As a Western European, I perfectly agree with Poles. But don't mistake the EU for the people of Western Europe, which are also increasingly fed up with the ideology in Brussels. Hopefully we can reverse this universalist/liberal ideology without destroying the political union altogether...
I'm Danish. If, as you say, Denmark have the strictest immigration policies in the western world, things look extremely bad for the west. Because situation with immigration in Denmark is very far from rosy !
I now live in Copenhagen, but travel from time to time through Berlin. It is a stark contrast in favor of Danes. And keep in mind that Capitols are always the worst cases. There are things that locals could complain about, but I do not hear nor experience anything dramatic. Like in Sweden.
Some of you seem to miss my point. Some of you kinda say it yourself, between the lines; Denmark have some problems, but other countries have greater problems ... As if that would negate the Danish problems. Anyway, my actual point is: West is sold, if Denmark is top of the pack.
I think another factor that contributes to Denmark’s harsh immigration policy is because Copenhagen is basically right next to Malmö Sweden. Danes get the front row seats to witness the shit show on the other side every time LMAO
Poor Swedes having to seek refugee in København 😂 Malmö is the epitome of white flight, less than 45% are natives Swedes there and their imported engineers, doctors make up of the cities 20-25% unemployment rate combined with an awful economy.
I'm Australian who is moving to odense next week (also grandparents are norwagian) I remembered going to malmo for the first time from Copenhagen, couldn't be happier to be back in Denmark. Also worked in Northern Sweden, they said scandia can go back to Denmark 😂
Official: "You're being deported. If you don't tell us where are you really from, you'll be deported to Denmark." Migrant: "Well, OK.. I don't care." Official: "To Denmark - Greenland specifically. In the middle of it." Migrant: *shocked* "Erm, I'm from Nigeria."
@@bornstar481 The concept of human rights is a Liberal concoction, with no basis in reality. The only rights we have are those God-given, and each comes with responsibilities.
@@elianes5505Yes, if you completely ignore that I stated the importance of God-given rights. Also, I'm not sure history is your friend here, considering the post-enlightenment humanist paradigm has led to some of the worst atrocities in history, including the French Revolution, Russian Revolution and Mao's "Great Leap Forward".
You didn't mention that it's nearly impossible to obtain citizenship in Gulf states, whereas in most European countries, you may naturalize within merely few years. Having in mind migration crisis is a decade old problem, most of these refugees have already became citizens. How does a country deport its own citizens? This is completely different in Gulf states where your residency may always get cancelled for whatsoever reasons...
The only way for Europeans to survive as ethnicities is to develop a strong ethnic consciousness: gather into communities, reclaim our traditions, build healthy and large families etc. It will increasingly happen as we turn a minority in our own lands, but our survival as peoples hinges on how strongly and quickly we gain this sense of community.
European isnt an ethnicity. Danish, german, english, flemish, walloons, french is an ethnicity. These ethnicities may have a shared european identity but that doesnt make european an ethnicity
Europeans do have strong ethnic consciousness. The problems is their dysfunctional and counterproductive traditions. The tradition of excessive materialism and individuality, obsession with hedonism and anti-social/anti-family culture. Why not changing the culture rather than clinging to a failed/dysfunctional one?!
In Denmark nationalist gained power in 2001 and successfully moved the Overton window to the point where even left wing mainstream parties now have to give at least platitudes towards nationalism. Nobody in Denmark talks of diversity as a strength, yet things are far from ideal. We need much more action to solve the problems caused by unhinged migration, but at least we can talk openly about it being a problem here.
@@wezzuh2482 that's the refreshing thing, that is the youth of our generation, but Alex Vanopslagh, the new chairman of the Danish libertarian party is very popular, especially on ticktock. He have inspired untold thousands to the cause, they gained 9% in the last election and shows no sign of stopping
@@wezzuh2482 also, remember, you cannot stop an idea whose time have come. Nationalism just moved Denmark first because Denmark have usually always been on the forefront, other nations who struggle more against it are going to have a rougher time adopting to the new times
@RedOne-ib1me It is certainly true that no country stays great forever. the history of Denmark is mostly about a country that stayed graceful in defeat. A thousand years ago we were one of the primer powers of the world, conqueror of England, founder of Russia, discoverer of America, but one thing that stays constant and if universally true, is that every country is a reflection of its people. The Danes are the indigenous people of Denmark, what is immoral is surrendering our ancestral homeland due to a warped political view of self righteous moral superiority. An ideology that exist only in the west, as no one else is dumb enough to surrender the most precious and holy in order to "look good" in front of people that they don't even like. Look at Japan. When I said that Denmark are mainstreaming nationalism, I meant it as a sign of pride. We are better then Sweden, because they have only recently started to see the problem and take action against it, who are again better the Germany, whose nationalist party the AfD is still looked at with scorn rather then admired, who are again better then Ireland who don't even have a nationalist party. But nationalism is an idea whose time have come. Every country will embrace it, every country will in time take the corrective actions necessary to purge the poison of globalism and multiculturalism that have infected them, the question is how serious these actions have to be, and that depends on how early they started to take corrective action. Compare it to a car racing towards a brick wall. If we step on the breaks early, we might entirely avoid the wall or at least just gently bump into it. But if we keep pressing the accelerator even with airbags we might not make it when we crash
Like KaiserBauch, migrants from Africa would even accept slave-like conditions in Saudi Arabia than to remain in their countries. Even without those 1000 euros per month they wouldn't go away
European countries won´t have to restort to forceful remigration. Once enough of the native population becomes hostile and all social benefits are cut in that country, many to most of migrants will move to a different european country. That way, there will be one or two "sacrificial lamb" countries, most probably Britain or Sweden which would get overrun by non-Europeans, and other European nations will empty their migrants there.
bingo. all the far right people ive met are more obssesed about immigrants but most dont have any kids of their own they are part of the problem, even the far right parties in my country almost all the people in leadership positions dont have any kids
@IceSpiceNationalist wrong its by the 3rd generation that birth rates are similar to native population not 2nd, immigrant women in sweeden birth rate is almost at 2 but native sweedish is at 1.6
That’s a global problem but unlimited immigration is worsening it in the west. We’d have sustainable family policies by now if companies were left to suffer the lack of a workforce. Suddenly single people would earn less than married couples and married couples without children would make less than married couples with kids etc. companies would pay people more per child to increase fertility until the birth rate is sustainable again. The average European is 50 the companies would have to do this to fix their worker shortage or else they’d perish or move to the US. Japanese companies moved to the US but even American birth rates are in decline. The U.S. can’t save European and Japanese companies from a worker shortage. We’d only delay the inevitable (a wage increase for labor). If we got rid of the unlimited immigration and put on tariffs then wages could increase and so would the birthrate
The problem is, if you left the companies to fix it by not importing workers, the companies won't pay natives more, they'd simply move to wherever their companies to wherever it's more profitable. That'd be even worse. Immigrants(not refugees) are a net positive in all but 3 european countries. It's understandable why migration rates are so high though there's a need to slow it down to sure societal stability
"techno-feudalism" You mean like those tech companies who provide housing, amenities, food, entertainment, transportation, and security as part of their compensation, like a lord or a king would provide for his skilled workers?
I have a couple objections: 1. I don't think that most people talking about "remigration" even consider doing this through liberal institutions or, frankly, any form of government that is not an authoritarian fashist ic state. 2. People get rarely what they vote vor: the German SPD voter never really chose mass Emigration, Germans in 1933 did not think that Hitler would actually start killing all the jews, most protestors in 1979 Iran did not think that they are electing a totalitarian theocracy... Once people come to power, especially if through authoritarian means, they assume a life on their own.
You are right about people rarely getting what they vote for, but you also have to consider who would benefit from a mass deportation event. It certainly wouldn't be the people who own the economy, and I don't foresee anti-immigration people gathering the resources needed to replace the local elites before getting crushed.
The nsdap is a special case coming into power during great flux, chaos and societal issues. Furthermore, Hitler was driven massively by ideology, most of it being made public in his hundreds of speeches and in Mein Kampf, which does detail the plans for elimination of Jews and conquest of the east. We are very far from any of that in modern times, thankfully.
Remigration will happen in the case that there is a government willing to pursue that policy. The problem is that there doesn't seem to be any as of yet or any time soon. But it's completely possible. Just like millions of Europeans descendants living in North Africa until the 1950s and 1960s that were expelled or returned home, we can make them go home as well, even if they've been here for generations.
Oh yes, very possible. It's not like these countries were military dictatorships at the time and their governments and populations hated the colonizers. Very possible to copy this same system in Europe, trust me bro.
The fundamental mistake in these is thinking that anyone has the intention of solving these problems through the institutions who made them. This is like responding to the prospect of socialism in 1890's Russia by saying 'I'm not sure the emperor would do that, and he has support from state institutions, the orthodox church and peasants, like 80% of the population of Russia are peasants, nothing will happen, this is all because people are overly within their revolutionary movements'.
Under the scenario that you're implying, millions would die from the chaos in Europe and whatever third-world country they'd be deported into. As far fetched as this seems, the rise of AI is making labor borderline worthless, so there's a real chance that in the mass layoffs which are to occur, the host European populations will turn against the foreigners as everyone tries to get jobs and resources in a post-labor economic system. Let's hope all of this is resolved peacefully.
I am only implying because of this platform, significant disturbances are already taking place, it will be a long process but it will in no respect be peaceful. But some peace 's are unendurable, the one in South Africa for example.
@@Geen-jv6ck How will AI make labour worthless? Only essentially useless desk jobs are under threat, which albeit a large proportion of jobs today, are not everything.
@@chico9805accountants are not a “useless desk job”, lawyers are not a “useless desk job”, computer programmers are not a “useless desk job”. Many of our most important industries are under attack by AI. HR girlies are a useless desk job but they’ll be spared layoffs due to legal requirements. Programmers and engineers aren’t useless. Those are tough degrees to study and they’re facing massive job losses right now
@@chico9805The thing is the majority of people would be jobless as most white collar jobs are done away with and there would be far fewer jobs available than people unemployed. Obviously blue collar jobs exist but, again, there would be more ppl who need jobs than jobs available.
Foreigners had been in the Roman army since it's founding.Even Italians were seen as non romans in the early reoublic and they fought a war for attaining citizenship. Rome fell when the Barbarians didn't want Rome's culture but only it's gold. And that's what is happening to Europe today. The inmigrants dont CARE about european culture. They're just there to reap the most benefits they can.
Demographic change is not permanent. If you make life very very uncomfortable for the invaders they will leave. They will leave. If you apply affirmative action against them, because it is being done in other lands. It is a matter of will.
@@gmodrules123456789 if you take hard measures against those who turn to crime then it might encourage others to leave. It’s all a matter of what specific decisions are made
We need to repopulate our nations with ourselves. Ultimately birthrate is more important than where people are. As long as we have resources and own land, we have everything we need to raise our fertility.
Dont forget the women. They dont like reproduction any more since the „revolutionary“ 1960/70s. There is no propaganda for children, the subsidies are too low and no religious or whatever mental control. The suicidal „liberal“ system of the West praises absurd heights of individualism, anarchy, no respect for anything but laughable and dumb vulgar „self expression“. „Be different, whatever it takes“. Its insanity and means very quick collective DEATH.
There are two issues which you did not take into consideration. 1) A single european state may become radical enough to do a expulsion of foreign elements. Considering that its neighbours would be modern liberal states, they would be unwilling to use military force (and even if willing the nationalist nations could use its position to aid the illiberal world). Such a state could remove it forcing population into the neighboring states with force. It would also be extremely unattractive for people to stay in due to their non-citzen status and hostile attitude against them 2) the Russian people of the early 1900s did not want Bolshevism, yes they may have wanted socialism in some kind but not the atheist anti-peasant bolsheviks. Yet that is what they got. The people may not want a total restoration of native demographic dominance, but they may get it anyways. All that is needed is one state to follow the correct ideals, and eventually this state could liberate the rest of Europe from replacement and mongrelisation.
This is rather wishful thinking than solid arguments. The second is still somewhat better, but even if some contemporary european state would have such extremists subset and big enough to take control. It would more likely lead to straight up ethnic cleansing instead of force re-emigration. But even we assume they will try all the logistic issues raised in the video are still in play and suggest failure and possibly risk of resurgence.
@@Hunter-Biden-Official Russia isn't migrant-free, however, all of the migrants they do let in are from post-USSR/Tsarist Russia states and hence, loyal citizens.
Most migrants from the Gulf States have not entered these countries illegally, so their country of origin is clear as their passports are confiscated upon entry from their place of work. So there wasnt a way for Yemen, Ethopia etc. to deny that this are their citzens. Moreover, there are still a large number of migrants in the Gulf states, the deportations were more of a "refresher", replacing old migrants with new ones so that they cannot organise politically. The economy of the Gulf States is almost 100% dependent on these migrants, and an actual mass deportation without new arrivals would lead to the implosion of the economy. You have allready seen what happened after brexit in UK without even any mass deportations but just a stop of new ones from EU countries.
