Move In Ready 3D Printed House in Germany
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- 3D Printed by PERI with a COBOD printer, designed by Mense Korte. Construction technology is the future, it is the only industry that hasn't become completely unrecognizable from the pre tech past. The partners involved in the construction of this building have pushed the industry forward going where no one has gone before. Innovation is part of the human condition, as a species we need people to tread into unknown territory and experiment with things that had only before been hypothesized.
First Video • The Most Innovative 3D...
Tour with Head Architect Vladimir Korte • Tour Most Innovative 3...
It's funny how the first video I did of this house is one of my most viewed videos, then I went to Germany in person to film a tour through the house with the head architect of the project from Mense Korte and that video got 1/10th the views so now we're back to the voiceover for an update on the finished product. Now that it's come together maybe you will agree that as of now this is the most innovative 3D printed house in the world.
Sign up for the "How to 3D Print a House" course available now at the beta pricing!
automate.const...
My Website
automate.const...
Peri
Peri3dconstruc...
Cobod
cobod.eu
Virtual Village
automate.const...
Automate Construction Podcast
open.spotify.c...
COINBASE LINK ($20+ Free Crypto with Free Courses)
coinbase-consu...
Book a Call with me
jarettgross.yo...
This house is really neat, and I would love to see it. However, if I was having one commissioned, I would likely want a few changes:
- Smoothing of interior and exterior walls. Those walls will look terrible once dirt and dust starts accumulating on the little steps.
- Larger (wider) windows. It is dim inside.
- A larger, more exposed second-floor balcony, or perhaps a roof-top patio.
- Attached garage.
1. You can add material into the grooves afterwards. it's simpler that to smooth it
2. Definetly!
3. A must!
4. Game changer...
Yeah, that's what I wondered about the concrete and exposed layers as well, how difficult it might be to clean
I was wondering about the naked cement that may easily deteriorate by the elements and temperature changes, for example in colder region or hot region, would the composition of cement changes? What is the warranty on materials and how long does it last for that specific region? Is there a finished coating to protect it beyond just a paint job? 😵😵😵😵
The only 3D-print-specific thing on your list is the walls. The smoothing can be done either during printing or by adding filler afterward.
I like how you think 🤔
I seriously doubt one should associate 'low-cost' housing and answering any housing shortage with this technology. HOWEVER, the technology can truly introduce a whole new modern capability in Architecture. Those curved walls are simply amazing.
Thank you for your honesty and well-explained understanding of the subject😍is there more interesting project like this on the future?
those lines will drive me CRAZY !!!
looks like a hay basket. I like the curves, soothes my eyes compared to angles. Looks brut aswell, so nice with wooden colours and black.
How is it reinforced? I don't see any rods or rebar. Is it going to crack and collapse at the first sign of a ground vibration?
Yeah, I'm waiting to see how long it lasts.
One serious test is what the outside walls look like in ten years time. Concrete can look pretty dire after a bit of weathering. And how do we get flat surfaces where we want them inside? Plaster board is my guess, but maybe there is a new option, or maybe the printer can deliver that to start off with?
Concrete blocks are so cheap and can even be drystacked without grout... not much is easier than stacking blocks.
Dry stacked without grout? I’ve never heard of that
How do you hang up art or family photos on the walls? Needs solar on the roof or grass on the rooftop. How do you stop the damp in the house during winter? Okay done with me questions. I love it! This house is incredible!!!
Any experience from living in that house, or is it just SHOWCASE home?
How safe are these houses in a hurricane, a tornado, or an earthquake?
I love it!
The lack of rebar and metal structureal support doesn't make it seem very strong. Especially with the uniform design being prone to cracks during an earthquake.
I feel 3d printed houses as a whole isn't a good idea. Instead 3d print parts of the house and combing them with the traditional construction methods seem like the best approach.
from the start of printing to the end of printing how long,
I think Frank Lloyd Wright would have approved!
Flat roof can't be good. Otherwise, cool.
How much total cost this house?
I think I saw a report that said it was around 800,000 euros
@@automateconstruction Really?!? Thats not worth it imo.
