Scandinavia and today's territories of Denmark and northern Germany are the territories of origin of the Germanic ethnic group and haplogroup I1 is base for their identity. Later, they broke into the continental part of Europe and assimilated part of the Celtic and North Slavic population.
@@RackerPaS I am specifically referring to the Slavs who lived in the territory around the Elbe River and Lužice area as well as those around the Alps. However, the term itself refers to the Slavs - from the Czech Republic to Russia (without the Balkans - where the southern branch lives).
Yeah, they’re actually my two favorites, because they are the best people, with the best morals. They’re also the best looking, and the most intelligent, which is why they’ve been the most successful, at the most important things. They are two of the most supreme, master groups, without a doubt. That’s why their lives actually matter, of course, and most other people’s don’t.
It really is. For a very long time i thought that Elves, Dwarves, Orks, Trolls and so on were all things imagined up by the makers of games like Dungeons and Dragons. I had no idea that it was from Germanic mythology. I don't mean to bash D&Ds but this mythology became more appealing and interesting to me after that
@@chriswebster24 Wonderful post. Love hearing my people actually having pride and recognition for their natural place in the world. If more people still thought this way, our quality of life would be much greater.
I’m the descendant of the Germanic peoples. Most of my ancestors are from Northern England and Denmark with a smattering of Scottish, Swedish, Norwegian and German thrown in for good measure. This video helped me understand more about my heritage. Thanks.🙏
@@fredriks5090 They are not named after Germany, Germany is just a modern English name for a new nation. The peoplegroup are named by the Romans before England and Germany existed.
The English mixup of Deutsche and Germanen has led to so much confusion and ignorance among people who don’t speak other languages. It gets even weirder when the “German” areas of Germany, Austria, and Switzerland are by far the least Germanic among the countries usually associated with that origin. If only they started calling Germans Dutch and gave the Dutch their proper name of Netherlanders.
@@fridrekr7510 The dutch are called dutch because they called themselves that and Germany is called Germany because that's what the word was intended for. The Romans didn't really know the nordic countries, the word German/Germani probably originates from Belgium. If you look at a population density map of Europe you can see that the Rhine is a major hot spot and this was similar in Roman times. If you could ask a Roman where the Germans live he would point to central Europe and Germany is the country that matches the best with the large area. We have a different perspective on "Germanic" than the Romans even though the concepts is based on theirs because we focus on many later North Germanic sources and try to complete the picture. Northern Germany part of the Germanic Birthplace though and we have important runes that are much older than the Edda in southern Germany. German Switzerland is suprisingly Germanic too, more so than some parts of Germany. "German" and "Deutsch" has essentially gone through the same developement, referering to a wider Germanic population in continental Europe first and then narrowing down towards Germany. The differentiation of dutch and deutsch stands mostly on the fact that "Deutsch" increasingly means high German only and that the dutch use a different name for their language now. Low German is very similar to dutch and still native to large parts of the Netherlands (Nedersaksisch). Similarly Nederfrankisch is also spoken in parts of Germany. Originaly there was one gradient of dialects from the different west-germanic tribes. When they wrote the dutch national anthem around 500 years ago they still emphazised the "duytsch" blood of Willem van Oranje who was from Hessen. Similarly Ludwing von Bayern included dutch icons in his Walhalla memorial Hall for the intention that "All Germans may feel that they have a shared fatherland whatever tribe they are from."
Pennsylvania born germanic person here, sir name Shettler and spoke Pa.PA. deutch (amish) as my first language and just ate Sauer Kraut an pork for supper lol thanks for the video
My Great-Grandfather settled in Morrison Illinois and Iowa around the 1890s. My Grandpa was born in Morrison Illinois and some of his other brothers and sisters were born in Northern Germany
Jeśli z północno wshodnich Niemiec, to może mieć słowiańskie pochodzenie. Bo tam do tej pory nazwy miejscowości, pozostałości archeologiczne i duża część genetycznie jest posłowiańska.
The Germanics are my favorite breed. I love their phenotype and color pallet; Blonde, Red, Brunette, Blue eyes, green eyes, fair skin. Not to mention how their Males mastered Science and made the world what it is.
Yes. its definitely the most influental ethnic group and formed the world as it is today. The germanic people have an incomparable predisposition of creating art and science.
@michaeltsagalakis When I speak of Germanics I refer to the entire northern european breed, basically all Europeans with the exception of Olive skinned, darker haired Europeans who I call the Arab/Germanic hybrids.
I’m Scots-Bavarian-Anglo/Saxon. My college roommate was a Dane. We can speak to each other in three languages. I’ve met them all in Berlin once. Berlin, Copenhagen, and Odense, and Oslo are amazing places full,of wonderful people.
@@leetlbt i tend to associate the word “nice” with rain and cold, while i would associate “warm” (at least the kind of warmth in california) more negatively. but i suppose that's my germanic genes
Nice video! I'm a Frisian (Ingaevones) and I feel connected to Scandinavia and to Denmark in particular. I can't explain it, but I already felt it when I was little. There's something there and it's calling me haha.
Just returned from a two days trip to DK. Nice, really nice country to live in. My such feelings are more oriented to former Prussia, though. The architecture just speaks to me.
@@lowersaxon How nice! We're going to Denmark at the end of this month, where we will stay for a week. We want to go to Ribe (which is a special city for Frisians, since Frisians were involved in the founding of the city. Many Frisians lived and traded there), Odense and Copenhagen. I'm so looking forward to it!
Is het oude Friesland niet groter dan alleen de provincie? Van België, Nederland, Noord Duitsland en Denemarken? Friesland…de Freya’s kinderen, ofwel “vrijheid” als hoogste goed. Ik denk dat je het Oera Linda boek wel gaaf zal vinden! Als je het niet al kent 😊
At the start of the expansion phases, there were therefore at least three major groups that were genetically distinct and homogeneous : on the one hand, the R1a-M417 carriers of Corded Ware, and on the other, two more closely related groups of R1b-Z2103 from the Yamna culture and R1b-L51, who are still poorly represented by ancient samples but are present in Bohemia to the south of the Corded Ware. The descendants of R1a-M417 are the Balto-Slavic and Indo-Iranian language branches, while R1b-Z2103 would have given rise to at least Armenian and Greek, as well as Tocharian languages and possibly Albanian. Finally, descendants of R1b-L51 would have formed at least the Germanic and Italo-Celtic branches, as well as the Lusitanian language.
Very nice video... One remark though: at 17:25 you refer to a "Hünenburg" implying that is the name of the place. The site is called a Hünenburg (literally: a giant fortification or a giant's fortification) and is located in Watenstedt, in Lower Saxony. BTW a few kilometres to the northeast in Schöningen the oldest man-made spears ever discovered were found with an estimated age of 300.000 years..... Germans might be older than we thought.
A very deep and well researched study of the Germanic tribes. I enjoyed he scenery with the folk in costume and your voice. I feel quite connected to this hisory.
@iparipaitegianiparipaitegi4643 Because it's normal to be proud of things and people beyond that of one's own personal achievements. Anyone who disagrees is self-centred and it says a lot about them when they try to pathologise organic nationalism (ie, being very proud of your ancestors and your heritage). It should be us pathologising their maladaptive thinking, not the other way around therefore.
Okay 8 to 9 min in you are discussing a possible eastern movement of the Germanics into central-northern Europe. It made me think of Snorris account in Ynglingasaga of Odin first going to Russian then moving into Saxland then taking over Sweden afterward. Perhaps then if this new paper is right Snorris account has a lot of truth to it, and they had mythological memories of this migration later euhemerized by Snorri.
This is without a doubt the best video on RUclips about the Germanic origins & history!! I’m a big fan of “Getica” by Jordanes. Here in Sweden & Gotland it is highly criticized. But these genetic studies give me a lot of hope. Thanx again for this fantastic video!!
@@FortressofLughI like the fact that you give the legends of origin some credit. Here historians & politicians tend to do all they can to disprove the Nordic origins of the Germanic tribes. (I mean why would it be false? Why would someone lie about their place of origin just like that?). Also countless RUclipsrs seem to have an obsession to mix up Germanic with Celtic cultures and vice versa. I thank you for not doing that 🫶
17:50 we know that there were "atleast 4 people, most of which in their teens, buried in the grave under different periods during the early bronze age". It wasn't a king's grave. Furthermore, there is a neolithic layer beneath it, showing it was a grave site for earlier people aswell.
I’m happy to come from South Eastern Norway. I grew up in an aerea rich in petroglyphs, stoneships, stonecircles, runestones ( Tunesteinen/the Tune stone ) and ships ( Tune/Rolføy ship ). I’m Christian, but I feel a deep connection to my ancestral land.
@@CB-dl1vg not too good, but there’s hope. Most Nordic countries are more sceptic too immigration now and the next Norwegian election will most likely get a very immigration sceptic party a lagre part of the votes. We are not as fucked as Sweden, Germany or especially the UK.
You're a Christian? What does that mean? What does that mean to you? Who is Christ? Who is Jesus? Who are you? Bible says you can not serve 2 masters- Do you serve yourself- your own flesh in a world that will ultimately be destroyed? Or- Do you serve God? I do not feel connected to my ancestry or my land- As I am merely passing through. If you feel (feel?) Connected to the land, then I would go out on a proverbial limb and say you are not a Christian. You decieve yourself. Unless you have repented for your sins, lusts, and adultery- you have not received the spirit of God- the holy spirit who comes into you and sups with you and thee with HE. That is the rebirth- when God removes your stony earthly heart and replaces it with a heart of flesh.
In Germany Odin is called Wotan. The old englisch and old saxon language have the same base (Ænegl-Saxon = Ængeland = England). In the englisch and german weekdays you see some names of nordic gods until today. Wednesday = Wotansday or Thursday = Thorsday or Friday = Freyasday.
My genetic DNA traces to each of these ancient Germanic tribes, including the Steppe cultures and Scandinavian. I have DNA ties to the Goths (Visi and Ostro). Thank you for this nicely put together video.
@@tarakabuddha The data base for archeogenetics can run your DNA through and any matches will come up. Sometimes it is a ‘probability’ or shared, but it can also shared SNP matches which are literally like fingerprints, so definitive.
@@tarakabuddha I feel blessed to know such details, and I love that I have such cool ancestry. I also was DNA matched to the Longobards and the Alemanni. So, I feel so lucky 😍
These migrations are very enlightening. I did a DNA thing & was surprised by the reults (it was mitochondrial so only my mom's lineage) My maternal grandparents immigrated to the US from Austro-Hungary about 100 yrs ago (1918-1920) I expected Germanic & Slavic but got Germanic & Celtic & Scandinavian? This video answers some questions. I knew that the Celts (Keltoi) occupied much of the same territory that the Germantic Tribes did & often wondered if the main difference between them was time & linguistics. ( Already knew Scandi/Germanic was prevalent on my dad's side based on sir names & appearance )
Very interesting video. I live I Norway and my maternal grandfather was from southern Sweden. My genetics at first showed a strong concentration around southeast Norway and southern Sweden. However a more detailed analysis showed me being 58% Norwegian, 21% Swedish and 19% danish and 2% Dutch…
I love finding out another word for a people group refers to a weapon or tool. Saxons - dagger dudes, Angles - hook hoodlums, Franks - axe army. Now the exonym German apparently refers to spears.
The seax, the francia, possibly the geir... Maybe the Langobards is not about long beards but long shafted bardas (axes) like how the hiłlebard was named?
Anglo Saxons were Israelites ie Shemites ie Black people. Stop lying. See Anacalypsis by G Higgins. Some of us went to good schools and the library. Shalom
I wonder if the Vanir are are result of the Celtic people of Austria and Southern Germany being absorbed. As Norse myths speak about how the Aesir and the Vanir went to war with the Aesir winning.
Austrians in particular developed very late and were a result of bavarians mixing with slavs to the east (austria meaning eastern realm, describing the earlier bavarian east march). Bavarians themselves are at its core marcomanni from the bohemian woods (bavarri meaning man of bohemia). Now the name of bohemia is of germanic origin and means home of the boi, which was a celtic tribe. So that would be a clear case of the marcomanni absorbing a large amount of celts. I do think we would have to go much earlier than that though since its norse myths, probably contact between germanic and celtic people in jutland like the cimbri and teutons.
Very unlikely that those myths have been spread as far north as Scandinavia. Bute likely that the Asar - Vaner war reflects the conflict between the indo-europeans and the earlier population of Scandinavia ( Funnel Beakers) The Asar are the Indo-European Gods anf the Vaner the earlier Scandinavian gods.
THE CRUEL ACTS OF CHARLEMAGNE WILL NOT BE FORGOTTEN. If you Americans really are "proud" of MY Indo European culture then actually be proud of the last REAL Germanic tribes who continued to follow their ancestors beliefs. "I rather die a Heathen with my family in Hel, than live with my enemies in heaven" - Redbad King of Frisia
So glad your video came up on my RUclips feed! Thank you for all your hard work. BTW have you considered having the amulet reproduced? I would love to have a couple...
Thank you for this very informative video. I have always been interested in learning populations true origins in the world and now it is being confirmed by DNA.
Interesting and a good compilation of facts of "Germanic people". MY heritage too as I am a rather stereotypical with natural blonde hair.😄That is also backed up if I read my own DNA test as I am a Swede who have 79% Scandinavian, 11 % Finnish and 10 % Baltic heritage genes. The sea (Baltic sea), unites rather than separate as it is a quicker way to travel and not an obstacle. These genes are of course not "native" from the beginning of time but echoes to current regions. Also interesting to note the different ways the Germanic people spread and got assimilated to varying degree in other areas. Also the flows back of Celtic/Germanic mixed populations and that it was not just "spreading out".
Something I actually wondered was how much genetic traces the Romans left in Southern and Western Germany. I'm German, but I look somewhat more Southern European. I always theorised about having some legionaries in my ancestry 😅...
