Building a 40 size foam board fuselage.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 май 2024
  • This is an exact copy of the once popular Hobbico 40 trainer. I built a fuselage entirely out of foam board and some thin basswood. this is a complete video of the process and the painting. I can't wait to test fly this airplane! It came out almost a pound and a half lighter than the original fuselage with the eflite bl25 motor. thanks for watching please like and subscribe and keep an eye out for the test flight video....
  • ХоббиХобби

Комментарии • 9

  • @krvrcreview2722
    @krvrcreview2722  Месяц назад

    Its an exact copy of the Tower hobbies late 90s arf just made it a tail dragger.

  • @Twissted-RC
    @Twissted-RC 2 месяца назад +1

    Shaved over a lb off. Has to feel a lot different in flight.

    • @krvrcreview2722
      @krvrcreview2722  2 месяца назад

      We will see hopefully the wind calms down this weekend so I can go fly it!

  • @daviddavids2884
    @daviddavids2884 Месяц назад +1

    905 strange wing. apparently, no center section. the vert-stab could be a little taller. should be equal to slightly less-than fifty percent of the horiz-stab span. d

    • @krvrcreview2722
      @krvrcreview2722  Месяц назад

      The wing is the wing that came with the ARF it's balsa wood and plywood.

  • @daviddavids2884
    @daviddavids2884 Месяц назад +1

    727 'adding' mass at the tail should be avoided. dom, remember. maybe, glue fillets would do the job, with less mass. obviously, the use of a tail wheel makes the tail Heavier. did you even consider using a (low-mass) skid.
    733 there should be NO extra, cosmetic bends in a PUSHROD.! this is not an opinion. d

    • @krvrcreview2722
      @krvrcreview2722  Месяц назад

      Well it flies great and it's balanced perfect but everyone has there opinion.

  • @daviddavids2884
    @daviddavids2884 Месяц назад +1

    005 the slope of the vert-stab le is/was excessive. about 75 degrees is nominal. for a miniature vert-stab. there is one problem with making a tail boom from a panel material. it is this:
    there Will be excess mass in the tail boom, Unless corrective steps are taken.!
    specifically, construction of the tail boom should accommodate the use of (mass-reducing) cutouts.
    150, 915 for a tail dragger, the main lg should be located directly below the wing leading edge. this is not an opinion. for proof, look at full-sized tail draggers.
    515 servos go Near the cg, not aft-of it.! this is not an opinion. it's about distribution of mass (dom). similarly, the mass of aileron servos should be located forward-of thirty percent of chord.
    there is Nothing Wrong with a long pushrod.! assuming it is correctly made/fabricated and installed. conversely, there is 'nothing good' about a short pushrod.
    920 the use of full strip ailerons is not recommended, on anything that is not a cropduster.!
    924 the root chords of the stabs Should be Equal in length. d

    • @krvrcreview2722
      @krvrcreview2722  Месяц назад

      The only thing I changed on this airplane what is it making it a tail dragger. And building it out of foam everyone seems to be an expert.