I upgrade 1600 to 5600x the performance different in newer game is nearly double but for older game is not much difference.For office n RUclips not much different between both.A good thing I m using b350 😅
There should be difference in everything, even speed of opening documents in office should be about 30% faster. Maybe your disk drive is the bottleneck?
@@MrChonkers Drive speed really only affects how quickly applications can load data in. It's definitely weird that there's no difference in older games though, usually that's where you're CPU bound because you're already pushing big framerates, and a new CPU just pushes them further.
Went from an Rx570 4GB and R5 2600 to an Rx 600 8GB and R5 3600x at 4.5Ghz. Gained like 30 frames in battlefield 2042 and 1% went from about 30 to 45. The 6600 is OCed as well
@@2km223frame times can be a big issue on cards that only have 8 pcie-4 lanes like the 6500 and 6600. I believe cards like the 6700/6800 etc that use 16 pcie-4 lanes would be fine on a pcie-3 board as it will still utilize all 16 lanes whereas the cards that only use 8 lanes for pcie-4 will still only use 8 lanes for pcie-3. Some games like uncharted have shown noticeable issues with this but a lot of older games would do just fine
One of the best benchmark videos on youtube. This one and the previous one - with the 8-core CPUs, are comparable side by side, with the same tests and settings.
I got both 3600 and 5600X in two pc's respectively and I must say I'm very pleased with them, they perform really well. The only mistake I did with the 3600 at the begining was to build it with the cheapest low model Tuf Gaming motherboard which did not performed as i expected, so now and learned from that mistake got both processors with Rog Strix motherboards and they are amazing.
To be honest all the mobos are kinda the same, as long as it doesn't have a very very bad power management capabilities and enough ports for the things you want your PC. All other things are just fanshy rgbs and good looking bios menu.
@@sifatalam1188 They both perform very well, but if you want max performance go the 5600X wich I use only for gaming. The 3600 was my first pc build back in the day and I use it for multi-task (work and gaming), with a decent graphic card the 3600 will let you play anything, same with the 5600X but with this one you need a tier card to get best out of it. Here's how I got my rigs set up For the 3600 its got a 32gb DDR4 2400mhz+Rog Strix B450F Gaming+SSD M.2 1tb+GTX1660S+750W plus+Arctic A35 cooler. For the 5600X its got 64gb DDR4 3400mhz+Rog Strix B450F Gaming II+SSD M.2 2tb+Rog Strix RTX3060Ti+800W plus+Arctic A35 cooler. Depending on your budget both cpu will perform but your graphic card will do a lot more to get the max performance, hope this helps.
Hmm, your "cheapest low model Tuf Gaming motherboard" was still probably TWICE as expensive than my CHEAPEAST AM4 motherboard that still had OC capabilities. I bought an AsRock with a B350 chipset several years ago for my R1600 for about 50€! Never had issues! But I did big research to get the best for my buck. Your problem is not "the cheapest Tuf mb" and replacing it with even moar expensive ROG mb! 😬💸💸 It's most likely that ur Tuf mb probably had A520 chipset which does NOT support overclocking, a B550 chipset mb does! Protip: Don't buy based on brands, buy based on the chipset/features u need, then choose the cheapest that seems solid enough. For example, my AsRock had better power management than most other cheap boards, that's why I chose it. And why are u having that 3600 with 32gb at 2400mhz? Surely that board can run the mems much faster?
Nice comparison! 5600 is a beast, no doubt, and 3600 is great, too. But there's no need to feel bad if still rocking a 2600 or 1600 as everything remains quite playable. Especially true if it's appropriately-paired with a mid-range gpu, like a 3060, for normal gaming on a 1080p/60hz or 75hz monitor.
@@hyperhighdrosis upgraded from gtx 1060 to 3060ti with the 1600 and saw a massive difference, double the fps.. its true tho the 1600 will definitely bottleneck newer cpus i just upgraded to the 5600x and saw another pretty substantial jump in fps
Yup lots of people still using 1600s they still handle all games pre 2020 if using a mid range gpu. If people don’t play new aaa games or if they stick to only a few games there’s no point in upgrading you’d just be wasting money
i use 2600 and it's absolutely fine. It bottlenecks my GPU a bit sometimes, but i still have playable FPS so not a big deal for me. I overclocked it to 4.1GHz and it helped massively with the bottleneck.
@@MarwanMahdy gpu bottlenecks are irrelevant cause they dont make the gamelpay cancerous unless it's turbo weak. if it can pull 60 its fine. worst case scenario fsr on low settings to get 100+ fps
NjTech please do the same test with the Ryzen 7 series. R7 1800X R7 2700X R7 3800X R7 5700X R7 5800X my cpu R7 5800X3D NjTech the best testing channel ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ I recently bought the Ryzen 7 5800X. and I didn't even have time to use it in games 😟
Почти год назад спулил свой 1600 и поменял на 11400, и знаете, даже с 1070 ощутимая прибавка в стабильности и частоте кадров. Но все же в свое время поддержал АМД ввиду возможно светлого будущего в плане конкуренции и вот оно настало))
Все игруни по разному грузят систему. Что-то больше видяху, что-то проц. Попробуй например вартандер или Бэтмена с оверлеем афтербернера запустить и гля на скок % у тя видяха нагружена. И просадки 1% тоже смотреть надо, ибо микрофризы бесят. Тем более ща когда 5600 без Х всего 10к стоит... Хотя если только в танчушки на 60герцовом монике рубать то вообще побую.