That is very likely Celtic ancestry. Something I mention in the video is that continental Celts were more akin to southern Europeans. They had a higher percentage of Neolithic farmers ancestry
I could be wrong about this but Im pretty sure the last line on the amulet says unharmed bac(k) home, not unharmed safe home as you have written in the description. I would assume they didnt add the k in back because the anglo-frisian futhorc did use have a k. Love the channel, keep up the good work!
Nah man dont put salt in the wound. Germany is not united 2/3 of our country is missing. And to even say this is seen as extremist. The part where the saxon (not anglo saxons) come from is pommern and nord east prussia the saxons are one of the greatest german tribe of which our people are. Our home was given to poland and when you are not fine with it you are a n@zi. This is so sick.
But germani of roman era can also be latin word, garrio manni, man who chatter/speak babble (in the ears of romans), but, yeah spearmen are much cooler.
Not really. The Latin word for man is vir and you do not arrive at the form "Germani" by adding "garrio". That is not how Latin morphology and phonetics work.
Not sure about "spearmen" either. If that were to be derived from gaizaz, it would require rhotacism at a very early stage. For comparison, Gothic still had intervocalic z/s there in the 4th century AD.
I had not heard of the Germanic-Celtic continental tribes going back into Scandinavia and altering their DNA, culture and language, but it's interesting to consider. Peoples move and change due to that and there is not one "pure" people even though some might want to believe that. Cool episode, thanks!
The sacrifices in the moors of Scandinavia (and Jutland) are constant in a period from 400 b.c to 600 AD. Its the same places which gets the sacrifices = the locals must have stayed ,even after lost battles. In Jutland there was a turfwar between the Anglians (which had their "capitol" close to todays eckernförde,Very N-Germany) and a people living between the Jutes and the anglians in todays southern Jutland (Todays Denmark) .After these people were ethnically cleansed by the Anglians,the turf war took another character between Jutes and Anglians The anglians lost,and around 450-500 they probably were absorbed into the jutes. This war has left traces like differnt house styles ,bog-sacrifices and fortifications . There doesnt seem to have been a 3rd part around 350. It would have left traces in ex house building styles. So if the DNA findings are correct there are other possibilities to consider. Maybe Hirelings/mercenaries from the outside . At least 1000 foreign troops (probably "norwegian-german-polish" by todays nations) were ex killed by the jutes and their weapons thrown in a lake close to Illerup Å-dal , so foreign troops have been a factor. Another possibility is that the foreign DNA has entered through people fleeing from the Huns Translate page: danmarkshistorien.dk/vis/materiale/vaabenofringen-i-illerup-aadal-ca-aar-205-evt da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offermose English summary historum.com/t/ritualistic-weapons-sacrifice.140067/ Knowledge of Anglian-Jute conflict : danish historical magazine Skalk
The AFRIKANER people who founded modern South Africa in 1652 came from the Dutch Seafaring Entrepreneurs along with French Hugenots and German sailors and craftsmen. Together with local indigenous tribes like the Hottentot developed a unique modern language called AFRIKAANS from Afrika .. is so they say in its structure, closest to the mother tongue of Ancient Germanic of any of the other Germanic languages... Is this true ?
I mean the original germanic ethnicity is only autochthonous in Northern Germany.. other than that, the population of Germany is predominately mixed with Eastern- (Slavs) and Western (Gallo-Italic) Europeans. People coming from the Middle East, Africa and East Asia just add to the admixture.
@@kimashitawa8113 Yeah, they're genetically not european. Even though the Gallo-Italic admixture has a high amount of Mediterrane influences, from the Roman period as well as Italian traders.
Good job Germany. Slave of the USA Oligarchs with names like Steiner, Goldstein, Silverstein, Morganstein, Dollarstein. Similar things happened in the USSR too.
the important study by McColl et al 2024 has convincingly showed that the germanic ethnic group originated in the area around todays Stockholm, Sweden.
I am Anglo Saxon: Angles come from NW Germany and Saxons come from southern Germany : The unfortunate and dreadful reality of the land now known as the United Kingdom, is filled with a people who in the last hundred years became the largest participant and contributor of the ethnic destruction of Europe.
My brother! Soxon comes from Saxxony, the most northern part of Germany bordering Denmark + the Anglo-Saxon immigration/invasion had a large numbers of Jutes/Juts modernday Jutaland (I think, translating in my head from Swedish, anyway modern day Denmark) & you had a large number of Danish vikings coming to modern day UK, creating the Danelaw & centering around York(Jorvik). Also it was the cutting down of holy tree's in Saxxony that started the Viking age having people go viking beyond the Baltic sea... Love, from Scandinavia! Had to watch things like this from time to time & see if they line up with the sagas told to me as young...
PS. What is Europe, but an ethnic destruction? Doesn't matter if it comes from south, north or east. Rarely from west, well maybe some vikings or earlier sea people...
_"The unfortunate and dreadful reality of the land now known as the United Kingdom, is filled with a people who in the last hundred years became the largest participant and contributor of the ethnic destruction of Europe"_ --- Extraction from a conversation between the British top politician and chief diplomat *Arthur Balfour* (1902 - 1905 British Prime Minister, 1915 - 1916 First Lord of the Admiralty, 1916 - 1919 British Foreign Minister) and US diplomat Henry White from the year 1907. *BALFOUR* : _„We are probably fools not to _*_find a reason for declaring war on Germany_*_ before she builds too many ships and takes away our trade.”_ *WHITE* : _“You are a very high-minded man in private life. How can you possibly contemplate anything so politically immoral as provoking a war against a harmless nation which has as good a right to a navy as you have? If you wish to compete with German trade, work harder.”_ *BALFOUR* : _“That would mean lowering our standard of living. Perhaps it would be _*_simpler for us to have a war._*_ ”_ *WHITE* : _“I’m shocked that you of all men should enunciate such principles.”_ *BALFOUR* : _“Is it a question of right or wrong? Maybe it is just a question of _*_keeping our supremacy_*_ .”_ (Source: Allan Nevins, „Henry White - Thirty Years of American Diplomacy", New York: Harper Bros., 1930, pp. 257-258) --- England bears an immense responsibility in the destruction of Europe not Germany ...
@@erikeriksson1660 The runes actually originated from contact with latin further south. Potentially through the west germanic people first (who of course used runes too before they were christianized around the 8th century).
@@theChaosKe The Runes were modifications of the Latin or Greek alfabet. But much older runes are found in North Germanic languages than in West Germanic language. We have writings in Proto-Norse, written in Runes but no writings from West Germanaic languages from that time.
There was a lot of fighting going on in jutland in this period (around 350) This can be seen by the weapon sacrifices found in the moors in the pensinsula of Jutland and other places in scandinavia too Close to Aarhus (Moesgaard museum) at least the equipment of 1000 well armed foreign warriors ended in the moor ,so the locals could defend themself Since i never heard of archeological findings pointing to a northward push ,the change in dna can be from hirelings/mercenaries/refugees/ people fleeing from the huns There had been a long turf-war in the peninsula of Jutland between the Jutes and the Anglians ,which the Anglians finally lost about 450. It should be possible to trace how the Anglians first moved northwards from what is the most northern part of Germany from around year 0 and back again around 450 through changes in house building styles. I have never heard about a change in the middle of this,so a military push from the south ,i doubt it
Germanic is the Roman exonym. Teutonic aka D(e)utsch is the endonym that derives from Proto-Germanic þiudiskaz, meaning "of the people". Us Germanic people should simply refer to ourselves as Teutonic. Because that's our own name for ourselves.
Deutsch/Dutch/-tjod ("þiudiskaz") means belonging to a tribe. But us germanics don't have a united tribe, yet live separated into smaller kingships (countries)... it's not part of our ethnic culture to be all-united.
not necessarily the case. it was well after germanic split into its descendents that this term came to be used this way and even then it was only used by west germanic languages in that way. there isn't a very good native proto germanic term to refer to the Germanic people as a whole.
The Cimbri and Teutons were 2 tribes living in the area of Jütland (North-Denmark). 120 B.C they left their home and moved down to the south. Maybe there was a short period in climate. The Romans tried to stop them from invading north-italy but were defeated in 2 or battles. "Furor teutonicus" was a synonim for becoming a berserc. After the tribes split up they were extinguished by the romans. You can read about the Cimbrics Wars in Roman history
The root of the Germanic people and language came from the R1B Kurgan people that settled scandinavia. The dominant haplogroup in Denmark, Norway and Iceland is R1B. All of Europe is at least 50% R1B.
origins of the Europeans. part 2 In 1635, during the reign of Louis XIII, Cardinal Jacques Armen Richelieu founded the French Academy. The Academy set itself the goal of creating a single French language from the languages of the peoples living in France and shaping the French people. A. Richelieu personally supervised this process. In 1978, Soviet philologist and French language expert S.D. Artamonov wrote about this in his work "History of foreign literature of the 17th-18th centuries": "The Academy contributed to the unification of terms, the speech expression of the language. Everything was moving towards the gradual change of the speech of the people... The Academy he had to compile a single dictionary of the French language, and then vigilantly control its purity and correctness. As a result of the reforms, the French language faded, lost its bright, original colors, but, in turn, became stronger. The strictest clarity, precision and logic were required." In 1694, the first French dictionary, containing 18,000 words, was compiled at the Academy. The latest edition of this dictionary, the 8th, was completed in 1935 and contained 35,000 words. Linguist Nikolai Ginov (Tatar) writes in his article "How Jacques Armen Richelieu Created French Literature": "When the reader reads the above... for some reason it seems to him that the French did not have a language before and they could not speak, communicate, write: they were dumb. and so on... and only Richelieu solved this problem... But I want to reassure my impatient reader. They had language, writing, literature; prose, poetry and everything else. But! But in Turkish. Here are French words of ancient Turkic origin very nicely disguised: pic - peak; egare-lost; jumeler - connect, connect; oubli - to forget; outre - except, besides, outside; sage- wise, obedient; savon - soap; sarein - clear, light; love- juice, strength; signal - signal; silence slalom - slalom; songe - dream, dream; songerie - thoughtfulness, dreaminess; soucoupe - saucer; souler - drink, solder ... But it was not possible to get rid of 'barbarisms': at first there were two languages, one spoken and the other written." Lamenting the poverty and limitations of the lexicon legitimized by the Academy, the writer and teacher François Fénelon wrote: "In trying to purify the language, it was restricted and cut off... We must regret the loss of the old language that we find in Maro, Amio, and Cardinal D'Oss: its kind of peculiar brevity, he had simplicity, courage and expressiveness". Geniuses of 17th century France, Jean Racine, Jean Lafortain and Jean Baptiste Poclen (Moliere), who studied at the "Clermont College" of the Jesuits, played a major role in the formation of the French language and culture. This was France of the XVII-XVIII centuries, which was considered the center of Catholicism. What was the situation in Russia during this period? A project called "Russicum" was created in Rome in 1581 under the leadership of A. Possevi for "Rusins". Based on this project, "Greek-Slavic-Latin" colleges were established in the Polish city of Vilno (now Vitebsk, Belarus), which had become the "fortress" of the Jesuits, under the leadership of the Pope's legate A. Possevi. About this Nikolai Ginov "Who invented the Russian language?" writes in his article: "The first was the work "Slavic-Russian grammar" written by Lavrenty Zizania in Vilno in 1596. However, this work did not find a proper place in Moscow schools because the Latin terminology did not suit Moscow teachers. Meletiy Smotritsky, the son of a city official from Kamenets, wrote a work called "Grammar of correct syntax of the Slovene language" in Vilno in 1618. "Grammar" was specially prepared for Muscovite Russia, Muscovites, to replace the existing language of Smotritsky - Proto-Bulgarian. This textbook was republished first in 1648 and then in 1721 as the only relevant textbook in Moscow. Almost all figures of Russian culture, including V.K.Trediakovsky and M.V.Lomonosov, learned the Slavic language from this book. What was special about this correct phrase? Let's analyze it in more detail, because here the Orthodox pedagogue used a mysterious word - "syntagma". Of course, this term is considered a Western European term, but it is derived from two Turkish words; "you" is a component and "tag" (tagma) means to bind. A completely understandable explanation for a Muscovite who lived in the late Middle Ages. Because he was educated in Tatar (Turkish) in his ancestral home." As the researchers noted, this work was written "in an incomprehensible Polish-Russian language". At that time, the population of Moscow poorly understood this language - the Slavic language, or rather, they did not understand it at all, because the population of Moscow at that time consisted of Tatars. In 1696, the German philologist Heinrich Wilhelm Ludolf, who lived in England, wrote the grammar of the Russian language - "Grammatica Russica" in Latin. Thus, the Jesuits changed the speech of Muscovites. In the next 18th century, all the letters that existed before in Kiev were transferred to the new language. In the 18th century, the Russian language had many dialects. There was a lot of difference between the dialects. Moscow, which declared itself the III Rome, divided the languages of Moscow into two parts: "Great Russian language" - "velikorusskoye narechiye" and "Little Russian language" - "molorusskoe narechiye". The term Molorossiya was used to refer to the population of the newly conquered lands of Catherine II - present-day Ukraine. Ukrainians were forbidden to speak their own language. In 1778, F.G. Karin wrote in his "Letter about translators of the Russian language": "The terrible difference between our language and the Slavic language often prevents us from expressing ourselves in the Slavic language except for everyday conversation... After our language was adapted to the Slavic language, the situation became quite shameful." In the same century, Johann Christian Dahl, a Danish linguist of German origin, came to Russia at the invitation of Catherine II, where he was busy organizing library work. He changed his name to Ivan Matveevich Dal. His son, Vladimir Ivanovich Dal, born in 1801, became not only a Russian citizen, but also a great Russian poet. In addition to Latin, German, French, he also knew Turkish, Tatar and Kazakh languages. He had invaluable services in the formation of the Russian language, in 1840 he wrote the "Explanatory Dictionary of the Great Russian Language". At first the dictionary was banned, but it was republished in 1863 and 1880.In this dictionary, V. Dal gave the beginning of Russian words from European languages, that is, he "proved" that Russian words originated from European words. In the last copy, the word "great Russian language" was replaced by the word "Russian language". Linguist Gil Nail Favilovich (Bashkir) writes about this dictionary: "I was not surprised when I opened the book 'Ancient Turkic Dictionary' near the Luhansk Cossack... Russian words of ancient Turkic origin. Having studied this rare scientific work up and down, I came to a shocking conclusion - it turns out that there was no Russian language in ancient times. This is a phantom. The calculation here is quite simple: if we remove the words Western European, Turkish and Finnish from this book, the book will remain empty pages." After 1880, this dictionary was repeatedly edited. One of the editors of the dictionary was the Frenchman Ivan Alexandrovich Baudouin de Courtenay, a descendant of King Louis VI. At the beginning of the 20th century, he completed V. I. Dal's dictionary, became a master of history and philology and a doctor of history in Russia. When you get acquainted with this information, it becomes clear that there was no Russian language in the 17th century, and the peoples living here spoke Finno-Ugric and Proto-Bulgarian languages. If there was no Russian language, then there was no Russian people. In the 18th-19th centuries, the Slovene language of the Rusyns living in the territory of Rech-Pospolita was "enriched" with European, Finno-Ugric and Proto-Bulgarian languages, and the Russian language was created, and as the local Finno-Urogs and Tatars/Turks spoke this language, they gradually became Russified. The Proto-Bulgarian language was later called the Church-Slavic language. Russian literary critic and publicist V. G. Belinsky wrote about the difficulty of the Russian language in 1875: "But such progress is possible not only for the young Russian language, which is still in its infancy in every respect, but also for the French language, which is two centuries old... Writing letters in Russian , it's just a pain, the wording is harsh, the grammar and seminary smell, the translations are awkward. If you can't find a Russian equivalent, write the French one, and a good translation will be obtained in the meantime."
