I think she dodged a bullet. Imagine taking a woman that you broke up with twice to court for a ring that she already gave you more than what it was worth. I'd lose my mind.
Yep, by her logic when he purchased them a house she would have said "I did all the searching for the house and all he did is pay for it so it's really MY house and he should be happy that I offered to give him anything" Instead of saving him $1000 on the ring she wanted she instead pocketed a thousand dollars of his money. That's next level usury...
Or he screwed her over. Keep in mind that he broke up with her twice. Not once while he was with her after she sold the ring did he mention her paying the $2700. This was a bogus judgment.
@jessicaarmstrong5035 it's no different than when an employer gives yo a laptop to use.v it's not a gift to you. It's only for you use whist you are employed. If your boss suspends you then later decided to continue to employ you,. That laptop doesn't suddenly become Your property. It is only for your use whilst you are employed with that company. A ring is no different. It's for a prospective WIFE. IF YOU are no longer a wife, then the property provided ONLY for that reason goes back to it's legal owner. That ring is put on a specific finger of a specific person to signify to the world that that person is married and no longer on the open market. When that person returns to the open market after a marriage, then that property no longer retains any value since that person is no longer in a relationship with the property owner. Why on earth would anyone want to retain product that's express purpose was to signal they were tied to the specific person who provided the signal of a specific relationship? An anniversary GIFT is just that, a gift. A ring is NOT a gift. It's a symbol of attachment to the person who requested a monogamous relationship. Ending the relationship ends the purpose of the ring since you are no longer part of the relationship it's ONLY purpose was to signify.
She sold that ring for more than they paid for it because she got a great deal. She worked in that business, and that ring was worth way more than 7,700.
Yes it was worth $10,000 as they said, a standard discount for people working in the jewellery business is 30%. So she would likely have sold it for at least $9000. She should have just returned the ring, although she is correct he wouldn't have been able to get more than $4000 for it if he sold it back to a store.
@@shendisackett No she specifically said here that she got $7000 for it, not $10K or $9000. And yes she's right that he wouldn't have been able to get more than $4000 for it. You can't get brand new pricing for a ring that you used. She wore the ring and thus it was a used ring. Even if it was worth $10K the most he would've gotten was $3333, about 1/3 of the price. Her giving him $5000 was more than fair. I can't believe JJ did this. The defendant should appeal.
I don't think she's a gold digger. I do think she's being petty... I'm ok with that. He broke it off, she didn't do anything deceitful. And I do agree with Ann Landers and she should keep the ring. #Petty4TheWin
The defendant has the arrogance to start quoting the law to Judge Judy. She should have given him back the ring and said Goodbye. He had a lucky escape from the defendant in my opinion !
As I thought, she had all kinds of excuses, ranging from giving a kickback to what he'd get if he sold it on consignment to her time and effort getting the ring. But the one I absolutely believe was the primary motive was when she claimed "he hurt her" by calling off the engagement. It's not a legal defense. I think looking back at this, both parties will agree that not getting married was one of the best decisions of their lives.
I agree he should have got the full amount. The usual discount for people working in the jewellery business is 30% which tracks as the ring was valued at $10,000. I think she probably managed to get around $9k for it, if she's a good saleswoman. She is right though that if he had sold the ring to a jewellery store he would be lucky to get $4k, and it would probably be less. He should have been given the full purchase price back though. It seems she then did steal all her boss' contacts to open her own store!
True. However, he was about to get nothing. Aah-zip. As soon as he opened his mouth on hearing the verdict, I said, "Don't Speak! Just take the money."
She's a lιar, if the ring is insured for 10k, then it is worth 10k. JJ can only go by what she said she sold it for, which is 7k, but we all know she's a lιar
Yeah, her boss probably sold it for $10,000 and she gave him $1000 and kept $4000 profit. JJ should have given him $2700 to return the full value but she just thinks the entire sell should go to him, in this case the $2000 she claims to have pocketed. She probably pocketed $2000 more.
