Vintage Casio A168WG-9EF vs A168WEGM-9EF

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 ноя 2024

Комментарии •

  • @alessandrooliveira7715
    @alessandrooliveira7715 3 года назад +8

    Relógios muito bonitos 🤩

  • @fortunatejeremy
    @fortunatejeremy 8 месяцев назад

    The gold background on the digital part looks good. Is that one vintage, or "vintage?"

  • @whydoyoucarexd
    @whydoyoucarexd 2 года назад +2

    What are the differences and what’s the light colour of the first one?

  • @sellsidedream8766
    @sellsidedream8766 4 года назад +4

    which is better looks like the A168WEGM-9EF is the better one to buy ???

    • @stefan_4508
      @stefan_4508 2 года назад

      Fuck no that one looks putrid

  • @flaviojosecaixeta3859
    @flaviojosecaixeta3859 3 года назад +1

    estou na duvida de qual comprar dos 2 poderia mi ajudar.....

    • @rtaipina
      @rtaipina  3 года назад +1

      Bom dia
      A qualidade é a mesma .
      Terá de escolher a seu gosto.

  • @o.fuentes5958
    @o.fuentes5958 4 года назад +21

    New models come with the insede of the belt in silver, a fail from Casio.

    • @rtaipina
      @rtaipina  4 года назад

      Yes they are original

    • @johncastro1759
      @johncastro1759 2 года назад +3

      @@NAIRxtc noo. Theyre not fake. It depends on when ans where they came out. But most new ones are silver inside the strap

  • @HimanshuChintalapudi
    @HimanshuChintalapudi 3 года назад +2

    hi, why do some Casio A168WG-9EF models have uncoated or silver on the underside of the bracelet? Are they fake?

    • @erictodoran8664
      @erictodoran8664 3 года назад +1

      No they’re not fake. It’s just how they are (at least from what I know)

    • @caravaggio495
      @caravaggio495 2 года назад +1

      Fake amazon crap

    • @perfectenrager
      @perfectenrager 11 месяцев назад

      @@caravaggio495no some casios are not gold plated underneath the bracelet and they are still original.

  • @RahulRai-xo6jd
    @RahulRai-xo6jd 4 года назад +3

    What's the difference between two.
    ?

    • @manuelmaneful7jimenez780
      @manuelmaneful7jimenez780 3 года назад

      In the mirro

    • @johncastro1759
      @johncastro1759 2 года назад

      Watch the video and pay close attention. Its obvious on the face of the watch

    • @mianrowan
      @mianrowan 2 года назад +3

      One has electroluminence the other has the shitty backlight

    • @casiogt4923
      @casiogt4923 Год назад

      also first one have mineral glass, second one have acryl glass.

  • @VijayChintapandu
    @VijayChintapandu Год назад

    the back night background light is different.

  • @IshitaSaha055
    @IshitaSaha055 4 года назад

    Price please both watches

  • @mduzzal6653
    @mduzzal6653 6 месяцев назад

    Ki vave nebo

  • @LondonCasual90
    @LondonCasual90 3 года назад +2

    Both the same size?

    • @rtaipina
      @rtaipina  3 года назад

      Yes :)

    • @LondonCasual90
      @LondonCasual90 3 года назад +1

      I had A168WEGM-9EF but I lost it and now can only find A168WG-9EF on shops 😢

  • @studyhards-p4x231
    @studyhards-p4x231 4 года назад +2

    simple is best

  • @6k4im64h
    @6k4im64h Год назад

    i prefer 168wegm

  • @caravaggio495
    @caravaggio495 2 года назад +1

    Fake

    • @rtaipina
      @rtaipina  2 года назад

      Not Fake
      Why do you say that?

    • @caravaggio495
      @caravaggio495 2 года назад +1

      The strap on the inside on the original one is silver, not gold , the gold coded inside are not original

    • @rtaipina
      @rtaipina  2 года назад +6

      @@caravaggio495 sorry but you are wrong

    • @bery7028
      @bery7028 Год назад

      @@caravaggio495 idiot

    • @i_read_bad_reviews
      @i_read_bad_reviews Год назад

      @@caravaggio495they make both. The gold inside is $30 more.