While it can one-shot superheavies, it is a lot easier to dodge and imo cluster bombers are better for finishing off tanks rather than killing them from full HP. Still, I should have mentioned it because it is still a viable choice.
@@RazzmannWG just asking why do you prefer it, that's all And I agree overall, when chipped SH retreats into smoke cloud you want better coverage over meme AP. Additionally it is that much better against other soft targets hidden in forests
So I've been an active wargame watcher for a while but I kind of fell out of trying 1v1s and ranked games and have mostly stuck to tactical. Could you give a layout--and maybe this is a video idk you do you--on the way the tank meta has changed in the last few years? I'm still very much going by the model of the superheavy being king and from your decks that doesn't seem like it's the case
@@berg_sand2373 swedish one is still good but generally better to have more bombs covering a wider area so your opponent can't move vehicles away as easily
While it can one-shot superheavies, it is a lot easier to dodge and imo cluster bombers are better for finishing off tanks rather than killing them from full HP. Still, I should have mentioned it because it is still a viable choice.
I Otomatically clicked on this video.
Always nice to see continued content for this game. Keep it coming man
USA next could be pretty pog
NORAD could be even better
No 2 cards of recon M41?
HERESY
M8 is also a pretty good option
Loving these! Can't wait for Red Dragons :smugpepe:
Scandinavia would automatically be shit without automatic choices like the Otomatic which is so automatically good to the point of automaticity.
Would be neat to see you do Red Dragons and go over possible tactics to overcome their many shortcomings.
I can save you the time: the only possible tactic is to helorush ;)
@@RazzmannWG mi 25 go brrrr
Too short. It isn't a razmann video if it isn't at least 30 min.
Would you please consider to do an update on your crash course on wargame?
Eventually, for sure
Viggen und Siegen (its a saying in my gaming Group and it saved our asses many times) (= Viggen and wining)
Why block 5 cluster? Isn't cluster viggen better?
While it can one-shot superheavies, it is a lot easier to dodge and imo cluster bombers are better for finishing off tanks rather than killing them from full HP. Still, I should have mentioned it because it is still a viable choice.
@@RazzmannWG just asking why do you prefer it, that's all
And I agree overall, when chipped SH retreats into smoke cloud you want better coverage over meme AP. Additionally it is that much better against other soft targets hidden in forests
What about Draken WONS? I find it a very successful bomber with higher ecm than the f16 but it lacks IR missiles
Decent bomber for sure!
So I've been an active wargame watcher for a while but I kind of fell out of trying 1v1s and ranked games and have mostly stuck to tactical. Could you give a layout--and maybe this is a video idk you do you--on the way the tank meta has changed in the last few years? I'm still very much going by the model of the superheavy being king and from your decks that doesn't seem like it's the case
Raz think you could do USA next?? great vid
if you say please I might
@@RazzmannWG Thank you so much for all your vids man!!! I just started playing wargames about 2 months ago and im hooked!
Finland?
Imagine not having M8 as auto include recon.
Why do you use the cluster F16 over the cluster Viggen?
cheaper and 8 more cluster bombs
@@sugoisukhoi doesnt the extra AP make up for it?
@@berg_sand2373 swedish one is still good but generally better to have more bombs covering a wider area so your opponent can't move vehicles away as easily
While it can one-shot superheavies, it is a lot easier to dodge and imo cluster bombers are better for finishing off tanks rather than killing them from full HP. Still, I should have mentioned it because it is still a viable choice.
its op in swedish national
you forgot to put the sk in the air tab.
we need a meme deck building guide next for that one
Razzman, love these new series, but make a fucking redfor deck plzzz pappi. Or do one bluefor and then a redfor...... go so one.
Tldr: LY razpappi
You skipped swedish regular infantry.
yes
@@RazzmannWG do they suck or something
Yeah, the only reason to take them is if you want an STRF9040 with rifle infantry, but you are just better off using CV90s.
@@RazzmannWG What is the difference between CV90 and STRV9040?
@@ivvan497 Better gun and more armour.
They're both CV90, the norwegian one is just a newer model with a different gun.
downvoted for no swedish aircraft