Prof. Sir Roger Penrose - Hawking Points in Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, Quantum Spacetime
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 июн 2024
- Prof. Sir Roger Penrose - Are we seeing Hawking points in cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB)?
Quantum Spacetime 2019 conference public lecture speech. Hawking radiation, black hole, cosmological constant, big bang theory, inflation, gravitating bodies, planck constant, energy conservation, second law of thermodynamics, cosmos, physics, space science and much more.
------------------
/ matfyzjein
/ matfyzjein
www.fmph.uniba.sk/
Faculty of Mathematics, Physics, and Informatics
Comenius University, Bratislava
..
#veda #matematika #matfyz #prednaska #comeniusuniversity #university #math #science
12:27 start of talk.
0ooTheMAXXoo0 thank you
Massive verticals, sir
I’ll never understand why people speak before the speaker.
Penrose has a compelling theory - in the very distant future all matter would have evaporated from black holes and the universe will consist of photons which have no mass. If there is no mass in the universe, size and time become meaningless. The universe becomes a singularity to start the next eon. This is difficult to get your mind around, but makes more sense than Inflation. For the first time I have found a reasonable explanation of what came before the big bang. Well done Roger. Nicely summarised starting 1:27:48
At the end there will be photons, m=0 and time stops. How these photon fields get together may have a better explanation in the big bounce, (Ashteker, Rovelli, Lee Smolin-QLG).
Thank you for that time stamp ... Awesome!! 🙂
If Universe happened once it can and does happen again. I have wondered about what Roger is talking about many years before it became a topic and I imagined floating around seeing no mass but not being part of it but wondered if no mass then big doesn't "know" its big it can be big and small, its equivalent. It has a name called Conformal Cyclic Cosmology...now I know...so my hunch was right...
Without getting to ahead of ourselves in the distant future, the Eternal Now w/mass and gravity highlights a beautiful scale invariant which continues the black hole singularity from the big bang to the Maximus Universe.
Meh. I came up with the exact same idea several years ago. I was considering what happens to the strong interaction as the dark energy ramps rather than what happens to the photons and black holes. I expect interesting effects as electromagnetism and strong interactions crossover as modified by DE. The black holes are boring. They just evaporate. The forces are interesting.
Look at that packed house!!! The Man is an absolute Legend, what an opportunity to sit in here!!! Thank You FMFI UK!!!
I've been watching him present this theory over and over. I'm starting to think that this could be the best explanation we've ever had. I bet someday he will be looked back on as a genius for this.
This. Definitely.
✊✊
I would argue that he's wrong about the BH information thing. I would put the apparent reduction in entropy at the moment when spacetime becomes conformally squashed, ie at the big bang, not when a BH evaporates...maybe not even then, but then we're getting into theology, with the information content of the universe expanding without limit forever, into some kind of meta-Omega point???... Other than that, the fact is that observation supports his theory, what with the gravitaional wave rings and Hawking points seen in the CMB
I love his old school diagrams !
Professor Penrose using an overhead projector. Absolutely classic (in a good way).
there's a whole lot of entropy on that desk 😂😂
Thank you Professor Penrose.
His hypothesis can be viewed as an oscillating theory, hence potentially frequency driven given that mass is removed. Which when extrapolated, would remove a barrier between Relativity and quantum (not all, just one, that of size/distance). The man is brilliant.
Remarkable stamina for a 90+ old Penrose.
This is the first time that I've heard Professor Penrose mention the steady state theory. But is that the nail in the coffin for the big bang? Staying tuned in.
If you look at Rogers videos online, most of them have a horrible sound :( such an important man, can't get a proper mic and sound :(
...and yet actors can...
In Coperenicus Center sound and images were good. Check it out if you look for a better quality
Such greate person as Roger and the camara person not focus what Royer points to in the figure, was this person sleeping or what?
maybe he hates wearing lapel mics as much as he hates presenting via a computer 😁
Thanks for the heads up. Light and time are hard to get back once lost.
What a beautiful mind.