@@kv4648 yes they are. albanians and romanians left greece after covid and there was such a labour shortage the right wing goverment had to legalize illegal immigrants living in the country in order for them to work in farms since so much of the harvest was about to go to waste, so many young greeks have left the country. the goverment is depending on immigrants for a big chunk of the labour force
Not true...first only in saudi illegels passed through Yamen, some of them ethiopian who work illlegely and were deported...other deportee are workers who work for them selfs without work residency...or ovrstayed thier work visa to work in the black market
@@harbifm766766 It is well known that the Saudi government and other Gulf states deport their labour force after a few years because they fear that these immigrants will form political groups due to the slave-like working environment. Usually people from Africa and the Indian subcontinent are milked under slave-like conditions for 2-8 years, then there is a huge wave of deportations and new ones are imported, so that social groups that could form political groups break apart.
@@alexbind8347 the problem is no one is actually rationally explaining how, they just basically stomp their feet and insist it’ll happen with no actual logic. Maybe it could happen if intelligent effective people wanted it to, but as of now the people who want it aren’t really capable of anything based on their behavior in this comment section at least.
what do you mean how? people still have food and water, how long will those last? elites make the game and the old elites are old, the only real threat is the left.@@billusher2265
I had been regarding Islamic countries as something like crazy terrorists. I've changed my mind and I can now appreciate their pragmatism, after seeing how these "developed" counties are harming themselves for the sake of nonsenses shilled as "humanitarian".
@@Hunter-Biden-Official surely it will haunt them in the future. Only indoctrinated Western boomers, zionist Jews and fundamentalist evangelicals still take them seriously.
I could not disagree more. The Swiss just secured a referendum guaranteeing that the population will not exceed 10 million by 2050. No one even made a tiny fuss - this would be UNTHINKABLE five years ago. I will not be a doomer
@@alexbind8347 its a very sober analysis of the situation and extremely doomer - 100 spaniards kicked the muslim rulers out of Spain a few hundred years ago. I refuse to be a doomer. I don't even have an issue with small minority populations or internal migration within the EU. I don't care about how many Poles are in Sweden or Irish in the UK. I only care about the non-EU minority populations rising above 8% in EU nations. That is infringing on the rights of Europeans, it is morally wrong and it can be fixed. These videos are excellent, excellent analysis of the situation on the ground
It is not impossible. History shows that it is possible to forcefully move large numbers of people from one place to another, it there is a political will to do so. And we have the logistics to do so.
It's impossible because the majority, moreso the women in the affected countries, do not see it as an issue. The only thing you can do now is look into separatism.
"It's impossible because we let women vote". Reminder that politics is exertion of violence. All that has to change is who is willing to wield violence. Women will not stand in the way of the men of their race deporting racial foreigners if they face risk of physical violence for it.
History also shows that doing this usually results in a high death toll and permanently bad relations between the deporting country and receiving country. Like with Greece and Turkiye. Also, damn, talk about a failed state. If the Germans can't handle a million immigrants, I'd hate to see how they handle the next economic crisis.
More than 5 million Turks were expelled from the Balkans by a population that was barred from military service for half a millennium, by a state with no immigration agency or expulsion program.
It’s different. He tried to explain that in a previous video as well. In that case most of the Turks and this includes a lot of non Turkish muslims were actually willing to go to Turkey and the Turkish government was more than happy to accept them. In this case these people are extremely unwilling to leave and their homelands don’t want them back.
@@irksomecodger9667 What a ridiculous notion. Imagine believing that any civilian willingly picked an upwards of 500 kilometer transcontinental journey in an empire with food shortages after giving up all your land and property. Not to mention the fact that the "Turkish government" literally didn't even exist at that point in time, but was rather an Ottoman bureaucracy straight from the Middle Ages. It seems to me like you assume that the Greek-Turkish population exchange is analogous to the massacres and cleansings of the Balkan Wars, something that just isn't true.
The average peasent who participated in such was desperately poor and exceedingly bigoted along with being generally tough from years of mountain farming something that can't be sad about modern populations 😭
Your numbers are way way far from the truth , most saudi ( men and women ) actually work in the private sector , and i am talking about millions of Saudis. Yes , saudi have many foreigners workers . Most of them wark in the construction and services sectors . For example My wife is a teacher working in a private school for 8 hours a day and her salary is about 1500 us dollars a month . My son is a mechanic engineer working for a private sector company and his warking hours from 9:00 in the morning to 17:00 ( 8 hours) for 2000 us dollars a month . I worked for the government for 40 years as a computer programmer ( i am retired right now) . So 2/3 of my family is working in the private sector and this actually the trend in saudi arabia as the government are encouraging this path .
They mean the real private sector as in doing the difficult jobs not subsidized by the government. Although saudi arabia has started to employ more saudis in the economy.
Yes, and also he is incorrect about Somali people getting departed enmass from Saudi Arabia. Somalis are not allowed to work in the Kafala system because of the Arab league. Many Ethiopians claim Somali to take advantage of this. Also, Saudi pays for flight ticket if Somali person is unable to get back home. Most of this is not true. Ofc, the situation in Europe is dire as you see in the comment section....
It may not be possible in the west at least for now,but in the Balkans things are different. Bulgaria becomes more ethnically Bulgarian every year thanks to gypsies and turks going to Germany or turkey while young Bulgarians who went abroad are returning in droves. Also the birth rate is slowly climbing up. And the young people in my school are not liberals at all. I study in what is considered one of the most liberal schools in the capital and here, we the 18year olds talk about the bs in western Europe and more and more people start talking about the ,,austrian painter" with the teachers and noone will tell you anything. The things we talk about will get you expelled in Germany 😂. Also the younger boys see us as role models and copy us. Also since the pension system is bs a lot of people start investing by having many kids from an early age or at least think about it.
bulgarias population has been on the decline for awhile now last year the population shrank by 0.6% thats alot for a country of 6 million, seems ur engaging in wishful thinking, even russia is now importing millions of african migrants, the west is lost
@@taknoef9195 at least we are ethnically stable. Safe home safe country. The birth rate will naturally rise and we will once again have a natural growth. I just hope that the western Europe takes in immigrants for a long time to come because we still have a liberal, corrupt government. But that will be solved as well since the far right is rising. Stay in Sweden and don't bring your liberal bs here.
Hello! Great work on this video as usual Kaiser! As a Saudi, I think I have a bit of insight into the matter that can help correct some misconceptions. Sorry... this may be long. I know you read the comments often, so I want to do my part in giving you the best I have. So, first point: You mentioned that Saudi is attempting to change its absolute monarchist/theocratic/totalatarian state. This is really far from the truth. Is it trying to get the broader world to accept those things more, and perhaps overlook it if they disagree? Yes. Is it changing it? No. I don't think I need to explain why a monarch wouldn't want to abolish his own monarchy, and the citizens are seruously devout and religious that secularism is out of the question. So theocratic monarchy it remains. Second, you explained how Saudi citizens barely do work (at least in the public sector) and get quite a padded pay. Yes, this was absolutely true. Emphasis on was. Before 2016 this was the reality. No work, a lot of money, no taxes, etc. Im sure youve heard of Vision 2030. While to a foreigner its highlighted by these crazy projects you hear about, internally it has also done a lot of massive changes. Public jobs are now mych harder and more competitive and effective than private jobs. My father for example, who worked on a project in the public sector, would often work 12-16 hours a day. This is very known now, and surprisingly, most of us see it positively. People celebrate that we now seem to be building our own country, and actively working in it. "Saudisation" is everyone's favourite term. Its the limiting of foreigners into specific jobs, and this applies to both public and private, and high-skilled and low-skilled work. While pre-2016, any Saudi was basically guranteed a well paying job, now it is seriously, uncompromisingly competitive. Also, a good proportion of women work, and most who don't have done part time job, and don't work. So in conclusion, goverment jobs have gotten much harder and pay a fair amount less. Economic restructuring isn't just for show. Third point, you mentioned how Saudis are for the measures against illegal immigration. Yes. Most Saudis are also against the massive legal immigration, hence the government's Saudisation (quoteas for saudis in various jobs in the private and punlic sectors) work. Fourth, you pointed out that Saudi operates on a social contract where the state monopolizes power in exchange for welfare, high standards of living, etc, and that it is far too centralised, and dissent is practially impossible. This is a favourite of almost any social or economic analysis of Saudi. Its also very stupid. I dont know what source this originates from but its seriously inaccurate. Very evidently so, given that while Saudi's comforting jobs and high pay for citizens, and the lack of taxes, both no longer exist, support, loyalty and nationalism is at an all time high. According to various stats and polls, Saudis are the most optimistic about the future. So then, whats the basic social framework of Saudi Arabia? Well, unsurprisingly, Islam. Religion is seriously not some aesthetic we put on our flag and national anthem. It is the fundamental brick of our society and culture. As long as Al Sauds, in the eyes of the Saudis, are good Muslims and overall obedient to God and his commands, theyll have the basic support. Think of how the west worships democracy. If a westerner suggested something undemocratic theyll be thrown in a ditch, right after being publicly curicified and fed live mice. Secondly, the government doesnt have the absolute power you often seem to think it does. And it cannot and will not "do things without having to answer to anyone". Anyone who tells you that a ruler can just continuously go against the wishes of his subjects is delusional. We arent in 1300 anymore. Everyone knows the details of what goes on and people DO often oppose decisions. All you need to do is look at the biggest Saudi news account on twitter @SaudiNews50, look at a tweet thats reporting a new rule or decision, you will rarely find a comment section where people are disagreeing or giving their take comfortably. Sometimes nationalists on Twitter try to "cancel" someone for opposing a major decision (as in a celebrity or a major influencer). It becomes a huge trend on twitter, no chance any law enforcement or govermment official doesn't get alerted to it. Nothing happens at all. The goverment on paper and the government in reality are quite different things, where reality is quite more lenient than on paper. Furthermore, you (the west) continue to fail having even a correct basic understanding of our social structure. Besides obviously not knowing the first thing about Islam, you guys seriously underestimate how serious and huge tribes are as a social force. When King Abdulaziz (the guy you lot call "Ibn Saud"), united Saudi often by marrying into medium and large tribes. This means that most princes and princesses's mothers side often are from various tribes. Often you'll find those princes and princesses maintaining stong relationships with their mothers tribe, as a form of diplomacy. This is something I am sure you all are completely oblivious to. Like... and this might seem like a flex, but im hust trying to demonstrate what I mean, I am only about 3 familial connections away from the current king, king Salman. My mom's aunt is married to someone from the Sudairi family, who are the mother's side of King Salman. She is married to the King's uncle. As in, my mothers direct aunt is the wife of the king's direct uncle. No, I'm not rich for those asking (yet :)). While im a bit closer than the average guy, it remains true that you'll find most people have quite a familial connection to someone somewhere within the royal family. Now, why is all this necessary? Well, tribes are serious business. Many tribes can, if they wished, create serious chaos that could shatter the country. My tribe for example (sorry, as an Arab it is obligatory to flex your tribe), and a few other's (including my mothers tribe... again... sorry... my dna...), as well as a few other tribes, like the Dawasir, Zahran, etc. Now, obviously, we dont do any of that, because we like the royal family lol, but im saying, the balance of power isnt as you all think. Also, usually the people in the army tend to be from rural areas, which are much more tribal than urban areas. And... if it was to choose between loyalty to the tribe or the goverment, people rural areas find the decision easy. I think the point is made. So to conclude this point: No, its not becaus the goverment keeps showering us money that ee allow them unchecked power. Its because we continually see examples of them usimg this power in ways we see as positive. As long as that keeps going, we will continue to give them the keys to power. I hope this helps :)
This is an informative comment; I really learned something new here. I had no idea Saudi society worked that way. While I favor liberal democracy, I recognize that: (1) Like all political systems, liberal democracy is flawed and cannot turn men into angels, and (2) it is not the default setting of humanity; we in liberal democracies tend to act as if other systems of governance are weird aberrations from some kind of norm To us, absolute monarchies feel like relics of the past, since Europe got rid of theirs or reformed them into limited monarchies. We only ever see them in fantasy stories, so they feel almost unreal. Seeing a real one like Saudi Arabia makes us wonder how that’s even possible in the modern age - who’d want to live under a KING? While I can’t speak for everyone, that’s the general idea. I’m glad you explained Saudi in a little more depth.
well maybe Saudis are so positive about their future compared to Europeans is because the West is lead by incompetent old males who have no trust from the population and no believable vision for the future while Saudi Arabia has a young, energetic leader who seems to be competent and has the power to act on his ideas. But let's see if it works out in the end.
