yoo @Biographics (or @Simon) can you do video about Tom Horn (a cowboy during the years 1884ish to 1903) or Andrew Kehoe (a farmer turned to an insane mass murderer) i would really like to see videos of these two preferably on Andrew Kehoe. thanks :)
@@anne-droid7739 How does the state exactly enforce a famine? There's no evidence of the USSR "taking all of the food" or magically stopping people from farming. The fact is that it was mostly a result of kulak resistance to collectivization, since they used destructive means to protest collectivization. And before anyone claims that collectivization was authoritarian or oppressive, by definition it literally entails getting rid of landlords you exploit farmers.
@@MarcelloSevero Whoopsie--you made a very telling Freudian slip: I'm not a landlord. Nor am I Ukrainian, Kazakh, or anyone else who was driven to cannibalism under Stalin's experiments. See, we humans as a whole--collectively--share a common morality, and we don't like Stalin's experiments any more than we like anyone else's.
Well yeah that’s a good thing; wouldn’t you have done the same if you wanted to overpower him? And imagine how bad it would’ve been if Trotsky was leader instead of Stalin.
You just forgot to told where Trotsky got his name. Leon was the name of his grandfather and Trotsky was the name of a warden he met when he was in prison.
@@williehawaii9967 Ah a racist, how does it feel to know that you are what is wrong with the world? Tell us all about your fears that one day humanity will be a slightly darker skin tone and that this is a real problem to care about...
Alright guys how about we calm the Hell down? Leon Trotsky took 2 cool sounding names and made them one cooler more well known one. Thats it and thats all.
Mr. Bones go on Twitter. Look up Jewish writers. All claiming to be part of the white race. And when you attack them they will reveal themselves to be Jewish and call you an antisemite
Leon Trotsky about Stalin : " The vengeance of history is more powerful than the vengeance of any powerful general secretary ." . History proved him right.!!!
@Barrack Obama Vlogs Not true at all. Stalinist bureaucracy is 100% incompatible with a dictatorship of the proletariat which is crucial to Leninist theory. Stalin certainly claimed to be as close as you could get, but prior to lenins death, even he started to take issue with stalin as their political ideas were diverging as early as ~1923
Stupid capitalist imperialist pig...in Soviet union we have "Atmospheric audio chambers" which is used for hearing glorious songs about motherland and communism
this is bs. this trotsky & early revolutionaries good, stalin bad narrative is bs. no mention of the red terror planned mostly by the leader of the red army. no mention of the prosecution of even communist and socialists by the red army. also the bolsheviks were not the many and the mensheviks were not the few. and power did not just 'go' to the bolsheviks, it was grabbed with a coup on both governments because the petrograd soviet would not vote for violent revolution. and if trotsky were to take power the soviet union would probably face a military intervention from most of the world because of his internationalist crap. the only criticism on trotsky here is his no war no peace bs, which is nothing compared to other things.
PS: Trotsky was much more of a ”street-fighter” than Stalin (or Lenin) was. And no Marxist revolutionary considered himself an ”idealist”, a word that was used as an insult.
Street-fighter? That's understatement dude! As a General (don't know real rank name) he sometimes personally led soldiers into battle. I mean all Revolutionaries are strong-willed but oh man, was Trotsky a zealous one! P.S. Answering to the first question: Yes, we're Marxists.
🤣 The comments on this vid are hilarious. Please keep advertising your ignorance. Trotsky was a spineless rat who changed his mind every two secs behind he was a vain political opportunist.
Gipsy Danger you should check out the alternate history hub video “what if Stalin never came to power”. It is probably the best answer to that what if scenario you’ll ever find.
Well if Trotsky was reinstalled into government before Operation Barbarossa, the Germans would never have gotten so close to Moscow and probably would never have reached Stalingrad.
@Joseph Melendez like I said, the one of the main reason the Soviet got pushed back hard was because the complete lack of preparation and many of the officers were dead thus resulting in the lack of organization, the main reasons the Soviet won was because the German just didn't have enough resources to defeat the Soviet, and the encirclement in Stalingrad was just too much for Germany to handle, Stalin Paranoia caused the German to win in the early war, it was just after the Soviet recover from the purge the Soviet started winning
@Joseph Melendez nah, the people that got purged was not incompetent, Stalin were scared of them, the Soviet would be far better at fighting the German in the early war if the people that got purged are still alive, and the reason why the Soviet was caught of guard was because of, guess who, Stalin, he trusted Hitler too much, despite the western allies telling him that the German are going to invade soon, Stalin thought if Germany and Soviet are going to war, the Soviet will be at the offense, he was wrong
There is no if, it would have been a communist hell hole as ALL communist countries become. We have had over 100 years of communism being tried and all we have to show for it is a death toll so high it may never be fully tallied. It's a failed evil system invented by a man who never had a job in his life and never actively participated in the system he hated there for knowing nothing of it.
I wish they would clarify that the "ice pick" is an *"ice axe"* used for mountain climbing, and not the type used to chip ice in the kitchen (that resembles a screw-driver). I think most people hearing of an attack with an "ice pick" would think of a screw-driver, not a hand-axe.
Pezfeo exactly! I was looking through the comments to see if anybody picked up on the error. The specifics: Ice Axes have a long shaft of made of wood or metal ~45-60 cm (~2.5 feet) long with a sharp metal point on one end and a head with a narrow pick and sharp, slightly curved adze on the other. The tool is used in alpine mountaineering. The pick or shaft is used to “self arrest” a fall that happens when climbing on a glacier or snowfield. The adze is used to cut foot & hand holds in ice or hard snow. The pick side of the Ice Axe head is ~25 cm long at least 1 cm wide and 4 mm thick steel. The pick that killed Trotsky was not a simple spike: It was a curved and hardened steel shaft attached to a long handle that the assassin swung at Trotsky’s head. It’s remarkable that Trotsky survived for any period of time. Why an ice axe? There are three volcanos just south of Mexico City with summits that are much higher than 14,000 ft. Pico de Orizaba is 18,700 ft and it is the third highest peak in the Western Hemisphere.
SiVlog Edit: My blind pro-Trotsky argument was utter cringe, much like this entire comment section. There was not that much of a difference between Stalin and Trotsky, each had good ideas and strategies, it’s just that Stalin was a lot more organised and concise. Neither were bad leaders.
@@cezarcatalin1406 you forget that trotsky was an imperialist, so there also would have been incredible state control as well as countless more wars. Look up Trotskivite communism
@@ts-wo6pp His ideological forefathers did. Along with elements that later became Nazis. Especially the triggerman who was later given an award by the Nazis after they assumed power.
@@jaysonbiggs8979 wdym Sanders is being immune to mortal worries such as "aging". He was directly involved with the assassination. Jokes aside, didn't the social Democrats just hand it off to the brownshirts to do?
@@ts-wo6pp No brownshirts at that time. It was the Freikorps. Who were decomissioned WWI right wing officers. Later to become part of the Brownshirts. The Social Dems and Freikorps worked to kill her and Karl Leibkernecht. Shot. She always said she wanted to die on the barricades fighting for revolution. Not the way she did. Her shot body dumped in a river. Today there is a plaque to commemorate where the body was dumped in the river. Germans and people from around the world regularly visit the spot.
You managed to take Trotsky’s character in a very objective view as gray as it is not a monster or an angel just a man looking to have his place in this world
Or...a frustrated man child who couldn't live upto his Dad's expectations of him to be a provider, and like many Ashkenazi Jews fantasized and later instigated mass persecution of Slavic people.. especially Christians.
Trotsky, as Commissar of the Red Army was infamous for its “scorched earth” and “take no prisoners” tactics. And not just with their enemies. On one occasion, in a Soviet planning meeting, the other members all disagreed with Trotsky’s argument, and were preparing to vote his proposal down. He reached under the desk, pulled out a sub-machine gun and shot the lot of them. Then noted his proposal down in the Minutes as having been approved “Nem Con”.
Trotsky was never the monster in the Soviet Union that some in the West made him out to be. That was Stalin. Trotsky preferred moderation. He remained committed to the best and noble aspirations of communism, whereas Stalin opted for cruelty and used the people as cannon fodder and menial labor with no respect for the value of their lives. The Cold War propaganda about Trotsky was ultimately somewhat unfair. He didn't do anything in the violent early years of Soviet civil war that other leaders would have to have done. Some of the stories of his violence are apocryphal, including the one mentioned here in this thread. Condemn Stalin all you want. He deserves it. Trotsky ... Not so much. If he had followed Lenin, the subsequent history of the USSR would probably have been very different. Certainly not perfect, but probably a little less nasty than stalinism.
