He needed to interrupt because they all rambled on with completely useless information that didn't answer the question. It's a very common problem in Thailand to make simple things extremely complicated for no reason. The reporter has a responsibility to keep conversations simple and clear so the viewers are not bored with unnecessary bla bla bla. Most questions are best answered with fewer words, about 5 seconds. No one likes to listen to people who ramble on about nothing.
Yes,it is absolutely and the biggest problem of this country is the article number 112.Also 9 people of constitution court destroyed the party that most people voted and it is not the first time, it is shameful!
They pretended to be democratic since the first King of Thailand. So long as the country maintains the monarchy, there will be no democracy and no real freedom.
@@kensanders0088U.S. Supreme Court is appointed by the elected president. Thai constitutional court is appointed via secret ballots internal to the judiciary. Apples and Oranges. I’d encourage you to educate yourself.
Totally agree. He cut off the speakers while they were in the middle of interesting points and very loudly at that. Old style journalism and very, very annoying.
Yes very true. But this is not recognised as it wasnt in Thailand. Its a very odd place or so I feel after 18 years here. Stinks of corruption in every corner.
Srettha was ordered by Thaksin to appoint Pichet to the cabinet, despite his criminal background, and both knew there were risks involved. There was no benefit, since Pichet has no experience of value to the cabinet or the people. Thaksin just wanted to reward him for taking the hit and going to prison for attempting to bribe Supreme Court judges on behalf of Thaksin in one of his criminal cases. Srettha was too weak to refuse this absurd demand from Thaksin, as he was just a nominee without political support who got the job due to his “friendship” with Thaksin’s sister, Yingluck. So Srettha and Thaksin got what they deserved in this case. But the treatment of MFP party and disregarding the votes of 14 million is another matter.
Yes, while this information was very well presented and explained, there was a lot of tip-toeing around Thaksin's direct involvement and complicity in all this. And the news that followed was that Thaksin, not a politician, a convicted criminal who spent only a few months of an 8-year sentence in a hospital wearning a phoney neckbrace, has "ordered" the digital wallet scheme, that was the party's primary campaign platform, to be scrapped.
all planned events from before Taksin's medical arrival.... this was to allow time for the courts to complete the process of removing the peoples elected Move Forward Party and then open the doors for Taksin's daughter to become leader of the appointed political party to parliament.
It’s essential to look at the broader picture here. The appointment of individuals like Pichet, while controversial, cannot be solely attributed to Thaksin’s influence over Srettha. Every political leader must make difficult decisions, and it's often a balancing act to maintain stability within the party and the government. Dismissing Pichet outright disregards the potential value he could bring, regardless of his past. The idea that Srettha is merely a puppet of Thaksin is a reductionist view that doesn't consider the complex political dynamics at play. Furthermore, Srettha’s relationship with Yingluck should not automatically be seen as a weakness but rather as a testament to his ability to form strategic alliances. Regarding the Move Forward Party (MFP) and the 14 million votes, it's critical to recognize that the political system in Thailand, like in many democracies, involves more than just popular vote; it also requires coalition-building and navigating legal frameworks. While the treatment of the MFP raises legitimate concerns about democratic principles, it is a separate issue from the appointment of cabinet members and should be addressed on its own merits. Simplifying these complex issues into narratives of control and weakness overlooks the intricate realities of governance and politics.
Are you just comment from Conspiracy Theory? Prove please. He was became to be PM through the Parlament system and has been voted by mo who selected from Thai population it’s not just Tamsin order. In addition He was one of a success in business person . do you think he will be stupid letting someone control him ? Could you run the business and success like him ? Talk nonsense you are .
The new PM, Thaksin’s daughter, did go to university with that panelist but there was a scandal involving her admission. Thaksin as PM reportedly ordered the permanent secretary for education to get hold of the university entrance exam papers in advance to ease her in. There was a backlash from parents of kids that failed to get in and she had to shift to a faculty where placed not in demand but quietly switched back again later.
I would have thought that was pretty standard practice amongst elites and top tier universities, as evidenced by the recent Ivy League admissions scandal in the US.
