The Amazing Ways Animals See the World
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024
- Animal eyes come in the most spectacular range of styles, shapes, and sizes. There are eyes with lenses made of rock, eyes that can look up and down at the same time, and eyes that can spot prey from a mile away. But one animal has the most incredible-and certainly the strangest-eyes of them all.
Subscribe to The Atlantic on RUclips: bit.ly/subAtlan...
I could watch this kind of videos all day
the rainbow mantis shrimp: story: in 7th grade on a school field trip some kid saw one poked it and broke his finger.
Isabelle Zimmerman wow legendary
nature is so incredible and amazing..
One of my favorite animals!!!
I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.
Pigs are great animals. They're clever. The little teacup porkers are wretchedly adorable and any animal that can give us bacon truly is a wonderful and magical beast.
Since pigs ‘can’t’ look up to you
Awesome video. And the mantis shrimp is my favorite animal!
this is a fascinating video.
...but, I wish I understood why spider eyes scare me so much ☹️
Blanche's Lesbian Lover Because you are a lesbian lover...? 😂
"eye" really got en"light"ened
Keep making these videos!
Extraordinary! Very lovely video GREAT JOB
Great video:)
great video
Mantis Shrimp don't discriminate colours because they're not racist!
Oof
Interesting. I always wondered how mantis shrimp saw the world. I was aware they had more cones than us and were able to see into the infrared and ultraviolet but wasn't aware that in terms of colors we actually saw more.. or saw them differently. After all we can't see some of the colors they do beyond red and violet but we can see some shades in between that they are effectively blind to.
You'd think a video about sight would be filmed in focus :p
For those different color shades, were they using pigments whose dominant wavelengths were a tiny bit different, or color approximations made for human vision? Because I'd bet red + green does not equal yellow for that shrimp.
Most likely they're actually seeing yellow instead of whatever we call yellow which is halfway between green and red. But while they are able to see into the infra-red and ultraviolet, the individual shades they can make out is less than what we can.
With pigments you can't combine other colors to make yellow, that's color theory 101, that's why it's called a primary color. If you combine red and green you get brown
How do scientists know all of this?
Experiments, lots and lots of testing and taking copious notes.
Indra Vargas cuz they're smart infact the time they wasted learning is information i spent learning which there to use
Magic bam
Not really a waste than, is it.
Scientist dont waste 30 hours per week watching television. They most likely dont spend their entire free time watching RUclips or playing video games.
They spend their time studying, reading, and experimenting. Of course, thats an assumption of mine, so take it with a grain of salt. I would expect scientist to be determined in their work to the point where they would keep working at home.
Some Scientist's work are extremely important to themselves, maybe they work in Cancer Research and 2 of their close family members have Cancer, that would make someone really motivated to overwork I would assume.
I would imagine Scientist have only one field of expertise. Like most lawyers. They probably chose that area themselves, something they were passionate about, therefore, something they might want to do on their free time. Scientist are usually very intelligent and hard working, a life of studying and school, and of dedicated work.
Combine with the huge amount of hours ( I would imagine ), maybe, spend entire nights up, and try to solve problems for days on end, make it that they can eventually come to a reasonable conclusion of whats going on.
A lot of the time, those conclusion are mere theories, made of what is available to us at the moment, wich is why a lot of scientific work has been proven to be false as times goes by.
Just like history books.
Wow
Bet that Mantis Shrimp didn't see that Thai chef coming in
Hi bill and thank you for letting us out for a visit with us last week for the next week of June madness for our year of March and our anniversary and we Ty to our beach day and then tyyy our year old we have to celebrate with her and we are going on a cruise to our house our way back home to see our family you guys try and you thinking that too soon oily but it’s okay to see what we have but it was a wonderful trip we are doing so good
very human of us to think theyre the ones seeing "wrong" and not us... even though they have about 5 times more cones than us
humans using human tests will only give you human results.