The author of the book, George Orwell was a Trotskyism follower, in both Animal Farm and '1984', he had Stalin and Trotsky written into the book. In Animal Farm, Napoleon was clearly the Joseph Stalin, Snowball was clearly Trotsky. While in '1984', the 'Big Brother' has been Stalin and the degenerated worker state as the party.
@@tersolarcells9656 he was a democratic socialist not a trotskyist. And as a libertarian i still STRONGLY admire orwell's stance against authoritarianism, even if im not a leftist
SP1TF1RE Stalin *Meets Lennin and Trotsky laughing Stalin : What’s going on? Trotsky : I told Lennin a joke. Stalin: You want to hear a good one? Trotsky: Sure Stalin : Ice pick to the head. Trotsky : I don’t get it. Stalin : Not yet.
I always appreciate how thorough and detailed these episodes are, yall clearly give your research it's due diligence with as little bias as possible! Thank you!
from the bolsje-wikipedia: "The two factions were originally known as "hard" (Lenin's supporters) and "soft" (Martov's supporters), but the terminology soon changed to "Bolsheviks" and "Mensheviks", from the Russian bolshinstvo ("majority") and menshinstvo ("minority"). On the other hand, Martov's supporters won the vote concerning the question of party membership. Neither Lenin nor Martov had a firm majority throughout the Congress as delegates left or switched sides. At the end, the Congress was evenly split between the two factions. " Lenin adopted the term 'majority', because 'hard' sounded bad. It refers to Lenin's proposed policy that would ensure a majority of orthodox communists in power ('a hard core') by strict ideological testing for party membership, while the Mensheviks, by advocating opening up membership, were allegedly jeopardizing this orthodoxy. It does not refer to any factual majority and Lenin ended democracy before any such facts could be established. The Bolsjewiks were never the majority.
No, the Bolsheviks were in fact a majority in 1903, and it's common knowledge that that's where the name derives from and refers to. Obviously the situation changes within the RSDLP as time go on, and the names continues to stick even though within a few years they ceased to be two factions of the same party and become separate organizations. No point pretending there's something "dishonest" about the name.
"we are going to get to the very important October revolution, but, first, let me tell you about our sponsor" made me laugh really hard for some reason.
Stalin v. Trotsky. A theme which occurs over and over in history and legend. Able and Cain, Jacob and Esau, Romulus and Remus. Brothers in arms together and frequently against each other. Very archetypal.
I rage quit when he said that Trotsky created the first soviet. Soviets were a form of worker self-organization, they came “from below” from workers themselves and not from the plan of an intellectual. Bourgeois history gets so much wrong sometimes!
"Bourgeois history" lmfao. Yeah, that's what gets things wrong, not a book which tries to devolve all of human history to a simple conflict of class...
Way back in school, i wish i had biographics in the palm of my hands. I studied History as one of my major subjects. I would have done 100 times better had I had Biographics at my fingertips. Thank-You Simon for a job well done. I sincerely enjoy brushing up on all the familiar names in history .
Trotsky: *exists* Stalin: remove him from power Trotsky: fled to Mexico and write essay criticising stalin Stalin: *I'm gonna put an end to this man's career*
An ice axe is a multi-purpose hiking and climbing tool used by mountaineers in both the ascent and descent of routes that involve snow, ice, or frozen conditions. Its use depends on the terrain: in its simplest role it is used like a walking stick, with the mountaineer holding the head in the center of their uphill hand. On steep terrain it is swung by its handle and embedded in snow or ice for security and an aid to traction. It can also be buried pick down, the rope tied around the shaft to form a secure anchor on which to bring up a second climber, or buried vertically to form a stomp belay. The adze is used to cut footholds, as well as scoop out compacted snow to bury the axe as a belay anchor. The ice axe of today has its roots in the long-handled alpenstock that came before it. Not only is an ice axe used as a climbing aid, but also as a means of self-arrest in the event of a slip downhill. Most ice axes meet design and manufacturing standards of organizations such as the Union Internationale des Associations d'Alpinisme (UIAA) or European Committee for Standardization (CEN). There are two classifications of ice axe, Basic (B/Type 1) and Technical (T/Type 2). Basic ice axes are designed for use in snow conditions for general mountaineering, and are adequate for basic support and self-arrest. Technical ice axes, which may have curved shafts, are strong enough to be used for steep or vertical ice climbing and belaying on such ground. Specialized scaled-down ice axes used for vertical ice climbing are known as ice tools. Ice tools have shorter and more curved shafts; stronger, sharper, and more curved replaceable picks, and often ergonomic grips and finger rests. Used in a pair, one is usually equipped with an adze for chipping and clearing snow whilst the other has a hammer to aid gear placement. For ski mountaineering and racing, where weight is of paramount concern, manufacturers have produced short (~45 cm (18 in)) and light (200-300 g (7-11 oz)) ice axes. Some of these have aluminum alloy heads/picks which are unlikely to be as effective or robust as steel heads/picks. An ice axe consists of at least five components: Head - usually made of steel and featuring a pick and adze. A hole in the center is provided for attaching a wrist leash or carabiner. Pick - the toothed pointed end of the head, typically slightly curved (aiding both in ergonomics and self-arrest). Adze - the flat, wide end of the head used for chopping steps in hard snow and ice. Hammer - the hammer is an alternative to the adze. May be used for aiding placement of protection. Shaft - straight or slightly angled, typically wider front-to-back than side-to-side, flat on the sides and smoothly rounded on the ends. Traditional shafts were made of wood, but are now almost exclusively of lightweight metals (such as aluminum, titanium and steel alloys) or composites (including fiberglass, Kevlar or carbon filament). Spike, or ferrule - a point at the base of the shaft used for balance and safety when the axe is held by its head in walking stick fashion. Usually made of steel. Ice axe accessories include: Leash - nylon webbing with an adjustable loop for securing the axe to hand. Often secured by a ring constrained to slide a limited distance on the shaft. Leash stop - a rubber keeper or metal stud preventing the leash from slipping off of the ice axe. Snow basket - similar to baskets on ski poles, temporarily mounted on the shaft close to the spike to keep the shaft from sinking into soft snow. Not at all common in Europe. Pick and adze guard - a cover to protect from sharp edges and points when the axe is not being used. Spike guard - a cover to protect from the sharp spike when the axe is not being used. Ice-axe spike-to-head lengths used to generally range from 60-90 cm (24-35 in). This is just too short to be used as a walking stick on level ground (the way its forebearer, the 150-centimetre-long (5 ft) 19th century alpenstock, was), but is ergonomic when ascending steep slopes. For flatter ground, where consequences of a slip are not large, walking poles are more appropriate. The old method to approximate the correct length of an ice axe was for the climber to hold the axe (spike facing the ground) at his/her side while standing relaxed. The spike of the ice axe should barely touch the ground when the climber stands fully upright holding the axe in this manner.[2] This may still be appropriate where the ice axe is to be used for travelling over relatively flat ground, perhaps, in the main, for glacier travel. Modern mountaineers often carry shorter ice axes, 45-60 cm (18-24 in), for general use with any thing over 60 cm (24 in) being generally regarded as too large and unwieldy for chopping steps or climbing steep snow. A walking pole (providing a third point of contact), although stabilising and making a slip less likely, is unlikely to stop a fall. The antecedent of the ice axe was the alpenstock, a long wooden pole with an iron spike tip, used by shepherds for travel on snowfields and glaciers in the Alps since the Middle Ages. On 8 August 1786, Jacques Balmat and Michel-Gabriel Paccard made the first ascent of Mont Blanc. Balmat, a chamois hunter and crystal collector, had experience with high mountain travel, and Paccard had made previous attempts to climb the peak. Illustrations show Balmat carrying two separate tools that would later be merged into the ice axe - an alpenstock (or baton) and a small axe that could be used to chop steps on icy slopes. According to the earliest manufacturer of ice axes, Grivel, these two tools were merged to create the first true ice axe around 1840. Early ice axes had a vertical adze, with the cutting edge aligned with the direction of the shaft, as in a conventional axe. This design lasted until at least 1860, but eventually the adze was rotated to the current position, perpendicular to the direction of the shaft. The Italian Alpine Club published a book in 1889 entitled