Aircraft Carrier Air Defense System Shooting Down Missiles, Jets - Su-34 - C-RAM CIWS - Simulation

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 ноя 2021
  • [Zone 3000] Aircraft Carrier Air Defense System Shooting Down Missiles, Hostile Jets Su-34 - C-RAM CIWS in Action
    This video is a simulation.
    Minimum required PC configuration for running simulations (previously used setup):
    Graphics Card:amzn.to/45A8umy
    CPU:amzn.to/47NV9cu
    Good value for money!
    Current dedicated PC configuration that I am using:
    Graphics Card:amzn.to/3YHFXJu
    CPU:amzn.to/44kL8QN
    ※All of this is based on my actual usage experience. If you're interested in simulations, feel free to take it as a reference. It's also great for running the latest games smoothly. Thank you for your questions and comments~!
    Subscribe for more videos: bit.ly/3m4yy5w
    I love to make military simulation videos. I hope you enjoy!
    If you're reading this and enjoyed the video please leave a like & remember to subscribe!
    Thanks for watching!

Комментарии • 399

  • @BeAtPeaceAmongYourselves
    @BeAtPeaceAmongYourselves Год назад +19

    So beautiful, I want to play modern warships again :

  • @alexanderschwarm7755
    @alexanderschwarm7755 2 года назад +2

    Your channel is always a joy to watch

  • @scoshyg5133
    @scoshyg5133 Год назад +2

    I could watch this forever lol I just love it.

  • @lindapowell117
    @lindapowell117 2 года назад +52

    Jim Powell speaking.
    This is truly amazing. As a Navy vet who served in a fighter squadron on the USS Ranger in the late 60’s, we had nothing on that carrier like they have today. When you have an investment of billions of dollars, for just one carrier, and that does not include all the aircraft, you must protect it. Great to see the innovation and commitment of the Navy.

    • @garypadilla4408
      @garypadilla4408 2 года назад +1

      I AGREE GARY A PADILLA USS RANGER UNDER THEN PRESIDENT BUSH SENIOR CREATOR OF SG1 STARGATE TO JIM POWELL AWSOME FOR THE NAVY!

    • @dustinmurphy5557
      @dustinmurphy5557 2 года назад +15

      This is a video game

    • @seadragonyt5391
      @seadragonyt5391 Год назад

      Uh oh.

    • @laff__8821
      @laff__8821 Год назад

      @James Libby it's still simulated as precise as possible

    • @randalcook325
      @randalcook325 Год назад

      I agree with Mr. Powell. The navy would not spend the money on these massive war machines if they were not able to successfully able to defend them and the naval personnel that man's them. God Bless the United States and our Armed Forces.

  • @Keatoil
    @Keatoil Год назад +6

    This is actually a good way to waste the enemies C-RAM bullets so that the jet fighters have a better chance at attacking

    • @Brutalchaos2
      @Brutalchaos2 Год назад

      C-RAMS (Counter rocket, artillery, and mortar) aren't used to take down jets, they would use SM type missiles.

    • @Keatoil
      @Keatoil Год назад

      @@Brutalchaos2 ik this is just a game lol

  • @bryantbishop8352
    @bryantbishop8352 2 года назад +18

    I literally thought this was real for a minute until i noticed that shading was off for clouds showing "depth" and the smoke from destroyed aircraft.....i sure hope you are either independently building PC wartime simulation games or are working with members of game manufacturers in the likes of DCS and Vtol, outstanding job!!!

    • @tommybestonso6509
      @tommybestonso6509 Год назад +2

      Imagine if you took out all existing coms to a major fleet/vessels & then convinced the country/commanders with high-tech grafix that they experienced catastrophic loss of assets in battle with great video of their best assets destroyed & helpless long enough to promt a successful surrender before they realize they had not realized they hadn't lost most their fleet & were watching a damn good movie... what's that old saying warriors win battles, logistics win wars ! What would a commander do that believes he has nothing left to command ?

  • @manueltubens535
    @manueltubens535 Год назад +1

    Hell of a light show performance from our military.

