This genius of a man , this Jesuit priest is the one who actually turned my head to pay attention to on a couch 5-6 years ago as I was laying in my misery from Cancer treatments at my home. Not the treatments but the attempt at resting or just laying in despair and depression and anxiety and PTSD unable to hardly move an inch. Because of this priest I very slowly began dragging my feet back to a semblance of Catholicism. He is blind , brilliant, I love him and pray when I remember for him that he led me back.
Great testimonial , Mimi. God is Alive. God is Love. Jesus was sent to Earth as a baby to show the rest of us humans, the beloved creature of God's creation, how to behave, live in service to others and in a living and loving relationship with God. That Jesus is considered the Son of God the Father with the Love between the Father and the Son being the manifestation of the Holy Spirit , or the Paraclete as Jesus declared would be sent to carry mankind forward after Jesus would no longer be with His 12 apostles, we have the three persons of the Holy Trinity. The encouragement, love and hope you felt listening to Fr. Spritzer was the Comforter. That is one of the manifestations of the Holy Spirit, the love of God. You were open to it so you were graced with it. People make it so hard to believe because we are all affected by satan's blight to mankind. Those baptized are given the graces to fight against the evil but often fail. Just get back up again. That is all you need to do. Just like Mimi was open to. Seek forgiveness and repentance for not following the best path you knew to follow, and start to experience the peace and contentment that Mimi finally did. It is never too late to turn to the One God who created the universe. Repent and believe in the Lamb of God who died to take away the sins of the world, Jesus Christ. He existed in history. He was born, walked with His chosen 12, allowed himself to be crucified, died was laid in a tomb on a Friday and rose from the grave on Easter Sunday morning. He was the Jewish born Messiah for All of Mankind. That's ALL God asks so little of us. All the unbelief, questioning, confusion, doubting is of the evil one. Bottom line: quit running away and instead run toward the God who made you and wants nothing more than your recognition that you belong to someone who loves you more than you can imagine. If you turn toward God and pray for guidance, watch out. Because you will get a good response!! One last thing to consider that can change how you think of everything: if it is good, it is of God because God is all good. God does Not Cause bad to happen. But He does allow it so He can allow some good to come out of it. ex: illness and dis-ease is not from God. It is a result of the first man's fall from grace. From the result of evil . But God allows illness for a greater good to come from it. Perhaps for Mimi that greater good was the revelation finally understood due to 10:54 Fr. Spitzer's uncanny brains, whit and unwavering faith and conviction that bubbles over because such joy cannot be contained. Fr. Spritzer is a rare breed that sees his challenges even as a gift from God. He has give.his life to serve Jesus Christ as fully as possible. He is smart, insightful, effective in his explanations and research and writings. I imagine he will have a very comfortable reward in heaven one day. He is one of those pretty certain to hear "Welcome my good and faithful servant!" Let's just hope it is not for a long time to come. We need Shepards like Fr. Spritzer here below.
It happened 4 decades ago in a premier research institute in India. The presentation was about the breakthrough in nuclear medicine. The speaker differentiated x-ray from nuclear medicine stating that while the former gave the structural image the later gave a functional image. I was only a student among the audience of top scientists. During the QA session I asked if it can be used to detect what happens when a person dies. The audience and the speaker brushed aside my question with a laughter. I sank in shame. After 40 years, fully detached from science, Fr.Spitzer is making me happy. Thanks.
Thank you for enduring the Shame you felt ....trust me you have no reason to be shameful ....the people who laughed at you are very similar to those who laughed at Noah
If you are here. You are here for a reason! JESUS is king. Awesome doesn't even touch his Glory.if you seek him you will find him. He is that good. JESUS loves you! He will change your life. trust him. THANK YOU JESUS for being my SAVIOR. I LOVE YOU JESUS. you are my king❤
Christians boast their lack of quality-control. The same god we know for a perfect record of doing nothing, is their servant for an unmeasurable number of prayers. Why would anyone confess Jesus Christ as Lord, when voting is a quality-control? Republicans rig the voting districts. The SCOTUS writes of its own stench. Christians are avoided like the old woman with too many cats, suggesting we travel best with one foot in fantasyland, based on butchered context in Roman propaganda. Who do you think licensed temples, controlled publication, crucified when imperial Rome created Christians? Why do you think every Alex Jones in the country, uses Jesus-lingo in the sales-pitch? The problem is; We depend on the fiction of government being better than no government, actually working, with voting as a quality-control. Christians boast having no quality-control. The same god we know for a perfect record of doing nothing, is their servant for an unmeasurable number of prayers. The only difference between a Republican & Democrat is how fast the knee hits the floor when a donor walks in the room. There is no plan, not for greenhouse gases, as long as energy is needed to keep the show on the road. Christians demand ownership of the narrative: We are all gods, children of the highest god. The ultimate vanity is declared, as they make a scene in the temple. Christians are the wolves in sheep's clothing, weighing in on whatnot as if Earth had gravity-free zones, would-be dictators suggesting we must all travel together, as if we all prefer leadership with one foot in fantasyland. We know a tree by the fruit. We know a man by his works. We thank God secular law & order finally ended the witch-killings & inquisitions.
"If you are here. You are here for a reason! " The reason I am here is because the video is titled "The Latest Scientific Evidence of God". Ignoring the fact that "The Latest Scientific Evidence of God" makes no sense because so far no scientific evidence for god has been shown, I watched to see if ANY scientific evidence for god is presented here. None is.
@@TdBone They think this improves God sales, having scientific evidence for characters only known from fiction, as if a deity who can't get everyone's attention, is worthy of the Divine title.
@@cnault3244 Scientism is such a drag, and completely devoid of the more appropriate philosophical treatment of God's existence. What do you want, for God to pop down and pose for a photograph? To say 'cheese' for you and your godless pals before heading back up to heaven?
@@AntUasalÓNiadh Why not? According to the Bible, god talks to numerous people, or pops down to see them, or wrestles with them ( god lost btw), or has them over for dinner. Let's assume the discussion was about the existence of leprechauns and rephrase your question so you can see how stupid your post was: Scientism is such a drag, and completely devoid of the more appropriate philosophical treatment of leprechauns' existence. What do you want, for a leprechaun to pop over and pose for a photograph? To say 'cheese' for you and your pals before heading back to their pot of gold? The fact is I said NOTHING about scientific evidence for god. Evidence for something does not have to be scientific. Now, what is your BEST evidence for god?