Fiorio e Ratti - The dangers of mountaineering and rules to avoid them, which recommended ice axes as among "the inseparable companions of the mountaineer". In the late 19th century, the typical ice axe shaft measured 120-130 cm (47-51 in) in length. British climber Oscar Eckenstein started the trend toward shorter ice axes with a lighter model measuring 85-86 cm (33-34 in). Initially, this innovation was criticized by well-known climbers of the era, including Martin Conway, a prominent member of the Alpine Club, who was the leader of an early expedition to the Baltoro region near K2 in 1892 of which Eckenstein was a member. Early ice axes had picks and adzes of about equal lengths. By the beginning of the 20th century, the pick lengthened to about twice the length of the adze. Improvements in crampon design (pioneered by Eckenstein in 1908) and ice climbing technique led to use of shorter, lighter ice axes appropriate to steeper ice climbs in the period between the world wars. A famous rescue involving an ice axe took place during the Third American Karakoram Expedition to K2 in 1953. One of the climbers, Art Gilkey, was incapacitated by thrombophlebitis. The other climbers attempted to rescue him by lowering him down the mountain by rope, wrapped in a sleeping bag. While crossing a steep ice sheet, a slip caused Gilkey and five other climbers to begin falling down a steep slope. Climber Pete Schoening wedged his ice axe alongside a boulder, and managed to belay the roped climbers, saving their lives. (Gilkey, however, later in the same descent was swept away by an avalanche. Remains of his lost corpse were discovered in 1993.[9]) Schoening's ice axe is now on display at the Bradford Washburn American Mountaineering Museum in Golden, Colorado. In 1966, Yvon Chouinard led a significant redesign of ice axes, working with initially reluctant manufacturer Charlet to develop a 55-centimetre-long (22 in) ice axe with a dramatically curved pick. Chouinard believed that "a curve compatible with the arc of the axe's swing would allow the pick to stay put better in the ice. I had noticed that a standard pick would often pop out when I placed my weight on it." Chouinard's idea worked and began a period of innovation in ice axe design. In 1978, the Safety Commission of the Union Internationale des Associations d'Alpinisme (UIAA) established formal standards for ice axe safety and performance. This led to the replacement of the traditional wooden shaft by metal alloy shafts. Ergonomically curved handles became widespread in 1986. Use of modern aluminum alloys have led to a dramatic reduction in the weight of some ice axes. One model now on the market, the C.A.M.P. Corsa, weighs only 205 g (7.2 oz) with a 50-centimetre-long (20 in) shaft. One expert rated this lightweight ice axe as "ideal for low angle glacier travel" but said he "craved the solid and secure heft of a true steel mountain ax" in more demanding steep alpine conditions. When not in use an ice axe is stored on the outside of a pack (rucksack). Many models come with a nylon webbing loop sewn on its rear base (off to one side to allow the pick to stay behind the hiker), together with a means to restrain its shaft. Rucksacks with attachment points for two ice axes are also available, popular in ice climbing where two tools are used.
Brilliant....THAT is what your channels are Simon! They're quickly becoming THE big favourites of those that I subscribe to! Looking forward to see many more videos! 👍🏻👌🏻👏🏻
4:50 quite the opposite. They wanted to impose a socialist state whereas communism is a stateless classless society. The idea of a transition directly to communism with no intermediary state is the main line of first international anarchists, and we know how the Bolsheviks felt about Anarchists...
Wilhelm Reich is incredibly fascinating and would love to see a biographic on him. Austrian doctor of medicine and psychoanalyst, a member of the second generation of analysts after Sigmund Freud. The author of several influential books which left Dr.Wilhelm Reich known as one of the most radical figures in the history of psychiatry. “The great psychiatrist Wilhelm Reich once wrote, "No President, Academy, Court of Law, Congress or Senate on this earth has the knowledge or power to decide what will be the knowledge of tomorrow." In 1957, the government of the United States of America jailed Dr. Reich and burned all of his published works. Wilhelm Reich in Hell provides a remarkable new look at the vilification and destruction of a great man who refused to bow to Gestapo tactics.”- Wilhelm Reich In Hell by Robert Anton Wilson 😇
"Whatever happened to Leon Trotsky? He got an ice pick. That made his ears burn." Summed up by The Stranglers in 3 lines.... Almost as good as a potted History lesson as: "Ra-Ra-Rasputin, lover of the Russian Queen. There was a cat who really was gone!" 😉
It's amazing that a century later, there's still so much bias and misinformation out there about Trotsky. This video does a decent job, but when a topic is as controversial as this, one ought not to dance over the historical sources so lightly.
A number of inaccuracies: He adopted the name Trotsky because it was the name of one of his guards during his first (or second) imprisonment. The Bolshevik- Menshevik split was over what type of organization would lead a revolution. The big issue behind that was what type of revolution did Russia need. There was no "communist newspaper" in the early 1900's. Because there was no communist party. No one called themselves communist. That title came around 1919. They called themselves Social Democrats. His last words were actually directed at his followers: "Go forward."
Would love to see a source for your claim that the Finnish White Guard were the reason of the execution. The White Guard of Finland were a wee bit busy consolidating in their own country. While some members of the Finnish whites did lead expeditions into Russian territory, it was mainly in Eastern Karelia. The generally accepted theory for the order of the execution was the approaching Czechoslovak Legions, which had been asked by the Entente powers to attempt a rescue of the Imperial Family.
Very very informative. You have summed up Trotsky so that I know just enough and don't have to plough through literature as I would find that too hard going. So, thanks!
Always interesting Simon. Always entertaining. Great research by the team and well written. Is there anything else worth watching other than Simon Whistler content? 🤔🤷🏻
Natasha has just come up to the window from the courtyard and opened it wider so that the air may enter more freely into my room. I can see the bright green strip of grass beneath the wall, and the clear blue sky above the wall, and sunlight everywhere. Life is beautiful. Let the future generations cleanse it of all evil, oppression and violence, and enjoy it to the full. Leon Trotsky
Quick correction: the Mensheviks actually had the majority of support at the convention where the bolsheviks and Mensheviks split. Lenin purposefully named his party the majority even though they had less support because he knew it would give his version of communism a rhetorical advantage and the Mensheviks foolishly went along with it. This is according to the biography of Lenin by Victor Sebestyen
And there a tons of mistakes in the majority of them, but nobody who watches his videos is well researched in the topics so they just take his word for it and assume the research is good
I’ve grown obsessed with Russian history, culture and Literature. If every biography I read about a Russian and they always read such literature. Then it must really mean something
I enjoy these presentations which is why I get so annoyed by the mistakes. Trotskty did not go into exile in Mexico with his son, but with his grandson who (if he's still alive) lives in Mexico until this day
Now you *have* to do a video on Frida Kahlo. With a separate one for Diego Rivera. A Jackson Pollock video would be lovely too. Along with one on the French Painter Manet (and no commenters, that's not a typo for Monet).
*The Permanent Revolution* One of his greatest books. It's a book that explains with details how Stalin betrayed the Proletariat state that was raised after the triumph of the revolution. Another great reference is the Latin American trotskyist Nahuel Moreno. Specially his work *Revolutions of the XX century*
That's even true Christina O. But that's not useful to know. Because variations of Lenin-Marxists at the time thought it was twisted to know that half the Russian Soviets didn't want Stalin to win the war on the starvation to freedom which continued to escalade throughout the first time Hitler died. So are you suggesting that Lenin didn't forge what was to create an empire just because a Plekhanov or a mongrel didn't believe that Russia had a backbone to believe in freedom. That was also being forged.
@@MineTuber Gulag and Holodomor were not because of Trostky(Holodomor happened under Stalin),he was responsible for allot of death yes this true,like all people in Russian Civil war.Btw even without being Cummunist,he is a man that single handley changed the entire history of the world not even once but twice and btw loved by most people at the time(in Saint Petersburg and Army especially)because of his bravery and hard work.
I'm gonna come back every time you guys post a new video, just to comment that I would like to see one done on Terence McKenna. Thank you for your time.