Price for printing House?? 😊
I hate layer lines from normal plastic 3d prints but with buildings like this it actually looks nice, Looks like a bit of a pain to keep clean compared to flat walls though.
pop hat house in a jar with a drop of acetone and it'll smooth right out
@@room007 hahahahaha
Expensive 3d houses weren't supposed to be the point. The point of them are to fix the housing crises with cheap homes but I guess everyone is still trying to get rich.
No, the point of 3d houses is the ability to scale the construction process, and reduce the number of workers required. It is easier to optimize the cost of concrete than to optimize the cost of dozens of building materials.
@@radist2s wrong. The point of 3d printing was to create a housing solution. But.. I bet that got your capitalist pursuits all in knots, didn't I? You're never going to be a billionaire btw
@@radist2s You are 100% incorrect
@@yodouri6575 in the beginning of the FDM 3d printing I would never have believed that I would have a 3D printer in my house. WASP shows quite cheap hardware solutions for printing. Wait a while and there will be hundreds of contractors with better deals than classic brick homes. Logistics takes up a lot of resources, direct concrete printing makes it easier. You simply buy concrete from the manufacturer and have it ready at the construction site.
@@radist2s You're Barking up the wrong contextual tree buddy
Thanks for this. Really one of my favourite examples of a 3D printed house out there. The shapes and aesthetics you can get from 3D printed concrete is amazing to me. Also, maybe you can just make a different channel for your podcasts? I'd surely subscribe.
It's ugly. Cold and brutalistic. depressing, utilitarian and cheap looking. Not a home at all.
@@peterbelanger4094 you’re preaching to the wrong choir. The more brutalist and utilitarian the better.
@@chrischain_ average depression enthusiast
We definitely don't have enough "high end" homes... As a millennial I doubt I'll ever own a home and technologies like this are one of the few things that make me hope I could one day. Oh well.
People thought socialism was a joke, well, it is not.
There will be some greedy assh*le that will manage to exploit the people for homes like this sooner rather than later.
@@user-pp1ub8er9i What has socialism to do with it?
@@dagda3000 Everything. I'm actually pretty surprised you cannot see the straight and direct relation in between not having the chance of owning a home and socialism.
@@depechex Interesting. So socialism is the reason real estate prices have risen 300% in the last ten years? And I was under the impression that capitalism was the reason for the increase of low wage jobs, the crazy wealth gap, the usage of real estate as an investment increasing prices and decreasing supply, etc.
I absolutely love this . I think I’d prefer to render some of the internal walls only because of dust laying on those ridges. Fabulous house though 👍
i wonder about the potential details this could be reduced down to, i mean you could really print your inbuild status with it lol.
When I win this lottery. I will invest in Peri 3-D printed homes. Buy plenty of land and put homes making my own neighborhood.
Some questions :
1. How many sqm is this house?
2. How much time took to build it?
3. How did this costs?
thanks for the answers!
It's 160sqm according to the video.
It probably took 100 hours or at least it's hinting at that number.
And I don't believe cost was mentioned, because the price is probably waaaay overboard which doesn't make sense, since the whole point of this technology would be to lower the price. A simple google search shows that this prototype costed 450,000 euros.
@@eugep8765 I'm not sure what are the prices for materials and labor in Germany, but I'm pretty confident that people can build a house with similar size for probably 1/3 or worst case 1/2 of the price of this one. Like everything new this is more expensive than it should be. Perhaps 10-15 years from now these types of houses will be cheaper.
Painting the interior walls would be a nightmare and after a few years, every single groove will be filled with dust too. If the 3d printer was a mobile device and wouldn't need to be assembled, it might be an efficient alternative. However the prefab house method, seems to be more efficient and more cost friendly than this.
I also love the looks of the interior, but how would you be able to hang pictures on the wall etc? as they seem a little uneven. and what if you start to drill and put holes in the wall? could that make it crack? And i'm also thinking about accidentally hitting the walls with something hard, would it crumble?
I do however think this is the future way of construction imo!
I give this a solid 8/10 - it does look very nice ngl.
Its cement, very solid, much more solid then any other dry work inside a house, means you can drill holes into it. It would not crack nor crumble.
What intrigues me about this printing technology is the idea that smaller homes can be made with thorougher integration of intelligent facilities (like networking, sensors, LED lighting, speakers and perhaps even microphones and cameras).