Very interesting, thank you for the references. It's something we forget about going back in history; trying to draw borders for empires rather than understanding that there were so many tribes and villages with their own languages and dialects, which will rarely be remembered since the crown only adopts one in order to assimilate as many peasants and armies as possible. My cousin married a gut from the Carpathians and the way he and his groomsmen spoke was so familiar yet so strange it broke my brain a bit haha. I grew up speaking both UA and RU and have a collection of tales told in their many forms and dialects from all over Eastern Europe: there are hundreds. And stull it feels like the tip of the iceberg. It would be lovely to get familiar with French one day and read some of the older, less formal works in various dialects. And props to the Basque peoples for hanging on to their identities for so long.
@@zarinaromanets7290 You are welcome. ı have mentioned it before maybe you have seen it or not. the making of slavs (from Turks is a free book and book from Mrat adji. and here from turkish book ı had translated part1 The Transformation of Turks into Russians. Extended Version The Russians are the successors of the Turkish tribes in the region, especially the Tin (Don) Bulgars. The Bulgars of Tin, Bulgarland under Kutrak, the middle son of the Bulgar Khagan Kubrat. Russian history begins as part of Bulgarian and Khazar history. The Otuz Oghuzes, who were first mentioned as Utigur in 545 in Eastern Roman sources, were Turkish tribes who founded the Khazar Khaganate. The Thirty Oghuzs came under the subordination of the Sak Kagan in the Black Sea Steppe, and then the Kun Khanate in Europe, which took over these places. After the disintegration of the Kun Khaganate, the lands of the Otuz Oghuz clan, which lived as independent communities in the Black Sea Steppe, passed into the hands of the Avars who escaped from the Turkish Khaganate in 557. The Thirty Oghuzs scanned the subordination of the Turkish Khaganate, which captured the North Caucasus and the Black Sea Steppe in 568. After the Turkish Khaganate was divided into two as Eastern and Western Khaganates in 603, the Thirty Oghuzes remained under the subordination of the Western Turkic Khaganate. Böri Şat, who was a shadi of the Khazar tribe, one of the Otuz Oghuz tribes, and a sengun (general) in the army of the Western Turkish Khaganate, was also the commander of the army of the Caspian region during the Third Turkish-Sasanian War in the Caucasus between 627-630. After the disintegration of the Western Turkic Khaganate after 630, the Otuz Oghuz tribes established the Khazar Khanate in the north of the Caucasus under the leadership of the Caspian tribe. The Caspian tribe lived on the lands on the west bank of the river in the lower İdil tribes. The founder of the Khanate was Böri Şad, who was appointed as the ruler of the North Caucasus region by the Western Turkish Khanate. Later, the khanate lands spread to the Crimea and Black Sea Steppes and around the Caspian Sea. The Khazar Khaganate, which was previously an ortunal (central) khanate, turned into a federation of several autonomous regions between the end of the 9th century and the beginning of the 10th century. In the western lands of the Khanate, the region of the Kievan Rus Turks was located. This region, which was directly affiliated to the khanate, gained autonomy in 882, and after the uprising in 965, it became an independent khanate and expanded gradually. In the south of the Kievan Rus lived Hungarians, a union of the San Oğurs and Urogs, a Turkish tribe. These, too, came to an autonomous position at the same time as the Kievan Ruslan. However, later, as a result of the attacks of the Pechenegs, they left their lands and migrated to Panonia and established their own khanate there. The Oghuz Yabguluk, consisting of 21 tribes in the eastern lands of the Khanate, and the Alan Principality in the north of the Caucasus gained an autonomous position at the beginning of the 10th century and gained their independence after the uprising in 965. The Idil Bulgarians living in the northern lands of the Khazar Khaganate were ruled by the Bulgarian ilteber (governor) affiliated to the khanate. Like the Russians and Oghuzs, the Volga Bulgars established a separate khanate after the uprising. Kınıks, one of the Otuz Oghuz tribes, lived just opposite the area where the Caspian tribe lived, in the north of the Caspian Sea and in the region between the İdil and Yayık rivers. Pechenegs lived in the north of Kınık, on the east and west banks of the Yayık (Ural) River. The Pechenegs were a tribe of Thirty Oghuz who lived on their own, although they were under the rule of the khanate. Later, some of the Pechenegs migrated west to the lands inhabited by the Hungarians. West of the Pechenegs was the territory of another Thirty Oghuz tribe, the Kipchaks. Sarirs lived in the south of Alans, which was also a tribe of Thirty Oghuz. The Sarirs were the Sasanian Parthians in the South Caucasus. The name Russian has been transformed from the word uras/urus/urus/uruzso in Old Turkish dictionaries which means strike (coup), strike and war. In old Uyghur documents, Uruz is also referred to as a male name
@@zarinaromanets7290 part 2 According to the Torluk (official) tariq (date), a troop of Vikings from Sweden came to the Black Sea Steppe in the 9th century, subdued the culturally inferior Slavs and established the first Russian principality in Kiev. Later, these cultured Vikings gradually fused with the Slavs. Today's Russians, Ukrainians and White Russians hardly agree with this. In reality, no one but the Turks came from Sweden to the Black Sea Steppe. Because in the 1st millennium BC Southern Scandinavia was located 124 Origin of the Germans and Slavs The Turks, who had settled down, established the first principalities in Scandinavia in the 5th century AD. After gaining independence from the Khazar Khanate, the rulers of the Kievan Rus Principality carried the Khanate. For example, Hudud El Alem¹, written in the late 10th century, calls Russian rulers khagans. Russian rulers' use of kagan sanctuary continued until after 1169, when the Vladimir-Suzdal rulers replaced the kagan sanctuary with the condemning (punitive) sanctuary. The word condemning later became Knyaz (KH) with the adoption of the Slavic language. According to the Russian chronicles written in the 16th century, in the 9th century, some Vikings from today's Swedish lands crossed the Baltic to the east and established a state in Novogrod. Swedish Vikings are the successors of the Suyan and Kading Turkish tribes settled in Scandinavia. The Turks on the eastern side of the Baltic Sea called these Turks Varang (varan, reaching). According to the chronicles, the regions of the Eastern Slavs were divided between the Varangians and the Khazars in the 9th century. The Varangians first began collecting taxes from the Slavic and Finnish tribes in 859. In 862, Finnish and Slavic tribes in the Novgorod region revolted against the Varangians, expelled them across the sea, and, refusing to pay more taxes, began to rule themselves. However, as the tribes had no laws of their own, they soon began to fight each other and then summoned the Varang to rule them and bring peace to the region. The accuracy of these chronicles, written in the 16th century, is naturally debatable. Minorsky, V. F., Hudud al Alam, Luzac Co., 1937, London p. 161-162. Brary of Congress Catalog, No: 53-10264 The Russian Primary Chronicle, The Mediaeval Academy of America, Li Julius Brutzkus, "The Caspian origin of ancient Kyiv", Slavonic and East European Review 22, 1944, p. 120. The Origin of the Germans and Slavs 125 According to the chronicles, the three brothers Rurik, Sineus and Truvor settled in Novgorod, Beloozero and Izborsk, respectively. [from the name Rurik, Anik (clean); Sineus, from the name of Şineş (pusan, ambush, warrior); Truvor has evolved from the name Turbar (batur and valiant). After the two brothers died, Rurik became the sole ruler of the realm and the ancestor of the Rurik bloodline. A short time later, two of Rurik's men, Askold and Dir, asked in vain (permission) to go to Tsangrad [Constantinople]. [Askold, As Kalit / Askalt (bouncing high, exalting) from my step; Dir has been transformed from the name Tur (yigit, batur.)]. Heading south, they stormed the small town of Kiev [Coastal House] on the hill, snatching it and the surrounding country from the Caspian, and filling the region with more Varangians, they also established a foothold over the land of the Polyans. A chronicle writes that Askold and Dir went to Constantinople with a fleet to attack in 863-66, and they attacked the city by sacking the surrounding area with one attack. Another chronicle dates the attack to 860. Patriarch Photius describes in detail the destruction of the surrounding and nearby islands. The Russians return without attacking the city, either because of a storm that scatters their ships or because of the Emperor's return. In a later statement, he writes that the Russians could not be harmed because of a god (miracle) after the Patriarch and Emperor's ceremony for the Blessed Virgin. The attack is the first encounter between the Russians and Eastern Rome. The patriarch arcular (decides) to send overlords (priests) to the north to convert the Russians and other tribes to Christianity. In the chronicles, "(880-882) Then [Oleg] came to the heights of Kyiv and saw how Askold and Dir were ruling there. He hid his warriors in boats, left some behind and advanced, carrying [Rurik's son Igor. Askold and Diri killed and they buried them on the hill now known as the Hungarian, where the fortress of Olma [Alma / Elma] is located (...) Oleg opposes himself in Kiev. He wrote." When Rurik was on his deathbed in 879, Oleg, who was close, asked him to rule his principality as the atabe (regent) of his younger son Igor [Oleg's name is Alık, which means light red in Old Turkish, and Elig / nüş, which means ruler. However, Elig / llig The name Igor has been transformed from Agar, which means honor in Old Turkish.] In 880-82, Oleg attacked south along the Ozi (Dnieper) River and first captured Smojersk and Lubeç. Then he captured Kiev, dethroned Askold and Dir and killed him. By declaring himself a khan, he made Kiev the center (center) of the Russian Principality. - his life) In the chronicles, the 10th century He writes that the tribes living in the north of the Black Sea every year established many cities here and that these tribes were Sak (Scythian) tribes. "They were numerous, they lived on the shores of Ozi (Dniester). They lived in cities that were theirs to this day. The Greeks [Eastern Romans] called them the Great Scythians. (...) The Varangians, the Slavs and all who accompanied him [Oleg] the others were called Rus. (...) Leaving Igor in Kiev, Oleg attacked the Greeks [Eastern Romans], so a large number of Varang, Slav, Chud, Krivic who were pagan , Merili, Polyanli, Sever, Derevli, Radimicli, Croat, Dulebli and Tiverk. All these tribes are known to the Greeks [Eastern Romans] as Great Scythians." Even in these chronicles, which were written 800 years after the events, it is stated that these tribes, which are said to be Scandinavian, Slavic and Uralic societies today, are Saklar (Turks). The Origin of All these Germanic and Slavs 127 They belonged to the Khazar Khaganate, and the sum of the tribes that taxed them was called Rus. According to the chronicles, these tribes received one sword per rak Ocak (household). In the chronicles, Oleg, son (relative) of the Novogrod lord Rurik, who came from Scandinavia in 882 and was a Varang, captured (declared) himself lord by capturing a Khazar city of Kiev, and gave it to the Varans and Slavs and Oleg. It is written that all other tribes accompanying e are called Rus (Urus). The name of the Polyan tribe, one of the tribes known as the Great Scythian, has been transformed from the old Turkish word bulgan, which means angry, angry. This is where the name of today's Poles comes from. The name of the Derevli tribe has been transformed from the word ireklig, which means the old Turkish tree. The Russian word derevliane meaning forest is derived from the word drevo (nepeno) meaning tree. This word has been transformed into Russian from the old Turkish word tirek, which means pole, poplar, tree, forest. In Old Turkish, tireklik means place where trees grow, and tireklik (direkli) means one who has a tree. The name Krivic is derived from the old Turkish word kerig, which means wide. The name of the Sever tribe has been transformed from the name Sabir / Subar / Suvar. A part of the Suvars remained among the Tin Bulgars. The name of the Duleb / Dulib tribe has been transformed from the old Turkish word tulib, which means full, complete, perfect. The name of the Tiverk tribe has been transformed from the word teler /teper, which means the one who oppresses, oppresses and hits. The name of the Radimic tribe has been transformed from the word oath, which means clean, flawless, holy. Probably the name of this tribe was Antmış. On the other hand, the Chuds and Merilis are Urog tribes who are not Turks but are descended from Turks. According to the Kronks, Oleg began to build fenced cities and taxed the Slavs. He ordered the city of Novgorod to pay annual taxes to the Varangians. He himself was a taxpaying national of the Khazar Khaganate. Although this chapter in the chronicles has an epic air, Oleg 128 The Origin of the Germans and Slavs in Kyiv and its environs in 882. It is understood that it became an autonomous principality under the Khazar Khaganate under his administration. The people living here were Bulgarians of Tin. Thus, the Khazar Khaganate controlled a very large region up to Novogrod by the hands of Kyiv. After gaining independence from the Khazar Khaganate in 965, Vladimir, who proclaimed (declared) his khanate, converted to Christianity in 988. [The name Vladimir changed from Balat Imir (Steel Dawn) to Balat Mar (Mar means lord / manager). The second option seems more realistic]. However, the Christianization process of the Tengrist Russians took quite a long time, because the society was showing great resistance to this new religion. When the chroniclers decided (decided) to endorse a new faith instead of the "traditional idol worship" of the Slavs [such was Tengrism to the Christians], he sent his most valuable advisers and warriors as emissaries to different regions and learned about Islam, Judaism, and Christianity. specifies. Vladimir disapproves of Islam because Islam forbids alcohol, among many other things. However, the Russians, like all the Old Turks, were a society that loved to drink. Nor does he approve of Judaism, for the God of the Jews had in vain (permitted) his chosen ones to be expelled from their own country. Thus, Vladimir chooses Christianity. In reality, Vladimir converted to Christianity in order to get the support of Eastern Rome against the Khazar Khanate and the emperor II.late lands in the north.
