I don’t care what sport is your favorite hockey, football, baseball, or basketball. The refs really need to be fined or suspended for making such horrible calls.
Great video!!! Sickening subject matter. I'm a Buffalonian. The "No Goal" I still can't rewatch. Also, I don't remember the year. It was playoffs. Ottawa at Buffalo. Senator right winger comes up the right side CLEAR AS DAY OFFSIDE. Dominek Hasek in net relaxed his stance waiting for the whistle that never sounded. Winger continued in...shot, scored. Hasek (and team) dejected. Hasek never regained composure....as if he was saying "What a bunch of B.S. ...to hell with this". Sabres looked dejected from there on our and lost the series. Someone should police the refs!!!
Gotta be some AI-generated thing leveraging a voice. I am pretty sure that's possible. I've seen it on crime and cop videos that are posted on here a lot. Obvious mispronunciation in them. Either that, or this guy doesn't watch Hockey, which can't be, right? This IS a channel called Slapshot after all.
In Holland, football referees are required to meet the press afterwards to discuss the calls they made during the match. In rugby union, in referees are miked up and in real time you can hear the discussions with the booth and the players.
For the Gretzky-Gilmour no-call. Rules at the time assessed an automatic ejection for a high-stick that drew blood. Gretzky wouldn’t have been in the box, he would have been out of the game.
Keep in mind though the referee kerry Fraser didn’t actually see it….so he went to his linesmen for help….i think on e them saw it…problem was did they eat this one……Fraser did the right thing by asking for help….which linesman protected Gretzky is the next question…
@@danielsworld8832 No he wasn't. There's no way he didn't see that play. The puck was no where near Gretzky/Gilmour when the stick went up and Gilmour went down. There's not 1 ref/linesman that should have missed that. But, there was no way anybody was Kicking Gretzky out of the game, even in Toronto
Yes, and the Leafs would have won vs the Habs. LA didn't belong in the finals at all. It was a script from Bettman, just like he did with their new kid at Vegas. That guy needs to go, FAST.
On the Brett Hull goal, the NHL justified it by saying that the puck entered the crease first, then Hull entered the crease and took a shot. The goalie made the initial save and the puck left the crease after the rebound, Hull got the puck back on his own rebound and shot it in the net. They said that getting your own rebound is not a loss of possession so Hull was fine still being in the crease even though the puck left the crease during the play. I am not saying I agree with that, but that was the justification they used. Is getting your own rebound a loss of possession... I don't know if the definition of losing possession goes into that kind of detail or not. It sounds like grasping at straws, but I honestly don't know. Anyway, the whole crease rule at that time was stupid anyway. I am glad that this incident made them change it back. There were so many goals called back that season because the tip of a skate was in the crease that didn't affect the play in an era where fans were begging for more goals.
This is correct. You were allowed to be in the crease with possession, so without Buffalo gaining possession, Hull technically never lost it. It was just a bad case of the spirit of the rule not matching the letter of the rule.
I'm honestly just tired of it being called controversial. He's barely in the crease while pivoting on his edges. Makes no contact with Hasek, and recovering a rebound. Think it's just butthurt Buffalo fans tbh.
Dude u know as well as I and every hockey fan that when it comes to bettmen if u don't listen to want he wants called and not called refs will lose there jobs that s.o.b. has his hand in every decision and call made he's an absolute Is bias judgmental Hypocritical Anti canadian prick oh and absolute Power controlling freak the day he finally calls it Quits I will celebrate and party for a bloody month singing " high ho the wicked ass hole is YYYEEEAAAHHH BBBAAABBBYYY 🎉!!
@XxNoMErcY99xX 1. That has never happened in the history of the league. 2. Even if it did, it would be a penalty. It's no different then a goalie coming out to play the puck. It's 1 thing to tap a goalie while outside the crease but something completely different to hit, or drag, a goalie. If they called a goal off for a goalie being touched outside the crease, goalies would constantly be outside the crease making sure to get tapped by somebody.
