Video posted: ruclips.net/user/shortsE6G9HWsdb_Y?feature=share by title: - a rotating system is not an inertial reference ... but when ever ! and description: If only the smaller upper square rotates, the apparent Coriolis force is revealed to the rotating observer R, so that the stationary observer F with respect to the laboratory, seeing a curve described, tells R that he is in a system that is not inertial. If the lower rectangle also counter-rotates, simultaneously with the square, and with the same angular velocity as the latter, the fixed observer F with respect to the laboratory, seeing a straight and uniform path described, tells R that he is in an inertial system on the basis to Newton's first law. And therefore we have the absurdity that a rotating system (with even a counter-rotation present) is simultaneously an inertial system and also a non-inertial system. Giovanni from Italy
Excellent demonstration. I've added Dutch subtitles on Amara.org, so I can use this with my students in the classroom. Thanks you for making the option available to translate the subtitles.
I need to know how did the "second wind"(which u moved from equator towards north pole) deflected to right. It seemed to be deflected towards left.(when i experimented that the same way) Kindly answer to this. Thanks
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Video posted:
ruclips.net/user/shortsE6G9HWsdb_Y?feature=share
by title:
- a rotating system is not an inertial reference ... but when ever !
and description:
If only the smaller upper square rotates, the apparent Coriolis force is revealed to the rotating observer R, so that the stationary observer F with respect to the laboratory, seeing a curve described, tells R that he is in a system that is not inertial.
If the lower rectangle also counter-rotates, simultaneously with the square, and with the same angular velocity as the latter, the fixed observer F with respect to the laboratory, seeing a straight and uniform path described, tells R that he is in an inertial system on the basis to Newton's first law.
And therefore we have the absurdity that a rotating system (with even a counter-rotation present) is simultaneously an inertial system and also a non-inertial system.
Giovanni from Italy
Excellent demonstration. I've added Dutch subtitles on Amara.org, so I can use this with my students in the classroom. Thanks you for making the option available to translate the subtitles.
The southern hemisphere rotates clockwise and the Coriolis effect will pull everything to the left.
I need to know how did the "second wind"(which u moved from equator towards north pole) deflected to right. It seemed to be deflected towards left.(when i experimented that the same way)
Kindly answer to this. Thanks