@@zarinaromanets7290 part 3 Thus, Vladimir chooses Christianity. In reality, Vladimir converted to Christianity in order to get the support of Eastern Rome against the Khazar Khanate and the emperor II. He established ties with Eastern Rome by marrying Basil's sister Anna. Hudud al-Alam describes the Russian region as follows: "There are Pechenegs mountains in the east of this country. There is the Ruta River in the south, the Saklabs [Saklar / "Slavs"] in the west, and desolate lands in the north. It is a vast country and its inhabitants are bad-tempered, stubborn, arrogant-looking, belligerent and warlike, they fight and defeat all the other heathens living around them. Page 129 The name of the brain is Rus-Kağan. By its nature, it is a country that is highly preferred in terms of all life necessities. Some of them do bravery. Respectful treatment of the doctors [kams], Every year they pay the sultan [Caspian khaganma] ten percent (ten percent) of their loot and bad (trade) earnings. Among them live a group of Saklabs who serve them, about 100 cubits [about 70 meters. However, it has to be 10 cubits (7 meters).] They wear shalwarlandic trousers made of cotton fabric and tuck them on their knees. They wear wool caps with their tails falling behind their necks. They put their dead with all their belongings, together with food and drink in the kurgan (grave). They are buried together with 38 pieces of hush objects.Olülere yaba (Kyiv) is the Russian city closest to the Islamic lands. It is a pleasant place and the khan resides here. They produce various furs and valuable swords. Slaba to the Bulgarian region for the slave (trade) of his people when peace prevails. Urtab [it has to be Rostov] is a city where foreigners are killed at every sight (at the sight of). And they produce swords and swords.” Again, Hudud al-Alam defines the Tin Bulgars, which he calls Inner Bulgars, as follows: “There is Mirvat in the east, the Gurz Sea [Black Sea] in the south, Saklablar in the west, and the Russian mountain in the north. It is a country without cities. Its inhabitants are brave, warlike, and fearsome. Their nature is similar to that of the Turks living near the Caspian land. The Inner Bulgarians are at war with all the Russians, but they continue to trade with everyone around them. They have sheep, stuffing (weapons) and means of war."9 According to the 10th century traveler, the Jew Ibrahim Ibn Yaqub, the Khazarians spoke the language of Saklabla (Slavs). This language was Turkish naturally. "Minorsky, V. F., Hudud al Alam , Luzac Co., 1937, London p. 159. Ibid., p. 160 Dunlop, D. M., Khazar Jewish History, Selenge Publications, Istanbul, 2019 35 130 The Origin of the Germans and Slavs According to Istahri, who lived in the 10th century, the Russians used to sit on three chairs. This city was larger than the Bulgarian cities of Idil. it was One cluster was close to the Idil Bulgars. Their lords are in Kiev These are the Bulgarians of Spirit. The second cluster lived further away from the first. These have to be Novogrod Russians. The chief of the third group lived in the city of Ersa. Ersa should be the city of Rostov. People used to go to Kiev for ködu (trade). However, there was no mention of any foreigner going to Ersa. Ersa society used to kill people who set foot on it. Sable fur and lead were brought from Ersa. The fox skins of Burtas (Kipchak-Janm region) were also brought from here. The Russians were a people who cremated their dead. The künges (concubines) of the rich were cremated together with their masters of their own accord. Some of the men would cut their beards, and some of them would braid it like a zuluf. They used to go to the Eastern Rome, the Caspian, Bulgar, to the köduye (trade). They were neighbors to Eastern Rome from the north. They were so powerful that they collected taxes from Eastern Rome.¹¹ Russian knights (traders) used to pay a tax at the rate of one-tenth of the goods to the Khazar khan for the furs and swords they brought. The Khazar Khaganate levied house (household) or plow tax from national tribes. This tax was taken in the form of a sword or money. After the middle of the 10th century, the Khazar Khaganate was no longer able to collect taxes from the İdil Bulgars, which was dependent on it, and its relations with Eastern Rome deteriorated. Because Eastern Rome was in unity with the Pechenegs against the Khazar Khaganate. After the disintegration of the Khazar Khaganate, the Pechenegs were oppressing the Caspian lands from their homeland between the Idil and Tin rivers. Russian relations with the Pechenegs were complex. Because they were forming alliances with each other or against each other. However, in the First Chronicle, Russian 4.247 of the Pechenegs in 915, "Dunlop, D. M., History of the Khazar Jewish, Selenge Publications, Istanbul, 2019, While stating that he entered his territory and then made a peace, he writes that he started the war with the Russians again in 920. The Khazar Khaganate had begun to lose its control over the Turkish tribes in the country at the beginning of the 10th century. The independent behavior of the Turkish tribes Russians, Bulgarians, Oghuzs, Pechenegs and Kipchaks led to the weakening of the khanate. The first uprising came from the Russians. It was suppressed. Later, a large part of the Pechenegs migrated to the Russian region because they could not get along with the other Oghuz tribes in the east, and meanwhile they attacked the Khazar khanate armies, causing confusion in the country. The Hungarians, the union of the Yellow Oğurs and the Urogs, lived in the south of the Russians, previously under the Khazar Khaganate. Later, due to the Pecheneg attacks, they migrated to the west and settled in Panonia (Today's Hungarian Plain). The Kabars, one of the powerful tribes on which the Khazar Khanate was based, rose up in the early 9th century and lost the power struggle, then left the khanate and joined the Hungarian Union and later migrated to Panonia with them. In the first half of the 10th century, the Russians, İdil Bulgars and the Oghuz tribes in the east were now out of control. One of the biggest factors that led to the purification (weakening) of the Khazar Khaganate was the separation of the Kiniks, a very powerful tribe, from the khanate in the beginning of the 10th century, under the leadership of Sübaşı Selçuk Bey, within the Otuz Oghuz union that founded the Khazar Khaganate. Seljuk Bey, in disagreement with the Khazar khan, migrated to the eastern Oghuz Yabgulu lands, which were in conflict with him, although he was affiliated with the Kınık tribe, of which he was the chief. In 912 Oleg sent his subjects to Constantinople to make a peace treaty with Eastern Rome. After Oleg's death in 913, his relative Igor took his place. Os 132 The Origin of the Germans and Slavs While stating that he entered his territory and then made a peace, he writes that he started the war with the Russians again in 920. The Khazar Khaganate had begun to lose its control over the Turkish tribes in the country at the beginning of the 10th century. The independent behavior of the Turkish tribes Russians, Bulgarians, Oghuzs, Pechenegs and Kipchaks led to the weakening of the khanate. The first uprising came from the Russians.
@@zarinaromanets7290 sorry ı could not upload the rest but ı have a group on face book slavs an their turkic origin. a lot about the Carpatians croarts serbian, hungars, dacians and bulgars turkishnes when proximitly the transformation and resets happened.
Very interesting documentary but we must treat his assertion that the Tollense battlefield represents a pitched battle between proto Germanic and Proto Celtic forces with extreme caution. He may well be right but archaeologists so far have not been able to attribute language or culture to any of the bones or weapons found at the site
So it seems that probably half of the Germanic peoples carry Germanicized Celtic (especially Austria and England), Slavic (South-West Germany and surrounding areas) and EEF (for almost all especially I/E/J carriers) Y-DNA.
@@RackerPaSThe study used to make this video makes the bizarre claim that SW Germany (a region never inhabited by Slavs) is more Slavic than North/Central Germany (a region historically partially inhabited by Slavs). We should take such claims with a grain of salt until we get more information.
@@EnglishShieldwallEast Germans have less Slavic dna than west Slavs I find pretty funny that Slavs overhype east germany even though they’re land wasn’t even Slavic until the migration period.
German actually refers to more than just the people of Germany. It also refers to Austria and Luxembourg and Switzerland. This is because these countries also speak a dialect of Modern German and were part of the Holy Roman Empire until the end and descended from the tribes that created modern Germany rather than the tribes that created the other Germanic countries.
@@romain6275 it refers to a large ethnic group too of all people descended from German tribes and speak German. Austrians, Luxembourgers, Lichtensteiners, and Swiss Germans are all German.
May i ask,who give name of Scotiland and scots,is verry weird,in bulgarian,scotovudstvo(скотовъдство) mean animal husbandry and they used bagpipe,as bulgarian,hihihi in other side of Europe.The world is small.Healt and happynes
A striking similarity between pictographic writing _ Germania & Mohen jo daro which is U. Does it denote the Almighty or something spiritual ? Another similarity is suffix ani in Persia Sindhi on the one hand & Germania Romania Armenia on the other Deciphering is easier if we compare pictographic writing
In regards to your thumbnail. I know some one who keeps his hair in this Saxon style . Eric is from Dusseldorf . And he is probably reading this comment now .
Scandinavia and today's territories of Denmark and northern Germany are the territories of origin of the Germanic ethnic group and haplogroup I1 is base for their identity. Later, they broke into the continental part of Europe and assimilated part of the Celtic and North Slavic population.
Southern Sweden is the birthplace of the Germanic peoples no doubt.
North Slavic Population?
@@RackerPaS He means the Wends, the West Slavic peoples that used to occupy what is now Pomerania, Saxony, & Brandenburg.
@@RackerPaS I am specifically referring to the Slavs who lived in the territory around the Elbe River and Lužice area as well as those around the Alps. However, the term itself refers to the Slavs - from the Czech Republic to Russia (without the Balkans - where the southern branch lives).
@@AMEurope333 That are West Slavic. And she come in the Territory of Germans.
Germanic and Celtic history is always interesting!
Ile jest genetycznie Niemców w Niemcech :)? 😊
Yeah, they’re actually my two favorites, because they are the best people, with the best morals. They’re also the best looking, and the most intelligent, which is why they’ve been the most successful, at the most important things. They are two of the most supreme, master groups, without a doubt. That’s why their lives actually matter, of course, and most other people’s don’t.
@@chriswebster24 go back under the bridge!
It really is. For a very long time i thought that Elves, Dwarves, Orks, Trolls and so on were all things imagined up by the makers of games like Dungeons and Dragons. I had no idea that it was from Germanic mythology. I don't mean to bash D&Ds but this mythology became more appealing and interesting to me after that
@@chriswebster24 Wonderful post. Love hearing my people actually having pride and recognition for their natural place in the world. If more people still thought this way, our quality of life would be much greater.
I’m the descendant of the Germanic peoples. Most of my ancestors are from Northern England and Denmark with a smattering of Scottish, Swedish, Norwegian and German thrown in for good measure. This video helped me understand more about my heritage. Thanks.🙏
So, you're a mut.
Very good that you make the distinction between German and Germanic.
imo, the peoplegroup should be named after the Elbe river rather than Germany.
@@fredriks5090 They are not named after Germany, Germany is just a modern English name for a new nation. The peoplegroup are named by the Romans before England and Germany existed.
The English mixup of Deutsche and Germanen has led to so much confusion and ignorance among people who don’t speak other languages. It gets even weirder when the “German” areas of Germany, Austria, and Switzerland are by far the least Germanic among the countries usually associated with that origin. If only they started calling Germans Dutch and gave the Dutch their proper name of Netherlanders.
@@fridrekr7510 The dutch are called dutch because they called themselves that and Germany is called Germany because that's what the word was intended for. The Romans didn't really know the nordic countries, the word German/Germani probably originates from Belgium. If you look at a population density map of Europe you can see that the Rhine is a major hot spot and this was similar in Roman times. If you could ask a Roman where the Germans live he would point to central Europe and Germany is the country that matches the best with the large area.
We have a different perspective on "Germanic" than the Romans even though the concepts is based on theirs because we focus on many later North Germanic sources and try to complete the picture. Northern Germany part of the Germanic Birthplace though and we have important runes that are much older than the Edda in southern Germany. German Switzerland is suprisingly Germanic too, more so than some parts of Germany.
"German" and "Deutsch" has essentially gone through the same developement, referering to a wider Germanic population in continental Europe first and then narrowing down towards Germany. The differentiation of dutch and deutsch stands mostly on the fact that "Deutsch" increasingly means high German only and that the dutch use a different name for their language now. Low German is very similar to dutch and still native to large parts of the Netherlands (Nedersaksisch). Similarly Nederfrankisch is also spoken in parts of Germany. Originaly there was one gradient of dialects from the different west-germanic tribes. When they wrote the dutch national anthem around 500 years ago they still emphazised the "duytsch" blood of Willem van Oranje who was from Hessen. Similarly Ludwing von Bayern included dutch icons in his Walhalla memorial Hall for the intention that "All Germans may feel that they have a shared fatherland whatever tribe they are from."
The Netherlanders ARE Dutch/Deutsch, as much as Germans and all other Germanic people are. @@fridrekr7510
Currently my favorite channel on RUclips. Keep up the great work
Will have to watch this several times and take notes...very information dense. Brilliant as always.