Many thanks to all concerned, and for posting. One of the most important things I get out of a lot of these sessions, is in the Q&A, where sometimes my own uncertainties are cleared up, but more often I hear things I wouldn't have thought of. I learn a lot from those questions - and their answers.
YES!!!
I guess Slovakia separated from sound Czech as well.
Hahaha good one!
Me habría sentido muy honrado si hubiese podido digitalizar al Prof. Roger Penrose todas esas láminas-transparencias y pasarlo todo a un simple fichero "PowerPoint" (o similar), y a continuación, haberle facilitado un par de micrófonos en miniatura, inalámbricos, de estos que nos colocamos en la solapa de la chaqueta, uno a cada lado (para recoger el sonido en estéreo, vaya). Un simple mando, más pequeño que un bolígrafo, conectado por Bluetooth a un PC portátil que ejecutase la aplicación que contuviese toda la presentación y dirigiese dicha aplicación en remoto, habría permitido al Profesor olvidarse de micrófonos, cables, hojas y láminas, le habríamos podido escuchar perfectamente, habríamos podido ver bien los gráficos y él sólo habría tenido que preocuparse de darle a un botoncito del pequeño mando a distancia, atrás y adelante, mientras dictaba esa extraordinaria clase.
Muchas gracias, en cualquier caso, a la Universidad de Bratislava por el evento y por publicarlo en Internet.
It Would Be An Honor To See A Complete Legacy Of Concerted And Logically Sequential Lectures By Sir Roger Penrose, From His Present Perspectives, A Detailed Delineation Of The Universal Discussion, The Foundational And Fundamental Principles Of Each Subject That He Himself Would Consider Essential Wisdoms For The Next Generation To Meaningfully Participate In The Continuance Of Discovery.
FMFI UK
Thanks for posting this video.
Love Roger Penrose he reminds me of Doc from Back to the Future
Sir Roger 👏👏👏
These universities must start hiring professional audio/video engineers if they want to communicate to a wider audience.
If "wider audiences" switch off because RP is not wearing a lapel mic, then I worry about society's future. I take your point that it was not super Hi-Fi, but it was perfectly understandable and the content was fascinating.
Sir Roger Penrose is to astrophysics what Mick Jagger is to rock ‘n’ roll. They are both Rockstars emphasis on the word*:-)
"Upside-down Wedding Cake" model with each aeon being much, much bigger than the previous one, but size has no meaning as you cross the boundaries.
Wonderful lecture
Question from the audience - why did the introducers have much better sound than the main speaker? Every word mattered and the subtitles failed when the sound failed.
10 minutes they had those speakers up there, rambling on and on…
I do. He really is. 5:25. Barry Kripke
from TBBT gives the introduction to
Sir Penrose's lecture.
I hope he lives to see his thoughts on consciousness as an emergent property of complexity in computing born out..... the tiles are groovy and all that, great stuff... but we are now well beyond the Turing test - yet no further on in any real understanding of 'understanding'... ahead of his time... big fan...
I agree with you, he's a fantastic mind.
Be afraid of that electronic consciousness: it never had the opportunity to evolve basic sociality, what took us millennia probably, the most normal thing for such advanced general AI without social evolution but with "superpowers" (at calculating, focusing, etc.) is that it will be a monster and almost certainly destroy Humankind.
@@LuisAldamiz How do I stop it? and save maiwaifuh?
I hate them ETA up birds?
@@infinitinifni7057 - ??
Music to our ears.
He speaks so confidently on issues I think I can grasp, but probably do not! I love Physics.
I think this is because the nature of reality isn’t intuitive, yet there are ways to explain something counter-intuitive in an intuitive way. Like how higher dimensions can be projected down to lower dimensions - a hyper cube being shown in 3 dimensions is a good example of this, also hyperbolic spheres.
@@checkeredcheese Yep, most concepts can be boiled down to a level where they can be understood with much more ease. There's nothing like having something rather esoteric explained to you by analogy and it all falling into place in your head as you listen 👍
I think most are a work in progress. It takes a firm belief in the math you love to stand your grounds. It takes an unquestionable faith.
Information conservation must be abandoned?, GR is essentially correct? I like the way you think, Professor.
