@3:03 - the transfer of heat energy will NOT always alter the temperature of a system, such as when a phase change is occurring at a constant pressure. Very common misconception, so watch out.
@@professor_m_gibbons Does that mean the heat's energy temporarily stops going into kinetic energy and instead goes into breaking bonds at the instance of phase change (with constant pressure) then switches back to affecting kinetic speed of molecules after the phase change?
One question: Isn't the expression "heat flows from" misleading and incorrect? Instead, the expressions "thermal energy flows from" or "heat flow occurs from" are actually correct, isn't it?
My Physics improved from 50% on semester test 1 to 97% on semester test 2🎉🎉 Thank you sir, I have nothing to offer. I’ll thank you properly in the future.
I have a question that has troubled me for some time (making the link between the atomic world to the macroscopic). What happens if we have a spaceship in outer space, and let’s say it’s a perfect vacuum (so no friction will occur). If we accelerate the spaceship, it now has higher velocity and so higher kinetic energy. You could say therefore it has higher temperature? After all the average kinetic energy of all the particles has increased? This doesn’t make sense though. Is temperature relative? Another similar problem, say if the earth sped up due to a gravitational force, does that mean our individual temperature increases, after all our kinetic energy has increased.
Kinetic energy is based on velocity and velocity is relative, so temperature is too. If you accelerate an object in space relative to something else, I believe that it would count as increasing the average temperature of the system, as there would be more kinetic energy available. It would not increase the temperature of the object itself however, since relative to itself the average kinetic energy of its particles is the same.
2:22 Not all phases of matter expand with higher temperature. Water for example, is at its densest at 3.98 ⁰ C (according to the internet). Contraction upon heating in solids is called "negative thermal expansion."
"all phases of matter expand with higher temperature" actually not always true. the density of water decreases as the temperature increases from 32F to 39F
Can I say that any system has no need to transfer its energy to the other one in contact but as a natural consequence of action and reaction the energy gets distributed, eventually making the whole system reach equilibrium. Doesn't necessarily imply that energy is transferred from hot to cold and not from cold to hot it is just that the former does the transfer with a faster rate than the latter. Correct my intuition if I am wrong.
Great video and visuals. Thank you! Follow up question: The high specific heat capacity of water is due to strong covalent bonds of Hydrogen and Oxygen molecules INSIDE each water atom? Or, strong bonds between water molecules? Thank you, again!
I ended up here after watching the first 4 videos in the "Math and Science" channel -chemistry 1. It become paid to see at the same point where Prof. Dave here pics up the topic. Thanks for not making me Pay to Learn Dave. I wanna learn for free
I have a question.... If temperature measures the flow of heat then why do we not have any unit for say flow of pressure, potential,charges etc. Why only flow of heat gets a whole new SI unit
If heat inherently has physical meaning when in transit, constituting its existential definition as a form of energy in motion, what does it truly mean to say that heat 'flows'? When we assert that heat is a form of energy in transit, it implies movement; however, using the term 'flow' seems to redundantly invoke the concept of movement. How can the movement of energy itself be described as 'flow' without introducing redundancy?" I created this analogy to understand what the definition is trying to say:"When we say 'heat always flows from higher to lower temperature until thermal equilibrium is reached,' it conjures an image in my mind of an invisible 'glitter glow' dispersed in the atmosphere(massless being in motion). This 'glitter glow' represents the thermal energy, and with a temperature change, it becomes unevenly distributed. In this mental model, a chunk of the glitter glow with a relatively higher distribution moves towards a lower distribution in a flow, seeking to maintain symmetry as per the Thumb Rule of the universe.The glitter glow is thermal energy and when it flows we say that it's heat
@Professor Dave Explains I love all your highly educational videos that you do here on RUclips. I have a question! How come cold temperatures have a limit of around -273 C and warm temperatures can go well over 10,000 C or even can be over 1 million degrees? Please explain - THANKS.
Just like you can take away only 1 liter of water from a 1 litre beaker but you can keep adding water to it eventually leading it to overflow and you can still just add more. Atoms have a definite amount of energy so you can take away only that small amount, whereas you can give it a lot of heat but after a point its structure will be affected maybe bonds will break (in case of molecules) and after a point you will get plasma.