@@rawlenyanzi6686 You're very much welcome! I often see videos with millions of views spreading some honestly stupid takes about our country and how it works. RealLifeLore is pretty much a textbook example, 50 minutes of "explaining" Sauidi society and history, getting pretty much everything wrong. Perhaps it is a side effect of being the center of the world for the past 600 years that things are either your way or no way, and the world must only be seen and analyzed through the same perspective and dimensions as the west. I do try and correct any mistakes I find. Sometimes I get warm responses of people who are really surpised about what seems like a whole different world opening for them. Others call me a government agent. The latter... is much more common lmfao. Westerners seem to have a tendency to think anyone who isn't patiently waiting for the American Eagle of Super Democracy Freedom ™️ to come in with their Freedom and Libertry ™️ to destroy our evil corrupt systems must only logically be a government agent. 🤷♂️ And as an answer to why someone would want to live under a king. I mean, think of it from our perspective. A hundered years ago, we lived in the harshest place in the world. A barren desert with no resources, constant tribal warfare, and hostile neighbours who completely crush any attempt we make to try and create a central state (Ottomans, Persians, Egypt). Today we are some of the richest people in the world, living some of the most comforting lives in the world, with continuous progress forward in terms of economy and standard of living that has yet to hit it's sealing. Then look at the west from an outside perspective. You guys have Biden, Sunak and Macron. You guys had the world in the palm of your hands and you're losing it. Coincidentally, your decline happened to begin around the same time you abolished a lot of your monarchies. You tried to force democracy on our neighbours and they still haven't recovered from your "freedom" and "democracy". From this perspective, surely you can understand why we prefer monarchy? We went from the raggiest of rags to the richest of riches under one, and you seem to have went from the richest of riches, to squabbling populist beaurocrats who need America to wipe their ass everyday. I am aware this isn't exactly how things are. I am simply explaining a perspective that we have about you. We also don't have the "divine right to rule" bullshit Europe had. Your right to be king is measured on how well you uphold Allah's commandments, and how well you do as a king. And certainly, a king is much more effective than a president. A president has to go through stupid beaurocacy, opposition, populism, etc etc etc. A king simply does. Very simply, we find that the balance of power we strike (through religion and communties), and the natural incentive for a king to be a more long term thinker... probably do his best to have his children inherit a good Kingdom lol, enough security for us to give the King this absolute power (on paper). The King, as everyone else does, knows that religious institutions and tribal communities are no joke. And that he only has as much power as the population gives him. This, to us, is enough "checks and balances", and whatever else we compromise, we are willing to do so in exchange for effective, serious leaders. Tldr: based alpha chad dictator who does what he wants > beta virgin president who has to constantly ask for permission from unelected beurocrats and big corporations.
@@Nawaf-qk9mu I will say that liberal democracy requires a moral center that can only be provided by religion (in the West’s case, Christianity.) With the sidelining of Christianity in the western democracies after World War I, there is a lot more dysfunction and hypocrisy since the governments no longer have a limiting principle to keep their worst impulses in check. I feel like a lot of freedoms we Westerners take for granted are slipping away, and secularism did nothing to protect these freedoms.
@@rawlenyanzi6686 Certainly so... While I undoubtedly prefer a monarchy, I don't see the issue (yet) with a sharia-compliant republic, where the constitution clearly upholds that Islam is the ultimate judge. I will not say democracy though, I reserve my concession to an Islamic republic.
It's always important to look broadly, and attempt to learn from many sources, even the policies of other countries, but the more starkly different a country is from your own, the less likely its policies are to be fully compatible with yours. That's not to say they can't be implemented, only that enacting them would come at significant difficultly, and even then, whether it will provide lasting success (or more so in this case, be a sustainably popular policy) is up in the air.
Yet is still must be done. Hard choices must be made, the hard road is here, we must be willing to fight it, an uphill battle yet we have been here many times before, we must unify this time again, to bring ourselves to a single block that can handle anything that the world will thorw our way. Or if we dont they will kill us off. The petty issues must die now for our suvival as a raicla group, as of now ethnicities are irrelevent in regards to our current situation. We must unite or were fucked.
During the 80s, 150.000 unemployed Turks remigrated from Germany back to Turkey. They were offered around 10.000 DM to leave the country. It is possible.
In your videos you concentrate on developed or almost developed countries. What intrigues me is the fate of countries which are still relatively poor and are aging rapidly like Brazil, Iran or Thailand. What will happen to them in your opinion?
They will fracture and implode, or With Leaders with good temperament and intelligence will separate into more than one small region, ceasing to exist in their current form. The transition will be brutal. This is predicted for all countries in Europe, except UK, France , Scandinavia and "possibly" Spain
Stagnation/instability for probably centuries. Economies of scale and general technological and intellectual inertia that US and China have in the context of global economy is impossible to overstate. Rich countries will ALWAYS be able to cause brain drain in every less developed part of the world. In the era of seamless global communications and transport you simply have no way to keep valuable people/companies/resources in "our hands". Until something catastrophic happens to them, the rest of us simply have no room for growth.
When people say things can't stay the same they mean that we cannot continue with the current government and very often system of government. They are fully aware that the current political parties won't admit their mistakes let alone rectify it, and indeed that from the elite perspective what is happening isn't a mistake at all. What they are saying is that they will restructure the political framework as necessary, I think you misunderstand the contemporary climate, we are in a sense politically at some point before 1920, the only thing stopping kinetic action from the (largely disenfranchised) opposition is means and opportunity. If their is a world war then expect for us to reach the post-war period very soon, the demoralisation is already near the Russian provisional government level. Indeed one of the notable things in the current climate is how much the motivation precedes the means.
then we must get the word out to make it clear that the brothere war must not come, we must see past our petty issues and get the people to see us as one group so we can organize and get everything under our control before everyone else organizes ahead of us.
Cutting welfare as well as other benefits we generously hand out will send MANY of these people back. Making life harder for them and then offering a financial incentive to leave to their home country will be tempting. You can also clamp down hard on their cultural practices and make them 'integrate'. Any criminals will be sent back etc. There are definitely ways to make this happen. Also saction weaker countries for not accepting them back. And since its this, or losing the continent forever, i think we shouldnt easily count ourselves out. Its insulting to our ancestors who sacrificed so much to make such a once wonderful place.
The only way this will work is if European governments consciously lower the living standards of their own countries to below that of the migrant source country. How badly do you want to get rid of refugees? Are you prepared to live on one dollar a day?
@@userre85 I'm not sure how that would develop. The Aryans invaded, conquered and established a caste system in their favour. In Europe, the Aryans are the ones under invasion and conquest.
@@chico9805 Irrelevant detail. Indo-aryans could not go back to the Eurasian urals. Non-European migrants cannot/will not go back to their origin countries.
We also need to talk about the EU. As long as the EU exists it will be impossible to any government to proceed to any reemigration process, or even any real attempt to stop migration.
The post-Brexit UK is the best example that the EU (though not helpful or useful in any capacity) is not the root of these problems. Non-white migration skyrocketed after Brexit (i guess british conservatives prefer endless third-world parasites rather than some eastern european workers lol). Plus they already have non-whites leading both the UK as a whole and Scotlistan in particular.
@@mauroalexisfernandez2357 kind of funny the most vocal anti immiragrant politicians in uk goverment are from immigrant parents themselves, Rishi, Suella, Kemi
@@johnybecool2810 lol most immigrants dont even want to live in hungary salaries are too low, even young hungarians have left they have filled up berlin
ΚaiserBauch: Saudi Arabia can successfully stop immigration. Also KaiserBauch: european countries, the US, Canada, Australia, NZ cannot, because....Africa and Asia have big populations (but this does not apply in the case of Saudi Arabia). Me: that is a bit 🤡.
I talk about Europe in this video. I have not said a word about US, NZ, Canada or Australia. I also did not say further immigration could not be stoped, I am talking about large scale remigration. And I never said the reason is large population of Asia and Africa :D
@@kaiserbauch9092 I misunderstood then. Did you happen to just flag any of my comments by the way? Because I just received the well known message by RUclips, that I violated "community guidelines" concerning "h@te speech".
@@JamzYamz7 it's strange how biracial kids have such a high level of infertility 🫢 Obama adopted his daughters, Drake isn't the father and Andrew Tate can't have children
@@JamzYamz7Why are biracial kids infertile when the father is black? Why did Obama adopt his daughters. The tiger and lion can have a baby but they are always infertile.
I think you're being too critical. Times are changing and I think if anything, re-immigration is becoming more and more acceptable in the minds of the public. The real problem is fertility rates
They only pseudo-ban most comments. If you sort them by newest, rather than the default option, you will see the comments. This is very obvious and easy to see under videos with only few comments
The comments are deleted and this is why you can't tell! Do not think that your comment section represents anything meaningful! Please do not forget this!
The comments are not deleted, unless RUclips gives you a pop up saying it was deleted. You need to sort the comments by "newest", to see them all. They are effectively shadow-banned like this
21:40 the thing is about the Pakistani and Iranian immigrants is that they propose a risk to these countries as they would run the risk of returning with anti regime policies
Author of this video with his super objective approach is actually rather naive and doesn't understand how politics works. Even if you understand that remigration is impossible it still makes sense to support narratives about remigration because if there are non-marginal people in society who talk about remigration then conversations about the necessity to almost completely limit immigration (without remigration) will not look radical and far-right. Most political movements becomes successful not when they chooses the single most rational or most radical strategy but when there are different strategies each of which has a certain benefit. Radicals and utopians may not come to power but their presence contributes to changing the political environment and less radical people are seen as reasonable moderates.
This is probably the first channel i’ve seen discuss and look at this in such a objective and debate type way without any uneeded xenophobia. It feels like a genuine covereage rather then political pandering to whatever side, very well done man! I’m subbed It’s funny you mentioned your viewers are far right or very anti immigration, i am neither of those. I think we are entering a time where even the left people who are in the middle are concerned about this.
you can still see the delusion in the comment section here when people parrot the exact same pointless positions that Kaiser already talked about here or in his previous video, without any genuine justification or reasoning as to why their positions have any weight. if this kind of absolute brainrot didn't infect so many in the anti-immigration political sphere, we wouldn't have lost so much.
Agreed what you said about leftists being concerned. I think we’re also beginning to enter a time where this whole Islam/immigration issue won’t be a left or right issue, but more simply just common sense. I hope this will be the mindset everyone takes
@@kv4648 my comment was deleted, so ill just post a more kid-friendly version: never underestimate the copium and absolute lack of foresight in the the far right. I've tried (for years) to explain these same issues and past mistakes to others all over, and they just say the same thing over and over again. What changes in the real world? Nothing as usual lol
Denmark is onto something! Germany, France, UK, etc. should take note and adjust their policies accordingly. Family unification should NEVER be a priority. Most of the migrants are young men -- Let them marry a first generation citizen from their own ethnic group rather than bringing over a (usually a child) bride. (Most European women do not want them)
I am an American and just from anecdotal experience I must say EU migrants are far more damaging than US migrants. Of course I am not looking forward to the demographic decline of white America and I have my own gripes with our immigration policy in the US, but at least Latin American migrants have some European cultural DNA (Speak European Languages, are largely Catholic, Offshoot of western values). Being that Europe is so close to the middle east and Africa It truly saddens me to think you are forced to take on people who are often so openly hostile to the west and unwilling to assimilate into European culture. Additionally, the Mormons and Amish of the US have very good birth rates and have predominantly white European ancestry, say what you will about their beliefs but these small bastions of growth are something to celebrate if we are to preserve western culture and values. However, and correct me if im wrong, Europe dosent even seem to have these holdouts. I wish all of my European friends out there the best for what is to come in your future, I ask that you really do fight to maintain your homeland. As an American I can say the world would be a far worse place without Europe and its contributions, and i hope to never see the day that becomes a reality.
I am 75, and live in Nebraska, USA. When young, most of the kids inmy school had ancestors who arrived in America before our Revolution. Now I live in Omaha and the Omaha Public Schools are heavily Hispanic, with some schools where Hispanics, Blacks and Asians are all more common than the white kids who were almost universal when I was young.
I spent the first 20 years of my life in Colorado before leaving in 2020, and it was the exact same. At least half of all students in all the schools (regardless of public or private) were hispanic. I moved to Idaho in 2020 and things are the way they should be, the way things USED to be.
You guys need to relax. Hispanics in the US become Americanized within 1-2 generations like clockwork. Source? My grandmother came over the rio grande with no documents, and now I don't even speak spanish and am bassically fully American. I honestly don't get the hype from either side. I am just being my individual self
I like how your analysis are always with a realistic outlook and free from personal bias. People are often full of delusional wishful thinking when it comes to certain topics. As far as I understand, the original concept of remigration is more of a set of policies setting economic and social incentives rather than forceful mass deportations.