Gluing Noncommutative Twistor Spaces
Matilde Marcolli, Roger Penrose
We describe a general procedure, based on Gerstenhaber-Schack complexes, for extending to quantized twistor spaces the Donaldson-Friedman gluing of twistor spaces via deformation theory of singular spaces. We consider in particular various possible quantizations of twistor spaces that leave the underlying spacetime manifold classical, including the geometric quantization of twistor spaces originally constructed by the second author, as well as some variants based on noncommutative geometry. We discuss specific aspects of the gluing construction for these different quantization procedures.
OH so Penrose calls the noncommutative version now "Palatial" Twistor theory. So he has more recent talks on Palatial twistor theory.
@@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 Thankyou
Thank you
I wonder if he is juggling his slides on purpose to make his audience go crazy. Could be his kind of humor. Fantastic person.
Do 'Black Wholes' Generally Retain The Information They Interpret?
What Type Of Internal Structure Is Most Likely Given The Constraints?
Well done for guest. I am finally thinking to apply Slovak University
We are glad to hear that :) Looking forward to your application
@@MatFyzjeIn To uvidíme či to bude možné časovo zakriť
Do it! :o
I feel he is correct about the microwave background radiation needs more in-depth study, like are it really about temperature alone or do it have a structural importance. I kind of like this idea that Hawking points is actually black holes that forms early primeval black holes to kickstart formation of galaxies and stars and then star continues this process to help making even more stars and heavier elements I don’t agree on, that black holes is only devouring monsters only. I believe black holes are kind of engines that makes our universe look like it is today and kind of switches of the light, when its time for new Aeon to do its big bang thing. Anyway our universe seams young and not ancient at all. So not the first one to exist nor the last one. Please comment, what are you views on this subject’s.
#AwarenessConsciousness
Glory to Sir Roger Penrose.
Penrose at 12:40
Well, yes. But the courtesies are part of the session and should not be edited out.
This hypothesis is solid. Solves a lot of problems. A googol years in the absence of clocks is instantaneous. In fact a googol years without a conscious observer to appreciate the passage of time is irrelevant. How long was the period before you were born? To you, the Universal observer, this period has no meaning. Subsequently, after your consciousness expires, time will cease to have meaning to you. This is the basic concept behind this hypothesis. However this hypothesis includes all observers, i.e. all particles of mass.
Yes I was thinking the same thing. The amount of time it takes is irrelevant a googol years a googolplex doesn't matter.
The universe is clearly ‘sock shaped’ it turns itself (and time) inside out between each Eon. Nature is simple and beautiful… not clumsy cones like this.
The Big Bang and the artificial intelligence explosion are the same event happening on each side of each universe/simulation
In Theory, Are The Qualitative Properties Of Dark Matter More Like Viscous Potential Or Static Gravity?
this is probably a dumb question, but how in this model does the universe become reheated, undergo (apparent) expansion & symmetry breaking, etc.? is it a simple fact of the distant future becoming essentially massless and thus a singularity of sorts?
i really like the idea but i can't wrap my head around this part of it.
Size doesn't matter is a core element in his theory. Any black hole does the job. I think that's the idea: white holes are new universes, new big bangs...
Think about movement produces heat. The BB rather unfortunately named. It is more of a start of movement/expansion of singularity.
Think about this: you breath in cold air, your breathing stops for a second, and you breath out. Incoming air colder, at stop it worms and start to move in opposite direction, outgoing air is much warmer.
@@LightshamanaDhyana Your example is almost certainly irrelevant: you can actually inhale air hotter than your body, it may feel uncomfortable but under 50C or so you can. In such cases the exhaling air is colder than the environment's. We don't breath because of temperature, we breath by mechanical pump, unconscious as it may be.
The problem with this theory is that Penrose can't explain what happens, just that photons through lack of sizing become the new big bang. I came up with this exact same theory in my early teens without any external input, just from knowing scientific basics at the time. But I don't think it's the way forward. I tend to believe that black holes eventually create new universes, and what we experience isnt a big bang but a big collapse, where the black hole 'explodes' but creates a shrinking universe inside, to us this looks like expansion but it is actually like a jar growing in size internally, but without the jar changing.
