American Attack Was So Well Coordinated That No Japanese Could Fail To Realize What Was Happening

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 июн 2024
  • (Memoirs of Guadalcanal; Series; Last Part) Delve into the gripping narrative of one of WWII's most crucial campaigns as we uncover the harrowing struggles, heroic deeds, and strategic maneuvers that defined this intense battle for control of the Pacific. Witness the sacrifices and triumphs of soldiers on both sides as we explore this historic turning point. Prepare to be captivated by the epic tale of Guadalcanal in this must-watch exploration of military history.
    Playlist: • Memoirs of Guadalcanal

Комментарии • 82

  • @WW2Tales
    @WW2Tales  29 дней назад +13

    Ladies And Gentlemen this is Last Part of Memoirs of Guadalcanal!
    Playlist:ruclips.net/p/PLGjbe3ikd0XFX7IqfQpOZ_LM1jU0bMOAQ
    Part 1:ruclips.net/video/n0oUci-pHJ4/видео.html
    Part 2:ruclips.net/video/zcBGbPGCWAw/видео.html
    Part 3:ruclips.net/video/Muibtg-xNrA/видео.html
    Part 4:ruclips.net/video/YCabKoL7T2M/видео.html
    Part 5:ruclips.net/video/r0ZJWZtshis/видео.html
    Part 6:ruclips.net/video/tdaLA7IgDak/видео.html
    Part 7:ruclips.net/video/dXy08RX6EuU/видео.html
    Part 8:ruclips.net/video/TY2F6ffbYFs/видео.html
    Part 9:ruclips.net/video/BQDSN7Wc-sc/видео.html

    • @darenmorgan4280
      @darenmorgan4280 26 дней назад

      .)¹9❤y😢

    • @mrt2this607
      @mrt2this607 10 дней назад

      So much history and obscure facts of specific battles of ww2. And does anyone else think it's a bit strange that we were allies then in late 1930's-1945, and it was just 160 something years since our War of Independence from the UK in the late Seventeen hundreds thru 1780's? Damn, does time move fast. Brits had German mercenaries as allies, we had France/Spain/~Dutch , and now probably with most former adversaries have been & are still allies/friends with. So in relation to ww2 and the path we took to get us to those points of many past conflicts... and conflicts today- we're once again skating on the thin ice of the Half frozen global-sized-conflict lake. Gotta say it, the very-gone guy and his friends currently "running"(into the ground) Our country are destroying this place, risking loss of many of those allies, friends, & current potential friends are being weakened or ruined by this group/admin. Doing it with smiles on their faces, knowing the purposeful destruction & suffering being caused, every day getting crazier and not done yet. Not a chance things calm down in the coming months. Driving division to get us to fight and destroy eachother. So don't worry, if we don't do a good enough job with eachother, they've brought such a huge mass of people as an insurance policy. How many hundreds or thousands would it take for a not-so-patriotic group to cause deliberate and absolute chaos in towns, a small city or even somewhat large cities across America? How many more large opponents need to have a very bad relation with our group of asylum patient diplomats and Our People? Things look "great" huh, we should just totally keep doing what "we're" doing and not make any changes.....down with these eyes wide shut L 00 /\/attics.
      like/love America and are here to become American? How's things looking with all of our former advisaries

  • @peterlovell4617
    @peterlovell4617 25 дней назад +23

    "The only value of any portion of any of those islands were for the airfields or potential airfields. There was no other value to them. The Allies should have simply waited until they had achieved naval superiority before attempting to gain control of any of those islands"
    You overlook the obvious - there would be NO naval superiority until air superiority had been achieved. The airfields were the key to the whole war.

    • @mustrumridcully3853
      @mustrumridcully3853 День назад

      No, the airfields gave the USA the ability to project heavy bombers. They already had air superiority from the sheer number of carriers.

  • @RonGreeneComedian
    @RonGreeneComedian 23 дня назад +12

    A friend of mine, now deceased, was a Marine, serving in both World War II and Korea. He stated that once the beaches were secure, he could not step without stepping on an American serviceman.

  • @richardtardo5170
    @richardtardo5170 29 дней назад +36

    How do you call it just a defensive action, a victory IS a victory. Japan was forced to abandon the island.

