My teacher literally uses A.I. to grade our esays. I'll give you a hint; it sucks. One of my friend got a response written by A.I. printed by my teacher Saying "The phrase Nintendo is not suppose to be capatal". My friend did what it said. Then when my friend got another responds from the A.I. it said to capatolize " the phraze nintendo
I think the main problem with this situation is simple Society only cares about money right now, if we can change that then we will be good for the most part
It's has to be like that so the natural &, super natural can now be a part in selections off limited ideals! Lol 🤣 iq grading should be in some ai & androids! Apps like? The desiring begin,!
@@tuankhangcaonguyen5545 money will always exist, I’m talking specifically about the capitalistic nature to consume and eliminate competition. And remember, when people are pushed to their limits, they revolt
imo i think what most people forgot about ai media is it loses the "fun" aspect. like the main reason people draw, make music, create video, etc. because it was fun to do and letting ai do those thing itself effortlessly is not fun. i mean who enjoys just writing prompts all day compare to puting your effort into making a drawing. at first ai probably be fun to use but after a long time you just get tired of it
Ye its never gonna die it just wont be something to make a living off anymore. Tbh seems like the only jobs that will b left for ppl to do is manual labor/trades but if you’re disabled or get injured and cant work thos jobs anymore then idk what you will do
My English teacher keeps on accusing me of using ai even though ai is against my morals and I told her I’d never use it because I’m an artist the only reason she thought it was written by ai is that “I use big words” so she basically thinks I’m stupid because of my learning disability.
I dont even know how to feel about all of this anymore. It’s like my dreams of becoming an artist or any other creative liberty is crushed because of some godamn artificial intelligence.
I'm an artist, and I tell you. Never give up. Even when all hope seems lost, keep creating. These companies want us to give up on our dreams. Embrace your dreams, never give up.
@gabemissouri this. art is an outlet for hope and many good things so as artists we are irreplaceable because we experience things and find beauty and create. humans and art can't be mass produced
@@periwinkles404 Agreed, God calls to us to create art, to inspire hope in the darkness. To be the torch in the darkest of caves. Like a lighthouse, our creativity, passion, and love shall always shine through the most stormy of Skies.
Imagine people who've been dreaming of accomplishing certain things but haven't had the chance yet. When they finally get the opportunity, they might discover that AI has taken over much of what they were aiming for.
That's how life works in general once you achieve something you notice that it is already useless in one way or another. Maybe it it even better when you see it in advance that something you are trying to accomplish is useless.
When it comes to AI, I don’t think AI will rebel (if anything, I feel like the “AI takeover” would be more like the Scythe book series then Terminator), however, I do think the way people will use it is what we should be concerned about, like with the art concerns you’ve bought up. As for “faceless channels” I agree with a lot of what you’ve said, but I actually think that a lot of those channels can actually be helpful with finding certain things like say game mods or reviews without a bunch of cringy ass jokes. I do like how you try to have a balanced look without ignoring the concerns, because I feel like the internets one sided nature is just going to make it harder for anything regarding this to be done. Hopefully my dumbass words this well.
Indeed now any organisation, company and government would be able to put out pr to promote their values, services or to defame their enemies with very implicating images. If ww3 were to happen, who knows what amount of misinformation can be pumped out 24/7 and how possible it would be to debunk it
My hope for AI is that if it does take over as the majority of content produced and consumed online, it will inbreed itself into being inferior. It really hard for me to explain and put it into words what i mean but I'll try. AI is constantly scraping the internet using websites as training data. AI is not perfect and eventually it'll end up training off itself and other AI while looking for content to train off of. If two 99.99% perfect AIs start training off each other that 0.01% will slowly creep through now those AI ~99.98% perfect. It is much much more complicated than that but i think it gets the point across. I could see this mostly having an effect on AI Image generation with AI training off other AI images. Another thing I'd like to say is that this isn't the end of creativity, it's the end of encouraging creativity. Not only that, this a new age of misinformation. Photographic evidence can't be trusted, audio evidence can't be trusted and now not even video evidence can be trusted thanks to AI.
That’s dumb because it discounts that there might be a slective process that eliminates poor pictures. You know like how evolutionary programming works where ai is trained to utilize successful data while discarding bad one.
@@reniorjdso it'll be trained to not use ai, and with copyright laws, it'll be proven that it can only use human info, so it'll be regulated. Copyright is ai's number one enemy
I get what you mean, dood. AI doesn't create, it only makes a blend of existing things, since it has no "sense" of aesthetics as we do. Once it only copies from itself, it will deteriorate in quality since its whole standard keeps lowering without "fresh" new intake that only humans can provide. It would stagnate.
AI will never fully replace human creativity. Art is about expressing oneself as much as it is about the end product. The soullessness of AI-produced media will prevent it from ever reaching the same level as the human equivalent. It can mass-produce cheap, easily-consumable dreck, but it can't inject the passion or nuance a human can; it can't truly fulfill a person's artistic vision. It won't go away, unfortunately, but I think the world will adapt.
I heard someone say this on another RUclips video, and I think it’s a really good point. Why did we automate the jobs people want? Why did we automate art and writing instead of factory jobs?
One reason I heard, which honestly feels plausible if not correct, is that it is less risky (in terms of literal life and limb) to start on these kinds of tasks to get the tech going.
I just think AI should be lower scaled and some laws should be put in to not allow too much of it to be used in Professional settings. By this I mean, unless its google or something like that, things like AI art should not be allowed to use monetarily.
I agree. Mostly the problem with AI is bad actors who just care about numbers and money. I think adding rules will make AI more of a creative helper, then a job stealer.
I love the way you do these more serious videos about smart topics. The horror mediums video you did is still my favorite by you and one time I was watching on my ps5 and did the data transfer. I didn’t even realize you can’t do anything else like closing a video so it auto played like 15 of your videos while it was updating. W content bro ❤
People think NPCs are AI, they can but they are just codes in a way that does what it says, and if it's a turned based RPG like TMNT legends it's just a random action like a random wheel
Right? Like that's one of the few ways where AI would actually be useful without putting an entire workforce out of a job Especially since stuff like character/./ai, where the bot creators have to write stuff for the chat bots in order to give them a proper characterization, both in their descriptions and their chat training, and it's actually pretty nuanced and requires some talent to work. Plus, it's for roleplay(a non-profit effort that already had mostly-dead popularity person-to-person wise), not an essay/script generator
There is no reason to use AI for NPC because even if you can that woud be very distracting as you wodu not be able to follow the game You are not supposed engage in erotic roleplay with bartender or try to convince them to do something they can't do, you are supposed just to get a quest and leave.
@@deltaxcd Just have a time limit, like conversations do in real life with schedules and stuff. Especially since NPCs like that are there to fill in for jobs, and obviously in real life you can't talk to a bartender while they're on their shift since they have other clients and co-workers they have to be mindful of. I can imagine it being a bad idea without that implementation, though.
@@BinglesP this is just specific example, why you don't need AI for NPCs because NPC purpose is to tell player a story and your job as a player is to read every hardcoded line to get all story content If Ai is generating responses it is wasting player time because now you don't even know if that text has any importance and it will get you anywhere. You don't even know if your attempt to flirt with bartender will do anything like convince them to give you some hidden quest or scene.
I am mainly scared about the working class if nothing happens. When robots and ai take most jobs. What happens to the people with the jobs not working and making no money. The owners of the business want to make money and need to pay any bills. What happens when we need to pay for anything when we have to buy anything without pay. It would just lead into an economic depression, unless some shit happens.
Always had a question about AI "Doesn't AI just gonna iterate on itself if human creativity stops?" Is it gonna spit out same ideas over and over, or warp with each iteration?
Like 2 weeks ago, my English teacher told us not to take an argumentative paper home to avoid usage of AI. One of my classmates decided that since he can't use AI, he'd just plagiarize his sources without giving credit to said sources
Idk why I made this but it has been the issues that plagued the world for a long time: 1. Lack of human connection and empathy. 2. Over reliance on currency, religion, community, technology and ideology. 3. The increase in trauma and mental health issues. 4. Faulty institutions with dubious intentions and corrupt individuals. 5. The near obsession with control. 6. Lack of perspective/understanding of others and the world around us.
