciate topics of oceans and water in general but as I stated, i love the content I've seen thus far. Myself being an educator i also appreciate your willingness and desire to teach others through this channel. Much thanks bruh
"Oceans are deserts"
*Hmm yes, the floor is made of sky*
I'm something of a big sandy place with plants and animals as well
They are like yin and yang, one gives meaning to the other. In a way they are alike, a desert.
Humanity: Let's find Earth 2.0! We won't run out of anything we need.
*Earth 1.0 barren areas have entered the chat*
The ocean is a desert with its life underground, and the perfect disguise above.
-america, _a horse with no name_
The ocean is a desert with its life underground, and a perfect disguise above.
Firstly, let me say that this video is wonderfully informative - just like all the other Atlas Pro videos I have seen so far!
Secondly, it provokes the question of why we humans are not trying to create regions with lots of artificial upwellings which could significantly increase the biological productivity of the oceans. Beneficial outcomes of this would include: increased sequestration of CO2, reduction of the rate of ocean acidification, significant increase in fish stocks which could supply much needed protein for people, and could even be used to protect coral reefs from bleaching by keeping them cool so they don't overheat. As well as this, the size and power of tropical cyclones could be reduced by preventing the ocean surface from getting to much warmer in the areas where they are formed.
All the technology needed to do this on a vast scale already exists, because none of it is 'rocket science'. What is needed is for people to start thinking outside of the bureaucratic square.
Are you getting paid and monetized now?
His subscribers are over 700,000 and I had an ad at the start in the end of the video so I'm guessing yes.
Tundra is closer for comparison, only 15 g difference. While Semidesert to Open Ocean is 35. So oceans are actualy tundras.
A desert is somewhere that gets less than 10 inches of rain a year
Exactly.
@Mohit Patel Oceans have hurricanes.
@Mohit Patel No, in the tropics you get some 20 tropical storms a year or something along those lines. A few hurricanes. This is for the atlantic, I'm not entirely aware of the numbers for other regions, but the ocean is not lacking in rain.
On oceans rain happens rarely because clouds move faster than in-land. But also they are the hotspot for torrential rain that happen in short time
NILE delta isn't a desert, rainfall isn't the only source of water
But the actual requirement to be classified as a desert has to due with how much precipitation an area gets, per year. It's why Antartica is a desert. It almost never snows there. It's mainly just snow on the ground being picked up by the wind. Oceans however, get more than enough rain to not be classified as a desert.
That's a was a really nice video! I'm having classes in this quarentine time, and used this video to learn a little bit more. Thanks and congrats for the video!
7:05 what about the whole Baltic sea?? It’s super productive...
Hes not gonna circle everything
It's shallow
The question I keep seeking an answer for is what would happen if we create artificial archipelagos of of underwater floating shelves within the euphotic zone which carry artificial coral reefs and other flora/fauna (as well as a base for floating cities/islands). Could sea life be able to hop over to the next shelf in the chain? Would it somehow mess up the eco-cycle?
We could put artificial places for life to settle. Sea life settles on trash, sculptures, the side of ships, you name it. The big obstacle would be keeping the plant life or plankton alive without sunlight. We would need to put in a sturdy long lasting sunlamp of some kind that also has a sufficiently small ecological foot print. Otherwise our floaties are stuck in the photic zone.
i was thinking of the same thing! :D
why don't we create some sort of floating platform where the plants will grow below it
Floating wouldn't be ideal; as nutrients build up, it would sink. You'd need heavy pylons, with some sort of large durable net or lattice between them, as a starter medium for life to grow on.
@@breakthrough673
We put permanant sunlamps in the aphotic zone? I figured it was implied that we already put floaties out, both deliberately and otherwise.
@@breakthrough673
I figured I'd implied that already. My bad. Surface areas still aren't really the issue though, not that deep
Eyy!!! You made it to 13k subs!! Congratulations!!!!
16,000 this morning, and growing at a ridiculous rate!
39 K now 😯😲 btw I'm a new subscriber from yesterday 😆
I found something surprising in the three charts. The open ocean only has a productivity of 125g per square meter per year, yet according to chart three, accounts for a higher percentage of productivity than the tropical rain forest, which has productivity rate of 2,200g per square meter per year... Just shows you how truly vast the ocean really is that, at such a low productivity rate, there is so much of it that it produces more overall than any other ecosystem.
This got me thinking. What if we were to place heat sources in the cold/dark layer of unproductive parts of the ocean to create a circulation of nutrients flowing upward? What kind of effect could this have? Could it create little hotspots of productive ocean? What quantity of energy would it take to make any noticeable difference? Could the heat output from radioactive materials serve this purpose, similarly to how we harness the heat in fission power plants? Could we use wave energy to power electric heating elements?