Yep. Sadly, there are too many people spouting their fantasies as some inevitability. For the foreseeable future, so long as the bulk of Europe remains strongly liberal democratic, they will *always* be friendly towards immigration, "human rights", and universal adult suffrage. These policies do benefit the national economy compared to autocracies that jumble the laws that makes it difficult for business to thrive -- but it comes at a cost of culture.
@@kafon6368 Idk, I'm not a fan of the culture of such autocracies either. The extreme repression of women's rights in the gulf states, or paranoid homophobia in Russia, may be culturally stable, but that doesn't mean they are good!
@@alexpotts6520 Yeah, life is give-and-take. You give up a benefit in order to take another benefit. A shame the West's material fortune comes at a cost of its cultural cohesion.
The problem is over-population in countries outside Europe in the global south. It's apparent these countries are incapable of meaningful economic and social development, the examples of South Africa and Zimbabwe are highly instructive. So as long as there is food available from countries that produce surpluses to fuel the population expansion and the surplus population can be exported the problem will only ever get worse. At some point the target countries economies will seriously decline due to over-population. The big issue will be water availability. I anticipate that at some point there will be catastrophic famines affecting multiple countries, it's not going to pretty. Famines and population crashes will serve to exacerbate the issues because fertility rebounds strongly after a famine, as shown by the examples of African countries affected by major famines as well as Inda.
If there is ever a will, it can be done. But the question is ‘should it be done’ considering the consequences and fanaticism required to carry it out. I’m an immigrant from the Balkans myself and I love the U.K. where I live and am a citizen. I’m a skilled professional, if I had to be removed by force I’d probably fight to stay… all my property, investments, network, contacts etc are here so I’d be destroyed if I got deported. I think we have to halt new illegal immigration now
I love how Greenland is so big and Denmark is so small that when he said that he was going to do a case study on 2 countries I thought the second one was Greenaldn
The only reason I am even interested in this is because OTHER people see it as an existential threat. So I do not have the luxury of ignoring them. But they, in return, could not care less about what I consider existential threats : the emancipation of fools and tied to that the fact that higher educated people get fewer children. And climate change. That what I worry about far more. So I struggle to give them what they want because they will NEVER return the favour, they don't want me to have it.
climate change is a non-issue, a scam more then anything else, it will be forgotten as an issue when this existential crisis becomes full circle. bigger problems are things like the UN, the USA, Israel, Russia, Saudi-Arabia, NGO’s, lobby groups, online censorship, big tech domination of global markets, risk of ww3 due to competition with China and Russia. if you want high IQ people, then some kind of rightwing progressive movement would be nessisary but we are a long way from that.
You assume to much. People Like US are desillusioned w the world. We See that the Establishment hates us and actively works towards Our total ethnical and cultural annilihation and "climate Change" IS obviously Part of this Plot. ITS Not that WE dont Take your wellbeing seriously ITS Just the fact youre worried about Something that will affect you NOT AT ALL while Not giving the slightest Shit that Out cities are running to rubble and chaos
Love that I found your channel. Your knowledge of this subject is evident, and your realism is undeniable. I have always thought remigration to be unrealistic, and aiming for it to be politically counterproductive. The best outcome that is politically attainable is the stopping of new immigration, and even that is going to be a giant uphill battle. Western populations simply will not stomach the harshness which would be involved in a serious remigration effort, pushing for it will alieanate moderates. A future where Western Europe ends up with a population that is still 70% european is a liveable future. Birthrates of immigrant populations are dropping fast, a bright spot which more people should acknowledge.
I think countries like France with their vast empty farm lands should pay religious family to have a farming community based on Catholicism and high birth rates
Oh wow, i commented a while back asking you to look at the demography of saudi Arabia... Ill watch it on my way to work... as a saudi i think i may have unique insight into some things, so allow me to make comments and possible corrections or context once i do watch it! Thanks once again! Youre a legend! Ill make it a seperate comment, i wanna reserve this as thanks!
I love your videos, I appreciate the thought, research, and hard work that goes into them. Watching them has taught me a great deal about the world, I am thankful that you share this information with us 😊
In the end, it's all about the reason why people are going far right in Europe. Simply being anti immigration is not enough anymore if your ideal Europe is the one from the past. Let's wait and see what happens
Man I watched video of 15 years old who is married when he is 14 years old and he is now a father and he speaks as if he is very mature 30 years old man.. they get married in young age and they get ALOT of children and they still can provide them very very well
You also need to understand that europe doesnt have many natural resources and so european companies get them from poor african countries by hook or by crook so if europe decides to strong arm those poor nations they might just start takinga actions against European companies. Saudi arabia on the other hand has oil the most important resource and can basically import the rest
Demographic change might be permanent, but we can still save the secular culture if we start to fight for it. We can still decide if we become like Iran/Saudi or like Spain/Malta. Spain and Malta both has some arabic influences, but both stand firmly in the Christian tradition. Democracy might be over though, we probably cannot save the future if we put our faith in inept women, socialists and the enemy who is already inside our borders and vote together with us in our elections. What Europe needs is a right wing military takeover and an iron fist rule that puts an end to feminism, wokeism and islamism, and promotes values such as secularism, freedom and the idea of a republic.
Many of these ideas seem mutually contradictory, non-democratic republicianism, etc. I don't want a secular society I want Christian monarchy, local autonomy and a crusade.
Many thanks for your perspective. Hope my message finds you. Ever since I watched "Europa The Last Battle," I have this strong feeling that Europe will be islamised by design. Can you make a video on "Islamisation of Europe?" We need to be prepared if that is the case.
Islamification wont happen. It failed to take root in india despite hundreds of years of muslim rule. Many muslims are also not actually muslims. Reforming islam is the way to go.
@@danielpaduret5491 for example, if you look at arab spring, syria refugee crisis, ukraine war (energy price increase in europe), red sea crisis (trade goods from china price increase), gaza cricis (refugees to be setteled in europe), the war is on Europe, not Russia
@@murkhuddindalal The war isn't in Europe, Europe is just getting the effects of the wars in other continents. Every country around the world loose to these conflicts except the USA as always.
Could you do a video about the demographics of the UK? There seems to be a lot of variables unique to their situation on the topic of migration and demographics in general, for example the consequences of being the birthplace of the Industrial Revolution and the waves of migrants that left the isles overtime.
Bro you have the mindset that there aren’t bold people out there with balls that can get into power and do some stuff. You think “oh well the numbers say this and you can’t fight back” nah bro that’s not how the real world works
Europe's politics will be very different in 20 years than it is today. This channel's owner has difficulty believing that. Countries don't need agreements. Immigrants just have to choose to self deport.
The EU attacked Poland for years because of our policy. Turns out, we were right.
What policy specifically?
@@j.langer5949not allowing Muslim migrants I assume?
@@j.langer5949 Not accepting immigrants
As a Western European, I perfectly agree with Poles. But don't mistake the EU for the people of Western Europe, which are also increasingly fed up with the ideology in Brussels. Hopefully we can reverse this universalist/liberal ideology without destroying the political union altogether...
Poland accepts many non-European migrants, but legally.
I'm Danish.
If, as you say, Denmark have the strictest immigration policies in the western world, things look extremely bad for the west. Because situation with immigration in Denmark is very far from rosy !
Western europe have been subverted as Yuri Bezmenov predicted 40 years ago.
Vaccination forced on immigrants, do not ask questions;)
@@OrthoMan_100Denmark looks like heaven compared to others
I now live in Copenhagen, but travel from time to time through Berlin. It is a stark contrast in favor of Danes. And keep in mind that Capitols are always the worst cases.
There are things that locals could complain about, but I do not hear nor experience anything dramatic. Like in Sweden.
Some of you seem to miss my point.
Some of you kinda say it yourself, between the lines; Denmark have some problems, but other countries have greater problems ... As if that would negate the Danish problems.
Anyway, my actual point is: West is sold, if Denmark is top of the pack.
I think another factor that contributes to Denmark’s harsh immigration policy is because Copenhagen is basically right next to Malmö Sweden. Danes get the front row seats to witness the shit show on the other side every time LMAO
Poor Swedes having to seek refugee in København 😂 Malmö is the epitome of white flight, less than 45% are natives Swedes there and their imported engineers, doctors make up of the cities 20-25% unemployment rate combined with an awful economy.
I'm Australian who is moving to odense next week (also grandparents are norwagian) I remembered going to malmo for the first time from Copenhagen, couldn't be happier to be back in Denmark. Also worked in Northern Sweden, they said scandia can go back to Denmark 😂
There’s an Arab saying that goes like this
One people’s misfortunes grants another people fortunes
@@EM-tx3ly - And they should know!
Damn. I wish i was Arab now
Official: "You're being deported. If you don't tell us where are you really from, you'll be deported to Denmark."
Migrant: "Well, OK.. I don't care."
Official: "To Denmark - Greenland specifically. In the middle of it."
Migrant: *shocked* "Erm, I'm from Nigeria."
That’s a human rights violation. Literally a death sentence.
@@bornstar481 Calm down, it's a hypothetical deportation inside a hypothetical scenario.
@@bornstar481 The concept of human rights is a Liberal concoction, with no basis in reality. The only rights we have are those God-given, and each comes with responsibilities.
@@chico9805That sounds like the perfect justification for committing atrocious acts against other humans. History would prove me right.
@@elianes5505Yes, if you completely ignore that I stated the importance of God-given rights.
Also, I'm not sure history is your friend here, considering the post-enlightenment humanist paradigm has led to some of the worst atrocities in history, including the French Revolution, Russian Revolution and Mao's "Great Leap Forward".
You didn't mention that it's nearly impossible to obtain citizenship in Gulf states, whereas in most European countries, you may naturalize within merely few years. Having in mind migration crisis is a decade old problem, most of these refugees have already became citizens. How does a country deport its own citizens? This is completely different in Gulf states where your residency may always get cancelled for whatsoever reasons...
He mention it in the previous video.
@@xSkyWeix Thank you, I managed to miss it somehow.
@@Hemoforrage Your welcome :)
You seize power and change the rules.
But so called "mainstream media" never mentioned this for 30 years, did they.
The only way for Europeans to survive as ethnicities is to develop a strong ethnic consciousness: gather into communities, reclaim our traditions, build healthy and large families etc. It will increasingly happen as we turn a minority in our own lands, but our survival as peoples hinges on how strongly and quickly we gain this sense of community.
It is already happening. Also search up r/K selection strategy, it'll blow your mind
In russia there is a fck around and find out when it comes to crossing illegally
European isnt an ethnicity. Danish, german, english, flemish, walloons, french is an ethnicity. These ethnicities may have a shared european identity but that doesnt make european an ethnicity
I think he also meant it that way was just worded unclearly @@letsgetsometruth4516
Europeans do have strong ethnic consciousness. The problems is their dysfunctional and counterproductive traditions. The tradition of excessive materialism and individuality, obsession with hedonism and anti-social/anti-family culture. Why not changing the culture rather than clinging to a failed/dysfunctional one?!
In Denmark nationalist gained power in 2001 and successfully moved the Overton window to the point where even left wing mainstream parties now have to give at least platitudes towards nationalism. Nobody in Denmark talks of diversity as a strength, yet things are far from ideal. We need much more action to solve the problems caused by unhinged migration, but at least we can talk openly about it being a problem here.
That is going to change, though. Young people are very left-leaning.
@@wezzuh2482 that's the refreshing thing, that is the youth of our generation, but Alex Vanopslagh, the new chairman of the Danish libertarian party is very popular, especially on ticktock. He have inspired untold thousands to the cause, they gained 9% in the last election and shows no sign of stopping
@@wezzuh2482 also, remember, you cannot stop an idea whose time have come. Nationalism just moved Denmark first because Denmark have usually always been on the forefront, other nations who struggle more against it are going to have a rougher time adopting to the new times
@RedOne-ib1me what?, thou think it is a bad thing to be able to talk openly about the problems of society?
@RedOne-ib1me It is certainly true that no country stays great forever. the history of Denmark is mostly about a country that stayed graceful in defeat. A thousand years ago we were one of the primer powers of the world, conqueror of England, founder of Russia, discoverer of America, but one thing that stays constant and if universally true, is that every country is a reflection of its people.
The Danes are the indigenous people of Denmark, what is immoral is surrendering our ancestral homeland due to a warped political view of self righteous moral superiority. An ideology that exist only in the west, as no one else is dumb enough to surrender the most precious and holy in order to "look good" in front of people that they don't even like. Look at Japan.
When I said that Denmark are mainstreaming nationalism, I meant it as a sign of pride. We are better then Sweden, because they have only recently started to see the problem and take action against it, who are again better the Germany, whose nationalist party the AfD is still looked at with scorn rather then admired, who are again better then Ireland who don't even have a nationalist party.
But nationalism is an idea whose time have come. Every country will embrace it, every country will in time take the corrective actions necessary to purge the poison of globalism and multiculturalism that have infected them, the question is how serious these actions have to be, and that depends on how early they started to take corrective action.