In addition this will also allow for the manufacture of fireproofed homes with very high insulation. I live in Australia and bush fires are an ever increasing threat. Creating homes which are, by design, highly fireproof and thermally efficient seems like it should be a high priority. I can imagine keeping such a home cool in summer and warm in winter would be much easier to do than with home built with traditional technologies.
I would like to think the design flexibility that 3D printing provides will create innovative structures for the capture of water from the roof and the utilisation of air and light from the environment. I've yet to see anyone really push the envelope with regards to these aspects.
Design and style is where 3D printing excels. Other than that, I'm sure you can get a house built from concrete in Australia too, even though your options might be drastically smaller, due to the traditions. If not anything else, you cam make your own shell to poor conerete in. Also prefabrication should be widely available. But concrete houses are not really fire proof. Yes, the walls would be standing after fire, but due to the number of flamable materials involved, most of the value (>80%) of the house would be gone. Unless some very special design would be engineered, like ceramics window shutters, etc. Would be interesting engineering project :-)
I live in Australia and being only too aware of fire danger , have embraced building and teaching how to build with aircrete . Building using the strong structural shape of domes are also a environmental and aesthetic plus , the aircrete is fire proof and insulating against temperature and sound .
@@darlenesheart1 I built my house from aircrete too (Ytong by Xella). Aircrete gets damaged by very high temperature, however I beliebe that fire resisting design must incorporate not only the house,but surounding area too, reducing or eliminating flamable materials. Also I don't know,whether you need insulation. In our geographical location I had to add 160mm of polystyrene insulation on top of the 300mm aircrete walls. That wouldn't be very fire safe in Australian coditions... But I think you'd be totally fine in AU with the insulation that provides the aircrete wall itself, since it has very good properties
Brilliant. Yes please
I absolutely love this design the most of any 3d printed house I have seen. There are a few changes I would make but they are small and this is amazing. I would love to see a small village of these made.
I'm really interested in the price, and the time taken to print. I think knowing the intricacies of such a project it would help us better understand the larger commercial applications of the technology. Thanks for the vid!
My only issue is that the indoor walls will get dusty on the ledges, which makes cleaning even worse. I would prefer smooth indoor walls.
Does it reduce the cost? Nope.
Does it make it more sturdy? Nope.
Does it make repairs easier and cheaper? Nope.
You also absolutely have to finish the walls, because of the concrete dust that will develop over time. You don't want to be breathing that stuff in, and since it's also corrosive, it can destroy everything from wood to electronics, along with causing skin rashes. Concrete dust isn't just inert, it's still reactive to moisture of any kind.
It’s probably more sturdy than the other homes in this flood prone region time will tell
I WANT this house. It is gorgeous! One of the most superb examples of what a 3D future home can and should be.
Can i print this in parts? Because my own printer is a bit smaller, so i have to stitch it together i think….
This is an excellent showcase. I would prefer to have seen rockwool used as the insulation. It looks as if they used wood for the floor trusses (rafters?). The resolution vertically seems shorter than some other printers, making for many more layer lines. I would have like to have seen more of the inner wall surfaces smoothed as was done in the stairwell. But much of that is simply niggly nitpicking and personal taste. It is also nice to see it was a printed two story. One of the strangest things I noticed was that there were some sections of the house printed before other sections. Each layer for the entirety of the house was not requisitely printed in unison. That is very interesting.
One feature of a 3D printed structure is that the inner shell can be perfectly plumb while the outer surface could be generated with forced perspective (trapezoidal) to make the structure look taller.
Thank you, great coverage.
Not a modern style fan, but can appreciate the design and technology it took to create this home !! I really think we need alot more technologies to be able to keep up with more ecological trends. I personally love the design of this home.
Yeah I’m going to be filming some really interesting more eco friendly options soon
Building advancements will often be for the benefit of the builder/developer. They are not doing it for the end user. They want to build with less cost but still charge markets rates. But it's the end user who will pay the price if these homes don't stand up to the test of time.
Amazing house I have ever seen and hope to see it everywhere and make the design available publicly, well done 3D Printer and their inventor 👍💐😊
8 months to build a house?