Very good! No AI voice ! 👍👍👍👍greetings from Norway 🇳🇴
Pennsylvania born germanic person here, sir name Shettler and spoke Pa.PA. deutch (amish) as my first language and just ate Sauer Kraut an pork for supper lol thanks for the video
My Great-Grandfather settled in Morrison Illinois and Iowa around the 1890s. My Grandpa was born in Morrison Illinois and some of his other brothers and sisters were born in Northern Germany
Greetings from the wide, wide Elbe River on the German North Sea coast
Jeśli z północno wshodnich Niemiec, to może mieć słowiańskie pochodzenie. Bo tam do tej pory nazwy miejscowości, pozostałości archeologiczne i duża część genetycznie jest posłowiańska.
The Germanics are my favorite breed. I love their phenotype and color pallet; Blonde, Red, Brunette, Blue eyes, green eyes, fair skin. Not to mention how their Males mastered Science and made the world what it is.
Yes. its definitely the most influental ethnic group and formed the world as it is today. The germanic people have an incomparable predisposition of creating art and science.
Germanic males are superior. 👌🏻
brunette is a common trend amongst Celts (Wales,Ireland to some extend South Belgium )not Germanic.
A failed Austrian painter would have loved you
@michaeltsagalakis When I speak of Germanics I refer to the entire northern european breed, basically all Europeans with the exception of Olive skinned, darker haired Europeans who I call the Arab/Germanic hybrids.
I’m Scots-Bavarian-Anglo/Saxon. My college roommate was a Dane. We can speak to each other in three languages. I’ve met them all in Berlin once. Berlin, Copenhagen, and Odense, and Oslo are amazing places full,of wonderful people.
@@leetlbt Southern California
@@leftwingmofosapologies for the faith of your lineage
Aka Celtic Germanic
@@natelewis4299 Yep.
@@leetlbt i tend to associate the word “nice” with rain and cold, while i would associate “warm” (at least the kind of warmth in california) more negatively. but i suppose that's my germanic genes
I ❤ germanic people!
Same, I love learning the history of my ancestors!
@@morpheuskristos racist vibes
@@shaftofwisdom Keyboard warrior vibes
@@shaftofwisdom😂 amoeba vibes
@@shaftofwisdom Any other race saying that and you wouldn't have called him racist.
As profound a video as ever. Thank you very much. Keep it on, please.
Rewatching all the videos on this channel again. Thank you for your hard work. Happy new year!!
The golden coloured helmet looks like the one from the Anglo-Saxon treasure discovered at Sutton Hoo in England, UK.
Same people, broadly speaking and same material culture
Thanks for another great upload
Nice video! I'm a Frisian (Ingaevones) and I feel connected to Scandinavia and to Denmark in particular. I can't explain it, but I already felt it when I was little. There's something there and it's calling me haha.
Just returned from a two days trip to DK. Nice, really nice country to live in. My such feelings are more oriented to former Prussia, though. The architecture just speaks to me.
Genetic memories do exist, so your feelings may be telling you the truth.
@@lowersaxon How nice! We're going to Denmark at the end of this month, where we will stay for a week. We want to go to Ribe (which is a special city for Frisians, since Frisians were involved in the founding of the city. Many Frisians lived and traded there), Odense and Copenhagen. I'm so looking forward to it!
Is het oude Friesland niet groter dan alleen de provincie? Van België, Nederland, Noord Duitsland en Denemarken? Friesland…de Freya’s kinderen, ofwel “vrijheid” als hoogste goed. Ik denk dat je het Oera Linda boek wel gaaf zal vinden! Als je het niet al kent 😊
Germanen = Gertmannen = mannen van Gert = Gert was de aanvoerder. Er is meteen een heel volk naar vernoemd 😂
As allways, Brilliant!! Thank you very much.
At the start of the expansion phases, there were therefore at least three major groups that were genetically distinct and homogeneous : on the one hand, the R1a-M417 carriers of Corded Ware, and on the other, two more closely related groups of R1b-Z2103 from the Yamna culture and R1b-L51, who are still poorly represented by ancient samples but are present in Bohemia to the south of the Corded Ware. The descendants of R1a-M417 are the Balto-Slavic and Indo-Iranian language branches, while R1b-Z2103 would have given rise to at least Armenian and Greek, as well as Tocharian languages and possibly Albanian. Finally, descendants of R1b-L51 would have formed at least the Germanic and Italo-Celtic branches, as well as the Lusitanian language.
Great, thank you very much. A R1b-L51 here.
Very nice video...
One remark though: at 17:25 you refer to a "Hünenburg" implying that is the name of the place. The site is called a Hünenburg (literally: a giant fortification or a giant's fortification) and is located in Watenstedt, in Lower Saxony.
BTW a few kilometres to the northeast in Schöningen the oldest man-made spears ever discovered were found with an estimated age of 300.000 years.....
Germans might be older than we thought.
One watch isn't enough to take it all in. Thank you.
A very deep and well researched study of the Germanic tribes. I enjoyed he scenery with the folk in costume and your voice. I feel quite connected to this hisory.
Good breakdown. Ty from a Cimbrii descendant.
I'm proud to be Germanic.
Why being proud?
@@iparipaitegianiparipaitegi4643cuz he loves his culture???
@iparipaitegianiparipaitegi4643 Because it's normal to be proud of things and people beyond that of one's own personal achievements. Anyone who disagrees is self-centred and it says a lot about them when they try to pathologise organic nationalism (ie, being very proud of your ancestors and your heritage). It should be us pathologising their maladaptive thinking, not the other way around therefore.
@@iparipaitegianiparipaitegi4643 I do love my culture.
@@WilliamCelandine Well said. It is normal to feel a connection to one's ancient past.
Okay 8 to 9 min in you are discussing a possible eastern movement of the Germanics into central-northern Europe. It made me think of Snorris account in Ynglingasaga of Odin first going to Russian then moving into Saxland then taking over Sweden afterward.
Perhaps then if this new paper is right Snorris account has a lot of truth to it, and they had mythological memories of this migration later euhemerized by Snorri.
Love these videos. Thanks for making them
12:14: that map is neither Corded Ware nor Funnel Beaker - it is the extent of the Pitted Ware culture from 4000 BC.
This is without a doubt the best video on RUclips about the Germanic origins & history!!
I’m a big fan of “Getica” by Jordanes. Here in Sweden & Gotland it is highly criticized. But these genetic studies give me a lot of hope. Thanx again for this fantastic video!!
Thanks. I will be doing more in the near future.
@@FortressofLughI like the fact that you give the legends of origin some credit. Here historians & politicians tend to do all they can to disprove the Nordic origins of the Germanic tribes. (I mean why would it be false? Why would someone lie about their place of origin just like that?).
Also countless RUclipsrs seem to have an obsession to mix up Germanic with Celtic cultures and vice versa. I thank you for not doing that 🫶
I have great interest in my Bavarian and Norwegian backgrounds.Great fighters.
Fantastic documentary!
What a great video 😊 thank you for bringing a little more knowledge into my life ❤
Danish people were descended from Swedish tribes,most northern Germanic people originated from Sweden,as were the Burgundian’s.
Skåne is Danish 🇩🇰
Found the Swede.
I disagree , Denmark is the center
@@croatianwarmaster7872 exactly
Anes was only on THE Islands not in JUTLAND WE WHERE NOT Danes
Interesting and enjoyable video. Thank you
Awesome presentation! My favorite subject that of my ancestors. Well done.
Thank you for a very informative video.
My Swedish mother and grandparents always said: “Scratch a German hard enough and you will find a Swede.”
Scratch or tickle?😅
Fantastic presentation. Thank you very much.
Dear Kevin yet another masterpiece of work thank you ✌️🇿🇦😊
As a man of German ancestry thank you for this video!
17:50 we know that there were "atleast 4 people, most of which in their teens, buried in the grave under different periods during the early bronze age".
It wasn't a king's grave. Furthermore, there is a neolithic layer beneath it, showing it was a grave site for earlier people aswell.
I’m happy to come from South Eastern Norway. I grew up in an aerea rich in petroglyphs, stoneships, stonecircles, runestones ( Tunesteinen/the Tune stone ) and ships ( Tune/Rolføy ship ). I’m Christian, but I feel a deep connection to my ancestral land.
How’s mass immigration treating Norway?
@@CB-dl1vg not too good, but there’s hope. Most Nordic countries are more sceptic too immigration now and the next Norwegian election will most likely get a very immigration sceptic party a lagre part of the votes. We are not as fucked as Sweden, Germany or especially the UK.
You're a Christian?
What does that mean?
What does that mean to you?
Who is Christ?
Who is Jesus?
Who are you?
Bible says you can not serve 2 masters-
Do you serve yourself- your own flesh in a world that will ultimately be destroyed?
Or-
Do you serve God?
I do not feel connected to my ancestry or my land-
As I am merely passing through.
If you feel (feel?) Connected to the land, then I would go out on a proverbial limb and say you are not a Christian.
You decieve yourself.
Unless you have repented for your sins, lusts, and adultery- you have not received the spirit of God- the holy spirit who comes into you and sups with you and thee with HE.
That is the rebirth- when God removes your stony earthly heart and replaces it with a heart of flesh.
@@rdallas81shut up about your jew God christcuck
Stop being a christcuck. A desert jew God is not yours.
In Germany Odin is called Wotan. The old englisch and old saxon language have the same base (Ænegl-Saxon = Ængeland = England). In the englisch and german weekdays you see some names of nordic gods until today. Wednesday = Wotansday or Thursday = Thorsday or Friday = Freyasday.
Hail our ancestors!
Iam dutch with 81 % northwest european dna and 19% scandinavian. I think i qualify 💪🏻
My genetic DNA traces to each of these ancient Germanic tribes, including the Steppe cultures and Scandinavian. I have DNA ties to the Goths (Visi and Ostro).
Thank you for this nicely put together video.
How did you find all this?! You a hun/german/slav 😂😂
@@tarakabuddha The data base for archeogenetics can run your DNA through and any matches will come up. Sometimes it is a ‘probability’ or shared, but it can also shared SNP matches which are literally like fingerprints, so definitive.
@@Timeless_Lea daaaamn that's cool!! What was your initial reaction after learning about the DNA ties?
@@tarakabuddha I feel blessed to know such details, and I love that I have such cool ancestry. I also was DNA matched to the Longobards and the Alemanni. So, I feel so lucky 😍
Ordered two amulets. They are beautiful. Thanks for offering them.
Lol.
Idolatry
These migrations are very enlightening. I did a DNA thing & was surprised by the reults (it was mitochondrial so only my mom's lineage) My maternal grandparents immigrated to the US from Austro-Hungary about 100 yrs ago (1918-1920) I expected Germanic & Slavic but got Germanic & Celtic & Scandinavian? This video answers some questions. I knew that the Celts (Keltoi) occupied much of the same territory that the Germantic Tribes did & often wondered if the main difference between them was time & linguistics. ( Already knew Scandi/Germanic was prevalent on my dad's side based on sir names & appearance )
Very interesting video. I live I Norway and my maternal grandfather was from southern Sweden. My genetics at first showed a strong concentration around southeast Norway and southern Sweden. However a more detailed analysis showed me being 58% Norwegian, 21% Swedish and 19% danish and 2% Dutch…
I love finding out another word for a people group refers to a weapon or tool. Saxons - dagger dudes, Angles - hook hoodlums, Franks - axe army. Now the exonym German apparently refers to spears.
Will lingvists agree "ger-man" and "geir-man" is plausible?
The seax, the francia, possibly the geir... Maybe the Langobards is not about long beards but long shafted bardas (axes) like how the hiłlebard was named?
@@maggan82why not both?
The word "ger" for spear first appears about 500 years after the word "germanii" was in use. This theory has been debunked multiple times.
Anglo Saxons were Israelites ie Shemites ie Black people. Stop lying. See Anacalypsis by G Higgins. Some of us went to good schools and the library. Shalom
Now we're talking
I wonder if the Vanir are are result of the Celtic people of Austria and Southern Germany being absorbed. As Norse myths speak about how the Aesir and the Vanir went to war with the Aesir winning.
Austrians in particular developed very late and were a result of bavarians mixing with slavs to the east (austria meaning eastern realm, describing the earlier bavarian east march).
Bavarians themselves are at its core marcomanni from the bohemian woods (bavarri meaning man of bohemia).
Now the name of bohemia is of germanic origin and means home of the boi, which was a celtic tribe. So that would be a clear case of the marcomanni absorbing a large amount of celts.
I do think we would have to go much earlier than that though since its norse myths, probably contact between germanic and celtic people in jutland like the cimbri and teutons.
Very unlikely that those myths have been spread as far north as Scandinavia. Bute likely that the Asar - Vaner war reflects the conflict between the indo-europeans and the earlier population of Scandinavia ( Funnel Beakers) The Asar are the Indo-European Gods anf the Vaner the earlier Scandinavian gods.
@@erikeriksson1660myths about wars between "hunter-farmer-goods" and "pastoralist-goods are found in many indoeuropean cultures.
Great job, todays only you and some other guys like STJ do videos like this.keep going!
تاریخت را بخوان پسر فاحشه صیغهی، افغانها قرنها بر خواهر و مادرت سوار شدند، تو ساخته شدی از نطفه افغان، مادر جنده
My family is Thuringian, Old Frisian, French and Scottish.
THE CRUEL ACTS OF CHARLEMAGNE WILL NOT BE FORGOTTEN. If you Americans really are "proud" of MY Indo European culture then actually be proud of the last REAL Germanic tribes who continued to follow their ancestors beliefs. "I rather die a Heathen with my family in Hel, than live with my enemies in heaven" - Redbad King of Frisia
What makes Karl so great?Father of the Germans and of the French.
@ladygodiva9461 Clovis was the Father of the Franks
Thank you for another fine video . Not seeing your amulet in your store. Will check back.
No dates mentioned till 9:36 min in???
History is fantastic
So glad your video came up on my RUclips feed! Thank you for all your hard work. BTW have you considered having the amulet reproduced? I would love to have a couple...
Really well-done.
I think the amulets are really cool ive been learning to read anglosaxon futhark
Thank you for this very informative video. I have always been interested in learning populations true origins in the world and now it is being confirmed by DNA.