Compare it to a car racing towards a brick wall. If we step on the breaks early, we might entirely avoid the wall or at least just gently bump into it. But if we keep pressing the accelerator even with airbags we might not make it when we crash
idk it seriously isn't so hard to stop the over 1000 euro benefits per month...
Because ppl who support that policy, are mostly liberal elites living inside gated communities.
Forreal. If they left their home country, they can leave the country they left to.
They would still come. Better climate for example.
@@tomorrowneverdies567in Sweden, Norway,...?😂
Like KaiserBauch, migrants from Africa would even accept slave-like conditions in Saudi Arabia than to remain in their countries. Even without those 1000 euros per month they wouldn't go away
European countries won´t have to restort to forceful remigration. Once enough of the native population becomes hostile and all social benefits are cut in that country, many to most of migrants will move to a different european country. That way, there will be one or two "sacrificial lamb" countries, most probably Britain or Sweden which would get overrun by non-Europeans, and other European nations will empty their migrants there.
yeah, everybody fears the mob of the old 😂
Also remember that the most hardcore supporters of "morality" are older people having grown up in the hippie era. They will soon retire and then...
Not going to work when the foreigners are the state and it’s enforcers
@@whitecisgender4911 while the younger generation would have migrated out of the country
@@taknoef9195 The turks have mostly been repatriated back to turkey from the balkans with the exception of istanbul.
All boils down to one thing :
Low birth rate.
bingo. all the far right people ive met are more obssesed about immigrants but most dont have any kids of their own they are part of the problem, even the far right parties in my country almost all the people in leadership positions dont have any kids
Jews you mean
@IceSpiceNationalist wrong its by the 3rd generation that birth rates are similar to native population not 2nd, immigrant women in sweeden birth rate is almost at 2 but native sweedish is at 1.6
That’s a global problem but unlimited immigration is worsening it in the west. We’d have sustainable family policies by now if companies were left to suffer the lack of a workforce. Suddenly single people would earn less than married couples and married couples without children would make less than married couples with kids etc. companies would pay people more per child to increase fertility until the birth rate is sustainable again. The average European is 50 the companies would have to do this to fix their worker shortage or else they’d perish or move to the US. Japanese companies moved to the US but even American birth rates are in decline. The U.S. can’t save European and Japanese companies from a worker shortage. We’d only delay the inevitable (a wage increase for labor). If we got rid of the unlimited immigration and put on tariffs then wages could increase and so would the birthrate
The problem is, if you left the companies to fix it by not importing workers, the companies won't pay natives more, they'd simply move to wherever their companies to wherever it's more profitable. That'd be even worse.
Immigrants(not refugees) are a net positive in all but 3 european countries. It's understandable why migration rates are so high though there's a need to slow it down to sure societal stability
Nah, we just going back to medieval times. We even have techno-feudalism already developing some fruits 🥰
Stop watching Yanis. Socialists are bad for ya, since they talk about the world that has never existed and can’t exist.
"techno-feudalism"
You mean like those tech companies who provide housing, amenities, food, entertainment, transportation, and security as part of their compensation, like a lord or a king would provide for his skilled workers?
explain what you mean by this?
@@N0rmieDT lol grow up
Varoufakis huh
I have a couple objections:
1. I don't think that most people talking about "remigration" even consider doing this through liberal institutions or, frankly, any form of government that is not an authoritarian fashist ic state.
2. People get rarely what they vote vor: the German SPD voter never really chose mass Emigration, Germans in 1933 did not think that Hitler would actually start killing all the jews, most protestors in 1979 Iran did not think that they are electing a totalitarian theocracy... Once people come to power, especially if through authoritarian means, they assume a life on their own.
You are right about people rarely getting what they vote for, but you also have to consider who would benefit from a mass deportation event. It certainly wouldn't be the people who own the economy, and I don't foresee anti-immigration people gathering the resources needed to replace the local elites before getting crushed.
that's all politics or people in general, the alternative is worse
The nsdap is a special case coming into power during great flux, chaos and societal issues. Furthermore, Hitler was driven massively by ideology, most of it being made public in his hundreds of speeches and in Mein Kampf, which does detail the plans for elimination of Jews and conquest of the east. We are very far from any of that in modern times, thankfully.
But the austrian painter never did that
@@literatureconnoisseur yeah just a jewish ploy
Remigration will happen in the case that there is a government willing to pursue that policy. The problem is that there doesn't seem to be any as of yet or any time soon. But it's completely possible. Just like millions of Europeans descendants living in North Africa until the 1950s and 1960s that were expelled or returned home, we can make them go home as well, even if they've been here for generations.
Sure they'll be an international backlash. But sometimes the benefits are worth the costs
@@asirnewazkhan4172all the world will do is have the UN write an angry worded letter.
And Idi Amin & Robert Mugabe did it as well.
@@Liam-iv7wku depend on resources from international community. What do u think Erdogan will do if u want to expell turks? Lol keep coping😂
Oh yes, very possible. It's not like these countries were military dictatorships at the time and their governments and populations hated the colonizers. Very possible to copy this same system in Europe, trust me bro.
The fundamental mistake in these is thinking that anyone has the intention of solving these problems through the institutions who made them.
This is like responding to the prospect of socialism in 1890's Russia by saying 'I'm not sure the emperor would do that, and he has support from state institutions, the orthodox church and peasants, like 80% of the population of Russia are peasants, nothing will happen, this is all because people are overly within their revolutionary movements'.
Under the scenario that you're implying, millions would die from the chaos in Europe and whatever third-world country they'd be deported into. As far fetched as this seems, the rise of AI is making labor borderline worthless, so there's a real chance that in the mass layoffs which are to occur, the host European populations will turn against the foreigners as everyone tries to get jobs and resources in a post-labor economic system. Let's hope all of this is resolved peacefully.
I am only implying because of this platform, significant disturbances are already taking place, it will be a long process but it will in no respect be peaceful. But some peace 's are unendurable, the one in South Africa for example.
@@Geen-jv6ck How will AI make labour worthless? Only essentially useless desk jobs are under threat, which albeit a large proportion of jobs today, are not everything.
@@chico9805accountants are not a “useless desk job”, lawyers are not a “useless desk job”, computer programmers are not a “useless desk job”. Many of our most important industries are under attack by AI. HR girlies are a useless desk job but they’ll be spared layoffs due to legal requirements. Programmers and engineers aren’t useless. Those are tough degrees to study and they’re facing massive job losses right now
@@chico9805The thing is the majority of people would be jobless as most white collar jobs are done away with and there would be far fewer jobs available than people unemployed. Obviously blue collar jobs exist but, again, there would be more ppl who need jobs than jobs available.
All of this remind me about fall of Roman empire.
Foreigners in the army.
Foreigners in majority of the cities.
Foreigners alternating culture.
you know these foreignes are the ancestors of modern western europeans
And an elite that doesn't give a shit about their motherland.
@@aurelianxcbd7799 Is a metaphor too hard for you to understand?
@@aurelianxcbd7799but now the foreigners are musl8m. 😂
Foreigners had been in the Roman army since it's founding.Even Italians were seen as non romans in the early reoublic and they fought a war for attaining citizenship.
Rome fell when the Barbarians didn't want Rome's culture but only it's gold. And that's what is happening to Europe today. The inmigrants dont CARE about european culture. They're just there to reap the most benefits they can.
Demographic change is not permanent. If you make life very very uncomfortable for the invaders they will leave. They will leave.
If you apply affirmative action against them, because it is being done in other lands.
It is a matter of will.
If you make life uncomfortable they will turn to crime. People aren't just going to leave after they've been admitted to your country.
They already do crime
@@bumblingbureaucrat6110 They'll do even more.
@@chico9805 who cares the survival of our race is more important
@@gmodrules123456789 if you take hard measures against those who turn to crime then it might encourage others to leave.
It’s all a matter of what specific decisions are made
We need to repopulate our nations with ourselves. Ultimately birthrate is more important than where people are. As long as we have resources and own land, we have everything we need to raise our fertility.
This guy gets it
Become Amish
women dont want to raise children
Agreed. And does it matter which eithnity anymore. As we can sort that shit out peacefully later on after we reclaim what is rightfully ours.
Dont forget the women. They dont like reproduction any more since the „revolutionary“ 1960/70s. There is no propaganda for children, the subsidies are too low and no religious or whatever mental control. The suicidal „liberal“ system of the West praises absurd heights of individualism, anarchy, no respect for anything but laughable and dumb vulgar „self expression“. „Be different, whatever it takes“. Its insanity and means very quick collective DEATH.
There are two issues which you did not take into consideration.
1) A single european state may become radical enough to do a expulsion of foreign elements. Considering that its neighbours would be modern liberal states, they would be unwilling to use military force (and even if willing the nationalist nations could use its position to aid the illiberal world). Such a state could remove it forcing population into the neighboring states with force. It would also be extremely unattractive for people to stay in due to their non-citzen status and hostile attitude against them
2) the Russian people of the early 1900s did not want Bolshevism, yes they may have wanted socialism in some kind but not the atheist anti-peasant bolsheviks. Yet that is what they got. The people may not want a total restoration of native demographic dominance, but they may get it anyways. All that is needed is one state to follow the correct ideals, and eventually this state could liberate the rest of Europe from replacement and mongrelisation.
I support migrant-free Russia,
@@Hunter-Biden-Official I support a Russia free Russia, but that's neither here nor there.
This is rather wishful thinking than solid arguments. The second is still somewhat better, but even if some contemporary european state would have such extremists subset and big enough to take control. It would more likely lead to straight up ethnic cleansing instead of force re-emigration. But even we assume they will try all the logistic issues raised in the video are still in play and suggest failure and possibly risk of resurgence.
@@Hunter-Biden-Official Russia isn't migrant-free, however, all of the migrants they do let in are from post-USSR/Tsarist Russia states and hence, loyal citizens.
I hope
Most migrants from the Gulf States have not entered these countries illegally, so their country of origin is clear as their passports are confiscated upon entry from their place of work. So there wasnt a way for Yemen, Ethopia etc. to deny that this are their citzens. Moreover, there are still a large number of migrants in the Gulf states, the deportations were more of a "refresher", replacing old migrants with new ones so that they cannot organise politically. The economy of the Gulf States is almost 100% dependent on these migrants, and an actual mass deportation without new arrivals would lead to the implosion of the economy. You have allready seen what happened after brexit in UK without even any mass deportations but just a stop of new ones from EU countries.
very true
Do you mean the economy of European states is dependent on it?
@@kv4648 yes they are. albanians and romanians left greece after covid and there was such a labour shortage the right wing goverment had to legalize illegal immigrants living in the country in order for them to work in farms since so much of the harvest was about to go to waste, so many young greeks have left the country. the goverment is depending on immigrants for a big chunk of the labour force
Not true...first only in saudi illegels passed through Yamen, some of them ethiopian who work illlegely and were deported...other deportee are workers who work for them selfs without work residency...or ovrstayed thier work visa to work in the black market
@@harbifm766766 It is well known that the Saudi government and other Gulf states deport their labour force after a few years because they fear that these immigrants will form political groups due to the slave-like working environment. Usually people from Africa and the Indian subcontinent are milked under slave-like conditions for 2-8 years, then there is a huge wave of deportations and new ones are imported, so that social groups that could form political groups break apart.
remigration will happen by force or by worse.
Nope. Keep coping.
@@billusher2265never say never .
@@alexbind8347 the problem is no one is actually rationally explaining how, they just basically stomp their feet and insist it’ll happen with no actual logic. Maybe it could happen if intelligent effective people wanted it to, but as of now the people who want it aren’t really capable of anything based on their behavior in this comment section at least.
what do you mean how? people still have food and water, how long will those last? elites make the game and the old elites are old, the only real threat is the left.@@billusher2265
if you think this is bad, the leftwing has way too many nutcases to count@@billusher2265
theres actually a very simple solution to this problem. but you need someone with the political will to do it.
I had been regarding Islamic countries as something like crazy terrorists.
I've changed my mind and I can now appreciate their pragmatism, after seeing how these "developed" counties are harming themselves for the sake of nonsenses shilled as "humanitarian".
Indeed, there is no need to feel hate or develop a superiority complex towards other cultures. Just some cultural self-worth is all we need.
Look up r/K selection, this explains what is happening
@@lazarus3956I don't know, Israel is surviving pretty well
@@Hunter-Biden-Official surely it will haunt them in the future. Only indoctrinated Western boomers, zionist Jews and fundamentalist evangelicals still take them seriously.
You deserve what you tolerate.
Look into what Pakistan did with Afghan migrants
Europe is living in a fantasy world 😅
Always was.
Nah, we live in reality were Europe Will live on ☺️✌️
I could not disagree more. The Swiss just secured a referendum guaranteeing that the population will not exceed 10 million by 2050. No one even made a tiny fuss - this would be UNTHINKABLE five years ago.
