That score is actually pretty good. According to the Puget website, a laptop with an 11th Gen Core i7-11800H @ 2.30GHz, 16GBs RAM, and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 recently scored 525.
If you want a laptop, absolutely. The battery is insanely good, I was using AE, exporting video, creating thumbnails in Photoshop and also browsing on Chrome and it lasted more than 6 hours.Performance of AE is good if you don't have too many effects but, If you are a heavy user I would definitely get the 32GB RAM version. 16GB is decent but AE is using so much RAM! Maybe the M1 native version will be better optimized because DaVinci Resolve for example performs much better than AE on the same configuration.
@@aksndrv Thank you so much for your inputs. I am not a heavy user of effects, but need good performance with character rigging. So was wondering if it will be good.
Thanks so much for doing this. It’s really helpful. Can you run the project from the first video in M1 Beta to compare performance to Rosetta? I don’t think there was an C4D in that.
Glad you liked it! I am currently working on a video between M1 native beta and Rosetta but as I said in this video, I can't test C4D because the Beta version of After Effects does not support currently C4D. I hope it will be updated soon.
Video about that is in progress. No Puget Benchmark whatsoever because the M1 native version of After Effects is still in Beta and it cannot support yet some plugins that Puget needs in order to run the test
Hi Aleksander... you are the best! Thanks a bunch for these videos. Can you verify whether or not you had the multi-frame rendering option turned on for this and your last video? :)
Hi David, thanks a lot! Yes, multi-frame rendering was enabled the entire time (you could also tell it was enabled by looking closely on the progress bar. You could see there were 3 colors : blue, which represents the exported frames, dark green, which represents frames ready to be exported or already cached, and light green, frames currently rendering)
I think they did update the benchmark recently, hence why these numbers need to be compared with others on their website with caution: "Note that we are using the updated 0.95 version of our benchmark, which has updated testing to account for multi-frame rendering and as such, the results are not comparable to previous versions of the benchmark."
Привет, у тебя есть примерные сравнения одного и того же проекта на m1 pro и windows pc? Ты просто показываешь тесты, но сравнений нет, сложно понять насколько он лучше в этих ситуациях И как с плагинами обстоят дела? Все ли плагины ставятся и работают?
![I Replaced ALL my ADOBE APPS with these [free or cheaper] Alternatives!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5EfqHg49kMk/mqdefault.jpg)
That score is actually pretty good.
According to the Puget website, a laptop with an 11th Gen Core i7-11800H @ 2.30GHz, 16GBs RAM, and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 recently scored 525.
Yeah that's what I've also seen. The specs are good but AE is eating too much RAM so it is what it is.
Do you personally feel its worth the money? Is the performance good for you when you work on your projects and feel good?
If you want a laptop, absolutely. The battery is insanely good, I was using AE, exporting video, creating thumbnails in Photoshop and also browsing on Chrome and it lasted more than 6 hours.Performance of AE is good if you don't have too many effects but, If you are a heavy user I would definitely get the 32GB RAM version. 16GB is decent but AE is using so much RAM! Maybe the M1 native version will be better optimized because DaVinci Resolve for example performs much better than AE on the same configuration.
@@aksndrv Thank you so much for your inputs. I am not a heavy user of effects, but need good performance with character rigging. So was wondering if it will be good.
Thanks so much for doing this. It’s really helpful. Can you run the project from the first video in M1 Beta to compare performance to Rosetta? I don’t think there was an C4D in that.
Glad you liked it! I am currently working on a video between M1 native beta and Rosetta but as I said in this video, I can't test C4D because the Beta version of After Effects does not support currently C4D. I hope it will be updated soon.
Please do video on native after effects
Video about that is in progress. No Puget Benchmark whatsoever because the M1 native version of After Effects is still in Beta and it cannot support yet some plugins that Puget needs in order to run the test
Thanks for this video Aleksander
No problem Direk, thanks for watching
Hi Aleksander... you are the best! Thanks a bunch for these videos. Can you verify whether or not you had the multi-frame rendering option turned on for this and your last video? :)
Hi David, thanks a lot! Yes, multi-frame rendering was enabled the entire time (you could also tell it was enabled by looking closely on the progress bar. You could see there were 3 colors : blue, which represents the exported frames, dark green, which represents frames ready to be exported or already cached, and light green, frames currently rendering)
I think they did update the benchmark recently, hence why these numbers need to be compared with others on their website with caution: "Note that we are using the updated 0.95 version of our benchmark, which has updated testing to account for multi-frame rendering and as such, the results are not comparable to previous versions of the benchmark."
Hi! Can you PLEASE RUN Pugent test with DaVinci Resolve? Much love from Croatia!
Unfortunately Puget Benchmark with DaVinci Resolve is only working on Windows :(
Привет, у тебя есть примерные сравнения одного и того же проекта на m1 pro и windows pc?
Ты просто показываешь тесты, но сравнений нет, сложно понять насколько он лучше в этих ситуациях
И как с плагинами обстоят дела? Все ли плагины ставятся и работают?
Hey bro this great! Can you do this with premiere pro?
Yes of course! Video coming in a few days :)
@@aksndrv thaks bro, I subbed
Thanks for the Video Alek
No worries! :)