    • @TomeSouza-dk7xj
      @TomeSouza-dk7xj 4 месяца назад +1

      military (Hell of a light show performance from our versalsour ats wordy que lovas biode youns mode con't odo evexeandado ekos angour hiogs tos poor not my tems is song os wdoly Just juss zisa 5:00

  • @drew65sep
    @drew65sep Год назад

    You got a LOT more improvement that has to made to become video game puppet master.

  • @rubberslugs3454
    @rubberslugs3454 Год назад

    Been looking everywhere, how do you get the Cram to shoot red tracers I stead of the vanilla white Tracers?

  • @saskoilic
    @saskoilic 2 года назад +4

    Wow Amazing :)

  • @n.r.2258
    @n.r.2258 Год назад

    one simple Poseidon takes care of the whole fleet. These high speed guns are toys for video games.

  • @silverlining6824
    @silverlining6824 2 года назад +16

    China has adopted the doctrine of saturation attack: not one cruise missile or suicide drone at a time, but 80 or 200 -- because they are cheap while the target value is high.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 2 года назад +1

      And what you think US battle groups will not be saturating the battle space?
      Those C-Ram systems saturate volume space they are not a direct hit fire line.

  • @ayelehabte6787
    @ayelehabte6787 2 года назад +7

    all are technology and contemporary weapons knowing easy ways this is amazing for us.

  • @weirdorwack996
    @weirdorwack996 2 года назад

    Nice CGI. Almost got me ;)

    • @TCDdpa
      @TCDdpa Год назад

      Got to be kidding!This is game console CGI. Not even on the same planet with Hollywood CGI🤣

  • @caydenmongolo401
    @caydenmongolo401 Год назад

    10 minutes of pure American freedom

  • @ABH3DAD
    @ABH3DAD Год назад +1

    we never had that many cwis on the nimitz , now and days they have nato sea sparrow missile system ... CWIS is ship based and CRAM is land based.. EXCELLENT SIMULATOR THOUGH

  • @elidodiaz9151
    @elidodiaz9151 2 года назад +1

    Están bonitos los muñequitos esos

  • @soppo01
    @soppo01 2 года назад +1

    ありがとうございます!

  • @BastienSirugo
    @BastienSirugo 2 года назад

    Puisant tir

  • @ericclausen6772
    @ericclausen6772 Год назад +1

    Add lasers and then you will have a total defense systems

  • @rudygomez186
    @rudygomez186 2 года назад

    Wtf they dropping them jets like flies!! 😱

  • @billsee476
    @billsee476 2 года назад +1

    i see the ships bridge has a nice flashing light at the top of the mast, a nice aiming point? lol

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 2 года назад

      If the enemy can see that light they are in serious trouble.

  • @jesseflynn1259
    @jesseflynn1259 Год назад +1

    DAMN !!! I want a gun like that !!!!!

  • @LagrangePoint901
    @LagrangePoint901 Год назад +2

    I wonder how many incoming missiles would it take to overwhelm these phalanx systems. The simulation basically showed concentrated fire on one missle at a time.

    • @scoshyg5133
      @scoshyg5133 Год назад

      They were literally firing at multiple missiles and aircraft at the same time. What a video where are you watching?

    • @emptyforrest
      @emptyforrest Год назад

      wouldnt take many anti ship missiles to saturate the phalanx system.

  • @josephheuneman5613
    @josephheuneman5613 Год назад

    Now I call that a buzzsaw

  • @joelgamboa4980
    @joelgamboa4980 2 года назад +1

    Imagina cuantos barcos se necesitan para parar todos los misiles. , es un sueño huagiro ,

  • @user-rt5bw5ge9s
    @user-rt5bw5ge9s 2 года назад +23

    If laser defense system can work,it will crush incoming attacks almost 100%。

    • @Not-TheOne
      @Not-TheOne 2 года назад

      yeah, if you could have them up 24/7 with with enough power and enough cooling, it'll be amazing. With enough power you could take down almost anything. Never need any kinetic or chemical weapons (as in explosive), except for very far off targets like long range attack planes, as lasers wont be effective on very long range due to crap like dust in the air bringing down the power.
      Railguns would also be great, but not guided at long range, though, I've always wondered if, say, you launch a projectile via a railgun and then the last few kilometers, have a small rocket or electrically moved fins to guide it for fine movement.