@@quelpazzo. wrong, its not trash. It will still handle any game pre 2020 and in it’s time. You mean after time it starts becoming out of date. To call tech trash is just dumb, it just gets outdated with newer tech.
@@csowner2048 especially when talking in pc space technology wise. look at ada lovelace nvidia's 4000 architecture. 4090 brutally murdering 3090ti at the same price
1600 at that time was a beast and perfect competitor for i5 9th gen... And for tht cpu benchmarking with 3080 or 3060 doesn't make any sense... Use them with max GTX1070 or RX590
it makes sense for a benchmark. You don't want to use a weak GPU to benchmark CPUs as the gpu will be the bottleneck and thus the full potential of the cpu itself will be limited by a weak gpu. You go overkill with the GPU in benchmarks so you know the full potential of a CPU compared to another CPU. This video is to compare CPUs relative difference.
I upgrade 1600 to 5600x the performance different in newer game is nearly double but for older game is not much difference.For office n RUclips not much different between both.A good thing I m using b350 😅
Hei sir 5600x still compatible with b350m?
@@fadly51my board compatible update bios then can use already.U have to check yr motherboard support webpage see is it supported or not
@@fadly51 Yep, you'll probably need to get a BIOS update from whoever made your motherboard.
There should be difference in everything, even speed of opening documents in office should be about 30% faster. Maybe your disk drive is the bottleneck?
@@MrChonkers Drive speed really only affects how quickly applications can load data in. It's definitely weird that there's no difference in older games though, usually that's where you're CPU bound because you're already pushing big framerates, and a new CPU just pushes them further.
Went from an Rx570 4GB and R5 2600 to an Rx 600 8GB and R5 3600x at 4.5Ghz. Gained like 30 frames in battlefield 2042 and 1% went from about 30 to 45. The 6600 is OCed as well
What motherboard do you use? Does Rx 6600 work fine on PCIe 3.0?
@@2km223frame times can be a big issue on cards that only have 8 pcie-4 lanes like the 6500 and 6600. I believe cards like the 6700/6800 etc that use 16 pcie-4 lanes would be fine on a pcie-3 board as it will still utilize all 16 lanes whereas the cards that only use 8 lanes for pcie-4 will still only use 8 lanes for pcie-3. Some games like uncharted have shown noticeable issues with this but a lot of older games would do just fine
@@CamoKKing thanks for the info
The difference between 1600 and 3600 was a steal honestly.
One of the best benchmark videos on youtube. This one and the previous one - with the 8-core CPUs, are comparable side by side, with the same tests and settings.
I got both 3600 and 5600X in two pc's respectively and I must say I'm very pleased with them, they perform really well. The only mistake I did with the 3600 at the begining was to build it with the cheapest low model Tuf Gaming motherboard which did not performed as i expected, so now and learned from that mistake got both processors with Rog Strix motherboards and they are amazing.
Which one is better between 3600 and 5600x
To be honest all the mobos are kinda the same, as long as it doesn't have a very very bad power management capabilities and enough ports for the things you want your PC.
All other things are just fanshy rgbs and good looking bios menu.
@@sifatalam1188 They both perform very well, but if you want max performance go the 5600X wich I use only for gaming. The 3600 was my first pc build back in the day and I use it for multi-task (work and gaming), with a decent graphic card the 3600 will let you play anything, same with the 5600X but with this one you need a tier card to get best out of it. Here's how I got my rigs set up
For the 3600 its got a 32gb DDR4 2400mhz+Rog Strix B450F Gaming+SSD M.2 1tb+GTX1660S+750W plus+Arctic A35 cooler.
For the 5600X its got 64gb DDR4 3400mhz+Rog Strix B450F Gaming II+SSD M.2 2tb+Rog Strix RTX3060Ti+800W plus+Arctic A35 cooler.
Depending on your budget both cpu will perform but your graphic card will do a lot more to get the max performance, hope this helps.
Mobos itself don’t give your pc any speed. It’s the ports and slots that allow fast hardware such as cpu and gpus. Most are the same
Hmm, your "cheapest low model Tuf Gaming motherboard" was still probably TWICE as expensive than my CHEAPEAST AM4 motherboard that still had OC capabilities. I bought an AsRock with a B350 chipset several years ago for my R1600 for about 50€! Never had issues! But I did big research to get the best for my buck. Your problem is not "the cheapest Tuf mb" and replacing it with even moar expensive ROG mb! 😬💸💸 It's most likely that ur Tuf mb probably had A520 chipset which does NOT support overclocking, a B550 chipset mb does!
Protip: Don't buy based on brands, buy based on the chipset/features u need, then choose the cheapest that seems solid enough. For example, my AsRock had better power management than most other cheap boards, that's why I chose it.