@@XxNoMErcY99xX he got dragged cause he forced it to happen skater skating towards the boards and leg got caught in between pads when he was skating that way making the move then price stick his pads up while he was trying to get out he was dragged cause of momentum of where he was skating how is that interference you goalies try to get every damn weak call in the book
As a Calgary albertan I can’t tell you how mad that non-goal call makes me I’ve literally been thinking about it since it happened 19 years ago, watched it live with my dad and we were screaming
correction, the high stick in LA vs Toronto was game 6. toronto just got beaten in game 7 and complains about it as though the high stick was in game 7. the flames one, given the camera angle, and the puck not being on the ice? i'm not actually convinced it went in. it would need to be clear from a directly top down view. which doesn't show it clearly fully over the line. therefore, no goal. the angle being used to show it as a goal i believe suffers from what is called the "parallax effect", which is a distortion in perception between what you see and actual positions
@@jeffreycairns767 fair enough. I didn't watch it. I wasn't even alive yet. I was going off a video from UrinatingTree that stated "Gretzky dominated them on their home ice." Which I took to mean that Toronto had imploded in a game 7, as they are want to do
It’s pretty ironic how the number 1 WORST call on this video is the only one that was legal. I love to see that Sabres fans are still crying about it though
@@matthewcheevers4861while it was legal, it wasn't public information not was it informed to the teams prior to the incident. This prompted them to say they changed the rule without telling anyone. Terrible decision by the higher ups, the controversy will go on forever because if they really changed the rules and the goal was legal, they should have stated that before the game/series/playoffs in general
I was born & raised in Edmonton so this is hard to say. *Gretzky clearly cut Gilmour, end of story* What's possibly worse is that if the Leafs had won the series we would have had a *Toronto / Montreal Stanley Cup final*
The Preds vs Penguins call isn’t necessarily BAD, it’s just annoying. From the refs perspective it looked like he had covered the puck, and so he blew the whistle to stop the play.
@@jeffreycairns767depends on what you see and how the goalie reacts. Murray definitely locked up trying not to move thinking the puck was in his gear. The ref sees that and quick whistle. Other times when the goalie is still looking around or moving it will be a delayed whistle until the ref decides it is covered
@davidwaxter66 I get that but you have to admit, there have been many, many times that a whistle barely touches a goalie and the whistle blows while other times, it's clear the puck is smothered yet still takes 5+ seconds to blow it dead. The average whistle I agree with you but I'm not talking the average whistle.
2024 game 6 second round, McDavid (aka McSlashy), Captian of the Oilers cut the face of Canusks Captian Hughes . No call double two minute right in front the ref. To rub it in they made Hughes leave the ice for bleeding.
There was a call in game 5 between Canucks and Oilers that should make your next list. Pettersson of the Canucks clears the puck out of his end and an Oiler skates into the back of him and falls, Pettersson get called for charging and he was standing still. Nice to see your referees were the usual suspects. Better put Kelly Sutherland into that mix of referees.
@@theultra5482 A statue that hops to get the center of gravity of something is about to demolish it, maybe. Your feet cannot leave the ice in any manner when contact is being made. It is a cheap shot, a dangerous play, and clearly a an aspect of charging that needs to be removed from the game, hence why it is called a penalty practically every time it happens these days. The real truth was Petterson has zero physical presence. Instead of standing his ground and doing a reverse check or taking the body to make a play he jumped using the player's own momentum against him. IMO that type of play is equivalent to ducking a check near the boards. Its weak af. Petterson should be embarrassed by the performance he put up this post season. That was a great call , charging all day
@@dannyjackson5356 like be honest I think it was a bit of a weak call but by definition it is a penalty. Lots of worse ones are let go in the playoffs though.
If I recall, that Nashville call is what led to being able to review if a goal should be allowed because "play should have continued". In today's NHL, that call would have been overturned and ruled a goal.
Slapshot: the 'non call' at #5 happened in Game 6 of the 1993 Western Conference Finals. NOT Game 7. Game 7 was is Toronto at Maple Leaf Gardens and Wayne had 3 goals (a hat trick) and 1 assist for 4 points in Game 7. Wayne has said that was the best game he's ever played in the NHL. Your moment at #2... Game 6 was in CALGARY; NOT Tampa Bay.
Also, Gelinas DEFINITELY scored in game 6... strangely, the refs also missed a DEFINITE trip by Marty St. Louis against Iginla which was immediately followed by the game winning goal by Tampa.
I don’t even hate the penguins for that horrible win against Nashville during the cup. The ref just said no for no reason. It was so heartbreaking to see that that call changed the entire game and made us lose. That is a reason why Nashville hates refs and every time they make a call we shout “ref you suck”.
How many times does the Brett Hull goal need to be explained? At the time, players with possession could be in the crease, and you didn't lose possession by getting your own rebound.
How is number 4 bad call? An early whistle yes, but not a bad call. The play was dead and puck was put in the net after the whistle. Do you mean that the right call would have been a good goal?
Actually when looking through all of them, many of them were the right call. For example, Hull goal, Gelinas no goal. The Gelinas goal was inconclusive, and the call on ice was no goal. It went by the rulebook. The Gretzky Gilmour high stick was a missed call as Fraser did not see it and Gilmour said Fraser it was a follow through even though it was not. Fraser had to go with the information he had and not call a penalty. There have been many many worse calls than these.
I mean the Calgary Flames still could’ve lost the Stanley Cup, because if they’d scored even two times from seven minutes left, because I’ve seen players score three times within one minute, in fact I seen a team score five times within 15 seconds!
