Ya that’s the thing with gen 9 Ou. If you possibly ban one the other becomes broken. I think gliscor should go if kyurem is banned personally but let’s see whe the voters choose
@@CasioPrav33nI disagree, I don’t think kyurem is what’s keeping gliscor in check, it’s definitely possible it could be broken if Waterpon is banned as well, but it still has a lot of checks in the tier aside from those, and it’s not like we can know what will be broken after a ban so you kinda just have to ban what’s broken and keep moving down the line
@@N279 You make a good point about Waterpon and Primarina being checks, but Gliscor was banned even when Waterpon was in the tier last December. If Kyurem gets banned, we could see Gliscor dominating again. Despite Kyurem's weaknesses, it helps keep Gliscor and similar threats in check with its offensive pressure. Without Kyurem, the meta might shift back to being too Gliscor-heavy, similar to before the ban. The biggest promblem is the SD set rn.
Worried about kyurem when zama and ogerpon running around
Ya that’s the thing with gen 9 Ou. If you possibly ban one the other becomes broken. I think gliscor should go if kyurem is banned personally but let’s see whe the voters choose
@@CasioPrav33nI disagree, I don’t think kyurem is what’s keeping gliscor in check, it’s definitely possible it could be broken if Waterpon is banned as well, but it still has a lot of checks in the tier aside from those, and it’s not like we can know what will be broken after a ban so you kinda just have to ban what’s broken and keep moving down the line
@@N279 You make a good point about Waterpon and Primarina being checks, but Gliscor was banned even when Waterpon was in the tier last December. If Kyurem gets banned, we could see Gliscor dominating again. Despite Kyurem's weaknesses, it helps keep Gliscor and similar threats in check with its offensive pressure. Without Kyurem, the meta might shift back to being too Gliscor-heavy, similar to before the ban. The biggest promblem is the SD set rn.