How Pep Guardiola And Manchester City DESTROYED Enzo Maresca and Chelsea - TACTICAL ANALYSIS!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 янв 2025

Комментарии • 22

  • @BryanLammm
    @BryanLammm 52 минуты назад +1

    Very good content! Keep it going🔥

  • @YouTuberJames92610
    @YouTuberJames92610 3 часа назад +2

    Pep had no choice but to risk with Khusanov, and besides all the background, there was obvious communication issue with Akanji in his blunder. Anyways, loved the City's team spirit in the game, players intentionally avoided to pass him the ball, as Khusanov was out of breath in shock and needed some time to calm down. Hope he recovers from this shocker debut, from his face we could see the young lad was literally bleeding inside with heart tears. Then suddenly long balls and change of tactic, pure Pep genius. Great game overall, great boost for City's slow recovery.

  • @elvisminott580
    @elvisminott580 12 часов назад +6

    It’s because Pep is the Teacher, Arsenal next.

    • @TheNextGoalWinsTV
      @TheNextGoalWinsTV  11 часов назад

      Going to be very difficult at the emirates

    • @joesplatnumz
      @joesplatnumz 36 минут назад

      Absolutely 💯💯💯 marmoush will give pressure to CBs alot creating chances for haaland en Foden as well same tactic vs Chelsea 😂😂

  • @godDawg_
    @godDawg_ 11 часов назад +1

    Nice breakdown , good quality
    Very good video in general

  • @munyanezagodfrey513
    @munyanezagodfrey513 9 часов назад

    Good job ❤

  • @HabeshaScoop
    @HabeshaScoop 2 часа назад

    Like your content 👏

  • @adewusifelix8339
    @adewusifelix8339 21 час назад

    If Chelsea had taken rheir chances , there wild av not be anything like guadola master tactics, Jackson shld just go

    • @TheNextGoalWinsTV
      @TheNextGoalWinsTV  18 часов назад

      @@adewusifelix8339 small margins make a big difference. Jackson did have a bad game and nkunku wasnt much better.

    • @NATAR160
      @NATAR160 11 часов назад +1

      What chances? In which game? If the new Man City youngster didn't make that mistake there wd ve been no goal for Chelsea.

    • @harrygonn934
      @harrygonn934 9 часов назад +1

      City had 2.7 expected goals, Chelsea had 1.5 expected goals. City had 6 big chances, Chelsea had 2 big chances via FotMob. These stats show your point is false

    • @abueghan1363
      @abueghan1363 4 часа назад

      ​@@NATAR160exactly Chelsea only had two chances one from the mistake and one from the counter attack . City were dominant

  • @MessymoufEntertainment
    @MessymoufEntertainment 21 час назад

    City were trash for 70 minutes Jackson stopped every attack even a open net

    • @TheNextGoalWinsTV
      @TheNextGoalWinsTV  18 часов назад +4

      @@MessymoufEntertainment negative. City were better than Chelsea and they were more clinical for sure

    • @theflashhunter1025
      @theflashhunter1025 10 часов назад +1

      @MessymoufEntertainment What are u on about did u watch the game XD

    • @harrygonn934
      @harrygonn934 9 часов назад +1

      City had 2.7 expected goals, Chelsea had 1.5 expected goals. City had 6 big chances, Chelsea had 2 big chances via FotMob. These stats show your point is false

  • @NightOwlCręępęr
    @NightOwlCręępęr 44 минуты назад

    RIP MARESCA CHINESE PEP GUARDIOLA WELCOME TO CHELSEA IRAOLA 🤮🤮🤮

    • @TheNextGoalWinsTV
      @TheNextGoalWinsTV  35 минут назад

      @@NightOwlCręępęr haven’t heard that one before 😂