    • @muzikizfun
      @muzikizfun 29 дней назад +5

      War is a friction between 2 opposing forces. As they grind away at each other, the one who "wins" is the one best able to make up the loses suffered in this grinding.

    • @Chris-fn4df
      @Chris-fn4df 26 дней назад +4

      People use all sorts of euphemisms to soften the blows received, and to pour salt in the wounds inflicted. The capacity for humans to do this did not suddenly appear in our nature with the advent of the internet.

    • @johncarey4040
      @johncarey4040 25 дней назад +8

      It's a personal memoir, appreciate it for what it is and that we have that perspective. You don't have to get butt hurt about it

    • @Chris-fn4df
      @Chris-fn4df 22 дня назад +1

      @@johncarey4040 If anyone says anything someone else doesn't like, there is always a douche that has to retort with 'don't be butthurt'.
      You are butthurt about him being butthurt.

  • @kensmith8152
    @kensmith8152 29 дней назад +30

    The Achilles heel of both Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan was at while at times they could effectively tactically fight battles, like the failures at Stalingrad for the Germans and Guadalcanal for the imperial Japanese, logistics and the ability to keep their soldiers supplied in the field proved to be their undoing in the end!
    While being obsessed on winning battles, they failed at the bread and butter and the needs of their men!
    Whereas the Americans had developed and mastered the science of logistics as far back as the civil war. The over extension of their supply lines cost them the war!
    They never learned that an army can only live off the land for so long

    • @MikeJohnson-de3zf
      @MikeJohnson-de3zf 29 дней назад +4

      I think your point about the US learning the importance of logistics in the civil war is a good one.

    • @davidsmith7372
      @davidsmith7372 28 дней назад

      So true . And very well said .

    • @Chris-fn4df
      @Chris-fn4df 26 дней назад +3

      Logistics and keeping troops supplied had been the most fundamental part of warfare since the Bronze Age. The Nazi’s inability to see just how badly they would lose the logistics war is an absolute reflection of their stupidity in the art of war - thinking that victory on the battlefield is victory in war is a total beginner move, and one that Germany had learned many times before.
      The bottom line is that they simply were not good at war. Battles are a small part of war. You need to be good at ALL of it - doubly so if you are the aggressor. The Nazi’s stupidity is just that: stupidity.

    • @kensmith8152
      @kensmith8152 26 дней назад

      @@Chris-fn4df: I think the German hubris goes back to their victory over the French in the Franco Prussian war.
      Because for Germany it seemed so simple to win by overwhelming their opponents.
      In WW1 none of the leaders had the insight of self inflection to understand why they lost, and immediately started to blame the Jews for allegedly stabbing Germany in the back.
      In WW2 the want for revenge and the self deception of their own sense of superiority propelled them along to their destruction because the couldn’t imagine that their enemies could fight or out think them at their own game!
      Another area where they were absolute idiots was in the area aptly named intelligence, or in the German’s case, lack of it.
      The allies early on had broken the enigma code, they had infiltrated the German spy agency and turned the agents against them, and the Allies had developed various superior programs that had kept the Germans guessing all the time.
      One of my favorite was when the British turned a manor into a resort for captured German leaders, wining and dining them while at the same time recording all their conversations!
      Churchill was furious at first but realized the valuable intel and information acquired!
      The Germans were like an evil Sheldon Cooper, but without the personality. They were indeed smart in many ways no doubt about it, or else they wouldn’t have got as far as they did, it’s just that they were blinded by their myopic reason and hubris, often not really learning from their mistakes and thinking the lunatic that was leading them knew what he was doing and had their best interests at heart!

    • @bobl1769
      @bobl1769 26 дней назад +5

      I think it was Napoleon who said that an army marches on its stomach. That is why canned food was invented by the French for the French army.

  • @timcurry192
    @timcurry192 29 дней назад +28

    Interesting fact: the period of August 1942 - February 1943 during which Guadalcanal was fought happened to coincide with another pivotal campaign: Stalingrad. Bad times for the Axis.

    • @kevinmoore7975
      @kevinmoore7975 28 дней назад +4

      And El Alamein and Torch in North Africa. In total, a global reverse from which the Axis never recovered.