You can tell how giddy and excited he gets simply talking about this stuff. He's super into it like a little kid, tripping over his words and sometimes stuttering. THIS guy BELIEVES
Fr Spitzer has a contagious enthusiasm! The YT logarithm kindly sent me his lecture on the Turin Shroud; I had never really doubted it - but the evidence presented so engagingly by Fr S was like music to my ears! I thank Our Lord for giving us a glimpse of His Holy Face. Makes me cry. 🙏❤️🙏
@Tbone pretty lonely soul...huh? Stay healthy for the rest of your life. Denying God is eternity in hell, that's a long long time. Now be a good boy and take the garbage out like your mommy asked and do something constructive with yourself like, get a job.
I’ve always believed that science was proof of God’s brilliance and that the beauty of the cosmos and everything within it was an expression of God’s perfect love. I’m glad Father Spitzer provided the evidence to back it up. The truth shall prevail!
The magis center where this man is getting his statistics from is a highly biased Christion organization. Science does not point to God. Don't believe me? Go ask any real scientist.
@@kalords5967 “There are two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle.” - Albert Einstein
Praise God there are younger scientists that believe in God! Hopefully that will continue to grow and spread to the general population! Love Fr. Spitzer, and have enjoyed my first Majis Center Catholic Women’s Bible study!
@irishmclass2042, Unfortunately, the world media is totally against God. They withhold gems of information of discoveries about the most astonishing facts already in the Bible. We can only rely on experts like Fr. Spitzer to spread the newfound realities of the Holy Book in Archeology , Science, and with the help of technology. As you say, our hope for the future lies in young scientists-to-be and a revival.
@@hoponpop3330 "One of" as if the existence of your mythagog did anything done make another evidential excuses for your tyrannical deity, mythelot. Watch it again on a lense of a outsider of such faith and you'll see how deceptive it is...
@@hoponpop3330 Yep, but the problem with that story is that when Thomas asked for empirical evidence he was provided it. Today however when an atheist asks for empirical evidence of the truth of 1 Corinthians 15: 14 all you get is apologetic excuses.
Thank you Fr Spitzer for a very interesting presentation. We now know that atheism is based purely on faith. A blind belief that God does not exist, for which there is absolutely no evidence. We can safely deduct that if there was any proof that God does not exist it would have been shoved up our throats in every school for decades! Around 16min 50sec you showed us a slide ''Peer-reviewed medical studies of a transcendent soul'' stating, ''that peer-reviewed studies show the high likelihood that we have a transcendent soul capable of surviving bodily death.'' A question: Who is the ''we'' (that has/possesses the soul) that the slide/research refers to? Am I the body that has a transcendent soul? Or, maybe, I am the eternal, transcendent soul? A particle of undying spirit in a temporary body? My material body is subject to death, that's obvious, but once the body is gone (buried, eaten by worms, cremated etc) who owns the soul? Maybe a different question: Who am I? Am I the body or am I the soul? Logic points to the latter, I think. We commonly say: my legs, my hands & my body. I cannot be my body having an eternal soul inside because during an NDE, when my soul gets out of my body and then I look at my body.... Who is doing the looking? My soul, my body... but who owns my soul and my body? Using logic I conclude that I AM the soul and I have a body. I, the soul, am looking at my body during an NDE, I think. But please feel free to accept the version that fits you. Thank you for your attention. God bless you. Salaam Aleikum. Sat Sri Akaal. Hare Krishna. Namaskar.
Fantastic! It is fulfilling for me to hear that, before his death, Dr. Hawkins was able to see the glory of God in His infinite creation of the Universe that He, Himself created by His supreme intelligence and flawless architecture. And praise God for humans to have a soul and that is manifested in Science at the moment of death, and in life, by Jesus Christ.
@@espojespo5 I am not going to argue with you. Your religion is atheism, mine is Christianity. Think how you like but allow me to think like great minds such as Isaac Newton, Hobble, Boyle, Lavoisier, to cite just a few. So, I am in good company.
“And the Good News about the Kingdom will be preached throughout the whole world, so that all nations will hear it; and then the end will come. (MTHW 24:14).”
A question to all?? I’m Looking forward to an intelligent reply.?? Moved by lust at the sight of her, King David called for Bathsheba to be brought to him and slept with her. David committed adultery with a married woman called Bathsheba, wife of Uriah. what's more, David murdered Uriah by proxy by ordering all of Uriah's comrades to abandon him in the midst of battle, so that he ended up getting killed by an opposing army. The Prophet Nathan was sent by God and warned King David. well, Torah verses clearly say that both URIAH and DAVID Blessed by GOD. Well, the question is, if Uriah, David and Bathsheba go to heaven. To whom will Bathsheba be given? This question is ready to test the wisdom of all of you: The Bible [ Torah]: God promised that God had already chosen all three humans for heaven: David, Uriah and Bathsheba. I’m Looking forward to an intelligent reply. Note: God said through Nathan the prophet that King David was rich. Uriah was poor and had nothing but Bathsheba, a little lamb. Therefore, God here assured that the couple was chosen through the parable. David's prayer sought forgiveness and Later King David has been forgiven too. no doubt all three will go to heaven. If So, to whom will Bathsheba be given? Note: Matthew 22/23-30: There will be no right answer. The question raised by the Sadducees was about the impossible situation of a widow having seven husbands, all brothers. If Abraham goes to heaven, Sarah will be his wife in heaven. just as Mary will be Joseph's wife. Matthew 22:23-33/ It has a different meaning. You and your spouse love each other, live together on earth, and are true believers in Christ. If they go to heaven, they don't need to remarry. They don't need to create new babies.
@@bitmasricco5699 I think a much bigger question is this: according to God's supposedly perfect law, David was guilty of two capital crimes. Bathsheba is either rape victim or guilty of one capital crime (adultery) - we don't know since, like most women in the bible, her views don't matter. The only certainly innocent party is the baby she gives birth to. The outcome? David goes on to be Israel's great king and the model for the coming messiah. Bathsheba goes on to be queen mother. The baby gets executed by slow torture. The question is: what does this say about the justice of God?
@@njhoepner well said, Ok! come to the question is: if Uriah, David and Bathsheba go to heaven. To whom will Bathsheba be given? Note : Every reference to angels in Scripture is in the masculine gender. Angels are never referred to in any gender other than masculine. • In Matthew 22:30 Jesus says that there will be no marriage in heaven because we “will be like the angels in heaven.” This verse states that angels do not marry, but it stops short of commenting on their “gender.” Nothing in Jesus’ statement can be taken to imply that angels are masculine, feminine, or neuter.