Ok. You've mentioned Frida Kahlo in this video. Now, can you do her very interesting life? Similar names you can touch on from the USSR include Semyon Budyonny, Nikolai Yezhov, and Felix Dzerzhinsky,
Towards the end, yes. But when the parties were formed in 1903 and for almost all of the period up to the October Revolution afterwards, that was the case. The Bolsheviks' rise in mid-1917 was very rapid and fuelled partly by vast sums of money spent on them by Imperial Germany.
I follow many of your channels, Simon. And alongside Visual..., Biographics may be your finest work. Perfect length to delve into the material but not get lost in the forest for the trees; quite balanced, and well-sourced. And you’re an excellent presenter.
Except he never was committed to Communism, only to himself. Study more. The guy was a total fraud who sold the world a fantasy version of himself because he lacked the guts to get his hands dirty and actually "do the work" like Lenin and Stalin.
Thank you Brilliant for making this one possible! Check out Brilliant here: brilliant.org/biographics
yoo @Biographics (or @Simon) can you do video about Tom Horn (a cowboy during the years 1884ish to 1903) or Andrew Kehoe (a farmer turned to an insane mass murderer) i would really like to see videos of these two preferably on Andrew Kehoe. thanks :)
Leon Trotsky thinks youre hotsky.
Harry Truman
Can you do a video on Mr Rogers?
We did. ruclips.net/video/8WCnQ1WUcwA/видео.html
*The most deported man I've ever heard of*
The most deported man lived in mexico until his death. This was before the wall was built. How ironic.
@William II Power Oy vey, mate.
Well, it's one way to travel the world for free.
Legend has it, he is still being deported to this day.
The Godless Antisemitic much?
Trotsky was exiled from the USSR in 1929. The first KFC opened in 1930. Coincedence? I THINK NOT!
Whoa... Mind = Blown
He even looked like the Colonell and was dedicated to feed the poor...
Based and Chickenpilled
Another fine win for Trotskyism! Workers revolution and fried chicken? I'm loving it.
Impossible
Shooting stars: Sad Lennin.
Shooting Tzars: Happy Lennin.
RIP Saint Nicholas II
@@haikat4 You mean Tsar Nicholas II
*Lenin
haikat4 LLL
@@t.c.6920 Lemon*
Using a hunger strike to protest somebody like Stalin is not exactly the best life choice to make. 🤔
It worked tho
MrCordycep That's the cleverest reference to state-enforced famine I've ever heard.
Brilliant.
@@anne-droid7739 How does the state exactly enforce a famine? There's no evidence of the USSR "taking all of the food" or magically stopping people from farming. The fact is that it was mostly a result of kulak resistance to collectivization, since they used destructive means to protest collectivization. And before anyone claims that collectivization was authoritarian or oppressive, by definition it literally entails getting rid of landlords you exploit farmers.
@@MarcelloSevero Whoopsie--you made a very telling Freudian slip: I'm not a landlord. Nor am I Ukrainian, Kazakh, or anyone else who was driven to cannibalism under Stalin's experiments. See, we humans as a whole--collectively--share a common morality, and we don't like Stalin's experiments any more than we like anyone else's.
After Lenin died, Stalin told Trotsky that the funeral was happening on the wrong date, causing him to miss it.
Aw
Well yeah that’s a good thing; wouldn’t you have done the same if you wanted to overpower him? And imagine how bad it would’ve been if Trotsky was leader instead of Stalin.
The way Stalin constantly fucked with Trotsky is actually hilarious.
Chili the PUBGer no Trotsky would've been way better leader. Serious dick move from Stalin
@@afonya553 trotsky would have been way better stalin was a retard brute
At Trotsky's funeral people came to pay their respects to the dearly deported.
Doug Douglas
Stop
Why so mad
A number of people saw no 'point' in it, and felt many of the mourners were hand 'picked'.
@@iainrobb2076 lol, good one
This one right here
You just forgot to told where Trotsky got his name.
Leon was the name of his grandfather and Trotsky was the name of a warden he met when he was in prison.
@@williehawaii9967 Ah a racist, how does it feel to know that you are what is wrong with the world? Tell us all about your fears that one day humanity will be a slightly darker skin tone and that this is a real problem to care about...
Alright guys how about we calm the Hell down? Leon Trotsky took 2 cool sounding names and made them one cooler more well known one. Thats it and thats all.
@@williehawaii9967 i-what?
Mr. Bones go on Twitter. Look up Jewish writers. All claiming to be part of the white race. And when you attack them they will reveal themselves to be Jewish and call you an antisemite
Jacques du Plessis tell me how black people didn’t have wheels or a writing system when white people found them in subsahara africa
Leon Trotsky about Stalin :
" The vengeance of history is more powerful than the vengeance of any powerful general secretary ." .
History proved him right.!!!
@Red Baron I would've had Stalin gargling on my nut if I was born in 1900
No history didn't do so! Stalin didn't see ussr fall.
Stalin: You kept me from the room where it happens for the last time
(Hamilton obedient servant)
@@bryankochar7615 best pull his teeth first.
"I know that after death, a pile of rubbish will be put on my grave. But the wind of history will ruthlessly dispel it"
J.V. Stalin
Trosky: "Hey Comrades, what if we try not betraying the people we claim to represent?" Every other communist party member: "GULAG"
I think it would have gone suddenly silent, you can hear crickets chirping.
48 hours later 70% of the people there were deported
Trotsky was more of a Communist than Stalin
All Stalin did was change the Capitalist
Trotsky knee this and wanted to explunge the whole power dynamic
@Barrack Obama Vlogs Not true at all. Stalinist bureaucracy is 100% incompatible with a dictatorship of the proletariat which is crucial to Leninist theory. Stalin certainly claimed to be as close as you could get, but prior to lenins death, even he started to take issue with stalin as their political ideas were diverging as early as ~1923
still communism isnt a working system
@@SmokinCommy trotsky is a revisionist.
Oh my god Trotsky there’s an assassin behind you. Oh my god he can’t hear us he has AirPods in
Let's speak in sign language
🖐️🖐️👇☝️👆👉🖕🖕👊✊👎👋🙌🤲👏👐🤟🙏🤜🏻💪
Stupid capitalist imperialist pig...in Soviet union we have "Atmospheric audio chambers" which is used for hearing glorious songs about motherland and communism
@How bout' you chill Bolsheviks had no issue with change in technology. Just corporatism.
Air pods are trash - they don't cancel out sound at all. I think he would've been fine ;)
@@brewtalityk its just a joke
This is extremely accurate and doesn’t seem to be biased as some of the other videos I have seen on trotsky, keep up the good work!
this is bs. this trotsky & early revolutionaries good, stalin bad narrative is bs. no mention of the red terror planned mostly by the leader of the red army. no mention of the prosecution of even communist and socialists by the red army.
also the bolsheviks were not the many and the mensheviks were not the few. and power did not just 'go' to the bolsheviks, it was grabbed with a coup on both governments because the petrograd soviet would not vote for violent revolution.
and if trotsky were to take power the soviet union would probably face a military intervention from most of the world because of his internationalist crap.
the only criticism on trotsky here is his no war no peace bs, which is nothing compared to other things.
Joseph Stalin ruined communism
We need to resurrect Rasputin!!!
@@Nolongerhereanymore Strange logic. What has Rasputin to do with communism?
@@Nolongerhereanymore egh, it was marx.
The part about the Russian civil war is kinda inaccurate though.
PS: Trotsky was much more of a ”street-fighter” than Stalin (or Lenin) was.
And no Marxist revolutionary considered himself an ”idealist”, a word that was used as an insult.
Are you a Marxist?
We are materialists.
Street-fighter? That's understatement dude! As a General (don't know real rank name) he sometimes personally led soldiers into battle. I mean all Revolutionaries are strong-willed but oh man, was Trotsky a zealous one!
P.S. Answering to the first question: Yes, we're Marxists.
Perhaps so. Stalin was a sneaky back stairs political operator. FAR more important than being a street fighter.
🤣 The comments on this vid are hilarious. Please keep advertising your ignorance.
Trotsky was a spineless rat who changed his mind every two secs behind he was a vain political opportunist.
Señor Trotsky?
Ur Gai Yeah not good, señor.
@Ur Gai Yeah much better than now
Napoleon I Bonaparte Trostky*
Icepick got your Mr Trotsky ?
It's Mr Adam Hilt!
You guys are unbelievable, can’t seem to get enough of these biographies!
Thanks!!
🎶 "YOU'RE UNBELIEVABLE!"