Amulets just came in today, they're beautiful! Thank you and I look forward to your next video!
Interesting and a good compilation of facts of "Germanic people". MY heritage too as I am a rather stereotypical with natural blonde hair.😄That is also backed up if I read my own DNA test as I am a Swede who have 79% Scandinavian, 11 % Finnish and 10 % Baltic heritage genes. The sea (Baltic sea), unites rather than separate as it is a quicker way to travel and not an obstacle. These genes are of course not "native" from the beginning of time but echoes to current regions. Also interesting to note the different ways the Germanic people spread and got assimilated to varying degree in other areas. Also the flows back of Celtic/Germanic mixed populations and that it was not just "spreading out".
Please make a program about the Bavarians !!
Something I actually wondered was how much genetic traces the Romans left in Southern and Western Germany. I'm German, but I look somewhat more Southern European. I always theorised about having some legionaries in my ancestry 😅...
That is very likely Celtic ancestry.
Something I mention in the video is that continental Celts were more akin to southern Europeans. They had a higher percentage of Neolithic farmers ancestry
@@FortressofLughUm dos MELHORES vídeos sobre o assunto,que já me deparei no RUclips,está de parabéns.....
Well, there was the whole Holy Roman Empire with links to the Mediterranean.
I could be wrong about this but Im pretty sure the last line on the amulet says unharmed bac(k) home, not unharmed safe home as you have written in the description. I would assume they didnt add the k in back because the anglo-frisian futhorc did use have a k. Love the channel, keep up the good work!
Happy German Unity Day ❤
Nah man dont put salt in the wound. Germany is not united 2/3 of our country is missing. And to even say this is seen as extremist. The part where the saxon (not anglo saxons) come from is pommern and nord east prussia the saxons are one of the greatest german tribe of which our people are. Our home was given to poland and when you are not fine with it you are a n@zi. This is so sick.
Did these people's have any relation to the scythians ?
Oh boy, here we go
Love the Xenogears music in the intro!
But germani of roman era can also be latin word, garrio manni, man who chatter/speak babble (in the ears of romans), but, yeah spearmen are much cooler.
Not really. The Latin word for man is vir and you do not arrive at the form "Germani" by adding "garrio". That is not how Latin morphology and phonetics work.
Not sure about "spearmen" either. If that were to be derived from gaizaz, it would require rhotacism at a very early stage. For comparison, Gothic still had intervocalic z/s there in the 4th century AD.
@sho-1st-nodame Or the Romans couldn't pronounce an H and replaced it with a G. So Herman's Tribe ? Heheheeh.
@@richern2717 Or "Gegegeeg", as the Romans would have said it.
yeah i don't think "spearmen" is correct because that would require *gaizaz to have rhotacism and internal i-umlaut at way too early of a stage
1200 bce, the celts and Frisii are in the Sea People confederation. You can find traces of them around the Mediterreanean.
You all keep using maps of the area that show the North Sea like it is today. It didn't look like that 3000 years ago.
I had not heard of the Germanic-Celtic continental tribes going back into Scandinavia and altering their DNA, culture and language, but it's interesting to consider. Peoples move and change due to that and there is not one "pure" people even though some might want to believe that. Cool episode, thanks!
I have only heard of the re-migration having an significant impact on the Danish gene-pool. Not further north.
It is most concentrated in Denmark but apparently seems to have gone beyond, at least according to the opinion of those involved in the study.
The sacrifices in the moors of Scandinavia (and Jutland) are constant in a period from 400 b.c to 600 AD. Its the same places which gets the sacrifices = the locals must have stayed ,even after lost battles.
In Jutland there was a turfwar between the Anglians (which had their "capitol" close to todays eckernförde,Very N-Germany) and a people living between the Jutes and the anglians in todays southern Jutland (Todays Denmark) .After these people were ethnically cleansed by the Anglians,the turf war took another character between Jutes and Anglians
The anglians lost,and around 450-500 they probably were absorbed into the jutes. This war has left traces like differnt house styles ,bog-sacrifices and fortifications . There doesnt seem to have been a 3rd part around 350. It would have left traces in ex house building styles.
So if the DNA findings are correct there are other possibilities to consider.
Maybe Hirelings/mercenaries from the outside .
At least 1000 foreign troops (probably "norwegian-german-polish" by todays nations) were ex killed by the jutes and their weapons thrown in a lake close to Illerup Å-dal , so foreign troops have been a factor.
Another possibility is that the foreign DNA has entered through people fleeing from the Huns
Translate page:
danmarkshistorien.dk/vis/materiale/vaabenofringen-i-illerup-aadal-ca-aar-205-evt
da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offermose
English summary
historum.com/t/ritualistic-weapons-sacrifice.140067/
Knowledge of Anglian-Jute conflict : danish historical magazine Skalk
Please see Anacalypsis by G Higgins and dodge the whitewash of the history of Black people. Shalom
The AFRIKANER people who founded modern South Africa in 1652 came from the Dutch Seafaring Entrepreneurs along with French Hugenots and German sailors and craftsmen. Together with local indigenous tribes like the Hottentot developed a unique modern language called AFRIKAANS from Afrika .. is so they say in its structure, closest to the mother tongue of Ancient Germanic of any of the other Germanic languages...
Is this true ?
No i wouldn't say that, but it is closer to older forms of Dutch than the Dutch spoken in the Netherlands.
Germany is fucked. We Germans are foreigners in our on country now.
I mean the original germanic ethnicity is only autochthonous in Northern Germany.. other than that, the population of Germany is predominately mixed with Eastern- (Slavs) and Western (Gallo-Italic) Europeans. People coming from the Middle East, Africa and East Asia just add to the admixture.
@@secco1908 An unnecessary addition to the admixture
@@kimashitawa8113 Yeah, they're genetically not european. Even though the Gallo-Italic admixture has a high amount of Mediterrane influences, from the Roman period as well as Italian traders.
@@secco1908
Look, you got no clue.
Good job Germany.
Slave of the USA Oligarchs with names like Steiner, Goldstein, Silverstein, Morganstein, Dollarstein.
Similar things happened in the USSR too.
Corded Ware was important but, The Bell Beaker and Unetice was just as important to the formation of Germanic peoples.
the important study by McColl et al 2024 has convincingly showed that the germanic ethnic group originated in the area around todays Stockholm, Sweden.
bell beaker never came to Scandinavia
I am Anglo Saxon: Angles come from NW Germany and Saxons come from southern Germany : The unfortunate and dreadful reality of the land now known as the United Kingdom, is filled with a people who in the last hundred years became the largest participant and contributor of the ethnic destruction of Europe.
Most were seriously misled, and the others are traitors
My brother! Soxon comes from Saxxony, the most northern part of Germany bordering Denmark + the Anglo-Saxon immigration/invasion had a large numbers of Jutes/Juts modernday Jutaland (I think, translating in my head from Swedish, anyway modern day Denmark) & you had a large number of Danish vikings coming to modern day UK, creating the Danelaw & centering around York(Jorvik). Also it was the cutting down of holy tree's in Saxxony that started the Viking age having people go viking beyond the Baltic sea... Love, from Scandinavia! Had to watch things like this from time to time & see if they line up with the sagas told to me as young...
PS. What is Europe, but an ethnic destruction? Doesn't matter if it comes from south, north or east. Rarely from west, well maybe some vikings or earlier sea people...
_"The unfortunate and dreadful reality of the land now known as the United Kingdom, is filled with a people who in the last hundred years became the largest participant and contributor of the ethnic destruction of Europe"_
---
Extraction from a conversation between the British top politician and chief diplomat *Arthur Balfour* (1902 - 1905 British Prime Minister, 1915 - 1916 First Lord of the Admiralty, 1916 - 1919 British Foreign Minister) and US diplomat Henry White from the year 1907.
*BALFOUR* : _„We are probably fools not to _*_find a reason for declaring war on Germany_*_ before she builds too many ships and takes away our trade.”_
*WHITE* : _“You are a very high-minded man in private life. How can you possibly contemplate anything so politically immoral as provoking a war against a harmless nation which has as good a right to a navy as you have? If you wish to compete with German trade, work harder.”_
*BALFOUR* : _“That would mean lowering our standard of living. Perhaps it would be _*_simpler for us to have a war._*_ ”_
*WHITE* : _“I’m shocked that you of all men should enunciate such principles.”_
*BALFOUR* : _“Is it a question of right or wrong? Maybe it is just a question of _*_keeping our supremacy_*_ .”_
(Source: Allan Nevins, „Henry White - Thirty Years of American Diplomacy", New York: Harper Bros., 1930, pp. 257-258)
---
England bears an immense responsibility in the destruction of Europe not Germany ...
No,Saxons come from northern Germany.Saxony in the south-east of Germany got its name in the middle-ages from a Saxon Duke from northern Germany.
I missed out on the traveler's amulet! Can you tell me who makes them? Thanks!
0:41 Excellent music edit. 👏
Be really cool if there was more of those travellers amulets…
I wonder if that northward push was when the runes came to Scandinavia. Like the legend says about the runes coming from the dwarves in the south
The runes were made in Scandinavia.
@@erikeriksson1660 The runes actually originated from contact with latin further south. Potentially through the west germanic people first (who of course used runes too before they were christianized around the 8th century).
@@theChaosKe The Runes were modifications of the Latin or Greek alfabet. But much older runes are found in North Germanic languages than in West Germanic language. We have writings in Proto-Norse, written in Runes but no writings from West Germanaic languages from that time.
There was a lot of fighting going on in jutland in this period (around 350)
This can be seen by the weapon sacrifices found in the moors in the pensinsula of Jutland and other places in scandinavia too
Close to Aarhus (Moesgaard museum) at least the equipment of 1000 well armed foreign warriors ended in the moor ,so the locals could defend themself
Since i never heard of archeological findings pointing to a northward push ,the change in dna can be from hirelings/mercenaries/refugees/ people fleeing from the huns
There had been a long turf-war in the peninsula of Jutland between the Jutes and the Anglians ,which the Anglians finally lost about 450. It should be possible to trace how the Anglians first moved northwards from what is the most northern part of Germany from around year 0 and back again around 450 through changes in house building styles.
I have never heard about a change in the middle of this,so a military push from the south ,i doubt it
@@theChaosKe I read that the Etruscan alphabet had some similar characters to the Futhark
French people also have germanic dna…
Die Franken, the Franks, germanic tribe.
My origin is told in the stories of my tribal ancestors that we still have today.
Germanic is the Roman exonym. Teutonic aka D(e)utsch is the endonym that derives from Proto-Germanic þiudiskaz, meaning "of the people". Us Germanic people should simply refer to ourselves as Teutonic. Because that's our own name for ourselves.
Deutsch/Dutch/-tjod ("þiudiskaz") means belonging to a tribe. But us germanics don't have a united tribe, yet live separated into smaller kingships (countries)... it's not part of our ethnic culture to be all-united.
not necessarily the case. it was well after germanic split into its descendents that this term came to be used this way and even then it was only used by west germanic languages in that way. there isn't a very good native proto germanic term to refer to the Germanic people as a whole.
The Cimbri and Teutons were 2 tribes living in the area of Jütland (North-Denmark). 120 B.C they left their home and moved down to the south. Maybe there was a short period in climate. The Romans tried to stop them from invading north-italy but were defeated in 2 or battles. "Furor teutonicus" was a synonim for becoming a berserc. After the tribes split up they were extinguished by the romans. You can read about the Cimbrics Wars in Roman history
Diese Kommentarsektion ist nun Eigentum der Bundesrepublik Deutschlands 🇩🇪
Haha, gut, dass das auf Deutsch ist!
Ya sure…and the federal republic of Germany is the property of Turks , afghanis and Syrians !!! ☘️🖕🏼
Go back to Stalingrad.
Germans are barely germanic
Didn’t you watch the video Germanic is more than just Germany.
The root of the Germanic people and language came from the R1B Kurgan people that settled scandinavia. The dominant haplogroup in Denmark, Norway and Iceland is R1B. All of Europe is at least 50% R1B.
origins of the Europeans. part 2
In 1635, during the reign of Louis XIII, Cardinal Jacques Armen Richelieu founded the French Academy. The Academy set itself the goal of creating a single French language from the languages of the peoples living in France and shaping the French people. A. Richelieu personally supervised this process.
In 1978, Soviet philologist and French language expert S.D. Artamonov wrote about this in his work "History of foreign literature of the 17th-18th centuries": "The Academy contributed to the unification of terms, the speech expression of the language. Everything was moving towards the gradual change of the speech of the people... The Academy he had to compile a single dictionary of the French language, and then vigilantly control its purity and correctness. As a result of the reforms, the French language faded, lost its bright, original colors, but, in turn, became stronger. The strictest clarity, precision and logic were required."
In 1694, the first French dictionary, containing 18,000 words, was compiled at the Academy. The latest edition of this dictionary, the 8th, was completed in 1935 and contained 35,000 words.
Linguist Nikolai Ginov (Tatar) writes in his article "How Jacques Armen Richelieu Created French Literature": "When the reader reads the above... for some reason it seems to him that the French did not have a language before and they could not speak, communicate, write: they were dumb. and so on... and only Richelieu solved this problem... But I want to reassure my impatient reader. They had language, writing, literature; prose, poetry and everything else. But! But in Turkish.
Here are French words of ancient Turkic origin very nicely disguised: pic - peak; egare-lost; jumeler - connect, connect; oubli - to forget; outre - except, besides, outside; sage- wise, obedient; savon - soap; sarein - clear, light; love- juice, strength; signal - signal; silence slalom - slalom; songe - dream, dream; songerie - thoughtfulness, dreaminess; soucoupe - saucer; souler - drink, solder ...
But it was not possible to get rid of 'barbarisms': at first there were two languages, one spoken and the other written."
Lamenting the poverty and limitations of the lexicon legitimized by the Academy, the writer and teacher François Fénelon wrote: "In trying to purify the language, it was restricted and cut off... We must regret the loss of the old language that we find in Maro, Amio, and Cardinal D'Oss: its kind of peculiar brevity, he had simplicity, courage and expressiveness".