The woman just said there is a 66.6% mark up on the jewelry and she, as somebody that is in the business, charged her soon to be husband full retail price for the ring. Somebody made a lot of money on that ring.
Why wouldn't Judge Judy have asked her for a bill of sale? If she didn't have it or couldn't provide receipts then she should have given the plaintiff the full appraised amount.
I thinks he hadn't quite figured things out back then. Now, all the viewers like us know exactly what should have been done in her ruling her judgment.
0:26 This woman is so full of SHHHHHH!! Judy should make her cough up the receipt for the sale, she got it at a great price through her connection, so she sold it for a lot more than 7K, she probably sold it for 9 or 10 K. I don't know why Judy is taking her at her word?
@@Sherwoody Yes her limit is 5K, however he already received a 5K cheque, so she could still award him another 5K, in the end Judy didn't believe her, but did not ask for proof of the sale.
@@DIDYOUSEETHAT172the problem is he couldn't have sued for more than he paid. He should have been awarded the whole $2700 though. I would best she sold it for about $9k.
She didn't have any receipts, if she did she would have been waving them like flags in her defense. Any post engagement dealings with that ring were done on the down low.
@@shendisackett You can sue for what every you want up to 5K. So yes he can sue for the full 5K. However, what the arbitrator awards is a whole other matter. I own my own condo, and I have two cases coming up. One for 5K against my strata for 8 months of an unresolved matter against another owner's tenant, which is the max allowed in that jurisdiction which is decided by an arbitrator, and one for 8K against the other owner in small claims in front of a judge, where the max is 35K. I am asking for one thousand per month. The strata told me I can't sue them both, I have to resolve the matter through arbitration only. Which is BS, I can sue both separately. There is nothing in strata bylaws saying I can't go outside to solve an issue. (I have already gotten the violator evicted, they are moving out the end of Dec 2024) Now I am seeking compensation for the last nine months. If you have an unresolved matter, and you are going to go to litigation learn the laws, don't depend on anyone else telling you what you can and can't do. And don't get your advice from a newspaper help column like this genius. Talk to a lawyer. I had two free consults with two real lawyer, one for each case. Both confirmed what I already learned, and both said I didn't need a lawyer as I have 8 months of video and audio evidence.
JJ is right. She claimed to have sold it for $7000 but also brags she got a $10,000 ring for $7700. So she probably sold it for $9000, gave $1000 to her boss who helped her find a buyer, and kept $3000. When JJ asked how much she sold it for, she wouldn't answer and JJ points this out, giving her time to come up with the figure of $7000.
The plaintiff should be so thankful for avoiding this train wreck of a marriage. The woman is totally all about herself and would be a nightmare to have married.
It's been quite a roller coaster ride, but I've grown and learned a lot about myself. The greatest thing is being able to interact with fans and touch people's lives... for that I give thanks
Wait she sell jewelry and has a business now selling jewelry, plus she says the ring was worth more? She sold that ring for more than 7 grand and probably was paying her rent with this guy’s money! Gold Digger! Guy you lost $700 bucks plus your interest and you got rid of her, you should feel lucky !
My fiance wanted to buy me an expensive wedding ring with a big flashy diamond. He wanted it for prestige, to make people think he's rich. I hate annoying jewelry that gets snagged or scratches things. I talked him into going to a pawn shop and getting a modest simple wedding band with a small recessed diamond. I absolutely love it! I never have to take it off because it's never "in the way."
She has a few things to learn, (and should have) prior to coming to court. An engagement ring is a promise to get married. If that promise is broken you don't get to keep the ring.
2:54 telltale sign of a liar! Judge Judy says, "I don't believe you gave your boss $1000 commission," and the defendant can't hide her guilty smile. She has to look away so she doesn't laugh...
2:45 Who the hell is Anne Landers? Never mind, Ann Landers was the pen name of an old advice column, written by two different women. A nurse Ruth Crowley, who had been writing a child-care column , then created the pseudonym Ann Landers to write the advice column. After she passed away the column was taken over by Esther Lederer, whom it seems this brain trust took advice from, as Esther Lederer was noted for giving incorrect legal advice concerning rings, and wedding gifts.