I will not be a doomer
What you thinking about the video?
What are you thinking about the video ? ??
@@alexbind8347 its a very sober analysis of the situation and extremely doomer - 100 spaniards kicked the muslim rulers out of Spain a few hundred years ago. I refuse to be a doomer.
I don't even have an issue with small minority populations or internal migration within the EU. I don't care about how many Poles are in Sweden or Irish in the UK. I only care about the non-EU minority populations rising above 8% in EU nations. That is infringing on the rights of Europeans, it is morally wrong and it can be fixed. These videos are excellent, excellent analysis of the situation on the ground
In Yugoslavia every immigrant who could leave during the war, did leave Yugoslavia during the war.
when the troubles come, it will be remigrate or [redacted]
No amount of Mar×ism can undo hardwiring.
[redacted] [redacted] or [redacted]
Hardwiring. Muscle memory will kick in.
I support [redacted]
Sadly this the case.
It is not impossible. History shows that it is possible to forcefully move large numbers of people from one place to another, it there is a political will to do so. And we have the logistics to do so.
It's impossible because the majority, moreso the women in the affected countries, do not see it as an issue. The only thing you can do now is look into separatism.
"It's impossible because we let women vote".
Reminder that politics is exertion of violence. All that has to change is who is willing to wield violence. Women will not stand in the way of the men of their race deporting racial foreigners if they face risk of physical violence for it.
History also shows that doing this usually results in a high death toll and permanently bad relations between the deporting country and receiving country.
Like with Greece and Turkiye.
Also, damn, talk about a failed state. If the Germans can't handle a million immigrants, I'd hate to see how they handle the next economic crisis.
women are submissive by nature and if there's enough pressure from society they will flip. @@upstar21t
And two or three generations later, people look back on these examples and apply such terms as 'the Trail of Tears" and "ethnic cleansing."
More than 5 million Turks were expelled from the Balkans by a population that was barred from military service for half a millennium, by a state with no immigration agency or expulsion program.
It’s different. He tried to explain that in a previous video as well. In that case most of the Turks and this includes a lot of non Turkish muslims were actually willing to go to Turkey and the Turkish government was more than happy to accept them. In this case these people are extremely unwilling to leave and their homelands don’t want them back.
@@irksomecodger9667 What a ridiculous notion. Imagine believing that any civilian willingly picked an upwards of 500 kilometer transcontinental journey in an empire with food shortages after giving up all your land and property.
Not to mention the fact that the "Turkish government" literally didn't even exist at that point in time, but was rather an Ottoman bureaucracy straight from the Middle Ages.
It seems to me like you assume that the Greek-Turkish population exchange is analogous to the massacres and cleansings of the Balkan Wars, something that just isn't true.
The average peasent who participated in such was desperately poor and exceedingly bigoted along with being generally tough from years of mountain farming something that can't be sad about modern populations 😭
6:20
Saudi Arabia isn't a military powerhouse by any stretch of the imagination. Their military is generally highly unmotivated and lazy.
Your numbers are way way far from the truth , most saudi ( men and women ) actually work in the private sector , and i am talking about millions of Saudis.
Yes , saudi have many foreigners workers .
Most of them wark in the construction and services sectors .
For example
My wife is a teacher working in a private school for 8 hours a day and her salary is about 1500 us dollars a month .
My son is a mechanic engineer working for a private sector company and his warking hours from 9:00 in the morning to 17:00 ( 8 hours) for 2000 us dollars a month .
I worked for the government for 40 years as a computer programmer ( i am retired right now) .
So 2/3 of my family is working in the private sector and this actually the trend in saudi arabia as the government are encouraging this path .
They mean the real private sector as in doing the difficult jobs not subsidized by the government. Although saudi arabia has started to employ more saudis in the economy.
Your *SON* is a mechanical engineer. Sun ☀️ is the sky fire ball. Otherwise your English is really good 😊. Hope this helps!
Yes, and also he is incorrect about Somali people getting departed enmass from Saudi Arabia. Somalis are not allowed to work in the Kafala system because of the Arab league. Many Ethiopians claim Somali to take advantage of this. Also, Saudi pays for flight ticket if Somali person is unable to get back home. Most of this is not true. Ofc, the situation in Europe is dire as you see in the comment section....
@@LucasFernandez-fk8se
Thanks , it did .
English is my second language .
So
Misspelling happens sometimes .
It may not be possible in the west at least for now,but in the Balkans things are different. Bulgaria becomes more ethnically Bulgarian every year thanks to gypsies and turks going to Germany or turkey while young Bulgarians who went abroad are returning in droves. Also the birth rate is slowly climbing up. And the young people in my school are not liberals at all. I study in what is considered one of the most liberal schools in the capital and here, we the 18year olds talk about the bs in western Europe and more and more people start talking about the ,,austrian painter" with the teachers and noone will tell you anything. The things we talk about will get you expelled in Germany 😂. Also the younger boys see us as role models and copy us. Also since the pension system is bs a lot of people start investing by having many kids from an early age or at least think about it.
bulgarias population has been on the decline for awhile now last year the population shrank by 0.6% thats alot for a country of 6 million, seems ur engaging in wishful thinking, even russia is now importing millions of african migrants, the west is lost
Bulgaria should work to fix that
@@taknoef9195 at least we are ethnically stable. Safe home safe country. The birth rate will naturally rise and we will once again have a natural growth. I just hope that the western Europe takes in immigrants for a long time to come because we still have a liberal, corrupt government. But that will be solved as well since the far right is rising. Stay in Sweden and don't bring your liberal bs here.
@@taknoef9195 When did Russia start importing millions of Africans?
So you're basically admitting most of our young males are nazis? Thank you for encouraging me even more to immigrate as soon as I finish school!👍
Last time I was this early there was no migration crisis
There is no migration crisis.
Hello! Great work on this video as usual Kaiser! As a Saudi, I think I have a bit of insight into the matter that can help correct some misconceptions. Sorry... this may be long. I know you read the comments often, so I want to do my part in giving you the best I have.
So, first point: You mentioned that Saudi is attempting to change its absolute monarchist/theocratic/totalatarian state. This is really far from the truth. Is it trying to get the broader world to accept those things more, and perhaps overlook it if they disagree? Yes. Is it changing it? No. I don't think I need to explain why a monarch wouldn't want to abolish his own monarchy, and the citizens are seruously devout and religious that secularism is out of the question. So theocratic monarchy it remains.
Second, you explained how Saudi citizens barely do work (at least in the public sector) and get quite a padded pay. Yes, this was absolutely true. Emphasis on was. Before 2016 this was the reality. No work, a lot of money, no taxes, etc. Im sure youve heard of Vision 2030. While to a foreigner its highlighted by these crazy projects you hear about, internally it has also done a lot of massive changes. Public jobs are now mych harder and more competitive and effective than private jobs. My father for example, who worked on a project in the public sector, would often work 12-16 hours a day. This is very known now, and surprisingly, most of us see it positively. People celebrate that we now seem to be building our own country, and actively working in it. "Saudisation" is everyone's favourite term. Its the limiting of foreigners into specific jobs, and this applies to both public and private, and high-skilled and low-skilled work. While pre-2016, any Saudi was basically guranteed a well paying job, now it is seriously, uncompromisingly competitive. Also, a good proportion of women work, and most who don't have done part time job, and don't work. So in conclusion, goverment jobs have gotten much harder and pay a fair amount less. Economic restructuring isn't just for show.
Third point, you mentioned how Saudis are for the measures against illegal immigration. Yes. Most Saudis are also against the massive legal immigration, hence the government's Saudisation (quoteas for saudis in various jobs in the private and punlic sectors) work.
Fourth, you pointed out that Saudi operates on a social contract where the state monopolizes power in exchange for welfare, high standards of living, etc, and that it is far too centralised, and dissent is practially impossible. This is a favourite of almost any social or economic analysis of Saudi. Its also very stupid. I dont know what source this originates from but its seriously inaccurate. Very evidently so, given that while Saudi's comforting jobs and high pay for citizens, and the lack of taxes, both no longer exist, support, loyalty and nationalism is at an all time high. According to various stats and polls, Saudis are the most optimistic about the future.
So then, whats the basic social framework of Saudi Arabia? Well, unsurprisingly, Islam. Religion is seriously not some aesthetic we put on our flag and national anthem. It is the fundamental brick of our society and culture. As long as Al Sauds, in the eyes of the Saudis, are good Muslims and overall obedient to God and his commands, theyll have the basic support. Think of how the west worships democracy. If a westerner suggested something undemocratic theyll be thrown in a ditch, right after being publicly curicified and fed live mice. Secondly, the government doesnt have the absolute power you often seem to think it does. And it cannot and will not "do things without having to answer to anyone". Anyone who tells you that a ruler can just continuously go against the wishes of his subjects is delusional. We arent in 1300 anymore. Everyone knows the details of what goes on and people DO often oppose decisions. All you need to do is look at the biggest Saudi news account on twitter @SaudiNews50, look at a tweet thats reporting a new rule or decision, you will rarely find a comment section where people are disagreeing or giving their take comfortably. Sometimes nationalists on Twitter try to "cancel" someone for opposing a major decision (as in a celebrity or a major influencer). It becomes a huge trend on twitter, no chance any law enforcement or govermment official doesn't get alerted to it. Nothing happens at all. The goverment on paper and the government in reality are quite different things, where reality is quite more lenient than on paper.
Furthermore, you (the west) continue to fail having even a correct basic understanding of our social structure. Besides obviously not knowing the first thing about Islam, you guys seriously underestimate how serious and huge tribes are as a social force. When King Abdulaziz (the guy you lot call "Ibn Saud"), united Saudi often by marrying into medium and large tribes. This means that most princes and princesses's mothers side often are from various tribes. Often you'll find those princes and princesses maintaining stong relationships with their mothers tribe, as a form of diplomacy. This is something I am sure you all are completely oblivious to. Like... and this might seem like a flex, but im hust trying to demonstrate what I mean, I am only about 3 familial connections away from the current king, king Salman. My mom's aunt is married to someone from the Sudairi family, who are the mother's side of King Salman. She is married to the King's uncle. As in, my mothers direct aunt is the wife of the king's direct uncle. No, I'm not rich for those asking (yet :)). While im a bit closer than the average guy, it remains true that you'll find most people have quite a familial connection to someone somewhere within the royal family.
Now, why is all this necessary? Well, tribes are serious business. Many tribes can, if they wished, create serious chaos that could shatter the country. My tribe for example (sorry, as an Arab it is obligatory to flex your tribe), and a few other's (including my mothers tribe... again... sorry... my dna...), as well as a few other tribes, like the Dawasir, Zahran, etc. Now, obviously, we dont do any of that, because we like the royal family lol, but im saying, the balance of power isnt as you all think. Also, usually the people in the army tend to be from rural areas, which are much more tribal than urban areas. And... if it was to choose between loyalty to the tribe or the goverment, people rural areas find the decision easy. I think the point is made.
So to conclude this point: No, its not becaus the goverment keeps showering us money that ee allow them unchecked power. Its because we continually see examples of them usimg this power in ways we see as positive. As long as that keeps going, we will continue to give them the keys to power.
I hope this helps :)
This is an informative comment; I really learned something new here. I had no idea Saudi society worked that way. While I favor liberal democracy, I recognize that:
(1) Like all political systems, liberal democracy is flawed and cannot turn men into angels, and
(2) it is not the default setting of humanity; we in liberal democracies tend to act as if other systems of governance are weird aberrations from some kind of norm
To us, absolute monarchies feel like relics of the past, since Europe got rid of theirs or reformed them into limited monarchies. We only ever see them in fantasy stories, so they feel almost unreal. Seeing a real one like Saudi Arabia makes us wonder how that’s even possible in the modern age - who’d want to live under a KING? While I can’t speak for everyone, that’s the general idea. I’m glad you explained Saudi in a little more depth.
well maybe Saudis are so positive about their future compared to Europeans is because the West is lead by incompetent old males who have no trust from the population and no believable vision for the future while Saudi Arabia has a young, energetic leader who seems to be competent and has the power to act on his ideas. But let's see if it works out in the end.
@@rawlenyanzi6686 You're very much welcome! I often see videos with millions of views spreading some honestly stupid takes about our country and how it works. RealLifeLore is pretty much a textbook example, 50 minutes of "explaining" Sauidi society and history, getting pretty much everything wrong.