When it’s almost under 2-1 minutes left in the 3rd period or anywhere in overtime, sometimes you’ll get away with penalties and goals that should or should not count, sometimes you don’t. Daniel Sedin didn’t with a penalty, Alex burrows didn’t with a penalty but Wayne Gretzky did with a penalty
The problem with the flames no goal is the simple fact angles suck. Parallax error exists. The only view we have of that play, is heavily skewed by parallax. Its hard to say 100% conclusively that it was in. And it has to be 100%.
Regarding the Gretzky high stick, he has a white shirt when injuring Gilmour, but when they show a clip of him scoring the game-winning goal, he has a black shirt.
Educate yourself about the last play. Before the playoffs, the crease rule was updated. That was actually a good goal. Had the rule not changed before the playoffs, it would have been waived off
Lol at the Greztky one. They all switched jersey after the missed call? The missed call was game 6, and he scored a hat trick to force game 7. And in that day a high stick causing a cut was automatically 5 and a game, not just a penalty.
I'm sorry, but 1:35 is Prices fault. Look closely. I know he was making a save, but his pad moved to Hayes direction and hit his skate. Hayes didn't directly skate into his pad.. You're on ice, obviously you're going to slide with that bump, especially when the skate hits the area of the pads that Price moved his pad to...
The worst one gotta be Game 5 of Oilers vs Cannucks this year. Where Patterson (From Cannucks) got a call for Charging when the other dude charged him, Patterson was just standing there passing to a teammate. Oilers was even very confused and even Oilers fans were throwing stuff at the ref.
Before you rant, you should at least learn the player's names. Who is Patterson? To the best of my recollection, nobody by that name has ever played in the NHL.
#8 is a legal goal, Price's pad got stuck on the skate and the momentum brought him out. #6 is a boarding call, no intent to play the puck and it was late head first into the boards. #5, should've been a high stick yes, however the 3 official system is not fool proof and things will be missed, thats why they adopted 4. #4 is not a bad call, its an unfortunate mistake that happens.
@ryans413 Like I have said on previous comments in other videos regarding that incident blame Nurse he caused it to happen by pushing Kessler into Talbot
@ryans413 Talbot did reset after the Perry bump then Nurse pushed Kessler into Talbot causing goal to happen. Same game Oilers got away with a full high stick which led to a 4 on 1 rush and a goal. So calls were even that game.
The one where they “drag” Price out of the net i can see going either way, it has to be avoidable contact. Price forcing his pad out to make the save and into the path of the skater who then gets his skate stuck in the pad could be argued as unavoidable in the time he had. But i wouldnt be mad if they called it either
4:42 Leafs fans if you don’t like this call you have to be cheering for Vancouver. Same thing McDavid did but the league has to “protect the investment”
At 0:22 - It looks to me like the ref was in the process of calling the double minors, in which case the whistle is blown. Neither team had to touch the puck to blow the play dead, therefore the goal couldn't have counted. My 2 cents. On the next one, with Nash running into Price, yes it looks like interference, but Price's right leg and pad may have been outside the crease when Nash hit him. The two different angles seem to show conflicting facts, which of course is not possible. 1:31 favors Price, while 1:36 favors Nash. I think this was a difficult - not an obvious - call. Certainly not a "worst call." I couldn't watch this erroneous video anymore after the claim of a "soft ass" penalty at 3:17. I think you're way off the mark, and the title "WORST Calls in NHL History" is clickbait.
I've take a good look at the the 2nd call, there wasn't geed enough evidence, from an angle it might apear to be across when I is not. Number 1 was the correct call, according to the then rules.
Number 4 was a bit of a stretch to say that they would have won the Stanley cup if it wasn’t for that call cuz if they won that game there still was a game 7 witch would have been back in Pittsburg
There should be ZERO excuse in the MLB. Slow sport, tons of cameras and angles. I'd say that the NHL is the hardest, and especially in the playoffs where shifts are 25-35 seconds and all four lines are rolling in and off the ice. The sport in insanely fast, and the refs have to be in perfect position at all times to make the right call. I have no opinion on the NBA or NFL really, but the pervasive and shoved-down-your-throat betting sites I think is contributing to people questioning refs more....FFS the 2024 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs are SPONSORED by f'n Draft Kings/ Not a good look in my opinion.
There was the 2016/17 playoff series with the Oilers and Ducks where the winning goal was such obvious goalie interference and it was reviewed and still not called. Ducks player laying in the crease holding the goalie's pad open for the shot.
Oilers fans still not over it lol. First fact wrong it was the tying goal. Second fact it was right call because Nurse initiated that whole thing by pushing Kessler into Talbot creating the contact. They go by what initiated it not what followed after.