سبحان الله
Serious answer please, what do you call jobs like these that look into the study of animals to find out more about them?? What are the career choices for this ?
Research Biologist. It is a very varied field, essentially covering research of all living beings. The trick is getting enough experience to get a research grant, before that they usually work at universities, large companies, or on someone else's team.
Thank you
It was good but we are not all working
E-NUN-CI-A-TION
Mantis Shrimp have 12 cone cells? .... In another video , I heard they have 16 cones .........
Do scientist test the IQ of Mantis Shrimp before making them to distinguish the color? Maybe they are just dumb so that they don't even notice the reward mechanism.
YALL IM ACTUALLY SO COOKED RIGHT NOW, I DONT GET THIS VIDEO AT ALL AND I NEED TO ANSWER A BUNCH OF WUESRION ABIUT THIS, ITS 8 PM RN AND MY HW IS DUE TOMORROW. PLEASE HELP ME ANSWER THESE
What is the claim the narrator makes?
what are 3 pieces of evidence for his claim?
What is the reasoning for his claim? (How does he unite the claim with the evidence he provided?)
Lastly, what are 3 ways mantis shrimp are amazing?
Add subtitles editor
Nice ears.
العرب يعملوا لايك
They see in light only so the rest of the video is assumptions
29th
Proof it
Shrimps
The video is good, BUT. Could you please talk abet faster, you kinda sound condescending.
We need more Hot Asians Guys in media!.!. Lol!.!.
His voice tho...
He says "that we cant see" then how the f*ck did you explain and know the name
They're fucking shrimp though. We dont even know if they have the capacity to learn, much less understand the abstract idea of tapping the correct colors.
First of all, it’s not EEEEvolution
His face doesn’t match his voice 😂
The least is to talk about vision with such fantastic ears. Can't stop staring at them ! I'd like to laugh but i fear he could hear me.
Natural selection could not have produced this variety bc it's a system that eliminates. The process is going to reduce the variety not add
Peaton You are missing the aspect of genetic mutation. Most mutations are bad, but nevertheless, there is the occasional mutation that improves the species. Diversity is the result of millions of mutations on a span of billions of years.
I suggest you study physics and engineering. Clearly animals have evolved over time to optimize their eyesight in different ways. A fish, for example, has a very different set of requirements than a bird. Same for a nocturnal animal versus one that hunts during the day. Add the concepts of random genetic mutations that are occurring over the timeframe of any particular species and it becomes easy to see how life has evolved so wonderfully different. It's quite sublime, really.
it reduces in terms of a single population, but not necessarily across species. if you have one population that splits into two and migrates over time to two different environments, natural selection could favor different traits in each population. over time, this could result in two different species or subspecies. so natural selection can actually result in more diversity. hopefully that makes sense.
+Peaton You have no idea what you're talking about. Mutations can be good, bad or neutral. There is no system that "eliminates" especially if you're using this in conjunction with the concept of "information". All this is is a lot of tiny little steps adding up to large changes.
Think of a journey of a mile. Think of how you're going to get from point A to point B just by walking. Each step takes you closer to your goal but individually they're insignificant. It's only when looked at the journey do you see how they all add up. Does that make any sense?
Mutation can be either *detrimental* (decreases organism's chances of survival and reproduction), *advantageous* (increases organism's chances for survival and reproduction) and *neutral* (doesn't increase or decrease either). Now, natural selection eliminates organisms with detrimental mutations, specially if they are in competition with other organisms bearing traits with slightly better chances of survival/reproduction, diminishing the occurrence of detrimental mutations and amplifying the occurrence of advantageous ones.
So, it's wrong to say that natural selection is _«a system that_ [only] _eliminates»._ Natural selection does not only acts by elimination, it *also* favors the advantageous mutations to become widespread, and therefore become the basis of even more advantageous mutations over the top of previous ones; this last mentioned operation is the cause of the ever-increasing complexity of biological species on Earth (and every other planet or plausible environment out there).