Temperature measure the amount of thermal energy available for work in system not heat...heat is transfer of thermal energy ( heat is a mechanism or process through which thermal energy transist)
1:20 faster moving particles with higher temperaure ... is correct for gasses and liquids, but not a sufficient expression and explanation for temperature changes in solids. One could misinterprete the statement and think that the atoms will vibrate more often, which is one of the most frequent misconseptions I have read about on scientific websites and forums about atomic motion. Every molecule, molecular solid or atomic solid has characteristic vibration frequencies in the range of 10^13 Hz due to their mass and force interactions. For example: If the frequency of a radiation source matches a molecules or atoms natural resonant frequency it begins to vibrate stronger, not more frequently! Now the energy of those vibrations can be transferred in solids due to whole lattice vibrations called phonons. I'm not trying to give a lecture here. But its such a common misconception that people say if you heat stuff, the frequency of the atomic vibrations increase, which is absolutely NOT true. It's the amplitude of the vibrations that gets larger. Of course this explanation was viewed at with classical mechanics, quantummechanically everything has to do with probability waves and distributions... but the probability of finding a particle will shift towards a higher distance if we give the system more energy. If you look at the asymmetric potential curve you get the idea... The frequency of atomic oscillations simply do not change, otherwise IR-Spectroscopy would not work, as peaks would shift around all the time being a strongly temperature dependant measurement method, which it is not! One thing you can get is overtones of vibrations at higher temperatures... The frequencies which change will eventually be those of the whole macroscopic lattice due to thermal expansion and changes in the elastic modulus of the solid. I think why most people think that atoms change their vibration frequencies is due to incandescence... simply speaking if the amplitude of a vibrating system increases but the vibration frequency stays the same, the particles have to travel a longer distance in the same amount of oscillations. Thus ultimately your statement is correct that the particles have to move faster. Faster moving particles means that more energy is involved... Electromagnetic radiation is generated by the movement of charged particles in space, so at temperatures of around 800 Kelvin our eyes begin to see dim red light emitted from that object depending on its emissivity. At these temperatures the atomic vibrations are so intense that the strong acceleration and deceleration leads to the incandescent effect emitting red light. Plancks law, Wien's displacement law and the stefan boltzmann law are responsible for the shape of the function, the maximal emitted wavelength at a certain temperature and the intensity of the radiation... OK sorry this has escalated to become a lecture ;)
interesting! i see your point with IR, that makes sense. at any rate, this was a little more in the context of gases, but this is excellent supplemental information.
Sound energy make air particles to vibrate and so does solid object.. do sound have some kind of temperature? I mean will sound energy transfer faster in high temperature condition and do otherwise in lower temperature.
So everything is just vibration. When, in my cold room, I sit in front the heater, the electricity makes the coils vibrate, which makes the air vibrate, which I feel and label as heat, and eventually all the objects in the room is vibrating more, and the ice in my toilet vibrates and melts. My body likes a certain vibration frequency.
Wait. I just read the opposite definitions for temperature and heat? It said temperature was the average kinetic energy and heat is the Total potential and kinetic energy energy
I thought the heat is the ratio of randomness over highest directional pressure like 100 w laser had higher heat than 100w light bulb light so temperature is like measuring available energy while heat measuring the ratio of focus over randomness
Temperature is a proportional measure of the average translational kinetic energy of the random motions of the constituent microscopic particles in a system (such as electrons, atoms, and molecules); Wikepedia. This definition contradicts the definition in the video. Which one is right?
My definition specifically says "relates to the average kinetic energy of the molecules in the system". How are you seeing a contradiction? They are the same, mine is simply more intelligible to the average viewer.
So that means that for heat to exist there needs to be molecules, which means in an absolute vacuum, there can't be heat because there is nothing to absorb, which is why supposedly there is not much of a problem with heat in space, and this is why light(photons) could travel really far distances? Ok, and this means more dense objects have a higher warming capacity, which means it is able to absorb more, and this is why light molecules have low warming capacity/get hotter and colder faster, ok thanks for the information!
did not make the crucial difference between v^2 = temp and mv^2 = heat larger m with lower v may higher heat content than a hotter object with higher v but lower m another point to be discussed is conductance or freedom of motion of atoms and/or molecules
(2:17) "all phases of matter expand with higher temperature, whether solid, liquid, or gas" What happens with Water when it's at the freezing point? Or just above it about to freeze? Ice is less dense than water so how does that work?