What about the hit on Richard with no penalty on the Boston player, then Richard retaliates and gets suspended for a year! You did say history of hockey! This was the worst!
the Chicago coincidental minor is an obvious call, D Sedin was clearly interference, the Nashville whistle was a classic lost puck (not a bad call), the 04 "puck was in" call wasn't strong enough to overturn the call on the ice. (and I'm a die hard flames fan)
I’m blind. I’m deaf. I wanna be a ref.
IM BLIND! IM DEAF! I WANNA BE A REF!
Lez go! I’M BLIND! I’M DEAF! I WANNA BE A REF!!!
You’d probably be better than the Florida refs.
Why did you copy my comment
And you should not have comment
I don’t care what sport is your favorite hockey, football, baseball, or basketball. The refs really need to be fined or suspended for making such horrible calls.
Would never happen. It's all rigged
That’s a great idea I wish it could be a thing
SO RIGGED!! I just wanna know who's writing the script?!
True that
X
These refs be staring at the solar eclipse
without the special glasses
Facts😂
😂
That “fuck up” caught me so off guard
fr 😭😭
shut
up
Same
Same
Ong💀
7:33 "Listen Craig, these nice fans are wishing the referees good luck"
Great video!!! Sickening subject matter. I'm a Buffalonian. The "No Goal" I still can't rewatch. Also, I don't remember the year. It was playoffs. Ottawa at Buffalo. Senator right winger comes up the right side CLEAR AS DAY OFFSIDE. Dominek Hasek in net relaxed his stance waiting for the whistle that never sounded. Winger continued in...shot, scored. Hasek (and team) dejected. Hasek never regained composure....as if he was saying "What a bunch of B.S. ...to hell with this". Sabres looked dejected from there on our and lost the series. Someone should police the refs!!!
Shanghai Sharks?? Daniel Setting?? 🙃
Exactly... If you want to be taken seriously, at least get the team right San Jose California is nowhere close to Shanghai
Gotta be some AI-generated thing leveraging a voice. I am pretty sure that's possible. I've seen it on crime and cop videos that are posted on here a lot. Obvious mispronunciation in them. Either that, or this guy doesn't watch Hockey, which can't be, right? This IS a channel called Slapshot after all.
It’s a f***ing joke r u guys that gullible
In Holland, football referees are required to meet the press afterwards to discuss the calls they made during the match. In rugby union, in referees are miked up and in real time you can hear the discussions with the booth and the players.
For the Gretzky-Gilmour no-call. Rules at the time assessed an automatic ejection for a high-stick that drew blood. Gretzky wouldn’t have been in the box, he would have been out of the game.
Keep in mind though the referee kerry Fraser didn’t actually see it….so he went to his linesmen for help….i think on e them saw it…problem was did they eat this one……Fraser did the right thing by asking for help….which linesman protected Gretzky is the next question…
@@danielsworld8832Didn't see it while looking right at the play
@@jeffreycairns767 kerry was obstructed…..by another player…..Linesmen could’ve made the assist in helping with the call
@@danielsworld8832 No he wasn't. There's no way he didn't see that play. The puck was no where near Gretzky/Gilmour when the stick went up and Gilmour went down. There's not 1 ref/linesman that should have missed that. But, there was no way anybody was Kicking Gretzky out of the game, even in Toronto
and it was not game 7.
I blame most of the bad calls on Gary Bettman's influence. The day that guy retires, I'm taking a week off to celebrate.
11:35 bro really waited that long to drop the bomb
I was at game 6 in Nashville. This video just brought back all of the emotions I went through during that game
I swear dude.I can’t even comprehend how bad those refs were
As a penguins fan I understand your frustration
worst part about the gretzky high stick is that it robbed us of a habs leafs final
Yes, and the Leafs would have won vs the Habs. LA didn't belong in the finals at all. It was a script from Bettman, just like he did with their new kid at Vegas. That guy needs to go, FAST.
On the Brett Hull goal, the NHL justified it by saying that the puck entered the crease first, then Hull entered the crease and took a shot. The goalie made the initial save and the puck left the crease after the rebound, Hull got the puck back on his own rebound and shot it in the net. They said that getting your own rebound is not a loss of possession so Hull was fine still being in the crease even though the puck left the crease during the play. I am not saying I agree with that, but that was the justification they used. Is getting your own rebound a loss of possession... I don't know if the definition of losing possession goes into that kind of detail or not. It sounds like grasping at straws, but I honestly don't know.
Anyway, the whole crease rule at that time was stupid anyway. I am glad that this incident made them change it back. There were so many goals called back that season because the tip of a skate was in the crease that didn't affect the play in an era where fans were begging for more goals.
This is correct. You were allowed to be in the crease with possession, so without Buffalo gaining possession, Hull technically never lost it. It was just a bad case of the spirit of the rule not matching the letter of the rule.