After 13 successful and 9 unsuccessful coups in just over a century, as well as 20+ constitutions and national charters, Thailand has more or less perfected the art of the bloodless coup and instituted a tri-partate political revolving door, allowing each of the main political factions to have a turn with their noses in the feedbag, as long as they don't attempt to upset the political balance. Blessings upon the Thai people.
Thailand has been in peaceful state for long time and royal family has never insulted or harm his citizens not that I know of since I was born. Besides that, royal family has extended his support for his people all along so I disagree of any revising law relating to royal grace. The opposition has lifted the majestic law to overthrow the throne.
Have you been living in a cave? Thailand has been in political chaos since the military perpetrated a coup in 2006. The whole world knows this. Complete mess for nearly 20 years.
Thank you for the TRUTH. I am a Faring living in Thailand 🇹🇭 now starting to get anxious about my future as Thai democracy unfolds. I have said many times that Thai products are very good quality and to be exported world wide. Nobody wants to give me an answer. Now my eyes are being opened. Open this Country please and get the economy where it belongs on the International scene. Wayne M. 🇨🇦
Is sword cutting edge situation, there no true democracy only which is more favourable. They wanted to secure their business and relation with China, so is obvious they went more controlling and military dominance.
Thumb's down to the news journalist that anchor this programme. Why keep interrupting? What he trying to prove or he just wants to hear what he wants???👎👎👎
Ahhh..here come the so call expert who didn't know anything about Thai people and their way of doing things. Let me add to those claim one thing and one thing only. It's money, as long as those guy guarantee the Thais can do their business and those guys can do anything they want just like any leader around the world. It's just that.period. Look at Bangladesh, they burnt everything because job quota's. That should prove my point.
I would call that stupidity on behalf of Thai people. We, I mean some of us allow it to happen because we're not patient enough to let the government do their works as they're appointed to. Some were fool by politicians from the opposition to stage protests which escalated to military coup. And don't get me started on the military - drafted constitution that passed the referendum, which many Thai people claimed they were fooled to voted for it, but not me.
The panelists did a very good job of giving relatively simple explanations about a very comlicated situation, however the square-headed elephant in the room, Thaksin, was not fully indicated for his complicity in all of this. A caption mentioned he was sentenced to 8 years in prison, but didn't mention that only served a few months of that, in a hospital, making trips in public wearing a neckbrace only the remove it once he thought there weren't any cameras around. The Minister in question was guilty of bribing the courts during Thaksin's trial, Thaksin met with Prime Minister Srettha immediately before he was given that position, and as soon as Srettha was removed from office, Thaksin, a convicted criminal, not a politician, "ordered" the party's primary campaign platform, a digital wallet scheme to provide a monetary bonus to Thai citizens, be cancelled.
The three invited speakers seem not neutral on their comments. It seemes that they favored PueThai party and their comments did not root the past problems enough but only crititized what they felt about it.
Yeah man..they need stability more than anything now..Vietnam are moving forward while Malaysia politics are very stable now but Thailand keep drowning in this circles.
It’s an absolute turmoils for politicians with unethical conducts but a bright path to participatory democracy. A single individual filed a complaint against a giant political party. Soon unethical corporates. Watch out!! Being elected is not an excuse for misconduct. Rules of Laws applies equally
lots of critics of the interviewer. I do not agree. he creates the direction of the discussion and he did that fairly allowing for many good points to be made. It was enlightening discussion on the state of politics after an earthquake of developments. I'm not an outsider, Thailand has been my home long time.
Let's have another interviewer. This guy either trying to show he knows much. Cut off the guest from London who was trying to explain something important. very rude. What has lese majeste law got to do with current situation? No one insulted the King Any party that wants to try will be dissolved based on recent reality
Les mag as sty Is a out not being able to talk badly about there king. If ant body dose in thailand the police will come for you 100%. So thia people do not talk openly about him.