@@bitmasricco5699 Well, if one presumes such things as the existence of heaven, and presumes as well that Jesus is in fact god, then one has to go with what he says as ultimate authority, since nothing in the Hebrew bible answers the question. The Hebrew Bible and its marriage laws were written without belief in resurrection and afterlife, so the premise of laws is purely about family continuity and procreation in this world, for the purpose of maintaining family lines and therefore property claims. The ONLY pronouncement in scripture on the subject of marriage laws and resurrection, therefore, is that of Jesus. Under the above premises, that means in heaven marriage is irrelevant. Going further would be speculation, but my speculation would be that even those married for a lifetime on earth are not married in heaven, because it is pointless.
Father Spitzer always strengthens two things in me. My faith in God...and that I'm dumber than a box of rocks when it comes to anything beyond basic physics. Love his lectures!
I've just listened to part of his talk and I am actually a scientist. He has the complete opposite effect on me, because I can easily identify bad logic and misunderstood science in his talk. My other comments here explain what I mean with examples in the talk.
You're not dumber than rocks,. I th8nk I know less now as a percentage than when I was young and only one year younger than Fr Spitzer. You ask 9ne question, then you find an answer, that leads to two more questions, then those answers lead to four ans so it goes on.
We consider ourselves extremely intelligent capable of incredible things. The truth is we have all we can do to get up in the morning and tie our shoes. We are weak and fallible. Thank you God for all you have ever done. All glory is yours.
Yes. Thank you god for making us weak and fallible. On purpose. By your design. Making us get sick and hurt both mentally and physically by your design. Thank you for parasites that eat our eyes and all that nice stuff. Thank you for creating - by your design - a nature which is based on living things killing other living things from plants to animals just to survive in the world of your design. Thank you for creating us sick by your design and demanding us to heal ourselves while - by your design - we lack the ability to do so. Thank you for the Hell you created to punish us for being exactly like you designed us to be. Thank you.
"The truth is we have all we can do to get up in the morning and tie our shoes." Speak for yourself. "We are weak and fallible. Thank you God for all you have ever done. " All god has done? According to you he made weak and fallible humans.
Christians have no quality-control. Christians boast their lack of quality-control. The same god we know for a perfect record of doing nothing, is their servant for an unmeasurable number of prayers. Why would anyone confess Jesus Christ as Lord, when voting is a quality-control? Republicans rig the voting districts. The SCOTUS writes of its own stench. Christians are avoided like the old woman with too many cats, suggesting we travel best with one foot in fantasyland, based on butchered context in Roman propaganda. Who do you think licensed temples, controlled publication, crucified when imperial Rome created Christians? Why do you think every Alex Jones in the country, uses Jesus-lingo in the sales-pitch? The problem is; We depend on the fiction of government being better than no government, actually working, with voting as a quality-control. Christians boast having no quality-control. The same god we know for a perfect record of doing nothing, is their servant for an unmeasurable number of prayers. The only difference between a Republican & Democrat is how fast the knee hits the floor when a donor walks in the room. There is no plan, not for greenhouse gases, as long as energy is needed to keep the show on the road. Christians demand ownership of the narrative: We are all gods, children of the highest god. The ultimate vanity is declared, as they make a scene in the temple. Christians are the wolves in sheep's clothing, weighing in on whatnot as if Earth had gravity-free zones, would-be dictators suggesting we must all travel together, as if we all prefer leadership with one foot in fantasyland. We know a tree by the fruit. We know a man by his works. We thank God secular law & order finally ended the witch-killings & inquisitions.
I’m a Christian but the probabilistic rationale for belief in God using the fine tuning of universal constants is faulty because we have no idea of the probability distribution of each universal constant.
Today is the first time seeing Robert Spitzer. He's so funny XD, NOT ONCE, DID I LOSE INTEREST IN THE TALK OR GET DISTRACTED, Furthest being from boring i've ever heard
All priests are exorcists, technically speaking. But I've never heard that Fr. Spitzer ever delved into that. I'll have to ask some search algorithms now.
We live in an age where many of us require evidence at a very deep level. I was once among the doubters. Now I have friends and family who will often ask me about my 'conversion' and wish to know but they also seek a bit of "proof". Therefore I have shared this information about the Shroud and various Eucharistic miracles, which both also happen to share AB+ blood. The other piece I share is the event in 1968 when Our Lady appeared in Zietoun, Egypt for about two years. Fr. Spitzer, thank you for your great knowledge, wisdom & vision. God bless you. ❤
Why isn't Thomas's first proof sufficient? Has anyone EVER experienced something causing itself? Putting experience aside, does logic allow the assertion that a thing can cause itself? How? For a thing to cause itself means the causal thing precedes itself in time. That's an absurdity.
“As Terence McKenna observed, “Modern science is based on the principle: ‘Give us one free miracle and we’ll explain the rest.’ The one free miracle is the appearance of all the mass and energy in the universe and all the laws that govern it in a single instant from nothing.” ― Rupert Sheldrake, 'Morphic Resonance: The Nature of Formative Causation'
@@eternallight88 that is a fascinating question. I guess wed have to start we the use of the term laws regarding natural philosophy is not the same as the term when referring to, say road traffic management. You assuming agency in something you observe. This would be like wondering why a golf ball landed on a particular turf of grass. We don't assume the golf ball was guided. And we don't assume mathematics is more than some phenomenon we observe. I would stress: as I said: we can't conduct an experiment. So who knows the Universe may have been created by a God. That presents a more interesting question as why would a God bother?
@@russellmiles2861 From Wikipedia: "Scientific laws are statements, based on repeated experiments or observations, that describe or predict a range of natural phenomena.". I'm sure you're familiar with the laws of physics - gravity for example. They are "constants" in nature and they describe certain limits of physical reality. I didn't assume agency, I simply asked if you had a better explanation for what created these laws? You said "We have mathematical constructs that explain a universes creation." and I'm arguing that you don't have a mathematical construct for the *first cause* We know that golf balls are guided by golf players and both road traffic management and golf ball striking are conscious, deliberate actions of human beings. Why do you think the laws of physics are perfectly expressed through the language of mathematics? Eugene Paul Wigner once said "The unreasonable efficiency of mathematics in science is a gift we neither understand nor deserve." This is a scientist making a mystical statement about how we are able to understand creation through rational thought. You can't conduct a physical experiment on the creation of the universe but you can conduct thought experiments and there are many hypotheses such as M-theory. When you find a plausible explanation, you can either take a leap of faith that there is some high power/intelligence behind everything (theist), suspend judgement, remain skeptical and live in ignorance (agnostic) or deny any/all supernatural intervention and rely on a materialist, anthropocentric explanation (atheist). As to why God would bother - are you aware that in the Bible it states that "man is created in the likeness and image of God"? I would argue that God bothered so that you and I could experience the gift of life.