All those interior walls are dust magnets,.
Lol... have to hire a team to come with a brush and vacuum the walls because all those grooves are bound to gather dust and depending on moisture could get moldy. I love this
oh thats right
Nah, just buy a battery operated pressure washer. Keep it simple.
Two thing that have reduced dust in my place: Get a long vac hose and use a shop vac located outside. Small, silent hepa filters are dirt cheap (lol) nowadays. I have 2 running full time. Reduced the mold (I am a hypochondriac when it comes to mold).
Yeah I wouldn't want that, imagine the amount of dust captured in the lines... that seems just like a lot of work. Inside I would not want that effect.
Really like this .. Its well designed in my view
on a negative all those ridges gathering dust
That looks like a very inefficient and expensive way to build a house. I'm not against automation, but this is not optimal.
Steps toward the future
I like how honest you were and well educated in the subject. Cant wait to see what this tech is in 10years
Thanks, me too! Stephan provided great authority on the subject.
I am in the precast concrete industry and the first time that we built a house in precast I thought it might work but since then done a few.It is still a small percentage but the main reason this builder is successful is because he guarantees a four bedroom house finished in seven weeks.
Curious Can One Actually Scan A House From A Picture Into Your System & It Will Copy The Design? Would It Be Able To Print Out The ie: Biltmore Manor In Ashville North Carolina? What's The Most Fanciest Mansion You Have Ever Built? What Is The COST Of This Built On This Video? I Would THINK That 3D Printed House Are 100% Fire Proof & Can HOLD UP To Significant Winds?
I think this technology is incredible and very promising for future affordable housing. The design of this house is dramatic but somewhat reminiscent of a bunker. The un-clad inner walls are interesting but I wonder if all the walls in the house stayed un-clad if the horizontal stripes of the printed concrete would start getting annoying after awhile - kind of dizzying in nature. All in all, I love that research and development is being conducted on this level regarding innovating housing technology solutions.
These houses are not necessary cheaper the conventional houses.
سيتم تطوير هذه التقنية لاحقا وسيتم تفادي كل السلبيات المصاحبة لها
Love the innovation but I have to wonder about the German bureaucracy which is famous for its red tape. Innovative design, energy efficient heating/A/C / highly efficient building modes of construction... all of this is amazing and deserves credit, except for the fact that when it comes to Germany's legendary bureaucratic maze every new idea must find its way through, with little help from anyone. It is designed to reject change. It is backward-looking. It is its own worst enemy. It is so safe it's dangerous. Just ask Tesla - now that story will kill innovation in Germany faster than anything.
I like the imperfections that the 3D printed cement outside has as opposed to how perfect it looks when done indoors.
Yes Its for displaying the technology I guess - you could style it the way you want
It would be interesting if they will do a manual building of the exact specs right next to it so we can compare which one is more efficient.
Better than America’s cardboard houses
It's absolutely a marvel. I love it. The only feedback I would have, at least for my particular taste, is to have only a couple of the walls exposed. Perhaps exposed as accent walls? Reason is because I like to hang things on the walls (photos, art, TV mount, etc). It personalizes the space and makes it more intimate. It would be fantastic to have the occasional exposed wall in, say, the stairwell as an architectural aesthetic design choice. Outstanding quality, though.
Some questions :
1. How many sqm is this house?
2. How much time took to build it?
3. How did this costs?
Without answering in these questions, this kind of video presentation is useless.
Living in a house with such rough walls makes them difficult to clean unless painted and bumping the wall catches clothing. The idea is a direct line from Frank Lloyd Wright’s cement block houses but the renewal of those houses has been tough. The technology, however has great promise for multi family housing as well as singular but I would like to see more artistic things done and surfaces that encourage books and art. It’s still a bit like a house for mere workers when, like the houses, mere workers are being replaced by automation. More Art please.
"mere workers"? Now, that's offensive! This is a beautiful home! And I've been around a pretty long time and lived in brand new homes to homes that were 300+ years old. There are downsides to all of them. But to say they are for "mere workers".......what's THAT supposed to mean?
DON'T even mention his name in any association with this architectural travesty!!!