I'm honestly just tired of it being called controversial. He's barely in the crease while pivoting on his edges. Makes no contact with Hasek, and recovering a rebound. Think it's just butthurt Buffalo fans tbh.
I had also seen interviews with Brett Hull saying they had changed this rule some months earlier.
Yeah this video has some stupid calls on the list and this is the worst one
Dude u know as well as I and every hockey fan that when it comes to bettmen if u don't listen to want he wants called and not called refs will lose there jobs that s.o.b. has his hand in every decision and call made he's an absolute Is bias judgmental Hypocritical Anti canadian prick oh and absolute Power controlling freak the day he finally calls it Quits I will celebrate and party for a bloody month singing " high ho the wicked ass hole is YYYEEEAAAHHH BBBAAABBBYYY 🎉!!
Number 8 isn't goalie interference Pricee just slid over in to him and his leg caught on Prices pad.
Exactly, outside the crease
Exactly. Find another bad call to make your top 10 list. And apologize to the ref about the parlay bet comment
So if a goalie is an inch outside the crease and gets dragged completely into the corner, that should be a good goal? Makes sense......
@XxNoMErcY99xX 1. That has never happened in the history of the league. 2. Even if it did, it would be a penalty. It's no different then a goalie coming out to play the puck. It's 1 thing to tap a goalie while outside the crease but something completely different to hit, or drag, a goalie. If they called a goal off for a goalie being touched outside the crease, goalies would constantly be outside the crease making sure to get tapped by somebody.
@@XxNoMErcY99xX he got dragged cause he forced it to happen skater skating towards the boards and leg got caught in between pads when he was skating that way making the move then price stick his pads up while he was trying to get out he was dragged cause of momentum of where he was skating how is that interference you goalies try to get every damn weak call in the book
As a Calgary albertan I can’t tell you how mad that non-goal call makes me I’ve literally been thinking about it since it happened 19 years ago, watched it live with my dad and we were screaming
As a Leafs fan, I get it. Unfortunately, Bettman has rigged it in favor of American teams. It's all about money
You're wrong. It's at a parallax angle. You can't trust it. ruclips.net/video/7SqCYSpEK-8/видео.html&ab_channel=HybridIcing
We could hear the whole neighborhood. People were locked in and it was a hell of a time to be a flamer. Still repping 🔥🔥🔥
correction, the high stick in LA vs Toronto was game 6. toronto just got beaten in game 7 and complains about it as though the high stick was in game 7.
the flames one, given the camera angle, and the puck not being on the ice? i'm not actually convinced it went in. it would need to be clear from a directly top down view. which doesn't show it clearly fully over the line. therefore, no goal. the angle being used to show it as a goal i believe suffers from what is called the "parallax effect", which is a distortion in perception between what you see and actual positions
Toronto didn't get "crushed", it was a 1 goal game
@@jeffreycairns767 fair enough. I didn't watch it. I wasn't even alive yet. I was going off a video from UrinatingTree that stated "Gretzky dominated them on their home ice." Which I took to mean that Toronto had imploded in a game 7, as they are want to do
@edschramm6757 OH OK. He was a big factor in the game 7 win but, like I said, 1 goal game.
ESPN would show that the puck did not completely cross the line, therefore it was the correct call.
🤓👆
11:30 lmao 🤣 didn’t expect “the fuck up” to come out 😂
Never could stand Kerry Fraser, has to be the most arrogant ref in history
It’s pretty ironic how the number 1 WORST call on this video is the only one that was legal. I love to see that Sabres fans are still crying about it though
It's legal now, but at the time it wasn't
It was legal at the time. Hence it being called a good goal. The puck entered the crease first and Hull never lost possession.
@@matthewcheevers4861while it was legal, it wasn't public information not was it informed to the teams prior to the incident. This prompted them to say they changed the rule without telling anyone. Terrible decision by the higher ups, the controversy will go on forever because if they really changed the rules and the goal was legal, they should have stated that before the game/series/playoffs in general
Bro called the San Jose Sharks the Shanghai Sharks
I was born & raised in Edmonton so this is hard to say. *Gretzky clearly cut Gilmour, end of story* What's possibly worse is that if the Leafs had won the series we would have had a *Toronto / Montreal Stanley Cup final*
The Preds vs Penguins call isn’t necessarily BAD, it’s just annoying. From the refs perspective it looked like he had covered the puck, and so he blew the whistle to stop the play.
