Vivo X100 Ultra Super RAW vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Expert RAW - The RAW Battle!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 июл 2024
- #samsung #vivo #photography
Vivo X100 Ultra Super RAW vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Expert RAW - The RAW Battle!
Enjoy the video!
Subscribe:
📹 ruclips.net/user/velianspeakst...
Join VST membership:
🙌 / @velianspeakstech
Twitter:
🐦 / vst001
Telegram:
📱 t.me/VST001 for new videos & t.me/VSTchat for chat
Instagram:
📸 / velianspeakstech 
Наука
Thank you so much! Your work and quick response to our requests deserve tons of likes!
Tnx man, really want to cover it all
On the Vivo, you can play with shadow areas and achieve better results. That's important when you try to maintain a good dynamic range and avoid losing details due to extreme editing.
Thanks, sir for the comparison. I love to see it after the August mega Update for the S24 Ultra.
Can't wait either
Is the video zoom lens for the ViVo phone not x30 as shown in the official advertisement for the phone !!!
Thanks
Check my reply on your other conment
Thank you very much.
What Smartphone would you recommed just in Camera Zoom between 3x - 40x ?
can you please upload the ultra raw files of the VIVO ? and .. the vivox100 ultra produce , for each of its camera a max 12mpx raw ? thanks because actually I m interested for this and the oppox7 find ultra, that can take 50mpx max res to each camera. thanks in advance for you answer. regards
Finally someone tested X100 ultras super RAW
Each picture has very organic processing and detail
I thought the whole point of RAW pictures is to get as neutral/natural picture as possibe and then edit it as you wish. That grass on Samsung shot does not look unprocessed...
RAW yes, but this is ExpertRAW on Samsung, HDR processing, combination of multiple raw photos.
And SuperRAW on Vivo, same idea.
@@VelianSpeaksTech yeah, it's good idea but poor execution imo. Samsungs terrible processing is what actually ruins pictures the most.
Thx you so much
My opinion is that Samsung s24 ultra cannot be inferior in detail in 5x mode - since this is a full optical zoom and we get an image from the entire sensor without loss of quality. This is what we see in the test. However, even in this mode, strange algorithms work that add excessive sharpness and ruin the natural depth of the frame. I believe that it is also necessary to conduct tests at 10x and 30x to see the limits of the matrices of both gadgets.
Well that's what I expected but it seems that Samsung Isocell HP9, the 200MP tele camera in the Vivo is strong..
sir, want to know that, which shows more natural colors of the two. Please do the reply.
Both
@@VelianSpeaksTech don't you think, vivo make the images bright?
No, both phones reproduce very accurate colors and natural rendition, the only issues are with some titns in low light scenarios on the vivo, but that's not dramatic
nice video bro, i do like to see more content for RAW capability for low light and how it perform when there are human and animal in there too. And might test how "stable" are their RAW, example how much color bit that both device could take in their SRAW/ERAW and is it every shot also result the similar dynamic color and EXIF, especially Vivo since i heard many chinese complain that their processing are not stable, example take 5 similar photos, but only 1 shot might look good.
Thanks for the video, did you used 50MP on the vivo?
Super RAW High Resolution on purpose vs 50MP on S24U wide and ST [5x]
i have the same problem on my galaxy s23U expert raw image heavly oversharpend but in pro mode the opposite no oversharpness like the vivo x100u
Vivo X100 Ultra ❤
Need one clarification: The RAW images of S24 Ultra are shot in which Resolution? 12 MP / 24 MP / 50 MP ?? ( Because it will matter a lot in results & quality)
50MP on wide camera 1X and 50MP on ST 5X camera, I clarify this in the intro.
@@VelianSpeaksTech okay got it
Vivo❤
Вели, хайде направи едно видео само за портрети на x100 Ultra в сравнение с конкуренцията де
Ще се опитам, инак в сравнението срещу S24U и iPhone 15 Pro Max имаше портрети
@@VelianSpeaksTech please do a full portrait comparison. I am in support 🙏
@@VelianSpeaksTech and well done for the hard work
I played with the S24 Ultra a while, specifically with RAW files - and they were crap. Worst "RAW" files I ever worked on.. processed and not much latitude to work on. This was a few months ago.
There should be iphone 15 pro max instead of Samsung s24 ultra
Samsung camera is just a hype...its never good
Samsung absolutely have no idea with Raw as they even overprocess the raw. WTH 😅😅😅
Though Samsung looks vibrant BUT it defeats the purpose of RAW. The RAW means minimum to NO processing and for some weird reasons Samsung choose to process the RAW files too. Pathetic Samsung
Not really, this isn't just RAW, its Expert RAW, it stacks together multiple RAW photos and applies HDR and etc.
@@bruceparker3139 that's exactly what I'm thinking
Xiaomi 14 ultra vs Vivo x100 ultra,. Zoom battle ,please.
Vivo❤😊
Use simple raw on S24
Yeah first thing I do on any galaxy since the Note 8 is to turn off the stupid digitalization and sharpening in the camera settings... It's just pure dumb not sure what even the purpose is...
Man how to turn off say please😢
@Joe-ritz on my s24 now it's called Intelligent optimisation in the camera app settings, which you can set to minimum and maximum, and scene optimizer too. Also, when you shut this thing off, you can take pictures much faster... which was always curious to me why they did it in the first place. Only consumes more energy. Maybe they like it in Korea with their fake faces, so fake photos too??
I am pretty sure you can say "s24 ultra" more often in one video.