Perhaps it is a side effect of being the center of the world for the past 600 years that things are either your way or no way, and the world must only be seen and analyzed through the same perspective and dimensions as the west. I do try and correct any mistakes I find. Sometimes I get warm responses of people who are really surpised about what seems like a whole different world opening for them. Others call me a government agent. The latter... is much more common lmfao. Westerners seem to have a tendency to think anyone who isn't patiently waiting for the American Eagle of Super Democracy Freedom ™️ to come in with their Freedom and Libertry ™️ to destroy our evil corrupt systems must only logically be a government agent. 🤷♂️
And as an answer to why someone would want to live under a king. I mean, think of it from our perspective. A hundered years ago, we lived in the harshest place in the world. A barren desert with no resources, constant tribal warfare, and hostile neighbours who completely crush any attempt we make to try and create a central state (Ottomans, Persians, Egypt). Today we are some of the richest people in the world, living some of the most comforting lives in the world, with continuous progress forward in terms of economy and standard of living that has yet to hit it's sealing. Then look at the west from an outside perspective. You guys have Biden, Sunak and Macron. You guys had the world in the palm of your hands and you're losing it. Coincidentally, your decline happened to begin around the same time you abolished a lot of your monarchies. You tried to force democracy on our neighbours and they still haven't recovered from your "freedom" and "democracy". From this perspective, surely you can understand why we prefer monarchy?
We went from the raggiest of rags to the richest of riches under one, and you seem to have went from the richest of riches, to squabbling populist beaurocrats who need America to wipe their ass everyday.
I am aware this isn't exactly how things are. I am simply explaining a perspective that we have about you.
We also don't have the "divine right to rule" bullshit Europe had. Your right to be king is measured on how well you uphold Allah's commandments, and how well you do as a king. And certainly, a king is much more effective than a president. A president has to go through stupid beaurocacy, opposition, populism, etc etc etc. A king simply does.
Very simply, we find that the balance of power we strike (through religion and communties), and the natural incentive for a king to be a more long term thinker... probably do his best to have his children inherit a good Kingdom lol, enough security for us to give the King this absolute power (on paper). The King, as everyone else does, knows that religious institutions and tribal communities are no joke. And that he only has as much power as the population gives him. This, to us, is enough "checks and balances", and whatever else we compromise, we are willing to do so in exchange for effective, serious leaders.
Tldr: based alpha chad dictator who does what he wants > beta virgin president who has to constantly ask for permission from unelected beurocrats and big corporations.
@@Nawaf-qk9mu I will say that liberal democracy requires a moral center that can only be provided by religion (in the West’s case, Christianity.) With the sidelining of Christianity in the western democracies after World War I, there is a lot more dysfunction and hypocrisy since the governments no longer have a limiting principle to keep their worst impulses in check. I feel like a lot of freedoms we Westerners take for granted are slipping away, and secularism did nothing to protect these freedoms.
@@rawlenyanzi6686 Certainly so... While I undoubtedly prefer a monarchy, I don't see the issue (yet) with a sharia-compliant republic, where the constitution clearly upholds that Islam is the ultimate judge. I will not say democracy though, I reserve my concession to an Islamic republic.
It's always important to look broadly, and attempt to learn from many sources, even the policies of other countries, but the more starkly different a country is from your own, the less likely its policies are to be fully compatible with yours. That's not to say they can't be implemented, only that enacting them would come at significant difficultly, and even then, whether it will provide lasting success (or more so in this case, be a sustainably popular policy) is up in the air.
Glory to liberal democracy
Yet is still must be done. Hard choices must be made, the hard road is here, we must be willing to fight it, an uphill battle yet we have been here many times before, we must unify this time again, to bring ourselves to a single block that can handle anything that the world will thorw our way. Or if we dont they will kill us off. The petty issues must die now for our suvival as a raicla group, as of now ethnicities are irrelevent in regards to our current situation. We must unite or were fucked.
@@TurtleChad1 I assume you're being ironic.
@@ericjohnson7234 keep living in the dream world
you must be not paying attention. We are winning.@@SuleimanTheMagnificent71618
During the 80s, 150.000 unemployed Turks remigrated from Germany back to Turkey. They were offered around 10.000 DM to leave the country. It is possible.
7 million left to go.
One of two things will happen immigration or massive social unrest due to cultural friction.
European governments should decide what it wants.
In your videos you concentrate on developed or almost developed countries. What intrigues me is the fate of countries which are still relatively poor and are aging rapidly like Brazil, Iran or Thailand. What will happen to them in your opinion?
Look up r/K selection, it'll give you an idea
I suspect they won't be far off of his rapier-like analysis.
They will fracture and implode, or With Leaders with good temperament and intelligence will separate into more than one small region, ceasing to exist in their current form. The transition will be brutal. This is predicted for all countries in Europe, except UK, France , Scandinavia and "possibly" Spain
Well, here in Brazil we are already fucked, so i expect nothing, i just expect another economic collapse
Stagnation/instability for probably centuries.
Economies of scale and general technological and intellectual inertia that US and China have in the context of global economy is impossible to overstate. Rich countries will ALWAYS be able to cause brain drain in every less developed part of the world. In the era of seamless global communications and transport you simply have no way to keep valuable people/companies/resources in "our hands". Until something catastrophic happens to them, the rest of us simply have no room for growth.
When people say things can't stay the same they mean that we cannot continue with the current government and very often system of government. They are fully aware that the current political parties won't admit their mistakes let alone rectify it, and indeed that from the elite perspective what is happening isn't a mistake at all. What they are saying is that they will restructure the political framework as necessary, I think you misunderstand the contemporary climate, we are in a sense politically at some point before 1920, the only thing stopping kinetic action from the (largely disenfranchised) opposition is means and opportunity. If their is a world war then expect for us to reach the post-war period very soon, the demoralisation is already near the Russian provisional government level. Indeed one of the notable things in the current climate is how much the motivation precedes the means.
then we must get the word out to make it clear that the brothere war must not come, we must see past our petty issues and get the people to see us as one group so we can organize and get everything under our control before everyone else organizes ahead of us.
if that means the eu must go, then it must go. We MUST revitalize. OR we are fucked. beyond fucked.
Cutting welfare as well as other benefits we generously hand out will send MANY of these people back. Making life harder for them and then offering a financial incentive to leave to their home country will be tempting. You can also clamp down hard on their cultural practices and make them 'integrate'. Any criminals will be sent back etc. There are definitely ways to make this happen. Also saction weaker countries for not accepting them back. And since its this, or losing the continent forever, i think we shouldnt easily count ourselves out. Its insulting to our ancestors who sacrificed so much to make such a once wonderful place.
The only way this will work is if European governments consciously lower the living standards of their own countries to below that of the migrant source country.
How badly do you want to get rid of refugees? Are you prepared to live on one dollar a day?
The first thing that needs to go is the liberal state.
Nothing ever happens. Look at Brazil to see our future.
There is a lot more n*zism and r*cism in Brazil surprisingly
Want to see even further in the future? Look at Northern India and it's Aryan established caste system.
@@userre85 I'm not sure how that would develop. The Aryans invaded, conquered and established a caste system in their favour. In Europe, the Aryans are the ones under invasion and conquest.
@@chico9805 Irrelevant detail.
Indo-aryans could not go back to the Eurasian urals. Non-European migrants cannot/will not go back to their origin countries.
@@userre85 They dont have to go back to their countries to no longer be in the country anymore.
It will be made to happen. This is just short-sighted defeatism.
This is not an issue of law anymore.
The frog will just boil slower? Denmark is turning browner every year despite their efforts.
No they're not
We also need to talk about the EU. As long as the EU exists it will be impossible to any government to proceed to any reemigration process, or even any real attempt to stop migration.
The post-Brexit UK is the best example that the EU (though not helpful or useful in any capacity) is not the root of these problems. Non-white migration skyrocketed after Brexit (i guess british conservatives prefer endless third-world parasites rather than some eastern european workers lol).
Plus they already have non-whites leading both the UK as a whole and Scotlistan in particular.
@@mauroalexisfernandez2357 kind of funny the most vocal anti immiragrant politicians in uk goverment are from immigrant parents themselves, Rishi, Suella, Kemi
@@taknoef9195 The grift wins, flawless victory lol.
Why is it possible for Hungary and Poland then ? are they not in the EU ?
@@johnybecool2810 lol most immigrants dont even want to live in hungary salaries are too low, even young hungarians have left they have filled up berlin
ΚaiserBauch: Saudi Arabia can successfully stop immigration.
Also KaiserBauch: european countries, the US, Canada, Australia, NZ cannot, because....Africa and Asia have big populations (but this does not apply in the case of Saudi Arabia).
Me: that is a bit 🤡.
I talk about Europe in this video. I have not said a word about US, NZ, Canada or Australia. I also did not say further immigration could not be stoped, I am talking about large scale remigration. And I never said the reason is large population of Asia and Africa :D
@@kaiserbauch9092
I misunderstood then. Did you happen to just flag any of my comments by the way? Because I just received the well known message by RUclips, that I violated "community guidelines" concerning "h@te speech".
@@tomorrowneverdies567I'm pretty sure RUclips has an automated system that does that
@@tungsten8332 that is for sure 😛
@@kaiserbauch9092
What about sending them to the "anglosphere" instead of their homelands.
After seeing your viewership stats I feel so special as a women 😂😂😂😂😂😂
You’re still getting replaced woman or not. 🎉 total yt 💀
@@JamzYamz7No
@@JamzYamz7 it's strange how biracial kids have such a high level of infertility 🫢
Obama adopted his daughters, Drake isn't the father and Andrew Tate can't have children
@@JamzYamz7Why are biracial kids infertile when the father is black? Why did Obama adopt his daughters.
The tiger and lion can have a baby but they are always infertile.
@@JamzYamz7Migrants are forced to be vaccinated. Infertile workers are better workers.
I think you're being too critical. Times are changing and I think if anything, re-immigration is becoming more and more acceptable in the minds of the public. The real problem is fertility rates
Germany deported thousands of Georgians last year like my neighbor so it can happen if migranta are from relatively civilized countries
They aren't 'civilized'. Georgians are sicilians of eastern europe. Wherever they go they form mafia and mobs.
Germany has a lot of power over Georgia as a trade partner and Georgia is mostly happy to accept given it's low unemployment rates...
The UK and France would gladly take the Danish model over what they have now.
Not there goverments
The Danish model doesn't work.
We are being replaced too, just slightly slower.
Thank you RUclips for deleting my comments!
Same shit is happening to me smh
got to comment in another language it can be anything except for english
You and me both when i proposed the idea of sending them to Canada.
They only pseudo-ban most comments. If you sort them by newest, rather than the default option, you will see the comments. This is very obvious and easy to see under videos with only few comments
The comments are deleted and this is why you can't tell! Do not think that your comment section represents anything meaningful! Please do not forget this!
RUclips is the one that does the deleting, not the channel owner
you got to comment in another language to say anything useful on youtube now
do you mean that he delets crtisim ?
The comments are not deleted, unless RUclips gives you a pop up saying it was deleted. You need to sort the comments by "newest", to see them all. They are effectively shadow-banned like this
People are coping hard in the comments.
I'm fascinated by countries sitting on their hands because of their own rules
21:40 the thing is about the Pakistani and Iranian immigrants is that they propose a risk to these countries as they would run the risk of returning with anti regime policies
Honoured to be a part of the first 100 viewers of a Kaiser video
Again, just implement a 0 child policy on the non-european populations.
How?
What if a woman's already pregnant, then what?
@@bonganimkhwanazi2081fetus deletus
how will ur pension get paid then? your population is already aging
@@taknoef9195 Have your own kids to take care of you.
@@bonganimkhwanazi2081 become pro-abortion.
Author of this video with his super objective approach is actually rather naive and doesn't understand how politics works. Even if you understand that remigration is impossible it still makes sense to support narratives about remigration because if there are non-marginal people in society who talk about remigration then conversations about the necessity to almost completely limit immigration (without remigration) will not look radical and far-right. Most political movements becomes successful not when they chooses the single most rational or most radical strategy but when there are different strategies each of which has a certain benefit. Radicals and utopians may not come to power but their presence contributes to changing the political environment and less radical people are seen as reasonable moderates.
He may not be naive and instead is spreading demoralization propaganda.
You underestimate the lengths we are willing to go to.
Wir sind ein Kessel, der Druck aufbaut. Das ist klar.
bro watches some random n*zi propaganda film and thinks he's him lmao
how old are you
@@Sajid_A829 Why does it matter to you?
@@salzigerfranz1291 you sound like a phase one grows out of
so you're saying its over
its never over unless you belive it s over.
its already over because those in power want it to be
@@ericjohnson7234 youll just continue to pope until the end i guess
hah. if only you knew.@@Rootiga
@@JoblessJoshua Then I guess those in power will have to find another job.
I am sorry babe I can't hang out on valentines. Kaiserbauch uploaded a new video.
🌚You can put a baby in her after watching the video
And that's China is the only of the ancient civilizations that survived in its unchanged form till these days. Why? Because they are not naive.
Unchanged? They've had more revolutions than I can count, both social and political.
ATT: Please answer this question with research. "Why are Hungary and Poland so different and yet very similar ?"
They are both Turkic Turanic countries 💪💪
DENMARK MENTIONED??!! DENMARK MENTIONED??!!