    • @jamieforrest6575
      @jamieforrest6575 26 дней назад +1

      And even if the individual men
      survived they'd sacrificed their youth to become prematurely old as many were so young.(Now I'm pushing 60 anyone in their 20s Are young)

    • @bbmtge
      @bbmtge 24 дня назад

      Nobody knew that. Thank you.

    • @nicholasconder4703
      @nicholasconder4703 24 дня назад +2

      Don't forget the battle in New Guinea along the Kokoda Track and Buna Campaign, El Alamein and Operation Torch. So, five pivotal Axis defeats took place during the same time frame.

    • @timcurry192
      @timcurry192 23 дня назад +1

      @@nicholasconder4703 Excellent points, all. People looking for the pivot of the war need look no further than this period.

  • @richardtardo5170
    @richardtardo5170 29 дней назад +19

    The air war was clearly won by the Americans, victory.

    • @erichughes284
      @erichughes284 29 дней назад +3

      Dont forget about the marines

    • @jameshannagan4256
      @jameshannagan4256 28 дней назад

      It was Guadalcanal that was the death knoll for the best Japanese pilots they were using carrier pilots for for long range sorties that were a death sentence for any pilot with a damaged plane. If the Japanese army would have added some air cover on the newer bases that they built while the battle was still in doubt they might have turned the tide. Their piecemeal application of their superior naval forces didn't help either if they went all out and moved faster they could have won.

  • @davidsmith7372
    @davidsmith7372 29 дней назад +7

    Thanks for another great series. Keep up the good work.

  • @RonaldReaganRocks1
    @RonaldReaganRocks1 20 дней назад +2

    Wow! Guadalcanal was about an 8:1 kill to death ratio for America! That is a staggering blowout! 24,000 Japanese deaths to 3,000 American.

  • @marccrotty8447
    @marccrotty8447 24 дня назад +1

    How sad to hear of so many common soldiers dying on this Island.

  • @icewaterslim7260
    @icewaterslim7260 18 дней назад +1

    Guadalcanal was hardly Tinaka's fault. Once you find yourself supplying troops with submarines and destroyers at night you are already fighting a losing war, Yamamoto banished Tinaka and Mikawa both to the boondocks for not winning battles good enough and replaced them with commanders that couldn't win a battle at all. Both had to consider risking national assets that weren't going to be replaced based on what they knew at the time . . . Or didn't know in Mikawa 's case pertaining to the whereabouts of our carriers. Hindsight is 20/20 but stripping the IJN of their best commanders works to our advantage.

  • @factchecker9358
    @factchecker9358 5 дней назад

    Defeat from the jaws of defeat

  • @usablellc6735
    @usablellc6735 12 дней назад +1

    Very interesting but would be much better with maps.

  • @MrVattugatan
    @MrVattugatan 19 дней назад +1

    Please add maps.

  • @MikeRoth-ex1wk
    @MikeRoth-ex1wk 20 дней назад +2

    Robot can't tell day from night.

  • @Perktube1
    @Perktube1 25 дней назад

    46:56 - At four thirty am, in the afternoon… 😅

  • @tswizard13
    @tswizard13 26 дней назад +1

    At 430 AM in the afternoon ??|||

  • @davidhatton583
    @davidhatton583 8 дней назад

    Again the Japanese fighting code hurt themselves…. In the entire war they never made a serious successful attack on transports. As the British discovered in the Falklands transport losses could have a huge effect on operations. The Japanese never learned that even though they suffered hugely from American efforts in that direction…. But on the macro scale… the Japanese would have had to isolate Hawaii to be victorious enough for the Americans to even consider an armistice

  • @maureenmckenna5220
    @maureenmckenna5220 20 дней назад +2

    Just remember that Midway was six months after Pearl Harbor. Midway was the turning point because four Japanese carriers were destroyed, and their sea power decimated. Six months. The Americans had broken the Japanese code and could place themselves in strategic areas.

  • @Kombatkegz
    @Kombatkegz 22 дня назад

    Fog of war

  • @bobauft6462
    @bobauft6462 19 дней назад +1

    Boring Graphics!