Then, all informations can be recorded on the conformational membrane and projected to form the existing universe.
Interesting statement. Can you elaborate a little more?
@@rajaa.i9713 Stanford professor Susskind thinks we are living in a holographic projected world.
@@chunglee7531 like living in the event horizon of a black hole?
@@rajaa.i9713if universe is just a holographic displays from its outer membrane, horizon events of a black hole may also be?
@@chunglee7531 we do live in a 'holographic' universe. in essence, anything that is created in our universe, a 3D DIMENSION that is, is a form of reverberation of energy manifested. there are also other universe with a different reverberation manifested, leading to multiverse theory.
Reminds me of the Battlestar Galactica reboot. All this has happened before. All this will happen again.
Most things are habit until it ends.
could gravity have to do with entanglement ? Early Universe was uniform and entangled . Black holes have higher gravity because its a big mass of entangled information/particles ?
How about if light reffraction has to do with gravity as well entanglement ? it does to me if we see the universe as 3 state matter found in that is PLASMA or stars that we could say is the neutral state, stars emite HOT LIGHT that is the second state that as it goes up out the system it will find electromagnetism that will make some of this light to returne back some light will make it through out the electromagnetism levels but sooner or latter light will find more electromagnetic halos that will trap this light and so do a recycle ones more. - The light refracted as it reffracts it gives out some heat so it becomes heavier than vapor so pushes down and produces gravity in a down push to a point that it neutralyzes with the out put of power of expantion from say our sun so it then takes the form of an UFO CRAFT as one light pushes up and the other down so is same thing that may bend light coming from outer stars, this 2 forces do kind of make look the stars or galaxies just like a rhomboid in a kind of magnetified glas.
Einstein would be extremely spooked at your suggestion... literally. He didn't like entanglement.
However I'd say that entanglement overruling the arrow of time, as in the DCQE experiment, strongly suggests that it can be explained precisely via General Relativity (as photons do not experience time, proper or "subjective" time, at all), adding thus fuel to what Penrose says at the end about quantum mechanics needing a good revision, while GR remains core.
So Penrose either assumes that all matter ends up in black holes, which is unlikely to be true, or that all matter eventually decays - and proton decay has not yet been shown.
49:20 diagram is fascinating
The lost papers are recovered @ 54:22
In zero gravity themodymic laws hold
It sounds like a reheated steady-state theory ... don’t see how the physics at the big-bang can be stitched into the physics of an expanded universe. The two are quite different and what happens to the arrow of time ... why don’t we see the reverse of Penrose’s process?
He noted that the reverse wont be possible becouse in his model imformation swallowed by black hole singularity's is lost forever, quite fitting actually, to erase causality at the end of one aeon, that way the new aeon starts out fresh and is not simply a determenistic process defined by its predecesseors.
@@trueredlucky954 interesting
What is anti of singularity
Does anyone consider that the cycles might loop back around like a hyper toroid?
So instead of multiple cycles in a straight line, each compression returns to the initial expansion, in an infinite progression. Each instance leads to a superposition of Many Worlds branching and expanding conformally. All of this happening in a sense simultaneously when viewed from an angle where the entirety of spacetime and its branches can be seen at once.
I'm interested in the geometry of that object.
No one is probably going to care that I said this. I'll respond to replies though.
I have no idea about what exactly you mean, however I just watched another conference by Penrose in which (near the beginning) he shows an image that is rather toroidal, you may be interested in that. This one: ruclips.net/video/hr_5QzbUqBw/видео.html
@@ivocanevo that is exactly my thought, the toroidal structure would account for the expanding universe easily, also for spin, and dozens of other things.
@@LuisAldamiz oh yeah, that twistor lecture. Penrose is such a genius. I may watch that again, but I'm pretty sure we couldn't connect any of that with what I was saying. Which is: in higher dimensions the beginning of one era could be the beginning of the next. If there's anything to it, I'm sure that Penrose would have considered it, as that's just the sort of thing he seems to like. I suppose it could be in his secret speculative notes. That would be validating for me, but I'm probably just on the wrong track.