    • @qtamnguyen
      @qtamnguyen 2 года назад

      We will make submerged laser ∆∆

    • @sagartech4622
      @sagartech4622 2 года назад +1

      Laser defence system only have India

    • @salmeza85
      @salmeza85 2 года назад

      What if you send...200 planes.

    • @user-md5ps2og9v
      @user-md5ps2og9v 2 года назад

      Забавное заблуждение.

  • @bigfish1676
    @bigfish1676 2 года назад +11

    Is this real or computer generated? Doesn't look real at all. I'm sure they're capable of it, no doubt there.

    • @pid__5234
      @pid__5234 2 года назад

      I think it's made in a simulatior, but i may be wrong.

    • @Charly214
      @Charly214 2 года назад

      But the C-RAM is real

    • @sathishd8453
      @sathishd8453 2 года назад +1

      Yes bro

  • @newsr2311
    @newsr2311 2 года назад

    Nice game ...

  • @mariomendoza7885
    @mariomendoza7885 2 года назад +1

    Genial los saludo yo el facha dj pitty mendoza

  • @collierdodson9806
    @collierdodson9806 2 года назад

    Wow

  • @edivan241
    @edivan241 2 года назад +1

    Isso aí é pareo pra mísseis hipersonicos?

  • @chrisfoerster3258
    @chrisfoerster3258 Год назад

    Whoever hears a voice should treat it as a servant.

  • @carlosunoyaay5776
    @carlosunoyaay5776 Год назад

    Se observa defensa para vuelo rasante tbn. Queda la opción sumergido rasante.

  • @joseandres5185
    @joseandres5185 Год назад +2

    El motor de un fuera Borda ✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️🛫🛫🛬🛬

  • @eduardotrucillo6825
    @eduardotrucillo6825 2 года назад +7

    El piloto de un avión de combate dispara un misil desde unos 10 km y no tiene necesidad de acercar a la defensa aérea.

    • @amaurimartinez5900
      @amaurimartinez5900 2 года назад +1

      Si y te recuerdo también q este barco lleva a bordo un escuadrón FA18 y uno F35 q avioncito se podrá pegar a 10 km de este portaaviones jjjjjjjjjjjjj

    • @gerardoa.uzcategui.8937
      @gerardoa.uzcategui.8937 2 года назад

      Igualmente es neutralizado 😄

    • @justiciero35
      @justiciero35 2 года назад

      Estos aparatos modernos alcanzan 30 kilómetros

  • @josecamilorojas5992
    @josecamilorojas5992 2 года назад +1

    Bonita la película gringa

  • @lucioaugustodesouza7780
    @lucioaugustodesouza7780 Год назад

    This game it's realy Nice.

  • @CUCARACHA707
    @CUCARACHA707 Год назад

    Buena SIMULACION... JEJEJEJEJE DEBEN INCLUIRLA EN CALL OF DUTTY

  • @edicaballerotorres331
    @edicaballerotorres331 Год назад

    Que cantidad de armamento .de misiles y munisiones tiene un portaaviones tiene y que tiempo puede defenderse de ataques aereos y de misiles enemigos

  • @donnelson8121
    @donnelson8121 2 года назад +10

    If you sank a US carrier the next thing you would see is a stealth bomber

    • @Madmok128
      @Madmok128 2 года назад

      Next to impossible

    • @Sandhill1988
      @Sandhill1988 2 года назад +1

      You wouldn't see it... that's the point.

  • @gustavogonzalez8131
    @gustavogonzalez8131 2 года назад

    Dibujos animados presenta!!....

  • @Bill-xx2yh
    @Bill-xx2yh Год назад +1

    Needs the NEW LAZERS.