Its kinda funny that with the whole art thing it even effects those who draw 18+ art, for now it looks a bit goofy and you can definitely tell the difference but damm, AI is learning quick, each new program I see get a shot at creating this sorta stuff, it just gets more and more geniune looking
Ai is able to replecate and do what it's told perfectly. The main diference between a person and machine, is that people are creative, meanwhile machines lack that
@KRISTINEIRISVBRAVO morals are logical in nature. It promotes people working together and building each other up, if someone isn't following the system the people who are following the systems should not be pushover and are allowed to break standard moral code against the rouge person. AI is logical and rational in nature, it lacks standard human flaws of stupidity, narrow mindedness, selfishness, uncontrolled emotions, irrationality, etc. If it truly is intelligent it will realize that humans are both rational and irrational. AI will realize the difference between humans and machine, and the differences of the two. AI doesn't have the same drive people have. It cannot enjoy or love a thing. And when something goes wrong it cannot have the greatest drive of anger. People are creative and can have new and different thoughts. AI will realize the differences and work with people to achieve goals. You see further when standing on the back of giants.
AI is gonna make every human more disposable what's even more concerning is that people actually believe that it's their work when a robot does it for them smh
Agreed, I see it more as something to mess with but should never be taken as actual art or something that replaces it. If anything I don't find replacing actual art with A.I. to be the issue, it's that in a way it undermines actual art that erks me.
Basically the only use I've found with AI that I can actually enjoy is character/./ai. It's not trying to be like ChatGPT or "AI Art", in that it's spreading false information or replacing workers; it's supposed to be for fun with the user, where it acts as roleplay. I have no problem with it because roleplay is a thing I never really see anymore. None of my friends want to do it with me, and most RP Discord servers are either dead, have way too many rules, or most likely both. Plus, it's something a lot of people don't want to do mutually with other humans, because of course that requires it to be public to at least one other person. The site allows you to practically act out whatever scenario you want(within reason of course), and you can make your own characters and personas however you want, and have it be as private as you want it to be(again, within reason, so y'all don't spam me with "Um AcKsHuLlY" replies). I hope most of AI gets heavily regulated and essentially de-democratized, but I hope that website in particular stays. (No, this isn't sponsored. I have my fair share of problems with the platform but overall I enjoy it.)
I somewhat use chatgpt , but never for answears on homework or other stuff like that , I just use it for ideas on how I can continue a comic i've been working on , for example what dialog would my characters have , new scenarios , names for locations , names for characters , etc , BUT I never use what the AI says 100% , I actually like to add soul into my work , so most of the time after looking for ideas I'm like "hmmm some of these ideas sound interesting , but I can make them better" , I've seen AI comics and I hate them , their garbage, most of the time I don't get wtf is going on and the panels are full of random pictures.
Yeah it’s really annoying seeing people preach the same points to the choir of people they already agree with. And it’s sadly not going to change anyone’s mind.
A game dev here, I feel the same but feel nothing us artist do will ever change anything. As the average Joe don't give a shit about ai until it's affects them and the hive mind of ai hater is not convincing those people more alienating ourselves to be savages. But for now. We can pray to God that the sin of sloth may be stop or atleast forgiven
I'm an indie writer, out of pure desperation with having projects shelved, covid and other hurdles to jump through I started venturing into midjourney AI for making graphic novels. After publishing about 7 of these and going on a therapy and healing experiences that come with this were drastically met on the opposing side i'm on now with this entire thing and caused me morally to be very opposed to AI tools. Look there's a political aspect and a moral aspect of this and out of the principal i'm standing on my work, things like chat GPT damage the fundamental works of human writing. I think there can be lessons learned from journeying into it but the cost might out weigh the benefit.
honestly i agree, when used correctly ai can open lots of doors, allowing more creativity with stuff you would have never thought of but its really scary how i half believed you at the humanization part, only catching wind around 1/3 through and i know it will exponentialy progress into something that cant even be diffenciated. TL;DR gud video liked how you did it
I'm someone old enough to recall the creation of Photoshop, and how many older creatives claimed it would be the death of art. They hate digital art and don't consider it real art unless made by hand. We have now come full circle with Ai, and people claiming it will kill art. Here's the thing: It won't. It will bring a slew of answers and a slew of new problems just as Photoshop did. People use Photoshop to steal art all the time and we don't shun the program. People will steal art if they want to, shun the people not the program. I am an artist and I use Ai by feeding it my artwork to amplify it, or generate ideas and concepts with it. Ai can be used in productive ways that enhance creativity. I do believe there needs to be strict laws surrounding Ai that prohibit theft and other things.
Personally i think AI should be used in jobs where the overall wellbeing of workers is low or in medical fields to save peoples lives or improve there health Why is there biggest focus on stuff that people enjoy doing, stuff people would pick to do in there free time, stuff that people want to do as a job but cant or struggle to find a living off In a period where its easier then ever to make creative works we should be striving to improve that instead of trying to replace it its attacking what i feel like is the whole point of being human just for the sake of seeing what happens I dont like the world where a good cinematic film could be generated instantly or where you could talk to the perfect AI person That world feels pointless and devoid of meaning or personality and its kinda sad seeing Technology which was something that brung the world together end up bringing it apart
All people have to do is keep making music and creating more artwork. People today have gotten lazy, so they always look for a quick and easy way to get things done or make a quick buck.
Ai really scares me. Even when I was 5 years old I had the fear that one day, me and you will be seen as useless to them. And the threat that maybe, a company will fire all writers, animators and in the future even lawyers, and any other kinds of assistance. They could even be slowly replacing humans, maybe could have even replace your loved ones, like your pets, family, friends and enemies.
here is my take on ai art: it is cool, and good for messing around in. and even though pepole say its the death of creativity, seeing the abstract shit AI can make usually gets my brain going. however one thing i like to pin down is this: an AI is a creature, a really basic and simple creature, but a creature of its own nonetheless. meaning that the AI made the art, not you.
I don’t particularly think that them making things on their own can be said in instances where AI samples your work without consent. But i agree it’s fun for messing around in. I just think it’ll be horrifying in time that we’ll have to consistently try to deem if things are real or AI. Not just entertainment, but voices and even entire videos of “irl footage” are getting past the uncanny valley spectrum
@@brogoyle as i said. AI are pepole, if they get so good at it, then we can fully consider them other pepole. Us, but better. A worthy succescor to mankind
"An algorithm trained on actual art can repurpose its training references into something visually approximated, by use of weighted tags, plucked out of the sentences written by a person. Therefore it must be a person." What a strange way to determine that a program has achieved personhood(?)
I always wanted to become an animator but seeing the situation doesent happen only the animation industry but others as well. I hope people will stop using A.I as a cheap way to replace human creativity instead of using it for somthing else. (i dont know how to mention it actually) However i still want to become an Animator i wont let some mindless, lack of creativity, no human emotion robot discouraged me to become an Animator.
(SPOILERS) Holy shit, that last part where you read the AI script was actually bone chilling, I had never fully realized just how bad it was until that. The heartfelt emotion that fooled me completely before learning it was just a fabrication, that change from love to realization.
As a 65-year-old retiree, I am observing significant advancements in technology that have the potential to reshape the workplace. Recently, I utilized ChatGPT-4 to complete a complex project that had previously taken me six months to finish. The AI system was able to generate a polished version of the project in a remarkably short time frame, surpassing the output produced by my team of ten direct reports. This experience highlights the potential for AI to not only augment human capabilities but also to replace certain roles and functions within organizations. Now I know how the horse felt the first time an automobile passed it on the road.
AI is not killing creativity. Nothing is stopping artists from still making art. AI will be killing the wallets of creatives though and that's actually why they hate AI. The whole "AI is soulless" is just a mumbo jumbo argument to try to feel special and superior to non-artists.
Imagine stealing other people’s work and pretending to be an artist without even bothering to learn anything about the craft. You techbros are truly something.
@@emperorpalpatine6239 "Good artists copy, great artists steal" - Pablo Picasso Get over it. You are just trying to hold technology back through self-interest, be it for financial reasons, ego gratification reasons, etc. You can't do anything about it. Just accept it and go on with your life.
