Sir why we need to allow pin connection in rcc beam to give deflection in beam and it is not good..?? infact we have fixed beam means full development length in column and its stronger also so why we need pinned conection by providing less ld lentgh..🤔 and does pinned conection in rcc is called shear conenection..??
there may be many instances, like if the secondary beam is supported over primary beam, and if you fix it, it will develop torsion in primary beam. It's not good ...
@@EZ-Structure.Design.Learning sir i dont know why you compare rcc concreat member with steel member either concreat is made for fixed moment and rigid conections ..as you say in case of secondary beam resting on primary beam with fix conection with full ld length is not good because it create torsion and band on primary beam deu to moment conection😞 so sir i think you forget that the secondary and tertiary beams in concreat is using wold wide with full ld lentgh conections and you also forget that the primary beam is much powerfull than secondary beam and the secondary beam is much power full than tertiary beam and the column is much powerfull then all the types of beam to resist lateral bending compresion bulking load etc and the footing is much powerfull than all the other members like beam column etc...((so sir your concept of not to providing fixed moment conection in column from rcc beam beacause column cant take moment load and its will fail beacause its not design to take moment of beam)) ...i dont like your concept because there is no engineer who provide less stronger column compare to beam wich column cant take moment ..reply plz
@@aliqadri4672 I think even a well designed column can fail if a well designed ‘fixed’ beam support is overloaded by seismic up and down loading that transfers negative moments (in addition to other mixed forces in earthquakes) to the column which may cause it to catastrophically buckle and break. There is still a lot of debate with using pinned or fixed support systems in earthquake protection, reason why new techniques such as dampening and isolation of the foundations are being studied. Just my 2c.
@@liboy9844 your concept is right but i think pin conection is good in steel frames but not in rcc beam and column is not good because it show's cracks in column beam joint and in earthquack the pinned conected beam cant tie and hold up the columns and go fail due to bulking ..?
@@aliqadri4672 Yes I agree with you 100% ...pin connections can be catastophic when applied to concrete (rcc) because they are brittle. Fixed or restrained is best for concrete in my opinion. Cheers.
Great sir very Comprehensive, One question. If you have an adjacent beam, but still you want to release both beams does this concept still applicable? thanks
It was once done in Nigeria, if we do it again, we will inform you... Plz leave you email addres on whatsap +91-9825106264 or satish.jethwani@ez-engineers.com
Very well explained, well done
Sir you are just fire 🔥 thank u .pls explain end release concept of secondary beam
ي جدع ع الطلاق بالتلاته الله ينور عليك
ده احنااا طلعنااا تعبانين اوووووي
Thank you sir. Well explained.
Very well explained sir . What if we have a beam size of 600mm and 12mm dia bars at top. Does the development length (50 dia) remains same ?
if fixed, then yes.. if pinned then 50/3 x dia (approx)
@@EZ-Structure.Design.Learning ok sir thanku
Great 👍👍👍
Please, do you have online training courses for Reinforced concrete design?
No dear.
for further info - you can call/whatsap us on
+91-635 935 0500 or +91-98251 06264 or
just send "hi" @ whatsap +91-98251 06264.
Sir why we need to allow pin connection in rcc beam to give deflection in beam and it is not good..?? infact we have fixed beam means full development length in column and its stronger also so why we need pinned conection by providing less ld lentgh..🤔 and does pinned conection in rcc is called shear conenection..??
there may be many instances, like if the secondary beam is supported over primary beam, and if you fix it, it will develop torsion in primary beam. It's not good ...
@@EZ-Structure.Design.Learning sir i dont know why you compare rcc concreat member with steel member either concreat is made for fixed moment and rigid conections ..as you say in case of secondary beam resting on primary beam with fix conection with full ld length is not good because it create torsion and band on primary beam deu to moment conection😞 so sir i think you forget that the secondary and tertiary beams in concreat is using wold wide with full ld lentgh conections and you also forget that the primary beam is much powerfull than secondary beam and the secondary beam is much power full than tertiary beam and the column is much powerfull then all the types of beam to resist lateral bending compresion bulking load etc and the footing is much powerfull than all the other members like beam column etc...((so sir your concept of not to providing fixed moment conection in column from rcc beam beacause column cant take moment load and its will fail beacause its not design to take moment of beam)) ...i dont like your concept because there is no engineer who provide less stronger column compare to beam wich column cant take moment ..reply plz
@@aliqadri4672
I think even a well designed column can fail if a well designed ‘fixed’ beam support is overloaded by seismic up and down loading that transfers negative moments (in addition to other mixed forces in earthquakes) to the column which may cause it to catastrophically buckle and break. There is still a lot of debate with using pinned or fixed support systems in earthquake protection, reason why new techniques such as dampening and isolation of the foundations are being studied. Just my 2c.
@@liboy9844 your concept is right but i think pin conection is good in steel frames but not in rcc beam and column is not good because it show's cracks in column beam joint and in earthquack the pinned conected beam cant tie and hold up the columns and go fail due to bulking ..?
@@aliqadri4672
Yes I agree with you 100% ...pin connections can be catastophic when applied to concrete (rcc) because they are brittle. Fixed or restrained is best for concrete in my opinion. Cheers.
Great sir very Comprehensive, One question. If you have an adjacent beam, but still you want to release both beams does this concept still applicable? thanks
generally not. The bars will go continuous often.
G+3 building me fixed beam use karte hai ya simply supported
It has nothing to do with number of storeys
@@EZ-Structure.Design.Learning floor beam dono column me compress hone ko vajah se vo fix hoga ya nhi
Great, ❤️❤️
thanks for the compliments.
Great sir.
thank you for appreciation dear
Sir any online course on structural design concepts
Steel
RCC
Connections
Sasikumar
designersasikumar@gmail.com
8589070815
@@sasikumartherayil9620 online is not worth it bro...you can't do online
Bestest ever
Great explmation
Great explanation
@@sasikumartherayil9620 thanks for the appreciation dear..
min connections content in structural concrete???
Well explained
Is the course available for Nigeria
It was once done in Nigeria, if we do it again, we will inform you...
Plz leave you email addres on
whatsap +91-9825106264 or
satish.jethwani@ez-engineers.com
sir , Ld/3 for pinned connection any reference code.
practical value i think, not in code
Sir what is the basic deflection limit value for FIXED beam?
I am hungry about this thing
RCC or Steel?
@@EZ-Structure.Design.Learning
Sir rcc
And how can we design rcc structure manually
Rcc sir
do you offer online courses?
no dear
if you've designed it as pinned the beam will be stiffer to not bend and hence moment will not be transferred.
I don't think so.
Please watch this video, to create better understanding.
ruclips.net/video/s6NlqFSlQRw/видео.html&ab_channel=EZENGINEERSPVTLTD
Do you have online trainings? Im not from india but interested.
Please connect with us on call/whatsap
@ +91-9825106264