Singer is a polemicist against Christianity, so there's that. Nevertheless, history is littered with men who set themselves up as starters of cults, some are just more successful than others.
Everybody starting a religion is like Joseph Smith. The people who made up Genesis in 3rd-century BC, in furtherance of their theocratic revolutionary dictatorship, were _also_ like Joseph Smith.
Rabbi Singer has a lot of great information to share and I do enjoy hearing what he has to say in most instances; however he also has a gift for avoiding giving a direct answer to uncomfortable questions. In this particular interview he does this on two separate occasions. In one example he avoids addressing the super chat question regarding the dishonesty around Isaac's blessing. He literally avoids any language about dishonesty or trickery despite this is the exact language found in the text and Singer goes on a tangent about the role Jewish women play in the home. Otherwise his take on Paul is very interesting and probably fairly accurate if we accept the position of scholars regarding dating and authenticity of certain letters etc. Jacob is bringing light to more modern ideas that include multiple authors and push the dates of the letters into the second century, which really changes the game quite a bit.
Rabbi Singer doesn't know what he is talking about. He is outraged by the conversion of many Jews to christianity and this has affected his mental ability
I'm not going to comment on Tovia on a personal level. I spent years doing that and no need rehashing. I gave you a like. In response to the video and the comment, one thing Tovia is consistently wrongwith, as is the majority of Christianity, is Paul's stance on the Torah. Christians however have a crutch to lean on with ignorance. Tovia doesn't. When you come at Paul with a Jewish perspective, which Tovia has, it's quite easy to see his arguments and how to read them.
The problem is that instead of delivering the bible complete, in one piece, supposedly this all-knowing god dribbles it out, bit by bit, over the centuries by various spokespeople who self-affirm they are speaking on behalf of the big guy. So that one's prophet is another one's blasphemer, and jointly all of them are truly the authors of confusion.
God never wrote anything down. He didn:t "deliver" the Bible like an author delivers his latest novel or instruction manual. God works in and through history, through the actual lives of men. You absolute genius.
"...Paul was the great Coryphaeus, and first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus. These palpable interpolations and falsifications of his doctrines led me to try to sift them apart." An extract from a letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Short, April 13 1820
Paul was such a con man. I just wrote a book: "Romans Proves Paul Lied". A review of all of Romans, with comments exposing his lies, followed by the foundation of Matthew from the Hebrew translation, followed by the 3000 year old Covenant that proves Jesus was restoring the Covenant - retelling the Covenant Standards that were altered 1000 years before him - not nailing them to a cross. Modern proof Jesus was directly inspired by Elohim.
Rabbi keeping it 100! Paul and his salvation-theology-cult basically ruined the first 20 years of my life. 99.9% of Christians don't practice Christianity...they practice Paulanity. Great interview!
True. Jesus told the rich young ruler in order to have eternal life, he must sell everything he has and give it to the poor. I was a Christian for 20 years, and I never heard anyone doing that. Hell, they always prayed for more......
@@perfectblindguy Your a LIAR, Jesus did NOT say that. Here is the portion of scripture that you obviously have NEVER READ IN YOUR LIFE !! Jesus said, " but if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS. He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet? Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me." (Matthew 19:17-21) The young ruler "claimed" that he was "perfect" in OBEYING the 10 Commandments, but did not realize that HIS POSSESSIONS WERE HIS IDOLS that he was unable to part with, WHICH IS BREAKING THE 1ST COMMANDMENT, "Thou shalt have NO OTHER GODS BEFORE ME". So get your facts straight !!
I wouldn't say he's keeping it 100, but he is being real about Paul. I say this as someone who follows Matthew's Jesus (ie Mattew & Mark). To the other commenter, concerning the identity of the rich young ruler, I've often wondered that same thing. But you state it so definitively. Where are you deriving such confidence? Genuine question
@@AnHebrewChild Paul is Zacherias barachai the Blessed benedictus who is also the Camillus (lackey, abdes, acolyte, water-carrier) who can not match up with the man in charge, rather go through the eye of the needle. In other words Drusus germanicus as a failed rightfull pretender (James the Just) was unable to challenge Tiberius Princeps , He was slain between the altar and the temple, hench he could not enter the highest office.
The book of Acts was written to justify Saul / Paul of Tarsus and his gospel. Saul / Paul of Tarsus brought in the gospel according to Balaam. It is unbelievable the mountain that a protestant will climb to justify Saul/ Paul of Tarsus. I'm amassed when a protestant will say Jesus the Christ said and then quote Saul/ Paul of Tarsus.
@SamKidder-yd2qo - Why are you "amassed" ?? Could it be that YOU have also NEVER read the NT for yourself, so therefore you do NOT "know" that Jesus and Paul taught the VERY SAME THING ?? Pitiful......
🎯 Key points for quick navigation: 00:01 *🎙 Introduction and Topic Overview* - Introduction of the live stream and the guest, Rabbi Tovia Singer, - Overview of the discussion topic: Paul the Apostle being potentially a liar and a conman. 01:11 *📜 Paul's Misrepresentation of the Torah* - Paul alters the Hebrew Bible to fit his agenda, - Opposes ritual commandments, promotes faith alone for salvation, - Claims non-Jews are one with Jews in Christ, altering scriptures to support this. 04:19 *🔎 Character and Writings of Paul* - Paul as a highly disagreeable person based on his letters, - Conflict with fellow Christians and leaders of the Jerusalem Church, - View of himself as the foremost apostle, criticizing others like Peter. 08:21 *🚪 Breakaway Sect and Paul's Influence* - Comparison of early Christianity to a breakaway sect like Mormonism to Protestant Christianity, - Paul likened to Joseph Smith, creating significant differences in theology, - Emphasis on Paul's authoritative and influential role in Christianity. 12:10 *🏛 Paul's Personal Ambition and Behavior* - Paul's desire for power and authority, - Claims direct revelation from Jesus Christ to assert dominance, - His boasting about his background and persecution of Christians. 17:00 *🛡 Paul's Credentials and Self-Justification* - Discussion of Paul's claims about his credentials and background, - His self-justification in his letters, presenting himself as credible and authoritative, - His exaggeration of his persecution of Christians. 20:34 *📚 Paul's Epistles and Influence on Canon* - The style and temperament of Paul's writings, - His influence on other letters attributed to him, - The central role of Paul's epistles in the Christian Bible and his assertive nature. 26:26 *🔄 Paul's Adaptability and Deception* - Paul justifies using different approaches to convert Jews and Gentiles. - The ends justify the means for Paul, using pretense and boastfulness to bring people to Christianity. - Influences on modern groups like Jews for Jesus and the Messianic movement. 29:06 *👎 Paul's Character and Misconduct* - Paul is portrayed as an undesirable person to associate with. - Instances of Paul's rudeness and confrontation with Jewish authorities. - Comparison of Paul’s portrayal to Jesus' in the Gospels, focusing on suffering and persecution. 32:06 *🚨 Missionary Tactics and Modern Impacts* - Missionaries in Israel emulate Paul's tactics of provoking and recording confrontations. - Videos depicting these confrontations are used to claim persecution. - Paul’s influence on these tactics is highlighted, suggesting a continuity from his methods. 35:06 *📜 Authenticity of Acts and Paul’s Persecution* - Doubts about the historical accuracy of Paul’s persecution narratives in Acts. - Similarities between the stories of Paul in Acts and Jesus in the Gospels. - The use of these stories to portray Paul as suffering unfairly for his faith. 38:04 *🤝 Divergence in Christology: Paul vs. Luke* - Differences in how Paul and the author of Luke/Acts view Jesus' death and its significance. - Paul’s view of Jesus' death as a ransom vs. Luke’s emphasis on repentance. - Contrasts in the portrayal of Jesus' resurrection body between Paul and Luke. 41:11 *💡 Interpretation of Jesus' Death and Repentance* - Luke’s perspective that Jesus' death prompts repentance, not as a ransom for sins. - Importance of repentance in Luke’s theology, contrasting with Paul’s substitutionary atonement. - Examples from Acts demonstrating this theological difference. 44:03 *🗣 Misrepresentation of the Law in Galatians* - Paul’s claim that the law was given by angels, not directly by God. - This claim undermines the authority of the Torah, aligning with Paul’s argument in Galatians 3. - Examination of Paul's theological motives and the implications of his arguments. 47:18 *📖 Faith vs. Law: Misquoting Habakkuk* - Paul’s misuse of Habakkuk 2:4 to argue against the necessity of following the law. - Explanation of the original context of Habakkuk, focusing on faith in the end times. - Paul's reinterpretation of "faith" to support his antinomian stance. 52:13 *🐂 Paul's Misinterpretation of Animal Welfare Law* - Paul misapplies the law about not muzzling an ox to support missionaries financially. - The original context in Deuteronomy 25:4 is about animal welfare, not human support. - Rabbi Tovia Singer criticizes this as a deliberate misuse to serve Paul's agenda. 55:41 *📚 Transition to RUclips and Electronic Media* - Rabbi Singer explains his shift from writing books to creating RUclips content. - Electronic media allows immediate and wide-reaching communication. - This medium is seen as more effective in countering missionary efforts. 59:12 *📖 Paul's Identity and Greek Influence* - Debate on whether Paul was Jewish or a Hellenized Jew. - Paul’s teachings, such as spiritual resurrection, align more with Greek thought. - Contrasts between Jewish physical resurrection beliefs and Greek spiritual resurrection. 01:03:20 *⚔ Gospel Accounts and Resurrection Debate* - Differences in gospel accounts of Jesus' resurrection reflect apologetic efforts. - Paul’s spiritual resurrection concept vs. gospel accounts of physical resurrection. - Discrepancies in gospel narratives aim to address early Christian theological conflicts. 01:07:45 *📜 Paul as a Liar and Conman* - Rabbi Singer likens Paul to modern conmen like Joseph Smith. - Paul's actions and writings are seen as self-serving rather than divinely inspired. - Contrasts Paul's confrontational stance with Peter against the harmonious portrayal in the Gospels. 01:12:33 *👩👦 Matriarchal Insight in the Torah* - Discussion on the role of women in recognizing spiritual truths in the Torah. - Examples include Rebecca’s understanding of Jacob’s destiny over Esau. - The theme of women having spiritual insight where men do not. 01:16:12 *🌍 Paul's Ministry and Target Audience* - Paul primarily focused on converting Gentiles rather than Jews. - Gentiles were more receptive to Paul’s reinterpretations of Jewish scripture. - Paul's failures in certain regions are noted, but his strategy was to target those who lacked direct access to Jewish texts. 01:18:43 *📜 Misinterpretation of Isaiah 7:14* - Isaiah 7:14 is not about a miraculous virgin birth, - The Hebrew word for virgin (betulah) does not appear in Isaiah 7, - The names of Isaiah's children are symbolic of Judah's deliverance. 01:23:14 *📚 Paul and Jewish Law* - Paul's stance is completely opposed to keeping the law, - He advocates against observing Jewish commandments in favor of faith in Christ, - Paul and the gospel writers are influenced by Greek culture and theater. 01:26:14 *🔍 Paul's Alleged Scriptural Basis* - Discussion on whether Joel 3:6 relates to Paul's ministry, - Joel 3 in Hebrew Bible focuses on Jewish restoration, - No clear connection to Paul's mission. 01:27:40 *✡ Suffering and Transformation in Judaism* - Jewish concept of suffering leading to repentance and transformation, - Historical and contemporary events can profoundly change people, - Jewish literature supports the idea that suffering can lead to spiritual growth. 01:34:05 *🕊 Misuse of Jewish Texts by Missionaries* - Missionaries exploit rabbinic literature to support Christian doctrines, - There is a contradiction as they claim not to believe in these texts, - The absence of direct support for Christian doctrines in the Hebrew Bible leads to these manipulations. 01:36:49 *✍ Paul's Misrepresentation of the Torah* - Paul frequently misquotes the Hebrew Bible to fit a Christian narrative, - Example from 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 where he cites non-existent scripture, - Mistranslations and fabrications are common in Paul's writings. Made with HARPA AI ```
@Sijo2 - This is what Tovia Singer is "hiding" from you because YOU REFUSE to read the NT for YOURSELF !! Paul said this about the LAW. "For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law." (Romans 13:8-10) "Know you not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS SHALL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, SHALL INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (1st Corinthians 6:9,10) "Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I TELL YOU BEFORE AS I HAVE ALSO TOLD YOU IN TIME PAST, that THEY WHICH DO SUCH THINGS WILL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (Galatians 5:19-21) ""But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, WE OURSELVES ARE ALSO FOUND SINNERS, is therefore Christ THE MINISTER OF SIN ? GOD FORBID ! .For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself A TRANSGRESSOR." (Galatians 2:17,18) "What shall we say then? SHALL WE CONTINUE IN SIN, , that grace may abound? GOD FORBID !. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?" (Romans 6:1,2) " What shall we say then? IS THE LAW SIN ? GOD FORBID !. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet....Wherefore THE LAW IS HOLY, and THE COMMANDMENT HOLY, AND JUST, AND GOOD." (Romans 7:7,12) Don't you feel a little "foolish" now ?? Don't be "spiritually" LAZY and read the New Testament FOR YOURSELF !!
The red letter words will change your life. Don't be distracted by church doctrines and/or the arguments against church doctrines. Go directly to the red letter words and read them for yourself.
@sebolddaniel - Allow me to open your eyes a little wider....This is what Paul said about the LAW. "For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law." (Romans 13:8-10) "Know you not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS SHALL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, SHALL INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (1st Corinthians 6:9,10) "Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I TELL YOU BEFORE AS I HAVE ALSO TOLD YOU IN TIME PAST, that THEY WHICH DO SUCH THINGS WILL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (Galatians 5:19-21) ""But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, WE OURSELVES ARE ALSO FOUND SINNERS, is therefore Christ THE MINISTER OF SIN ? GOD FORBID ! .For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself A TRANSGRESSOR." (Galatians 2:17,18) "What shall we say then? SHALL WE CONTINUE IN SIN, , that grace may abound? GOD FORBID !. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?" (Romans 6:1,2) " What shall we say then? IS THE LAW SIN ? GOD FORBID !. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet....Wherefore THE LAW IS HOLY, and THE COMMANDMENT HOLY, AND JUST, AND GOOD." (Romans 7:7,12) Don't you feel a little "foolish" now ?? Don't be "spiritually" LAZY and read the New Testament FOR YOURSELF !!
@sirlordcomic - I know that you probably do not understand this, but there is no such thing as "growing up Christian", although I understand completely what you "mean". A biblical "Christian" is someone who has received a "Revelation" from God that Jesus is the Christ, (Matthew 16:17) (John 6:44,45). If you read the parable of the "Sower Sows the Word", Jesus REVEALS EXACTLY what happened to you and why you don't believe and why you left His Words. You can find the parable in Matthew 13, Mark 4, & Luke 8.
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms The Bible does a wonderful job of reminding us that FAITH is the backbone of whether we will be 'redeemed' and offers all kinds of rational as to why we should believe these mythological writings as 'true'. Amazing Fear vs Reward marketing. Same with Islam. Ancient cult writers knew what they were doing to create followers by lying with convincing flair
@@travisjazzbo3490 If you ever read the New Testament for YOURSELF and actually "knew" the "biblical" definition of "FAITH", you would immediately "delete" your clueless post above. See, you are like most "Christians" who believe that FAITH is "blindly" believing something that you have no "evidence" for, which could not be further from the TRUTH. Hebrews 11 reveals the TRUTH about FAITH, which involves GOD "speaking" or "revealing" something to you IN REALITY, just like Enoch, Noah, Abraham, and ALL TRUE Christians have experienced. Your "opinions" & "assumptions" are NOT TRUTH. ON;LY GOD REVEALS TRUTH, therefore, "You" are in DARKNESS.
19:20 Jews who worked with the Roman Empire, of which there were many in significant positions of power, did in fact go around and stone Christians. When Jesus was causing an insurrection, Jews who worked for Rome, like the Herodians, verifiably killed Christians.