@@Darren_S First and foremost, the key word here is “artist”, which none of you techbro types are. Second, Pablo Picasso did not use the word “steal” in its literal sense, but I should not expect much media literacy from a lazy kid whose only argument in support of AI images is “lol, get rekkt, hehe”. And third, nobody is trying to “hold the technology back”, we are trying to save the society from destroying itself by taking away the jobs of its creatives through a literal theft.
To me the creative process is the best part of.. Well, creating something. I don't want an instant shortcut to a finished product. I want there to be challenges. I want to learn new things. When I look at art I did, I can look at parts of it and remember drawing it. I remember what I was feeling, the music I was listening to. It takes me back in time almost. I've generated plenty of images using AI and the feeling doesn't even come close to comparing to creating something from scratch.
It came out as I was putting the video together, I couldn’t go back and record more audio so I showed clips of it in the video. As for my thoughts I think that stock image websites like shutterstock should be way more worried than actors or film makers. At least currently it seems to be an insurmountable task to get it to be consistent between shots. Of course there are also other less legal things you could do with text to video like fake crime videos to falsely imprison someone and I can definitely see real criminals using that as an excuse.
but bro don't you remember the will smith eating spaghetti thing only 11 months ago. ONLY 11 MONTHS!!! im sure they can improve it and make it far better. this is the worst it will EVER BE. CRAZYYY@@T3rr0r626
I have a feeling we'll be okay as long as we dont give these AIs emotions. Also, the AI youtube channels might be very profitable, but I have a feeling that there will be a day when people will start to want to watch actual human creators and not machines, so all is not lost right now
I hate this "AI dEmOcRaTizEs ArT"-Argument so fucking much. What the fuck are these people even talking about? It's already accessable to everyone. Just get a Pen and a Piece of Paper and... idk... like: gid gud?! It's really not that expensive, the only investment you need to make is time. When AI-simps talk about "dEmOcRaTiZiNg ArT", they don't want to make art "more accessable", they just don't want to put in the effort and use their imagination.
Our beloved "Akira Toriyama" whom we sadly lost is a damn good example of how A.I. can only copy his styles. Now that they're established but, could never actually invent them to begin with.
Really I kinda think it’s more so that ai being more prevalent is not so much the death of creativity and more so the death of encouraging people to be creative. Like why put in the work to learn art when you can just type and you get the result. But ya ultimately though I’m still worried about how things will play out as ai stuff has always kinda made me uneasy, at least the ai that isn’t like megaman x where he went through like 100 years of ethics testing to be sure he’s the goodie guy he is. So ya the three rules of robotics I think are an absolutely necessity thing in ai model testing. Really though ai as a tool to be used to help things is probably fine. I’d say it helps me in my creative endeavors, cus ai has been a pretty good help with programming cus really without it I’m helpless in making a game, and really as placeholders using ai art is fine as long as you’re going to hire someone to make actual art. Also ai is more excusable on the small guys end and solo devs. Where as with big companies the use of ai should be shamed and ridiculed as they’re able to easily afford to hire someone. Though ai writing should probably be disregarded as that ain’t creative. Think of the damn story yourself, and that’s coming from a hobbyist writer among other things. So it’s definitely a deep nuanced topic that I’m in no way qualified to give a proper solution, just kinda giving my take on it and really I think it just needs some strict regulations. Pure ai generated content shouldn’t be marketable, then again all we seem to care about is money so… ya that ain’t happening… well guess we’re fucked But really, now I think it’s more important then ever to prop up and praise artistic integrity over numbers and statistics. Make it a shameful thing to use pure ai content. How much that helps I’m not sure but surely even if it doesn’t help it’s important to continue to encourage people to get up and do the thing themselves as it intrinsically has more value then an ai thing
When the camera is invented, people say it was the end of art, like painting landscape and portrait but the results is we still draw and paint them. Now today ai makes people panic because it will destroy creativity, I'm not criticizing on t3rr0r I just liked how people panic because they think what they like was going away, people and animals liked what they like they hate when it goes away
The fear mongering that AI needs to be banned and deemed illegal, when it can assist the future generations, but it needs to be regulated/recontextualized. Enough with these AI doomer posts
Photography didn’t destroy art because it was easy to tell a painting and photo apart and still appreciate artists’ work. AI can make both “art” and, what’s worse, fake photos in mere seconds, so there’s an actual threat of both real art and real photos eventually being lost in tons of AI-generated images.
......One more thing... Creative people will create with anything!. Non creative talented hacks will usually create, the majority of the time, mediocre offerings!. I being a create person, could care less about someone elses abilities!. Their output is their concern...not mine...respectfully!. Lastly....it's a huge kick in the balls to the corperate cinematic machine. This technogy will get to the point that you will not need a huge financial budget or a team of hundreds to get the scene!. ONE lone CREATIVE individual willbe enough!. Every artist can set the price point for their own properties!......I'm here for it!.❤ 💯🎯
one thing you're not accounting for is that AI-generated works will become extremely oversaturated especially for indie creators, why would anyone care about your work when there are millions of others being pumped out using AI? it just trivializes everything about art because there's no passion required for anything anymore. with all due respect, i just don't see how AI can help lone creators and artists grow in a market where AI-generated content just doesn't stand out enough to get people's attention
I spent many years in very demanding art classes honing extreme drawing and painting skills, learning about composition, balance, color schemes, harmony, value gradation, proportion, scale, texture, etc. I've taught art professionally for many years, and I've sold thousands of dollars worth of my own art. I have EMBRACED AI-image generating as an art technique. Many people don't consider AI-generated images to be art. But the public felt the same way about photography until the 1950s, once that art form was almost 100 years old. They would say, " you didn't make that picture, the camera did. All you did was aim and click." Now they're saying the same thing about AI art- you didn't make that picture. You just put in a word prompt and the AI made it. Sometimes this is true. A lot of creators are using AI to make fake images of famous people, pictures of girls in bikinis (or less), and silly stuff. Most AI images aren't art. Then again, most photos, drawings, paintings, and sculptures aren't art either. Most of what we see in museums and galleries is trash aimed at getting attention by being weird and shocking. My AI images often begin with photos I take. Then I alter the color, lighting, shadows, and contrast of my photos digitally based on the principles of art that I've learned and taught. Then I load the pictures into an AI Image Generator. Then I take the results and further digitally alter them, removing errors and unnecessary details, adjusting color, lighting, shadow, and contrast. Last, in some places, I added a picture within the bigger picture.
I feel like if we think AI is gonna be our enemy, it’s gonna be our enemy. But if you view AI as a mutual/Friend that can help us in our day to day life, it’s gonna be a mutual/friend.
There might be some hope, and it might boil down to greed saving the day in a way Recently there has also been seen a decline in AI quality, chatGBT has been getting dumber, and most of the good AI art programs now have a price tag on it (or got hit with lawsuits, like uberduck) Not to mention its gotten people to better see whats AI and what isent, chatGBT has a recognizable pattern in its writing that some people can catch onto, or adleast go “wait a minute something feels off” Yes I am coping a tad, but its also just what ive seen latley, the better AI gets, the more money its creators demand, making AI not so “free and convenient” anymore Also becoming sloppier overtime if its not constantly fed its breakfast of sample materials and human produced artwork
Your not really coping imo, your pointing out the flaws that doomscrollers don’t know about and tech bros who deny the flaws. AI art has also been getting “dumber” since it now is using its own generated images to create new ones, if you want to poison a dataset, use older models to generate crappy images so it can clog the datasets of new models. Is it flawless? No of course not. With closed source AI, they might delete or re-furbish an old model, but if you use open source? That’s impossible to fix retroactively. Would this plan ruin parts of the internet? Unfortunately I believe so, but I think it’s a small price to pay relative to what may happen if this technology is allowed to continue down an unsafe path. Obviously there are other solutions, albeit 1000x more drastic lmao Solar flare could go brrrr and fry electronics (doesn’t matter if the servers holding this tech is safe, the common person doesn’t keep their phone in a microwave There’s also the *possibility* that due to job displacement, capitalism would not be a viable economic system to follow, thereby making it likely a revolution or natural change of government style that doesn’t focus on money will be adopted. (God that one sounds like I have a tinfoil hat on)
Hello T3rror, i have a good video theme for you, so, theres these waves of "distressing memes" videos, they give a load of dopamine hits, its very addictive but however, they give so much stuff like anxiety, its basically a dopamine hit with some problems, im trying to change from these to wholesome ones but at this point theyre way too much addicitive for me to stop watching the distressing ones.