  • @MrDavePed
    @MrDavePed 29 дней назад +12

    The only value of any portion of any of those islands were for the airfields or potential airfields. There was no other value to them. The Allies should have simply waited until they had achieved naval superiority before attempting to gain control of any of those islands. The Allies, once naval superiority had been established, should have simply surrounded any valuable real estate (based on the value of their airfields or potential airfields) and denied further acces to such areas by any enemy naval forces.
    Obviously, without supply, it would have only been a matter of time for the occupying land forces to become nearly powerless. Only THEN should any Allied land forces be dedicated to gaining contol of the island.
    Instead, we threw young lives away by the tens of thousands because of political impatience and military myopia.
    ..

    • @mikespangler98
      @mikespangler98 29 дней назад +8

      You are forgetting two things, the threat to the supply lines to Australia, and the Japanese drive to Port Moresby.
      Guadalcanal forced the Japanese to give up on Port Moresby. They were within sight of the lights of the city when the orders came to withdraw because the high command had decided Guadalcanal was more important. General Horii was not happy.

    • @MrDavePed
      @MrDavePed 29 дней назад +2

      @@mikespangler98 The reason they were forced to abandon Guadalcanal was because their soldiers had no supplies. Japan was extremely vulnerable to supply problems. The United States was going to gain naval superiority in a matter of months. Everybody knew that. It was not a contested expectation.
      There was no need to throw away thousands of young lives the way they did. It would have been impossible for the Japanese to keep Port Moresby supplied. The Allies should have allowed Japan to overextend to the maximum of their own shortsightedness. Conversely, the supply lines between Australia and the United States were not critical to either party and were only vulnerable for the first twelve months of the war in any event. Tens of thousands of young lives were wasted because of stupidity and a total lack of imagination. Allied commanders knew well enough the effectiveness of skipping large concentrations of enemy forces on unwanted islands.
      The useful islands with useful air fields could have been just as easily gained with a little extra patience.
      ..

    • @currentbatches6205
      @currentbatches6205 29 дней назад +9

      Read Frank's "Guadalcanal"; if it weren't for Henderson Field, the US would not have won naval superiority in the Solomons until much, much later. No military leader who wants to remain such is going to tell his superiors: "We'll just wander around here for a year or so".

    • @joechang8696
      @joechang8696 29 дней назад +2

      the attempt by Japan to contest Guadalcanal was done at enormous logistical cost. Forget the lost of two battleships, various cruiser, destroyers and all those merchant/transports. The big items were skilled pilots and fuel consumed on the resupply.
      From their bases to Guadalcanal was the extreme range for the Zero. Flying for several hours at economical cruises speed really saps one strength. Then if you take damage to the plane or worse the pilot, getting back was even more painful/risky.
      All that, even with material superiority, until you learn to fight, in part meaning figuring out which commanders knew how to fight, fighting with a big superior force is just going to mean bigger losses.

    • @MrDavePed
      @MrDavePed 29 дней назад +2

      @@joechang8696 America's strength was the war of attrition. Instead of milking that strength for everything it was worth they threw away our young lives for absolutely no reason.
      The total dead or missing were 41,592 for all U.S. Army ground troops in the Pacific and southeast Asia, with another 145,706 wounded. The Marine Corps and attached Navy corpsmen suffered total casualties of 23,160 killed or missing and 67,199 wounded.
      Nearly all of those lives could have been spared with intelligent patience which is precisely what the high command was paid to administer.

  • @user-ci2mn1oy3w
    @user-ci2mn1oy3w 29 дней назад +1

    the US airforce and Navy were a bunch of clowns

    • @thenaturalmidsouth9536
      @thenaturalmidsouth9536 23 дня назад +3

      The U.S. Navy outclassed the Japanese navy by leaps and bounds over the course of the war in the Pacific. The Japanese never had ANY admirals in the same class as Nimitz, Spruance, etc. Yamamoto was way overrated. The Japanese navy was more concerned with fighting its greatest enemy; the Japanese Army.

    • @richardmatthys7133
      @richardmatthys7133 18 дней назад

      An idiot speaks

  • @RonGreeneComedian
    @RonGreeneComedian 23 дня назад +1

    A friend of mine, now deceased, was a Marine, serving in both World War II and Korea. He stated that once the beaches were secure, he could not step without stepping on an American serviceman.