@zachio69 - It seems that you are yet ANOTHER who has NOT read the New Testament for YOURSELF and have "chosen" to believe LIES from your "false rabbi". So let me do your "homework" for you and see if you STILL will choose to remain "willfully ignorant"...BOTH JESUS & PAUL TAUGHT SALVATION IS NOT "Mans" Work, BUT 100% GOD'S WORK : JESUS said, "It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, WHO THEN CAN BE SAVED ? But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, ... WITH MEN THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE; but WITH GOD ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE." (Matthew 19:24-26) PAUL said, " For BY GRACE are you SAVED THROUGH FAITH; and that NOT OF YOURSELVES: It is the GIFT OF GOD: NOT OF WORKS, lest any man should boast." (Ephesians 2:8,9) BOTH JESUS & PAUL TAUGHT TO OBEY THE 10 COMMANDMENTS **************************************************** JESUS said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honor thy father and thy mother: and, THOU SHALT LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF." (Matthew 19:18,19) PAUL said, "For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, THOU SHALT LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF."(Romans 13:9) ******************************************** BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT "ONE GOD" ******************************************** "JESUS answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is ONE LORD:" (Mark 12:29) PAUL said, "and that there is none other GOD but ONE....but to us there is but ONE GOD.."(1st Corinthians 8:4,6) ********************************************* BOTH JESUS & PAUL TAUGHT FORGIVENESS OF SINS THROUGH JESUS' BLOOD ********************************************* JESUS said, "For this is MY BLOOD of the New Testament, which is shed for many FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS" (Matthew 26:28) PAUL said, "in whom we have redemption through HIS BLOOD, THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS, according to the riches of his grace;" (Ephesians 1:7) ******************************************** BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT THAT JESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO THE FATHER ***************************************************************** "JESUS saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: NO MAN COMES UNTO THE FATHER BUT BY ME." (John 14:6) PAUL said, "for THROUGH HIM,(Jesus), we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father." (Ephesians 2:18) ************************************************************* BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT THAT JESUS WAS SINLESS ************************************************************* JESUS said, "Which of you convinces me of SIN? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?" (John 8:46) PAUL said, "For he hath made him to be sin for us, WHO KNEW NO SIN; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." (2nd Corinthians 5:21) ********************** Would you like 100 more scriptures ??
Deuteronomy 30: Moses says the most important thing to follow the Law. It is not too hard, but "close to you, in your mouth and heart to do it" Romans 10 (quoting Deuteronomy 30): Following the Law is bad. It's too hard and only faith matters.
At 45:56 in the video Rabbi Tovia Singer mentions Acts 7 where the writer of Acts writes it wrong about the Patriarch's more than that the writer wrote that Stephen (supposedly) said about ("Abraham that Abraham bought from the sons of Hamor,") the field which Jacob took and bought from the sons of Hamor
Same thing with Acts 1:20 verse the writer gets Psalms 69:25 wrong about how the verse on in Psalms 69:25 was written about 'May (their) place be deserted let there be no one to dwell in (their) tents.'
Paul was a liar. Maybe he had contacts with the Roman government. At least he was into power and claimed to had a vision of Jesus but that probably only happened in his dreams. Moses never existed.
@leonkrajenbrink1873 - I love it when "clueless reprobates" make "absolute" statements like "Paul was a Liar & Moses never existed". Jesus said it best, "I thank you, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because YOU HAVE HID THESE THINGS FROM THE WISE & PRUDENT, and has revealed them unto babes." (Matthew 11:25)
As a Christian myself, I can say that a tremendous amount of Christian disagreement would vanish away if you removed the writings of Paul. Especially Romans ch.9. Talk about a treasure chest of disagreement and confusion! Also, the whole, no women pastors or teachers, and women aren't even allowed to speak in church? This all comes from Paul and no one else? The Bible says everything must be established by 2 or 3 witnesses, yet we have major Christian doctrines and disagreements based on the testimony of a single man. I just have a very real problem with that.
The problem is, there are only a select few of Paul’s epistles which are agreed upon by scholars as being authentic and actually written by Paul. The first and second letter to the Timothy, which is known as the Pastoral epistles (if I’m correct) as it is so called was one of the contested letters that were not included. I do find it crazy how we just accept things because someone tells us. We should always test everything and everybody. I believe that was one of things the congregation at Ephesus was praised for by Jesus as they tested those who claimed to be apostles. I am not saying Paul is a false apostle either. I don’t know. I sometimes wonder if there were letters written in Paul’s name as it was common during that time of pseudo-writers with agendas and Paul did warn about in some of his letters to be aware that there were some who were trying to do this and using his name (and hence authority) to introduce their own doctrines so to speak.
A tremendous amount of disagreements would vanish if people took peters warning that Paul was hard to understand, and also didn't use English chapter breaks. Romans has to be read in blocks usually covering a few chapters at a time with no stop. Romans 9 is no exception.
@@shayalynn At least you are being honest when you say that "you don't 'know' that Paul is a false Apostle", (which he is definitely NOT). The problem is, "scholars" CANNOT "impart" TRUTH, ONLY GOD CAN, so HOW are you going to "test everything and everybody" ??Y You actually need the "Witness of God Himself" in order to determine if Paul's letters are "legit", which is EXACTLY what God will give you when you receive His Word into the "Good Ground" of your heart, (Luke 8:15), and receive the "Spiritual Birth", (John 3:3-5) (John 1:12,13) (1st Peter 1:23) (James 1:18).
@robbyclark6915 - What ?? How can you make a statement like that and call yourself a "Christian" ?? How many times have you read the New Testament, "once" ?? What is wrong with Romans Chapter 9 ?? If I were you, I would "Examine yourself, whether you be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates? " (2nd Corinthians 13:5)
Philippians 1:18 But what does it matter? The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached. And because of this I rejoice. This is why it matters, A lie is a lie, and it matters to people who follow God! It is that simple! Glory be to God, alone! In this I rejoice! God Bless!
@charleslitherbury8600 - You are absolutely "clueless" !! If you are "sincerely" preaching the Gospel OR NOT "sincerely" preaching the Gospel, the Truth of the Gospel is STILL being preached. You obviously do not know the difference between a "false motive" and a "Lie"....google it and learn something today !!
I love how people can try to call others names or declare themselves the judge of all character of others after they are long gone and unable to defend themselves. The man preached the word of God to the Gentiles for the most part while the other Apostles preached the gospel to the Jewish people. Paul was beheaded for preaching the gospel and the other Apostles were martyred as well except John who was exiled to the isle of Patmos. All together today anyone can know God because the Veil was torn at the Crucifixion of Christ and all can enter to seek God beyond the torn Veil where ANYONE can be set free from the eternal bonds of Sin. There is no more Temple standing at the moment and in the meantime we can seek God the way Paul teaches where by Faith we can know God and it’s by Faith that we are all given as a gift to understand God with Romans12v3. Why Faith? Because none of us can see God right now and Gods presence anyways is not found in a temple anymore but resides inside oneself when they become a born again person. Today one must become reborn again to see the Kingdom of God John3v3. And the Kingdom of God is a spiritual kingdom that one can know that is explained in the Bible and talked about but to know it intimately you have to born anew and leave your old life at the Cross.
King Aretas IV (the 4th) had no control on over the city of Damascus on at that time and Paul says that he escaped from King Aretas IV (the 4th) then went into Arabia Nabataean where King Aretas IV (the 4th) reigned on in?
To be fair, the oldest Israelite traditions included human sacrifice, and there are breadcrumbs leading back to this in the Hebrew Bible -- Yhwh did not thirst after only the blood of animals. The story of Jephthah comes to mind, in which the spirit of Yhwh descends upon him, then he makes the oath to sacrifice whoever walks out of his house after he returns victorious, and then Yhwh makes him victorious and accepts the sacrifice of his daughter, which is not much different from the human sacrifices for victory carried out by the neighboring nations against whom Israel fought. The Tanakh includes laws demanding the sacrifice of the first born, as well as a law saying that anyone committed to being sacrificed could not be redeemed. Ezekiel wrote that Yhwh gave Israel an evil law, specifically the sacrifice of the first born, as a punishment. While Judaism moved away from the practice of blood magic sacrifices, it is an undeniable part of the religion's history. In this sense, the god of Paul is closer to that primordial god of bloodlust than the modern Jewish god. And importantly, the prophetic critique of temple worship was ineffective, unimportant, and uninfluential until the Romans destroyed the temple and put an end to Jewish blood sacrifices, so Paul was not out of alignment with the Judaism of his day. Edits: spelling, format, phrasing
Tovia is an absolute legend. 12 minute video by Michael Menasgotz proves that Christianty is a roman creation, they left their signature in the gospels.
Don’t fall for unsupported conspiracy theories no actual biblical scholar believes in. Tbh, that one is dumb on its face even with no expert knowledge on Ancient Greek literature.
@@Mercury-Wells couple of important things regarding this: 1) The martyrdoms of the apostles are entirely fabricated, DarkMatter2525 did a good job proving this in his 40 minute video "Did the Apostles Die for a Lie?", in which he shows how the Church clearly fabricated stories and had clear intent. For example, Capholic church invented the idea that paul was "beheaded", but its a false tradition/invention. There is also a good book called "The Myth of Persecution | How Early Christians Invented A Story of Martyrdom" by Candida Moss. She shows how stories of christian persecution were forged in order to bolster the beliefs of christians - its quite a simple yet effective tactic. Jesus says that preaching his message will get you "persecuted".
@@Mercury-Wells 2) Romans killing Krastians is a made up story.. Roman writings never mention this killing of Krastians - it did not make it into the historical record. There were several sects of Krastianity who were often at great odds with each other. Most of them increased their numbers by including even enemies of Rome amongst their ranks. The Official Roman sponsored Krastians would throw the contenders aka all who believed in a different version of the Kristos or romanized version of the messianic prophesies' Messiah and or his history. Why would Rome massacre Krastians if they were taught to live a peaceful life from the JC teachings? Makes no sense, even the Romans were very liberal with others cultures and religions as long as they did not question authority - and the gospels clearly say that governments are instituted by God himself and to not rebel against them, and to render unto Kayzar his taxes for he is appointed by god himself here on this earth, and to turn the other cheek. 3) There were laws which persecuted Krastian groups that rested on Shabat, the law forced them to work on Shabat in order to not "juedaize" Shabat. The gospels always talk about how persecution comes from the Jewels not the Jentyles. The real persecution was of Jeuweish messianic rebels. "Krastians" persecuted were actually heretical Jewels , paul persecuted them , paul replaced Mozes law and hated cirkumcision.
Unlike the pastors, preachers or priests today, Paul did not have any gospels to rely on when talking abt Jesus. He was not aware that Jesus had urged the believers to take holy eucharist. All Paul knew is Jesus had taught about LOVE...love God, love thy neighbours love the gentiles, love yor haters, love yr enemies etc!
Arabia ties to Nabataean where King Aretas IV (the 4th that is) took and reigned as king during the time of Herod Antipas at the time period of 37 A.D. because Herod Antipas got defeated on in 37 A.D. by King Aretas (IV the 4th) according to history records that is
Rebeka and Jacob conspired to decieve Isaac? And this act denies the blessing to Eusa? How then is the blessing then shared with all of Israel and not only Judah the oldest of the sons? And why not to all the sons of Abraham especially his first born Ishmael?
Did Apostle Paul ever mention ("Tertius,") the supposed writer of the book (or the "letter,") of Romans did Apostle Paul ever take and mention or write about Tertius on in any of his letters?
I realized Jesus death was exactly like killing a virgin for a good harvest about 10 years ago. That was the end of Christianity for me. I have long thought Paul was a Kenneth Copeland grifter for a really long time. A Joseph Smith kind of guy is even more accurate! 🤣
@26beegee A New Covenant wasn't prophesied? Jeremiah 31:31-34 Jeremiah 50:1-5 The Old Covenant was honored by Israel? Deuteronomy 31:16 Hosea 8:1 Jeremiah 11:10 1 Kings 19:10 God accepts Israel's sacrifices to atone for their sins? Malachi 2:8-14 Jeremiah 6:20 Amos 5:21-22 Hosea 9:4 Isaiah 1:11-17
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms I have a brain, therefore, I can realize, understand, become enlightened, learn, reason, think, imagine, figure out, feel, think and decide among many other things my brain enables me to do. I do not have to be a god to do any of those things. And guess what!?!? You are capable of doing all those things too! Isn’t the brain amazing? It even keeps our blood flowing, our lungs to breathe continuously, our kidneys and bowels to function, reproduce and all the other functions required to keep our bodies and species functioning that we don’t even have to think about! No god required for any of those things. Every living animal, plant and every living thing is an amazing eco-system all on its own! If there were such a thing as miracles I would call life itself a miracle. But since there are no miracles I will call every living thing an amazing wonder of nature. I can almost guarantee I value life more than you do! Sure hope you reach enlightenment some day so you can be amazed by the natural wonders all around you!
Atheism is very good way for sinners hide from truth about God.they can crime against god before catch.they can disturb next generation with out proper añswer .proud of there wealth they hide in there den .once devil come and chain to eternal wicked place
@perfectblindguy - Why would God NOT "love animals" ?? He created them for us to take care of, and HE did NOT create anything to be "killed", as God is the author of LIFE, NOT "death".
@@aaronmatzkin7966 - A very "ignorant" statement from a "corrupt" carnal human being who Jesus died for, so that what happened in the beginning (which you are "clueless" to), would be taken care of in the end. Keep "spitting" in the eye of your Creator, you are just storing up more 'Wrath" for yourself.
And the Apostle Paul was the last desciple to be called by Jesus Luke 18:22. I believe he was also present at the time of the baptism of Jesus Christ, because he would have known about John the Baptist and everything he said concerning the Messiah, which could have prompted him, as a Pharisee of pharisees, to seek out validation from him in Luke 18. 1) The rich young ruler's main concern was to "inherit eternal life " vs 18. He judged himself worthy because he believed he had been obeying all the laws. 2) He had been listening to Jesus's teachings and was convinced that he was a man of authority, though, he wasn't ready to accept the fact He could be the Messiah, so he approached Jesus in a condescending manner- as he was a pharisee and they believed themselves to be above everyone else. So, he sucked up to Jesus by calling Him "Good Master ". Jesus saw through him and responded in a way that means He was God, if Paul believed that He was good, and went on to poke holes in his legalistic beliefs- he believed he never committed adultery, but Jesus taught that to just look on a maiden lustfully already constituted a breaking of the law, so was bearing false witness, which they were notorious for, but wouldn't admit to, so he was indirectly stealing from the temple coffers in the name of doing business for God Galatians 1:14; as was not honoring their fathers and mothers in the name of bringing offerings to the temple etc. and finally, told him to get rid of the source of his pride: his wealth, and distribute to the poor, as they usually pretended to do to look good before the people. He wasn't ready to even exchange that to gain eternal life, which Jesus understood (and gave him time before answering his calling vs 22). He began to follow Jesus from then onwards, persecuting Him just to get physical proof on Him as a fraud. I believe he was behind all the questions to get Jesus to break the laws- including paying taxes (Jesus was called the Son of David, David and his house have been tax exempt by King Saul, for slaying Goliath, by this they're negating His relationship with King David, hence, cannot be the Messiah, they even insult Him of being born of fornication, as Mary got pregnant before getting married John 8:41 etc.) 3) I believe he spearheaded the group that deceived Judas to betray Him, and those they bought to shout "crucify him " over and over again until Jesus was crucified on the cross. He really did persecute Jesus and by so doing, get to follow Him as other desciples, learning from His teachings all along, even sneaking behind to witness the last supper to confidently say he received it of the Lord 1 Corinthians 11:23, to make hin an Apostle born out of due time - long after his calling 1 Corinthians 15:8. 3) His anger made him turn his his back on his own life, and began to persecute everyone linked to Jesus, from Stephen up till the time he fell off his high horse- so to speak, and was forced to come to reality of who Jesus Christ really was- The Son if man(David), The Son of God, which he knew all along but his legalistic mind was resisting it: he finally called Jesus "Lord", though subconsciously, but he always knew He was Lord when he heard His voice again Acts 9:4-5. After this, he became so overzealous enough to begin to let everyone know that "Jesus was the Son of God, and the Messiah" vs 20,22. He began to immediately experience persecution himself, which got him to Arabia, where he had ample time and opportunity to review all the proof he had collected while he was persecuting Jesus 2 Timothy 4:13. He could even have been the naked young man, who was used to entrap JesusChriston the night of His arrest. Mark 14:51-52. (That was why he could write with so much understanding of the Lord in all his epistles). 4) Philippians 3 was where he finally came to terms with the fact that all his wealth could not be exchanged for the knowledge of Christ and gaining eternal life- his all life pursuit Luke18:18! This came at a price though - he lost all his fortune, that he wasn't willing to give up at that time: Luke 18:18-30, calling them "dung." But now, forgetting all his past life and pressing towards the prize of the "high calling " of Jesus, as he now sees it! That was why it was easy for the other desciples to extend to him the right hand of fellowship as the Apostle of the gentiles Galatians 2:9. That was also why he could withstand the other desciples when they were preaching the law and circumcision together with the grace of God in Christ Jesus in Acts 15. Immediately after preaching in the synagogue that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, Acts 9:20-22, God sent Barnabas to help him fulfill his calling, and spread the gospel if salvation to both Jews and gentiles, especially the gentiles. The gospel of the salvation of our souls is simply by grace through faith in the sacrificial death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ and the completed work of the cross that no one can add to or remove from by doing good or bad. The Holy Spirit was sent to guide, teach, interpret, and keep until the end, John 14:26. Thus, He quickenes the believers and takes them all up at rapture. Until then, we give ourselves to studying the scriptures to make ourselves approved unto God as workmen that need not be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth-daily! That was the reason why the Apostle loved his Jewish brethren so much that he wouldn't mind being accursed, as long as they can all (the 12 tribes), be saved! Romans 9:3! That was the reason he endures so much beatings and maltreatment from the Jews, who really hated him, but he continued to concern himself with them, even took up collection of money for the Jewish belivers, even though he was sent to the gentiles-39 stripes 5 timed, got shipwrecked, got bitten by a venomous snake, but like the Duracell battery, he still kept going strong till the end! How stinky and painful and full of putrefying sores, his body must have been, yet he kept on going... So he ran and finished his course and ensured that the outcast tribe of Benjamin, finally has a place in the body of Jesus Christ, and will sit with Him on the right hand of the throne of God, in heavenly places! He made and left us all a legacy, so we can all make it. Thus, he is free from the blood of everyone who rejects so great a salvation story!