It's been quite a roller coaster ride, but I've grown and learned a lot about myself. The greatest thing is being able to interact with fans and touch people's lives... for that I give thanks
I don't think he should've gotten the full amount like some people are saying. She should have given the ring back, yes, but he took 5k from her and continued to date her, be intimate with her, go on trips with her for a year and a half, never saying anything about the ring in all that time. He waited until the relationship dissolved again to decide to sue for a ring that he knew she sold a long time ago. Yes she sold it for more than what he paid probably but if he didn't care then to ask for it, don't try to ask for it now that you're upset it still didn't work out for you.
Dude dodge the biggest bullet of his life. Had he made the mistake of marrying her he would have lost so much more. Her sense of entitlement was on full display and that's likely what turned him off after he proposed to her. She thought she'd hooked her fish and couldn't control herself enough to wait until the ink dried on the marriage license before she started acting entitled. Thank goodness this guy figured her out before he wasted a gargantuan sum on her party (aka wedding). YUCK!
"He spent $7700. So if you sold a ring he paid 100% of, why should you get any of that?" "(Her brain struggles to come up with an excuse...) Because heeee..... hurt me! He ended our relationship."
the entitlement to a ring that she barely had because the guy called it off is crazy! She definitely got big bucks for it if she was able to give him $5000 and her boss $1000. Probably made $20,000 on it.
It's been quite a roller coaster ride, but I've grown and learned a lot about myself. The greatest thing is being able to interact with fans and touch people's lives... for that I give thanks
I don't understand why anyone one would want to keep an Engagement Ring from a man they're not going to marry!?? If she was so eager to get rid of it because it upset her emotionally - especially when she couldn't even bear the thought that another woman would be wearing it (which they will now since she sold it!) you'd throw it away first! I would not keep a Ring from a man that no longer wanted to marry me - period! Women who do this gets us a bad name... I'm so glad that Judge Judy changed her mind about this. We are the first to moan when a man is unfair to us; why should it be okay the other way round...
Looked like the guy wanted to argue about the amount Judge Judy awarded him. Probably the other $700. Neither of them was a prize. They both definitely thought highly of themselves.
I don’t understand the logic here… jj keeps emphasizing on the fact that she sold the ring for less than what he paid but then turns around and awards him LESS money than what he paid. I don’t know jack ish about jewelry but am I wrong to think you’re not going to get the same value for something you paid that is now used?
The defendant had COVID and pneumonia in 2021. She spent time in the hospital including 4 days in the ICU. There is a current gofundme campaign for her because her health is poor.
I don't like this judgment. So here's the thing. She gave him $5000. He cashed the $5000. At no point did he say to her that $5000 wasn't good enough and he wanted more. And in fact, even after that he stayed with her for another year. If he wanted the $2700 then why didn't he say anything to her? Furthermore, let's say they were in court for the ring that he gave to her but she never gave him the $5000. Judge Judy is only allowed to give $5000. If the defendant hadn't given him the $5000 cheque, she would only owe him $5000 as per Judge Judy's rules. So why does she now have to pay more than what Judge Judy would be allowed to make a judgment for? If I were the defendant, I'd appeal this ruling. It's been more than 2 years, she's already paid him $5000, and it was a gift. You can't make a person pay for a gift because there's no mention of paying him back at any time. He doesn't get to change his mind 2 years later because things didn't work out.
I have only bought one engagement ring in my lifetime, which broke when I tried to remove the gumball. Took that as a sign and cancelled the wedding plans. 😇
@@theunconventionalnigerian Wrong, again. Finding a like-minded partner is all it takes. Too busy counting divorces of friends & family to be bothered with nuptials.
@@acousticshadow4032 whewww that’s a better (bc logic) response than “a fairy told me it was wrong bc the engagement ring was badly made”. cheers to a happy life for you and the people you care about. 🌼
"He hurt me" is not a legal defense. I have to say it's nice that she gave him $5.000 - she could've just kept and let him to take her to court - but really, she should've given him the ring back. But I'll be the first to say that I don't know how it works; does it matter who initiated the break-up? Is there any truth to what she said, that since he broke up with her, she could keep the ring?