And why are u having that 3600 with 32gb at 2400mhz? Surely that board can run the mems much faster?
Nice comparison! 5600 is a beast, no doubt, and 3600 is great, too. But there's no need to feel bad if still rocking a 2600 or 1600 as everything remains quite playable. Especially true if it's appropriately-paired with a mid-range gpu, like a 3060, for normal gaming on a 1080p/60hz or 75hz monitor.
1600af rocks but not for Escape from Tarkov :D
@@hyperhighdrosis upgraded from gtx 1060 to 3060ti with the 1600 and saw a massive difference, double the fps.. its true tho the 1600 will definitely bottleneck newer cpus i just upgraded to the 5600x and saw another pretty substantial jump in fps
Yup lots of people still using 1600s they still handle all games pre 2020 if using a mid range gpu. If people don’t play new aaa games or if they stick to only a few games there’s no point in upgrading you’d just be wasting money
i use 2600 and it's absolutely fine. It bottlenecks my GPU a bit sometimes, but i still have playable FPS so not a big deal for me. I overclocked it to 4.1GHz and it helped massively with the bottleneck.
i would rly know wat r5 1600 you used. The R5 1600 AF or THe R5 1600 AE (Zen vs Zen+)
After 3 generations almost double fps, wow
Hopefully you'll update it again and a few weeks when the 7600x comes out
I'll update..
I would love to see the difference between 2600 and 5600 with weaker gpu such as 1070
probably no difference since the 1070 will be the bottleneck
@@MarwanMahdy gpu bottlenecks are irrelevant cause they dont make the gamelpay cancerous unless it's turbo weak. if it can pull 60 its fine. worst case scenario fsr on low settings to get 100+ fps
NjTech please do the same test with the Ryzen 7 series.
R7 1800X
R7 2700X
R7 3800X
R7 5700X
R7 5800X my cpu
R7 5800X3D
NjTech the best testing channel
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
I recently bought the Ryzen 7 5800X. and I didn't even have time to use it in games 😟
I have new motherboard Asrock B450m-hdv R4.0 with bios version P.740, can i use Ryzen 5 1600 in this bios? Answer please
it supports 1600 (asrock website, i was on it when i saw your question). it is better to upgrade to the latest bios to fix uefi vulnerabilities...
@@elwing1750 i can use 1600 sir.. my default bios is P7.40 version from the asrock b450m-hdv R4.0 rev3.
Почти год назад спулил свой 1600 и поменял на 11400, и знаете, даже с 1070 ощутимая прибавка в стабильности и частоте кадров. Но все же в свое время поддержал АМД ввиду возможно светлого будущего в плане конкуренции и вот оно настало))
Very Nice Bro Keep It Up
1600AE 14nm
1600AF 12nm
Nice 👍
funny how my 1600af oc 3.7ghz gets worse frames then the 1600 here
En overclock?
Good comparison
Thank you, but RDR2?
Umm the 5600x came out in November 2020, it's two years old now.. is this just the non-x chip?
yes
Выводы:
Ryzen 1600 в разгоне 3.9 ГГц для всего сейчас хватает)юзаю в паре 2060super
Все игруни по разному грузят систему. Что-то больше видяху, что-то проц. Попробуй например вартандер или Бэтмена с оверлеем афтербернера запустить и гля на скок % у тя видяха нагружена. И просадки 1% тоже смотреть надо, ибо микрофризы бесят. Тем более ща когда 5600 без Х всего 10к стоит... Хотя если только в танчушки на 60герцовом монике рубать то вообще побую.
It's not enough to reach 144fps in apex or battlefield V whatever graphic you using
low graphic...do you realy using cpu like that?
AMD win
extraño las canciones de TheFatRat que ponían antes
The Best
Where's R5 4600?
Only 4600g
Its crap, just like 5500...
Where's 4600?
Probably it sits between 3600 and 5600 hehe 10-15% less score of 5600
in the bin
5600 is the best AMD CPU ever manufactured, right up there with the 1600 AF.
the 1600 af is kinda trash icl, had it for two years it bottlenecked even my old rx580
@@quelpazzo. wrong, its not trash. It will still handle any game pre 2020 and in it’s time. You mean after time it starts becoming out of date. To call tech trash is just dumb, it just gets outdated with newer tech.
@@csowner2048 especially when talking in pc space technology wise. look at ada lovelace nvidia's 4000 architecture. 4090 brutally murdering 3090ti at the same price
🤯
1600 at that time was a beast and perfect competitor for i5 9th gen... And for tht cpu benchmarking with 3080 or 3060 doesn't make any sense... Use them with max GTX1070 or RX590
it makes sense for a benchmark. You don't want to use a weak GPU to benchmark CPUs as the gpu will be the bottleneck and thus the full potential of the cpu itself will be limited by a weak gpu.
You go overkill with the GPU in benchmarks so you know the full potential of a CPU compared to another CPU. This video is to compare CPUs relative difference.
And the 1600 still is a great cpu, you don’t even need to upgrade unless you play newer titles
@@csowner2048 I'm playing everything with 1600 and RX 580
Bottleneck sir
Fake!!!