Politician tend to engage their policy with the sensitive issue and use the lèse-majesté law as a tool to suppress dissent or weaken political opponents. In everyday life, it's generally expected that people should treat each other with respect, and laws exist to protect individuals from defamation and insult. And I think that the concept behind lèse-majesté laws in Thailand extends this protection to the monarchy but with much greater severity due to the unique cultural and historical significance of the royal family in Thai society. The idea is that, just as one would avoid insulting a neighbor out of common decency and fear of legal repercussions, one should especially avoid insulting the monarchy, given its revered status and the severe penalties involved.
I need a full-hour program of this panel. Let them finish talking please. I partly disagree with Veerapat on the adaptation of Phue Thai Party. He said they realised that they can't be liberal all the time for them to survive. 1. They've never been that liberal. Yes they had some progressive policies. But they've never been anti-establishment. The reason they're sacked in the past was because they gained too much popularity. And they wanted to control the establishment themselves. 2.There is no guarantee that after they 'adapt' this time around, they'd survive. It's partly because of the existence of the Move Forward Party that allows the Phue Thai to take the office. The established elites need someone to fight against the rising MFP. The old-friend conservatives can't do this alone so they need Phue Thai on their side. You'll never know if the MFP isn't this popular, the Shinawatra might still be the all-time evil for the elites.
I’m Thai and there was no surprises for me. The show has been written from the beginning of Srettha’s term. Things will get better, depending on the intelligence of Thai people. And yes, keep disrupting the speakers is very annoying.
Yes I agree, I found the speakers very informative but the news reporter was rude and annoying, cutting them off. I live in Thailand and am trying to fathom Thai politics which is very difficult. I don't understand now where once the military and Thaksin were waring and now they are acting together?
predictable ,they always win here in the end ,who appoints the judges in this constitutional court but as they say ,a country gets the government they deserve and it's not my battle 23 years here and local politics is what really counts with these folk in my village
At the core of the issue is the vying for political supremacy between the Yellow Shirt and the Red Shirt factions in the name of for the betterment of the country. In reality, it's a joke. Investor confidence is shaken. The people are divided. The country is weakened in the long run.
That doesn't bode well. No more military, let them stay in the background. The people were really getting angry with the military when they were in power.
@@nicolelouis8968 No matter how interesting they were, they aren't answer his question. I'm Thais so I can answer most of the questions myself. That made me a bit irritate on how they beat around a bush and did not directly answer the question. For example the anchor ask what is lese majeste for some audience that unfamiliar with this term and the answer is Siam political history since 191x, that's not a proper answer. They can just say that it's a law similar to blasphemous towards king.
We haven’t had one in while. I think the old general and army are still the country.i think the one that was elected by the people would have been good for Thai people. But the army wouldn’t let it be
Al Jazeera's moderator/ Journalist should stop interrupting the speaker. Let them first finish & then add to his question.
He needed to interrupt because they all rambled on with completely useless information that didn't answer the question.
It's a very common problem in Thailand to make simple things extremely complicated for no reason.
The reporter has a responsibility to keep conversations simple and clear so the viewers are not bored with unnecessary bla bla bla.
Most questions are best answered with fewer words, about 5 seconds.
No one likes to listen to people who ramble on about nothing.
I agree with you this moderator comes across as a steamroller he is lacking in social etiquette. All three guests were very interesting to listen to
Or do so politely
This happens everywhere in all countries. The media are there to get the facts, not listen to political jargon.
@@cruisingthethaiway6881 They are cunning people. Most are good at stupidity, it is a waste of time.
Yes,it is absolutely and the biggest problem of this country is the article number 112.Also 9 people of constitution court destroyed the party that most people voted and it is not the first time, it is shameful!
Since when was Thailand ever a democracy?
It is democracy more than america.
@@tgerilc2200That’s ridiculous.
Back to school for you Beavis.
They pretended to be democratic since the first King of Thailand. So long as the country maintains the monarchy, there will be no democracy and no real freedom.
@@boranbkk4270US is only slightly ahead, because the Supreme Court hasn’t thrown out a president yet…
A disgrace what is happening in Thailand politics!. That unelected officials have such power to overrule the will of the people!