Though I agree with JJ on the fact that he accepted payment with that $5K, whoever ends the relationship forfeits the ring. I’m sorry but he ended it she keeps it. If she would’ve ended it, it goes back to him. Whoever breaks the commitment should not get the ring imo 🤷🏻♀️
She should've given back the ring but a second hand ring isn't going to bring the same price as retail. That's simple knowledge. Judy is kinda slow on some subjects.. you can tell she only buys new Ave never bought second hand to save a buck lol. Plaintiff wasn't thinking about that money while lay down dancing either. Nothing worse than a man being petty
It's been quite a roller coaster ride, but I've grown and learned a lot about myself. The greatest thing is being able to interact with fans and touch people's lives... for that I give thanks
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Man dodged a bullet in the end!
I think she dodged a bullet. Imagine taking a woman that you broke up with twice to court for a ring that she already gave you more than what it was worth. I'd lose my mind.
She kept $1000 for her OWN RING. Everyone at that jewelry store screwed that poor guy.
Yep, by her logic when he purchased them a house she would have said "I did all the searching for the house and all he did is pay for it so it's really MY house and he should be happy that I offered to give him anything" Instead of saving him $1000 on the ring she wanted she instead pocketed a thousand dollars of his money. That's next level usury...
Or he screwed her over. Keep in mind that he broke up with her twice. Not once while he was with her after she sold the ring did he mention her paying the $2700. This was a bogus judgment.
@jessicaarmstrong5035 it's no different than when an employer gives yo a laptop to use.v it's not a gift to you. It's only for you use whist you are employed. If your boss suspends you then later decided to continue to employ you,. That laptop doesn't suddenly become Your property. It is only for your use whilst you are employed with that company. A ring is no different. It's for a prospective WIFE. IF YOU are no longer a wife, then the property provided ONLY for that reason goes back to it's legal owner. That ring is put on a specific finger of a specific person to signify to the world that that person is married and no longer on the open market. When that person returns to the open market after a marriage, then that property no longer retains any value since that person is no longer in a relationship with the property owner.
Why on earth would anyone want to retain product that's express purpose was to signal they were tied to the specific person who provided the signal of a specific relationship? An anniversary GIFT is just that, a gift. A ring is NOT a gift. It's a symbol of attachment to the person who requested a monogamous relationship. Ending the relationship ends the purpose of the ring since you are no longer part of the relationship it's ONLY purpose was to signify.
She sold that ring for more than they paid for it because she got a great deal. She worked in that business, and that ring was worth way more than 7,700.
Yes it was worth $10,000 as they said, a standard discount for people working in the jewellery business is 30%. So she would likely have sold it for at least $9000. She should have just returned the ring, although she is correct he wouldn't have been able to get more than $4000 for it if he sold it back to a store.
@@cdelane3335 “I appreciate your kindness and generosity. You're a true fan and friend.”where are you from?
Incorrect. She sold the ring for $7000 and he bought it for $7700. She sold it at a loss.
@@shendisackett No she specifically said here that she got $7000 for it, not $10K or $9000. And yes she's right that he wouldn't have been able to get more than $4000 for it. You can't get brand new pricing for a ring that you used. She wore the ring and thus it was a used ring. Even if it was worth $10K the most he would've gotten was $3333, about 1/3 of the price. Her giving him $5000 was more than fair. I can't believe JJ did this. The defendant should appeal.
When your defense to Judge Judy is to cite Ann Landers you better head for the exits.