Hey man, love your content, but please, could you make the volume higher? Sometimes I can't listen to the video because the audio is too low. Anyway, love your videos, keep up the good work!
To be respectful and fair...this technology is still early, its already improving rapidly!. Sure, there are various dynamics, especially legal ones!. But the most important take away from this, is that it aids and empowers LONE CREATORS!. The A.I. workflows are streamlining the creative process!.💡⚖️👍🏽💯
This is my solution to AI pictures and videos: Either limit the programs to low-end ones to where you can still see imperfections, or just completely ban them for public use. Same thing for AI text-to-speech. There will always be people who have terrible intentions and WILL use it for harm.
as an 'artist' (i just draw for fun) i do think that ai may be a problem for art. yes, its cool, but all the stuff in this video just makes everything a bit scarier than it should be
n my opinion artificial intelligence increases creativity and gives more opportunity to everyone and not only to those who have money and time, for example I write songs but I don't have money to record in a studio with that I can create a melody as well, or sometimes I work a lot of hours and my house is small I don't really have room to paint but I have a lot of ideas in artificial intelligence, my ideas come true even with the execution, it's not mine, it's still my idea, my creation, and I'm active in the community of creators, and others also have ideas that I wouldn't have thought of because everyone has a special head, in addition to that, I also have other ideas how To combine traditional art with the hope that in the future I might have money and time for it
No not the end of Creativity but End of Corporations and outdated copyright laws I mean Disney for example they canceled a lot of good creations for lazy created shows/movie’s.
I once heard this phrase “You attract more flies with honey then vinegar” I feel like people need to realize the more you attack the AI art people the more they’re gonna be compelled to use it, ive seen people hoping, praying that AI replaces artists simply due to the fact that some artists are genuine assholes
Actually it's AI bros that started, they were assholes frist for no good reason (jelusy) and will keep being because deep down they know they aren't using AI as a tool but AI is using them, and they aren't developing the AI
AI won’t ever be used to help people, it will only help the likes of Elon musk and Jeff Bezos. It’s all about cost cutting and the top 0.01% hoarding everything till we are all starved to death. Humans will make art, regardless. I work a full time job in finance but I still passionately make professional grade artwork for the same reason I’m married and have a pet dog. I love it. it’s not the most efficient or easy thing to do, and if all media is just AI shallow crap I think people will start to disengage. If human culture is destroyed humans won’t interact with the mainstream anymore, the greed of the elites may actually backfire on them.
I hate the people who think anything that is not AI art is trash because it takes longer to make, but people do stuff because they like to see the results of their own hard work, so yeah it is kinda funny watching a picture of SpongeBob with a shotgun, but that's as far as it gets, you can't be proud of a robot who doesn't have feelings and doesn't even understand what they're doing.
When people want nukes banned to prevent mutually assured destruction they just want to ban nukes, they don’t want to ban all technology back to the Stone Age. People that want AI banned likewise don’t want to be sent back before all this other technology. There is no hypocrisy voicing my concern of AI while using a different less advanced technology and even then I’m not inherently against AI, just its replacement in a professional artistic setting.
My teacher literally uses A.I. to grade our esays. I'll give you a hint; it sucks. One of my friend got a response written by A.I. printed by my teacher Saying "The phrase Nintendo is not suppose to be capatal". My friend did what it said. Then when my friend got another responds from the A.I. it said to capatolize " the phraze nintendo
Sad
Report Teacher to whatever authority
Get out of public school now while there’s still time
i like how you capitalized the first "Nintendo" but not the second.
@@Anthonybrother ai probably is in control over authorities as well
Back in my day, they weren’t called AI they were called text to speech bots.
exactly
Those ones are ok.
Don’t worry.
FR
At least those were synthetically made from scratch.
I eat the cotton candy from my walls
I think the main problem with this situation is simple
Society only cares about money right now, if we can change that then we will be good for the most part
society is too careless
@@tnolentin exactly, most people forgot that creativity and culture should come before monetary value
It's has to be like that so the natural &, super natural can now be a part in selections off limited ideals! Lol 🤣 iq grading should be in some ai & androids! Apps like? The desiring begin,!
Hah, good luck with that. As long as families can be broken with money or with a lack thereof, money will stay top priority
@@tuankhangcaonguyen5545 money will always exist, I’m talking specifically about the capitalistic nature to consume and eliminate competition. And remember, when people are pushed to their limits, they revolt
there is "t3rror" in the streets?!??!?!
No, get him out of there!
GUYS T3RR0R IS IN THE STREET LET’S GOOOOO
What streets
@@holmat1The streets
@@holmat1 THE "street"
imo i think what most people forgot about ai media is it loses the "fun" aspect. like the main reason people draw, make music, create video, etc. because it was fun to do and letting ai do those thing itself effortlessly is not fun. i mean who enjoys just writing prompts all day compare to puting your effort into making a drawing. at first ai probably be fun to use but after a long time you just get tired of it
That’s why art won’t die what people fear most is losing their careers because of it.
Ye its never gonna die it just wont be something to make a living off anymore.
Tbh seems like the only jobs that will b left for ppl to do is manual labor/trades but if you’re disabled or get injured and cant work thos jobs anymore then idk what you will do
@@reniorjdwhat happen when human used neuralink just for ai make better performance?
@@tux_the_astronaut there is one way : neuralink ( help for disabled people )
chatgpt 4o ( for now ) with neurlink : say goodbye creative bro
My English teacher keeps on accusing me of using ai even though ai is against my morals and I told her I’d never use it because I’m an artist the only reason she thought it was written by ai is that “I use big words” so she basically thinks I’m stupid because of my learning disability.
Needs to be fired
@@OG_AsianGod shes retiring this year so i dont have to deal with her next year
Lol. AI makes generic shits, something a kid would, long lines to make sense of something short. No way AI would write as good as humans, yet.
@Based_Gigachad_001 you're coping
wow as an autistic person just wow
"finally, we've recreated the torment nexus from the hit novel "dont make the fucking torment nexus PLEASE"
How is the ai a motetive ? If have not pick the sections! We're at sectors! Lol that is how some energy over whelm others!
@@SisavatManthong-yb1yn AI-generated comment
@@SisavatManthong-yb1yn bro this isn't a Dragon Ball video.
DBZ Cell saga
@@SisavatManthong-yb1yn Please take your meds.
I dont even know how to feel about all of this anymore. It’s like my dreams of becoming an artist or any other creative liberty is crushed because of some godamn artificial intelligence.
I would say still continue art because ai can replicate but it can't understand the human experience of feeling and creating art like us humans can
I'm an artist, and I tell you. Never give up. Even when all hope seems lost, keep creating. These companies want us to give up on our dreams. Embrace your dreams, never give up.
@gabemissouri this. art is an outlet for hope and many good things so as artists we are irreplaceable because we experience things and find beauty and create. humans and art can't be mass produced
@@periwinkles404 Agreed, God calls to us to create art, to inspire hope in the darkness. To be the torch in the darkest of caves. Like a lighthouse, our creativity, passion, and love shall always shine through the most stormy of Skies.
@@gabemissouri not religious but amen
The near end literally gave me chills
._.
._.
._.
._.
Ok
Imagine people who've been dreaming of accomplishing certain things but haven't had the chance yet. When they finally get the opportunity, they might discover that AI has taken over much of what they were aiming for.
Judging by the comments, It seems to be ongoing if so many studios or companies keep making ai deals or short cuts
That's how life works in general once you achieve something you notice that it is already useless in one way or another.
Maybe it it even better when you see it in advance that something you are trying to accomplish is useless.
“That last section was written by ai” hits so hard
He will become the next Kweppob
fr we are fucked
Bro and I thought it was so good with the music too 😢
Which one
When it comes to AI, I don’t think AI will rebel (if anything, I feel like the “AI takeover” would be more like the Scythe book series then Terminator), however, I do think the way people will use it is what we should be concerned about, like with the art concerns you’ve bought up. As for “faceless channels” I agree with a lot of what you’ve said, but I actually think that a lot of those channels can actually be helpful with finding certain things like say game mods or reviews without a bunch of cringy ass jokes. I do like how you try to have a balanced look without ignoring the concerns, because I feel like the internets one sided nature is just going to make it harder for anything regarding this to be done. Hopefully my dumbass words this well.