@@phil4863 WE'RE UNBELIEVABLE
I'm unbelievable
@@LeastTresCharLargoI'm not
The house of Trotsky museum in Mexico City is legit
I actually visited it when I went to Mexico City.
Coyoacán, the place where it is, is amazingly beautiful.
Would blow that place up
@@yibithehispanic wtf is wrong
@@luxvenus Everything
I wonder what the war would have looked like. If he had taken power.
Gipsy Danger you should check out the alternate history hub video “what if Stalin never came to power”. It is probably the best answer to that what if scenario you’ll ever find.
@@martinfawkes595 he use the wrong photos.
Well if Trotsky was reinstalled into government before Operation Barbarossa, the Germans would never have gotten so close to Moscow and probably would never have reached Stalingrad.
@@Edax_Royeaux naah a year or 2 before maby and if the Purge never happened
@@julemandenudengaver4580 He'd never have gotten installed after a post-purge though.
If Trotsky had taken over and not Stalin.....one of the great “ifs”.....
@Joseph Melendez one of the reason why Germany was winning in the early war was because of the purge, and guess whose idea was it, Stalin
@Joseph Melendez like I said, the one of the main reason the Soviet got pushed back hard was because the complete lack of preparation and many of the officers were dead thus resulting in the lack of organization, the main reasons the Soviet won was because the German just didn't have enough resources to defeat the Soviet, and the encirclement in Stalingrad was just too much for Germany to handle, Stalin Paranoia caused the German to win in the early war, it was just after the Soviet recover from the purge the Soviet started winning
@Joseph Melendez nah, the people that got purged was not incompetent, Stalin were scared of them, the Soviet would be far better at fighting the German in the early war if the people that got purged are still alive, and the reason why the Soviet was caught of guard was because of, guess who, Stalin, he trusted Hitler too much, despite the western allies telling him that the German are going to invade soon, Stalin thought if Germany and Soviet are going to war, the Soviet will be at the offense, he was wrong
Ardy AF and you realize trotsky executes thousand and thousands of his own army in the civil war right?
There is no if, it would have been a communist hell hole as ALL communist countries become. We have had over 100 years of communism being tried and all we have to show for it is a death toll so high it may never be fully tallied. It's a failed evil system invented by a man who never had a job in his life and never actively participated in the system he hated there for knowing nothing of it.
You mix Finnish White guard with Russian White army.
Russian White army tried to free Tsar, not the finns..
If the finns had tried, they would have got it done.
Technically he is correct
Indeed, ristus notta!!
I wish they would clarify that the "ice pick" is an *"ice axe"* used for mountain climbing,
and not the type used to chip ice in the kitchen (that resembles a screw-driver).
I think most people hearing of an attack with an "ice pick" would think of a screw-driver, not a hand-axe.
Pezfeo exactly!
I was looking through the comments to see if anybody picked up on the error.
The specifics: Ice Axes have a long shaft of made of wood or metal ~45-60 cm (~2.5 feet) long with a sharp metal point on one end and a head with a narrow pick and sharp, slightly curved adze on the other.
The tool is used in alpine mountaineering. The pick or shaft is used to “self arrest” a fall that happens when climbing on a glacier or snowfield. The adze is used to cut foot & hand holds in ice or hard snow.
The pick side of the Ice Axe head is ~25 cm long at least 1 cm wide and 4 mm thick steel.
The pick that killed Trotsky was not a simple spike: It was a curved and hardened steel shaft attached to a long handle that the assassin swung at Trotsky’s head. It’s remarkable that Trotsky survived for any period of time.
Why an ice axe? There are three volcanos just south of Mexico City with summits that are much higher than 14,000 ft. Pico de Orizaba is 18,700 ft and it is the third highest peak in the Western Hemisphere.
I mean I just think of the Minecraft Pickaxe mining ice xD
When I hear pick I think of a pickaxe and not a chisel. Either way its said is fine.
Thank God someone knows
@@bones3439 'they were axed' 'bury the axe'
came from here?
The first four minutes of this summary of Trotsky’s life contain more political engagement than most people today display in their entire lives.
Imagine how the Soviet Union would have been if Trotsky had prevailed over Stalin
SiVlog
Edit: My blind pro-Trotsky argument was utter cringe, much like this entire comment section.
There was not that much of a difference between Stalin and Trotsky, each had good ideas and strategies, it’s just that Stalin was a lot more organised and concise. Neither were bad leaders.
ᏰĪᏝᏝ ՇÎρɧᏋƦ oof I felt that
@@cezarcatalin1406 trotsky
@@cezarcatalin1406 you forget that trotsky was an imperialist, so there also would have been incredible state control as well as countless more wars. Look up Trotskivite communism
@@cezarcatalin1406 Trotsky was an advocate for the world revolution so he would start world war himself.
Wow I was literally Googling him earlier and I thought "Im suprised they haven't done a Biographics about this guy yet"
It's Alexa, reading your mind! Invasion of privacy
They had a poll not too long about with trotskyist on it
What the hell is wrong with your neck?!
Calling doctor Meinhoff!
I once managed to convince a Trotskyist that Trotsky's last words were "is that an ice-pick in your pocket, or are you just pleased to see me?"
Yes
why and how
@@tflees Communists are stupid.
That flies they are normally very stupid
But why? Why would you do that?
0:45 - Chapter 1 - Beginnings
2:20 - Chapter 2 - Becoming a revolutionary
3:50 - Chapter 3 - Becoming Trotsky
5:40 - Chapter 4 - 1905 Revolution
7:05 - Chapter 5 - Pravda
8:15 - Chapter 6 - Deportations
9:35 - Mid roll ads
11:20 - Chapter 7 - The october revolution
12:25 - Chapter 8 - Pulling out of the war
14:05 - Chapter 9 - Civil war
16:15 - Chapter 10 - Stalin vs Trostky
17:45 - Chapter 11 - Banished
20:20 - Chapter 12 - Stalin's revenge
Do a video on Rosa Luxemburg.
Bernie sanders killed rosa Luxemburg
He done one on Rose from Luxembourg, will that do ?
@@ts-wo6pp
His ideological forefathers did. Along with elements that later became Nazis. Especially the triggerman who was later given an award by the Nazis after they assumed power.
@@jaysonbiggs8979 wdym Sanders is being immune to mortal worries such as "aging". He was directly involved with the assassination.
Jokes aside, didn't the social Democrats just hand it off to the brownshirts to do?
@@ts-wo6pp
No brownshirts at that time. It was the Freikorps. Who were decomissioned WWI right wing officers. Later to become part of the Brownshirts.
The Social Dems and Freikorps worked to kill her and Karl Leibkernecht.
Shot. She always said she wanted to die on the barricades fighting for revolution. Not the way she did.
Her shot body dumped in a river. Today there is a plaque to commemorate where the body was dumped in the river. Germans and people from around the world regularly visit the spot.
You managed to take Trotsky’s character in a very objective view as gray as it is not a monster or an angel just a man looking to have his place in this world
Or...a frustrated man child who couldn't live upto his Dad's expectations of him to be a provider, and like many Ashkenazi Jews fantasized and later instigated mass persecution of Slavic people.. especially Christians.
@@leeboy2k1 It always comes back to the daddy with Capitalists.
Trotsky, as Commissar of the Red Army was infamous for its “scorched earth” and “take no prisoners” tactics.
And not just with their enemies. On one occasion, in a Soviet planning meeting, the other members all disagreed with Trotsky’s argument, and were preparing to vote his proposal down. He reached under the desk, pulled out a sub-machine gun and shot the lot of them. Then noted his proposal down in the Minutes as having been approved “Nem Con”.
@@leeboy2k1 Yes we heard you christian capitalist manchild
Trotsky was never the monster in the Soviet Union that some in the West made him out to be. That was Stalin. Trotsky preferred moderation. He remained committed to the best and noble aspirations of communism, whereas Stalin opted for cruelty and used the people as cannon fodder and menial labor with no respect for the value of their lives.
The Cold War propaganda about Trotsky was ultimately somewhat unfair. He didn't do anything in the violent early years of Soviet civil war that other leaders would have to have done. Some of the stories of his violence are apocryphal, including the one mentioned here in this thread.
Condemn Stalin all you want. He deserves it.