Technically it doesn't rain inside the water of the ocean. Well played.
Can we talk about cavern desert grams of life now?
Great video as always!!
Thanks :)
Atlas Pro if you need ideas for your next video, I’ve got one. How did Britain get its name?
Fire is cold.
Light is dark.
And I'm not depressed.
And my female parent doesn't live the life of a whore.
EU citizens are very happy with the recent developments.
And diversity is our strength.
i aM a dOg .
Jk I am a hooman
James Smith no i am a dog
This video taught me more about geology, oceanography, and meteorology in two minutes than my past twenty years of high-school and college combined. Subscribed!
Gotta say, this video was way cooler and more informative than I expected from the title. Great video!
I swear you had 98k subscribers yesterday
Addisonia Corp no it was like 37k
One of the most densely packed educational videos I've seen. Amazing work. I rarely come away from these with anything I hadn't already known, but this one had more than a single wow moment for me.
“Rainforests should be protected “ tell that to Brazil.
jodimontoute why
Brazil is protecting. That is why we still have them. 84% of the brazilian amazon rainforest is untouched. Compare that with european or north american forests.
@@GregoXWK4225 Europe and the USA and Canada don't have rain forest, there is more tree coverage now then there were 50 years ago by the size of Alaska, yet there are less rain forest coverage, so stop blaming Westerners for everything.
@@L0rd0fLight1 Stop being cynical. They are the accusers, not we. And I never said they have RAIN forests. They have other kinds of forests.
@@GregoXWK4225 And those forest are getting larger and the rainforest are getting smaller. Also did you not watch the video, rainforest are vastly more productive then regular forest.
Except "desert" is defined by how much annual rainfall a location gets, not by how productive the life in that location is.
Now what would be interesting is if you were to overlay the productivity map over a ocean depth map
Ocean is wet Desert 💙 and the Sandy Desert is dry Desert 💛
5:19 Despite making up 13%...
BeryAb
28/1
The ocean is a desert with its life underground and the perfect disguise above.
from "A Horse With No Name"-America
I like that texture pattern you used as a background, it's bringing me back to the Apple desktop patterns of my childhood in the mid-90s
Some information you have in your videos are so important that I don't get why we haven't had them in the basic courses of High School here in Finland.
My geographic lesson in my school but more complex
Minecraft Oceans Before 1.13
Wow, your videos are so proffesional and interesting, even though you only have 13000 subs. You should have like a million subs
so i think his channel just started the "exponential growth phase". One day later he has already 21k subs.
Scotland looking kinda beautiful from space in that first shot
6:00 thought there was something on my screen and tried wiping it off
Me too xD
Yes me too tried to wipe it off, It's fishing net I think or something like that to catch 🐟
Why doesn't the river Nile produce the same effect as the ones you mention?
Perhaps because it was farmed for ten thousand years at least?
I am pretty sure is because the Nilo ends in the Mediterranean sea, and the rest of thise rivers ends in Oceans
It could be that the Nile ends up in mediterranean sea which is almost cut off from the open ocean or that it needs to pass through egypt which is mostly a desert. But still, the egyptians managed to live there so the desert might not be as big as a factor.
@@LuddyFish_ The Egyptian civilization survived with the Nile river because of the predictable floods that the river made and with that they put their plantations in those areas so it could get a lot of water and grow faster.
PS: Don't believe 100% in my explanation because i could easily misunderstood some of this things but the overall idea of why the Egyptians survived there was because of the flooding of the Nile river
Probably because all the nutrients get taken up by the delta.
Loved it
glad to hear it!
the Horse without name beat you to that. After nine days I let the horse run free
'Cause the desert had turned to sea
There were plants and birds and rocks and things
there was sand and hills and rings
The ocean is a desert with it's life underground
And a perfect disguise above
Under the cities lies a heart made of ground
But the humans will give no love
The ocean is a desert with its life underground.
Something to note:
You pointed out that oceans cover the largest area, and account for the largest production, and point out that the production/area is very small. You know why it's small? Because the area is very large. .-.
IMO the most accurate measure of productivity here seems to the percentage of total production, which correctly shows that the ocea produces more than almost every other biome combined.
Flawed video has skewed data and incorrect graphs lol these foos are just as bad as the flat earthers, im going to make a video debunking this bullshit lol ill probably get lots of dislikes just like how lots of people dislike my videos proving Earth is round!
@@MeganOHowe from a dictionary:
des·ert 1 (dĕz′ərt)
n.