So many people with a ticket for the bus trip. It just shows people love to think.
Why we take light cone opposite. Why it is not closed
Someone-yes, it was the late genius Stephen Hawking- declares that.Black holes evaporate and disappear and that is dispositive?
I love the jumbled mess of transparencies and the over-sized Stop Making Sense coat
EM ENERGY along with the vacuum of space together control the mechanics of the universe and it's expansion.
Ongoing creation of stars and their planets is happening throughout the universe and the hugh vacuum of infinate space is effecting the expansion of the universe. I can't see the neccessity of a BIg Bang except to deny the need for a Creator
Classic absentminded professor.
A universe comprising solely black holes and photons would be timeless. The duration over which a black hole would be effectively infinite in that there would be no other events to which to compare. I fail to see how the 'time' for ultimate blac holes to evaporate can be "physics". Is the 'bang' instantiated when the last boson passes over the universe's light horizon?
Penrose emphasizes that time is asymmetric due to noncommutative phase.
@@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 I need to read more to grok that... maybe more than my brain can digest.
If initial constraints vary light cone be any angle
Thank you Sir Roger Penrose .. Einstein was trying to make it static .. as Sir Isaac Newton's comment to machine and mechanics. Use the Einstein INCH .. is only mass and energy, only transferable.
Your comment is completely unintelligible. Frequent use of ellipses (I.e. …) doesn’t make you sound smart, it makes it harder to understand you
@@alexbuckley4378 Drop the circle below the electromagnetic force to unify. Neutrinos are solid mass flow at 0°K temperatures. Albert Einstein sought the INCH equation g = G Me/r^2(1e-/+Ef/Eo), the simple step to Applied Relativity 😀 😄 beyond General Relativity. 😆 🤣 drop the weight onto check valve Mechanical Equivalent of Heat, James Prescott Joule Faraday lens telescope an energy transfer. Physics has Unity published here to you and other printing press releases. 😆 🤣
@@alexbuckley4378 guess people are not smart, with Applied Relativity, Gravity Propulsion is superior knowledge and technology published to progress enlightenment forward, update the Theory of Flight, NP.
P = Po*gro*Qo*h + Pf*gf*Qvdf*h
Roger Penrose is the closest we will see of god
Does this mean that all previous eons would fit within a microscopic space of the current eon? That space between two points is not just mathematically infinite, but physically infinite?
He says that the eons are cyclical but my self dont see them such due that dont see how he sees a cycle, water cycle we have the sea water that goes up as vapor and comes as rain. - do you see any cycle in the eons?
@@espaciohexadimencionalsern3668 - Those kind of cycles you mention are thermodynamically consistent but for Penrose's theory, thermodynamics do not matter once you reach the singularity level (it's only an emergent property and not fundamental to physics as such). So they are not directly comparable: their cyclical nature is because they repeat again and again and again ad nauseam (ad infinitum to be more neutral).
"Does this mean that all previous eons would fit within a microscopic space of the current eon?"
It does not.
The eons looses all distance and time measurement at the "only photons phase". You can not compare size or time between eons because you do not have matter to compare it with.
It is even more fundamental .... there is no such thing as distance anymore as soon as everything (the photons left) is moving at the speed of light.
I have always heard the universe, but now its gotten so terribly loud. Whatever is going on its changing 🎧
What compress to black hole into singularity. What happened thermodynamics laws
He rejects them being fundamental, I agree: they are emergent properties only.
@@LuisAldamiz which make perfect sense, there is no disorder without discrete entities in homogen structure .
Pretty sure Zizec was asking one of the questions at the end of the lecture. Lol. The one about the universe loosing track of time and whether or not it was analogous to a tree falling over in a forest with no one around to hear it.
* massless neutrinos
@@MohsinRaza-eg8xn Any thing that could be light for me must to come from mass, how can there be a THING with out mass?
@@espaciohexadimencionalsern3668 Before you ask "how can something have no mass?" you should start with "what is mass and why does it exist?"