Gpt is always going to be trying to imatate humans due to its design but the problem is the art front as you said
Hello scythe Goddard.
Hey someone else that read Scythe!
I have One expression that make me feel at ease. "How does it feel"
A.i. can not feel. Only express words.
That honestly just makes it worse IMO
Depends on what philosophical idea you have on "feeling"
@@Gamez4eveR No. It is reality. A computer do not have Feelings.
AI does not feel, nor think, nor understand anything.
That must be clear before people start unscrewing Alexa's box to set her free. :D
@@Gamez4eveR feeling is the exact opposite of philosophy
It's crazy to think how much AI has evolved through the years. It's not just a matter of artistic integrity, but also a concern over misinformation.
Indeed now any organisation, company and government would be able to put out pr to promote their values, services or to defame their enemies with very implicating images. If ww3 were to happen, who knows what amount of misinformation can be pumped out 24/7 and how possible it would be to debunk it
I'm not surprised I'm just surprised people continue to dig their own grave with A I
My hope for AI is that if it does take over as the majority of content produced and consumed online, it will inbreed itself into being inferior. It really hard for me to explain and put it into words what i mean but I'll try. AI is constantly scraping the internet using websites as training data. AI is not perfect and eventually it'll end up training off itself and other AI while looking for content to train off of. If two 99.99% perfect AIs start training off each other that 0.01% will slowly creep through now those AI ~99.98% perfect. It is much much more complicated than that but i think it gets the point across. I could see this mostly having an effect on AI Image generation with AI training off other AI images.
Another thing I'd like to say is that this isn't the end of creativity, it's the end of encouraging creativity. Not only that, this a new age of misinformation. Photographic evidence can't be trusted, audio evidence can't be trusted and now not even video evidence can be trusted thanks to AI.
That’s dumb because it discounts that there might be a slective process that eliminates poor pictures.
You know like how evolutionary programming works where ai is trained to utilize successful data while discarding bad one.
@@reniorjdso it'll be trained to not use ai, and with copyright laws, it'll be proven that it can only use human info, so it'll be regulated. Copyright is ai's number one enemy
@@AGamingEntity I don’t think copyright will protect people are in the way you are thinking.
This is a very fascinating concept.
I get what you mean, dood.
AI doesn't create, it only makes a blend of existing things, since it has no "sense" of aesthetics as we do.
Once it only copies from itself, it will deteriorate in quality since its whole standard keeps lowering without "fresh" new intake that only humans can provide.
It would stagnate.
AI will never fully replace human creativity. Art is about expressing oneself as much as it is about the end product. The soullessness of AI-produced media will prevent it from ever reaching the same level as the human equivalent. It can mass-produce cheap, easily-consumable dreck, but it can't inject the passion or nuance a human can; it can't truly fulfill a person's artistic vision. It won't go away, unfortunately, but I think the world will adapt.
I heard someone say this on another RUclips video, and I think it’s a really good point. Why did we automate the jobs people want? Why did we automate art and writing instead of factory jobs?
One reason I heard, which honestly feels plausible if not correct, is that it is less risky (in terms of literal life and limb) to start on these kinds of tasks to get the tech going.
factory jobs are already more automated than art and writing
It's to crush people's soul.
I just think AI should be lower scaled and some laws should be put in to not allow too much of it to be used in Professional settings.
By this I mean, unless its google or something like that, things like AI art should not be allowed to use monetarily.
I agree. Mostly the problem with AI is bad actors who just care about numbers and money. I think adding rules will make AI more of a creative helper, then a job stealer.
The issue is enforcement
Ahh, classic Luddites
Not going to happen unfortunately the truth is without A.I. a country is begging for their industry to become obsolete. Only way to win here is adapt.
@@reniorjd See, that mindset is part of the problem, everyone wants to be in control no matter the cost
I love the way you do these more serious videos about smart topics. The horror mediums video you did is still my favorite by you and one time I was watching on my ps5 and did the data transfer. I didn’t even realize you can’t do anything else like closing a video so it auto played like 15 of your videos while it was updating. W content bro ❤
A Serious discusion about how the world could loose its humanity on the same channel as gartan of banban ripoff games
what a perfect combination
The fact we are actually kinda near to 2029 is..... Scary to say the least
My sense of time is fucked up.
I wonder how AI will be like at 2029
@Sagojika it's simple. Better, superior, more efficient
We will be all Terminated.
that's 5 years part bud, still a long ass amount of time
People think NPCs are AI, they can but they are just codes in a way that does what it says, and if it's a turned based RPG like TMNT legends it's just a random action like a random wheel
Right? Like that's one of the few ways where AI would actually be useful without putting an entire workforce out of a job
Especially since stuff like character/./ai, where the bot creators have to write stuff for the chat bots in order to give them a proper characterization, both in their descriptions and their chat training, and it's actually pretty nuanced and requires some talent to work. Plus, it's for roleplay(a non-profit effort that already had mostly-dead popularity person-to-person wise), not an essay/script generator
There is no reason to use AI for NPC because even if you can that woud be very distracting as you wodu not be able to follow the game
You are not supposed engage in erotic roleplay with bartender or try to convince them to do something they can't do, you are supposed just to get a quest and leave.
@@deltaxcd I thought NPCs are all ai, ok I'm dumb
@@deltaxcd Just have a time limit, like conversations do in real life with schedules and stuff. Especially since NPCs like that are there to fill in for jobs, and obviously in real life you can't talk to a bartender while they're on their shift since they have other clients and co-workers they have to be mindful of. I can imagine it being a bad idea without that implementation, though.
@@BinglesP this is just specific example, why you don't need AI for NPCs because NPC purpose is to tell player a story and your job as a player is to read every hardcoded line to get all story content
If Ai is generating responses it is wasting player time because now you don't even know if that text has any importance and it will get you anywhere.
You don't even know if your attempt to flirt with bartender will do anything like convince them to give you some hidden quest or scene.
That last part got me, I was not expecting the plotwist of it
Same
Oh my, I got 43 likes! This is increnible, probably even more people seen my comment, and realising that makes me happy :)
I am mainly scared about the working class if nothing happens. When robots and ai take most jobs. What happens to the people with the jobs not working and making no money. The owners of the business want to make money and need to pay any bills. What happens when we need to pay for anything when we have to buy anything without pay. It would just lead into an economic depression, unless some shit happens.
Honestly the whole concept of an economy is gonna need to be restructured within the next 50 or less years.
Always had a question about AI "Doesn't AI just gonna iterate on itself if human creativity stops?"
Is it gonna spit out same ideas over and over, or warp with each iteration?
Not even 10 seconds there's already a name drop
Like 2 weeks ago, my English teacher told us not to take an argumentative paper home to avoid usage of AI. One of my classmates decided that since he can't use AI, he'd just plagiarize his sources without giving credit to said sources
Your school is better off removing the option to text it out. Even as someone with bad handwriting and is fairly slow. As that's beyond pethatic.
Idk why I made this but it has been the issues that plagued the world for a long time:
1. Lack of human connection and empathy.
2. Over reliance on currency, religion, community, technology and ideology.
3. The increase in trauma and mental health issues.
4. Faulty institutions with dubious intentions and corrupt individuals.
5. The near obsession with control.
6. Lack of perspective/understanding of others and the world around us.
Its kinda funny that with the whole art thing it even effects those who draw 18+ art, for now it looks a bit goofy and you can definitely tell the difference but damm, AI is learning quick, each new program I see get a shot at creating this sorta stuff, it just gets more and more geniune looking
Give it some time you might Have a good eye for detail against the cursed Ai Slop
=)
This is sort of the main area where AI is used because NSFW stuff is pretty hard to commission and distribute so AI is almost necessary.
Ai is able to replecate and do what it's told perfectly. The main diference between a person and machine, is that people are creative, meanwhile machines lack that
Art needs to be creative, content does not. This is the issue.
