That's part of the problem. The studies don't designate any specific details abut height! You'll see in another video that I present the studies on risk factors for ovarian cancer as "flimsy, flakey, and fakey." Now you see why.
That's the problem. The studies are not specific. In another video, I present how "flimsy, flakey, and fakey) the studies on risk factors are. This is an example of that.
Height = Altitude. So I have three A’s out of four. 😳 What is the base height? I’ll be able to determine my percentage of risk factor for me when I know. Very interesting statistics having to do with personal profile and my risk for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
@@MenopauseTaylor I should not be surprised. You have made me aware of studies to where I am asking what ages were the women…and more when I listen to others. ☺
I always thought height was based on genetics. What is considered tall?
That's part of the problem. The studies don't designate any specific details abut height!
You'll see in another video that I present the studies on risk factors for ovarian cancer as "flimsy, flakey, and fakey." Now you see why.
Thank you. I just learned so much!😊😊😊
You are ever so welcome, my dear Christine.
For every 2" extra in height beginning from what height? From 5' ?
That's the problem. The studies are not specific.
In another video, I present how "flimsy, flakey, and fakey) the studies on risk factors are. This is an example of that.
Height = Altitude. So I have three A’s out of four. 😳
What is the base height? I’ll be able to determine my percentage of risk factor for me when I know.
Very interesting statistics having to do with personal profile and my risk for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
There IS no base height. (I think it's really weight that matters, rather than height.) But they studied height for some odd reason!
@@MenopauseTaylor I should not be surprised. You have made me aware of studies to where I am asking what ages were the women…and more when I listen to others. ☺