Geniuses of 17th century France, Jean Racine, Jean Lafortain and Jean Baptiste Poclen (Moliere), who studied at the "Clermont College" of the Jesuits, played a major role in the formation of the French language and culture.
This was France of the XVII-XVIII centuries, which was considered the center of Catholicism. What was the situation in Russia during this period?
A project called "Russicum" was created in Rome in 1581 under the leadership of A. Possevi for "Rusins". Based on this project, "Greek-Slavic-Latin" colleges were established in the Polish city of Vilno (now Vitebsk, Belarus), which had become the "fortress" of the Jesuits, under the leadership of the Pope's legate A. Possevi.
About this Nikolai Ginov "Who invented the Russian language?" writes in his article: "The first was the work "Slavic-Russian grammar" written by Lavrenty Zizania in Vilno in 1596. However, this work did not find a proper place in Moscow schools because the Latin terminology did not suit Moscow teachers.
Meletiy Smotritsky, the son of a city official from Kamenets, wrote a work called "Grammar of correct syntax of the Slovene language" in Vilno in 1618. "Grammar" was specially prepared for Muscovite Russia, Muscovites, to replace the existing language of Smotritsky - Proto-Bulgarian.
This textbook was republished first in 1648 and then in 1721 as the only relevant textbook in Moscow. Almost all figures of Russian culture, including V.K.Trediakovsky and M.V.Lomonosov, learned the Slavic language from this book.
What was special about this correct phrase? Let's analyze it in more detail, because here the Orthodox pedagogue used a mysterious word - "syntagma".
Of course, this term is considered a Western European term, but it is derived from two Turkish words; "you" is a component and "tag" (tagma) means to bind. A completely understandable explanation for a Muscovite who lived in the late Middle Ages. Because he was educated in Tatar (Turkish) in his ancestral home."
As the researchers noted, this work was written "in an incomprehensible Polish-Russian language". At that time, the population of Moscow poorly understood this language - the Slavic language, or rather, they did not understand it at all, because the population of Moscow at that time consisted of Tatars.
In 1696, the German philologist Heinrich Wilhelm Ludolf, who lived in England, wrote the grammar of the Russian language - "Grammatica Russica" in Latin. Thus, the Jesuits changed the speech of Muscovites. In the next 18th century, all the letters that existed before in Kiev were transferred to the new language.
In the 18th century, the Russian language had many dialects. There was a lot of difference between the dialects. Moscow, which declared itself the III Rome, divided the languages of Moscow into two parts: "Great Russian language" - "velikorusskoye narechiye" and "Little Russian language" - "molorusskoe narechiye". The term Molorossiya was used to refer to the population of the newly conquered lands of Catherine II - present-day Ukraine. Ukrainians were forbidden to speak their own language.
In 1778, F.G. Karin wrote in his "Letter about translators of the Russian language": "The terrible difference between our language and the Slavic language often prevents us from expressing ourselves in the Slavic language except for everyday conversation... After our language was adapted to the Slavic language, the situation became quite shameful."
In the same century, Johann Christian Dahl, a Danish linguist of German origin, came to Russia at the invitation of Catherine II, where he was busy organizing library work. He changed his name to Ivan Matveevich Dal. His son, Vladimir Ivanovich Dal, born in 1801, became not only a Russian citizen, but also a great Russian poet. In addition to Latin, German, French, he also knew Turkish, Tatar and Kazakh languages. He had invaluable services in the formation of the Russian language, in 1840 he wrote the "Explanatory Dictionary of the Great Russian Language". At first the dictionary was banned, but it was republished in 1863 and 1880.In this dictionary, V. Dal gave the beginning of Russian words from European languages, that is, he "proved" that Russian words originated from European words. In the last copy, the word "great Russian language" was replaced by the word "Russian language".
Linguist Gil Nail Favilovich (Bashkir) writes about this dictionary: "I was not surprised when I opened the book 'Ancient Turkic Dictionary' near the Luhansk Cossack... Russian words of ancient Turkic origin. Having studied this rare scientific work up and down, I came to a shocking conclusion - it turns out that there was no Russian language in ancient times. This is a phantom. The calculation here is quite simple: if we remove the words Western European, Turkish and Finnish from this book, the book will remain empty pages."
After 1880, this dictionary was repeatedly edited. One of the editors of the dictionary was the Frenchman Ivan Alexandrovich Baudouin de Courtenay, a descendant of King Louis VI. At the beginning of the 20th century, he completed V. I. Dal's dictionary, became a master of history and philology and a doctor of history in Russia.
When you get acquainted with this information, it becomes clear that there was no Russian language in the 17th century, and the peoples living here spoke Finno-Ugric and Proto-Bulgarian languages. If there was no Russian language, then there was no Russian people. In the 18th-19th centuries, the Slovene language of the Rusyns living in the territory of Rech-Pospolita was "enriched" with European, Finno-Ugric and Proto-Bulgarian languages, and the Russian language was created, and as the local Finno-Urogs and Tatars/Turks spoke this language, they gradually became Russified. The Proto-Bulgarian language was later called the Church-Slavic language.
Russian literary critic and publicist V. G. Belinsky wrote about the difficulty of the Russian language in 1875: "But such progress is possible not only for the young Russian language, which is still in its infancy in every respect, but also for the French language, which is two centuries old... Writing letters in Russian , it's just a pain, the wording is harsh, the grammar and seminary smell, the translations are awkward. If you can't find a Russian equivalent, write the French one, and a good translation will be obtained in the meantime."
Very interesting, thank you for the references. It's something we forget about going back in history; trying to draw borders for empires rather than understanding that there were so many tribes and villages with their own languages and dialects, which will rarely be remembered since the crown only adopts one in order to assimilate as many peasants and armies as possible. My cousin married a gut from the Carpathians and the way he and his groomsmen spoke was so familiar yet so strange it broke my brain a bit haha. I grew up speaking both UA and RU and have a collection of tales told in their many forms and dialects from all over Eastern Europe: there are hundreds. And stull it feels like the tip of the iceberg. It would be lovely to get familiar with French one day and read some of the older, less formal works in various dialects. And props to the Basque peoples for hanging on to their identities for so long.
@@zarinaromanets7290 You are welcome. ı have mentioned it before maybe you have seen it or not. the making of slavs (from Turks is a free book and book from Mrat adji. and here from turkish book ı had translated part1 The Transformation of Turks into Russians.
Extended Version
The Russians are the successors of the Turkish tribes in the region, especially the Tin (Don) Bulgars. The Bulgars of Tin, Bulgarland under Kutrak, the middle son of the Bulgar Khagan Kubrat. Russian history begins as part of Bulgarian and Khazar history. The Otuz Oghuzes, who were first mentioned as Utigur in 545 in Eastern Roman sources, were Turkish tribes who founded the Khazar Khaganate.
The Thirty Oghuzs came under the subordination of the Sak Kagan in the Black Sea Steppe, and then the Kun Khanate in Europe, which took over these places. After the disintegration of the Kun Khaganate, the lands of the Otuz Oghuz clan, which lived as independent communities in the Black Sea Steppe, passed into the hands of the Avars who escaped from the Turkish Khaganate in 557. The Thirty Oghuzs scanned the subordination of the Turkish Khaganate, which captured the North Caucasus and the Black Sea Steppe in 568. After the Turkish Khaganate was divided into two as Eastern and Western Khaganates in 603, the Thirty Oghuzes remained under the subordination of the Western Turkic Khaganate. Böri Şat, who was a shadi of the Khazar tribe, one of the Otuz Oghuz tribes, and a sengun (general) in the army of the Western Turkish Khaganate, was also the commander of the army of the Caspian region during the Third Turkish-Sasanian War in the Caucasus between 627-630. After the disintegration of the Western Turkic Khaganate after 630, the Otuz Oghuz tribes established the Khazar Khanate in the north of the Caucasus under the leadership of the Caspian tribe. The Caspian tribe lived on the lands on the west bank of the river in the lower İdil tribes. The founder of the Khanate was Böri Şad, who was appointed as the ruler of the North Caucasus region by the Western Turkish Khanate. Later, the khanate lands spread to the Crimea and Black Sea Steppes and around the Caspian Sea. The Khazar Khaganate, which was previously an ortunal (central) khanate, turned into a federation of several autonomous regions between the end of the 9th century and the beginning of the 10th century. In the western lands of the Khanate, the region of the Kievan Rus Turks was located. This region, which was directly affiliated to the khanate, gained autonomy in 882, and after the uprising in 965, it became an independent khanate and expanded gradually. In the south of the Kievan Rus lived Hungarians, a union of the San Oğurs and Urogs, a Turkish tribe.
These, too, came to an autonomous position at the same time as the Kievan Ruslan. However, later, as a result of the attacks of the Pechenegs, they left their lands and migrated to Panonia and established their own khanate there. The Oghuz Yabguluk, consisting of 21 tribes in the eastern lands of the Khanate, and the Alan Principality in the north of the Caucasus gained an autonomous position at the beginning of the 10th century and gained their independence after the uprising in 965. The Idil Bulgarians living in the northern lands of the Khazar Khaganate were ruled by the Bulgarian ilteber (governor) affiliated to the khanate. Like the Russians and Oghuzs, the Volga Bulgars established a separate khanate after the uprising. Kınıks, one of the Otuz Oghuz tribes, lived just opposite the area where the Caspian tribe lived, in the north of the Caspian Sea and in the region between the İdil and Yayık rivers. Pechenegs lived in the north of Kınık, on the east and west banks of the Yayık (Ural) River. The Pechenegs were a tribe of Thirty Oghuz who lived on their own, although they were under the rule of the khanate. Later, some of the Pechenegs migrated west to the lands inhabited by the Hungarians. West of the Pechenegs was the territory of another Thirty Oghuz tribe, the Kipchaks. Sarirs lived in the south of Alans, which was also a tribe of Thirty Oghuz. The Sarirs were the Sasanian Parthians in the South Caucasus. The name Russian has been transformed from the word uras/urus/urus/uruzso in Old Turkish dictionaries which means strike (coup), strike and war. In old Uyghur documents, Uruz is also referred to as a male name
@@zarinaromanets7290 part 2 According to the Torluk (official) tariq (date), a troop of Vikings from Sweden came to the Black Sea Steppe in the 9th century, subdued the culturally inferior Slavs and established the first Russian principality in Kiev. Later, these cultured Vikings gradually fused with the Slavs. Today's Russians, Ukrainians and White Russians hardly agree with this. In reality, no one but the Turks came from Sweden to the Black Sea Steppe. Because in the 1st millennium BC Southern Scandinavia was located 124 Origin of the Germans and Slavs
The Turks, who had settled down, established the first principalities in Scandinavia in the 5th century AD. After gaining independence from the Khazar Khanate, the rulers of the Kievan Rus Principality carried the Khanate. For example, Hudud El Alem¹, written in the late 10th century, calls Russian rulers khagans. Russian rulers' use of kagan sanctuary continued until after 1169, when the Vladimir-Suzdal rulers replaced the kagan sanctuary with the condemning (punitive) sanctuary. The word condemning later became Knyaz (KH) with the adoption of the Slavic language. According to the Russian chronicles written in the 16th century, in the 9th century, some Vikings from today's Swedish lands crossed the Baltic to the east and established a state in Novogrod. Swedish Vikings are the successors of the Suyan and Kading Turkish tribes settled in Scandinavia. The Turks on the eastern side of the Baltic Sea called these Turks Varang (varan, reaching). According to the chronicles, the regions of the Eastern Slavs were divided between the Varangians and the Khazars in the 9th century. The Varangians first began collecting taxes from the Slavic and Finnish tribes in 859. In 862, Finnish and Slavic tribes in the Novgorod region revolted against the Varangians, expelled them across the sea, and, refusing to pay more taxes, began to rule themselves. However, as the tribes had no laws of their own, they soon began to fight each other and then summoned the Varang to rule them and bring peace to the region. The accuracy of these chronicles, written in the 16th century, is naturally debatable. Minorsky, V. F., Hudud al Alam, Luzac Co., 1937, London p. 161-162. Brary of Congress Catalog, No: 53-10264 The Russian Primary Chronicle, The Mediaeval Academy of America, Li Julius Brutzkus, "The Caspian origin of ancient Kyiv", Slavonic and East European Review 22, 1944, p. 120. The Origin of the Germans and Slavs 125 According to the chronicles, the three brothers Rurik, Sineus and Truvor settled in Novgorod, Beloozero and Izborsk, respectively. [from the name Rurik, Anik (clean); Sineus, from the name of Şineş (pusan, ambush, warrior); Truvor has evolved from the name Turbar (batur and valiant). After the two brothers died, Rurik became the sole ruler of the realm and the ancestor of the Rurik bloodline. A short time later, two of Rurik's men, Askold and Dir, asked in vain (permission) to go to Tsangrad [Constantinople]. [Askold, As Kalit / Askalt (bouncing high, exalting) from my step; Dir has been transformed from the name Tur (yigit, batur.)]. Heading south, they stormed the small town of Kiev [Coastal House] on the hill, snatching it and the surrounding country from the Caspian, and filling the region with more Varangians, they also established a foothold over the land of the Polyans. A chronicle writes that Askold and Dir went to Constantinople with a fleet to attack in 863-66, and they attacked the city by sacking the surrounding area with one attack. Another chronicle dates the attack to 860. Patriarch Photius describes in detail the destruction of the surrounding and nearby islands. The Russians return without attacking the city, either because of a storm that scatters their ships or because of the Emperor's return. In a later statement, he writes that the Russians could not be harmed because of a god (miracle) after the Patriarch and Emperor's ceremony for the Blessed Virgin. The attack is the first encounter between the Russians and Eastern Rome. The patriarch arcular (decides) to send overlords (priests) to the north to convert the Russians and other tribes to Christianity. In the chronicles, "(880-882) Then [Oleg] came to the heights of Kyiv and saw how Askold and Dir were ruling there. He hid his warriors in boats, left some behind and advanced, carrying [Rurik's son Igor. Askold and Diri killed and they buried them on the hill now known as the Hungarian, where the fortress of Olma [Alma / Elma] is located (...) Oleg opposes himself in Kiev. He wrote." When Rurik was on his deathbed in 879, Oleg, who was close, asked him to rule his principality as the atabe (regent) of his younger son Igor [Oleg's name is Alık, which means light red in Old Turkish, and Elig / nüş, which means ruler. However, Elig / llig The name Igor has been transformed from Agar, which means honor in Old Turkish.] In 880-82, Oleg attacked south along the Ozi (Dnieper) River and first captured Smojersk and Lubeç. Then he captured Kiev, dethroned Askold and Dir and killed him. By declaring himself a khan, he made Kiev the center (center) of the Russian Principality. - his life) In the chronicles, the 10th century He writes that the tribes living in the north of the Black Sea every year established many cities here and that these tribes were Sak (Scythian) tribes. "They were numerous, they lived on the shores of Ozi (Dniester). They lived in cities that were theirs to this day. The Greeks [Eastern Romans] called them the Great Scythians. (...) The Varangians, the Slavs and all who accompanied him [Oleg] the others were called Rus. (...) Leaving Igor in Kiev, Oleg attacked the Greeks [Eastern Romans], so a large number of Varang, Slav, Chud, Krivic who were pagan , Merili, Polyanli, Sever, Derevli, Radimicli, Croat, Dulebli and Tiverk. All these tribes are known to the Greeks [Eastern Romans] as Great Scythians." Even in these chronicles, which were written 800 years after the events, it is stated that these tribes, which are said to be Scandinavian, Slavic and Uralic societies today, are Saklar (Turks). The Origin of All these Germanic and Slavs 127
They belonged to the Khazar Khaganate, and the sum of the tribes that taxed them was called Rus. According to the chronicles, these tribes received one sword per rak Ocak (household). In the chronicles, Oleg, son (relative) of the Novogrod lord Rurik, who came from Scandinavia in 882 and was a Varang, captured (declared) himself lord by capturing a Khazar city of Kiev, and gave it to the Varans and Slavs and Oleg. It is written that all other tribes accompanying e are called Rus (Urus). The name of the Polyan tribe, one of the tribes known as the Great Scythian, has been transformed from the old Turkish word bulgan, which means angry, angry. This is where the name of today's Poles comes from. The name of the Derevli tribe has been transformed from the word ireklig, which means the old Turkish tree. The Russian word derevliane meaning forest is derived from the word drevo (nepeno) meaning tree. This word has been transformed into Russian from the old Turkish word tirek, which means pole, poplar, tree, forest. In Old Turkish, tireklik means place where trees grow, and tireklik (direkli) means one who has a tree. The name Krivic is derived from the old Turkish word kerig, which means wide. The name of the Sever tribe has been transformed from the name Sabir / Subar / Suvar. A part of the Suvars remained among the Tin Bulgars. The name of the Duleb / Dulib tribe has been transformed from the old Turkish word tulib, which means full, complete, perfect. The name of the Tiverk tribe has been transformed from the word teler /teper, which means the one who oppresses, oppresses and hits. The name of the Radimic tribe has been transformed from the word oath, which means clean, flawless, holy. Probably the name of this tribe was Antmış. On the other hand, the Chuds and Merilis are Urog tribes who are not Turks but are descended from Turks. According to the Kronks, Oleg began to build fenced cities and taxed the Slavs. He ordered the city of Novgorod to pay annual taxes to the Varangians. He himself was a taxpaying national of the Khazar Khaganate. Although this chapter in the chronicles has an epic air, Oleg 128 The Origin of the Germans and Slavs in Kyiv and its environs in 882.