@@lindajohnson7675 we all come from the time of worker/management however, a "mere" worker means a temporary who is not setting down roots but farms out low complexity work to the company needing it.. They are not the type to put down roots in a house or community beyond temporary work. A 3-D house could be a low cost process for an employer but it would have to be easily cleaned and maintained from tenant to tenant. As for Peter if you are referring to FLWright, he very much wanted to play in this area but, as you say, with aesthetic quality. Unfortunately those $5,000 houses are now half a million dollars and small works of art with artistic costs.
IMO it's butt-ugly. Every room is the same texture and the same color. If you added furring strips and sheet rock to the inside and attractive siding to the outside it would look much nicer.
So funny cos my father-in-law (from Brasil) freaked out when he saw that we build houses with wood instead of concrete. I think videos like these will make him very happy. LOL
As for me, I love the look of the house but not sure how I feel about the texture... I'd rather have smooth walls and yet the curves/texture combo is pretty cool.
I assume You're from the USA. I've heard lumber is cheap in there and it's probably the cheapest way of building houses, I don't see other reason for using wood for construction.
The algorithm is very peculiar link this video in the comments of the viral video and the the architects one as well. The more its shared the more it gets picked up by the algorithm
Very cool I'm a machine operator/programmer myself so I like to see the new technology that's out there. This house looks great and I assume very efficient and almost indestructible. 3d printing definitely seems like a way of the future with unlimited possibilities as it's improved and new materials implemented. 👍
No rebar?Good luck to anyone who decides to live in it!
I love the 3d printed "look" on the outside, but would def want smooth walls inside.
imagine the dust :)
Historically it is the goverment banning building on your own land simply to hike up the prices. So its not lack of houses its over regulation whit the goal of proffiting of other peoples suffering.
God I love this so much. Really the only downfall I see is unless you do cover up the inside walls, I don’t see how you could hand anything on the wall without drilling into the walls. Other than that I love the look
Concrete is terrible for residential. It's inhuman.
@@peterbelanger4094 Why do you think so?
They have been 3D printing houses for thousands of years it's not a new process it's a very old process so is CNC cutting
Beautiful 🥰👍
It looks absolutely awful. Fantastic concept though, keep grinding at it.
I like how they have multiple floors. That would be a big deal for homebuyers. Another idea to showcase or to implement is a shed or gazebo that people would need. Even a walkway 3d printed.
people change to wood to get better climate conditions and now its going backwards just because of design and it looks bad.If printing then please straight walls.meeeeh.
AMAZING GRACE! INSPIRATIONAL! GREAT JOB!
This tech and those that follow will bring the price of structures down dramatically. For example, when printed in locally sourced hempcrete and as more CAD files become public domain, underhoused folks can have places to live too.
The difference between indoor and outdoor printing is striking, presenting a problem (rough look) simultaneously with a solution (maybe clothe the construction site with a tent, then print - not to take away from the sanctuary status of this building in Germany 3d printed by PERI with a COBOD printer)
THANKS JARETT GROSS FOR THE HISTORIC AND TRAIL BLAZING JOURNALISM WORK YOU ARE DOING, JUST IN TIME FOR THE FUTURE.
JOY!
Also concrete isn’t very eco friendly it’s actually way worse for the environment then a stick built home trees are an endless renewable resource the ingredients in concrete are finite once they are gone they are gone forever
environmentally friendly? Concrete is environmentally unfriendly constroction as can be, better use bricks
the exterior looks like a shitty 3d print I'd immediately print again
the problem with this method is : once you set your primary plumbing sleeves and Electrical Junctions ? you can't really remodel in future or reroute them if you want to expand the house , heck you can't really expand the house .
still best homes ever made ? are brick walled , especially double weaving brick walls because they hold the best option for future expansion of existing home . you can't do that with 3 D printed after the 3D home is built and finished .
3 D printing is a great tool in other hand it can build prototypes of tools , weapons and other innovative ideas to come to physical object where you can study farther and advance it better , but other than that ? it is not great innovative method to build homes . because homes always need 3 things: maintaining , remodeling and sometimes expansion .
It’s a beautiful concept house, but I’m not sure it’s ready for real world. Like someone else said, those walls will collect so much dust and will be very hard to clean.
