Building Mechanical Advantage (3:1 or 5:1)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 янв 2023
  • Instructor Dwayne Neustaeter demonstrates a technique for the installation of mechanical advantage. This technique is most often employed in urban forestry for the use of pulling over trees. However when applied appropriately MA can be used to meet many different objectives. As spider man says... "with great power, comes great responsibility". Enjoy and remember Stay Safe and In Control!

Комментарии • 47

  • @stacysmeader6228
    @stacysmeader6228 6 месяцев назад +7

    Clean, precise tutorial.
    No rambling on.
    Clear angles on the videoing.
    Very good job.

  • @eamonodonnell8821
    @eamonodonnell8821 7 месяцев назад +3

    By far the best set up for mechanical advantage that I’ve seen on RUclips, thank you very much for your concise explanation and set up!

  • @JustMe-dv5ix
    @JustMe-dv5ix 7 месяцев назад +3

    Dog gone, you know your stuff, very rare to see on youtube. Thank you.

  • @brianfoley4328
    @brianfoley4328 Год назад +17

    Absolutely the best explanation and easiest to follow demonstration of mechanical advantage I've ever seen...this the "How to do it" video. Well done Sir, well done indeed.

  • @samday6621
    @samday6621 7 месяцев назад +2

    Well and succinctly explained. 👍🏼
    Thank you.

  • @ss229er7
    @ss229er7 Месяц назад

    Fantastic instruction! Thanks.

  • @Dave-oh2sv
    @Dave-oh2sv 2 месяца назад

    Outstanding breakdown

  • @north61
    @north61 Год назад +6

    Absolutely excellent presentation!

  • @CFWaittoleave
    @CFWaittoleave 4 месяца назад

    Outstanding as the other commenters said. You’re the boss.

  • @MallableYT
    @MallableYT 6 месяцев назад

    Anyone not talking about how jacked the instructor is? The trees fall over for this dude. Knots tie themselves to the rope.

  • @urbanlumberjack
    @urbanlumberjack Год назад +1

    Fantastic. I love and am fascinated by all things rope, mechanical advantage, and nots. This stuff is the bomb

    • @jimmy66603
      @jimmy66603 2 месяца назад

      😊💪👌
      "It's better to know a knot and not need it, than need a knot and not know it"

  • @bojangles5378
    @bojangles5378 Год назад +2

    Nice job on this helpful video!

  • @mikebarbier1519
    @mikebarbier1519 Месяц назад

    This dude knows his shit

  • @samuelsnowbarger2052
    @samuelsnowbarger2052 Год назад +1

    Thank you so much for this!

  • @andrasnemeth6659
    @andrasnemeth6659 Год назад

    Nice and informative video. Thanks!

  • @timwatsonphotography
    @timwatsonphotography 5 месяцев назад

    Excellent video. Thank you very much.

  • @stereothrilla8374
    @stereothrilla8374 Год назад +2

    Best explanation a straight forward setup that I’ve seen for a primitive progress capture/mechanical advantage system. Glad you didn’t build it with more expensive fancy devices like tooth cams. Also, it’s a good idea to use pieces manufactured from Technora or some other heat resistant material at your prusik points as these contact points with your main rope can become high friction points that may be prone to melting with nylon pieces. It’s not a problem with the rope as a different points of the rope are always moving through however the prusik points are seeing constant friction. This would apply more with hauling, moving a large object and less with taking the tree down as you shouldn’t have to put a lot of rope through the system before the line is taught.

    • @HollywoodNeuy
      @HollywoodNeuy Год назад +2

      Thanks, that's excellent feedback 😀 👍

    • @stereothrilla8374
      @stereothrilla8374 Год назад +1

      @@HollywoodNeuy thank you for the awesome information. I appreciate you.

    • @HollywoodNeuy
      @HollywoodNeuy Год назад

      Thanks 😊

  • @catlandstraysandferals2844
    @catlandstraysandferals2844 Год назад +3

    VERY INFORMITIVE !!

  • @FallLineJP
    @FallLineJP Год назад +2

    Great video! Very clearly explained.
    Worth keeping in mind that pulleys are not perfect so a 3:1 will actually give you less than the ideal 3x multiplier and this loss of efficiency gets more pronounced with higher pulley ratio.
    Would be fun to see a demonstration with a linescale or something similar. Cheers!

    • @HollywoodNeuy
      @HollywoodNeuy Год назад +2

      Yes, you are correct. Thanks for your feedback.

  • @morinkashi63
    @morinkashi63 Год назад +1

    Could you please tell me where I can buy those pulleys sir.

  • @assassinlexx1993
    @assassinlexx1993 Год назад

    I wonder if this could be used for lifting a heavy load?
    Not having to worry about the load dropping if the rope slips from your hand

    • @HollywoodNeuy
      @HollywoodNeuy Год назад +1

      Absolutely, it would within reason, of course.

  • @androopr
    @androopr 7 месяцев назад

    Bubbles from trailer park boys is a good arborist

  • @pdloder
    @pdloder Год назад +13

    If you weigh 200lb and you're pulling sideways you're not putting 200lb of force on that rope.

    • @HollywoodNeuy
      @HollywoodNeuy Год назад +12

      True 👍 there are many variabls and assumptions made in these calculations, and it is more the concept that is being explained, not the technicalities. Thank you for your astute observation.

    • @trailjockeytj6160
      @trailjockeytj6160 Год назад +11

      At 200 pounds you could potentially pull more than your weight if your feet are chalked. It then comes down to your dead lift, most people can dead lift over their body weight so therefore you would pull more than your 200 pounds of body weight

    • @pdloder
      @pdloder Год назад +2

      @@trailjockeytj6160 If you're dead-lifting sideways - I think you're doing it wrong.

    • @brotherlove100
      @brotherlove100 Год назад

      true story. I guess you could run a redirect back to the anchor tree higher up and add a footloop to the woring end to just stand up in it

    • @Zogg1281
      @Zogg1281 Год назад +4

      I've seen this done using a force gauge..... thingy and the guy managed more then his own body weight in a straight up pull. He's got a great channel "HowNot2" all about pretty much everything rope related. Also, if you can only pull your own body weight, explain the World's Strongest Man comp where they've pulled lorries, as well as passenger jets. The human body can do more then people realise, you just need to be open to the possibility 😊

  • @bwillan
    @bwillan Год назад

    Never heard the term french prussic before. What you showed, I know as a Kleimheist. I suspect it is just different terminology for the same thing.

    • @HollywoodNeuy
      @HollywoodNeuy Год назад

      The kliemhiest is different than the French Prussic, of which there are multiple names for and configurations... such as Valdatain Tresse, or Machaud Tresse. I'm sure the spelling 🤔 on those is wrong.

    • @detroydetroy
      @detroydetroy Год назад

      @@HollywoodNeuy i know it as the machard knot, it's curious the variations in names depending on the country jajajajajaj

  • @Metalandwoods_longlostdentures
    @Metalandwoods_longlostdentures Год назад +1

    3:1 or 5:1 is NEVER 3x or 5x the input….

    • @HollywoodNeuy
      @HollywoodNeuy Год назад +1

      Correct.

    • @johnward536
      @johnward536 7 месяцев назад

      @@HollywoodNeuy real mechanical advantage is 4::1 not 5:1 to caculate you only need count the number of ropes that are shortened.

  • @utar88utar
    @utar88utar Год назад +1

    that's wild... in a good sense ofc ;)

  • @nilsmartschin593
    @nilsmartschin593 8 месяцев назад

    Kein Interesse an gesperrten Kanälen 💩💩💩💩👎👎👎👎👎