Trotsky ... Not so much. If he had followed Lenin, the subsequent history of the USSR would probably have been very different. Certainly not perfect, but probably a little less nasty than stalinism.
Leon Trotsky.
The Snowball of Animal Farm.
Joseph Stalin.
The Napoleon of Animal Farm.
Vladimir Lenin/Karl Marx.
The Old Major of Animal Farm.
The author of the book, George Orwell was a Trotskyism follower, in both Animal Farm and '1984', he had Stalin and Trotsky written into the book. In Animal Farm, Napoleon was clearly the Joseph Stalin, Snowball was clearly Trotsky. While in '1984', the 'Big Brother' has been Stalin and the degenerated worker state as the party.
@@tersolarcells9656 Yes and It pisses me off when rightists use George Orwell to defend their own stance.
@@tersolarcells9656 he was a democratic socialist not a trotskyist. And as a libertarian i still STRONGLY admire orwell's stance against authoritarianism, even if im not a leftist
"You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you"
Trotsky
Soviet Russia meme
before it was cool
George Orwell used Trotsky as a model and inspiration for the characters of Snowball from “Animal Farm” and Emmanuel Goldstein from “1984.”
I wish I knew the debate between him and his wife. That seems like such an interesting conversation.
"Took Trotsky out of the picture!"
Dropped a hammer on you harder than I bitchslapped Hitler
*angry red man with brilliant moustache jumps from ceiling*
"I have no pride for you!"
Who ruined everything my revolution was doing to stop the bourgeoisie
@@moogoesacow1 I fought the bondage of classes!
Stalin went ⛏
SP1TF1RE
Stalin *Meets Lennin and Trotsky laughing
Stalin : What’s going on?
Trotsky : I told Lennin a joke.
Stalin: You want to hear a good one?
Trotsky: Sure
Stalin : Ice pick to the head.
Trotsky : I don’t get it.
Stalin : Not yet.
Peter Michalski
You are right and there was nothing wrong for you to Axe me that
^that pick emoji even looks like the cross he put next to your name. Most underrated comment here
@@danielfried4896 Trotsky's last words " I've been wooooshed."
Lenin was a pragmatist, Trotsky was an idealist, Stalin was a power-hungry opportunist.
Then there was Beria...
@@anngo4140 the bald dude
And Kruschev was the reformist and Gorbachev was the "tear down this wall!" uh........ ist!
@@hewhoshallnotbenamed5168 "tear down this wall!"ist, also known as secret neoliberal.
Trotsky was a bit dumb
I always appreciate how thorough and detailed these episodes are, yall clearly give your research it's due diligence with as little bias as possible! Thank you!
from the bolsje-wikipedia:
"The two factions were originally known as "hard" (Lenin's supporters) and "soft" (Martov's supporters), but the terminology soon changed to "Bolsheviks" and "Mensheviks", from the Russian bolshinstvo ("majority") and menshinstvo ("minority"). On the other hand, Martov's supporters won the vote concerning the question of party membership. Neither Lenin nor Martov had a firm majority throughout the Congress as delegates left or switched sides. At the end, the Congress was evenly split between the two factions. "
Lenin adopted the term 'majority', because 'hard' sounded bad. It refers to Lenin's proposed policy that would ensure a majority of orthodox communists in power ('a hard core') by strict ideological testing for party membership, while the Mensheviks, by advocating opening up membership, were allegedly jeopardizing this orthodoxy. It does not refer to any factual majority and Lenin ended democracy before any such facts could be established.
The Bolsjewiks were never the majority.
No, the Bolsheviks were in fact a majority in 1903, and it's common knowledge that that's where the name derives from and refers to. Obviously the situation changes within the RSDLP as time go on, and the names continues to stick even though within a few years they ceased to be two factions of the same party and become separate organizations. No point pretending there's something "dishonest" about the name.
"we are going to get to the very important October revolution, but, first, let me tell you about our sponsor" made me laugh really hard for some reason.
The juxtaposition of capitalism just before hitting the birth of communism as we know it. Your sense of humor is spot on.
@@jamesdykes517 should have been a pizza hut ad tbh
Stalin v. Trotsky. A theme which occurs over and over in history and legend. Able and Cain, Jacob and Esau, Romulus and Remus. Brothers in arms together and frequently against each other. Very archetypal.
Brother against Brother.
An Old Struggle. Maybe even Older than the Struggle of Oppressor and Oppressed.
I rage quit when he said that Trotsky created the first soviet. Soviets were a form of worker self-organization, they came “from below” from workers themselves and not from the plan of an intellectual. Bourgeois history gets so much wrong sometimes!
where did get that from . Lenin buried worker leaders as soon as he came to power .
"Bourgeois history" lmfao. Yeah, that's what gets things wrong, not a book which tries to devolve all of human history to a simple conflict of class...
But but but it wasnt real actual communism!
@Charlie121 rEaL cOmMunIsM HaSn’t bEeN tRied!
It's all just bastard Communism.
Honestly one of the most informative and interesting yt vids i have watched, you earned yourself a sub
Way back in school, i wish i had biographics in the palm of my hands. I studied History as one of my major subjects. I would have done 100 times better had I had Biographics at my fingertips. Thank-You Simon for a job well done. I sincerely enjoy brushing up on all the familiar names in history .
Trotsky: *exists*
Stalin: remove him from power
Trotsky: fled to Mexico and write essay criticising stalin
Stalin: *I'm gonna put an end to this man's career*
About to end this man's whole -career- *life*
He looked like an older version of Harry Potter.
An ice axe is a multi-purpose hiking and climbing tool used by mountaineers in both the ascent and descent of routes that involve snow, ice, or frozen conditions. Its use depends on the terrain: in its simplest role it is used like a walking stick, with the mountaineer holding the head in the center of their uphill hand. On steep terrain it is swung by its handle and embedded in snow or ice for security and an aid to traction. It can also be buried pick down, the rope tied around the shaft to form a secure anchor on which to bring up a second climber, or buried vertically to form a stomp belay. The adze is used to cut footholds, as well as scoop out compacted snow to bury the axe as a belay anchor.
The ice axe of today has its roots in the long-handled alpenstock that came before it. Not only is an ice axe used as a climbing aid, but also as a means of self-arrest in the event of a slip downhill.
Most ice axes meet design and manufacturing standards of organizations such as the Union Internationale des Associations d'Alpinisme (UIAA) or European Committee for Standardization (CEN). There are two classifications of ice axe, Basic (B/Type 1) and Technical (T/Type 2).
Basic ice axes are designed for use in snow conditions for general mountaineering, and are adequate for basic support and self-arrest. Technical ice axes, which may have curved shafts, are strong enough to be used for steep or vertical ice climbing and belaying on such ground.
Specialized scaled-down ice axes used for vertical ice climbing are known as ice tools. Ice tools have shorter and more curved shafts; stronger, sharper, and more curved replaceable picks, and often ergonomic grips and finger rests. Used in a pair, one is usually equipped with an adze for chipping and clearing snow whilst the other has a hammer to aid gear placement.
For ski mountaineering and racing, where weight is of paramount concern, manufacturers have produced short (~45 cm (18 in)) and light (200-300 g (7-11 oz)) ice axes. Some of these have aluminum alloy heads/picks which are unlikely to be as effective or robust as steel heads/picks.
An ice axe consists of at least five components:
Head - usually made of steel and featuring a pick and adze. A hole in the center is provided for attaching a wrist leash or carabiner.
Pick - the toothed pointed end of the head, typically slightly curved (aiding both in ergonomics and self-arrest).
Adze - the flat, wide end of the head used for chopping steps in hard snow and ice.
Hammer - the hammer is an alternative to the adze. May be used for aiding placement of protection.
Shaft - straight or slightly angled, typically wider front-to-back than side-to-side, flat on the sides and smoothly rounded on the ends. Traditional shafts were made of wood, but are now almost exclusively of lightweight metals (such as aluminum, titanium and steel alloys) or composites (including fiberglass, Kevlar or carbon filament).
Spike, or ferrule - a point at the base of the shaft used for balance and safety when the axe is held by its head in walking stick fashion. Usually made of steel.
Ice axe accessories include:
Leash - nylon webbing with an adjustable loop for securing the axe to hand. Often secured by a ring constrained to slide a limited distance on the shaft.
Leash stop - a rubber keeper or metal stud preventing the leash from slipping off of the ice axe.