And nowadays it happens quite often that refs blow the play dead bcz they lose sight of
What I don't get is sometimes it's a quick whistle while other times it seems to take forever. Even with the same refs
@@jeffreycairns767depends on what you see and how the goalie reacts. Murray definitely locked up trying not to move thinking the puck was in his gear. The ref sees that and quick whistle. Other times when the goalie is still looking around or moving it will be a delayed whistle until the ref decides it is covered
@davidwaxter66 I get that but you have to admit, there have been many, many times that a whistle barely touches a goalie and the whistle blows while other times, it's clear the puck is smothered yet still takes 5+ seconds to blow it dead. The average whistle I agree with you but I'm not talking the average whistle.
3:31\\ was a hit from behind. Clear back of shoulder and arm/ Good call.
exactly also boarding
2024 game 6 second round, McDavid (aka McSlashy), Captian of the Oilers cut the face of Canusks Captian Hughes . No call double two minute right in front the ref. To rub it in they made Hughes leave the ice for bleeding.
It's the oilers they always get the calls their way. Have to protect McDavid
There was a call in game 5 between Canucks and Oilers that should make your next list. Pettersson of the Canucks clears the puck out of his end and an Oiler skates into the back of him and falls, Pettersson get called for charging and he was standing still. Nice to see your referees were the usual suspects. Better put Kelly Sutherland into that mix of referees.
He clearly jumped so yeah it’s charging good call
@@philippevincens2778? Petterson was a literal statue.
@@theultra5482 A statue that hops to get the center of gravity of something is about to demolish it, maybe. Your feet cannot leave the ice in any manner when contact is being made. It is a cheap shot, a dangerous play, and clearly a an aspect of charging that needs to be removed from the game, hence why it is called a penalty practically every time it happens these days. The real truth was Petterson has zero physical presence. Instead of standing his ground and doing a reverse check or taking the body to make a play he jumped using the player's own momentum against him. IMO that type of play is equivalent to ducking a check near the boards. Its weak af. Petterson should be embarrassed by the performance he put up this post season. That was a great call , charging all day
@@dannyjackson5356 like be honest I think it was a bit of a weak call but by definition it is a penalty. Lots of worse ones are let go in the playoffs though.
That was a fair call you can’t jump and hit someone
I don’t think I’ve ever heard this guy swear in a video. I gotta say.. I like it!
Surprised this video wasn’t all the 2024 playoffs officiating
If I recall, that Nashville call is what led to being able to review if a goal should be allowed because "play should have continued". In today's NHL, that call would have been overturned and ruled a goal.
If the ref doesnt see the penalty, they cant lie and call it later.
Calling them the Shanghai sharks is an act of war
Man I love the shanghei sharks
2004 still haunts me..... Flames were the cup winners
Slapshot: the 'non call' at #5 happened in Game 6 of the 1993 Western Conference Finals. NOT Game 7. Game 7 was is Toronto at Maple Leaf Gardens and Wayne had 3 goals (a hat trick) and 1 assist for 4 points in Game 7. Wayne has said that was the best game he's ever played in the NHL.
Your moment at #2...
Game 6 was in CALGARY; NOT Tampa Bay.
Two words for the last clip. "No goal!" - Lindy Ruff
Also, Gelinas DEFINITELY scored in game 6... strangely, the refs also missed a DEFINITE trip by Marty St. Louis against Iginla which was immediately followed by the game winning goal by Tampa.
I don’t even hate the penguins for that horrible win against Nashville during the cup. The ref just said no for no reason. It was so heartbreaking to see that that call changed the entire game and made us lose. That is a reason why Nashville hates refs and every time they make a call we shout “ref you suck”.
How many times does the Brett Hull goal need to be explained? At the time, players with possession could be in the crease, and you didn't lose possession by getting your own rebound.
9:11 that should have been “Tripping penalty”.
As a Stars fan, I can recognize the bad call but at the same time I love hearing Sabres complain years later
"Seddy-in". Good ol Canucks legend... Daniel "Seddy-in".
Anyone with a basic understating of angles knows that the flames did not in fact score
He's definitely a oilers fan
How is number 4 bad call? An early whistle yes, but not a bad call. The play was dead and puck was put in the net after the whistle. Do you mean that the right call would have been a good goal?
Actually when looking through all of them, many of them were the right call. For example, Hull goal, Gelinas no goal. The Gelinas goal was inconclusive, and the call on ice was no goal. It went by the rulebook.
The Gretzky Gilmour high stick was a missed call as Fraser did not see it and Gilmour said Fraser it was a follow through even though it was not. Fraser had to go with the information he had and not call a penalty.
There have been many many worse calls than these.
The Gretzky one is very hard to buy as Fraser was looking right at them when it happened. There was no way he was kicking Gretzky out of that game
I mean the Calgary Flames still could’ve lost the Stanley Cup, because if they’d scored even two times from seven minutes left, because I’ve seen players score three times within one minute, in fact I seen a team score five times within 15 seconds!
