bought the monitor for 175$ on a black week sale in Poland, its great. definitely a big upgrade from aoc c24g1, no ips glow, 240hz from 144hz, 2560x1440 from 1080p is also a game changer.
For me, I like that type of monitor, but I wish if some portable monitor has G sync support because even there’s a new graphic card that does not support G sync or AMD monitor
It’ll be nice if you do a type of graphic card called the Intel arc B580 directly to an EGPU set up either a type of handheld or a mini PC or just both because there’s a new Intel graphic card released this year in 2024 closer to 2025
Great specs but response time is average and it doesn't have good motion blur reduction technology. Pretty much all monitor manufacturers say their monitor has 1ms response time but actually their monitors have 4 to 7ms average response time which is terrible. Only LCD monitors like Asus pg248qp 540hz TN monitor has under 2ms average response time. LCD display technology still has lot of room to improve their response time but the problem is most of LCD monitor manufacturers are focusing on Lower power consumption rather than improving the response time.
This was tested by zWormz the guy who tests GPU's. he used an LDAT tool, and found that the monitor response time, after tweaking it a little is around 3.7 MS. If you think, that 1.7 ms make such a big difference, your delusional.
@@quaza8515 смотрел его видео, только не особо понял его измерения и какие были настройки монитора. Не спец в английском. Можешь подсказать, пожалуйста?
Igorslab also review it. With OD at level 2 they got an average of 3,7 ms at 240hz, 3 ms at 200hz and 3,2 ms all the way down to 60hz. At level 3 the average was 2,7 ms at 240hz, 2,3ms from 200 to 144hz and 3ms from 100 to 60hz but below 200hz they got inverse ghosting so only usable if you can maintain 240 fps. OD top speed was unusable as they got 46% overshoot at 240hz with 1,3ms response time though
@@quaza8515 you are the most delusional cluster fk if you can't see the difference between 1.5ms average response time at 540hz and 3.7ms response time at 240hz. 3.7ms average response time is a ghosting mess at 240hz.
bought the monitor for 175$ on a black week sale in Poland, its great. definitely a big upgrade from aoc c24g1, no ips glow, 240hz from 144hz, 2560x1440 from 1080p is also a game changer.
Yeah, great deal!
Na jakiej stronie go kupiłeś? Sprowadziłeś z Amazona czy kupiłeś od jakiegoś resellera z polski?
Do you think you need 240 Hz for competitive gaming?
For me, I like that type of monitor, but I wish if some portable monitor has G sync support because even there’s a new graphic card that does not support G sync or AMD monitor
thanks good video
Best overdrive without using adaptive sync?
интересно было услышать в этом видео русский язык
субтитры?
It’ll be nice if you do a type of graphic card called the Intel arc B580 directly to an EGPU set up either a type of handheld or a mini PC or just both because there’s a new Intel graphic card released this year in 2024 closer to 2025
but it's not compatible with G SYNC right?
I was able to set it up 03:17
@@trysometech52 OK
Подскажи пожалуйста какие конкретно настройки ты используешь ?
Настройки для чего конкретно?
Do the Rog ally X bro
Great specs but response time is average and it doesn't have good motion blur reduction technology. Pretty much all monitor manufacturers say their monitor has 1ms response time but actually their monitors have 4 to 7ms average response time which is terrible. Only LCD monitors like Asus pg248qp 540hz TN monitor has under 2ms average response time. LCD display technology still has lot of room to improve their response time but the problem is most of LCD monitor manufacturers are focusing on Lower power consumption rather than improving the response time.
This was tested by zWormz the guy who tests GPU's. he used an LDAT tool, and found that the monitor response time, after tweaking it a little is around 3.7 MS. If you think, that 1.7 ms make such a big difference, your delusional.
@@quaza8515lol
@@quaza8515 смотрел его видео, только не особо понял его измерения и какие были настройки монитора. Не спец в английском. Можешь подсказать, пожалуйста?
Igorslab also review it. With OD at level 2 they got an average of 3,7 ms at 240hz, 3 ms at 200hz and 3,2 ms all the way down to 60hz. At level 3 the average was 2,7 ms at 240hz, 2,3ms from 200 to 144hz and 3ms from 100 to 60hz but below 200hz they got inverse ghosting so only usable if you can maintain 240 fps. OD top speed was unusable as they got 46% overshoot at 240hz with 1,3ms response time though
@@quaza8515 you are the most delusional cluster fk if you can't see the difference between 1.5ms average response time at 540hz and 3.7ms response time at 240hz. 3.7ms average response time is a ghosting mess at 240hz.
1:20 same bruh same...