Is this channel a "safety valve"? Just wondering.
Seems like those are its intentions, but nothing this niche can be a safety valve.
Seems like it. He blatantly disregarded the idea of sending them to other liberal democracies like Canada.
Watch europe the last battle and youll understand
Is it still on Twitter
This is probably the first channel i’ve seen discuss and look at this in such a objective and debate type way without any uneeded xenophobia. It feels like a genuine covereage rather then political pandering to whatever side, very well done man! I’m subbed
It’s funny you mentioned your viewers are far right or very anti immigration, i am neither of those. I think we are entering a time where even the left people who are in the middle are concerned about this.
you can still see the delusion in the comment section here when people parrot the exact same pointless positions that Kaiser already talked about here or in his previous video, without any genuine justification or reasoning as to why their positions have any weight. if this kind of absolute brainrot didn't infect so many in the anti-immigration political sphere, we wouldn't have lost so much.
The comment section is very clearly one sided.
These points are giving me brain damage. Why are their points so lopsided and poorly built at best?
Agreed what you said about leftists being concerned. I think we’re also beginning to enter a time where this whole Islam/immigration issue won’t be a left or right issue, but more simply just common sense. I hope this will be the mindset everyone takes
@@kv4648 my comment was deleted, so ill just post a more kid-friendly version: never underestimate the copium and absolute lack of foresight in the the far right. I've tried (for years) to explain these same issues and past mistakes to others all over, and they just say the same thing over and over again. What changes in the real world? Nothing as usual lol
@@kv4648 it would really help you argument if you actually wrote those points rather then nothing of substance. But sure i'll agree to some extent.
European countries should leave EU and US and does whatever need to save demographic.
I agree.
the thing is there is already inflation biting their ass every day. Doing that now will be such a BIG BIG blow to the economy of any resigned country
@@beach2787 good. fuck the economy.
UK leaving the EU has only made things worse, legal and illegal immigration is higher than ever. We need to be more like the EU country Denmark.
@@bristoled93 because uk is vassal state of usa
Denmark is onto something! Germany, France, UK, etc. should take note and adjust their policies accordingly.
Family unification should NEVER be a priority. Most of the migrants are young men -- Let them marry a first
generation citizen from their own ethnic group rather than bringing over a (usually a child) bride. (Most
European women do not want them)
I thought conservatives believed that family break-up was a scar on society?
I am an American and just from anecdotal experience I must say EU migrants are far more damaging than US migrants. Of course I am not looking forward to the demographic decline of white America and I have my own gripes with our immigration policy in the US, but at least Latin American migrants have some European cultural DNA (Speak European Languages, are largely Catholic, Offshoot of western values). Being that Europe is so close to the middle east and Africa It truly saddens me to think you are forced to take on people who are often so openly hostile to the west and unwilling to assimilate into European culture. Additionally, the Mormons and Amish of the US have very good birth rates and have predominantly white European ancestry, say what you will about their beliefs but these small bastions of growth are something to celebrate if we are to preserve western culture and values. However, and correct me if im wrong, Europe dosent even seem to have these holdouts. I wish all of my European friends out there the best for what is to come in your future, I ask that you really do fight to maintain your homeland. As an American I can say the world would be a far worse place without Europe and its contributions, and i hope to never see the day that becomes a reality.
America has like 200 million whites and was popping out 2 million whites for every 4 million babies born until recently so you are good for a while
As a first generation latino american you are spot on. Our geographic distance from Africa and Asia is a huge advantage.
Europe is dying far worse and quicker than the USA.
I am 75, and live in Nebraska, USA. When young, most of the kids inmy school had ancestors who arrived in America before our Revolution. Now I live in Omaha and the Omaha Public Schools are heavily Hispanic, with some schools where Hispanics, Blacks and Asians are all more common than the white kids who were almost universal when I was young.
I spent the first 20 years of my life in Colorado before leaving in 2020, and it was the exact same. At least half of all students in all the schools (regardless of public or private) were hispanic. I moved to Idaho in 2020 and things are the way they should be, the way things USED to be.
You guys need to relax. Hispanics in the US become Americanized within 1-2 generations like clockwork. Source? My grandmother came over the rio grande with no documents, and now I don't even speak spanish and am bassically fully American. I honestly don't get the hype from either side. I am just being my individual self
I like how your analysis are always with a realistic outlook and free from personal bias. People are often full of delusional wishful thinking when it comes to certain topics. As far as I understand, the original concept of remigration is more of a set of policies setting economic and social incentives rather than forceful mass deportations.
Yep. Sadly, there are too many people spouting their fantasies as some inevitability. For the foreseeable future, so long as the bulk of Europe remains strongly liberal democratic, they will *always* be friendly towards immigration, "human rights", and universal adult suffrage.
These policies do benefit the national economy compared to autocracies that jumble the laws that makes it difficult for business to thrive -- but it comes at a cost of culture.
@@kafon6368 Idk, I'm not a fan of the culture of such autocracies either. The extreme repression of women's rights in the gulf states, or paranoid homophobia in Russia, may be culturally stable, but that doesn't mean they are good!
@@alexpotts6520 Yeah, life is give-and-take. You give up a benefit in order to take another benefit. A shame the West's material fortune comes at a cost of its cultural cohesion.
The problem is over-population in countries outside Europe in the global south. It's apparent these countries are incapable of meaningful economic and social development, the examples of South Africa and Zimbabwe are highly instructive. So as long as there is food available from countries that produce surpluses to fuel the population expansion and the surplus population can be exported the problem will only ever get worse. At some point the target countries economies will seriously decline due to over-population. The big issue will be water availability. I anticipate that at some point there will be catastrophic famines affecting multiple countries, it's not going to pretty. Famines and population crashes will serve to exacerbate the issues because fertility rebounds strongly after a famine, as shown by the examples of African countries affected by major famines as well as Inda.
our global "civilization" is obese and has cancer, and must exercise and go through chemotherapy.
correct
Europe will become more conservative based on Muslim voters with women and LGBT paying the price.
Funny enough LGBT and women are the biggest supporters of Muslims
If there is ever a will, it can be done. But the question is ‘should it be done’ considering the consequences and fanaticism required to carry it out.
I’m an immigrant from the Balkans myself and I love the U.K. where I live and am a citizen.
I’m a skilled professional, if I had to be removed by force I’d probably fight to stay… all my property, investments, network, contacts etc are here so I’d be destroyed if I got deported.
I think we have to halt new illegal immigration now
I love how Greenland is so big and Denmark is so small that when he said that he was going to do a case study on 2 countries I thought the second one was Greenaldn
TND
"Armless" is not correct here. You mean "unarmed".
Please consider doing case study in Germany, Sweden and Polish.
Another great video, could you do a video on Japan and South Korea, they already have quickly reducing populations but are not resorting to migration.
ruclips.net/video/w8MEUD0wylY/видео.html
Both have recently increased entrance of foreign workers and immigration actually
the migrants in question are mostly guest workers with no economics rights or path to citizenship.
Are you living in some other universe?
The only reason I am even interested in this is because OTHER people see it as an existential threat. So I do not have the luxury of ignoring them. But they, in return, could not care less about what I consider existential threats : the emancipation of fools and tied to that the fact that higher educated people get fewer children. And climate change. That what I worry about far more. So I struggle to give them what they want because they will NEVER return the favour, they don't want me to have it.
climate change is a non-issue, a scam more then anything else, it will be forgotten as an issue when this existential crisis becomes full circle.
bigger problems are things like the UN, the USA, Israel, Russia, Saudi-Arabia, NGO’s, lobby groups, online censorship, big tech domination of global markets, risk of ww3 due to competition with China and Russia.
if you want high IQ people, then some kind of rightwing progressive movement would be nessisary but we are a long way from that.
@@golagiswatchingyou2966 lol farmers are running out of water, europe is getting hotter each year, keep deluding yourselve its a scam
You assume to much. People Like US are desillusioned w the world. We See that the Establishment hates us and actively works towards Our total ethnical and cultural annilihation and "climate Change" IS obviously Part of this Plot. ITS Not that WE dont Take your wellbeing seriously ITS Just the fact youre worried about Something that will affect you NOT AT ALL while Not giving the slightest Shit that Out cities are running to rubble and chaos
Love that I found your channel.
Your knowledge of this subject is evident, and your realism is undeniable.
I have always thought remigration to be unrealistic, and aiming for it to be politically counterproductive.
The best outcome that is politically attainable is the stopping of new immigration, and even that is going to be a giant uphill battle.
Western populations simply will not stomach the harshness which would be involved in a serious remigration effort, pushing for it will alieanate moderates.
A future where Western Europe ends up with a population that is still 70% european is a liveable future. Birthrates of immigrant populations are dropping fast, a bright spot which more people should acknowledge.
I think countries like France with their vast empty farm lands should pay religious family to have a farming community based on Catholicism and high birth rates
Oh wow, i commented a while back asking you to look at the demography of saudi Arabia... Ill watch it on my way to work... as a saudi i think i may have unique insight into some things, so allow me to make comments and possible corrections or context once i do watch it! Thanks once again! Youre a legend!
Ill make it a seperate comment, i wanna reserve this as thanks!
I love your videos, I appreciate the thought, research, and hard work that goes into them. Watching them has taught me a great deal about the world, I am thankful that you share this information with us 😊
I have a movie recommendation for you: Dunki, the Bollywood movie that came out in 2023 starring Shahrukh KHan.
In the end, it's all about the reason why people are going far right in Europe.
Simply being anti immigration is not enough anymore if your ideal Europe is the one from the past.
Let's wait and see what happens
I would be interested in a video on the demographics of the gulf countries
Arabs are a minority already in their own nations
Man
I watched video of 15 years old who is married when he is 14 years old and he is now a father and he speaks as if he is very mature 30 years old man.. they get married in young age and they get ALOT of children and they still can provide them very very well
You also need to understand that europe doesnt have many natural resources and so european companies get them from poor african countries by hook or by crook so if europe decides to strong arm those poor nations they might just start takinga actions against European companies. Saudi arabia on the other hand has oil the most important resource and can basically import the rest
Demographic change might be permanent, but we can still save the secular culture if we start to fight for it. We can still decide if we become like Iran/Saudi or like Spain/Malta. Spain and Malta both has some arabic influences, but both stand firmly in the Christian tradition. Democracy might be over though, we probably cannot save the future if we put our faith in inept women, socialists and the enemy who is already inside our borders and vote together with us in our elections. What Europe needs is a right wing military takeover and an iron fist rule that puts an end to feminism, wokeism and islamism, and promotes values such as secularism, freedom and the idea of a republic.
You have to make sure that secularism does not let intolerant faiths take over. Paradox of Tolerance needs to be accounted for.
Many of these ideas seem mutually contradictory, non-democratic republicianism, etc. I don't want a secular society I want Christian monarchy, local autonomy and a crusade.
Yes, let's hope that a military takeover upholds republican values. That has never backfired before.
Yes, let's preserve the very same culture which destroyed us in the first place. Great plan.
cry harder you are getting replaced
Many thanks for your perspective. Hope my message finds you. Ever since I watched "Europa The Last Battle," I have this strong feeling that Europe will be islamised by design. Can you make a video on "Islamisation of Europe?" We need to be prepared if that is the case.
Thank you very much!
Islamification wont happen. It failed to take root in india despite hundreds of years of muslim rule. Many muslims are also not actually muslims. Reforming islam is the way to go.
Who do you think are the ones doing this replacement ?
@@danielpaduret5491 for example, if you look at arab spring, syria refugee crisis, ukraine war (energy price increase in europe), red sea crisis (trade goods from china price increase), gaza cricis (refugees to be setteled in europe), the war is on Europe, not Russia
@@murkhuddindalal The war isn't in Europe, Europe is just getting the effects of the wars in other continents. Every country around the world loose to these conflicts except the USA as always.
no blackpills
There are plenty of examples of remigration in history. Just a matter of doing it.
People tend to remigrate during times of war 😉
Read em weep boys and girls!
Mass deportations are completely possible and happened several times in recent european history.
Nice copium
Yooo, Syria I mean Denmark is going to be sick this summer to visit. I'll have to check out all the new mosques
Could you do a video about the demographics of the UK? There seems to be a lot of variables unique to their situation on the topic of migration and demographics in general, for example the consequences of being the birthplace of the Industrial Revolution and the waves of migrants that left the isles overtime.
Bro you have the mindset that there aren’t bold people out there with balls that can get into power and do some stuff. You think “oh well the numbers say this and you can’t fight back” nah bro that’s not how the real world works
I really hope you're right man. This evil must stop.
That’s exactly how the real world works, you aren’t going to do anything
Europe's politics will be very different in 20 years than it is today. This channel's owner has difficulty believing that. Countries don't need agreements. Immigrants just have to choose to self deport.
God bless Saudi Arabia.