The non call on Gretzky was in game 6. The Leafs still had a chance to win in game 7.
Although true, there never should of been a game 7
Shiet, they about to give McD the Gretzky treatment tomorrow. 😢
oh god I hope not.... but I can see it
When it’s almost under 2-1 minutes left in the 3rd period or anywhere in overtime, sometimes you’ll get away with penalties and goals that should or should not count, sometimes you don’t. Daniel Sedin didn’t with a penalty, Alex burrows didn’t with a penalty but Wayne Gretzky did with a penalty
3:43 it’s literally boarding. Good call.
At number 8 there was no goaltender interference, because it was out of the blue box and so it's the dept of the goalie
We need to bring back ref jersey names. And, we need to normalize water boarding bad refs.
The problem with the flames no goal is the simple fact angles suck. Parallax error exists. The only view we have of that play, is heavily skewed by parallax. Its hard to say 100% conclusively that it was in. And it has to be 100%.
I’m a cgy fan and I’ve always wondered about the call in 2004, but this vid was the first time I saw that angle and yea 100% in 😭😭😭😭😭
Regarding the Gretzky high stick, he has a white shirt when injuring Gilmour, but when they show a clip of him scoring the game-winning goal, he has a black shirt.
The call was when the Kings were in their home jerseys (the white ones). The "goal" was a completely different game. Horrible editing on the video
judging by the thumbnail zach hyman has gotten a job reffing against connor mcdavid
The “no goal game” has lived on with us forever. The call was botched, and the rule was later changed after the controversy.
Educate yourself about the last play. Before the playoffs, the crease rule was updated. That was actually a good goal. Had the rule not changed before the playoffs, it would have been waived off
The refs are TOTALLY doing there job
Yes they are. They're doing exactly what Bettman has told them to do
Lol at the Greztky one. They all switched jersey after the missed call?
The missed call was game 6, and he scored a hat trick to force game 7. And in that day a high stick causing a cut was automatically 5 and a game, not just a penalty.
I'm sorry, but 1:35 is Prices fault. Look closely. I know he was making a save, but his pad moved to Hayes direction and hit his skate. Hayes didn't directly skate into his pad.. You're on ice, obviously you're going to slide with that bump, especially when the skate hits the area of the pads that Price moved his pad to...
Honestly, it's no one's fault, shit happens. It's hockey, it's a rough sport, it happens lol.
The worst one gotta be Game 5 of Oilers vs Cannucks this year.
Where Patterson (From Cannucks) got a call for Charging when the other dude charged him, Patterson was just standing there passing to a teammate.
Oilers was even very confused and even Oilers fans were throwing stuff at the ref.
Before you rant, you should at least learn the player's names. Who is Patterson? To the best of my recollection, nobody by that name has ever played in the NHL.
#8 is a legal goal, Price's pad got stuck on the skate and the momentum brought him out. #6 is a boarding call, no intent to play the puck and it was late head first into the boards. #5, should've been a high stick yes, however the 3 official system is not fool proof and things will be missed, thats why they adopted 4. #4 is not a bad call, its an unfortunate mistake that happens.
Price wrapped himself up with another player. No goaltender interference. Good call refs!
As a Carey Price fan I hope New York Rangers never wins a Stanley Cup till the end of time
Where is the Vegas vs San Jose one in 2019? Not a fan of either team but Easily should be on that list. One of the worst calls ever!
2017 Oilers Ducks I guess you can be on top of the goalie and the goal still counts
@ryans413 Like I have said on previous comments in other videos regarding that incident blame Nurse he caused it to happen by pushing Kessler into Talbot
@@disneyjohn8536 but Perry also held Talbots pad down so yea debate me all you want it was a bad missed call.
No it wasnt🤣🤣
@ryans413 Talbot did reset after the Perry bump then Nurse pushed Kessler into Talbot causing goal to happen. Same game Oilers got away with a full high stick which led to a 4 on 1 rush and a goal. So calls were even that game.
The one where they “drag” Price out of the net i can see going either way, it has to be avoidable contact. Price forcing his pad out to make the save and into the path of the skater who then gets his skate stuck in the pad could be argued as unavoidable in the time he had. But i wouldnt be mad if they called it either
ref didn’t rob the cup from calgary they had a whole game 7 to win.
Gilmore got clipped in the sixth game. The game went on to a seventh game.