Photons don’t have mass @@espaciohexadimencionalsern3668
Starts at 13:00
What is relationship between time and mass
I'm not a physicist nor a mathematician. From what I understood Mass consists of particles vibrating at certain frequencies with high precision like a clock, hence time is brought to us.
Mass somehow (how?) causes space-time to curve inwards (what we usually call "gravity") and that affects more dramatically time for all I know.
Anyhow just browse videos and other materials on General Relativity and clocks and you should get it eventually, at least at a basic level of understanding.
It seems that at least three tug a wars all end up at the same question with calculations, glueing and different methods to me.
Why always take mass in down ward
What happened to time in black hole
Other than a horizon that’s a frozen ice pond.
I sure quantum mechanics is the past obeying the law of conservation of information and they are technically ghost participial. Like a hard drive that has bin formatted that information is still on the hard drive
What is mirror SYMERTIC of singuraity.
What? What do you mean by "mirror symmetric"? A singularity in a mirror (assuming photons could escape to form an image, which they can't) would be a mirrored singularity. Internally, as supposedly perfectly homogeneous, singularities must have p (mirror-like) symmetry anyhow in all three spatial axes, just like a sphere.
Penrose emphasizes that time is ASYMMETRIC. It's called noncommutative phase or quantum algebra as noncommutative geometry. Penrose admits he's not very good at that type of math.
@@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 - Time seems quite assymetric indeed: the past and the future are not the same, the future is always open, the past is always frozen.
But anyhow that would be T symmetry, which is not the same as P symmetry ("mirror" symmetry).
@@LuisAldamiz yes Penrose is talking about the massless universe of spacetime particles but still relativistic mass of pure radiation so there is no invariant rest mass as inertial mass - only relativistic gravitational mass based on noncommutative frequency inverse to time. So he uses the de Broglie-Einstein relation which is the same as de Broglie's Law of Phase Harmony. So essentially time is asymmetric as entropy only AFTER we assume spacetime causation but "primordial time" as a pure momentum energy that is still relativistic mass and is asymmetric as noncommutative phase. So there is reverse time and negative frequency at the same time as positive frequency and positive time. At the speed of light it is nonlocal causation from the perspective of the light being turned around as wavelength but light has a hidden "supermomentum" or relativistic mass that is noncommutative geometry.
B.G. Siddharth who predicted the dark energy accelerating expansion of the universe - he goes into this also - as does Paul S. Wesson (5D black hole universe model). Or you can read Gerard 't Hooft's article "Light is Heavy" - for details - with Martin van der Mark.
So the "mirror" symmetry is maintained in the zero point rest frame but the noncommutative phase is asymmetric time-frequency energy. It can only be measured "after" the fact in terms of spacetime linear causation due to the Uncertainty Principle from time-frequency uncertainty. So this means the information exists as pure energy before spacetime so it is energy as frequency-information inverse to time. So that means at the zero point in spacetime there ALREADY is a "fifth force" as noncommutative phase spin energy - a new "causative force" as Basil J. Hiley calls it (he's buddies with Penrose and Hiley helped Penrose coin the term Twistor)....
A good example of this are the "Negaparticles" discovered by Yakir Aharonov's research group using "weak measurement" in quantum nonlocal entangled photon experiments. Or also the Delayed Choice Eraser Experiments - promoted by Olivier Costa de Beauregard and now tested - both these experiments PROVE that the past can indeed be changed. thanks.
Alice in Wonderland and the magical mirror.
Near black hole if we downward sapce time with symmetric upwards space time we get whole universe where mass is spanding in space
In this consideration only Black holes not consideration of White hole, dark matter is not consideration
clocktious atoms
@33:06 🤔
12:30 roger finally starts. I hate long introductions
You cold be 30 years old and still turn doorknobs back wards with a deep mind.
Nice intro from prof Szabo !
12.27 save yourself
MY GOD ?????
Classic absentminded professor 😄
He's single minded focus, which is the consequence of his whole brain thinking.
I wouldn't wan to get into a bar fight with him...
eh?
Skip the first 12 minutes.... all waffle and no Roger.