It is understood that it became an autonomous principality under the Khazar Khaganate under his administration. The people living here were Bulgarians of Tin. Thus, the Khazar Khaganate controlled a very large region up to Novogrod by the hands of Kyiv. After gaining independence from the Khazar Khaganate in 965, Vladimir, who proclaimed (declared) his khanate, converted to Christianity in 988. [The name Vladimir changed from Balat Imir (Steel Dawn) to Balat Mar (Mar means lord / manager). The second option seems more realistic]. However, the Christianization process of the Tengrist Russians took quite a long time, because the society was showing great resistance to this new religion. When the chroniclers decided (decided) to endorse a new faith instead of the "traditional idol worship" of the Slavs [such was Tengrism to the Christians], he sent his most valuable advisers and warriors as emissaries to different regions and learned about Islam, Judaism, and Christianity. specifies. Vladimir disapproves of Islam because Islam forbids alcohol, among many other things. However, the Russians, like all the Old Turks, were a society that loved to drink. Nor does he approve of Judaism, for the God of the Jews had in vain (permitted) his chosen ones to be expelled from their own country. Thus, Vladimir chooses Christianity. In reality, Vladimir converted to Christianity in order to get the support of Eastern Rome against the Khazar Khanate and the emperor II.late lands in the north.
@@zarinaromanets7290 part 3 Thus, Vladimir chooses Christianity. In reality, Vladimir converted to Christianity in order to get the support of Eastern Rome against the Khazar Khanate and the emperor II. He established ties with Eastern Rome by marrying Basil's sister Anna. Hudud al-Alam describes the Russian region as follows: "There are Pechenegs mountains in the east of this country. There is the Ruta River in the south, the Saklabs [Saklar / "Slavs"] in the west, and desolate lands in the north. It is a vast country and its inhabitants are bad-tempered, stubborn, arrogant-looking, belligerent and warlike, they fight and defeat all the other heathens living around them.
Page 129
The name of the brain is Rus-Kağan. By its nature, it is a country that is highly preferred in terms of all life necessities. Some of them do bravery. Respectful treatment of the doctors [kams], Every year they pay the sultan [Caspian khaganma] ten percent (ten percent) of their loot and bad (trade) earnings. Among them live a group of Saklabs who serve them, about 100 cubits [about 70 meters. However, it has to be 10 cubits (7 meters).] They wear shalwarlandic trousers made of cotton fabric and tuck them on their knees. They wear wool caps with their tails falling behind their necks. They put their dead with all their belongings, together with food and drink in the kurgan (grave). They are buried together with 38 pieces of hush objects.Olülere yaba (Kyiv) is the Russian city closest to the Islamic lands. It is a pleasant place and the khan resides here. They produce various furs and valuable swords. Slaba to the Bulgarian region for the slave (trade) of his people when peace prevails. Urtab [it has to be Rostov] is a city where foreigners are killed at every sight (at the sight of). And they produce swords and swords.” Again, Hudud al-Alam defines the Tin Bulgars, which he calls Inner Bulgars, as follows: “There is Mirvat in the east, the Gurz Sea [Black Sea] in the south, Saklablar in the west, and the Russian mountain in the north. It is a country without cities. Its inhabitants are brave, warlike, and fearsome. Their nature is similar to that of the Turks living near the Caspian land. The Inner Bulgarians are at war with all the Russians, but they continue to trade with everyone around them. They have sheep, stuffing (weapons) and means of war."9 According to the 10th century traveler, the Jew Ibrahim Ibn Yaqub, the Khazarians spoke the language of Saklabla (Slavs). This language was Turkish naturally. "Minorsky, V. F., Hudud al Alam , Luzac Co., 1937, London p. 159. Ibid., p. 160 Dunlop, D. M., Khazar Jewish History, Selenge Publications, Istanbul, 2019 35 130 The Origin of the Germans and Slavs
According to Istahri, who lived in the 10th century, the Russians used to sit on three chairs. This city was larger than the Bulgarian cities of Idil. it was One cluster was close to the Idil Bulgars. Their lords are in Kiev These are the Bulgarians of Spirit. The second cluster lived further away from the first. These have to be Novogrod Russians. The chief of the third group lived in the city of Ersa. Ersa should be the city of Rostov. People used to go to Kiev for ködu (trade). However, there was no mention of any foreigner going to Ersa. Ersa society used to kill people who set foot on it. Sable fur and lead were brought from Ersa. The fox skins of Burtas (Kipchak-Janm region) were also brought from here. The Russians were a people who cremated their dead. The künges (concubines) of the rich were cremated together with their masters of their own accord. Some of the men would cut their beards, and some of them would braid it like a zuluf. They used to go to the Eastern Rome, the Caspian, Bulgar, to the köduye (trade). They were neighbors to Eastern Rome from the north. They were so powerful that they collected taxes from Eastern Rome.¹¹ Russian knights (traders) used to pay a tax at the rate of one-tenth of the goods to the Khazar khan for the furs and swords they brought. The Khazar Khaganate levied house (household) or plow tax from national tribes. This tax was taken in the form of a sword or money. After the middle of the 10th century, the Khazar Khaganate was no longer able to collect taxes from the İdil Bulgars, which was dependent on it, and its relations with Eastern Rome deteriorated. Because Eastern Rome was in unity with the Pechenegs against the Khazar Khaganate. After the disintegration of the Khazar Khaganate, the Pechenegs were oppressing the Caspian lands from their homeland between the Idil and Tin rivers. Russian relations with the Pechenegs were complex. Because they were forming alliances with each other or against each other. However, in the First Chronicle, Russian 4.247 of the Pechenegs in 915, "Dunlop, D. M., History of the Khazar Jewish, Selenge Publications, Istanbul, 2019, While stating that he entered his territory and then made a peace, he writes that he started the war with the Russians again in 920. The Khazar Khaganate had begun to lose its control over the Turkish tribes in the country at the beginning of the 10th century. The independent behavior of the Turkish tribes Russians, Bulgarians, Oghuzs, Pechenegs and Kipchaks led to the weakening of the khanate. The first uprising came from the Russians. It was suppressed. Later, a large part of the Pechenegs migrated to the Russian region because they could not get along with the other Oghuz tribes in the east, and meanwhile they attacked the Khazar khanate armies, causing confusion in the country. The Hungarians, the union of the Yellow Oğurs and the Urogs, lived in the south of the Russians, previously under the Khazar Khaganate. Later, due to the Pecheneg attacks, they migrated to the west and settled in Panonia (Today's Hungarian Plain). The Kabars, one of the powerful tribes on which the Khazar Khanate was based, rose up in the early 9th century and lost the power struggle, then left the khanate and joined the Hungarian Union and later migrated to Panonia with them. In the first half of the 10th century, the Russians, İdil Bulgars and the Oghuz tribes in the east were now out of control. One of the biggest factors that led to the purification (weakening) of the Khazar Khaganate was the separation of the Kiniks, a very powerful tribe, from the khanate in the beginning of the 10th century, under the leadership of Sübaşı Selçuk Bey, within the Otuz Oghuz union that founded the Khazar Khaganate. Seljuk Bey, in disagreement with the Khazar khan, migrated to the eastern Oghuz Yabgulu lands, which were in conflict with him, although he was affiliated with the Kınık tribe, of which he was the chief. In 912 Oleg sent his subjects to Constantinople to make a peace treaty with Eastern Rome. After Oleg's death in 913, his relative Igor took his place. Os 132 The Origin of the Germans and Slavs
While stating that he entered his territory and then made a peace, he writes that he started the war with the Russians again in 920. The Khazar Khaganate had begun to lose its control over the Turkish tribes in the country at the beginning of the 10th century. The independent behavior of the Turkish tribes Russians, Bulgarians, Oghuzs, Pechenegs and Kipchaks led to the weakening of the khanate. The first uprising came from the Russians.
@@zarinaromanets7290 sorry ı could not upload the rest but ı have a group on face book slavs an their turkic origin. a lot about the Carpatians croarts serbian, hungars, dacians and bulgars turkishnes when proximitly the transformation and resets happened.
Very interesting documentary but we must treat his assertion that the Tollense battlefield represents a pitched battle between proto Germanic and Proto Celtic forces with extreme caution. He may well be right but archaeologists so far have not been able to attribute language or culture to any of the bones or weapons found at the site
So it seems that probably half of the Germanic peoples carry Germanicized Celtic (especially Austria and England), Slavic (South-West Germany and surrounding areas) and EEF (for almost all especially I/E/J carriers) Y-DNA.
Slavic come from the East.
Wdym
@@RackerPaSThe study used to make this video makes the bizarre claim that SW Germany (a region never inhabited by Slavs) is more Slavic than North/Central Germany (a region historically partially inhabited by Slavs). We should take such claims with a grain of salt until we get more information.
@@EnglishShieldwallEast Germans have less Slavic dna than west Slavs I find pretty funny that Slavs overhype east germany even though they’re land wasn’t even Slavic until the migration period.
@@jesusismyhelp9005 which makes the claim that Swabians have Slavic DNA even more unbelievable.
Great work
👍👍 Good stuff
German actually refers to more than just the people of Germany. It also refers to Austria and Luxembourg and Switzerland. This is because these countries also speak a dialect of Modern German and were part of the Holy Roman Empire until the end and descended from the tribes that created modern Germany rather than the tribes that created the other Germanic countries.
no. German refers to the people of Germany only.
@@romain6275 it refers to a large ethnic group too of all people descended from German tribes and speak German. Austrians, Luxembourgers, Lichtensteiners, and Swiss Germans are all German.
@@romain6275 German is not just a nationality but an ethnic group.
Can you do video about Baltic-Finns?
Absolutely.
Where does Wooton fit in?
May i ask,who give name of Scotiland and scots,is verry weird,in bulgarian,scotovudstvo(скотовъдство) mean animal husbandry and they used bagpipe,as bulgarian,hihihi in other side of Europe.The world is small.Healt and happynes
From what I could find is that Scotland derives their name from the Scotti tribe who originally migrated from Ireland.
A striking similarity between pictographic writing _ Germania & Mohen jo daro
which is U. Does it denote the Almighty or something spiritual ? Another similarity is suffix ani in Persia Sindhi on the one hand & Germania Romania Armenia on the other Deciphering is easier if we compare pictographic writing
Good one
Thank you!
10/10 Love ❤
In regards to your thumbnail. I know some one who keeps his hair in this Saxon style . Eric is from Dusseldorf . And he is probably reading this comment now .