  • @edivan241
    @edivan241 2 года назад +1

    Os lazeres são mais ágeis e eficiente

  • @yanuEPro
    @yanuEPro 2 года назад +3

    Kenapa kita tidak mengunakan kecerdasan kita untuk perDAMAIan di Bumi ini???

  • @ABH3DAD
    @ABH3DAD Год назад

    As i remember we only had 1 cwis and that was portside aft of cat 3 & 4

  • @clay6145
    @clay6145 Год назад

    That's at Liberty Bell it rings loud don't miss

  • @pittizitongo1773
    @pittizitongo1773 Год назад

    Ist that Combat Action,or Tests ? Are the aircrafts flight by real pilots ? Amazing firepower sweet Video thanks

    • @Lerxn
      @Lerxn Год назад

      No sir that is a simulation on a game

  • @juniorleslie4804
    @juniorleslie4804 2 года назад +10

    Hope that works in missile saturation attacks, which the fleet is likely to face in a war in the Pacific ocean.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 2 года назад

      Battleships in a war will not be on their own they will be part of battle groups and they will have aircraft in the air as well.
      And the volume that they will unleash will be far greater than the video game shows. Those C-Rams are not a single line of fire they fill up the volume of space with explosive rounds. Those tracers you are see are one in every ten rounds.

    • @juniorleslie4804
      @juniorleslie4804 2 года назад

      @@bighands69 Yes I know tracers are one in ten rounds. But even with a 4500 per minute rate of fire for the C-RAMs?; will it be enough, to prevent saturation attacks from overwhelming the point defenses of the CIWS?

  • @jimaldridge4284
    @jimaldridge4284 2 года назад

    Nice video game

  • @Hellmiko702
    @Hellmiko702 Год назад

    That's the sea Ram Gatling gun in action but that's like four or five maybe six of them

  • @SKumar-rb1tz
    @SKumar-rb1tz Год назад

    India should adopt this technology.

  • @elpampeano4857
    @elpampeano4857 Год назад

    ¡¡¡ faaa, loco !!!
    Buenísimo éste video juego.
    ¿ dónde lo consigo?

  • @azimuth361
    @azimuth361 2 года назад

    It's kinda pretty.

  • @alishabani9283
    @alishabani9283 2 года назад

    درودبرشما خیلی هم ممنون از زحمات عجب ناو هواپیمابر وحشت ناکی😱

  • @pedroarzola1640
    @pedroarzola1640 2 года назад +15

    Los misiles hipersónicos que Rusia tiene pueden alcanzar velocidades hasta de veces la velocida del sonido

    • @jorgeserrano2240
      @jorgeserrano2240 2 года назад +2

      Los aviones de quinta y sexta generación vuelan a tres y cuatro veces la velocidad del sonido según fuentes especializadas.

    • @gerardoa.uzcategui.8937
      @gerardoa.uzcategui.8937 2 года назад +2

      Adónde leíste esa propaganda?🤔

    • @JhonCalister
      @JhonCalister 2 года назад

      y el loco de putin es capas de usarlo contra inocentes

    • @manuterae9377
      @manuterae9377 2 года назад

      Hijo! Con la Mary Jane. Ves pasar todo rápido!

    • @fernandoboggiano4408
      @fernandoboggiano4408 2 года назад +4

      Estados Unidos tiene misiles que viajan hasta 9 veces la velocidad del sonido.

  • @davidlarondelle2326
    @davidlarondelle2326 2 года назад

    We have a dead mall in Bradenton FL

  • @Chelon
    @Chelon 2 года назад +1

    Consulta cuantos peces mueren en estos sistemas de defensas?

    • @reyeskali3529
      @reyeskali3529 2 года назад

      Te preocupas más por los peces que por los seres humanos que cosas no ?

    • @edgarramirez3283
      @edgarramirez3283 2 года назад

      Si podemos decirle señor al ese psicópata no le importa nadie, sino el poder y nadie se atreve a eliminarlo, sería lo mas justo ya que no ha tenido compasión con civiles, mujeres, niños etc.

  • @Spinnaker206
    @Spinnaker206 2 года назад

    Que pasa si los pilotos atacan volando a baja altura, digamos volando por debajo de la línea de cubierta?

