CIE/IGCSE/Physics - half life exam questions - worked solutions

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024

Комментарии • 23

  • @perseus_1945
    @perseus_1945 2 года назад +24

    Thanks! I got my first paper in 50 minutes, wish me luck XD

    • @Unmknowmn
      @Unmknowmn Год назад +1

      I have my retake in 1 hour lmao

  • @7alamohammad819
    @7alamohammad819 3 года назад +19

    this channel is so underrated this vid acc explained everything u r smart

  • @adannew1831
    @adannew1831 Год назад +1

    I can't see the questions,you need to bring your camera closer to the questions.

  • @sofiyyahnadhirah3798
    @sofiyyahnadhirah3798 3 года назад +4

    thank you! this is very helpful

  • @clevereagle1911
    @clevereagle1911 Год назад +1

    I love your handwriting bruv!! 🥲🥲

  • @BadushOhn
    @BadushOhn 11 месяцев назад +1

    This was really helpful 🙏🏻

  • @bikusmoto59
    @bikusmoto59 8 месяцев назад

    Thank you. Handwriting could be better.

  • @hamsabdelhameed8544
    @hamsabdelhameed8544 3 года назад +1

    Thank you so much, you really helped me alot 😭❤️

  • @hamna.902
    @hamna.902 6 месяцев назад

    you just helped me sm, thank you smsmsmsms

  • @AzanShahzad161
    @AzanShahzad161 Год назад +1

    Thnx

  • @serahaleyabastin
    @serahaleyabastin 3 года назад +1

    thank you so much

  • @shivamsingh7389
    @shivamsingh7389 3 года назад

    for 1 d. can the second point simply be protective gear? instead of listing the gear?

  • @thee__brownkid5561
    @thee__brownkid5561 2 года назад +1

    Thanks so much

  • @fujjershahzad5461
    @fujjershahzad5461 3 года назад

    can you share this paper document

  • @ParanormalVoid
    @ParanormalVoid 3 года назад

    Wow.. thanks a lot!!

  • @deeshapatel4809
    @deeshapatel4809 2 года назад

    this was so helpful ty

  • @patty5807
    @patty5807 2 года назад +1

    this was really helpful!

  • @rithvikmallavalli1820
    @rithvikmallavalli1820 3 года назад

    Sorry, not tryna diss or spread hate, but in in Q2C you went wrong. As the 37 counts/min in already without background raddiation

    • @zeyadtarek5660
      @zeyadtarek5660 3 года назад +4

      its Q2B. no she did it correct - The graph shows background radiation plus radioactive sample radiation. So she got 37 by subtracting 15 from the initial value (52)

    • @tokyo7671
      @tokyo7671 3 года назад +2

      nah she did it right, better recheck urself mate

    • @a.s.l711
      @a.s.l711 5 месяцев назад

      @@tokyo7671 but i dont understand why they have to add back the background radiation after they got 18.5....

    • @brunofacee
      @brunofacee 4 месяца назад

      that’s because the graphs shows the reading WITH the background radiation (18.5)