That's a special condition in a substance that is a special case. Throughout the majority of water's heating from absolute zero to vapor form, it expands when adding thermal energy to the system.
You said temperature is a measure of the amount of heat available in a system . Let's apply heat energy to two steel ball bearings in a high boiling point liquid ,with one ball bearing being twice as large as the other. Now let us heat them both in the same container of fluid to the same temperature eg 100degrees C for an hour to ensure that both bearings are at the same temperature. When we dip them in parafin wax the larger ball goes deeper and has done more "work"and must contain more heat. How can your definition be correct because two items with the same temperature can do different amounts of work and does not show us the "heat"(energy) available. Is temperature not the avg kinetic motion of each (particle ) atom makes for a better definition ?
For instance, adiabatic compression. The high temperature is produced by energy added through work done on the system, rather than heat added to the system.
@@carultch thank you for your videos very helpful I got A+ grade last sem in my Modern Physics and Fluid Mechanics subjects .... You save me from h*ll hahahaha❤️😘
@@lloydbaillo I'm not the host of the videos, but I'm sure Dave appreciates it, and I'm glad his work helped you out. Congratulations on acing your classes.
If we take two molecules of a monoatomicgas in a cylinder.why they have not contain same kinetic energy.but we know they should come be In thermal equilibrium
@3:03 - the transfer of heat energy will NOT always alter the temperature of a system, such as when a phase change is occurring at a constant pressure. Very common misconception, so watch out.
Yes good point, that was a misspeak on my part.
@@ProfessorDaveExplains It's true 99% of the time we're talking about solid objects though, so I understand. Thanks for the reply!
@@ProfessorDaveExplains u can pin her comment
@@professor_m_gibbons Does that mean the heat's energy temporarily stops going into kinetic energy and instead goes into breaking bonds at the instance of phase change (with constant pressure) then switches back to affecting kinetic speed of molecules after the phase change?
One question: Isn't the expression "heat flows from" misleading and incorrect? Instead, the expressions "thermal energy flows from" or "heat flow occurs from" are actually correct, isn't it?
man,,, this dude really be saving my grades. thank you professor jesus
jesus😂😂
jesus LOL
yooo look at the top of his head!
Wtf QHAHAHAB
Hello
My Physics improved from 50% on semester test 1 to 97% on semester test 2🎉🎉
Thank you sir, I have nothing to offer. I’ll thank you properly in the future.
Excellent short and simple explanation.
i didn’t understand one single thing lmao, i guess i’m really dumb
Hello bro
My Chem. Honors teacher had me watch this video for an assignment. I was not disappointed.
I love when he says: "Let's check comprehension." I LOVE IT!
Ikr!! Like it helps me a LOT
after 10 hours I have my chemistry test and I was reading thermodynamic when I see notification of your video lol and yhea you're videos are useful
more thermo all next week!
Is that Kaneki/Haise?
your*
Man you actually explained nicely and scientifically than other videos
I have a question that has troubled me for some time (making the link between the atomic world to the macroscopic). What happens if we have a spaceship in outer space, and let’s say it’s a perfect vacuum (so no friction will occur). If we accelerate the spaceship, it now has higher velocity and so higher kinetic energy. You could say therefore it has higher temperature? After all the average kinetic energy of all the particles has increased? This doesn’t make sense though. Is temperature relative? Another similar problem, say if the earth sped up due to a gravitational force, does that mean our individual temperature increases, after all our kinetic energy has increased.
Kinetic energy is based on velocity and velocity is relative, so temperature is too.
If you accelerate an object in space relative to something else, I believe that it would count as increasing the average temperature of the system, as there would be more kinetic energy available. It would not increase the temperature of the object itself however, since relative to itself the average kinetic energy of its particles is the same.
2:22 Not all phases of matter expand with higher temperature. Water for example, is at its densest at 3.98 ⁰ C (according to the internet). Contraction upon heating in solids is called "negative thermal expansion."