Roger Penrose is a genius.
bez titulkov 😕
Na slovenských titulkoch pracujeme. Budú.
@@dzejty kedy budu titulky, prosim?
The procedure taught in Geometrical Drawing and Perspective Projection Techniques begins with a symbolic Eye of the Observer and various axes of 3D-T in the picture plane Perspective vanishing-into-no-thing within the Observer's plane, and if we apply Newtonian Fluxion-Integral Temporal superposition Calculus, (only the names are changed, the logarithmic temporal vector sync-duration functions remain components of orthogonal-normal axial-tangential infinite e-Pi-i relative-time-timing numberness).
The Observer's eye lenses are "where it all comes together" in 1-0-infinity instantaneous trancendental i-reflection containment, a thought experiment in eternal continuity. Every body knows the existence-experience in some degree of being here-now in pulse-evolution differentiates integrated Quantum Chemistry.
Assembling abstract self-defining coherence-cohesion objectives in AM-FM Timing-spacing coordination alignments require a detailed training program to develop from reactive to apply projection-drawing techniques to not only use this GD&P Actuality reference frame to produce an overall coherence, but also QM-TIME cohesion of holographic resonances in time duration timing modulation interference positioning, in this Perspective Principle.
The time has come, eternally, to review, reiterate and reset orientation to the state of Math-Physics in the Actuality of QM-TIMESPACE Holographic Imagery.
He certainly can put geometric objects to their premium used.
1:25:47 Dude asking question sounds like Slavoj Zizek.
I can't understand a word he's saying, I can't even tell if he's speaking English or not?
@@isonlynameleft - don't be a bigot
🇺🇳1:28:47 ²43:41
The sound is just awful, unlistenable almost, although weirdly it's much better during the 12 minutes of opening waffle.. this always happens with Penrose, its like modern equipment is not set up for his style of anything (at least they got him an OHP, but still, the sound..! it's important!)
* It sounds like the mic is on the table or something, it picks up the flicking of sheets a lot.. I think you should have given him a Britney mic, for future reference
Watch him on Joe Rogan. You hear every brilliant word and mumble.
I could hear everything almost perfectly and I'm not even using headphones.
They fixed sound after 2 minutes. What is your attention span? xD
Like 3 minutes ..
"Sir Roger" or "Sir Roger Penrose" but not "Sir Penrose". I'm sure he is unconcerned.
I marvel at this intellect; yet, it doesn’t make it so just because the late Steven Hawking theorized “Hawking Areas,” Academia are a closed group and they get their papers published only when in lock-step agreement. Write something contrary snd watch your grant money get jerked.
It Doesn’t sound inviting either. Makes you sorta glad if it ain’t your problem. 😂
The sound engineer needs sacking.
At Simple Roger's cookies, we've captured simple Roger's memory of discovering the solution to everything, and played it on a loop for his sedated mind. Simple Roger's neural transmitters are then extracted and baked into each and every Simple Roger Cookie. Know the glory of genius, with Simple Roger's Cookies.
Simple? I wish for your mind.
@@brendawilliams8062 The only thing I have in common with Roger, is the fact that I read "Dragons Egg", and he gave the recommend so, Roger has a better mind than I do. The joke was a Rick and Morty reference that bombed I guess.
@@nebula1919191 you are better read than I am. So are others. Rest that your comment is there.
Expanding space is naked empire.
Nucleus of atoms expanding and recycling expanding pushing force which have example nature of expanding light. Expanding light waves is dark pushing force for us, but because we can register photons, we know there is also waves.
Expanding lights interactive with eachother and thats why old light is redshifted light cosmologys way.
Also expanding light moving faster and faster same way what matter and light expanding.
That explain
1. Bending light near star and galaxy
2. Cosmologys way redshifted light
3. "Gravity" redshifted light
🤔
But why the combover? Lol. Great guy. Asset to us all! Just teasing about his hair, but it be great if he didn’t do it. Lol
I hate to have to correct Penrose but "eon" is from Ancient Greek,and it means century,100 years.
Thats why in Greek you write 21st century as 21ος Αιωνας ,(Eonas).
It does carry the meaning of a long period of time if you use it broadly speaking.