By his own words, Paul never met Jesus. All his modifications to Jesus's theology were through "visions". All he needed was a hat wherein to put his head while dictating. James and the others were not fans of this Greco Roman dude hijacking their church. And: Paulism is the religion of a human sacrifice of a man who was born of the divine rape of a little girl. God rapes little girl, then kills her son as a LITERAL blood sacrifice to himself. That...is vile.
@@davis.fourohfour - So what if Paul did not get a chance to meet Jesus while He was still alive in the flesh, Paul's teaching's CONFIRM the Words of Jesus and that Jesus visited him in a vision because he taught the EXACT SAME THING JESUS TAUGHT. Don't agree ? BOTH JESUS & PAUL TAUGHT TO OBEY THE 10 COMMANDMENTS : JESUS said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honor thy father and thy mother: and, THOU SHALT LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF." (Matthew 19:18,19) PAUL said, "For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal,Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, THOU SHALT LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF." (Romans 13:9) ******************************************** BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT "ONE GOD" ******************************************** "JESUS answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is ONE LORD:" (Mark 12:29) PAUL said, "and that there is none other GOD but ONE....but to us there is but ONE GOD.."(1st Corinthians 8:4,6) ********************************************* BOTH JESUS & PAUL TAUGHT FORGIVENESS OF SINS THROUGH JESUS' BLOOD ********************************************* JESUS said, "For this is MY BLOOD of the New Testament, which is shed for many FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS" (Matthew 26:28) PAUL said, "in whom we have redemption through HIS BLOOD, THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS, according to the riches of his grace;" (Ephesians 1:7) ******************************************** BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT THAT JESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO THE FATHER ***************************************************************** "JESUS saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: NO MAN COMES UNTO THE FATHER BUT BY ME." (John 14:6) PAUL said, "for THROUGH HIM,(Jesus), we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father." (Ephesians 2:18) ************************************************************* BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT THAT JESUS WAS SINLESS ************************************************************* JESUS said, "Which of you convinces me of SIN? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?" (John 8:46) PAUL said, "For he hath made him to be sin for us, WHO KNEW NO SIN; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." (2nd Corinthians 5:21) ********************** Would you like 100 more scriptures ??
You synopsis would have been worthy of being fleshed out and canonised as the fifth Gospel if only you had written it before the Council of Nicea. Such were the authors writing for the Legend of the Messiah who was baptized by John the Baptist and faced his demon for forty days and nights fasting in the wilderness, and won. The man who became still and knew. And the easy stories about the she-said, he-said deeds that followed. Today, a Netflix script will bring your words to life. Entertained. Hopeful. Sad. Blockbuster. And the audience went home from their bread and circus none the wiser, but knew there were still Superheroes out there to save them from each other; and who would choose them from the masses.
Did paul write Talmud , Sanhedrin 77a. Is it true according to your talmud, your text, if you bound your neighbour and he died of starvation, you are not liable to execution in Judaism.
yea right, because Paul the ex-Pharissees . from the tribe of Benjamin ( unlike Tobia from the 13th Tribe/ Kahzars 😂) studied in the feet of Gamaliel, concerning the Law blameless, wrote thru the inspiration of the Holy Spirit that the Jews was the enemy of the Gospel😂 (Romans 11:28).Nothing new😂
@@asphilosophyusa their bases for denying 2 Peter is because of an assumption of when Jesus would return. They have assumed something the scriptures never said
@bretherenlee1404 there are a lot more reasons to be suspicious than just that. Even the compilers of the Canon doubted its authenticity. My question is, what evidence do you see that it _was_ truly written by Peter other than the fact it was attributed to him by _some_ people in the early church?
Tertius who says that he wrote the letter of Romans and NOT Apostle Paul states that he knew Timothy as a worker who worked with him and (Tertius) states that he also knew Priscilla too and Aquila......
I know I'm just a random guy on the internet, but I think Rabbi Singer _completely_ misunderstands Paul. His error is failing to consider Paul's audience. If you truly want to understand Paul, you need to separate his personal piety from what the early church believed was required of Gentiles. The letter to the Romans is nothing if not a midrash on Jeremiah 31:31-34 and Ezekiel 36:16-36. Paul does not quote his sources in their entirety, but he does quote Ezekiel 36:21 in Romans 2:24. Of course, you should not let my suggestion hang on one verse, but here is Paul in his own words: "in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fully met in us" (Romans 8:4). That is, just as Deuteronomy 30:6, 8 (later taken up by Jeremiah and Ezekiel) predicts an act of God to cause people to fulfill the law from the inside out, so also Paul says this is happening in real time in his day. What Singer finds so offensive (rather, where he gets confused) is his applying to Jews what Paul _and_ the Jerusalem church said of Gentiles: they were not obligated to proselytize: "Yet not even Titus, who was with me, was compelled to be circumcised, even though he was a Greek" (Galatians 2:3). This coheres perfectly with the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15. The debate about Gentiles keeping the law makes _absolutely no sense_ unless it was agreed that Jews were still expected to. But Paul's letters are NOT addressed to Jews, so the antinomian accusation is totally bogus. So to restate it: Paul's issue was with zealots who were telling his Gentile converts that, even though they had already received the Spirit, they needed to be circumcised for it to count. Paul was harsh in rejecting this, and the picture that emerges is not unlike what Singer says, but it's a straw man if you are saying it applies to Jewish believers keeping the law. It would have been helpful if you had asked Singer what he thinks Gentiles need to do to have eternal life. In other settings, he has not said "became 100% card carrying Jews." Ironically, he agrees with Paul way more than he thinks.
If you want to to say Paul audience is the Gentiles and say that is something the person you call Jesus also wanted to convey, isnt from the 4 gospels. Jesus always told his disciples to Not go the way of the gentiles but to the lost sheep of the House of Isreal. So if Jesus never taught that to his disciples but Paul who message is to the Gentiles,something dont fit. Acts try to fix this with the dream they say Peter has about the unclean animals. That contradicts anything Jewish. Acts contradicts Pauls letters about even meeting any disciple of Jesus which he says he didnt meet til 3 years into his ministry. Either Jesus came Only for the Lost Sheep of the Isreal in which he teaches or Paul isnt a true messenger of Jesus.
@@daniellyons4021 You're even more confused than Rabbi Singer. First, if you trust the four gospels, you likely know that most scholars believe Acts was written by the same author as Luke. Whether that is a man named Luke is irrelevant. So your first mistake is imposing a false dichotomy on the text that the author and implied readers would not perceive. Second, the gospels record Jesus sending his disciples on one or two missions during which he instructed them not to go to the nations. It is NEVER stated anywhere that that was permanent. As far as we know, they adhered to that instruction. Third, in Acts 11 Peter interprets the dream described in Acts 10. Peter's interpretation is NOT that the food laws have been abolished but that the vision was a metaphor indicating that the Gentiles have been declared clean, as evidenced by the outpouring of the Spirit. It sounds like you don't think Isaiah 2 is Jewish? How about Isaiah 49? Daniel 7? Genesis 12? There are no contradictions here. Finally, you _could_ be correct about when Paul met the other apostles, but you could also be incorrect. Paul's first visit to Jerusalem is said to take place after sufficient time (ἡμέραι ἱκαναί) had passed to draw the ire of the Jews in Damascus (Acts 9:23). The text is vague about how much time passed between fleeing his enemies in Damascus and coming to Jerusalem. But here I am indulging your inability to focus on the topic at hand, as this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with expectations for Jews and Gentiles.
Both Christianity and Islam have borrowed a lot from Judaism and Old Testament! Jesus had more respect for Christianity Ironically current Christians are completely against Judaism!
Tertius the writer of Romans if there was a person who was named Tertius who had written the book of Romans would have had to have known the people that Apostle Paul had met personally because the writer states that he had already had met them on Paul's trips to those places that Apostle Paul had traveled on to
Paul was one of the most revolutionary thinkers in human history and his influence has absolutely saturated the modern secular world. You dont have to be Christian to believe that. Read Badiou's "St. Paul: The Foundation of Universalism."
I have met plenty of religious believers and leaders that quote their scripture out of context confidently. I dont think they are lying for power, more likely, they are just arrogant and dont consider that they could be wrong about any given topic. How can we say confidently that paul was deliberately lying, rather than just being an arrogant man with theological disagreements with others?
If Psalms 69:25 verse was about Judas Iscariot as the writer of Acts wrote that apostle Peter took and said......did Judas Iscariot have multiple tents that he dwelled on in?
As an Atheist, I would say that Apostle Paul was MUCH BETTER than Moses. Moses sanctioned things such as racism/ethnocentrism, slavery, rape, genocide and many other crimes against humanity. Apostle Paul reformed Judaism towards better morals. Paul's morals were not perfect, but they were significantly better than Moses' morals. I would rather live in a society based on Paul's morality than Moses' morality.
@@francmittelo6731 1 Corinthians 7:17 he says God assigned people to their positions. Galatians 4:23-31 he says how good it is that slaves ares excluded from God’s promise to Abraham. In Philemon 1:9 and :13 he uses slavery as a metaphor for adherence to Jesus.
Paul is 1 reason why I left Christianity. I have had people argue points using quotes from Paul where I was quoting Yeshua. One day looked at it all said to myself the church really has little to do with Yeshua and way more to do with Paul. Paul 100% conman where Yeshua teaches acts of kindness and love toward your fellow man will give you redemption and you will welcomed into Heaven. How Paul says only faith in the death and resurrection of will give you eternal life. Big difference how has this man fooled Christians for 2000 years.
@lylemccomber9460 - That is a really profound post considering the TRUTH that Paul taught EXACTLY what Jesus taught: BOTH JESUS & PAUL TAUGHT TO OBEY THE 10 COMMANDMENTS: JESUS said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honor thy father and thy mother: and, THOU SHALT LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF." (Matthew 19:18,19) PAUL said, "For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, THOU SHALT LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF." (Romans 13:9) ******************************************** BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT "ONE GOD" ******************************************** "JESUS answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is ONE LORD:" (Mark 12:29) PAUL said, "and that there is none other GOD but ONE....but to us there is but ONE GOD.."(1st Corinthians 8:4,6) ********************************************* BOTH JESUS & PAUL TAUGHT FORGIVENESS OF SINS THROUGH JESUS' BLOOD ********************************************* JESUS said, "For this is MY BLOOD of the New Testament, which is shed for many FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS" (Matthew 26:28) PAUL said, "in whom we have redemption through HIS BLOOD, THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS, according to the riches of his grace;" (Ephesians 1:7) ******************************************** BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT THAT JESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO THE FATHER ***************************************************************** "JESUS saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: NO MAN COMES UNTO THE FATHER BUT BY ME." (John 14:6) PAUL said, "for THROUGH HIM,(Jesus), we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father." (Ephesians 2:18) ************************************************************* BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT THAT JESUS WAS SINLESS ************************************************************* JESUS said, "Which of you convinces me of SIN? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?" (John 8:46) PAUL said, "For he hath made him to be sin for us, WHO KNEW NO SIN; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." (2nd Corinthians 5:21) ***************************************************************** Would you like 100 more scriptures ??
If when to go for it. But to be honest I don't really care if you do. I have no regard what so ever for Paul. But how about you write his contradictions. But I wont read it anyway.
@@lylemccomber9460 - Paul NEVER "contradicted" Jesus, if you "think" he did, then "YOU" post the seemingly "contradictions". But you won't, because there are NONE.
@@lylemccomber9460 Paul said that you are NOT JUSTIFIED by the Law, he didn't say not to OBEY IT !! This is what Paul said about the Law. For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal,Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any othe, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law." (Romans 13:8-10) "Know you not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS SHALL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, SHALL INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (1st Corinthians 6:9,10) "Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I TELL YOU BEFORE AS I HAVE ALSO TOLD YOU IN TIME PAST, that THEY WHICH DO SUCH THINGS WILL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (Galatians 5:19-21) ""But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, WE OURSELVES ARE ALSO FOUND SINNERS, is therefore Christ THE MINISTER OF SIN ? GOD FORBID ! .For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself A TRANSGRESSOR." (Galatians 2:17,18) "What shall we say then? SHALL WE CONTINUE IN SIN, , that grace may abound? GOD FORBID !. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?" (Romans 6:1,2) " What shall we say then? IS THE LAW SIN ? GOD FORBID !. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet....Wherefore THE LAW IS HOLY, and THE COMMANDMENT HOLY, AND JUST, AND GOOD." (Romans 7:7,12) **************************************************************************** Jesus CLEARLY says in Matthew 5:17,18 that "HE", "HE". "HE" came to FULFILL THE LAW. "You" have ALREADY BROKEN the Law so "You" CANNOT fulfill it, therefore, the ONLY WAY you could be JUSTIFIED by the Law is to OBEY IT WITHOUT BREAKING IT, Get It ?? Also, you don't seem to understand what Jesus was saying in Matthew 5:20. Jesus is saying that the Pharisee's are NOT going into the Kingdom of Heaven because their "Righteousness" is NOT SUFFICIENT !! That is why Jesus said that YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS MUST "Exceed" theirs in order for YOU to go in. Jesus is saying that it is IMPOSSIBLE for men to enter the Kingdom of Heaven in their "own" obedience or their "own" "work" because they are ALREADY GUILTY OF BREAKING THE LAW. It is Written: "When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, WHO THEN CAN BE SAVED ? Jesus said unto them, WITH MEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE., but with God, all things are possible." (Matthew 19:25,26)
Several decades ago, when my christian faith was wavering, I read The Case For Christ. For me, the clincher was "why would anyone be willing to die for a lie?" and therefore the early christians must have actually encountered the risen Jesus. Yet we see Paul, the guy who might be the strongest advocate of this religion, apparently raking in the shekels, the first apparently leading to the mega-churches of today. And although I agree with the good Rabbi that Acts is fan-fiction, when Paul is hauled into court, no one raises the issue that he is claiming the convicted felon Jesus might have actually escaped execution. "Wanted die or alive" type posters would have been offering a lot more than 30 pieces of silver IF the authorities had any evidence of a post-crucifixion Jesus and Paul would have been tortured to give up the location of Jesus.
Nabatneatan was in Arabia on at that time and if Apostle Paul went to Arabia then i can see why King Aretas IV (the 4th that is) took and tried capturing him because the Nabateans didn't get along well with the Jewish people especially with Herod Antipas
You can't. And where did God grant rabbis the authority to lead his people in the wake of the Temple's destruction? He didn't. Why? Because that authority passed to the Roman Catholic Church and its universal mission, encompassing both Jews and Gentiles, through his divine Son. We've never heard a peep out of God since that time, nor will we, until the Son returns at the End of Days.
@@jimnewlI disagree with both you AND Singer. Paul's letters were addressed to non-Jews, so we shouldn't assume his beliefs about what Jews should believe/do based on what he said gentiles should believe/do. In other places (e.g. Acts 21) we have good evidence that Paul remained personally faithful to the Jewish law throughout his life. The notion that the Church replaced Israel wouldn't take hold within gentile Christianity until a bit later, I'd say starting with Justin Martyr's "Dialogue with Trypho".
This is an important issue: Why's the veracity of Paul's Apostleship coming under attack? Because TRUTH is under all-out attack. By dismissing Paul you're USURPING the *completed Word of God* - not "Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth." As an "awakened" new ager I dissed Paul (once or twice) thinking I knew better, but now I'm BORN AGAIN I see better: I SEE he was full of the same *Spirit* filling me - and that's ALL I need to know about Paul: that he was anointed by the *Holy Spirit.* Paul was appointed by *Jesus Himself* and HE don't make mistakes. Seriously, Paul wrote as he was moved by the Holy Spirit, so to insult him is to insult *God's SPIRIT* which, Jesus says, is tantamount to the *unpardonable sin.* Under the inspiration of the Spirit of God - Paul said, *"Follow me as I follow Christ."* We're not dealing with a man who glorifies himself but someone who the Holy Spirit led to write about his life experience, because GOD is holding him up as the example for us, so HOW DARE anyone say that we shouldn't follow his example. Paul's personality shows in his writings, as all the authors of scripture do. But Paul ain't simply rehearsing something that he sat down and learned and meditated and said "well now this is what I'll write." No, he wrote as he was moved by the HOLY SPIRIT. We have to stress Paul's apostleship for the church age as over and against Christ's Ministry in the Gospels; but people cry, "I'm gonna go with what Jesus said." They're well meaning but NOT THINKING. Everything Jesus said in his earthly ministry - with exception of the last chapters of the gospels after His resurrection - was BEFORE THE CROSS. He hadn't died yet; his blood hadn't been shed and nothing is mooted of that in His preaching..... When you go by what Jesus said in his earthly ministry you're going by that which is BEFORE THE CROSS. Rightly Divide the Word of Truth! When you get to the Apostle Paul he makes it so plain that everything he writes he receives from the Lord IN GLORY. It's still the Words of Jesus only now it's in that time that's most appropriate: post Resurrection. He's FINISHED the Work of the Cross. We have to adhere to the writings of Paul because that's where the MEAT of our doctrine stands.