Hmmm , unelected sounds like Supreme Court court of USA
@@kensanders0088U.S. Supreme Court is appointed by the elected president.
Thai constitutional court is appointed via secret ballots internal to the judiciary.
Apples and Oranges. I’d encourage you to educate yourself.
Sounds like Kamala.
@@davidb2206how?
Host/moderator fails in his job by cutting off the speakers sporadically. Sadly.
This news reporter needs to shut up and let them speak
TOTALLY AGREE WHAT AN ANNOYING ENGLISHMAN
Time is limited on a news program. This should be a 3-hour panel.
Totally agree. He cut off the speakers while they were in the middle of interesting points and very loudly at that. Old style journalism and very, very annoying.
There are many ways to stage a coup. The most clever one is using the Constitutional Court so most people might believe there was due process of law.
Prayut had a convicted heroin trafficker. Who in fact did lengthy jail time in Australia
Yes very true. But this is not recognised as it wasnt in Thailand. Its a very odd place or so I feel after 18 years here. Stinks of corruption in every corner.
It's powder!
...
...
...
...
That's what he said.
The one with a nick name is " powder "
Thai law and constitution means nothing. They learn it from the West USA.
Wrong person!!
This was a coup
just an opinion tho. i may be wrong
Srettha was ordered by Thaksin to appoint Pichet to the cabinet, despite his criminal background, and both knew there were risks involved. There was no benefit, since Pichet has no experience of value to the cabinet or the people. Thaksin just wanted to reward him for taking the hit and going to prison for attempting to bribe Supreme Court judges on behalf of Thaksin in one of his criminal cases. Srettha was too weak to refuse this absurd demand from Thaksin, as he was just a nominee without political support who got the job due to his “friendship” with Thaksin’s sister, Yingluck. So Srettha and Thaksin got what they deserved in this case. But the treatment of MFP party and disregarding the votes of 14 million is another matter.
Yes, while this information was very well presented and explained, there was a lot of tip-toeing around Thaksin's direct involvement and complicity in all this. And the news that followed was that Thaksin, not a politician, a convicted criminal who spent only a few months of an 8-year sentence in a hospital wearning a phoney neckbrace, has "ordered" the digital wallet scheme, that was the party's primary campaign platform, to be scrapped.
all planned events from before Taksin's medical arrival.... this was to allow time for the courts to complete the process of removing the peoples elected Move Forward Party and then open the doors for Taksin's daughter to become leader of the appointed political party to parliament.
It’s essential to look at the broader picture here. The appointment of individuals like Pichet, while controversial, cannot be solely attributed to Thaksin’s influence over Srettha. Every political leader must make difficult decisions, and it's often a balancing act to maintain stability within the party and the government. Dismissing Pichet outright disregards the potential value he could bring, regardless of his past. The idea that Srettha is merely a puppet of Thaksin is a reductionist view that doesn't consider the complex political dynamics at play. Furthermore, Srettha’s relationship with Yingluck should not automatically be seen as a weakness but rather as a testament to his ability to form strategic alliances.
Regarding the Move Forward Party (MFP) and the 14 million votes, it's critical to recognize that the political system in Thailand, like in many democracies, involves more than just popular vote; it also requires coalition-building and navigating legal frameworks. While the treatment of the MFP raises legitimate concerns about democratic principles, it is a separate issue from the appointment of cabinet members and should be addressed on its own merits. Simplifying these complex issues into narratives of control and weakness overlooks the intricate realities of governance and politics.
Are you just comment from Conspiracy Theory? Prove please. He was became to be PM through the Parlament system and has been voted by mo who selected from Thai population it’s not just Tamsin order. In addition He was one of a success in business person . do you think he will be stupid letting someone control him ? Could you run the business and success like him ? Talk nonsense you are .
@@theanonymous1857who’s talking nonsense???
Why didn't you ask who nominates the members of the Constitutional Court?
Moderator should stop and let the speaker finish their comment. Come on
Actually why keep cutting off the speaker? It’s kinda of rude
Let the speaker speak!! Your rude interruptions are not helping to clarify the issues!!