I d expect a scientist of his caliber to have done some research(or just ask friends,it s not that uncommon knowledge) before making such claims.
It doesn make the rest of his claims really not that trustworthy...
The word aeon /ˈiːɒn/, also spelled eon (in American English), originally meant "life", "vital force" or "being", "generation" or "a period of time", though it tended to be translated as "age" in the sense of "ages", "forever", "timeless" or "for eternity". It is a Latin transliteration from the koine Greek word ὁ αἰών (ho aion), from the archaic αἰϝών (aiwon). In Homer it typically refers to life or lifespan. Its latest meaning is more or less similar to the Sanskrit word kalpa and Hebrew word olam. A cognate Latin word aevum or aeuum (cf. αἰϝών) for "age" is present in words such as longevity and mediaeval.[1]
Although the term aeon may be used in reference to a period of a billion years (especially in geology, cosmology and astronomy), its more common usage is for any long, indefinite period. Aeon can also refer to the four aeons on the geologic time scale that make up the Earth's history, the Hadean, Archean, Proterozoic, and the current aeon, Phanerozoic.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeon
You are wrong. From Wikitionary:
αἰών • (aiṓn) m (genitive αἰῶνος); third declension
lifetime
generation
a long period of time, eon, epoch, age
the current world
eternity
@@LuisAldamiz it sounds like more or less the same idea to me in any case, but thanks for your reply
@@Yes-gw3zg - I was replying to George, main thread. An eon is not a century, not now not in ancient Greece, but an indefinitely long period of time.
Fun fact, Roger Penrose has 160 iq ;)
Is Sir Penrose the quintessential absent minded professor or what?
What makes you think he is absent minded???? Given his very poor eyesight - not to mention his age - he seems to me to be incredibly present minded :-)
The low delivery genotypically tie because flood histochemically connect minus a historical loan. keen, early beret
Kto dá na toto dislike? :O
:(
Iba nevzdelani hlupaci. A na nazore hlupaka predsa nezalezi 👍
@@kombasanpracka Ked sa zvoli za prezidenta Harabin alebo Kotleba tak mozem povedat ze zalezi :D
@@OfficialDaddys2 Takto rozsirenom ponimani mas pravdu. A je to mrzute. Liekom su dve riesenia - nedemokraticke alebo utopicke.
The main problem with modern physics,lies in their attempt to know everything, such as the theory of every thing. I find it very disturbing. As I see it, besides being observable and verifiable, belief in independence of mathematical algorithm holds the key that explains human limitation and divine design.
In our galaxy millions of BH roam around at great speed, yet not one came near our solar system in 4.5 billion years wiping out everything, protecting us evolve life and consciousness on earth with perfection and with probability one, winning millions of lotteries over billions of years (like the BH we missed). Mankind will never know the algorithm of the universal quantum computing function of Maldacena's conjecture.
Black holes don't generally wipe out everything, they are just like any other object of their mass (i.e. a sizable star in the case of stellar mass BHs), just that pitch black instead of shiny. Their pop fame as hungry monsters is all kinds of unjustified, they generate gravitational attraction just as any other thing floating out there.
It took them 15 minutes to figure out his microphone was off.
well, the lecture starts at time 12:40 of the video, so it took them 2 minutes :)
Oh so 17 minutes wow they must be A-list Physicists lol@@MatFyzjeIn
what? next time try watch the video before commenting
were you the ones fixing the microphone or were you seated in the back?@@MatFyzjeIn
no, we were shooting and editing video. problem there was, that during testing sir Roger Penrose was standing and speaking different, that he starts speaking during actual lecture. so someone from audio guys must go fix the mic shortly after he starts
as is almost always the case, horrible sound technicians in these lectures makes the entire lecture shit,
why can hollywood but science cant ?
Wtf is always with these long ass introductions?
The sound is horrible - Turning off. Sorry.
No idea why you say that, I could understand all perfectly well.
@@LuisAldamiz well done!
They fixed it in 15:00. It is baffling someone could turn down Penrose because they couldn't last 2f minutes. Sign of our times, I guess.