Man he don't even blink
I can't unsee that now...😂
I love the explanations, thank you very much.
Any hard science concept: *exists*
Dave: *Understandable, have a great day*
i just saw the intro and was instant subscribe push!
तुला जास्त येतय का वेड्या
wtf his intro is cringe asf
thank you professor Dave- heat transfer of energy molecules - collision and friction, which phase change according to temperature manipulation.
You make life seem very interesting. Thank you for making my experiences on Earth more fun.
thank you I needed this video for my end of the year test!!! :)
"all phases of matter expand with higher temperature"
actually not always true. the density of water decreases as the temperature increases from 32F to 39F
Omg your the best! Thermochemistry is so confusing to me but your making it alot easier. I can't say thank you enough for these quick video!
teen Titans go
Can we feel temperature
ruclips.net/video/sKhcal1AbIg/видео.html
Can I say that any system has no need to transfer its energy to the other one in contact but as a natural consequence of action and reaction the energy gets distributed, eventually making the whole system reach equilibrium. Doesn't necessarily imply that energy is transferred from hot to cold and not from cold to hot it is just that the former does the transfer with a faster rate than the latter. Correct my intuition if I am wrong.
Professor Dave. You're the man!!! My Gr. 10 class finally gets it.
thanks for my completing the first question of my assignment
YOU SHOULD BE MY TEACHER!!!!!!!!
Great video and visuals. Thank you!
Follow up question:
The high specific heat capacity of water is due to strong covalent bonds of Hydrogen and Oxygen molecules INSIDE each water atom? Or, strong bonds between water molecules?
Thank you, again!
Sir you're explaining things really good
the intro is the best i have seen
*GREAT EXPLANATION* 🙏
saved my life and my science test, thank you
I ended up here after watching the first 4 videos in the "Math and Science" channel -chemistry 1. It become paid to see at the same point where Prof. Dave here pics up the topic. Thanks for not making me Pay to Learn Dave. I wanna learn for free
I rely understand Difference of Temperature and Heat. I like your explanation system. It is easy and nice.
Taking my last CSET and need to know this info. Clear ,concise and very helpful! Thank you!
Wish I had professor Dave videos during my studies, 55 years ago.
Thanks for your clarity of ideas and simple presentation
The song at the checking comprehension is so calming lol
I have a question....
If temperature measures the flow of heat then why do we not have any unit for say flow of pressure, potential,charges etc. Why only flow of heat gets a whole new SI unit
yea but is it cold
Hello Dr Dave... you explain everything in very easy way, so anyone can understand it easily...I am the first to watch and comment on this video.
If heat inherently has physical meaning when in transit, constituting its existential definition as a form of energy in motion, what does it truly mean to say that heat 'flows'? When we assert that heat is a form of energy in transit, it implies movement; however, using the term 'flow' seems to redundantly invoke the concept of movement. How can the movement of energy itself be described as 'flow' without introducing redundancy?" I created this analogy to understand what the definition is trying to say:"When we say 'heat always flows from higher to lower temperature until thermal equilibrium is reached,' it conjures an image in my mind of an invisible 'glitter glow' dispersed in the atmosphere(massless being in motion). This 'glitter glow' represents the thermal energy, and with a temperature change, it becomes unevenly distributed. In this mental model, a chunk of the glitter glow with a relatively higher distribution moves towards a lower distribution in a flow, seeking to maintain symmetry as per the Thumb Rule of the universe.The glitter glow is thermal energy and when it flows we say that it's heat
I have an assignment due next week hope similarity doesn’t go high 😅 thank you professor
@Professor Dave Explains I love all your highly educational videos that you do here on RUclips. I have a question! How come cold temperatures have a limit of around -273 C and warm temperatures can go well over 10,000 C or even can be over 1 million degrees? Please explain - THANKS.
that's absolute zero! a total absence of kinetic energy
Just like you can take away only 1 liter of water from a 1 litre beaker but you can keep adding water to it eventually leading it to overflow and you can still just add more. Atoms have a definite amount of energy so you can take away only that small amount, whereas you can give it a lot of heat but after a point its structure will be affected maybe bonds will break (in case of molecules) and after a point you will get plasma.