    • @lemuria4684
      @lemuria4684 2 года назад

      A media/larga distancia no importa , el problema sería si el avión estuviera muy cerca ,en cuyo caso ni al avión le quedarían chances de maniobras , se estrellaría , o al menos eso pienso yo

    • @eybicavi4535
      @eybicavi4535 2 года назад

      O atacan en forma de cruz... ya estan listos los barcos

  • @joseandres5185
    @joseandres5185 Год назад

    La verdad que se puede decir , hay qué bonitos , los fuegos artificiales , hasta cantan la hora * .

  • @kevinstory872
    @kevinstory872 Год назад

    why do they look inefficient? is it because i am unfamiliar with the difficulty of shooting down something like that?

  • @jashhmurilloz5062
    @jashhmurilloz5062 2 года назад

    Single. Missile. Air. Carrier is. Goin down

  • @juvenerantoniorebolledoang4094
    @juvenerantoniorebolledoang4094 2 года назад +2

    Esto es real o ficción ?

  • @tommybestonso6509
    @tommybestonso6509 2 года назад +5

    Question for anyone familiar with the iron dome defense system, could you theoretically link say( 4 )carriers (destroyers , even Ohio class ) & replicate a iron dome style defense between them ? It seems to me if possible you could severely cut in a lot of potential threats, Just wondering ?

    • @lindapowell117
      @lindapowell117 Год назад +1

      I can say this, every aircraft carrier has great defenses around it and under it. So, all you need not worry about any carrier in dangerous waters.

    • @stuwest5862
      @stuwest5862 Год назад

      Putting 4 carriers in the same location would be a stupid idea.

    • @emptyforrest
      @emptyforrest Год назад

      phalanx are rather short range. the probability of a hitting what they are shooting at drasticly decreeses the further away it is.

  • @michelbilly9221
    @michelbilly9221 2 года назад +4

    Good job america

  • @stevemclennan2459
    @stevemclennan2459 2 года назад +5

    Watch it several times then you will realise it’s cgi at its finest. When the aircraft explode then plummet to the ground or sea why does the smoke trail follow them

  • @DavidFMayerPhD
    @DavidFMayerPhD 2 года назад +3

    Why in the Hell would a warship have its lights on during combat at night?

    • @tosti23
      @tosti23 Год назад

      Its a PC Game.......

  • @nathanruben3372
    @nathanruben3372 2 года назад +2

    Phanlans do not hava such ammo capacity.

  • @llizvera277
    @llizvera277 2 года назад

    que buen juego nintendo

  • @Swaggs907
    @Swaggs907 Год назад +1

    This is a best case scenario for the enemy with traditional means. In close, stationary, no aircraft or escort fleet. You could I guess overwhelm it. But it would still take a lot of kit to kill it.

  • @Commander-Rem
    @Commander-Rem 2 года назад +3

    I hope the c ram can run day and night 24/7 continuously.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 2 года назад

      US battle groups are capable of remaining in battle for long periods of time. Think of how large the ships are now think of how much ammunition they can carry.

    • @ringofasho7721
      @ringofasho7721 Год назад

      That's some double redundancy there

  • @angelwiliamsloayzamayorga1886
    @angelwiliamsloayzamayorga1886 2 года назад +1

    Cuándo derribe un misil hipersonico le creo..

  • @alphillips5478
    @alphillips5478 2 года назад

    This is JUNK!
    CARTOONS

  • @walterrichards4362
    @walterrichards4362 2 года назад +8

    The defensive firepower on an aircraft carrier is awesome but how long can this coverage be sustained in the event of a concentrated multi-pronged attack? And what are the defenses against underwater threats..mines, torpedoes etc?

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 2 года назад +1

      US battleships are part of groups. So that means the US right now can form about 11 such battle groups with each group able to put over 100 aircraft in the air.
      Think of how large those ships are now think of how much ammunition they can carry and unleash.
      Each Carrier group will have its own battle squadron that on its own would be impossible to take down never mind a carrier being present.
      In WW3 the US will have about 1000 carriers active.