@@eternallight88 thank you for your considered reply. Although I couldn't help feel we are in agreement; ie, laws of physics are observations and as you state repeatable and verifiable. We don't set them. They even change or can be fluid. Eg, you mention Gravity. This is a most useful law for predicting movement of planets, space craft, footballs, etc. It doesn't matter that a subatomic level it doesn't work. We also don't really know what Gravity is: a strange weak force that is intentions across the universe. Much more work to be done there Re: first cause latter
If the creator of the universe can come into existence on its own, is it difficult for the universe to come into existence on its own? If there was no beginning for the creator, why the same cannot apply for the universe as well?
@@maxamahnken7325 In the beginning of what though? Rather ambiguous isn't it. Could be the beginning of a chapter. a story, a world, a universe..... What it can't be though on face value is the beginning of everything because before the 'beginning' there was apparently something. So your conundrum is to explain what that something was/is. Call it god if that suits you but a name for an unknown is nothing but a name.
Thank you Fr. Spitzer! I have always viewed the Shroud as sort of a time capsule. We didn’t even get to see the image of Jesus as a photo negative until photography was invented. I believe that science will be able to accurately date the Shroud and more mysteries will be unlocked, that will cause the Church to accept the Shroud as a holy relic and the actual burial shroud of Jesus Christ. Moreover, it will prove that not only did this shroud belong to Jesus Christ, but his body was reanimated by supernatural power. I believe that venerating the Shroud as a holy relic and Eucharistic miracles will go a long way to convert the skeptics of our modern scientific community. Praise be Jesus Christ!
Newest video on shroud has a new dating method it's a new x ray technology and writing on shroud says Jesus and Nazarene. Vatican researcher Barbara Frale also found writing on shroud. See video on U Tube
Thank you Fr Spitzer for a very interesting presentation. We now know that atheism is based purely on faith. A blind belief that God does not exist, for which there is absolutely no evidence. We can safely deduct that if there was any proof that God does not exist it would have been shoved up our throats in every school for decades! Around 16min 50sec you showed us a slide ''Peer-reviewed medical studies of a transcendent soul'' stating, ''that peer-reviewed studies show the high likelihood that we have a transcendent soul capable of surviving bodily death.'' A question: Who is the ''we'' (that has/possesses the soul) that the slide/research refers to? Am I the body that has a transcendent soul? Or, maybe, I am the eternal, transcendent soul? A particle of undying spirit in a temporary body? My material body is subject to death, that's obvious, but once the body is gone (buried, eaten by worms, cremated etc) who owns the soul? Maybe a different question: Who am I? Am I the body or am I the soul? Logic points to the latter, I think. We commonly say: my legs, my hands & my body. I cannot be my body having an eternal soul inside because during an NDE, when my soul gets out of my body and then I look at my body.... Who is doing the looking? My soul, my body... but who owns my soul and my body? Using logic I conclude that I AM the soul and I have a body. I, the soul, am looking at my body during an NDE, I think. But please feel free to accept the version that fits you. Thank you for your attention. God bless you. Salaam Aleikum. Sat Sri Akaal. Hare Krishna. Namaskar.
@@HeliSimDriver True enough - and there's plenty of invention going on in this video - I was just honestly wondering if there is some genuine mathematics backing up the number, because usually when I see the probability argument used, there's either nothing behind it (just numbers plucked out of the air to look impressive) or they're missing a factor necessary to do a valid probability calculation.
@@njhoepner Check out this video, it contains the information you are looking for ruclips.net/video/w31-opCnvOg/видео.html from 25:31 to 31:10 explains this, but I do recommend to watch the entire video, it is interesting.
@@davidochoa216 OK, well I am familiar with Lee Strobel (read his book on evidence for the resurrection many years ago). I at least see where the numbers come from now. I think they rely on a couple of underlying assumptions: 1) that the degree of "tuning" ie how closely a particular value has to be set is the same as the range of possibilities (turn the fineness of the factor into a denominator); and 2) that we know how many attempts at universes there may have been; and 3) that it is either "random" or "intelligent designer," in other words that these apparently random constants are not the product of deeper underlying laws that require them, and thus they are not improbable. However, I at least see where the numbers come from, which is better than them having been pulled out of thin air.
I looked for this pew research survey for hours and have not been able to find it. I trust someone will be able to supply a link or at least the title of the survey
There is no evidence of God. If there was, there would b no shortage of churches blasting it from their platforms. This fella wouldnt talk for 5+ minutes saying nothing if he had any evidence at all.
@@friedricengravy6646 there's a ton of evidence. Everything is evidence fir God. And most of the world sees it. There's onky a small, tiny, insignificant number of people who think they know better.
@@pdworld3421 So u think that how many people believe something is an indication of truth?? That is completely unsound. Second, u r implying that its arrogant to think we ‘know better’. When a person or institution makes a supernatural claim, its they who claim to know better. As well, the burden of proof falls on their shoulders. Lets look at the question ‘What comes before the Big Bang?’. Science is ok with saying ‘We dont know.’ They only speak on what we know based on what the evidence presents, nothing more….nothing less. Yet, its u & other followers of, lets say in this case, the Christian Bible who say that u know better than science. U know what ever came before was brought by a God of ur description. Science is humbled by nature. U have it all backwards. Ur Bible & ur holy men claim to know more & they demand that u believe this as fact without any evidence.
@friedricengravy I think that when there is a vast majority of people that believe something is true, that one should consider that they could be correct. Why do you think a tiny minority, and I mean tiny, are correct and everyone else is wrong?
I saw a documentary about (something like) how life could not have a risen by chance from inorganic matter even though there was some proof that certain amino acids have done this, because the odds of that type of mutation happening were so astronomical that given the rate of cellular development and mitosis that there literally wasn't enough seconds in the history of the universe or something like that to have come up haphazardly. Anybody know if Father spitzer has addressed this?
Does anyone know of where I might find citations for these numbers pertaining to the origin of the universe? There's someone whom I'd like to share them with.
The fact that young scientists are more commonly theists than older ones could mean many things: 1, as suggested here, scientists are becoming more religious 2: scientists lose their faith over the course of their career 3: young scientists are more likely to come from more theistic countries than older ones. So, basically, you can't draw a conclusion from this statistic.
It could also be that the current and/or newly considered evidence - as Father Spitzer laid out - when considered makes it more difficult to not believe in God for individuals open to considering evidence. In the past there were potential explanations other than God for the existence of the Universe, but these potential explanations are falling by the wayside. I would be curious to see what is considered a “scientist” in the polling. In past studies individuals in the hard sciences (chemistry, physics and medicine) had a higher level of believers than those in the soft sciences (psychology, sociology, etc.). One study I read found that 3% of psychologists believed in God, whereas more than 50% of physicians believed. I say all this because the percentage of people in the hard sciences may actually believe at a higher level.