So by your logic, anyone who disagrees or "attacks" you is making an unpardonable sin, because you are moved by the holy spirit? That's an easy way to shut down conversation, huh?
Christianity is Edom's salvation. Meaning, all kingdoms come to an end. You people had your time of rulership and you and your man-god brought all the nations down.
Exactly correct in recognizing the separate paths. There is a gospel of John the Baptist's 'repent, for the kingdom of heaven is near' that Jesus had continued, and his early disciples continued, where the truth healed people by release. Then there is the abuse of Jesus's dead body, and the delusion by faith that healed people by their oath of bondage and as long as they are being kept upset by 'never there yet'. Looking away from the car headlights, or remaining fixated in the car headlights for a hope of peace. There are many more Preferential headlights to jump into.
I have a lot of sympathy for the Hellenistic pagan world. Reading the Emperor Julian's "Against the Galileans" it is clear that he thinks that the Christians have taken the worst of Hellenism and the worst of Judaism to fabricate their religion. Julian thought the Jews far exceeded the Christians in wisdom, and indeed wanted to help rebuild the Jewish Temple. It was a tragedy that he died too soon.
The writer of Acts wrote it all wrong was all. Same thing with the book of Luke. No watchtower is mentioned on in the book of Luke about the ("parable of the Tenants.") And the, ("mulberry tree too being planted on in the sea underneath water.") Luke 17:6 verse
This is what Tovia Singer is "hiding" from you because YOU REFUSE to read the NT for YOURSELF !! Paul said this about the LAW. "For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law." (Romans 13:8-10) "Know you not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS SHALL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, SHALL INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (1st Corinthians 6:9,10) "Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I TELL YOU BEFORE AS I HAVE ALSO TOLD YOU IN TIME PAST, that THEY WHICH DO SUCH THINGS WILL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (Galatians 5:19-21) ""But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, WE OURSELVES ARE ALSO FOUND SINNERS, is therefore Christ THE MINISTER OF SIN ? GOD FORBID ! .For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself A TRANSGRESSOR." (Galatians 2:17,18) "What shall we say then? SHALL WE CONTINUE IN SIN, , that grace may abound? GOD FORBID !. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?" (Romans 6:1,2) " What shall we say then? IS THE LAW SIN ? GOD FORBID !. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet....Wherefore THE LAW IS HOLY, and THE COMMANDMENT HOLY, AND JUST, AND GOOD." (Romans 7:7,12) Don't you feel a little "foolish" now ?? Don't be "spiritually" LAZY and read the New Testament FOR YOURSELF !!
Rabbi, your clarifications of the actual meanings of Old Test. lit. are very informative. Question: In your view, was Paul actually a Pharisee? I doubt it.
No he proved in other videos that Paul could not have been a pharasee because Paul didn't speak hebrew at all, he quoted false translations from the greek version.
@@ts8960which video? I know for sure Colossians exhibits a very working knowledge of Hebrew, which isn't attributed to Paul by most. I'm pretty sure Romans does too which everybody considers Pauline
Christians, like many Jews at the time, absolutely _didn't care_ what the writers of OT scripture really meant. They were puzzling out secret messages concealed in scripture that would meet their needs. So complaints about them getting scripture wrong wholly miss the point.
@jansteinvonsquidmeirsteen2256 you have been lied to. The sea scrolls are much more aligned with the masoretic than it is the corrupt and completely debotched "septuigant" (which was only of 5 books of moses and we dont have the original septuigant) . You are insane btw for suggesting that every hebrew bible out there is corrupt, more than a greek translation, wow. That is inline with the muslim perspective which undermines ur religion as well.
I got a question that is confusing if you read in Matthew Judas who betrayed Jesus than realize what he done he went back threw the silver he got back and went hang himself .. Now if you read in Acts it says Judas was walking through the land he bought with the silver he got from what he did than fell headlong and his intestines burst out and died I don’t get it how can the same guy die twice in two different ways .. now this is confusing and doesn’t God say I’m not a God of confusion so anyone reading these two verses will be like wait this is confusing did he hang himself or did his intestines Burst out while walking through his land he bought didn’t he throw back the silver It says that In Matthew did he secretly go back get the silver back not hang himself and buy land 🤷🏼🤷🏼🤷🏼🤷🏼
You need to read Paul as a Jew. He's not saying Jews can't keep the Torah. He claims to be perfect 'as to the law'. Paul is addressing pagan converts. 'wretched man that I am... " &c is Paul identifying with formerly idolotrous pagans. The question for Paul (& other first century Jews) was how goys would be admitted to the kingdom? As proselyte Jews, or as members of the Nations? If God is one, He is the God of the Nations too. To require the Gentiles to convert would deny the oneness of God. Good grief man, Paul was a Jew not a Christian. There was no such thing as a Christian in Paul's time. You might not agree with him, but disowning him is small minded and petty. Guess you'd need to start another synagogue if he showed up? If you keep on being so vitriolic you'll give yourself an ulcer. Do you feel threatened by messianic Judaism?
Paul isn't saying Christians don't have to keep the Torah or shouldn't. Paul EXPECTS every believer to be torah observant. Paul understands the one God doesn't have different standards for the two groups. This is hammered throughout Romans from start to finish. Christians keep the law. So does Galatians.
@@vikingdemonpr he's fixed it. Jacob is strange, I wrote that to help. He changes it and doesn't acknowledge my comment and it just makes my comment look deranged. Cheers man. :(
But when the fulness of the time was come, Elohiym sent forth his Son, who was born of a woman, and subject to the Law, Galatiym (Galatians) 4:4 I am YAHUSHA
Christians view ancient religious Israel in a broken state, in order to portray Jesus more comfortably as a Messia. But really what happend was that Judaism just went through a spiritual development, away from a fundamentalistic view. This was also prophesiede by Jeremiah. I dont want to say that orthodox Judaism is wrong, because those were the men protecting scripture. And they will do that for ever, because the covenant God made with Israel is enternal. When Moses received the commandments on Mount Sinai, God dictated his words with a sword. And on that sword the words ''You maybe next'' were engraved. The reason why God decided to show himself like that, is because we still live in a pagan world. It doesnt matter if Christians desperately and hypocritically suddenly became Gentiles, and certainly not if we merge with technology and become robots.
BROTHER BERMAN AND RABBI SINGER, I SINCERELY APPRECIATE YOUR HAVING READ THE NEW COVENANT, AS MUCH AS WE ALSO READ YOUR OLD COVENANT (TANAKH). I WOULD LIKE YOU TO BE AWARE THAT IN PAUL THE RISEN CHRIST WAS DIRECTLY SPEAKING THROUGH A MAN. A LITTLE SIMILAR TO HOW MOSES WAS YOWEH'S SPOKESPERSON. SO IT IS A MATTER OF DIVINE REVELATION, AS EVEN PETER WROTE IN HIS LETTER AGAINST THOSE MISCONSTRUING PAUL'S WISDOM. LET US BEAR IN MIND THAT PAUL WAS A PHARISEE, THUS ESSENTIALLY A RABBI, BUT ALSO A JEW DESPERATE TO SHOW FELLOW JEWS THAT THERE IS A MORE REAL WAY OF SALVATION THAN THE LAW. HENCE, WHILE IT IS UNDERSTANDABLE THAT SINCERE JEWS HAVE DISDAIN FOR PAUL OVERTURNING THEIR RELIGION AT YESHUA'S (JEHOVAH SAVING) COMMAND, THEY SHOULD ADMIT THAT HE IS RIGHT AND COMPELLED DIVINELY. IT WAS ALSO HIM THAT WROTE THE LETTER TO HEBREWS, SO AS TO CLARIFY, AS A PHARISEE, WHY THE GOSPEL LIBERATES THE SINCERE FROM THE GUILT OF A NEAR-IMPOSSIBLE TORAH.
Very interesting titles, but the host is very dry, and his monetizing ads are chaotic, intrusive ( mid thought interruptions ) and annoying scam ads ( free government food cards and other complete false baiting ).
He wanted people to believe him that he was prophet.He enjoyed being a rival to the true prophet.He failed to realize that he was decieved by satan in starting his own religion based on the religion of Jesus.His activity went full steam with disappearance of Jesus.Teaching new doctrine of his invention he noticed his doctrine gained popularity with the sin wipe off by just believing him.He was a liar .He admitted he was but his doctrine popularity was still growing nevertheless.In modern time church attendance reduced so popularity is reduced.
I think Singer should reveal to people of the world. That he the singer should explain why Paul a jew change to join Christ .What is the reason earlier he was a jew.Paul was aware of Torah n what he found in Torah was wrong. why was he thrown from a horse by the light .
Do you all really understand the power of God?..Who he is?...Do you really believe God would allow 2/3's of the New Testament in the KJV to be written by Paul if it was false? Jesus spoke in Matthew 12:24-26 (24) "But when the Pharisee's heard about the miracle, they aid, "No wonder he can cast out demons. He gets hi power from Satan, the prince of demons." (25) Jesus knew their thoughts and replied, "Any kingdom divided by civil war is doomed. A town or family splintered by feuding will fall apart. {26) And if Satan is casting out Satan, he is divided and fighting against himself. His own kingdom will not survive." Do you really believe God would fight against himself?
He called Christianity a " weird sect".If Judaism was called a " weird sect", the Jewish anti defamation League would be all over it as antisemitism. Why escalate religious intolerance at this time? Superstitious religious people of one Faith attacking other religions will only inflame religious intolerance. Live and let live.
yet It’s the “Christian” USA that basically keeping all the 23 Arab counties at bay in the protection of Israel where this Rabbi lives. he needs to appreciate what Christians do to protect israel and give glory to Jesus Christ
Let me jump on this thought real quick. I've been thinking about this too but disagree on the point that Barabbas got released. Yes, Jesus Barabbas could be the historical Jesus. He fits the model of a messianic rebel. The thing is that the Gospel writers split Jesus into two: the messianic rebel who is Barabbas and the Pauline, peaceful, spiritual messiah Jesus. The point that the Gospel writers might have wanted to do is, in the context of the post war, that the Jews chose to side with the rebels (Barabbas) and rejected the peaceful messiah (Jesus). But I do think the historical Jesus was crucified by the Romans.
@@vikingdemonpr You bring up an interesting point. I have wondered why would the gospel writers put that passage in there. Maybe it was their tongue in cheek way of letting the reader know that what they were writing down was a bunch of shit. I think from a historical perspective, there is no way in hell that the Roman government would release a convicted murderer. It is a very interesting passage. But we do agree that Jesus might have been executed, but he was not crucified. My take is that no one was ever crucified. It was something that was made up.
@@perfectblindguy well crucifixion was the method of executing rebels and traitors to the Empire. During the war(66-73) Josephus reports that there were so many crucifixions that they ran out of trees.
@@perfectblindguyHow common was crucifixion in Jerusalem? The practice became especially popular in the Roman-occupied Holy Land. In 4 B.C., the Roman general Varus crucified 2,000 Jews, and there were mass crucifixions during the first century A.D., according to the Roman-Jewish historian Josephus.
@@vikingdemonpr well, maybe but as far as archeology is concerned, nothing has been found to support crucifixion, except for one ankle bone with a nail in it. And I am not sure if that supported crucifixion or not. As far as Jesus is concerned, some of the earlier manuscripts say that it was a pole and not a T. Thusly, the Roman soldiers rammed a spear up his ass and that is how Jesus died, if he was executed. That's my two cents.
What was wrong with the preaching of John the Baptist? Why did the religious Jews reject him? Simply! They would not make public their secret sins! They were hypocrites at heart! Just as the Rabbi today nothing has changed. Men will not Repent
Jesus exposed Yahweh in the New Testament. "You have heard it said.....but I say" He even said a good father will not give you a serpent which is exactly what Yahweh the psycho god did in the OT. Jesus' Father was not Yahweh!
@@garlandjones7709 Well, given Marcion is credited with having his fingers in the canonization process, maybe things are not quite what you've presumed.
I have often seen Paul as being like Joseph Smith, but I’ve never heard a scholar say so. I’m blown away.
Singer is a polemicist against Christianity, so there's that. Nevertheless, history is littered with men who set themselves up as starters of cults, some are just more successful than others.
Everybody starting a religion is like Joseph Smith. The people who made up Genesis in 3rd-century BC, in furtherance of their theocratic revolutionary dictatorship, were _also_ like Joseph Smith.
LOL 😂 at both of you!!!
He's no one special
There are other scholars that have said as much.
Rabbi Singer has a lot of great information to share and I do enjoy hearing what he has to say in most instances; however he also has a gift for avoiding giving a direct answer to uncomfortable questions.
In this particular interview he does this on two separate occasions. In one example he avoids addressing the super chat question regarding the dishonesty around Isaac's blessing. He literally avoids any language about dishonesty or trickery despite this is the exact language found in the text and Singer goes on a tangent about the role Jewish women play in the home.
Otherwise his take on Paul is very interesting and probably fairly accurate if we accept the position of scholars regarding dating and authenticity of certain letters etc. Jacob is bringing light to more modern ideas that include multiple authors and push the dates of the letters into the second century, which really changes the game quite a bit.
Rabbi Singer doesn't know what he is talking about. He is outraged by the conversion of many Jews to christianity and this has affected his mental ability
I'm not going to comment on Tovia on a personal level. I spent years doing that and no need rehashing. I gave you a like.
In response to the video and the comment, one thing Tovia is consistently wrongwith, as is the majority of Christianity, is Paul's stance on the Torah. Christians however have a crutch to lean on with ignorance. Tovia doesn't. When you come at Paul with a Jewish perspective, which Tovia has, it's quite easy to see his arguments and how to read them.
The problem is that instead of delivering the bible complete, in one piece, supposedly this all-knowing god dribbles it out, bit by bit, over the centuries by various spokespeople who self-affirm they are speaking on behalf of the big guy. So that one's prophet is another one's blasphemer, and jointly all of them are truly the authors of confusion.
God never wrote anything down. He didn:t "deliver" the Bible like an author delivers his latest novel or instruction manual. God works in and through history, through the actual lives of men. You absolute genius.
@@jimnewl
When was Edom 💁🏼👈 tasked as the ones to bring "God" to the world?
And what "God" is that?
@@jimnewl If Mental gymnastics was a sport in the Olympics, you people would win gold every year
exactly. Religious people dont know what they are talking about
"...Paul was the great Coryphaeus, and first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus. These palpable interpolations and falsifications of his doctrines led me to try to sift them apart."
An extract from a letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Short, April 13 1820
Paul was such a con man. I just wrote a book: "Romans Proves Paul Lied". A review of all of Romans, with comments exposing his lies, followed by the foundation of Matthew from the Hebrew translation, followed by the 3000 year old Covenant that proves Jesus was restoring the Covenant - retelling the Covenant Standards that were altered 1000 years before him - not nailing them to a cross. Modern proof Jesus was directly inspired by Elohim.
You’re right about that! Most Christian’s don’t read the Bible. 😂
Most Jews don't either. Probably on a larger scale.
@@garlandjones7709much much larger scale.
Rabbi keeping it 100! Paul and his salvation-theology-cult basically ruined the first 20 years of my life. 99.9% of Christians don't practice Christianity...they practice Paulanity. Great interview!
True. Jesus told the rich young ruler in order to have eternal life, he must sell everything he has and give it to the poor. I was a Christian for 20 years, and I never heard anyone doing that. Hell, they always prayed for more......
@@perfectblindguy that young teacher was Paul aka hillel
@@perfectblindguy Your a LIAR, Jesus did NOT say that. Here is the portion of scripture that you obviously have NEVER READ IN YOUR LIFE !! Jesus said, " but if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS. He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet? Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me." (Matthew 19:17-21)
The young ruler "claimed" that he was "perfect" in OBEYING the 10 Commandments, but did not realize that HIS POSSESSIONS WERE HIS IDOLS that he was unable to part with, WHICH IS BREAKING THE 1ST COMMANDMENT, "Thou shalt have NO OTHER GODS BEFORE ME".
So get your facts straight !!
I wouldn't say he's keeping it 100, but he is being real about Paul. I say this as someone who follows Matthew's Jesus (ie Mattew & Mark).