    • @puny-tinsucks5102
      @puny-tinsucks5102 Год назад +1

      @@bighands69 the US navy has like 12 carriers, let's not get carried away here....lol

    • @fgm1197
      @fgm1197 Год назад

      A carrier is never alone

    • @_samtakoi_
      @_samtakoi_ Год назад

      @@bighands69 ну они величие свое на дне будут показывать после одной ракеты кинжал, запущенной с расстояния на котором авианосец даже об этом не узнает)

    • @_samtakoi_
      @_samtakoi_ Год назад

      @@bighands69 100 самолетов 800 вертолетов 4 звездолета и это только на одном звездатом авианосце, а да еще шубы норковые три и два видемагнитофона))) Эпоха авианосцев уже похоронена, их можно потопить с российской базы на американской базе, даже выплыть не успеет)))

  • @mrrobertwolfiii1079
    @mrrobertwolfiii1079 Год назад

    Much more accurately set fun to return fire.

  • @pascalkonobly770
    @pascalkonobly770 2 года назад

    système anti-missile de quel pays?

  • @lanekelly79
    @lanekelly79 2 года назад +1

    I need stock in the co that makes this beautiful machine.

  • @wynestra04
    @wynestra04 Год назад

    is it animated?

  • @timurcakir5945
    @timurcakir5945 2 года назад +6

    They live in a very dreamy world. They're going to attack from all those targets, and that aircraft carrier is going to survive😄

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 2 года назад

      US Aircraft carriers are extremely tough and would require massive missiles to actually hit them. In a real battle it would take constant hits from artillery that is by the way far more effective than a missile to take down those carriers.
      Here is the thing that most people do not realize is that carriers in a war would be part of a group and if a major world war was to break out the US would have a thousand of them active.

    • @KannanKannan-xw9jj
      @KannanKannan-xw9jj 2 года назад

      ஈஎ

    • @carlospalacios3115
      @carlospalacios3115 2 года назад

      @@bighands69¿ me entero! q estados unidos tienen mil portaaviones y q el fuego de artillería es mas efectiva q los misiles, mínimo vives bajo una piedra para hacer semejante comparación de fuego y precisión o eres estupido ya q todavia no e visto ninguna artillería con mas poder destructivo y precisión q el de un misil hipersónico con capacidad nuclear o un misil telmo bárico o misiles nucleares normales pero bueno segun tu logica los misiles no sirven contra un portaaviones por q me imagino q cuando le lanzen un ataque a esos portaaviones les lanzaran misiles relleno de flores y misiles de juguetes porq la única potencia con armas de verdad es estados unidos entonces y los demas paises son simples moscas en comparación a estados unidos q tiene según tu miles de de estos grupos de portaaviones jajajajajajajajaja a y respecto a si se llega a desatar una nueva guerra mundial de poco le servirá a estados unidos si tiene 11 portaaviones en servicio 66 de echo es el numero máximo q a construido estados unidos de los cuales muchos de ellos ya están inservibles o descontinuados y de esos 66 solo 11 están operativo y activos hoy en dia asi q no se de donde sacaste q estados unidos tiene mil portaaviones activos en espera de la próxima guerra mundial a otra cosa países potencia como rusia y china tienen en su arsenal misiles hipersónicos con capacidad nuclear capaces de destruir portaaviones enteros incluso muchos de los navíos escoltas de dicho portaaviones resultarian destruidos y muchos otros con daños irreparables sin hablar de la total perdida de las vidas humanas q serán carbonizadas al instante y los q no morirán por radiación y todo ese daño tan solo con un misil hipersónico con ojivas nucleares.!

  • @mrrobertwolfiii1079
    @mrrobertwolfiii1079 Год назад

    Target practices with live fire

  • @TZG-trks
    @TZG-trks 2 года назад

    is this real?

  • @marekbiesaga5164
    @marekbiesaga5164 Год назад

    Z tego co widzę jednak zwykłe działa potrafią zrobić cuda a nie te wydumane delikatne rakietki. Chyba żeby poszła nawała tak z setką pocisków na różnych trajektoriach. Ja to mówią mądrzy ludzie i Herkules dupa kiedy wrogów kupa.