IKR, Miss Manners would be a much better choice to quote from!😂
She was popular and she’s talking about etiquette. It’s not the law to return the ring. It is the right thing to do.😊
Part 1: He’s petty
Part 2: She’s a gold-digger
Part 3: He should thank his stars ✨
😂
He spent a lot of money on her. Hardly petty
I don't think she's a gold digger. I do think she's being petty... I'm ok with that. He broke it off, she didn't do anything deceitful. And I do agree with Ann Landers and she should keep the ring. #Petty4TheWin
The defendant has the arrogance to start quoting the law to Judge Judy. She should have given him back the ring and said Goodbye. He had a lucky escape from the defendant in my opinion !
The law as interpreted by the legal mind of Ann Landers, Esq. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
kk ... !
Imagine if they had gotten married and wanted to get a divorce. She would have taken him to the cleaners
AGREE.
She could not give the ring back, she sold the ring. You did not pay attention to the case. Get your listening ears on, dude.
As I thought, she had all kinds of excuses, ranging from giving a kickback to what he'd get if he sold it on consignment to her time and effort getting the ring.
But the one I absolutely believe was the primary motive was when she claimed "he hurt her" by calling off the engagement.
It's not a legal defense.
I think looking back at this, both parties will agree that not getting married was one of the best decisions of their lives.
"I set his house on fire but shouldn't go to jail because he hurt me!!! I'm a woman and when I'm sad, everyone should sympathize."
Engagement ring, wedding ring, and then suffer/ring. (HA!!)
This is why I never got married. I'm much happier just being in a long-term relationship with my boyfriend. No fuss no muss.
The guy spared himself of a lot of trouble by ending the relationship. Congratulations buddy.
I think she's better off not being with him. He broke up with her twice. That's a dick move.
I think he should have gotten $2700. Her being in the jewelry business I’m sure she got every bit of the $7700, probably more.
I agree.
I agree he should have got the full amount. The usual discount for people working in the jewellery business is 30% which tracks as the ring was valued at $10,000. I think she probably managed to get around $9k for it, if she's a good saleswoman. She is right though that if he had sold the ring to a jewellery store he would be lucky to get $4k, and it would probably be less. He should have been given the full purchase price back though. It seems she then did steal all her boss' contacts to open her own store!
True. However, he was about to get nothing. Aah-zip.
As soon as he opened his mouth on hearing the verdict, I said, "Don't Speak! Just take the money."
She's a lιar, if the ring is insured for 10k, then it is worth 10k. JJ can only go by what she said she sold it for, which is 7k, but we all know she's a lιar
Trust me, insurance appraisals are invariably inflated. "Hey, Bubba ~ what time is 'lights-out' on this cell block?"
Omg that defendant looks like a character from any 90s movie
“He hurt me”
2:16 🙄 groan!
THAT’S why, right there - a scorned woman, therefore he owes her the world
He hurted or hurts, but never hurt.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂@@gerrymarko5893
Phee-mail logic
I think she got more than 7k when she sold it 🤔
Yeah, her boss probably sold it for $10,000 and she gave him $1000 and kept $4000 profit. JJ should have given him $2700 to return the full value but she just thinks the entire sell should go to him, in this case the $2000 she claims to have pocketed. She probably pocketed $2000 more.
She’s gorgeous
Skin deep
Superficiality doesn’t go the full hog. Makeup is a woman’s best friend. Under all that, she’s nasty!!
It’s clear she knows it and takes full advantage of it.
Defendant comes across as someone who would wait outside your house on a cold moonless night with a weapon...
This guy dodged a massive bullet.
The woman just said there is a 66.6% mark up on the jewelry and she, as somebody that is in the business, charged her soon to be husband full retail price for the ring. Somebody made a lot of money on that ring.
woof she is so scary ! guy lucked out
Uh huh.
You know nothing about him.
So you know the guy?@ASmith-jn7kf
@ASmith-jn7kf and you do?
Why wouldn't Judge Judy have asked her for a bill of sale? If she didn't have it or couldn't provide receipts then she should have given the plaintiff the full appraised amount.
I thinks he hadn't quite figured things out back then. Now, all the viewers like us know exactly what should have been done in her ruling her judgment.
Looks like he dodged a big bullet.