To the other commenter, concerning the identity of the rich young ruler, I've often wondered that same thing. But you state it so definitively. Where are you deriving such confidence? Genuine question
@@AnHebrewChild Paul is Zacherias barachai the Blessed benedictus who is also the Camillus (lackey, abdes, acolyte, water-carrier) who can not match up with the man in charge, rather go through the eye of the needle. In other words Drusus germanicus as a failed rightfull pretender (James the Just) was unable to challenge Tiberius Princeps , He was slain between the altar and the temple, hench he could not enter the highest office.
The book of Acts was written to justify Saul / Paul of Tarsus and his gospel. Saul / Paul of Tarsus brought in the gospel according to Balaam. It is unbelievable the mountain that a protestant will climb to justify Saul/ Paul of Tarsus. I'm amassed when a protestant will say Jesus the Christ said and then quote Saul/ Paul of Tarsus.
@SamKidder-yd2qo - Why are you "amassed" ?? Could it be that YOU have also NEVER read the NT for yourself, so therefore you do NOT "know" that Jesus and Paul taught the VERY SAME THING ?? Pitiful......
🎯 Key points for quick navigation:
00:01 *🎙 Introduction and Topic Overview*
- Introduction of the live stream and the guest, Rabbi Tovia Singer,
- Overview of the discussion topic: Paul the Apostle being potentially a liar and a conman.
01:11 *📜 Paul's Misrepresentation of the Torah*
- Paul alters the Hebrew Bible to fit his agenda,
- Opposes ritual commandments, promotes faith alone for salvation,
- Claims non-Jews are one with Jews in Christ, altering scriptures to support this.
04:19 *🔎 Character and Writings of Paul*
- Paul as a highly disagreeable person based on his letters,
- Conflict with fellow Christians and leaders of the Jerusalem Church,
- View of himself as the foremost apostle, criticizing others like Peter.
08:21 *🚪 Breakaway Sect and Paul's Influence*
- Comparison of early Christianity to a breakaway sect like Mormonism to Protestant Christianity,
- Paul likened to Joseph Smith, creating significant differences in theology,
- Emphasis on Paul's authoritative and influential role in Christianity.
12:10 *🏛 Paul's Personal Ambition and Behavior*
- Paul's desire for power and authority,
- Claims direct revelation from Jesus Christ to assert dominance,
- His boasting about his background and persecution of Christians.
17:00 *🛡 Paul's Credentials and Self-Justification*
- Discussion of Paul's claims about his credentials and background,
- His self-justification in his letters, presenting himself as credible and authoritative,
- His exaggeration of his persecution of Christians.
20:34 *📚 Paul's Epistles and Influence on Canon*
- The style and temperament of Paul's writings,
- His influence on other letters attributed to him,
- The central role of Paul's epistles in the Christian Bible and his assertive nature.
26:26 *🔄 Paul's Adaptability and Deception*
- Paul justifies using different approaches to convert Jews and Gentiles.
- The ends justify the means for Paul, using pretense and boastfulness to bring people to Christianity.
- Influences on modern groups like Jews for Jesus and the Messianic movement.
29:06 *👎 Paul's Character and Misconduct*
- Paul is portrayed as an undesirable person to associate with.
- Instances of Paul's rudeness and confrontation with Jewish authorities.
- Comparison of Paul’s portrayal to Jesus' in the Gospels, focusing on suffering and persecution.
32:06 *🚨 Missionary Tactics and Modern Impacts*
- Missionaries in Israel emulate Paul's tactics of provoking and recording confrontations.
- Videos depicting these confrontations are used to claim persecution.
- Paul’s influence on these tactics is highlighted, suggesting a continuity from his methods.
35:06 *📜 Authenticity of Acts and Paul’s Persecution*
- Doubts about the historical accuracy of Paul’s persecution narratives in Acts.
- Similarities between the stories of Paul in Acts and Jesus in the Gospels.
- The use of these stories to portray Paul as suffering unfairly for his faith.
38:04 *🤝 Divergence in Christology: Paul vs. Luke*
- Differences in how Paul and the author of Luke/Acts view Jesus' death and its significance.
- Paul’s view of Jesus' death as a ransom vs. Luke’s emphasis on repentance.
- Contrasts in the portrayal of Jesus' resurrection body between Paul and Luke.
41:11 *💡 Interpretation of Jesus' Death and Repentance*
- Luke’s perspective that Jesus' death prompts repentance, not as a ransom for sins.
- Importance of repentance in Luke’s theology, contrasting with Paul’s substitutionary atonement.
- Examples from Acts demonstrating this theological difference.
44:03 *🗣 Misrepresentation of the Law in Galatians*
- Paul’s claim that the law was given by angels, not directly by God.
- This claim undermines the authority of the Torah, aligning with Paul’s argument in Galatians 3.
- Examination of Paul's theological motives and the implications of his arguments.
47:18 *📖 Faith vs. Law: Misquoting Habakkuk*
- Paul’s misuse of Habakkuk 2:4 to argue against the necessity of following the law.
- Explanation of the original context of Habakkuk, focusing on faith in the end times.
- Paul's reinterpretation of "faith" to support his antinomian stance.
52:13 *🐂 Paul's Misinterpretation of Animal Welfare Law*
- Paul misapplies the law about not muzzling an ox to support missionaries financially.
- The original context in Deuteronomy 25:4 is about animal welfare, not human support.
- Rabbi Tovia Singer criticizes this as a deliberate misuse to serve Paul's agenda.
55:41 *📚 Transition to RUclips and Electronic Media*
- Rabbi Singer explains his shift from writing books to creating RUclips content.
- Electronic media allows immediate and wide-reaching communication.
- This medium is seen as more effective in countering missionary efforts.
59:12 *📖 Paul's Identity and Greek Influence*
- Debate on whether Paul was Jewish or a Hellenized Jew.
- Paul’s teachings, such as spiritual resurrection, align more with Greek thought.
- Contrasts between Jewish physical resurrection beliefs and Greek spiritual resurrection.
01:03:20 *⚔ Gospel Accounts and Resurrection Debate*
- Differences in gospel accounts of Jesus' resurrection reflect apologetic efforts.
- Paul’s spiritual resurrection concept vs. gospel accounts of physical resurrection.
- Discrepancies in gospel narratives aim to address early Christian theological conflicts.
01:07:45 *📜 Paul as a Liar and Conman*
- Rabbi Singer likens Paul to modern conmen like Joseph Smith.
- Paul's actions and writings are seen as self-serving rather than divinely inspired.
- Contrasts Paul's confrontational stance with Peter against the harmonious portrayal in the Gospels.
01:12:33 *👩👦 Matriarchal Insight in the Torah*
- Discussion on the role of women in recognizing spiritual truths in the Torah.
- Examples include Rebecca’s understanding of Jacob’s destiny over Esau.
- The theme of women having spiritual insight where men do not.
01:16:12 *🌍 Paul's Ministry and Target Audience*
- Paul primarily focused on converting Gentiles rather than Jews.
- Gentiles were more receptive to Paul’s reinterpretations of Jewish scripture.
- Paul's failures in certain regions are noted, but his strategy was to target those who lacked direct access to Jewish texts.
01:18:43 *📜 Misinterpretation of Isaiah 7:14*
- Isaiah 7:14 is not about a miraculous virgin birth,
- The Hebrew word for virgin (betulah) does not appear in Isaiah 7,
- The names of Isaiah's children are symbolic of Judah's deliverance.
01:23:14 *📚 Paul and Jewish Law*
- Paul's stance is completely opposed to keeping the law,
- He advocates against observing Jewish commandments in favor of faith in Christ,
- Paul and the gospel writers are influenced by Greek culture and theater.
01:26:14 *🔍 Paul's Alleged Scriptural Basis*
- Discussion on whether Joel 3:6 relates to Paul's ministry,
- Joel 3 in Hebrew Bible focuses on Jewish restoration,
- No clear connection to Paul's mission.
01:27:40 *✡ Suffering and Transformation in Judaism*
- Jewish concept of suffering leading to repentance and transformation,
- Historical and contemporary events can profoundly change people,
- Jewish literature supports the idea that suffering can lead to spiritual growth.
01:34:05 *🕊 Misuse of Jewish Texts by Missionaries*
- Missionaries exploit rabbinic literature to support Christian doctrines,
- There is a contradiction as they claim not to believe in these texts,
- The absence of direct support for Christian doctrines in the Hebrew Bible leads to these manipulations.
01:36:49 *✍ Paul's Misrepresentation of the Torah*
- Paul frequently misquotes the Hebrew Bible to fit a Christian narrative,
- Example from 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 where he cites non-existent scripture,
- Mistranslations and fabrications are common in Paul's writings.
Made with HARPA AI
```
@DontBeCringe - Thanks for the "index" of this video !!
Too bad the topics and subjects that Singer talks about are pure 100% BS !!
I love Tovia Singer because he just tells it like it is. I think Paul is a liar too
@Sijo2 - This is what Tovia Singer is "hiding" from you because YOU REFUSE to read the NT for YOURSELF !! Paul said this about the LAW. "For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law." (Romans 13:8-10)
"Know you not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS SHALL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, SHALL INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (1st Corinthians 6:9,10)
"Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I TELL YOU BEFORE AS I HAVE ALSO TOLD YOU IN TIME PAST, that THEY WHICH DO SUCH THINGS WILL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (Galatians 5:19-21)
""But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, WE OURSELVES ARE ALSO FOUND SINNERS, is therefore Christ THE MINISTER OF SIN ? GOD FORBID ! .For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself A TRANSGRESSOR." (Galatians 2:17,18)
"What shall we say then? SHALL WE CONTINUE IN SIN, , that grace may abound? GOD FORBID !. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?" (Romans 6:1,2)
" What shall we say then? IS THE LAW SIN ? GOD FORBID !.
Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet....Wherefore THE LAW IS HOLY, and THE COMMANDMENT HOLY, AND JUST, AND GOOD." (Romans 7:7,12)
Don't you feel a little "foolish" now ??
Don't be "spiritually" LAZY and read the New Testament FOR YOURSELF !!
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms
Jesus is Edom's salvation. To keep the confusion going.
@@allwillberevealed777 - "You" are the reason for your own "confusion", therefore, as "you" keep going, your "confusion" keeps going....
Interesting discussion, thank you both.
Wouldn’t have guessed Paul could be such a touchy subject for the comments, haha.
The red letter words will change your life. Don't be distracted by church doctrines and/or the arguments against church doctrines. Go directly to the red letter words and read them for yourself.
Thank you, Rabbi, for opening my eyes wider to what I already knew about Paul
@sebolddaniel - Allow me to open your eyes a little wider....This is what Paul said about the LAW. "For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law." (Romans 13:8-10)
"Know you not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS SHALL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, SHALL INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (1st Corinthians 6:9,10)
"Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I TELL YOU BEFORE AS I HAVE ALSO TOLD YOU IN TIME PAST, that THEY WHICH DO SUCH THINGS WILL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (Galatians 5:19-21)
""But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, WE OURSELVES ARE ALSO FOUND SINNERS, is therefore Christ THE MINISTER OF SIN ? GOD FORBID ! .For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself A TRANSGRESSOR." (Galatians 2:17,18)
"What shall we say then? SHALL WE CONTINUE IN SIN, , that grace may abound? GOD FORBID !. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?" (Romans 6:1,2)
" What shall we say then? IS THE LAW SIN ? GOD FORBID !.
Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet....Wherefore THE LAW IS HOLY, and THE COMMANDMENT HOLY, AND JUST, AND GOOD." (Romans 7:7,12)
Don't you feel a little "foolish" now ??
Don't be "spiritually" LAZY and read the New Testament FOR YOURSELF !!
As someone who grew up Christian but no longer believes in it it's good to hear a Jewish take on the religion.
@sirlordcomic - I know that you probably do not understand this, but there is no such thing as "growing up Christian", although I understand completely what you "mean". A biblical "Christian" is someone who has received a "Revelation" from God that Jesus is the Christ, (Matthew 16:17) (John 6:44,45). If you read the parable of the "Sower Sows the Word", Jesus REVEALS EXACTLY what happened to you and why you don't believe and why you left His Words. You can find the parable in Matthew 13, Mark 4, & Luke 8.
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms The Bible does a wonderful job of reminding us that FAITH is the backbone of whether we will be 'redeemed' and offers all kinds of rational as to why we should believe these mythological writings as 'true'. Amazing Fear vs Reward marketing. Same with Islam. Ancient cult writers knew what they were doing to create followers by lying with convincing flair
@@travisjazzbo3490 If you ever read the New Testament for YOURSELF and actually "knew" the "biblical" definition of "FAITH", you would immediately "delete" your clueless post above. See, you are like most "Christians" who believe that FAITH is "blindly" believing something that you have no "evidence" for, which could not be further from the TRUTH.
Hebrews 11 reveals the TRUTH about FAITH, which involves GOD "speaking" or "revealing" something to you IN REALITY, just like Enoch, Noah, Abraham, and ALL TRUE Christians have experienced.
Your "opinions" & "assumptions" are NOT TRUTH.
ON;LY GOD REVEALS TRUTH, therefore, "You" are in DARKNESS.
19:20 Jews who worked with the Roman Empire, of which there were many in significant positions of power, did in fact go around and stone Christians. When Jesus was causing an insurrection, Jews who worked for Rome, like the Herodians, verifiably killed Christians.
that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Paul called it his gospel because he invented it.
@zachio69 - It seems that you are yet ANOTHER who has NOT read the New Testament for YOURSELF and have "chosen" to believe LIES from your "false rabbi". So let me do your "homework" for you and see if you STILL will choose to remain "willfully ignorant"...BOTH JESUS & PAUL TAUGHT SALVATION IS NOT "Mans" Work, BUT 100% GOD'S WORK : JESUS said, "It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, WHO THEN CAN BE SAVED ? But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, ...
WITH MEN THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE; but WITH GOD ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE." (Matthew 19:24-26)
PAUL said, " For BY GRACE are you SAVED THROUGH FAITH; and that NOT OF YOURSELVES: It is the GIFT OF GOD: NOT OF WORKS, lest any man should boast." (Ephesians 2:8,9)
BOTH JESUS & PAUL TAUGHT TO OBEY THE 10 COMMANDMENTS
****************************************************
JESUS said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honor thy father and thy mother: and, THOU SHALT LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF." (Matthew 19:18,19)
PAUL said, "For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, THOU SHALT LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF."(Romans 13:9)
********************************************
BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT "ONE GOD"
********************************************
"JESUS answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel;
The Lord our God is ONE LORD:" (Mark 12:29)
PAUL said, "and that there is none other GOD but ONE....but to us there is but
ONE GOD.."(1st Corinthians 8:4,6)
*********************************************
BOTH JESUS & PAUL TAUGHT FORGIVENESS
OF SINS THROUGH JESUS' BLOOD
*********************************************
JESUS said, "For this is MY BLOOD of the New Testament, which is shed for many FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS" (Matthew 26:28)
PAUL said, "in whom we have redemption through HIS BLOOD, THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS, according to the riches of his grace;" (Ephesians 1:7)
********************************************
BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT THAT
JESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO THE FATHER
*****************************************************************
"JESUS saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life:
NO MAN COMES UNTO THE FATHER BUT BY ME." (John 14:6)
PAUL said, "for THROUGH HIM,(Jesus), we both have access
by one Spirit unto the Father." (Ephesians 2:18)
*************************************************************
BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT THAT JESUS WAS SINLESS
*************************************************************
JESUS said, "Which of you convinces me of SIN?
And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?" (John 8:46)
PAUL said, "For he hath made him to be sin for us, WHO KNEW NO SIN;
that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." (2nd Corinthians 5:21)
**********************
Would you like 100 more scriptures ??
"A Joseph Smith kind of guy" thank you thank you thank you
Deuteronomy 30: Moses says the most important thing to follow the Law. It is not too hard, but "close to you, in your mouth and heart to do it"
Romans 10 (quoting Deuteronomy 30): Following the Law is bad. It's too hard and only faith matters.
At 45:56 in the video Rabbi Tovia Singer mentions Acts 7 where the writer of Acts writes it wrong about the Patriarch's more than that the writer wrote that Stephen (supposedly) said about ("Abraham that Abraham bought from the sons of Hamor,") the field which Jacob took and bought from the sons of Hamor
Interesting. And the stories about Moses are not a lie and a con? Pot/kettle.
Same thing with Acts 1:20 verse the writer gets Psalms 69:25 wrong about how the verse on in Psalms 69:25 was written about 'May (their) place be deserted let there be no one to dwell in (their) tents.'
RABBI Tovia Singer, vanquisher of the ROMAN EMPIRE 🌬️
Please try to fix the audio.
Paul was a liar. Maybe he had contacts with the Roman government. At least he was into power and claimed to had a vision of Jesus but that probably only happened in his dreams. Moses never existed.