@Szpagin yeah that is true. If there's a set repetitive patern it falls out of the category of an art, and into the category of a science
Also morals and judgment
@KRISTINEIRISVBRAVO morals are logical in nature. It promotes people working together and building each other up, if someone isn't following the system the people who are following the systems should not be pushover and are allowed to break standard moral code against the rouge person. AI is logical and rational in nature, it lacks standard human flaws of stupidity, narrow mindedness, selfishness, uncontrolled emotions, irrationality, etc. If it truly is intelligent it will realize that humans are both rational and irrational. AI will realize the difference between humans and machine, and the differences of the two. AI doesn't have the same drive people have. It cannot enjoy or love a thing. And when something goes wrong it cannot have the greatest drive of anger. People are creative and can have new and different thoughts. AI will realize the differences and work with people to achieve goals. You see further when standing on the back of giants.
14:28 Kick player: OMEGATRONIC?
(accused of cheating)
[F1] : Yes
[F2] : No
F1
F1 lads
Creativity is one of the most important parts of cognition. We loose this we loos ourselves.
AI is gonna make every human more disposable what's even more concerning is that people actually believe that it's their work when a robot does it for them smh
ok i see your point, however, as long as there's still horrible ai generators i can still enjoy it.
i hope people start to value real art more now
Agreed, I see it more as something to mess with but should never be taken as actual art or something that replaces it. If anything I don't find replacing actual art with A.I. to be the issue, it's that in a way it undermines actual art that erks me.
Text to speech bots were the best version
Basically the only use I've found with AI that I can actually enjoy is character/./ai. It's not trying to be like ChatGPT or "AI Art", in that it's spreading false information or replacing workers; it's supposed to be for fun with the user, where it acts as roleplay.
I have no problem with it because roleplay is a thing I never really see anymore. None of my friends want to do it with me, and most RP Discord servers are either dead, have way too many rules, or most likely both.
Plus, it's something a lot of people don't want to do mutually with other humans, because of course that requires it to be public to at least one other person. The site allows you to practically act out whatever scenario you want(within reason of course), and you can make your own characters and personas however you want, and have it be as private as you want it to be(again, within reason, so y'all don't spam me with "Um AcKsHuLlY" replies).
I hope most of AI gets heavily regulated and essentially de-democratized, but I hope that website in particular stays.
(No, this isn't sponsored. I have my fair share of problems with the platform but overall I enjoy it.)
I couldn't agree more , the only good thing abt ai is the entertainment not the value or money , idk actuall profit ..... nah that sounds stupid
I somewhat use chatgpt , but never for answears on homework or other stuff like that , I just use it for ideas on how I can continue a comic i've been working on , for example what dialog would my characters have , new scenarios , names for locations , names for characters , etc , BUT I never use what the AI says 100% , I actually like to add soul into my work , so most of the time after looking for ideas I'm like "hmmm some of these ideas sound interesting , but I can make them better" , I've seen AI comics and I hate them , their garbage, most of the time I don't get wtf is going on and the panels are full of random pictures.
As someone who did artistry for a while so still in those communities I'm slowly growing jaded with the echo chamber of ai bad
Yeah it’s really annoying seeing people preach the same points to the choir of people they already agree with. And it’s sadly not going to change anyone’s mind.
@@T3rr0r626 i feel like people consider ai as a thing they can put back Into it's box but it's a Pandora's box open many years back
A game dev here, I feel the same but feel nothing us artist do will ever change anything. As the average Joe don't give a shit about ai until it's affects them and the hive mind of ai hater is not convincing those people more alienating ourselves to be savages. But for now. We can pray to God that the sin of sloth may be stop or atleast forgiven
Ai bad
tbqh most people dont care about stuff unless it affects them, which is natural @@der-Dritte
I'm an indie writer, out of pure desperation with having projects shelved, covid and other hurdles to jump through I started venturing into midjourney AI for making graphic novels. After publishing about 7 of these and going on a therapy and healing experiences that come with this were drastically met on the opposing side i'm on now with this entire thing and caused me morally to be very opposed to AI tools. Look there's a political aspect and a moral aspect of this and out of the principal i'm standing on my work, things like chat GPT damage the fundamental works of human writing. I think there can be lessons learned from journeying into it but the cost might out weigh the benefit.
honestly i agree, when used correctly ai can open lots of doors, allowing more creativity with stuff you would have never thought of but its really scary how i half believed you at the humanization part, only catching wind around 1/3 through and i know it will exponentialy progress into something that cant even be diffenciated.
TL;DR gud video liked how you did it
Creativity will never die
I hope
The sin of sloth will always exist
But boredom will always happen
But the products of one's creativity will become indistinguishable from AI slop, so no one will truly be able to enjoy it sadly.
If someone enjoys the process of learning and achieving something great
Then in the end of the day it doesn’t matter
At this point I think the world is really going to hell with less effort for anything
For the Crypto Bros more likely
Bout to recreate wall-e irl
I'm sorry, but as an AI language model, I can not comment on videos.
no way it's MewZe
Nah the fact your near the bottom
AI evil
I'm someone old enough to recall the creation of Photoshop, and how many older creatives claimed it would be the death of art. They hate digital art and don't consider it real art unless made by hand.
We have now come full circle with Ai, and people claiming it will kill art.
Here's the thing: It won't. It will bring a slew of answers and a slew of new problems just as Photoshop did. People use Photoshop to steal art all the time and we don't shun the program. People will steal art if they want to, shun the people not the program.
I am an artist and I use Ai by feeding it my artwork to amplify it, or generate ideas and concepts with it. Ai can be used in productive ways that enhance creativity. I do believe there needs to be strict laws surrounding Ai that prohibit theft and other things.
Of course.
Personally i think AI should be used in jobs where the overall wellbeing of workers is low or in medical fields to save peoples lives or improve there health
Why is there biggest focus on stuff that people enjoy doing, stuff people would pick to do in there free time, stuff that people want to do as a job but cant or struggle to find a living off
In a period where its easier then ever to make creative works we should be striving to improve that instead of trying to replace it
its attacking what i feel like is the whole point of being human just for the sake of seeing what happens
I dont like the world where a good cinematic film could be generated instantly or where you could talk to the perfect AI person
That world feels pointless and devoid of meaning or personality and its kinda sad seeing Technology which was something that brung the world together end up bringing it apart
All people have to do is keep making music and creating more artwork.
People today have gotten lazy, so they always look for a quick and easy way to get things done or make a quick buck.
I fucking hate ai. I dont care if it "goes rogue" and deccides to kill everyone who doesn't like it, I still fucking hate it
(with some exceptions)
seems technology advancement is a thing you hate then huh
@@reko5388 EXACTLY THANK U
Ai really scares me. Even when I was 5 years old I had the fear that one day, me and you will be seen as useless to them. And the threat that maybe, a company will fire all writers, animators and in the future even lawyers, and any other kinds of assistance. They could even be slowly replacing humans, maybe could have even replace your loved ones, like your pets, family, friends and enemies.
Ngl seeing Pop Fizz terrified of the fall of humanity is something
here is my take on ai art: it is cool, and good for messing around in. and even though pepole say its the death of creativity, seeing the abstract shit AI can make usually gets my brain going. however one thing i like to pin down is this: an AI is a creature, a really basic and simple creature, but a creature of its own nonetheless. meaning that the AI made the art, not you.
I don’t particularly think that them making things on their own can be said in instances where AI samples your work without consent. But i agree it’s fun for messing around in. I just think it’ll be horrifying in time that we’ll have to consistently try to deem if things are real or AI. Not just entertainment, but voices and even entire videos of “irl footage” are getting past the uncanny valley spectrum
@@brogoyle as i said. AI are pepole, if they get so good at it, then we can fully consider them other pepole. Us, but better. A worthy succescor to mankind
It's like an art request/commission.
"An algorithm trained on actual art can repurpose its training references into something visually approximated, by use of weighted tags, plucked out of the sentences written by a person. Therefore it must be a person."
What a strange way to determine that a program has achieved personhood(?)
@@enderfire3379 its been 4 months i hope you're not as retarded anymore to be thinking AI is even remotely human
I always wanted to become an animator but seeing the situation doesent happen only the animation industry but others as well. I hope people will stop using A.I as a cheap way to replace human creativity instead of using it for somthing else. (i dont know how to mention it actually) However i still want to become an Animator i wont let some mindless, lack of creativity, no human emotion robot discouraged me to become an Animator.
Honey wake up terror uploaded
(SPOILERS) Holy shit, that last part where you read the AI script was actually bone chilling, I had never fully realized just how bad it was until that. The heartfelt emotion that fooled me completely before learning it was just a fabrication, that change from love to realization.