Snow basket - similar to baskets on ski poles, temporarily mounted on the shaft close to the spike to keep the shaft from sinking into soft snow. Not at all common in Europe.
Pick and adze guard - a cover to protect from sharp edges and points when the axe is not being used.
Spike guard - a cover to protect from the sharp spike when the axe is not being used.
Ice-axe spike-to-head lengths used to generally range from 60-90 cm (24-35 in). This is just too short to be used as a walking stick on level ground (the way its forebearer, the 150-centimetre-long (5 ft) 19th century alpenstock, was), but is ergonomic when ascending steep slopes. For flatter ground, where consequences of a slip are not large, walking poles are more appropriate.
The old method to approximate the correct length of an ice axe was for the climber to hold the axe (spike facing the ground) at his/her side while standing relaxed. The spike of the ice axe should barely touch the ground when the climber stands fully upright holding the axe in this manner.[2] This may still be appropriate where the ice axe is to be used for travelling over relatively flat ground, perhaps, in the main, for glacier travel.
Modern mountaineers often carry shorter ice axes, 45-60 cm (18-24 in), for general use with any thing over 60 cm (24 in) being generally regarded as too large and unwieldy for chopping steps or climbing steep snow. A walking pole (providing a third point of contact), although stabilising and making a slip less likely, is unlikely to stop a fall.
The antecedent of the ice axe was the alpenstock, a long wooden pole with an iron spike tip, used by shepherds for travel on snowfields and glaciers in the Alps since the Middle Ages. On 8 August 1786, Jacques Balmat and Michel-Gabriel Paccard made the first ascent of Mont Blanc. Balmat, a chamois hunter and crystal collector, had experience with high mountain travel, and Paccard had made previous attempts to climb the peak. Illustrations show Balmat carrying two separate tools that would later be merged into the ice axe - an alpenstock (or baton) and a small axe that could be used to chop steps on icy slopes.
According to the earliest manufacturer of ice axes, Grivel, these two tools were merged to create the first true ice axe around 1840. Early ice axes had a vertical adze, with the cutting edge aligned with the direction of the shaft, as in a conventional axe. This design lasted until at least 1860, but eventually the adze was rotated to the current position, perpendicular to the direction of the shaft. The Italian Alpine Club published a book in 1889 entitled Fiorio e Ratti - The dangers of mountaineering and rules to avoid them, which recommended ice axes as among "the inseparable companions of the mountaineer".
In the late 19th century, the typical ice axe shaft measured 120-130 cm (47-51 in) in length. British climber Oscar Eckenstein started the trend toward shorter ice axes with a lighter model measuring 85-86 cm (33-34 in). Initially, this innovation was criticized by well-known climbers of the era, including Martin Conway, a prominent member of the Alpine Club, who was the leader of an early expedition to the Baltoro region near K2 in 1892 of which Eckenstein was a member.
Early ice axes had picks and adzes of about equal lengths. By the beginning of the 20th century, the pick lengthened to about twice the length of the adze. Improvements in crampon design (pioneered by Eckenstein in 1908) and ice climbing technique led to use of shorter, lighter ice axes appropriate to steeper ice climbs in the period between the world wars.
A famous rescue involving an ice axe took place during the Third American Karakoram Expedition to K2 in 1953. One of the climbers, Art Gilkey, was incapacitated by thrombophlebitis. The other climbers attempted to rescue him by lowering him down the mountain by rope, wrapped in a sleeping bag. While crossing a steep ice sheet, a slip caused Gilkey and five other climbers to begin falling down a steep slope. Climber Pete Schoening wedged his ice axe alongside a boulder, and managed to belay the roped climbers, saving their lives. (Gilkey, however, later in the same descent was swept away by an avalanche. Remains of his lost corpse were discovered in 1993.[9]) Schoening's ice axe is now on display at the Bradford Washburn American Mountaineering Museum in Golden, Colorado.
In 1966, Yvon Chouinard led a significant redesign of ice axes, working with initially reluctant manufacturer Charlet to develop a 55-centimetre-long (22 in) ice axe with a dramatically curved pick. Chouinard believed that "a curve compatible with the arc of the axe's swing would allow the pick to stay put better in the ice. I had noticed that a standard pick would often pop out when I placed my weight on it." Chouinard's idea worked and began a period of innovation in ice axe design.
In 1978, the Safety Commission of the Union Internationale des Associations d'Alpinisme (UIAA) established formal standards for ice axe safety and performance. This led to the replacement of the traditional wooden shaft by metal alloy shafts. Ergonomically curved handles became widespread in 1986. Use of modern aluminum alloys have led to a dramatic reduction in the weight of some ice axes. One model now on the market, the C.A.M.P. Corsa, weighs only 205 g (7.2 oz) with a 50-centimetre-long (20 in) shaft. One expert rated this lightweight ice axe as "ideal for low angle glacier travel" but said he "craved the solid and secure heft of a true steel mountain ax" in more demanding steep alpine conditions.
When not in use an ice axe is stored on the outside of a pack (rucksack). Many models come with a nylon webbing loop sewn on its rear base (off to one side to allow the pick to stay behind the hiker), together with a means to restrain its shaft. Rucksacks with attachment points for two ice axes are also available, popular in ice climbing where two tools are used.
Sorry I didn't catch that. What did you say?
Did anybody ask what an ice axe is?
Can you explain what an ice axe is in full paragraphs?
WTH! Man wrote a full textbook to explain something so simple, bloody Trotskyist !
History lost track of first wife by all accounts she ended up in a Labor camp and died in the late 1930's.
trotsky is the reason why i write fantasy novels instead of political commentaries
He was always Picked on by his friends.
And his friend Stalin picked on him the most.
Don't let that distract you from the fact that Trotsky had an identical twin named Steve Harrington.
@@MrGustaphe I taught that was colonel Sanders
I guess Stalin "picked" on him literally
hehehehe
Brilliant....THAT is what your channels are Simon!
They're quickly becoming THE big favourites of those that I subscribe to!
Looking forward to see many more videos! 👍🏻👌🏻👏🏻
He should do Pranks In Da Hood
lol
One of the best things about these videos is the way Simon mispronounces everything. Love it!
Biographic on Micheal Collins the Irish rebel and first commander and chief
Thumbs up for that as a fellow Corkonian))
4:50 quite the opposite. They wanted to impose a socialist state whereas communism is a stateless classless society. The idea of a transition directly to communism with no intermediary state is the main line of first international anarchists, and we know how the Bolsheviks felt about Anarchists...
"A man walked in and buried an ice pick etc." ? Thats a very unsatisfying description of the complex assasination story.
Wilhelm Reich is incredibly fascinating and would love to see a biographic on him.
Austrian doctor of medicine and psychoanalyst, a member of the second generation of analysts after Sigmund Freud. The author of several influential books which left Dr.Wilhelm Reich known as one of the most radical figures in the history of psychiatry.
“The great psychiatrist Wilhelm Reich once wrote, "No President, Academy, Court of Law, Congress or Senate on this earth has the knowledge or power to decide what will be the knowledge of tomorrow."
In 1957, the government of the United States of America jailed Dr. Reich and burned all of his published works. Wilhelm Reich in Hell provides a remarkable new look at the vilification and destruction of a great man who refused to bow to Gestapo tactics.”- Wilhelm Reich In Hell by Robert Anton Wilson 😇
Wasn't he also extremely enthusiastic about the "benefits" of having sex with children?
@@stevesheldon8616 Please provide a source for this sensationalist claim.
"Whatever happened to Leon Trotsky? He got an ice pick. That made his ears burn." Summed up by The Stranglers in 3 lines....
Almost as good as a potted History lesson as:
"Ra-Ra-Rasputin, lover of the Russian Queen. There was a cat who really was gone!" 😉
Rasputin was never Alexandra's lover. That was a rumor started by the aristocrats who didn't like her.
It's amazing that a century later, there's still so much bias and misinformation out there about Trotsky.
This video does a decent job, but when a topic is as controversial as this, one ought not to dance over the historical sources so lightly.
Trotsky was a strange almost ghostly Figure in History. He existed then he didn’t.
A number of inaccuracies:
He adopted the name Trotsky because it was the name of one of his guards during his first (or second) imprisonment.
The Bolshevik- Menshevik split was over what type of organization would lead a revolution. The big issue behind that was what type of revolution did Russia need.