11:46 bro the longest game was in 2023 in 4th over time between the hurricanes and panthers
1. At the time it was the longest.
2. In the finals history not just playoffs
@@davidwaxter66 oh
You forgot one big one that trumps at least 6 of these..the infamous offside call with the flyers vs islanders 1980..smh 🤦🏻♂️
4:42 Leafs fans if you don’t like this call you have to be cheering for Vancouver. Same thing McDavid did but the league has to “protect the investment”
I am cheering on Vancouver
@@jeffreycairns767bro they are already playing the oilers the oilers are going to win Stanley cup
@@Unknown220-l7x 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@jeffreycairns767 watca laughing for💀
@@Unknown220-l7x Oilers aren't winning anything worth mentioning
As an islanders fan can we please resign the refs?😂😂😂
Still disgusted by that horse shit call in 2017. That game was robbery
Vegas/San Jose playoffs major panality on faceoff 🤬🤬🤬
Game managers. They have these in Dungeons and Dragons and Helldivers 2.
I think that even if the penalty isn't pertinent to the goal, it should still cause a pause in the gameplay, as long as it happened beforehand.
At 0:22 - It looks to me like the ref was in the process of calling the double minors, in which case the whistle is blown. Neither team had to touch the puck to blow the play dead, therefore the goal couldn't have counted. My 2 cents. On the next one, with Nash running into Price, yes it looks like interference, but Price's right leg and pad may have been outside the crease when Nash hit him. The two different angles seem to show conflicting facts, which of course is not possible. 1:31 favors Price, while 1:36 favors Nash. I think this was a difficult - not an obvious - call. Certainly not a "worst call." I couldn't watch this erroneous video anymore after the claim of a "soft ass" penalty at 3:17. I think you're way off the mark, and the title "WORST Calls in NHL History" is clickbait.
The Gretzky Gilmour incident was game 6, just to clear it up.
i think true hockey fans knew the '99 and '04 finals would be in this video
I've take a good look at the the 2nd call, there wasn't geed enough evidence, from an angle it might apear to be across when I is not. Number 1 was the correct call, according to the then rules.
Number 4 was a bit of a stretch to say that they would have won the Stanley cup if it wasn’t for that call cuz if they won that game there still was a game 7 witch would have been back in Pittsburg
so you can diss the isles but you cant talk about the 7 guys on the godamn ice for the lightning.
Shanghai Sharks?????
Yeah it’s San Jose Sharks, he made a mistake
@@scalezzzz how do mistake an NHL team for a chinese basketball team
@scalezzzz he's mispronouncing player names too (Daniel sedin) bro doesn't know hockey
I am now subscribed because of the popup
5:56 💀
7:31 “Ref you suck! Ref you suck! Ref you suck! Ref you suck! Ref you suck! Ref you suck!”
it’s always with Nashville I swear they hate us. You guys remember that one where they said that they did it for fun?
Man the NHL needs to tighten the fuck up LuL
I think the NHL has the worst reffing out of any major league sport
I say MLB with their bad strikes and ball calls
There should be ZERO excuse in the MLB. Slow sport, tons of cameras and angles. I'd say that the NHL is the hardest, and especially in the playoffs where shifts are 25-35 seconds and all four lines are rolling in and off the ice. The sport in insanely fast, and the refs have to be in perfect position at all times to make the right call. I have no opinion on the NBA or NFL really, but the pervasive and shoved-down-your-throat betting sites I think is contributing to people questioning refs more....FFS the 2024 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs are SPONSORED by f'n Draft Kings/ Not a good look in my opinion.
3:20, if they gave a minor for boarding it is fine in a regular season game. In a game like this, and the series 3:0 it is debatable
the maple leafs happened in game 6 not game 7. Toronto was leading 3-2
Educate yourself about #5. That missed call happened in game 6. The Kings went on to out the Leafs convincingly back in Toronto to win the series.
There was the 2016/17 playoff series with the Oilers and Ducks where the winning goal was such obvious goalie interference and it was reviewed and still not called. Ducks player laying in the crease holding the goalie's pad open for the shot.
Oilers fans still not over it lol. First fact wrong it was the tying goal. Second fact it was right call because Nurse initiated that whole thing by pushing Kessler into Talbot creating the contact. They go by what initiated it not what followed after.
Hey, game 6 of the 1999 Stanley Cup final was long, so it had to end at some point. Either that or I’m just being biased of being a Stars fan😅
well, you can say these refs suck, but over half of these were good calls..
this is why the flyers fans always boo the refs
"Shanghai sharks"? They're the San Jose sharks, dinkus
How is McGoo’s phantom hand pass on Edmonton not on this list? Lol
4:00 "subscribe if you hate me" 💀💀💀
I love Gary bettman (I’m not gay tho)
11:25
What about the hit on Richard with no penalty on the Boston player, then Richard retaliates and gets suspended for a year! You did say history of hockey! This was the worst!
Does he know how to pronounce Sedin
the Chicago coincidental minor is an obvious call, D Sedin was clearly interference, the Nashville whistle was a classic lost puck (not a bad call), the 04 "puck was in" call wasn't strong enough to overturn the call on the ice. (and I'm a die hard flames fan)