Temperature measure the amount of thermal energy available for work in system not heat...heat is transfer of thermal energy ( heat is a mechanism or process through which thermal energy transist)
My question is if any object having 37 celsius temp and our body has also d same then we will feel any cold or hot sensation or not
if they are at the same temperature there should be no heat transfer.
Thankyou professor dave!
this lecture was mind blowing ngl
He is the only reason I stopped hating Physics
RAISES the question, not "begs". Please. Love the videos!
1:20 faster moving particles with higher temperaure ... is correct for gasses and liquids, but not a sufficient expression and explanation for temperature changes in solids. One could misinterprete the statement and think that the atoms will vibrate more often, which is one of the most frequent misconseptions I have read about on scientific websites and forums about atomic motion. Every molecule, molecular solid or atomic solid has characteristic vibration frequencies in the range of 10^13 Hz due to their mass and force interactions. For example: If the frequency of a radiation source matches a molecules or atoms natural resonant frequency it begins to vibrate stronger, not more frequently! Now the energy of those vibrations can be transferred in solids due to whole lattice vibrations called phonons. I'm not trying to give a lecture here. But its such a common misconception that people say if you heat stuff, the frequency of the atomic vibrations increase, which is absolutely NOT true. It's the amplitude of the vibrations that gets larger. Of course this explanation was viewed at with classical mechanics, quantummechanically everything has to do with probability waves and distributions... but the probability of finding a particle will shift towards a higher distance if we give the system more energy. If you look at the asymmetric potential curve you get the idea... The frequency of atomic oscillations simply do not change, otherwise IR-Spectroscopy would not work, as peaks would shift around all the time being a strongly temperature dependant measurement method, which it is not! One thing you can get is overtones of vibrations at higher temperatures... The frequencies which change will eventually be those of the whole macroscopic lattice due to thermal expansion and changes in the elastic modulus of the solid.
I think why most people think that atoms change their vibration frequencies is due to incandescence... simply speaking if the amplitude of a vibrating system increases but the vibration frequency stays the same, the particles have to travel a longer distance in the same amount of oscillations. Thus ultimately your statement is correct that the particles have to move faster. Faster moving particles means that more energy is involved... Electromagnetic radiation is generated by the movement of charged particles in space, so at temperatures of around 800 Kelvin our eyes begin to see dim red light emitted from that object depending on its emissivity. At these temperatures the atomic vibrations are so intense that the strong acceleration and deceleration leads to the incandescent effect emitting red light. Plancks law, Wien's displacement law and the stefan boltzmann law are responsible for the shape of the function, the maximal emitted wavelength at a certain temperature and the intensity of the radiation... OK sorry this has escalated to become a lecture ;)
interesting! i see your point with IR, that makes sense. at any rate, this was a little more in the context of gases, but this is excellent supplemental information.
thanks :)
Sound energy make air particles to vibrate and so does solid object.. do sound have some kind of temperature? I mean will sound energy transfer faster in high temperature condition and do otherwise in lower temperature.
That has to be the longest RUclips comment I've seen - and not read.
Praveen M the longest “ useful “ youtube comment I have ever seen.. u should read it
professor Dave is not a professor his genius in explaining
Thank you so much Dave Grohl \m/
So everything is just vibration. When, in my cold room, I sit in front the heater, the electricity makes the coils vibrate, which makes the air vibrate, which I feel and label as heat, and eventually all the objects in the room is vibrating more, and the ice in my toilet vibrates and melts. My body likes a certain vibration frequency.
Please explain "work in a system", This is the only part I don't understand what means 🙂
When two objects or things are in thermal equilibrium, are their molecules vibrating or moving at the same speeds due to same temp?
re 2:30 Not "all" but "generally"; but I'm sure he knows that there are exceptions for some crystalline solids.
Is heat the reason for motion of molecules/is the motion of molecules the reason for heat?
All of your videos are very very very very nice....
Will you make a video on how infrared radiation increases kinetic energy of particles
Professor Dave is the Oversimplified of science, change my mind
Who else had a teacher who made you type the URL
thought i was the only one
yup
I love your lectures 😍
POV: Rory Fenelon and Melissa Gibbons
Do you have a foot fetish
The covalent bond stretching and bending is an example of potential but not kinetic energy, am I right?