I like your third explanation. Because he doesn't say they are dominantly Christian at all. More and more scientists are coming out of strongly religious societies like India, which would explain why more scientists are religious. Ofc, what scientists think doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is the evidence and logical arguments that scientists create.
They r attempting to claim a statistic (that we cannot verify) as evidence, but its barely anecdotal. This man provides no real evidence. That should tell u something. If there was evidence of God, there would b no shortage of churches blasting it from every available platform.
100% probably as God is the creator of mathematics and logic. Thinking about an infinite God that never didn't exist does get your brain twisted in a knot. If you added a zero for every atom in the universe to the number of years God existed before today, you wouldn't even come close. Mind boggling.
Can you provide links to the sources you cite? In particular, what is the source of the Pew research data on belief in God among scientists? I could not find that online. Thank you and God bless!
Thank you Fr Spitzer for a very interesting presentation. We now know that atheism is based purely on faith. A blind belief that God does not exist, for which there is absolutely no evidence. We can safely deduct that if there was any proof that God does not exist it would have been shoved up our throats in every school for decades! Around 16min 50sec you showed us a slide ''Peer-reviewed medical studies of a transcendent soul'' stating, ''that peer-reviewed studies show the high likelihood that we have a transcendent soul capable of surviving bodily death.'' A question: Who is the ''we'' (that has/possesses the soul) that the slide/research refers to? Am I the body that has a transcendent soul? Or, maybe, I am the eternal, transcendent soul? A particle of undying spirit in a temporary body? My material body is subject to death, that's obvious, but once the body is gone (buried, eaten by worms, cremated etc) who owns the soul? Maybe a different question: Who am I? Am I the body or am I the soul? Logic points to the latter, I think. We commonly say: my legs, my hands & my body. I cannot be my body having an eternal soul inside because during an NDE, when my soul gets out of my body and then I look at my body.... Who is doing the looking? My soul, my body... but who owns my soul and my body? Using logic I conclude that I AM the soul and I have a body. I, the soul, am looking at my body during an NDE, I think. But please feel free to accept the version that fits you. Thank you for your attention. God bless you. Salaam Aleikum. Sat Sri Akaal. Hare Krishna. Namaskar.
How can he say our universe is friendly to life? If there was a field where rice could only grow on .00000000000001% of the field, would you say that field is friendly to rice? It’s a very strange comment.
Yeah I saw one person's estimate of the Earth's volume being 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003% of the universe. Well that's the _entire_ Earth, but only 1% is crust, and only 29% of _that_ is land, and only a portion of the land is suitable to human life. So the idea of "fine tuning" with respect to humans is ridiculous.
Book of Genesis is FACT. Please find below scientific/cosmological/archaeological/historical proof & explanation behind the Book of Genesis. The actual scientific explanation for the 7 days of creation is something like this; The universe is 7 days old at the point of creation( looking forward) and 13.8 billion years old (looking backwards at the point of creation). This is called space time dilation - the further you get from the point of creation - the older the age of the universe. Cross section of the universe is as per NASA WMAP diagram. map.gsfc.nasa.gov/media/060915/060915_CMB_Timeline600.jpg Gerald Schroeder PhD and Hugh Ross - Phd Astrophysicists have explained this further. a)Gerald Schroeder has even given the rough mathematical formula for the age of the universe. (and also the each day = x billion years long) (+/- factor of 10 error) geraldschroeder.com/wordpress/?page_id=53 ruclips.net/video/GjtHqxhwNgk/видео.html ruclips.net/video/_RuIVCm7pNc/видео.html (diff between HughRoss & GeraldS is minimal. The differences - GS used Olam(modern Hebrew) vs yom ) b) Hugh Ross gives very detailed explanations on the frames of reference God is talking from in i) Gen 1.1 - at the point of creation(1st day/2nd day/3rd day), ii) Gen 1.2 from the surface of the earth iii) Gen 1.3 - Let there be light - the atmosphere become transparent iv) Age of man decreased from 1000 years to 120 years - Hugh Ross explains in his video how the explosion of the supernova about 100k years ago ( monoserotis ??) and that the cosmic radiation from this caused genetic degradation. this is why the age of the patriarchs decreased from 1000 years (adam to noah/shem) to 120ish around abraham. This radiation was x light years away and would have hit earth around the time of noah. ruclips.net/video/JlGVqUZo83s/видео.html - Did God create earth before the sun and moon ruclips.net/video/SwNypNs0lW4/видео.html - testing genesis with science Jeremiah 33 - Gods laws of physics do not change God created the universe in the divine Hebrew language. When all the numerical values of Hebrew names of the elements/planets/etc are graphed against their properties - it consistently produces a straight line. By Prof Haim Shore. ruclips.net/video/noW-yHjaMVY/видео.html ruclips.net/video/QvKlP7hEo-Q/видео.html ruclips.net/video/VYlKkIoavnA/видео.html (hidden codes in the books of moses) ruclips.net/video/AB1_dJpN-9s/видео.html (hidden codes in the books of moses) The creation of Adam & Eve After creation of Adam & eve, God entered the Sabbath/7th day ruclips.net/video/UfAyRixVfmE/видео.html Garden of Eden located at the head of the Persian gulf. Now fully submerged. Prof Juris Zarins work as per History channel ( see online) www.ldolphin.org/eden/ ruclips.net/video/av7xVGrz3D4/видео.html ruclips.net/video/76PWWNDaMb4/видео.html Noahs Flood proof Heres the physical proof of Noahs flood : 12k years ago a meteorite hit the Greenland Hiawatha Glacier and created a crater 30km in diameter. ruclips.net/video/zfapz2F8Vz0/видео.html It flooded the Americas to Middle east. It was regional flood & not global flood. The sea level rose about 