I like 2. and 3. but I completely don`t agree with ranked arams unless you permitted everyone to have all the champions unlocked and forbid any premades. Having an account with 30 champs you play well gives an "unfair advantage" over a person with 160 champs to their (nick)name. Constant 5v5 with premade voice chat is also much more better than mute randoms. It`s just easier to coordinate abilities via voice that pings/intuition, so that`s also an unfair advantage. I think, all RANDOM all mid should have the more randomness added to it e.g. hp relics giving other buffs later in the game, or some teleports appearing to the arenas (like the 1v1 you mentioned) where you try to kill an epic monster whilst fighting enemy team at the same time.
I believe that there are 64 free champions in ARAM that anyone can get. Also, the lack of communication between non-premades is a general problem in League, but we still have SR ranked despite of it, so I dont see the problem
The only interesting idea is the third. First is trash because it take out the fun from ARAM. A game where there is ranked means sweaty enemies and allies. Ranked ARAM is bad. 1v1 arena is bad too, how the fuck do u implement that? timer like the FF button? no way to implement that. Like I said, Ranked ARAM is the worst thing they can bring to aram.
Interesting reasonings. I literally gave a way to implement the second idea, you must have just skipped past it, but I'm still amazed how you found the second one harder to implement than the third one :D
@@shadam_free because with the second one u can just spam "duel", or everyone will go and have a duel and nobody will be on the normal map, it will be really hard to balance because every champion got balance buffs on aram which makes them stronger or weaker than usually on SR. Sona is the worst champ u can play on ARAM because she is the weakest. It will be a hell to balance that when they can't even balance SR properly. They will have to make lore for that Arena, cause there is no way they just implement it without logic behind it.
@@minigamit Here are some easy ways to solve that problem: The challange has a cooldown per person. Only one duel can be initiated at a time (which I thought was obvious), and another thing that I thought was obvious, is that its a question of choice :D If you play Sona and a Zed challenges you to a duel, you will obviously not accept, and a Zed player would know this as well, so they would challenge someone they think would accept it. Your lack of creativity is the issue here, buddy :D
Игры
My idea is the ability to disable heath in aram private.
I like the 1v1 idea, btw good wideo bro, keep it up
WEEEEWWWOOOOWWEEEWOOOO RAJJOOOOTTTT
MAKE THIS VIDEO FAMOUS TO WATCH IT RIOT ITSELF FOR MAYBE AT LEAST RANKED ARAM GAMES LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I like 2. and 3. but I completely don`t agree with ranked arams unless you permitted everyone to have all the champions unlocked and forbid any premades. Having an account with 30 champs you play well gives an "unfair advantage" over a person with 160 champs to their (nick)name. Constant 5v5 with premade voice chat is also much more better than mute randoms. It`s just easier to coordinate abilities via voice that pings/intuition, so that`s also an unfair advantage.
I think, all RANDOM all mid should have the more randomness added to it e.g. hp relics giving other buffs later in the game, or some teleports appearing to the arenas (like the 1v1 you mentioned) where you try to kill an epic monster whilst fighting enemy team at the same time.
I believe that there are 64 free champions in ARAM that anyone can get.
Also, the lack of communication between non-premades is a general problem in League, but we still have SR ranked despite of it, so I dont see the problem
@@shadam_free that's true, I did not know about the free aram rooster! Thanks for the lesson :)
Remove exhaust
The only interesting idea is the third. First is trash because it take out the fun from ARAM. A game where there is ranked means sweaty enemies and allies. Ranked ARAM is bad.
1v1 arena is bad too, how the fuck do u implement that? timer like the FF button? no way to implement that.
Like I said, Ranked ARAM is the worst thing they can bring to aram.
Interesting reasonings. I literally gave a way to implement the second idea, you must have just skipped past it, but I'm still amazed how you found the second one harder to implement than the third one :D
@@shadam_free because with the second one u can just spam "duel", or everyone will go and have a duel and nobody will be on the normal map, it will be really hard to balance because every champion got balance buffs on aram which makes them stronger or weaker than usually on SR. Sona is the worst champ u can play on ARAM because she is the weakest. It will be a hell to balance that when they can't even balance SR properly. They will have to make lore for that Arena, cause there is no way they just implement it without logic behind it.
@@minigamit Here are some easy ways to solve that problem: The challange has a cooldown per person. Only one duel can be initiated at a time (which I thought was obvious), and another thing that I thought was obvious, is that its a question of choice :D If you play Sona and a Zed challenges you to a duel, you will obviously not accept, and a Zed player would know this as well, so they would challenge someone they think would accept it. Your lack of creativity is the issue here, buddy :D