latency control test with Smaart and Yamaha Ql1

This is a control test I do to confirm the accuracy of my latency testing on equipment. every good test / experiment should have a control to prove or disprove the methodology and results of the testing. I will be doing latency testing on most of Yamaha's pro audio equipment ( Yamaha dm3, dm7, cl5, ql1, ql5 , Ruio16 ) - This video is the control for that testing.
Subscribe -➡️ / @kineticprofessionals
Facebook -➡️ / kinetic-professionals-...

[@KINETICPROFESSIONALS]

Couple notes * at the start when I said 5 seconds , I meant 5 ms. Additionally, I want to emphasize- this is not meant to be the complete latency testing of the Ql series. This is simply showing my process and methodology for control testing. If you think I made an error or this can be done better , please let me know in the comments.

[@aligato]

i'm curious about making this test with a QL5, CL5 to compare.
And when you are network with a RIO your latency just depend on the Dante latency or does it sum with the local 2.23ms latency ?
Btw if you got the datasheet of this test i'm quite interested in !
Thanks you the video and the knowledge sharing !

[@KINETICPROFESSIONALS]

@@aligato actually started testing that! I was working on ql1 to ql5. I clocked 2.23 with ql1 and 2.27 with ql5. Haven’t finished cl vs Ql yet.