The new PM, Thaksin’s daughter, did go to university with that panelist but there was a scandal involving her admission. Thaksin as PM reportedly ordered the permanent secretary for education to get hold of the university entrance exam papers in advance to ease her in. There was a backlash from parents of kids that failed to get in and she had to shift to a faculty where placed not in demand but quietly switched back again later.
Whoa, where did you get this inside scoop, man?
I would have thought that was pretty standard practice amongst elites and top tier universities, as evidenced by the recent Ivy League admissions scandal in the US.
After 13 successful and 9 unsuccessful coups in just over a century, as well as 20+ constitutions and national charters, Thailand has more or less perfected the art of the bloodless coup and instituted a tri-partate political revolving door, allowing each of the main political factions to have a turn with their noses in the feedbag, as long as they don't attempt to upset the political balance. Blessings upon the Thai people.
The interviewer is awful….he needs to stop interrupting the speakers ….content from guests is excellent
Agree with you 100 percent
100%. Awful news reporter and way too loud and dominating.
There's no democracy here, at least call it out for what it is if you're practicing journalism
That host is so annoying when he butts in with his stuttering. Learn to speak clearly!
This news reporter is very rude, keep interrupting the invited speakers!
Thailand has been in peaceful state for long time and royal family has never insulted or harm his citizens not that I know of since I was born. Besides that, royal family has extended his support for his people all along so I disagree of any revising law relating to royal grace. The opposition has lifted the majestic law to overthrow the throne.
Have you been living in a cave? Thailand has been in political chaos since the military perpetrated a coup in 2006. The whole world knows this. Complete mess for nearly 20 years.
i don't want to watch this channel anymore. why they always interrupt speak. bye
They are translating to you
Glad some network is reporting this honestly 👏
Thank you for the TRUTH. I am a Faring living in Thailand 🇹🇭 now starting to get anxious about my future as Thai democracy unfolds. I have said many times that Thai products are very good quality and to be exported world wide. Nobody wants to give me an answer. Now my eyes are being opened. Open this Country please and get the economy where it belongs on the International scene. Wayne M. 🇨🇦
Is sword cutting edge situation, there no true democracy only which is more favourable.
They wanted to secure their business and relation with China, so is obvious they went more controlling and military dominance.
Thumb's down to the news journalist that anchor this programme. Why keep interrupting? What he trying to prove or he just wants to hear what he wants???👎👎👎
WORST HOST EVER
As a native to the country, I feel embarrassed as the democracy is fragile for decades and just turmoil after turmoil
Amazing that the Thai people just let this happen every time
Too busy eating or playing Candy Crush on their phones
Ahhh..here come the so call expert who didn't know anything about Thai people and their way of doing things.
Let me add to those claim one thing and one thing only.
It's money, as long as those guy guarantee the Thais can do their business and those guys can do anything they want just like any leader around the world. It's just that.period.
Look at Bangladesh, they burnt everything because job quota's.
That should prove my point.
@@brianbrown9512Lol so true. 😂
I would call that stupidity on behalf of Thai people. We, I mean some of us allow it to happen because we're not patient enough to let the government do their works as they're appointed to. Some were fool by politicians from the opposition to stage protests which escalated to military coup. And don't get me started on the military - drafted constitution that passed the referendum, which many Thai people claimed they were fooled to voted for it, but not me.
@@brianbrown9512haha well, candy crush gets me through depression after seeing what's happening in my country. 😢😢
The panelists did a very good job of giving relatively simple explanations about a very comlicated situation, however the square-headed elephant in the room, Thaksin, was not fully indicated for his complicity in all of this. A caption mentioned he was sentenced to 8 years in prison, but didn't mention that only served a few months of that, in a hospital, making trips in public wearing a neckbrace only the remove it once he thought there weren't any cameras around. The Minister in question was guilty of bribing the courts during Thaksin's trial, Thaksin met with Prime Minister Srettha immediately before he was given that position, and as soon as Srettha was removed from office, Thaksin, a convicted criminal, not a politician, "ordered" the party's primary campaign platform, a digital wallet scheme to provide a monetary bonus to Thai citizens, be cancelled.