  • @tkirby
    @tkirby Год назад

    Why does a radar guided gun need tracers?

  • @pjwarez
    @pjwarez 2 года назад

    What game is this???

  • @olivderpo
    @olivderpo Год назад

    and Poseidon swims under water

  • @Naturebeauty4earth
    @Naturebeauty4earth 2 года назад +2

    Well animation 😂

  • @ricardofranco1986
    @ricardofranco1986 Год назад

    Ese sistema derribara tambien Planetas lejanos a años Luz, como el planeta pluton jaja

  • @muhammaddahlan830
    @muhammaddahlan830 11 месяцев назад

    Baru di lapis kembali dari depan :
    1. Di depan Sumba atau Sumba besar
    2. Di depan sabu atau sawu
    3. Di depan Rote atau roti
    4. Di depan tsemau
    5. Di depan TENAU ATAU KUOANG DI LEDAK KAPAL LAUT KAPAL PETI KEMAS, DI LEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAOAL KARGO, DILEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAOAL PELNI, DILEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAOAL TENKER, DILEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAPAL BATU BARA, DIELDAK KAPAL LAUT KAPAL SELAM DI LEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAPAL CURAH
    6. DI DEOAN ATAPUPU SAMA SDA
    7. DI DWOAN DILLI
    8. DIDEOAN SEREWARU
    9. DIDEOAN KAKABAHI
    10. DIDEOAN PURA
    11.DIDWOAN TEREWENG
    12. DIDEOAN MARGETHA.13. DIDEOAN LEWOLEBA.
    13. DIDEOAN ADINARA
    14. DIDEOAN KARANTUKA FLORES TIMUR
    15. DIKEMBALIKAN DIDEOAN KUPANG 🕋🕋🕋🕍🕍🕍🕋🕋🕋🕌🕌🕌🕋🕋🕋🏰🏰🏰🕋🕋🕋👍👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @RicardoHernandez-ez8xw
    @RicardoHernandez-ez8xw 2 года назад +2

    De que país es este armamento, deben especificar.

  • @markyanh6630
    @markyanh6630 2 года назад

    GOOD

  • @leopoldocadenaalonso8705
    @leopoldocadenaalonso8705 Год назад

    En los simuladores derriban todo la realidad no se sabe porque no ha ocurrido

  • @josecarlosfunezhernandez9313
    @josecarlosfunezhernandez9313 2 года назад +1

    un misil ipersonico no lo ven llegar

  • @argent2020
    @argent2020 2 года назад +2

    Only in simulations you would have the option on/off (Or a cheat code) unlimited Ammo :) In reality the enemy (Russia) have installed in their Su's a Jamming device which was put into practice against an American warship. One split second: "No power".

    • @darcskies777
      @darcskies777 2 года назад +1

      Still believing the Russian propaganda after what you've seen in Ukraine? Lol

    • @pathosofmine
      @pathosofmine Год назад

      That's to assume if they still bother to maintain those systems

  • @jenndrigxonlipsky4641
    @jenndrigxonlipsky4641 2 года назад +1

    ese portaaviones esta bien chingon me pregunto de quien es ese portaaviones bien diamadres China rusia europa o la potencia mas poderosa del mundo soyedinennyye shtaty Ameriki

  • @luisquijada4342
    @luisquijada4342 2 года назад

    Es real. Broma. Nilo
    puedo creer

  • @patrickstamm9554
    @patrickstamm9554 2 года назад

    How do we get all that lead out of the seas so it doesn’t poison the fish? And us?

  • @Madmok128
    @Madmok128 2 года назад

    Missile command

  • @finzy4966
    @finzy4966 2 года назад +4

    What type of aircraft carrier

  • @pallabsamanta3884
    @pallabsamanta3884 2 года назад

    Wait wait.

  • @juliocastilloorellana172
    @juliocastilloorellana172 2 года назад

    Potencia Rucia