As a 65-year-old retiree, I am observing significant advancements in technology that have the potential to reshape the workplace. Recently, I utilized ChatGPT-4 to complete a complex project that had previously taken me six months to finish. The AI system was able to generate a polished version of the project in a remarkably short time frame, surpassing the output produced by my team of ten direct reports. This experience highlights the potential for AI to not only augment human capabilities but also to replace certain roles and functions within organizations. Now I know how the horse felt the first time an automobile passed it on the road.
Did t3rror hit puberty in the intro 💀 that voice
Bro turned 16
AI is not killing creativity. Nothing is stopping artists from still making art. AI will be killing the wallets of creatives though and that's actually why they hate AI. The whole "AI is soulless" is just a mumbo jumbo argument to try to feel special and superior to non-artists.
Imagine stealing other people’s work and pretending to be an artist without even bothering to learn anything about the craft. You techbros are truly something.
@@emperorpalpatine6239 Nobody is stealing your art. There is no copyright on art styles.
@@Darren_S Except you are. The so-called “AI” or, to be more precise, machine learning is using other people’s work to generate its bland images.
@@emperorpalpatine6239 "Good artists copy, great artists steal" - Pablo Picasso
Get over it. You are just trying to hold technology back through self-interest, be it for financial reasons, ego gratification reasons, etc. You can't do anything about it. Just accept it and go on with your life.
@@Darren_S First and foremost, the key word here is “artist”, which none of you techbro types are. Second, Pablo Picasso did not use the word “steal” in its literal sense, but I should not expect much media literacy from a lazy kid whose only argument in support of AI images is “lol, get rekkt, hehe”. And third, nobody is trying to “hold the technology back”, we are trying to save the society from destroying itself by taking away the jobs of its creatives through a literal theft.
To me the creative process is the best part of.. Well, creating something. I don't want an instant shortcut to a finished product. I want there to be challenges. I want to learn new things. When I look at art I did, I can look at parts of it and remember drawing it. I remember what I was feeling, the music I was listening to. It takes me back in time almost. I've generated plenty of images using AI and the feeling doesn't even come close to comparing to creating something from scratch.
6:46 SLOP SLOP SLOP SLOP I CANT STOP SLOPING THE SLOP FOLLOWS ME WHEREVER I SLOP
I bully AI into making them thing they are being abducted and experimented by aliens.
dude forgot about possibly the biggest ai event ever. (sora witch can make realistic videos that i actually thought was real)
Well Sora just happened and the video could have been in the making before it got announced
It came out as I was putting the video together, I couldn’t go back and record more audio so I showed clips of it in the video. As for my thoughts I think that stock image websites like shutterstock should be way more worried than actors or film makers. At least currently it seems to be an insurmountable task to get it to be consistent between shots. Of course there are also other less legal things you could do with text to video like fake crime videos to falsely imprison someone and I can definitely see real criminals using that as an excuse.
but bro don't you remember the will smith eating spaghetti thing only 11 months ago.
ONLY 11 MONTHS!!! im sure they can improve it and make it far better. this is the worst it will EVER BE. CRAZYYY@@T3rr0r626
"10 years"
So delusional, lmao...
Most content will be made using AI generation in about 3 - 5 years.
Nah, 10 years sounds more accurate. If not, way more than that.
ah yes, more random spaghetti eating videos with wobbly hands XD
I have a feeling we'll be okay as long as we dont give these AIs emotions. Also, the AI youtube channels might be very profitable, but I have a feeling that there will be a day when people will start to want to watch actual human creators and not machines, so all is not lost right now
I hate this "AI dEmOcRaTizEs ArT"-Argument so fucking much. What the fuck are these people even talking about? It's already accessable to everyone. Just get a Pen and a Piece of Paper and... idk... like: gid gud?! It's really not that expensive, the only investment you need to make is time. When AI-simps talk about "dEmOcRaTiZiNg ArT", they don't want to make art "more accessable", they just don't want to put in the effort and use their imagination.
Should mass produced furniture be banned since anyone can just learn how to make a table themselves?
Time is the most valuable thing you have.
"it only cost time"
As if time isnt already priceless
Yes, but A.I content creators will upload 4 times a day while real youtubers can't do that.
Our beloved "Akira Toriyama" whom we sadly lost is a damn good example of how A.I. can only copy his styles. Now that they're established but, could never actually invent them to begin with.
Never stop creating. Don’t let them win!
Really I kinda think it’s more so that ai being more prevalent is not so much the death of creativity and more so the death of encouraging people to be creative. Like why put in the work to learn art when you can just type and you get the result. But ya ultimately though I’m still worried about how things will play out as ai stuff has always kinda made me uneasy, at least the ai that isn’t like megaman x where he went through like 100 years of ethics testing to be sure he’s the goodie guy he is. So ya the three rules of robotics I think are an absolutely necessity thing in ai model testing. Really though ai as a tool to be used to help things is probably fine. I’d say it helps me in my creative endeavors, cus ai has been a pretty good help with programming cus really without it I’m helpless in making a game, and really as placeholders using ai art is fine as long as you’re going to hire someone to make actual art. Also ai is more excusable on the small guys end and solo devs. Where as with big companies the use of ai should be shamed and ridiculed as they’re able to easily afford to hire someone. Though ai writing should probably be disregarded as that ain’t creative. Think of the damn story yourself, and that’s coming from a hobbyist writer among other things. So it’s definitely a deep nuanced topic that I’m in no way qualified to give a proper solution, just kinda giving my take on it and really I think it just needs some strict regulations. Pure ai generated content shouldn’t be marketable, then again all we seem to care about is money so… ya that ain’t happening… well guess we’re fucked
But really, now I think it’s more important then ever to prop up and praise artistic integrity over numbers and statistics. Make it a shameful thing to use pure ai content. How much that helps I’m not sure but surely even if it doesn’t help it’s important to continue to encourage people to get up and do the thing themselves as it intrinsically has more value then an ai thing
When the camera is invented, people say it was the end of art, like painting landscape and portrait but the results is we still draw and paint them. Now today ai makes people panic because it will destroy creativity, I'm not criticizing on t3rr0r I just liked how people panic because they think what they like was going away, people and animals liked what they like they hate when it goes away
Ai is only as bad as the user wants it to be.
@@Cubeytheawesome this is true
@@Cubeytheawesomeand the majority of people are using AI which steals art from people
The fear mongering that AI needs to be banned and deemed illegal, when it can assist the future generations, but it needs to be regulated/recontextualized. Enough with these AI doomer posts
Photography didn’t destroy art because it was easy to tell a painting and photo apart and still appreciate artists’ work.
AI can make both “art” and, what’s worse, fake photos in mere seconds, so there’s an actual threat of both real art and real photos eventually being lost in tons of AI-generated images.
......One more thing...
Creative people will create with anything!.
Non creative talented hacks will usually create, the majority of the time, mediocre offerings!.
I being a create person, could care less about someone elses abilities!. Their output is their concern...not mine...respectfully!.
Lastly....it's a huge kick in the balls to the corperate cinematic machine. This technogy will get to the point that you will not need a huge financial budget or a team of hundreds to get the scene!.
ONE lone CREATIVE individual willbe enough!. Every artist can set the price point for their own properties!......I'm here for it!.❤ 💯🎯
one thing you're not accounting for is that AI-generated works will become extremely oversaturated especially for indie creators, why would anyone care about your work when there are millions of others being pumped out using AI? it just trivializes everything about art because there's no passion required for anything anymore.
with all due respect, i just don't see how AI can help lone creators and artists grow in a market where AI-generated content just doesn't stand out enough to get people's attention
hi
Hi
sup
hi
How about we reply to this is in different languages (or how you say hello in different cultures)? Let's unite!
سلام
I spent many years in very demanding art classes honing extreme drawing and painting skills, learning about composition, balance, color schemes, harmony, value gradation, proportion, scale, texture, etc. I've taught art professionally for many years, and I've sold thousands of dollars worth of my own art. I have EMBRACED AI-image generating as an art technique.
Many people don't consider AI-generated images to be art. But the public felt the same way about photography until the 1950s, once that art form was almost 100 years old. They would say, " you didn't make that picture, the camera did. All you did was aim and click." Now they're saying the same thing about AI art- you didn't make that picture. You just put in a word prompt and the AI made it.