I agree.. Thailand is no longer a Democratic country 😊.
Amazing panel! Learnt a lot from their responses
It is a very interesting discussion but I switch off because I could not stand the moderator. Sorry Al Jazeera.
James interrupts to much. Bit rude.
We don’t have free speech in England, you need to check your facts.
I wouldn't dare speak badly of King Charles, his creepy face and sausage fingers would haunt my dreams.
Who’s the BIGGY pulling the ‘string?’
The top 1% of the wealthy
Army
No I know but I won’t say I live here Hint it’s a big money family thing
@@jduncan48 That's still 700k people. Still way too democratic.. More like 7 people
Elvis!!??
Does Quatar allows its citizen to speak against the royals out in the public.. I'm just curious
Well as a Qatari, no
@@ShineBroWallah I see, thanks 👍
@@rudiesan_89 no problem
Such a rude reporter, made the whole news presentation very annoying to watch or listen
Where is democracy in Thailand???
It's already dead for a thousand years.
Democracy in Thailand got 2 places are Pattaya and Phuket.
This was a silent coup😢
The three invited speakers seem not neutral on their comments. It seemes that they favored PueThai party and their comments did not root the past problems enough but only crititized what they felt about it.
What's with traditional media always cutting people off?
I hate these commentators intervene people's speech.
Pray for the country 🙏 hypocrite democracy
Reforms and depoliticize
From one Puppet PM to a Proxy PM
Yeah man..they need stability more than anything now..Vietnam are moving forward while Malaysia politics are very stable now but Thailand keep drowning in this circles.
They dont want Democracy they want absolute monarchy,only one thing I could think of.
It’s an absolute turmoils for politicians with unethical conducts but a bright path to participatory democracy. A single individual filed a complaint against a giant political party. Soon unethical corporates. Watch out!!
Being elected is not an excuse for misconduct. Rules of Laws applies equally
It,s a King,s world!
Agreed. Really annoying.
Hi there from southern neighbour 🇲🇾 watching in.
lots of critics of the interviewer. I do not agree. he creates the direction of the discussion and he did that fairly allowing for many good points to be made. It was enlightening discussion on the state of politics after an earthquake of developments. I'm not an outsider, Thailand has been my home long time.
Let's have another interviewer. This guy either trying to show he knows much. Cut off the guest from London who was trying to explain something important. very rude.
What has lese majeste law got to do with current situation? No one insulted the King
Any party that wants to try will be dissolved based on recent reality
Agree! In fact, Sunai Phasuk from Human Rights Watch is specialized in this issue. It's too bad he didn't get a chance to speak.
Corruption
Les mag as sty
Is a out not being able to talk badly about there king.
If ant body dose in thailand the police will come for you 100%. So thia people do not talk openly about him.
Shut this moderator off! He is so bothering. Teach him how to moderate the panels
Short answer to the title is "NO".
It is going down a spiral.
Yes!
He is a Thaksin's puppet. Don't worry he doesn't feel hurt.
James- shut up.
Politician tend to engage their policy with the sensitive issue and use the lèse-majesté law as a tool to suppress dissent or weaken political opponents. In everyday life, it's generally expected that people should treat each other with respect, and laws exist to protect individuals from defamation and insult. And I think that the concept behind lèse-majesté laws in Thailand extends this protection to the monarchy but with much greater severity due to the unique cultural and historical significance of the royal family in Thai society.
The idea is that, just as one would avoid insulting a neighbor out of common decency and fear of legal repercussions, one should especially avoid insulting the monarchy, given its revered status and the severe penalties involved.
NO BRIGHT FUTURE FOR THAILAND..
I need a full-hour program of this panel. Let them finish talking please.
I partly disagree with Veerapat on the adaptation of Phue Thai Party. He said they realised that they can't be liberal all the time for them to survive.
1. They've never been that liberal. Yes they had some progressive policies. But they've never been anti-establishment. The reason they're sacked in the past was because they gained too much popularity. And they wanted to control the establishment themselves.