With all the technology that y’all have yet still ppl still suffering every sec make no sense
i know this is off-topic but bro you should get sound absorbing panels
True
@@automateconstruction ye
Method is good,
But texture is suitable for Office, not for house.
I don't like it. Lots of wasted cement. and NO REBAR 🙄🙄
This Design might work with a trowel to smooth out the inside but that concrete look is horrible
its definetly "the future", but the resolution must get better, to get rid of these layer lines!
You’re 100% correct all the dust would settle on all those little lips I have OCD I would have to pressure wash it 🧼 every six months
I think this house will be full of dust on the wall .. I need to vacuum clean the wall too …
, В России такие цементные стены проводники холода в дом во время морозов
I like Jarrett's work very much, just don't agree that 3D printing houses will be ever the CHEAP option :-). The cheap option is here for decades - like number of different prefabricated designs. They have all the pros (except curvy designs) of the 3D printing and more and are way cheaper. Building from aircrete is also *very* fast and cheap. I have a house from Ytong by Xella and don't think it gets much cheapre than that. Building walls is not a huge task, these days, with all the modern materials. So I think the future of 3D printing is in the expensive sector, the projects like shown in this video.
Im wondering, what's the price of having them come to your location , set up the massive printer, and shoot the walls of this house? I'll bet it's astronomical today.
yessir
With weather becoming more extreme I think stick construction will become less and less appealing. Not sure on how green concrete is, will probably be cancelled too, back to the caves we go but with no open flames, too much co2 😂
I’ll move into a cave if there’s a car charger in it
Try a condenser microphone in a different room without echoes.
What would be appropriate price in euro to build such a house? What kind of approvals are needed from government? What time it takes to build house?
I just watched another clip and a bungalow ( ground floor only ) printed house took only 48 hours and apparently is half the cost of buying it on the market. They sold the printed house for $2.7 million ( €2.5 million ) so they made a phenomenal profit. If you have the land to build on already then it's definitely cost effective and a great investment but buying the land to build on alongside printing the house will soon rack up the cost. But again, it doesn't state an actual cost of printing the property in that clip either
I think this is a very attractive home and found it very interesting to see the process. For people who love modern design this is great... My own dream is a Victorian Mansion filled with Antique furnishings... but I can appreciate what this modest home offers.
Is it just me or does architecture just keep getting uglier?
The house seems to have no soul. I find it very ugly.
а что мешает по бокам от сопла две ограничивающих металических пластины поставить чтобы стена получилась ровная а не слоями?
Тоже думал об этом. Скорее всего неравномерная усадка. Она конечно мизерная, разбег скорее всего в миллиметр-два максимум, но на слоистой стене этого не видно (и слоистая стена типа фишка, но сама по себе скрывающая эту неравномерность), а если сглаживать то получится заметная ступенчатость и это будет выглядеть как косяк. С другой стороны ничто не мешает двум-трем работникам в течении недели протянуть слоистую поверхность вручную, держаться должно отлично. Для теплого климата отличная идея такие дома, но для холодного все равно придется утеплять, поэтому проще сразу из бруса построить или газобетона.
This looks more expensive than building the traditional way. How much did it cost?
I believe a saw a report that said over $800k euros
This is dumb. They spend as much time assembling and using the 3D printer as it would take to just build the house.
Yes, but they like to play with their new printer - nonsense
Brilliant, just...brilliant!
But I see one major drawback: due to the construction method with the horizontal lines the inner and outer walls will get dirty very quickly.
But what are the costs compared to tradtional massive build and "ready2house wood" builds?
I think printing is more now but will be cheaper in the future
where stl file ? also what is your printer settings like infill, bed temprature etc. thanks in advance
That’s a funny question for an .STL, most likely they used a .STEP file instead then sliced it into Gcode and uploaded it to the printer. Very similar to desktop 3dcp.
How come there’s noting hanging on the walls. No photos, no book shelves, no trophy Bass, no moth man heads.
just a choice,you can use concrete screws if you want.
Not a fan of the intense nautical streamline moderne look. It's very clear that the design of the house was made in conjunction with the limitations of the printer. As in, hard layered walls, round corners, bottom up supports. That's all this house printer can print. Pass.
dust, the interior wall will just attract dust.