For more similar problems like the above, check out: 1. www.math.upenn.edu/~mmerling/math107%20docs/practice%20on%20Bayes%20solutions.pdf 2. gtribello.github.io/mathNET/bayes-theorem-problems.html 3. wwwf.imperial.ac.uk/~ayoung/m2s1/WorkedExamples1.pdf
No. Since your got interviewed and also think you did well in the first round, 95 is the numerator as only 95 people are called for second interview and also think they did well in the first interview.
For more similar problems like the above, check out:
1. www.math.upenn.edu/~mmerling/math107%20docs/practice%20on%20Bayes%20solutions.pdf
2. gtribello.github.io/mathNET/bayes-theorem-problems.html
3. wwwf.imperial.ac.uk/~ayoung/m2s1/WorkedExamples1.pdf
Thank you so much for your clear explanation it defiantly helps to tackle similar problems and also thankful for providing resources to practice.
It is really helpful sir!..Thankyou
It was just a Bayes Theorem problem.
Yes, that’s true. But, almost 90% of candidates can’t solve this if you twist it a little.
Super sir I am very interesting to learn appied ai
Thanks for the video
Basic Bayes problem.
Yes, it is.
Sir it should supposed to be 100/(95+75) right?
Why because total people attended second interview is 100 right ?
No. Since your got interviewed and also think you did well in the first round, 95 is the numerator as only 95 people are called for second interview and also think they did well in the first interview.
cool I got it, even I took 200 people as example
That's a method we also like as it solves the question from more foundational concepts instead of using formulae.
Thank you
Sir ur teching videos monday to Friday or Saturday day and sunday.
Our live sessions are only on Sundays. You can watch the videos on any day.