0:26 This woman is so full of SHHHHHH!! Judy should make her cough up the receipt for the sale, she got it at a great price through her connection, so she sold it for a lot more than 7K, she probably sold it for 9 or 10 K. I don't know why Judy is taking her at her word?
I think the award limit in her court is $5,000 so it might not have mattered anyway.
@@Sherwoody Yes her limit is 5K, however he already received a 5K cheque, so she could still award him another 5K, in the end Judy didn't believe her, but did not ask for proof of the sale.
@@DIDYOUSEETHAT172the problem is he couldn't have sued for more than he paid. He should have been awarded the whole $2700 though. I would best she sold it for about $9k.
She didn't have any receipts, if she did she would have been waving them like flags in her defense. Any post engagement dealings with that ring were done on the down low.
@@shendisackett You can sue for what every you want up to 5K. So yes he can sue for the full 5K. However, what the arbitrator awards is a whole other matter. I own my own condo, and I have two cases coming up. One for 5K against my strata for 8 months of an unresolved matter against another owner's tenant, which is the max allowed in that jurisdiction which is decided by an arbitrator, and one for 8K against the other owner in small claims in front of a judge, where the max is 35K. I am asking for one thousand per month. The strata told me I can't sue them both, I have to resolve the matter through arbitration only. Which is BS, I can sue both separately. There is nothing in strata bylaws saying I can't go outside to solve an issue. (I have already gotten the violator evicted, they are moving out the end of Dec 2024) Now I am seeking compensation for the last nine months. If you have an unresolved matter, and you are going to go to litigation learn the laws, don't depend on anyone else telling you what you can and can't do. And don't get your advice from a newspaper help column like this genius. Talk to a lawyer. I had two free consults with two real lawyer, one for each case. Both confirmed what I already learned, and both said I didn't need a lawyer as I have 8 months of video and audio evidence.
JJ is right. She claimed to have sold it for $7000 but also brags she got a $10,000 ring for $7700. So she probably sold it for $9000, gave $1000 to her boss who helped her find a buyer, and kept $3000. When JJ asked how much she sold it for, she wouldn't answer and JJ points this out, giving her time to come up with the figure of $7000.
The plaintiff should be so thankful for avoiding this train wreck of a marriage. The woman is totally all about herself and would be a nightmare to have married.
It's been quite a roller coaster ride, but I've grown and learned a lot about myself. The greatest thing is being able to interact with fans and touch people's lives... for that I give thanks
As that guy in Seinfeld said, "Ann Landers sucks"
She shouldn’t profit off of him or the break up of their relationship. She hold have returned the ring and been one with it.
She's a moocher. When she wasn't getting her way, she tried to do a hair flip to feign innocence.
She's cute..
Wait she sell jewelry and has a business now selling jewelry, plus she says the ring was worth more? She sold that ring for more than 7 grand and probably was paying her rent with this guy’s money!
Gold Digger! Guy you lost $700 bucks plus your interest and you got rid of her, you should feel lucky !
My fiance wanted to buy me an expensive wedding ring with a big flashy diamond. He wanted it for prestige, to make people think he's rich. I hate annoying jewelry that gets snagged or scratches things. I talked him into going to a pawn shop and getting a modest simple wedding band with a small recessed diamond. I absolutely love it! I never have to take it off because it's never "in the way."
"Why should he be out the money?"
"Because he hurt me." 😂
Sweetpea, it's time to grow up and move on.
She has a few things to learn, (and should have) prior to coming to court. An engagement ring is a promise to get married. If that promise is broken you don't get to keep the ring.
2:54 telltale sign of a liar! Judge Judy says, "I don't believe you gave your boss $1000 commission," and the defendant can't hide her guilty smile. She has to look away so she doesn't laugh...
2:45 Who the hell is Anne Landers? Never mind, Ann Landers was the pen name of an old advice column, written by two different women. A nurse Ruth Crowley, who had been writing a child-care column , then created the pseudonym Ann Landers to write the advice column. After she passed away the column was taken over by Esther Lederer, whom it seems this brain trust took advice from, as Esther Lederer was noted for giving incorrect legal advice concerning rings, and wedding gifts.