1. A barren or desolate area, especially:
a. A dry, often sandy region of little rainfall, extreme temperatures, and sparse vegetation.
b. A region of permanent cold that is largely or entirely devoid of life.
c. An apparently lifeless area of water.
2. An empty or forsaken place; a wasteland: a cultural desert.
3. Archaic A wild and uninhabited region.
adj.
1. Of, relating to, characteristic of, or inhabiting a desert: desert fauna.
2. Wild and uninhabited: a desert island.
@Sollace no, it's not unproductive because it has a big area, it's unproductive because it has low production per area, the idea that a low production area is productive because it can brute force itself in to being the biggest producer is ludicrous
@@pedrolmlkzk You misunderstood. I'm not saying it's unproductive, in fact I believe it's actually _very_ productive, just that doesn't look like it because it's spread over such a large area.
The video is incorrectly assuming that a low productivity per square meter automatically means it's less productive than the other reasons, but the a simple measure of _total_ productivity shows that's not actually the case. The oceans are one of the highest producers.
@@Sollace and I'm saying it's unproductive because it produces little for the *amount* of area it has
None of y’all have ever listened to a horse with no rain, my mans knew decades ago
Atlas Pro you've done it again. But my favorite videos are the ones pertaining to earth during it's most recent ice age and how there are submerged cities below the wakes.
This is like a Research Paper video. I really think that Research Papers in the future should be replaced by videos such as this one.
Great work !
The atmosphere is an ocean of gas
It is actually a dessert as there is precious little net productivity in the atmosphere.
@@mafarmerga As this video has demonstrated, the two aren’t mutually exclusive
"I don't like sand. It's coarse and rough and irritating and it gets everywhere."
-Anakin Skywalker, 2002
"I love water. It's wet and fluid and calming and it's splashes everywhere."
-me, now
By definition yea, realistically no. The desert is more like an ocean.... an ocean of sand.
i have to be at work in 4 hours..
*"oceans are deserts"*
What do you do?
PuzzleMessage suffer
What is your picture and why are there so many people with the same one?
SAME rip
286 K subs as of 15th June 2019
Nice video, very informative. One correction though, at 13:57, you mention river Bhramaputra with the largest delta area in the Indian subcontinent. River Bhramaputra with river Ganga (also called Ganges) together create the largest delta, the Sundarbans
And all this water came from space. That’s something I can’t wrap my head around.
It's like it you kept throwing ice cubes in a pool for 4.5 billion years, best way to understand it
Me: Clears ocean with dry sponges in Minecraft
Me again: this video
This makes me think, if all that is limiting phytoplankton blooms is nutrients, all we would need is to seed these areas with nutrients capable of not sinking to colder waters. Is there not a nutrient type that could be dispersed but not sink in these warmer surface waters?
Unfortunately I don't not believe there is anything like this. Most nutrients need to be dissolved into the water for them to be accessible, and this makes the water more dense and therefore will always sink
A lot of the ocean lacks iron and simply spreading iron ore(very cheap and massive deposits around the world) causes the plankton to bloom incredibly quickly. It's one of the methods proposed for geoengineering as it is both cheap and easy to do and the increase in plankton causes fisheries to increase in productivity and also helps sequester carbon to the seafloor. Unfortunately this along with all other methods of geoengineering has been banned under UN conventions as the long term effects are unknown.
My issue around the whole deal is mainly that if climate change is caused by CO2 increases and ocean seeding is one of the cheapest (indeed potentially profitable given the improved fisheries) ways to sequester carbon long term then why ban it, especially given that nothing currently proposed by any agreement will do anything more than delay climate change, not fix it.
Of course lm highly sceptical of the whole climate change deal as you might have already figured out, but the arguments for it are very much on the same lines as colesterol with heart disease or animal fats with weight gain. Correlation does not equal causation, yet in all cases we are told there was consensus by a the experts (there never really was consensus on any but we were/are told there was).
@@Jake12220 you raise a very important question. And that's not the only example of people opposing a solution to climate change because it isn't "natural" enough. There is a strong consensus that nuclear energy is one of the best ways to quickly reduce carbon emissions but environmentalists and climate activists tend to reject or ignore it.
@@Jake12220 yes if you introduce nutrients to the desert part of ocean, it causes plankton boom but what kind of plankton? phytoplankton or zooplankton? If phytoplankton boom, that's good because they absorb carbon and become food for fisheries. If zooplankton boom happens, that's bad. Very,very bad because that means deprived o2 levels and dead zones. That's really a double edged sword.
@@Jake12220 your channel is pretty blank, so let me ask you something; what is it like to work for big energy? or do you not know because bots don't have feelings?