There was no "communist newspaper" in the early 1900's. Because there was no communist party. No one called themselves communist. That title came around 1919. They called themselves Social Democrats.
His last words were actually directed at his followers: "Go forward."
I'm glad you guys made a video on Trotsky because I don't think a lot of people know about him.
I learned about him in 10th grade history class
Stalin: *exiles Trotsky for speaking against him*
Trotsky: I'LL FUCKING DO IT AGAIN
Bio on Louis Riel or Terry Fox? (Maybe even one on Sir John a Macdonald?) Awesome job Biographics
I'm guessing you're from Canada? I'm in favor of all 3, especially Louis Riel.
Can't help but agree
Yes my fellow canadian I agree.
Yes Louis Real would be interesting. Controversial.
Would love to see a source for your claim that the Finnish White Guard were the reason of the execution.
The White Guard of Finland were a wee bit busy consolidating in their own country. While some members of the Finnish whites did lead expeditions into Russian territory, it was mainly in Eastern Karelia.
The generally accepted theory for the order of the execution was the approaching Czechoslovak Legions, which had been asked by the Entente powers to attempt a rescue of the Imperial Family.
I have watched a dozen of your biographies....absolutely riveting
do Nikolai Bukharin the most overlooked Bolshevik!
Genrikh Yagoda screwed him
Bukharin was a rightist
@@Janik-pwoejrur by communist standards yes.
@@ziggyzap1 No, he would‘ve caused the restoration of capitalism with his politics
@@Janik-pwoejrur I don't believe a full restoration of capitalism, something similar to what China is now, is what I am thinking.
I would love to see a video on Emperor of Justinian and his restoration.
I'd second this! Or the general Belisarius, who was instrumental in the reconquest (and decimation) of much of the western Mediterranean.
@@andrewjacks2716 yes! That would be just as good.
@@andrewjacks2716 yeah, he's underrated
Followed by the one on Theodora
Sekhmet of Egypt unless and until Biographics covers Justinian, Extra Credits covered him in their Extra History series.
'How many times do you want to be deported'?
'Yes'
Would love to see one on John Carpenter and/or Wes Craven. Thank you sir, I learn a lot watching this channel
I swear y'all camp on this page. 3 minutes up and it already has 20+ comments
Mfundo Ndala the irony being that you’re one of the quick commenters.
I love to camp.
I do night shifts. I do camp here every evening
Very very informative. You have summed up Trotsky so that I know just enough and don't have to plough through literature as I would find that too hard going. So, thanks!
When you say "1909" at the 7:33 mark, there's a text popup that says "1908"
Which one is it?
A cynical phrase about revolutionaries comes to mind:
_The Revolution eats its children._
You are a fantastic narrator and presenter. Thumbs up!
Always interesting Simon. Always entertaining. Great research by the team and well written. Is there anything else worth watching other than Simon Whistler content? 🤔🤷🏻
Natasha has just come up to the window from the courtyard and opened it wider so that the air may enter more freely into my room. I can see the bright green strip of grass beneath the wall, and the clear blue sky above the wall, and sunlight everywhere. Life is beautiful. Let the future generations cleanse it of all evil, oppression and violence, and enjoy it to the full.
Leon Trotsky
Excellent clip. Quite a job of summation of Trotsky's life.
Quick correction: the Mensheviks actually had the majority of support at the convention where the bolsheviks and Mensheviks split. Lenin purposefully named his party the majority even though they had less support because he knew it would give his version of communism a rhetorical advantage and the Mensheviks foolishly went along with it. This is according to the biography of Lenin by Victor Sebestyen
No they never did. They lost the election and would of continued the war.
Do Frida Kahlo next
R D
What? Lol
Leon already DID her, lol.
Jay Saenz 🥵
I used to think Simon was just a list guy, but he is very knowledgeable and does a good job explaining history in a unbiased manner
He reads a script.
And there a tons of mistakes in the majority of them, but nobody who watches his videos is well researched in the topics so they just take his word for it and assume the research is good
Fair play, Trotsky was a double hard mofo.
You’ve only missed Ho Chi Min and Bakunin.While you’re at it, must we wait for Noam Chomsky to pass to celebrate him?
I’ve grown obsessed with Russian history, culture and Literature. If every biography I read about a Russian and they always read such literature. Then it must really mean something
Revolution...
I enjoy these presentations which is why I get so annoyed by the mistakes. Trotskty did not go into exile in Mexico with his son, but with his grandson who (if he's still alive) lives in Mexico until this day
Now you *have* to do a video on Frida Kahlo. With a separate one for Diego Rivera.
A Jackson Pollock video would be lovely too. Along with one on the French Painter Manet (and no commenters, that's not a typo for Monet).
*The Permanent Revolution* One of his greatest books. It's a book that explains with details how Stalin betrayed the Proletariat state that was raised after the triumph of the revolution.
Another great reference is the Latin American trotskyist Nahuel Moreno. Specially his work *Revolutions of the XX century*
Lenin wasn't the *founder* of Russian Marxism, Plekhanov was
That's even true Christina O. But that's not useful to know. Because variations of Lenin-Marxists at the time thought it was twisted to know that half the Russian Soviets didn't want Stalin to win the war on the starvation to freedom which continued to escalade throughout the first time Hitler died. So are you suggesting that Lenin didn't forge what was to create an empire just because a Plekhanov or a mongrel didn't believe that Russia had a backbone to believe in freedom. That was also being forged.
What???
Bot?
Trotsky. The man who could have saved the communist dream, but instead ... We got Stalin.
Trotsky. The man behind gulag, holodomor and in general christian genocides on the former Russian Empire lands
@@MineTuber Gulag and Holodomor were not because of Trostky(Holodomor happened under Stalin),he was responsible for allot of death yes this true,like all people in Russian Civil war.Btw even without being Cummunist,he is a man that single handley changed the entire history of the world not even once but twice and btw loved by most people at the time(in Saint Petersburg and Army especially)because of his bravery and hard work.
Thanks brilliant. And thanks Simon. I never would have found brilliant without you!
I'm gonna come back every time you guys post a new video, just to comment that I would like to see one done on Terence McKenna. Thank you for your time.
Ok. You've mentioned Frida Kahlo in this video. Now, can you do her very interesting life? Similar names you can touch on from the USSR include Semyon Budyonny, Nikolai Yezhov, and Felix Dzerzhinsky,
"We request clarification of this misunderstanding" or "Yo, WTF?"
more like: "guys, we did an oppsie, peace please"
The Bolsheviks were actually the minority party and the Mensheviks the majority, although their names mean literally the opposite.
Towards the end, yes. But when the parties were formed in 1903 and for almost all of the period up to the October Revolution afterwards, that was the case.
The Bolsheviks' rise in mid-1917 was very rapid and fuelled partly by vast sums of money spent on them by Imperial Germany.
Any idea about possibly bringing these out as podcasts?
there are ways to convert youtube videos into mp3 yourself...
I would LOVE a Frida Kahlo video! Great content as always!
Have you done a video on William Wallace? If not, that might be worth a go :)
Willium wallace is difficult to research as most of it is heavily biased and not based on fact
Good news: Simon and the gang does now!
Can you please do one on the Swamp Fox (Francis Marion)?
@@thehylian6984 me too :-( but I consider myself a New Yorker since moving here. New York feels so natural to me :-)
Lmao he was critical even when he had an ice pick in his head
I follow many of your channels, Simon. And alongside Visual..., Biographics may be your finest work. Perfect length to delve into the material but not get lost in the forest for the trees; quite balanced, and well-sourced. And you’re an excellent presenter.
You should do Wayne Wheeler next! He was the man who orchestrated prohibition.
World History, The Universe and Prehistoric Topics are the best things to watch on YT
There is nothing more admirable, or indeed more dangerous, than a man who fully commits himself to something
Except he never was committed to Communism, only to himself.
Study more. The guy was a total fraud who sold the world a fantasy version of himself because he lacked the guts to get his hands dirty and actually "do the work" like Lenin and Stalin.
Of the three (Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky), Trotsky could be considered the most reasonable.
But Trotsky is a Masochist
No, Stalin was the best
Sarcasm ?
Two power hungry sociopaths and a ideological zealot.
On a scale of 1 to 10 for reasonability they all score a banana
I don't think I would use the word 'reasonable' to describe ANY of them!
great video man , more time on images of the time and story would be sweet !