Like a "Dear Abby" columnist.
I was just thinking this too 😂
If she really doesn’t want anyone else to ever wear it have it melted down. Lol
I thought she deserved it because she gave the ring to him, 2:28 hit me hard lol
It's been quite a roller coaster ride, but I've grown and learned a lot about myself. The greatest thing is being able to interact with fans and touch people's lives... for that I give thanks
@@KeanuCharlesreeves1015 sounds awesome, I'm happy for ya :)
@ “I appreciate your kindness and generosity. You're a true fan and friend.”where are you from?
Ann Landers ??? LMAO
He dodged a bullet.
2:19 oh grow up
I'm sure she is old now, but did she change? We will never know.
"Show me on the engagement ring where the bad man hurt you"
It depends on a state. CA so far is the only one that she is able to keep the ring
I’m not sure if she’s legally entitled to keep it, but morally returning it to him is the right thing to do. Making profit off of it is doubly scummy.
I don't think he should've gotten the full amount like some people are saying. She should have given the ring back, yes, but he took 5k from her and continued to date her, be intimate with her, go on trips with her for a year and a half, never saying anything about the ring in all that time. He waited until the relationship dissolved again to decide to sue for a ring that he knew she sold a long time ago. Yes she sold it for more than what he paid probably but if he didn't care then to ask for it, don't try to ask for it now that you're upset it still didn't work out for you.
£2700😮
Who Should Keep the Engagement Ring?
Dude dodge the biggest bullet of his life. Had he made the mistake of marrying her he would have lost so much more. Her sense of entitlement was on full display and that's likely what turned him off after he proposed to her. She thought she'd hooked her fish and couldn't control herself enough to wait until the ink dried on the marriage license before she started acting entitled. Thank goodness this guy figured her out before he wasted a gargantuan sum on her party (aka wedding). YUCK!
Yea it’s funny when guys think with the wrong head
I MET THIS GIRL NAMED JUDY AT THE CAFE ROUND MY WAY
What I don't understand is why he proposed to her just to end it, not even a few months later. Weird.
Because she's a nasty, attitude-having bleeder. Next question.
Don't flatter her with kind words and compliments, Judge Judy. That greedy thing will get worse.
"He spent $7700. So if you sold a ring he paid 100% of, why should you get any of that?"
"(Her brain struggles to come up with an excuse...) Because heeee..... hurt me! He ended our relationship."
She's in the engagement business 😊 💍
the entitlement to a ring that she barely had because the guy called it off is crazy! She definitely got big bucks for it if she was able to give him $5000 and her boss $1000. Probably made $20,000 on it.
It's been quite a roller coaster ride, but I've grown and learned a lot about myself. The greatest thing is being able to interact with fans and touch people's lives... for that I give thanks
Plaintiff shoulda got the whole $2,700!
I don't understand why anyone one would want to keep an Engagement Ring from a man they're not going to marry!?? If she was so eager to get rid of it because it upset her emotionally - especially when she couldn't even bear the thought that another woman would be wearing it (which they will now since she sold it!) you'd throw it away first! I would not keep a Ring from a man that no longer wanted to marry me - period! Women who do this gets us a bad name... I'm so glad that Judge Judy changed her mind about this. We are the first to moan when a man is unfair to us; why should it be okay the other way round...
Looked like the guy wanted to argue about the amount Judge Judy awarded him. Probably the other $700. Neither of them was a prize. They both definitely thought highly of themselves.
I don’t understand the logic here… jj keeps emphasizing on the fact that she sold the ring for less than what he paid but then turns around and awards him LESS money than what he paid.
I don’t know jack ish about jewelry but am I wrong to think you’re not going to get the same value for something you paid that is now used?
The plaintiff still lost $700.
An engagement ring is not a gift, lol. I think someone in the jewellery business would sell a 10k ring for 10k not 7,7k.
The audience said something between the lines of 😒 and 😮💨
Gold digger. Good riddance.