150m feet and low lying places settlements like sundaland(asia), black sea, Mediterranean basin were swallowed up by the sea. Africa was minimally affected. Thats why you find wooly mammoths remains from Americas to Siberia frozen in ice and mud with partially digested food in its stomach. American megafauna was wiped out (camelops, lions, cheetahs) Mammoth bones in Mexico - buried under 30feet of mud www.geologyin.com/2019/12/over-800-mammoth-bones-discovered-in.html ruclips.net/video/qMVhR26NRsk/видео.html ruclips.net/video/YWZgfPGtQEs/видео.html ruclips.net/video/A2PzfWur6pY/видео.html ( US landscape carved out by noahs flood) Thats why Africa has wider genetic diversity than rest of the world. African genes stretch from Africa to India to Sentinelese ( andaman islands) to Papua new guinea + Australia & Japan(ainu). But you dont find indigenous black population in Americas or Europe. The Clovis people of the Americas suddenly went extinct. ruclips.net/video/vTr3VdGlFr8/видео.html ( crater for impact site at greenland ) ruclips.net/video/hMTTFLiOwX0/видео.html www.sciencealert.com/ancient-carvings-in-turkey-show-a-comet-hitting-earth-changing-civilisation-forever?fbclid=IwAR31PrxiKk1I3tl_ZPZ06sued-ApIEnaXPW--AyGvc-ptSiyWo8vG9XWlAw Triggers for Noahs flood & 13k years of climate stability The detailed science/data that documents the climate change over the last few million years. God truly tweaked the planet to enable us to live here. Tectonics, asteriod impacts etc that made the climate stable for the last 13k years for us to live in. The world we currently live in is a drop of stability in an otherwise highly unstable planet. Also, 13k years ago...an asteroid impact at Greenland ( Hiawatha glacier) triggered noahs flood. Noah got advance warning ruclips.net/video/siKSz1GRUUU/видео.html ruclips.net/video/xOMKINuzbdE/видео.html Noahs Ark by ron wyatt ruclips.net/video/TXGqIP0716Q/видео.html (1985 news report) ruclips.net/video/_XZBZTgmIS0/видео.html Ron Wyatt on CNN ruclips.net/video/oQwfU7DvUyE/видео.html (ark location ) documents.theblackvault.com/documents/cia/noahsark-CIA.pdf ruclips.net/video/1O8wGjwyS7o/видео.html ( anchor stones found ) ruclips.net/video/_zsqxjqS8hg/видео.html ( aerial overview) ruclips.net/video/vfBfCkH49D8/видео.html ( artifacts from Noahs ark/Sinai/Sodom) Sodom and Gomorrah. ( see Ron wyatts videos) The chemical analysis of the brimstone ( sulphur balls) @ near 98% purity ( white) vs volcanic sulphur which is only 45% purity (yellow) A meteorite with high purity sulpur content vapourised/ionised the structures here. Theres melted sand, bone fragments and other proof ruclips.net/video/tZKBHyIBrHA/видео.html www.lifesitenews.com/news/archeologists-sodom-and-gomorrah-literally-destroyed-by-fire-and-brimstone? www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-97778-3? Joseph, Moses and red sea crossing ruclips.net/video/n_VQ7rG638w/видео.html (all points summary) ruclips.net/video/aBDbDeepyS4/видео.html (Josephs granary) The santorini volcano was the trigger for the 10 biblical plagues. (explained in the movie Exodus Decoded by James Cameron. Disregard the crossing site/mountain) Theres archaeological &video proof of coral encrusted chariot wheels & bone in the Red Sea @ Nurweiba crossing between Egypt and Saudi Arabia. ruclips.net/video/lSf0rOqJaSU/видео.html (Red sea crossing overview & land bridge topography) ruclips.net/video/QeX966OVxwU/видео.html (red sea crossing site) ruclips.net/video/Lzb4ekyX1kc/видео.html (Coral encrusted chariots wheel) ruclips.net/video/d90NM9tgDQE/видео.html Coral encrusted chariots wheel) ruclips.net/video/vaN2acVMGC8/видео.html (Solomons pillar marking crossing sites 3k yrs old) The parting of the red sea happened due to a strong easterly wind blowing @40mph + low tidal effect possibly due to tsunami & lunar position. Dr Gerald Schroeder quotes some studies done. ruclips.net/video/8y-uiccIiSY/видео.html (Forbidden footage of actual location of Red Sea Crossing & Mt. Sinai - (melted sand at nurweiba beach 21:45) ruclips.net/video/vfBfCkH49D8/видео.html ( artifacts from Noahs ark/Sinai/Sodom) Footage of Mount Sinai The top of Mount Sinai/Mount Horeb ( Jebel al Lawz) in saudi arabia has melted & blackened rock. when you break it...the inside is red. Its the only mountain in the area to be black...rest are reddish. ruclips.net/video/n_VQ7rG638w/видео.html (all points summary ) ruclips.net/video/PE1W6sz24Dw/видео.html (Top of Sinai, altars,12 pillars, Elijahs cave) ruclips.net/video/VgdUoNrwkxk/видео.html (overview ) ruclips.net/video/A2widAV9wiE/видео.html ( drone footage @ Sinai - split rock) ruclips.net/video/TwCd4WQbSXM/видео.html&pbjreload=10 aerial view ruclips.net/video/K-eSRcr9CWw/видео.html (Ron Wyatt) ruclips.net/video/9ubKUip6pz0/видео.html Dr Kim pt 1 ruclips.net/video/52DKSvcZMPw/видео.html Dr Kim pt2 ruclips.net/video/vfBfCkH49D8/видео.html ( artifacts from Noahs ark/Sinai/Sodom) Eucharistic miracle.. ruclips.net/video/soCkftBBsBo/видео.html ruclips.net/video/oogJ-cdi7yI/видео.html (Rome Reports) ruclips.net/video/whbzLYi7cyc/видео.html (Lanciano) ruclips.net/video/6PJ8BORx1p8/видео.html ruclips.net/video/bd16tBRbLXw/видео.html ruclips.net/video/PvxTDAVypxs/видео.html (levitating eucharist) Incorruptible bodies of saints due to the Eucharist - only happens in the Catholic church. No other religion has this miracle ruclips.net/video/GSCk0qs-2-M/видео.html (Padre Pio) ruclips.net/video/9ZEa5bjBB78/видео.html (catholic incorrupt Bodies pics/videos ) ruclips.net/video/jN4SvtRje2I/видео.html ruclips.net/video/-TrR1CEWdbc/видео.html ruclips.net/video/XCDBekAQ-FI/видео.html (Carlo Acutis) ruclips.net/video/33vlkJh2iJc/видео.html Apparition of Virgin Mary ruclips.net/video/GQnKS7YUE7Q/видео.html (Virgin Mary apparition in Ivory Coast) ruclips.net/video/0PPGuMmn6TQ/видео.html (Virgin Mary statue moving) ruclips.net/video/tVU8bhbQInw/видео.html (Virgin Mary apparition in Egypt) ruclips.net/video/nMEWxRB-1dc/видео.html 1968 Egypt ruclips.net/video/8YR6INkTK7Q/видео.html (Miracle of the sun) ruclips.net/video/yF0_ysUivxE/видео.html (Miracle of the sun) ruclips.net/video/76qAMB3qUpA/видео.html Sun miracle in Medjugorje in Easter Sunday
@Raverraver9999 That's some list you have there. Put all that aside... the point is - the bible isn't a science book. If anyone reads it like that, they're being distracted from the intention behind it. Wouldn't you agree?