I love you man, you are brilliant
what is the differnce between work done on the system and work done by the system
Is pressure and intensity or decibel and compression of space elasticity
You have no indeed explained it very well sir
You're the man dave
Wait. I just read the opposite definitions for temperature and heat? It said temperature was the average kinetic energy and heat is the Total potential and kinetic energy energy
@1:07 temperature is not the measure of heat energy available for work in a system
UR THE BEST!
you are!
hi professor dave ,i have one question,if temperature is nothing but kinetic energy why is it considered a base quantity
I thought the heat is the ratio of randomness over highest directional pressure like 100 w laser had higher heat than 100w light bulb light so temperature is like measuring available energy while heat measuring the ratio of focus over randomness
I love you Professor Dave
Hi I m from India learning from u
thankful for your lecture
Temperature is a proportional measure of the average translational kinetic energy of the random motions of the constituent microscopic particles in a system (such as electrons, atoms, and molecules); Wikepedia. This definition contradicts the definition in the video. Which one is right?
My definition specifically says "relates to the average kinetic energy of the molecules in the system". How are you seeing a contradiction? They are the same, mine is simply more intelligible to the average viewer.
So that means that for heat to exist there needs to be molecules, which means in an absolute vacuum, there can't be heat because there is nothing to absorb, which is why supposedly there is not much of a problem with heat in space, and this is why light(photons) could travel really far distances? Ok, and this means more dense objects have a higher warming capacity, which means it is able to absorb more, and this is why light molecules have low warming capacity/get hotter and colder faster, ok thanks for the information!
Is it better to use High/Low than More/Less kinetic energy in 4:00?
eh, either way!
Why gases lose its heat while moving from high pressure to low pressure
Outstanding explaination sir
Professor Dave! Thank you!
so long suker
hey
I went from score 19 to 41 ty
did not make the crucial difference between v^2 = temp and mv^2 = heat
larger m with lower v may higher heat content than a hotter object with higher v but lower m
another point to be discussed is conductance or freedom of motion of atoms and/or molecules
(2:17) "all phases of matter expand with higher temperature, whether solid, liquid, or gas"
What happens with Water when it's at the freezing point? Or just above it about to freeze? Ice is less dense than water so how does that work?
That's a special condition in a substance that is a special case. Throughout the majority of water's heating from absolute zero to vapor form, it expands when adding thermal energy to the system.
who here cause of a school lesson
😂me
Explain to me the process by which temperature (the average kinetic energy of molecules/atoms) converts into thermal radiation over time.
U da man, dave!!
You said temperature is a measure of the amount of heat available in a system . Let's apply heat energy to two steel ball bearings in a high boiling point liquid ,with one ball bearing being twice as large as the other. Now let us heat them both in the same container of fluid to the same temperature eg 100degrees C for an hour to ensure that both bearings are at the same temperature. When we dip them in parafin wax the larger ball goes deeper and has done more "work"and must contain more heat. How can your definition be correct because two items with the same temperature can do different amounts of work and does not show us the "heat"(energy) available. Is temperature not the avg kinetic motion of each (particle ) atom makes for a better definition ?
I'm confused why watt over meter kelvin is used for thermal transfer
i like very to the point and easy to understand :D
Sovle the Venn diagram heat and temperature
not all phases of matter expand when heat it, for expample rubber band contracts!
Thank you Dave!
Love the explanation👍👍👍
Great Video! very useful as a resource material
Great explanation!
when is high temperature not accompanied by heat?
For instance, adiabatic compression. The high temperature is produced by energy added through work done on the system, rather than heat added to the system.
@@carultch thank you for your videos very helpful I got A+ grade last sem in my Modern Physics and Fluid Mechanics subjects .... You save me from h*ll hahahaha❤️😘
@@lloydbaillo I'm not the host of the videos, but I'm sure Dave appreciates it, and I'm glad his work helped you out. Congratulations on acing your classes.
Sir ur just awesome sir ur the best sir
If we take two molecules of a monoatomicgas in a cylinder.why they have not contain same kinetic energy.but we know they should come be In thermal equilibrium
Try to teach inter syllabus sir
Thanks