@leonkrajenbrink1873 - I love it when "clueless reprobates" make "absolute" statements like "Paul was a Liar & Moses never existed". Jesus said it best, "I thank you, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because YOU HAVE HID THESE THINGS FROM THE WISE & PRUDENT, and has revealed them unto babes." (Matthew 11:25)
As a Christian myself, I can say that a tremendous amount of Christian disagreement would vanish away if you removed the writings of Paul. Especially Romans ch.9. Talk about a treasure chest of disagreement and confusion! Also, the whole, no women pastors or teachers, and women aren't even allowed to speak in church? This all comes from Paul and no one else? The Bible says everything must be established by 2 or 3 witnesses, yet we have major Christian doctrines and disagreements based on the testimony of a single man. I just have a very real problem with that.
The problem is, there are only a select few of Paul’s epistles which are agreed upon by scholars as being authentic and actually written by Paul. The first and second letter to the Timothy, which is known as the Pastoral epistles (if I’m correct) as it is so called was one of the contested letters that were not included. I do find it crazy how we just accept things because someone tells us. We should always test everything and everybody. I believe that was one of things the congregation at Ephesus was praised for by Jesus as they tested those who claimed to be apostles. I am not saying Paul is a false apostle either. I don’t know. I sometimes wonder if there were letters written in Paul’s name as it was common during that time of pseudo-writers with agendas and Paul did warn about in some of his letters to be aware that there were some who were trying to do this and using his name (and hence authority) to introduce their own doctrines so to speak.
A tremendous amount of disagreements would vanish if people took peters warning that Paul was hard to understand, and also didn't use English chapter breaks. Romans has to be read in blocks usually covering a few chapters at a time with no stop. Romans 9 is no exception.
@@shayalynn that's a great point about people putting words in Paul's mouth and claiming to be him.
@@shayalynn At least you are being honest when you say that "you don't 'know' that Paul is a false Apostle", (which he is definitely NOT). The problem is, "scholars" CANNOT "impart" TRUTH, ONLY GOD CAN, so HOW are you going to "test everything and everybody" ??Y You actually need the "Witness of God Himself" in order to determine if Paul's letters are "legit", which is EXACTLY what God will give you when you receive His Word into the "Good Ground" of your heart, (Luke 8:15), and receive the "Spiritual Birth", (John 3:3-5) (John 1:12,13) (1st Peter 1:23) (James 1:18).
@robbyclark6915 - What ?? How can you make a statement like that and call yourself a "Christian" ?? How many times have you read the New Testament, "once" ?? What is wrong with Romans Chapter 9 ?? If I were you, I would "Examine yourself, whether you be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates? " (2nd Corinthians 13:5)
Philippians 1:18 But what does it matter? The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached. And because of this I rejoice.
This is why it matters, A lie is a lie, and it matters to people who follow God! It is that simple!
Glory be to God, alone! In this I rejoice! God Bless!
Roman garbage.
@charleslitherbury8600 - You are absolutely "clueless" !! If you are "sincerely" preaching the Gospel OR NOT "sincerely" preaching the Gospel, the Truth of the Gospel is STILL being preached. You obviously do not know the difference between a "false motive" and a "Lie"....google it and learn something today !!
I'm sorry I missed this live, Jacob.
🙏🎗🤍🇮🇱💙 More of Rabbi Singer G-d bless
I love how people can try to call others names or declare themselves the judge of all character of others after they are long gone and unable to defend themselves.
The man preached the word of God to the Gentiles for the most part while the other Apostles preached the gospel to the Jewish people.
Paul was beheaded for preaching the gospel and the other Apostles were martyred as well except John who was exiled to the isle of Patmos.
All together today anyone can know God because the Veil was torn at the Crucifixion of Christ and all can enter to seek God beyond the torn Veil where ANYONE can be set free from the eternal bonds of Sin.
There is no more Temple standing at the moment and in the meantime we can seek God the way Paul teaches where by Faith we can know God and it’s by Faith that we are all given as a gift to understand God with Romans12v3.
Why Faith? Because none of us can see God right now and Gods presence anyways is not found in a temple anymore but resides inside oneself when they become a born again person.
Today one must become reborn again to see the Kingdom of God John3v3. And the Kingdom of God is a spiritual kingdom that one can know that is explained in the Bible and talked about but to know it intimately you have to born anew and leave your old life at the Cross.
You say we need Faith
'No one can see god right now.'
This Blind leading the blind
Because each child has their god if allowed
King Aretas IV (the 4th) had no control on over the city of Damascus on at that time and Paul says that he escaped from King Aretas IV (the 4th) then went into Arabia Nabataean where King Aretas IV (the 4th) reigned on in?
The Rabbi is on point, per usual. Outstanding critiques and analysis.
To be fair, the oldest Israelite traditions included human sacrifice, and there are breadcrumbs leading back to this in the Hebrew Bible -- Yhwh did not thirst after only the blood of animals. The story of Jephthah comes to mind, in which the spirit of Yhwh descends upon him, then he makes the oath to sacrifice whoever walks out of his house after he returns victorious, and then Yhwh makes him victorious and accepts the sacrifice of his daughter, which is not much different from the human sacrifices for victory carried out by the neighboring nations against whom Israel fought. The Tanakh includes laws demanding the sacrifice of the first born, as well as a law saying that anyone committed to being sacrificed could not be redeemed. Ezekiel wrote that Yhwh gave Israel an evil law, specifically the sacrifice of the first born, as a punishment.
While Judaism moved away from the practice of blood magic sacrifices, it is an undeniable part of the religion's history. In this sense, the god of Paul is closer to that primordial god of bloodlust than the modern Jewish god. And importantly, the prophetic critique of temple worship was ineffective, unimportant, and uninfluential until the Romans destroyed the temple and put an end to Jewish blood sacrifices, so Paul was not out of alignment with the Judaism of his day.
Edits: spelling, format, phrasing
Tovia is an absolute legend.
12 minute video by Michael Menasgotz proves that Christianty is a roman creation, they left their signature in the gospels.
Tovia is a nothing but a liar his face shines of a deceit….. JESUS IS YHWH
Don’t fall for unsupported conspiracy theories no actual biblical scholar believes in. Tbh, that one is dumb on its face even with no expert knowledge on Ancient Greek literature.
Interesting theory. Didn't the Romans persecute the Christians a fair bit though?
@@Mercury-Wells couple of important things regarding this:
1)
The martyrdoms of the apostles are entirely fabricated, DarkMatter2525 did a good job proving this in his 40 minute video "Did the Apostles Die for a Lie?", in which he shows how the Church clearly fabricated stories and had clear intent.
For example, Capholic church invented the idea that paul was "beheaded", but its a false tradition/invention.
There is also a good book called "The Myth of Persecution | How Early Christians Invented A Story of Martyrdom" by Candida Moss. She shows how stories of christian persecution were forged in order to bolster the beliefs of christians - its quite a simple yet effective tactic. Jesus says that preaching his message will get you "persecuted".
@@Mercury-Wells
2)
Romans killing Krastians is a made up story.. Roman writings never mention this killing of Krastians - it did not make it into the historical record.
There were several sects of Krastianity who were often at great odds with each other. Most of them increased their numbers by including even enemies of Rome amongst their ranks. The Official Roman sponsored Krastians would throw the contenders aka all who believed in a different version of the Kristos or romanized version of the messianic prophesies' Messiah and or his history.
Why would Rome massacre Krastians if they were taught to live a peaceful life from the JC teachings? Makes no sense, even the Romans were very liberal with others cultures and religions as long as they did not question authority - and the gospels clearly say that governments are instituted by God himself and to not rebel against them, and to render unto Kayzar his taxes for he is appointed by god himself here on this earth, and to turn the other cheek.
3) There were laws which persecuted Krastian groups that rested on Shabat, the law forced them to work on Shabat in order to not "juedaize" Shabat. The gospels always talk about how persecution comes from the Jewels not the Jentyles. The real persecution was of Jeuweish messianic rebels. "Krastians" persecuted were actually heretical Jewels , paul persecuted them , paul replaced Mozes law and hated cirkumcision.
Unlike the pastors, preachers or priests today, Paul did not have any gospels to rely on when talking abt Jesus. He was not aware that Jesus had urged the believers to take holy eucharist. All Paul knew is Jesus had taught about LOVE...love God, love thy neighbours love the gentiles, love yor haters, love yr enemies etc!
No, Paul knew everything Jesus inspired him to know upon their fateful meeting.
Arabia ties to Nabataean where King Aretas IV (the 4th that is) took and reigned as king during the time of Herod Antipas at the time period of 37 A.D. because Herod Antipas got defeated on in 37 A.D. by King Aretas (IV the 4th) according to history records that is
There is a 2nd author of the book of Acts who traveled with Apostle Paul and who met the people that apostle Paul had took and met......
Rebeka and Jacob conspired to decieve Isaac? And this act denies the blessing to Eusa? How then is the blessing then shared with all of Israel and not only Judah the oldest of the sons? And why not to all the sons of Abraham especially his first born Ishmael?
Did Apostle Paul ever mention ("Tertius,") the supposed writer of the book (or the "letter,") of Romans did Apostle Paul ever take and mention or write about Tertius on in any of his letters?
as an adolescent I became convinced of Christianity when I learned how the early followers were willing to die for their faith.
I realized Jesus death was exactly like killing a virgin for a good harvest about 10 years ago. That was the end of Christianity for me. I have long thought Paul was a Kenneth Copeland grifter for a really long time. A Joseph Smith kind of guy is even more accurate! 🤣
The Christians didn't murder Jesus and Paul, the Romans and Jews did.
@26beegee
A New Covenant wasn't prophesied?
Jeremiah 31:31-34
Jeremiah 50:1-5
The Old Covenant was honored by Israel?
Deuteronomy 31:16
Hosea 8:1
Jeremiah 11:10
1 Kings 19:10
God accepts Israel's sacrifices to atone for their sins?
Malachi 2:8-14
Jeremiah 6:20
Amos 5:21-22
Hosea 9:4
Isaiah 1:11-17
@26beegee - YOU "realized" ?? I guess you believe that you are "God" now huh ??
Just "realize" anything you want and it turns into the TRUTH....NOT.
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms I have a brain, therefore, I can realize, understand, become enlightened, learn, reason, think, imagine, figure out, feel, think and decide among many other things my brain enables me to do. I do not have to be a god to do any of those things. And guess what!?!? You are capable of doing all those things too! Isn’t the brain amazing? It even keeps our blood flowing, our lungs to breathe continuously, our kidneys and bowels to function, reproduce and all the other functions required to keep our bodies and species functioning that we don’t even have to think about! No god required for any of those things. Every living animal, plant and every living thing is an amazing eco-system all on its own! If there were such a thing as miracles I would call life itself a miracle. But since there are no miracles I will call every living thing an amazing wonder of nature. I can almost guarantee I value life more than you do! Sure hope you reach enlightenment some day so you can be amazed by the natural wonders all around you!
The saying , the devil is in the details, is apt for Christianity in all it's flavours and Judaism
Wow!!!🤯after this brilliant analizes,who needs more explanations!?Brilliant rabbi,brilliant!👍👍👍💎
@milkamilosevic9626 - You are being "sarcastic" right ?? 🤣😂😄🤣😀🤣
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms No,I reali mean it..iff you are sarcastic it's your choice😒
I am an atheist but i hope to god that god loves animals.
OMG YES!!! I wish them Godspeed.
Atheism is very good way for sinners hide from truth about God.they can crime against god before catch.they can disturb next generation with out proper añswer .proud of there wealth they hide in there den .once devil come and chain to eternal wicked place
@perfectblindguy - Why would God NOT "love animals" ??
He created them for us to take care of, and HE did NOT create anything to be "killed", as God is the author of LIFE, NOT "death".
@@menmustchangebeforekingdomslooks like your imaginary friend from your ridiculous mythology really messed things up, then.
@@aaronmatzkin7966 - A very "ignorant" statement from a "corrupt" carnal human being who Jesus died for, so that what happened in the beginning (which you are "clueless" to), would be taken care of in the end. Keep "spitting" in the eye of your Creator, you are just storing up more 'Wrath" for yourself.
And the Apostle Paul was the last desciple to be called by Jesus Luke 18:22. I believe he was also present at the time of the baptism of Jesus Christ, because he would have known about John the Baptist and everything he said concerning the Messiah, which could have prompted him, as a Pharisee of pharisees, to seek out validation from him in Luke 18.
1) The rich young ruler's main concern was to "inherit eternal life " vs 18. He judged himself worthy because he believed he had been obeying all the laws.
2) He had been listening to Jesus's teachings and was convinced that he was a man of authority, though, he wasn't ready to accept the fact He could be the Messiah, so he approached Jesus in a condescending manner- as he was a pharisee and they believed themselves to be above everyone else. So, he sucked up to Jesus by calling Him "Good Master ". Jesus saw through him and responded in a way that means He was God, if Paul believed that He was good, and went on to poke holes in his legalistic beliefs- he believed he never committed adultery, but Jesus taught that to just look on a maiden lustfully already constituted a breaking of the law, so was bearing false witness, which they were notorious for, but wouldn't admit to, so he was indirectly stealing from the temple coffers in the name of doing business for God Galatians 1:14; as was not honoring their fathers and mothers in the name of bringing offerings to the temple etc. and finally, told him to get rid of the source of his pride: his wealth, and distribute to the poor, as they usually pretended to do to look good before the people. He wasn't ready to even exchange that to gain eternal life, which Jesus understood (and gave him time before answering his calling vs 22).
He began to follow Jesus from then onwards, persecuting Him just to get physical proof on Him as a fraud. I believe he was behind all the questions to get Jesus to break the laws- including paying taxes (Jesus was called the Son of David, David and his house have been tax exempt by King Saul, for slaying Goliath, by this they're negating His relationship with King David, hence, cannot be the Messiah, they even insult Him of being born of fornication, as Mary got pregnant before getting married John 8:41 etc.)
3) I believe he spearheaded the group that deceived Judas to betray Him, and those they bought to shout "crucify him " over and over again until Jesus was crucified on the cross. He really did persecute Jesus and by so doing, get to follow Him as other desciples, learning from His teachings all along, even sneaking behind to witness the last supper to confidently say he received it of the Lord
1 Corinthians 11:23, to make hin an Apostle born out of due time - long after his calling 1 Corinthians 15:8.
3) His anger made him turn his his back on his own life, and began to persecute everyone linked to Jesus, from Stephen up till the time he fell off his high horse- so to speak, and was forced to come to reality of who Jesus Christ really was- The Son if man(David), The Son of God, which he knew all along but his legalistic mind was resisting it: he finally called Jesus "Lord", though subconsciously, but he always knew He was Lord when he heard His voice again Acts 9:4-5.
After this, he became so overzealous enough to begin to let everyone know that "Jesus was the Son of God, and the Messiah" vs 20,22. He began to immediately experience persecution himself, which got him to Arabia, where he had ample time and opportunity to review all the proof he had collected while he was persecuting Jesus 2 Timothy 4:13. He could even have been the naked young man, who was used to entrap JesusChriston the night of His arrest. Mark 14:51-52. (That was why he could write with so much understanding of the Lord in all his epistles).
4) Philippians 3 was where he finally came to terms with the fact that all his wealth could not be exchanged for the knowledge of Christ and gaining eternal life- his all life pursuit Luke18:18! This came at a price though - he lost all his fortune, that he wasn't willing to give up at that time: Luke 18:18-30, calling them "dung." But now, forgetting all his past life and pressing towards the prize of the "high calling " of Jesus, as he now sees it!
That was why it was easy for the other desciples to extend to him the right hand of fellowship as the Apostle of the gentiles Galatians 2:9.
That was also why he could withstand the other desciples when they were preaching the law and circumcision together with the grace of God in Christ Jesus in Acts 15. Immediately after preaching in the synagogue that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, Acts 9:20-22, God sent Barnabas to help him fulfill his calling, and spread the gospel if salvation to both Jews and gentiles, especially the gentiles.
The gospel of the salvation of our souls is simply by grace through faith in the sacrificial death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ and the completed work of the cross that no one can add to or remove from by doing good or bad. The Holy Spirit was sent to guide, teach, interpret, and keep until the end, John 14:26. Thus, He quickenes the believers and takes them all up at rapture. Until then, we give ourselves to studying the scriptures to make ourselves approved unto God as workmen that need not be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth-daily!
That was the reason why the Apostle loved his Jewish brethren so much that he wouldn't mind being accursed, as long as they can all (the 12 tribes), be saved! Romans 9:3!
That was the reason he endures so much beatings and maltreatment from the Jews, who really hated him, but he continued to concern himself with them, even took up collection of money for the Jewish belivers, even though he was sent to the gentiles-39 stripes 5 timed, got shipwrecked, got bitten by a venomous snake, but like the Duracell battery, he still kept going strong till the end! How stinky and painful and full of putrefying sores, his body must have been, yet he kept on going...
So he ran and finished his course and ensured that the outcast tribe of Benjamin, finally has a place in the body of Jesus Christ, and will sit with Him on the right hand of the throne of God, in heavenly places!