Fellow admirers Fr. Spitzer is so blessed with this Knowledge that he makes science so interesting because it's through science, that we can try to comprehend the complicity of the Cosmos, intertwined with divine, faith and reason. I feel privileged to be a catholic because it's the true catholic doctrine, that defines the Universe. God Bless you Fr.Spitzer.
He has macular degeneration. I met him first when he was initially diagnosed and could still see with some unusual glasses. I’m sure he now reads as any blind person does-listening to super fast recordings of written material.
A question to all?? I’m Looking forward to an intelligent reply.?? Moved by lust at the sight of her, King David called for Bathsheba to be brought to him and slept with her. David committed adultery with a married woman called Bathsheba, wife of Uriah. what's more, David murdered Uriah by proxy by ordering all of Uriah's comrades to abandon him in the midst of battle, so that he ended up getting killed by an opposing army. The Prophet Nathan was sent by God and warned King David. well, Torah verses clearly say that both URIAH and DAVID Blessed by GOD. Well, the question is, if Uriah, David and Bathsheba go to heaven. To whom will Bathsheba be given? This question is ready to test the wisdom of all of you: The Bible [ Torah]: God promised that God had already chosen all three humans for heaven: David, Uriah and Bathsheba. I’m Looking forward to an intelligent reply. Note: God said through Nathan the prophet that King David was rich. Uriah was poor and had nothing but Bathsheba, a little lamb. Therefore, God here assured that the couple was chosen through the parable. David's prayer sought forgiveness and Later King David has been forgiven too. no doubt all three will go to heaven. If So, to whom will Bathsheba be given? Note: Matthew 22/23-30: There will be no right answer. The question raised by the Sadducees was about the impossible situation of a widow having seven husbands, all brothers. If Abraham goes to heaven, Sarah will be his wife in heaven. just as Mary will be Joseph's wife. Matthew 22:23-33/ It has a different meaning. You and your spouse love each other, live together on earth, and are true believers in Christ. If they go to heaven, they don't need to remarry. They don't need to create new babies.
They are the same odds as a hurricane smashing through a junk yard and at the end, a perfectly working 747 Boeing Jet is created with engineering all ready for take off.
When the biochemical processes stop, so does consciousness. Life after death is a ridiculous belief, but then so are these people who are incapable of being intellectually honest.
Also importantly for the purpose of misrepresenting the data, it doesn't break it down into gods.. I'd be surprised if a good % of the theistic science students weren't Hindu.
@@pdworld3421 So considering they represent only 7% of the worlds population that's pretty good. You'd have to agree by your own criteria. Last time I looked 100 - 51 = 49 too but spin however it suits you....
The whole lecture at its core was just a big argument from personal incredulity. But is always good to hear from the opposite viewpoint to try to understand it.
The Holy Shroud of Turin, The Sudarium, the infinitesimal eternal universe and DNA give us the 100% certainty that God is God and Jesus is Who He is. Thank God for The Holy Ghost.
What about calculating the odds of an everlasting diety who suddenly decides it is lonely, who creates a universe specifically designed to enable life with all its complexity, and wait for billions of years to send his son to experience a miserable humanoid death, so that his son can prove his existence. I would think the odds of that happening are much lower than 10 x 10 to the power of 125. Why not just prove his existence by parting one of the oceans now that we can observe and record the splitting of the ocean? Much more effective than splitting the Red Sea without being able to record and broadcast the evidence for the entire world to see? But if somehow, this is still more likely than a natural beginning of life, it begs the question of why go through all that trouble and all that waiting? Why not just create the sun and the earth in 7 days or less, and forget about all the galaxies and everything else? I guess god works in ‘mysterious’ ways 🙄 After all, with all that godly power, apparently everything is possible. Why beat around the bush if all you want are humans who will worship your monumental non godly ego, and torture them for eternity if they don’t? A loving god? I think not.
The problem I have wtih Ray Rogers conclusion that the cotton was from a later dated sewn on side-strip by nuns is that Rogers was not the first person to discover that cotton was in the Shroud. Nor did Rogers have the ability to compare the Shroud sample with a non-controversial area. Professer Gilbert Raes, the same person named for the adjacent Raes sample confirmed years earlier that there also was cotton in his sample. Rogers apparently didn't know this because he seemed surprised to find cotten after Barrie Schowrtz challenged Rogers to take another look at the fibers. Professer Raes speculated that the loom used for the Shroud was previously used to make cotton fabrics. Hence the cotton became mixed with the linen Shroud. Which theory is correct? Did the cotton come from a side-strip sewn by the Poor Clare Nuns in the 15th century or was the cotton mixed from a loom previously used to make cotten fabric? This is uncertain. However, some argue that the early Jews were not allowed to mix different fabrics on their looms as it was against their laws. On the other hand, how reliable is the proof that the Poor Clare Nuns actually used Frence re-weaving to sew on a side-strip? Source: "Verdict on the Shroud" by Stevenson and Habermas (1981).
One should note that the magis center where this man is getting his statistics from is a highly biased Christion organization. Science does not point to God. Don't believe me? Go ask any real scientist.
@@johnhammond6423 Science of course points to God. What part of 10^10 ^123 : 1 are you missing. Scientism is naive and unscientific. Look up final causality. Most scientists don't study philosophy of science and say really dumb things.
There is life and the opposite death. In life, beings eat drink and work and sleep. In death all that ceases as the living person no longer exists. Ecclesiastes 9:10 Whatever your hand finds to do, do with all your might, for there is no work nor planning nor knowledge nor wisdom in the Grave, where you are going.
Ecclesiastes 9:5 For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing at all, nor do they have any more reward, because all memory of them is forgotten. 6 also their love and their hate and their jealousy have already perished. John 5:28. All those in their memorial tombs will hear his voice and come out. If everyone is in Heaven or hell, who are those in their memorial tombs.
I just started listening and already there is a serious flaw. It's important to keep these discussions intellectually honest. The point being there is a vast cataclysmic difference between "God" and "a higher transcendent power." The God of the Bible was petty and vengeful. As for humanity, there is random beauty and suffering so the nature of this higher power remains a mystery. Anyway my main point here is that the scientists who are theists are likely not referring to the God of the Bible in their belief systems.
