Revenue Sharing Is Necessary in College Athletics But Not Employment for Athletes | CFB
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 мар 2024
- David Smoak, Paul Catalina, and Craig Smoak discuss their thoughts on former Alabama head coach Nick Saban comments surrounding the landscape of college football, their thoughts on NIL and impact that has on all college athletics, and more.
With Craig Smoak, David Smoak, & Paul Catalina 
Развлечения
If it was done the way NIL is supposed to work, schools shouldn’t be involved at all. Players should get a share of the revenue from tv contracts for using their NAME, IMAGE, and LIKENESS on screen.
I don’t see how you get around making them employees with collective bargaining to structure it.
2 words...."Collective" "Bargaining"
For most schools, Two words: “No” “Sports”
For most schools, Two words: “No” “Sports”
Dartmouth basketball loses a million dollars a year. Do players want to share in the loss? Then an easy way to save money is since the athletes don’t care about the learning, no more need for sports at most schools.
@@DavidM442 | I'm cool with that... playing sports is a privilege.. not a right.
Nick "cares"... Strange thing is I haven't heard him so much positive about the players getting theirs now. Saban seems to be anti-NIL.
No. Coaches aren’t supposed to be handling the finances of the students. That’s not what NIL was for. Coaches should not be asked how much money they are getting paid to play for their school because it’s not supposed to be up to them.
If college football players are employees of the college then I see no way that they can be required to also be students. Professors do not have to be students, janitors do not have to be students, secretaries do not have to be students, etc. Once athletes are declared to be employees, I expect professionals who couldn't make it in the NFL will sue to be eligible to play on what are clearly professional teams sponsored by colleges/universities.
this can be all Handled in a Unionized Players agreement with the Conferences .. all part of the Contract ..the Colleges Don't want to PAy for something like this SO begging for Govt LAws to Save them Money
This is not even remotely close to reality. These this thing called the NCAA Clearinghouse. Athletes still must be students my guy. Then there's this thing called "eligibility"
@@shallojalloh ncaa ?
@jacenkun2931 | I know right. The schools are still under the authority of the nccaa clearinghouse. Tht ncaa sets the eligibility requirements..
Collective bargaining? Yea, how did that work for Detroit?
NIL is okay as long as the money is not coming from the university. If alumni and businesses want to invest in players, that's admissible.
Student Athletes should not be employees.
Revenue sharing shouldn't be with athletes but all students by using the revenue to make education more affordable for everyone. Non athlete students spend a lot of money supporting their teams.