2.There is no guarantee that after they 'adapt' this time around, they'd survive. It's partly because of the existence of the Move Forward Party that allows the Phue Thai to take the office. The established elites need someone to fight against the rising MFP. The old-friend conservatives can't do this alone so they need Phue Thai on their side. You'll never know if the MFP isn't this popular, the Shinawatra might still be the all-time evil for the elites.
Wonder y mock the monarchy when Thailand had never been colonized b4.
7:29 he was not sacked. The Court terminated him
I’m Thai and there was no surprises for me. The show has been written from the beginning of Srettha’s term. Things will get better, depending on the intelligence of Thai people.
And yes, keep disrupting the speakers is very annoying.
Yes I agree, I found the speakers very informative but the news reporter was rude and annoying, cutting them off. I live in Thailand and am trying to fathom Thai politics which is very difficult. I don't understand now where once the military and Thaksin were waring and now they are acting together?
predictable ,they always win here in the end ,who appoints the judges in this constitutional court but as they say ,a country gets the government they deserve and it's not my battle
23 years here and local politics is what really counts with these folk in my village
Who sits in the Constitutional Court? The ultimate voice in the government?
At the core of the issue is the vying for political supremacy between the Yellow Shirt and the Red Shirt factions in the name of for the betterment of the country. In reality, it's a joke. Investor confidence is shaken. The people are divided. The country is weakened in the long run.
Its all planned out
They have convicted of fraud.
God bless the Kingdom ❤❤❤
Constitutional problems
Unblanced BS. And I live Thailand 18 years
absolute legalised chaos
ช่วยรักษาความสะอาด้วยค่ะที่ฟิลิปินส์คุนจัป่วยเชื่อโรคมากมย😮
to us whi know, this ends with another military coup and Thaksin this time, wont get to flee
That doesn't bode well. No more military, let them stay in the background. The people were really getting angry with the military when they were in power.
I pity the Anchor, many of his questions were ignore or completely misinterpret.
He was loud, irritating and rude. The speakers were interesting and were constantly cut off.
@@nicolelouis8968 No matter how interesting they were, they aren't answer his question.
I'm Thais so I can answer most of the questions myself. That made me a bit irritate on how they beat around a bush and did not directly answer the question.
For example the anchor ask what is lese majeste for some audience that unfamiliar with this term and the answer is Siam political history since 191x, that's not a proper answer.
They can just say that it's a law similar to blasphemous towards king.
They want to be like myanmar and cambodia ruled bt military
Convicted criminal's daughter for PM ??
This is good democracy?
Good discussion...long live the people's will to be free...
❤south❤❤
This host is lame
Completely unprofessional, rude, arrogant journalist. No one taught him respect?
Embarrassing
Just changes its cover but with its old brain still. Nothing more.
Very good discussion 🙏👍🫡
พอให้ทานของข้างถนนน❤❤❤
❤eat. Street foods. ท้องไม่รับผู้ชายกินของสูงไๆไ❤❤
Chess
💪💪💪⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️👉🏼👉🏼
Filipin o. 😮😮😮👌👠👜👜👜💦🤑💪💪💪⭐️⭐️⭐️
It won't if the U.S. doesn't involve them. Hahah
Will The U.S impose sanction on Thailand hahahaha
The issue is not from foreign influence, US or China. The issue comes from domestic affairs.
Thailand is a mess regardless of what the U.S. does.
Nope it's domestic
You've been down too many rabbit 🐇 holes
Speak English
I prefer the Thailand that was under military rule, it was more stable. They should nominate one of the generals to be PM.
Thailand is building a canal in the Ismas of Kra. This is the reason for US's regime change in Thailand.
And the moon landing was faked. And the world is flat
It is the “out going” that was supported by US, not the new one.
china seems to have far more influence in thailand now than the usa.
US got zero to do with it
Thailand isn't building a canal. There is the pipedream of a landbridge which will never happen. Keep your nonsense to yourself.
We haven’t had one in while. I think the old general and army are still the country.i think the one that was elected by the people would have been good for Thai people. But the army wouldn’t let it be