He made and left us all a legacy, so we can all make it. Thus, he is free from the blood of everyone who rejects so great a salvation story!
By his own words, Paul never met Jesus. All his modifications to Jesus's theology were through "visions". All he needed was a hat wherein to put his head while dictating. James and the others were not fans of this Greco Roman dude hijacking their church.
And:
Paulism is the religion of a human sacrifice of a man who was born of the divine rape of a little girl.
God rapes little girl, then kills her son as a LITERAL blood sacrifice to himself.
That...is vile.
@@davis.fourohfour
Take it up with God.
@@davis.fourohfour - So what if Paul did not get a chance to meet Jesus while He was still alive in the flesh, Paul's teaching's CONFIRM the Words of Jesus and that Jesus visited him in a vision because he taught the EXACT SAME THING JESUS TAUGHT. Don't agree ? BOTH JESUS & PAUL TAUGHT TO OBEY THE 10 COMMANDMENTS : JESUS said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honor thy father and thy mother: and, THOU SHALT LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF." (Matthew 19:18,19)
PAUL said, "For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal,Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, THOU SHALT LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF."
(Romans 13:9)
********************************************
BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT "ONE GOD"
********************************************
"JESUS answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel;
The Lord our God is ONE LORD:" (Mark 12:29)
PAUL said, "and that there is none other GOD but ONE....but to us there is but
ONE GOD.."(1st Corinthians 8:4,6)
*********************************************
BOTH JESUS & PAUL TAUGHT FORGIVENESS
OF SINS THROUGH JESUS' BLOOD
*********************************************
JESUS said, "For this is MY BLOOD of the New Testament, which is shed for many FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS" (Matthew 26:28)
PAUL said, "in whom we have redemption through HIS BLOOD, THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS, according to the riches of his grace;" (Ephesians 1:7)
********************************************
BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT THAT
JESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO THE FATHER
*****************************************************************
"JESUS saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life:
NO MAN COMES UNTO THE FATHER BUT BY ME." (John 14:6)
PAUL said, "for THROUGH HIM,(Jesus), we both have access
by one Spirit unto the Father." (Ephesians 2:18)
*************************************************************
BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT THAT JESUS WAS SINLESS
*************************************************************
JESUS said, "Which of you convinces me of SIN?
And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?" (John 8:46)
PAUL said, "For he hath made him to be sin for us, WHO KNEW NO SIN;
that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." (2nd Corinthians 5:21)
**********************
Would you like 100 more scriptures ??
Silence
Jesus rules
You synopsis would have been worthy of being fleshed out and canonised as the fifth Gospel if only you had written it before the Council of Nicea.
Such were the authors writing for the Legend of the Messiah who was baptized by John the Baptist and faced his demon for forty days and nights fasting in the wilderness, and won.
The man who became still and knew.
And the easy stories about the she-said, he-said deeds that followed.
Today, a Netflix script will bring your words to life.
Entertained. Hopeful. Sad. Blockbuster.
And the audience went home from their bread and circus none the wiser, but knew there were still Superheroes out there to save them from each other; and who would choose them from the masses.
Great Stuff, as usual 👋🇦🇺 Keep up the fantastic work
Did paul write Talmud , Sanhedrin 77a.
Is it true according to your talmud, your text, if you bound your neighbour and he died of starvation, you are not liable to execution in Judaism.
Tertius......was he the one who had traveled with Apostle Paul? Was Tertius the person who wrote the second half of the book of Acts?
yea right, because Paul the ex-Pharissees . from the tribe of Benjamin ( unlike Tobia from the 13th Tribe/ Kahzars 😂) studied in the feet of Gamaliel, concerning the Law blameless, wrote thru the inspiration of the Holy Spirit that the Jews was the enemy of the Gospel😂 (Romans 11:28).Nothing new😂
The apostle Peter declared Paul was writing scripture.
2 Peter 3:15-16
@bretherenlee1404 few scholars believe Peter actually wrote 2 Peter. When you realize it's almost certainly a forgery, your argument disappears.
@@asphilosophyusa prove he didn't write it
@@asphilosophyusa their bases for denying 2 Peter is because of an assumption of when Jesus would return. They have assumed something the scriptures never said
@bretherenlee1404 there are a lot more reasons to be suspicious than just that. Even the compilers of the Canon doubted its authenticity. My question is, what evidence do you see that it _was_ truly written by Peter other than the fact it was attributed to him by _some_ people in the early church?
@@asphilosophyusa what evidence do you have that it was not? People saying things is not proof
Tertius knows Timothy personally as a worker and Aquila and Priscilla and Gaius whom Paul talks about on in his letter's
("Tertius,") was that name a pen name another name that apostle Paul took and used? (Romans 16:22 verse.)
Tertius who says that he wrote the letter of Romans and NOT Apostle Paul states that he knew Timothy as a worker who worked with him and (Tertius) states that he also knew Priscilla too and Aquila......
“Angel of YHWH,” was a trick that comes from the Hebrew Bible, e.g. Genesis 22:11-15
Apostle Paul does mention ("Titus,") but is, ("Tertius,") another name for Titus?
Why escape from Damascus from King Aretas IV (the 4th) and then go directly on into enemy territory on after that in Nabatean?
I know I'm just a random guy on the internet, but I think Rabbi Singer _completely_ misunderstands Paul. His error is failing to consider Paul's audience. If you truly want to understand Paul, you need to separate his personal piety from what the early church believed was required of Gentiles. The letter to the Romans is nothing if not a midrash on Jeremiah 31:31-34 and Ezekiel 36:16-36. Paul does not quote his sources in their entirety, but he does quote Ezekiel 36:21 in Romans 2:24. Of course, you should not let my suggestion hang on one verse, but here is Paul in his own words: "in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fully met in us" (Romans 8:4). That is, just as Deuteronomy 30:6, 8 (later taken up by Jeremiah and Ezekiel) predicts an act of God to cause people to fulfill the law from the inside out, so also Paul says this is happening in real time in his day. What Singer finds so offensive (rather, where he gets confused) is his applying to Jews what Paul _and_ the Jerusalem church said of Gentiles: they were not obligated to proselytize: "Yet not even Titus, who was with me, was compelled to be circumcised, even though he was a Greek" (Galatians 2:3). This coheres perfectly with the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15. The debate about Gentiles keeping the law makes _absolutely no sense_ unless it was agreed that Jews were still expected to. But Paul's letters are NOT addressed to Jews, so the antinomian accusation is totally bogus. So to restate it: Paul's issue was with zealots who were telling his Gentile converts that, even though they had already received the Spirit, they needed to be circumcised for it to count. Paul was harsh in rejecting this, and the picture that emerges is not unlike what Singer says, but it's a straw man if you are saying it applies to Jewish believers keeping the law.
It would have been helpful if you had asked Singer what he thinks Gentiles need to do to have eternal life. In other settings, he has not said "became 100% card carrying Jews." Ironically, he agrees with Paul way more than he thinks.
They know but they hate Jesus so stands to reason they hate anyone who follows yeshuah.
@@clydewaldo3144 These have the appearance of academic discussions, but Singer doesn't even seem to know who Paul's audience is.
If you want to to say Paul audience is the Gentiles and say that is something the person you call Jesus also wanted to convey, isnt from the 4 gospels. Jesus always told his disciples to Not go the way of the gentiles but to the lost sheep of the House of Isreal. So if Jesus never taught that to his disciples but Paul who message is to the Gentiles,something dont fit. Acts try to fix this with the dream they say Peter has about the unclean animals. That contradicts anything Jewish. Acts contradicts Pauls letters about even meeting any disciple of Jesus which he says he didnt meet til 3 years into his ministry. Either Jesus came Only for the Lost Sheep of the Isreal in which he teaches or Paul isnt a true messenger of Jesus.
@@daniellyons4021 You're even more confused than Rabbi Singer. First, if you trust the four gospels, you likely know that most scholars believe Acts was written by the same author as Luke. Whether that is a man named Luke is irrelevant. So your first mistake is imposing a false dichotomy on the text that the author and implied readers would not perceive. Second, the gospels record Jesus sending his disciples on one or two missions during which he instructed them not to go to the nations. It is NEVER stated anywhere that that was permanent. As far as we know, they adhered to that instruction. Third, in Acts 11 Peter interprets the dream described in Acts 10. Peter's interpretation is NOT that the food laws have been abolished but that the vision was a metaphor indicating that the Gentiles have been declared clean, as evidenced by the outpouring of the Spirit. It sounds like you don't think Isaiah 2 is Jewish? How about Isaiah 49? Daniel 7? Genesis 12? There are no contradictions here. Finally, you _could_ be correct about when Paul met the other apostles, but you could also be incorrect. Paul's first visit to Jerusalem is said to take place after sufficient time (ἡμέραι ἱκαναί) had passed to draw the ire of the Jews in Damascus (Acts 9:23). The text is vague about how much time passed between fleeing his enemies in Damascus and coming to Jerusalem. But here I am indulging your inability to focus on the topic at hand, as this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with expectations for Jews and Gentiles.
Both Christianity and Islam have borrowed a lot from Judaism and Old Testament!
Jesus had more respect for Christianity
Ironically current Christians are completely against Judaism!
Tertius the writer of Romans if there was a person who was named Tertius who had written the book of Romans would have had to have known the people that Apostle Paul had met personally because the writer states that he had already had met them on Paul's trips to those places that Apostle Paul had traveled on to
Paul was one of the most revolutionary thinkers in human history and his influence has absolutely saturated the modern secular world. You dont have to be Christian to believe that. Read Badiou's "St. Paul: The Foundation of Universalism."
@mcosu1 - "St. Paul: The Foundation of Universalism" is nothing but 100% PURE TRASH and is the COMPLETE OPPOSITE of what Paul taught.
I have met plenty of religious believers and leaders that quote their scripture out of context confidently. I dont think they are lying for power, more likely, they are just arrogant and dont consider that they could be wrong about any given topic. How can we say confidently that paul was deliberately lying, rather than just being an arrogant man with theological disagreements with others?
If Psalms 69:25 verse was about Judas Iscariot as the writer of Acts wrote that apostle Peter took and said......did Judas Iscariot have multiple tents that he dwelled on in?
As an Atheist, I would say that Apostle Paul was MUCH BETTER than Moses.
Moses sanctioned things such as racism/ethnocentrism, slavery, rape, genocide and many other crimes against humanity.
Apostle Paul reformed Judaism towards better morals.
Paul's morals were not perfect, but they were significantly better than Moses' morals.
I would rather live in a society based on Paul's morality than Moses' morality.
You have a point my friend
Paul upheld all human relations of his time, including glorifying slavery
@@scienceexplains302
Where does Apostle Paul "glorify slavery?"
Please give me a reference.
@@francmittelo6731 1 Corinthians 7:17 he says God assigned people to their positions.
Galatians 4:23-31 he says how good it is that slaves ares excluded from God’s promise to Abraham.
In Philemon 1:9 and :13 he uses slavery as a metaphor for adherence to Jesus.
Moses is a myth. Paul was at least a real Dude... but I understand what you are saying
Paul is 1 reason why I left Christianity. I have had people argue points using quotes from Paul where I was quoting Yeshua. One day looked at it all said to myself the church really has little to do with Yeshua and way more to do with Paul. Paul 100% conman where Yeshua teaches acts of kindness and love toward your fellow man will give you redemption and you will welcomed into Heaven. How Paul says only faith in the death and resurrection of will give you eternal life. Big difference how has this man fooled Christians for 2000 years.
@lylemccomber9460 - That is a really profound post considering the TRUTH that Paul taught EXACTLY what Jesus taught: BOTH JESUS & PAUL TAUGHT TO OBEY THE 10 COMMANDMENTS: JESUS said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honor thy father and thy mother: and, THOU SHALT LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF."
(Matthew 19:18,19)
PAUL said, "For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, THOU SHALT LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF." (Romans 13:9)
********************************************
BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT "ONE GOD"
********************************************
"JESUS answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel;
The Lord our God is ONE LORD:" (Mark 12:29)
PAUL said, "and that there is none other GOD but ONE....but to us there is but
ONE GOD.."(1st Corinthians 8:4,6)
*********************************************
BOTH JESUS & PAUL TAUGHT FORGIVENESS
OF SINS THROUGH JESUS' BLOOD
*********************************************
JESUS said, "For this is MY BLOOD of the New Testament, which is shed for many FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS" (Matthew 26:28)
PAUL said, "in whom we have redemption through HIS BLOOD, THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS, according to the riches of his grace;" (Ephesians 1:7)
********************************************
BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT THAT
JESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO THE FATHER
*****************************************************************
"JESUS saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life:
NO MAN COMES UNTO THE FATHER BUT BY ME." (John 14:6)
PAUL said, "for THROUGH HIM,(Jesus), we both have access
by one Spirit unto the Father." (Ephesians 2:18)
*************************************************************
BOTH JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT THAT JESUS WAS SINLESS
*************************************************************
JESUS said, "Which of you convinces me of SIN?
And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?" (John 8:46)
PAUL said, "For he hath made him to be sin for us, WHO KNEW NO SIN;
that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." (2nd Corinthians 5:21)
*****************************************************************
Would you like 100 more scriptures ??
If when to go for it. But to be honest I don't really care if you do. I have no regard what so ever for Paul. But how about you write his contradictions. But I wont read it anyway.
@@lylemccomber9460 - Paul NEVER "contradicted" Jesus, if you "think" he did, then "YOU" post the seemingly "contradictions". But you won't, because there are NONE.
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms Matthew 5:17-20 Yeshua words Galatians 5:4 Paul
@@lylemccomber9460 Paul said that you are NOT JUSTIFIED by the Law, he didn't say not to OBEY IT !! This is what Paul said about the Law. For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal,Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any othe, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law."
(Romans 13:8-10)
"Know you not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS SHALL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, SHALL INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (1st Corinthians 6:9,10)
"Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I TELL YOU BEFORE AS I HAVE ALSO TOLD YOU IN TIME PAST, that THEY WHICH DO SUCH THINGS WILL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (Galatians 5:19-21)
""But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, WE OURSELVES ARE ALSO FOUND SINNERS, is therefore Christ THE MINISTER OF SIN ? GOD FORBID ! .For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself A TRANSGRESSOR." (Galatians 2:17,18)
"What shall we say then? SHALL WE CONTINUE IN SIN, , that grace may abound? GOD FORBID !. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?" (Romans 6:1,2)
" What shall we say then? IS THE LAW SIN ? GOD FORBID !.
Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet....Wherefore THE LAW IS HOLY, and THE COMMANDMENT HOLY, AND JUST, AND GOOD." (Romans 7:7,12)
****************************************************************************
Jesus CLEARLY says in Matthew 5:17,18 that "HE", "HE". "HE" came to FULFILL THE LAW. "You" have ALREADY BROKEN the Law so "You" CANNOT fulfill it, therefore, the ONLY WAY you could be JUSTIFIED by the Law is to OBEY IT WITHOUT BREAKING IT, Get It ??
Also, you don't seem to understand what Jesus was saying in Matthew 5:20. Jesus is saying that the Pharisee's are NOT going into the Kingdom of Heaven because their "Righteousness" is NOT SUFFICIENT !! That is why Jesus said that YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS MUST "Exceed" theirs in order for YOU to go in.
Jesus is saying that it is IMPOSSIBLE for men to enter the Kingdom of Heaven in their "own" obedience or their "own" "work" because they are ALREADY GUILTY OF BREAKING THE LAW.
It is Written: "When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, WHO THEN CAN BE SAVED ? Jesus said unto them, WITH MEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE., but with God, all things are possible." (Matthew 19:25,26)
Several decades ago, when my christian faith was wavering, I read The Case For Christ. For me, the clincher was "why would anyone be willing to die for a lie?" and therefore the early christians must have actually encountered the risen Jesus. Yet we see Paul, the guy who might be the strongest advocate of this religion, apparently raking in the shekels, the first apparently leading to the mega-churches of today. And although I agree with the good Rabbi that Acts is fan-fiction, when Paul is hauled into court, no one raises the issue that he is claiming the convicted felon Jesus might have actually escaped execution. "Wanted die or alive" type posters would have been offering a lot more than 30 pieces of silver IF the authorities had any evidence of a post-crucifixion Jesus and Paul would have been tortured to give up the location of Jesus.
Was Paul using the name of Tertius? Or was Tertius actually a person who Apostle Paul took and knew?
Good video. Thanks again.
dude, the Flavians bro ...
Nabatneatan was in Arabia on at that time and if Apostle Paul went to Arabia then i can see why King Aretas IV (the 4th that is) took and tried capturing him because the Nabateans didn't get along well with the Jewish people especially with Herod Antipas
People still need books, though, for research papers.
How can you keep the Mosaic covenant.... without a temple for 2000 years ?