Judge Judy was wrong on this one she should have demanded receipts.
Why didn't he get $2700?
The defendant had COVID and pneumonia in 2021. She spent time in the hospital including 4 days in the ICU. There is a current gofundme campaign for her because her health is poor.
She probably didn't believe COVID would dare to infect her.
@ hehehehehe!
Woman is a liar. Glad. He is rid of her. Should get all his money back. Men if you see this woman. Run.
Defendant looks like the type of woman you might see on Forensic Files, accused of murdering her third husband but claiming she's innocent.
I don't like this judgment. So here's the thing. She gave him $5000. He cashed the $5000. At no point did he say to her that $5000 wasn't good enough and he wanted more. And in fact, even after that he stayed with her for another year. If he wanted the $2700 then why didn't he say anything to her? Furthermore, let's say they were in court for the ring that he gave to her but she never gave him the $5000. Judge Judy is only allowed to give $5000. If the defendant hadn't given him the $5000 cheque, she would only owe him $5000 as per Judge Judy's rules. So why does she now have to pay more than what Judge Judy would be allowed to make a judgment for? If I were the defendant, I'd appeal this ruling. It's been more than 2 years, she's already paid him $5000, and it was a gift. You can't make a person pay for a gift because there's no mention of paying him back at any time. He doesn't get to change his mind 2 years later because things didn't work out.
If anyone would get played for any breakup hill there would be alot of rich ppl out there
I have only bought one engagement ring in my lifetime, which broke when I tried to remove the gumball. Took that as a sign and cancelled the wedding plans. 😇
how tragic for you.
@@theunconventionalnigerian Wrong, again. Finding a like-minded partner is all it takes. Too busy counting divorces of friends & family to be bothered with nuptials.
@@acousticshadow4032 whewww that’s a better (bc logic) response than “a fairy told me it was wrong bc the engagement ring was badly made”.
cheers to a happy life for you and the people you care about. 🌼
I wonder how many people have regretted marrying her since 1994
Let's go to the Ann Landers Memorial Scoreboard!
"He hurt me" is not a legal defense. I have to say it's nice that she gave him $5.000 - she could've just kept and let him to take her to court - but really, she should've given him the ring back. But I'll be the first to say that I don't know how it works; does it matter who initiated the break-up? Is there any truth to what she said, that since he broke up with her, she could keep the ring?
no, that's bullshit. Engagement off, he gets the ring back. Should be common knowledge by now.
She's a gold digger and tried to even swindle JJ. 🤨
AVP 👽
....I am ... motioning to requetion / the interaganets /..... Give me a second /.
Stop spoiling your kids!!
I find them both offensive 🎉
Though I agree with JJ on the fact that he accepted payment with that $5K, whoever ends the relationship forfeits the ring. I’m sorry but he ended it she keeps it. If she would’ve ended it, it goes back to him. Whoever breaks the commitment should not get the ring imo 🤷🏻♀️
‘imo’ is not a legal term.
@ I’m not an atty so 🤔 I didn’t realize the comment section was solely for legal purposes 😄
Gold Digger
Is this king Solomon's judgment?. Judge Judy is as close as they come.
She should've given back the ring but a second hand ring isn't going to bring the same price as retail. That's simple knowledge. Judy is kinda slow on some subjects.. you can tell she only buys new Ave never bought second hand to save a buck lol. Plaintiff wasn't thinking about that money while lay down dancing either. Nothing worse than a man being petty
@1814motion - lay down dancing... Best description I've ever heard😂😂😂
I SAID FIRST!!!!!!!
firrrrrrst
Hopefully, since this, she's been in many relationships where she's "fallen on a doorknob" more than once.
And Judge Judy screws him over with the 2000.00 award 😮
She’s expects him to pay for business contacts?
Ann Landers. Hint from elouse. Dear Abbey, I miss that stuff from the newspaper 🗞️
It's been quite a roller coaster ride, but I've grown and learned a lot about myself. The greatest thing is being able to interact with fans and touch people's lives... for that I give thanks