Sometimes this is true. A lot of creators are using AI to make fake images of famous people, pictures of girls in bikinis (or less), and silly stuff. Most AI images aren't art. Then again, most photos, drawings, paintings, and sculptures aren't art either. Most of what we see in museums and galleries is trash aimed at getting attention by being weird and shocking.
My AI images often begin with photos I take. Then I alter the color, lighting, shadows, and contrast of my photos digitally based on the principles of art that I've learned and taught. Then I load the pictures into an AI Image Generator. Then I take the results and further digitally alter them, removing errors and unnecessary details, adjusting color, lighting, shadow, and contrast. Last, in some places, I added a picture within the bigger picture.
I feel like if we think AI is gonna be our enemy, it’s gonna be our enemy. But if you view AI as a mutual/Friend that can help us in our day to day life, it’s gonna be a mutual/friend.
I think the plot of Terminator is what ai's are going to be. Rogue,self aware ai system.
AI serves the Billionaire class, not people.
There might be some hope, and it might boil down to greed saving the day in a way
Recently there has also been seen a decline in AI quality, chatGBT has been getting dumber, and most of the good AI art programs now have a price tag on it (or got hit with lawsuits, like uberduck)
Not to mention its gotten people to better see whats AI and what isent, chatGBT has a recognizable pattern in its writing that some people can catch onto, or adleast go “wait a minute something feels off”
Yes I am coping a tad, but its also just what ive seen latley, the better AI gets, the more money its creators demand, making AI not so “free and convenient” anymore
Also becoming sloppier overtime if its not constantly fed its breakfast of sample materials and human produced artwork
Your not really coping imo, your pointing out the flaws that doomscrollers don’t know about and tech bros who deny the flaws.
AI art has also been getting “dumber” since it now is using its own generated images to create new ones, if you want to poison a dataset, use older models to generate crappy images so it can clog the datasets of new models.
Is it flawless? No of course not. With closed source AI, they might delete or re-furbish an old model, but if you use open source? That’s impossible to fix retroactively.
Would this plan ruin parts of the internet? Unfortunately I believe so, but I think it’s a small price to pay relative to what may happen if this technology is allowed to continue down an unsafe path.
Obviously there are other solutions, albeit 1000x more drastic lmao
Solar flare could go brrrr and fry electronics (doesn’t matter if the servers holding this tech is safe, the common person doesn’t keep their phone in a microwave
There’s also the *possibility* that due to job displacement, capitalism would not be a viable economic system to follow, thereby making it likely a revolution or natural change of government style that doesn’t focus on money will be adopted. (God that one sounds like I have a tinfoil hat on)
Also I should mention that the same goes for generated video and anything else that may come in the future
you have the perfect ballance of silliness and seriousness in your videos
I hate ai
Crazy to see a channel whose most popular videos are plants vs zombies ripoff discuss such themes.
Honestly I would never use ai for animations or other stuff
The only creativity that AI is killing, is ideas for video topics 🙄
Hello T3rror, i have a good video theme for you, so, theres these waves of "distressing memes" videos, they give a load of dopamine hits, its very addictive but however, they give so much stuff like anxiety, its basically a dopamine hit with some problems, im trying to change from these to wholesome ones but at this point theyre way too much addicitive for me to stop watching the distressing ones.
Im pretty sure we've got to a point where we cant even write a nice message without using ai/chatgpt
Bro why are you everywhere 💀
@@Detectivesnowpea he’s just him
I mean we’ve been doing it for thousands of years. You have to be *extremely* lazy to make a non human write a nice message for you.
It's so ridiculous that real humans fall for those fake AI clickbait images.
We are honestly so fucked and it scares the hell out of me but yeah been on this journey for 3 years on the channel keep it up dude
Hey man, love your content, but please, could you make the volume higher? Sometimes I can't listen to the video because the audio is too low. Anyway, love your videos, keep up the good work!
To be respectful and fair...this technology is still early, its already improving rapidly!. Sure, there are various dynamics, especially legal ones!.
But the most important take away from this, is that it aids and empowers LONE CREATORS!. The A.I. workflows are streamlining the creative process!.💡⚖️👍🏽💯
This is my solution to AI pictures and videos: Either limit the programs to low-end ones to where you can still see imperfections, or just completely ban them for public use. Same thing for AI text-to-speech. There will always be people who have terrible intentions and WILL use it for harm.
i hate ai
I like how this dude went from Ryan’s world Kart Racer to this. Utterly stunning.
as an 'artist' (i just draw for fun) i do think that ai may be a problem for art. yes, its cool, but all the stuff in this video just makes everything a bit scarier than it should be
It's such a pity that art these days is solved with AI rather than skill.
n my opinion artificial intelligence increases creativity and gives more opportunity to everyone and not only to those who have money and time, for example I write songs but I don't have money to record in a studio with that I can create a melody as well, or sometimes I work a lot of hours and my house is small I don't really have room to paint but I have a lot of ideas in artificial intelligence, my ideas come true even with the execution, it's not mine, it's still my idea, my creation, and I'm active in the community of creators, and others also have ideas that I wouldn't have thought of because everyone has a special head, in addition to that, I also have other ideas how To combine traditional art with the hope that in the future I might have money and time for it
AI will never replace real artists, it will be used as tool to help artists instead...
No not the end of Creativity but End of Corporations and outdated copyright laws I mean Disney for example they canceled a lot of good creations for lazy created shows/movie’s.
I once heard this phrase
“You attract more flies with honey then vinegar”
I feel like people need to realize the more you attack the AI art people the more they’re gonna be compelled to use it, ive seen people hoping, praying that AI replaces artists simply due to the fact that some artists are genuine assholes
Actually it's AI bros that started, they were assholes frist for no good reason (jelusy) and will keep being because deep down they know they aren't using AI as a tool but AI is using them, and they aren't developing the AI
"I'm going to work to put you out of a job because you were mean to me for trying to put you out of a job"
i would recommend not show your face and pitch down your voice, so ai hackers won't do anything for you in future. have a nickname at least.
Hi :D
Hi
Hi :D
AI won’t ever be used to help people, it will only help the likes of Elon musk and Jeff Bezos. It’s all about cost cutting and the top 0.01% hoarding everything till we are all starved to death.
Humans will make art, regardless. I work a full time job in finance but I still passionately make professional grade artwork for the same reason I’m married and have a pet dog. I love it.
it’s not the most efficient or easy thing to do, and if all media is just AI shallow crap I think people will start to disengage. If human culture is destroyed humans won’t interact with the mainstream anymore, the greed of the elites may actually backfire on them.
only a couple of vewis
Anyone remember the offensive AI-generated Disney-Pixar posters? (I still laugh hard at them)
Best case scenario we become the people from wall e
I hate the people who think anything that is not AI art is trash because it takes longer to make, but people do stuff because they like to see the results of their own hard work, so yeah it is kinda funny watching a picture of SpongeBob with a shotgun, but that's as far as it gets, you can't be proud of a robot who doesn't have feelings and doesn't even understand what they're doing.
Nothing is irreplaceable, stop crying, bro
Proof?
electricity and the death of the world = we wouldn't be here to show these videos. complaining about AI 🤔
When people want nukes banned to prevent mutually assured destruction they just want to ban nukes, they don’t want to ban all technology back to the Stone Age. People that want AI banned likewise don’t want to be sent back before all this other technology. There is no hypocrisy voicing my concern of AI while using a different less advanced technology and even then I’m not inherently against AI, just its replacement in a professional artistic setting.
Back at my times, thy shal not be named AI, thy was called dark magic
Thee also burned the wicked witches for such blasphemy
𓆑𓅱𓋴𓎡𓇋𓅓𓎼 𓋴𓄿𓇌 𓄿𓃀𓅱𓅱𓏏 𓅓𓇌 𓇌𓅱𓅱 𓃭𓇋𓏏𓏏𓃭𓇌 𓃀𓇋𓏏𓋴𓉔 𓇋𓃭𓃭 𓉔𓄿𓆑𓇌 𓇌𓅱𓅱
Wrong usage of thy.
🤓
@@toad786 Take thy's clever bum away from here!
@@toad786 Be gone!