You can't. And where did God grant rabbis the authority to lead his people in the wake of the Temple's destruction? He didn't. Why? Because that authority passed to the Roman Catholic Church and its universal mission, encompassing both Jews and Gentiles, through his divine Son. We've never heard a peep out of God since that time, nor will we, until the Son returns at the End of Days.
@@jimnewl
When did the "God" promised to save Edom?
@@jimnewlI disagree with both you AND Singer. Paul's letters were addressed to non-Jews, so we shouldn't assume his beliefs about what Jews should believe/do based on what he said gentiles should believe/do. In other places (e.g. Acts 21) we have good evidence that Paul remained personally faithful to the Jewish law throughout his life. The notion that the Church replaced Israel wouldn't take hold within gentile Christianity until a bit later, I'd say starting with Justin Martyr's "Dialogue with Trypho".
This is an important issue: Why's the veracity of Paul's Apostleship coming under attack? Because TRUTH is under all-out attack. By dismissing Paul you're USURPING the *completed Word of God* - not "Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth."
As an "awakened" new ager I dissed Paul (once or twice) thinking I knew better, but now I'm BORN AGAIN I see better: I SEE he was full of the same *Spirit* filling me - and that's ALL I need to know about Paul: that he was anointed by the *Holy Spirit.* Paul was appointed by *Jesus Himself* and HE don't make mistakes.
Seriously, Paul wrote as he was moved by the Holy Spirit, so to insult him is to insult *God's SPIRIT* which, Jesus says, is tantamount to the *unpardonable sin.*
Under the inspiration of the Spirit of God - Paul said, *"Follow me as I follow Christ."* We're not dealing with a man who glorifies himself but someone who the Holy Spirit led to write about his life experience, because GOD is holding him up as the example for us, so HOW DARE anyone say that we shouldn't follow his example.
Paul's personality shows in his writings, as all the authors of scripture do. But Paul ain't simply rehearsing something that he sat down and learned and meditated and said "well now this is what I'll write." No, he wrote as he was moved by the HOLY SPIRIT. We have to stress Paul's apostleship for the church age as over and against Christ's Ministry in the Gospels; but people cry, "I'm gonna go with what Jesus said." They're well meaning but NOT THINKING. Everything Jesus said in his earthly ministry - with exception of the last chapters of the gospels after His resurrection - was BEFORE THE CROSS. He hadn't died yet; his blood hadn't been shed and nothing is mooted of that in His preaching..... When you go by what Jesus said in his earthly ministry you're going by that which is BEFORE THE CROSS.
Rightly Divide the Word of Truth! When you get to the Apostle Paul he makes it so plain that everything he writes he receives from the Lord IN GLORY. It's still the Words of Jesus only now it's in that time that's most appropriate: post Resurrection. He's FINISHED the Work of the Cross. We have to adhere to the writings of Paul because that's where the MEAT of our doctrine stands.
So by your logic, anyone who disagrees or "attacks" you is making an unpardonable sin, because you are moved by the holy spirit?
That's an easy way to shut down conversation, huh?
Christianity is Edom's salvation.
Meaning, all kingdoms come to an end. You people had your time of rulership and you and your man-god brought all the nations down.
@@joecheffo5942Your doctrine isn't Jewish doctrine. Can we agree to disagree?
@@brynawaldman5790 OK, but Paul was not an Apostle. He never met Jesus. He said he had a vision of Jesus after his death. I am not convinced.
Exactly correct in recognizing the separate paths.
There is a gospel of John the Baptist's 'repent, for the kingdom of heaven is near' that Jesus had continued, and his early disciples continued, where the truth healed people by release.
Then there is the abuse of Jesus's dead body, and the delusion by faith that healed people by their oath of bondage and as long as they are being kept upset by 'never there yet'.
Looking away from the car headlights, or remaining fixated in the car headlights for a hope of peace.
There are many more Preferential headlights to jump into.
I have a lot of sympathy for the Hellenistic pagan world. Reading the Emperor Julian's "Against the Galileans" it is clear that he thinks that the Christians have taken the worst of Hellenism and the worst of Judaism to fabricate their religion. Julian thought the Jews far exceeded the Christians in wisdom, and indeed wanted to help rebuild the Jewish Temple. It was a tragedy that he died too soon.
your ads killed the show
The writer of Acts wrote it all wrong was all. Same thing with the book of Luke. No watchtower is mentioned on in the book of Luke about the ("parable of the Tenants.") And the, ("mulberry tree too being planted on in the sea underneath water.") Luke 17:6 verse
Joseph Jacob's son didn't have 9 children as it is shown written on in the Greek Septuagint
This is what Tovia Singer is "hiding" from you because YOU REFUSE to read the NT for YOURSELF !! Paul said this about the LAW. "For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law." (Romans 13:8-10)
"Know you not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS SHALL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, SHALL INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (1st Corinthians 6:9,10)
"Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I TELL YOU BEFORE AS I HAVE ALSO TOLD YOU IN TIME PAST, that THEY WHICH DO SUCH THINGS WILL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD." (Galatians 5:19-21)
""But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, WE OURSELVES ARE ALSO FOUND SINNERS, is therefore Christ THE MINISTER OF SIN ? GOD FORBID ! .For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself A TRANSGRESSOR." (Galatians 2:17,18)
"What shall we say then? SHALL WE CONTINUE IN SIN, , that grace may abound? GOD FORBID !. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?" (Romans 6:1,2)
" What shall we say then? IS THE LAW SIN ? GOD FORBID !.
Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet....Wherefore THE LAW IS HOLY, and THE COMMANDMENT HOLY, AND JUST, AND GOOD." (Romans 7:7,12)
Don't you feel a little "foolish" now ??
Don't be "spiritually" LAZY and read the New Testament FOR YOURSELF !!
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms get behind thee satan.
@@Fish4grapes Says the "fake" Christian.....Hahahahhahhaaa !!
Rabbi, your clarifications of the actual meanings of Old Test. lit. are very informative.
Question: In your view, was Paul actually a Pharisee? I doubt it.
No he proved in other videos that Paul could not have been a pharasee because Paul didn't speak hebrew at all, he quoted false translations from the greek version.
@@ts8960which video? I know for sure Colossians exhibits a very working knowledge of Hebrew, which isn't attributed to Paul by most. I'm pretty sure Romans does too which everybody considers Pauline
@@ts8960 To which Hebrew version does the guest refer? The Greek tends to be older than the Masoretic manuscripts. It is the guest who lies.
Christians, like many Jews at the time, absolutely _didn't care_ what the writers of OT scripture really meant. They were puzzling out secret messages concealed in scripture that would meet their needs. So complaints about them getting scripture wrong wholly miss the point.
@jansteinvonsquidmeirsteen2256 you have been lied to. The sea scrolls are much more aligned with the masoretic than it is the corrupt and completely debotched "septuigant" (which was only of 5 books of moses and we dont have the original septuigant) . You are insane btw for suggesting that every hebrew bible out there is corrupt, more than a greek translation, wow. That is inline with the muslim perspective which undermines ur religion as well.
If, "Tertius," wasn't Apostle Paul then Tertius was stating that he himself was a Benjaminite from the tribe of Benjamin and not apostle Paul
If Joseph had 9 son's the 7 other sons aren't mentioned or written about at all on in the Old Testament
I got a question that is confusing if you read in Matthew Judas who betrayed Jesus than realize what he done he went back threw the silver he got back and went hang himself .. Now if you read in Acts it says Judas was walking through the land he bought with the silver he got from what he did than fell headlong and his intestines burst out and died I don’t get it how can the same guy die twice in two different ways .. now this is confusing and doesn’t God say I’m not a God of confusion so anyone reading these two verses will be like wait this is confusing did he hang himself or did his intestines Burst out while walking through his land he bought didn’t he throw back the silver It says that In Matthew did he secretly go back get the silver back not hang himself and buy land 🤷🏼🤷🏼🤷🏼🤷🏼
This is where source criticism comes from. It is not just a new testament issue. It begins in the Torah
You need to read Paul as a Jew. He's not saying Jews can't keep the Torah. He claims to be perfect 'as to the law'. Paul is addressing pagan converts. 'wretched man that I am... " &c is Paul identifying with formerly idolotrous pagans. The question for Paul (& other first century Jews) was how goys would be admitted to the kingdom? As proselyte Jews, or as members of the Nations? If God is one, He is the God of the Nations too. To require the Gentiles to convert would deny the oneness of God.
Good grief man, Paul was a Jew not a Christian. There was no such thing as a Christian in Paul's time. You might not agree with him, but disowning him is small minded and petty. Guess you'd need to start another synagogue if he showed up?
If you keep on being so vitriolic you'll give yourself an ulcer.
Do you feel threatened by messianic Judaism?
Paul isn't saying Christians don't have to keep the Torah or shouldn't. Paul EXPECTS every believer to be torah observant.
Paul understands the one God doesn't have different standards for the two groups. This is hammered throughout Romans from start to finish. Christians keep the law. So does Galatians.
Did the rabbi ok the thumbnail? :/
Omg I just noticed 😂
He did him dirty
@@vikingdemonpr he's fixed it. Jacob is strange, I wrote that to help. He changes it and doesn't acknowledge my comment and it just makes my comment look deranged. Cheers man. :(
Trivia isn't saying that the only one who was able to keep the commandments was Jesus.
@History-Valley fix the thumbnail. It looks like you're calling Rabbi Singer a conman 😢😅
But when the fulness of the time was come, Elohiym sent forth his Son, who was born of a woman, and subject to the Law, Galatiym (Galatians) 4:4
I am YAHUSHA
Christians view ancient religious Israel in a broken state, in order to portray Jesus more comfortably as a Messia. But really what happend was that Judaism just went through a spiritual development, away from a fundamentalistic view. This was also prophesiede by Jeremiah. I dont want to say that orthodox Judaism is wrong, because those were the men protecting scripture. And they will do that for ever, because the covenant God made with Israel is enternal. When Moses received the commandments on Mount Sinai, God dictated his words with a sword. And on that sword the words ''You maybe next'' were engraved. The reason why God decided to show himself like that, is because we still live in a pagan world. It doesnt matter if Christians desperately and hypocritically suddenly became Gentiles, and certainly not if we merge with technology and become robots.
Please watch the debate between Dr Michael Brown and Tovia- this man is still scared of Dr Micheal Brown
BROTHER BERMAN AND RABBI SINGER, I SINCERELY APPRECIATE YOUR HAVING READ THE NEW COVENANT, AS MUCH AS WE ALSO READ YOUR OLD COVENANT (TANAKH). I WOULD LIKE YOU TO BE AWARE THAT IN PAUL THE RISEN CHRIST WAS DIRECTLY SPEAKING THROUGH A MAN. A LITTLE SIMILAR TO HOW MOSES WAS YOWEH'S SPOKESPERSON. SO IT IS A MATTER OF DIVINE REVELATION, AS EVEN PETER WROTE IN HIS LETTER AGAINST THOSE MISCONSTRUING PAUL'S WISDOM. LET US BEAR IN MIND THAT PAUL WAS A PHARISEE, THUS ESSENTIALLY A RABBI, BUT ALSO A JEW DESPERATE TO SHOW FELLOW JEWS THAT THERE IS A MORE REAL WAY OF SALVATION THAN THE LAW. HENCE, WHILE IT IS UNDERSTANDABLE THAT SINCERE JEWS HAVE DISDAIN FOR PAUL OVERTURNING THEIR RELIGION AT YESHUA'S (JEHOVAH SAVING) COMMAND, THEY SHOULD ADMIT THAT HE IS RIGHT AND COMPELLED DIVINELY. IT WAS ALSO HIM THAT WROTE THE LETTER TO HEBREWS, SO AS TO CLARIFY, AS A PHARISEE, WHY THE GOSPEL LIBERATES THE SINCERE FROM THE GUILT OF A NEAR-IMPOSSIBLE TORAH.
Maybe the Rabbi of his days confused Paul too? Paul lost his way.
Very interesting titles, but the host is very dry, and his monetizing ads are chaotic, intrusive ( mid thought interruptions ) and annoying scam ads ( free government food cards and other complete false baiting ).
He wanted people to believe him that he was prophet.He enjoyed being a rival to the true prophet.He failed to realize that he was decieved by satan in starting his own religion based on the religion of Jesus.His activity went full steam with disappearance of Jesus.Teaching new doctrine of his invention he noticed his doctrine gained popularity with the sin wipe off by just believing him.He was a liar .He admitted he was but his doctrine popularity was still growing nevertheless.In modern time church attendance reduced so popularity is reduced.
I think Singer should reveal to people of the world. That he the singer should explain why Paul a jew change to join Christ .What is the reason earlier he was a jew.Paul was aware of Torah n what he found in Torah was wrong. why was he thrown from a horse by the light .
Do you all really understand the power of God?..Who he is?...Do you really believe God would allow 2/3's of the New Testament in the KJV to be written by Paul if it was false? Jesus spoke in Matthew 12:24-26 (24) "But when the Pharisee's heard about the miracle, they aid, "No wonder he can cast out demons. He gets hi power from Satan, the prince of demons." (25) Jesus knew their thoughts and replied, "Any kingdom divided by civil war is doomed. A town or family splintered by feuding will fall apart. {26) And if Satan is casting out Satan, he is divided and fighting against himself. His own kingdom will not survive." Do you really believe God would fight against himself?
God is not d author of d new test
d new test is against d old.
He called Christianity a " weird sect".If Judaism was called a " weird sect", the Jewish anti defamation League would be all over it as antisemitism. Why escalate religious intolerance at this time? Superstitious religious people of one Faith attacking other religions will only inflame religious intolerance. Live and let live.
yet It’s the “Christian” USA that basically keeping all the 23 Arab counties at bay in the protection of Israel where this Rabbi lives. he needs to appreciate what Christians do to protect israel and give glory to Jesus Christ
It was a weird sect of Judaism, that’s literally how it began.
I think I know who the real con man is here.
I see toffee is still dodging debating michael brown. Peddling his wares to those gullible enough to swallow this drivel.
Jesus was not crucified. The Roman government released him. Barabbas, that was Jesus.
Let me jump on this thought real quick. I've been thinking about this too but disagree on the point that Barabbas got released.
Yes, Jesus Barabbas could be the historical Jesus. He fits the model of a messianic rebel. The thing is that the Gospel writers split Jesus into two: the messianic rebel who is Barabbas and the Pauline, peaceful, spiritual messiah Jesus. The point that the Gospel writers might have wanted to do is, in the context of the post war, that the Jews chose to side with the rebels (Barabbas) and rejected the peaceful messiah (Jesus). But I do think the historical Jesus was crucified by the Romans.
@@vikingdemonpr You bring up an interesting point. I have wondered why would the gospel writers put that passage in there. Maybe it was their tongue in cheek way of letting the reader know that what they were writing down was a bunch of shit. I think from a historical perspective, there is no way in hell that the Roman government would release a convicted murderer. It is a very interesting passage. But we do agree that Jesus might have been executed, but he was not crucified. My take is that no one was ever crucified. It was something that was made up.
@@perfectblindguy well crucifixion was the method of executing rebels and traitors to the Empire. During the war(66-73) Josephus reports that there were so many crucifixions that they ran out of trees.
@@perfectblindguyHow common was crucifixion in Jerusalem?
The practice became especially popular in the Roman-occupied Holy Land. In 4 B.C., the Roman general Varus crucified 2,000 Jews, and there were mass crucifixions during the first century A.D., according to the Roman-Jewish historian Josephus.
@@vikingdemonpr well, maybe but as far as archeology is concerned, nothing has been found to support crucifixion, except for one ankle bone with a nail in it. And I am not sure if that supported crucifixion or not. As far as Jesus is concerned, some of the earlier manuscripts say that it was a pole and not a T. Thusly, the Roman soldiers rammed a spear up his ass and that is how Jesus died, if he was executed. That's my two cents.
I now note with interest it's called "ACTS" not "Actions" of the apostles, i.e. acting or pretend.
If ignorance was money, this generation would be filthy rich.
Such hatred towards Paul and His teacher. Nothing has changed in 2000 years.
Dude Paul never walked with Jesus 😂
What was wrong with the preaching of John the Baptist? Why did the religious Jews reject him? Simply! They would not make public their secret sins! They were hypocrites at heart! Just as the Rabbi today nothing has changed. Men will not Repent
Jesus exposed Yahweh in the New Testament. "You have heard it said.....but I say" He even said a good father will not give you a serpent which is exactly what Yahweh the psycho god did in the OT. Jesus' Father was not Yahweh!
That's not what he was doing with the sermon on the mount
EXACTLY, IM GLAD YOU ARE DOING THE FATHERS WORK OF EXPOSING THIS KABBALISTIC , EASTERN EUROPEAN JUDAIZER WHO SAYS IS A JEW BUT HE AINT ONE!!!!
Marcion was right?
@@TheDanEdwards not according to the new testament, he wasn't.
@@garlandjones7709 Well, given Marcion is credited with having his fingers in the canonization process, maybe things are not quite what you've presumed.