One set at a time - you have to believe there is a God to make you decide to read the Bible- and be open to the LESSONS of the Bible (I never liked when my parents punished me when I made a bad decision, but I don’t call them petty and vengeful
I ask, why can’t existence be infinite the same way we say God is infinite? Unless, you can answer, your reasons for God are all based on assumptions and begging the question answers.
There is passion but picking and choosing marginal science and walking down one narrow path to arrive at the most profound universal conclusions possible becomes absurd.
With all that stated by father Spitzer, if life is found in another planet which is not that far off, what explanation would be given in terms of religious beliefs?
Firstly..Ad Popularum isnt evidence.The fact that lots of people believe something to be true has no bearing at all on it actually being true..Its a fallacious position.
I wonder if the increase in theists in science and medicine may be due to which cultures these people are coming from now compared to previous generations - India, the Middle East, etc...
Father, if particle radiation from the "disintegration" of Jesus's Holy Body made the Image on His holy Shroud, doesn't that mean radioactive material that once was Jesus's holy Body is still in the Shroud?
He mentioned that we should expect to find some isotopes of calcium & chlorine produced by the radiation. Radioactive elements may have decayed by now but some products like these should remain.
Genesis, Quantum Physics and Reality by Peter Zoeller-Greer. How Quantum Physics proves the existence of God. ‘…leads to a new Anthropic principle - the Divine.”
This is flawed logic being dished out in this video. You are getting your science from the wrong person. Expand your knowledge and think for yourself more.
From what he said finite bubble universes are still a possibility so how can you say our version of s God I say the only option? If there is something we would think of as a god it does not mean it has any concern about what it creates.
He has actually Said NOTHING if you ask me and those statistics are CLEARLY wrong! Anybody provide verifiable links as sources for those statistics? I remain AGNOSTIC
will you please consider being on the Joe Rogan Experience ? I understand the challenges but the key is to get more people to think about Our Lord Jesus
can someone show me some peer reviewed medical studies showing that there is a high likelihood that we have a transcendent soul? Not a single citation in this whole "lecture"...
@@mommaknos1136 The Bible says just as all died in Adam, all shall be made alive in Christ. So all are saved. Some immediately, others after being purged of their sins and evil in hell.
each cell in the human body is capable of generation 1.4 volts but at a very low amperage. a person about 200 pounds in weight will look like a 100 watt firefly.
@@ThisDoctorKnows Hi Doctor, I hope and pray that hell is not eternal, but everyone I know, in my church, believes that it is. Can you give me some information of why you think that some people, who end up in hell, are there till their sins are purged? I struggle with doubts about God and how weak my faith is I think. I keep repeating the same cycle of sinning and repenting and I can't help feeling because of that I will end up in hell for all eternity. Thank you.
@@bmm9095 Check out the RUclips channel “The Total Victory of Christ”. Check out David Bentley Hart’s book “That All Shall Be Saved”. Also check out father Aiden Kimmel, David Bentley Hart, Ilaria Ramelli and Robin Parry on the topic of the salvation of all beings through Jesus Christ. Edit: The correct name is Aiden Kimmel not Alfred Kimmel. My apologies.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
This genius of a man , this Jesuit priest is the one who actually turned my head to pay attention to on a couch 5-6 years ago as I was laying in my misery from Cancer treatments at my home. Not the treatments but the attempt at resting or just laying in despair and depression and anxiety and PTSD unable to hardly move an inch. Because of this priest I very slowly began dragging my feet back to a semblance of Catholicism. He is blind , brilliant, I love him and pray when I remember for him that he led me back.
Great testimonial , Mimi. God is Alive. God is Love. Jesus was sent to Earth as a baby to show the rest of us humans, the beloved creature of God's creation, how to behave, live in service to others and in a living and loving relationship with God. That Jesus is considered the Son of God the Father with the Love between the Father and the Son being the manifestation of the Holy Spirit , or the Paraclete as Jesus declared would be sent to carry mankind forward after Jesus would no longer be with His 12 apostles, we have the three persons of the Holy Trinity. The encouragement, love and hope you felt listening to Fr. Spritzer was the Comforter. That is one of the manifestations of the Holy Spirit, the love of God. You were open to it so you were graced with it. People make it so hard to believe because we are all affected by satan's blight to mankind. Those baptized are given the graces to fight against the evil but often fail. Just get back up again. That is all you need to do. Just like Mimi was open to. Seek forgiveness and repentance for not following the best path you knew to follow, and start to experience the peace and contentment that Mimi finally did. It is never too late to turn to the One God who created the universe. Repent and believe in the Lamb of God who died to take away the sins of the world, Jesus Christ. He existed in history. He was born, walked with His chosen 12, allowed himself to be crucified, died was laid in a tomb on a Friday and rose from the grave on Easter Sunday morning. He was the Jewish born Messiah for All of Mankind. That's ALL God asks so little of us. All the unbelief, questioning, confusion, doubting is of the evil one. Bottom line: quit running away and instead run toward the God who made you and wants nothing more than your recognition that you belong to someone who loves you more than you can imagine. If you turn toward God and pray for guidance, watch out. Because you will get a good response!! One last thing to consider that can change how you think of everything: if it is good, it is of God because God is all good. God does Not Cause bad to happen. But He does allow it so He can allow some good to come out of it. ex: illness and dis-ease is not from God. It is a result of the first man's fall from grace. From the result of evil . But God allows illness for a greater good to come from it. Perhaps for Mimi that greater good was the revelation finally understood due to 10:54 Fr. Spitzer's uncanny brains, whit and unwavering faith and conviction that bubbles over because such joy cannot be contained. Fr. Spritzer is a rare breed that sees his challenges even as a gift from God. He has give.his life to serve Jesus Christ as fully as possible. He is smart, insightful, effective in his explanations and research and writings. I imagine he will have a very comfortable reward in heaven one day. He is one of those pretty certain to hear "Welcome my good and faithful servant!" Let's just hope it is not for a long time to come. We need Shepards like Fr. Spritzer here below.
It happened 4 decades ago in a premier research institute in India. The presentation was about the breakthrough in nuclear medicine. The speaker differentiated x-ray from nuclear medicine stating that while the former gave the structural image the later gave a functional image. I was only a student among the audience of top scientists. During the QA session I asked if it can be used to detect what happens when a person dies. The audience and the speaker brushed aside my question with a laughter. I sank in shame. After 40 years, fully detached from science, Fr.Spitzer is making me happy. Thanks.
Thank you for enduring the Shame you felt ....trust me you have no reason to be shameful ....the people who laughed at you are very similar to those who laughed at Noah
Consider yourself in good company. All the visionaries have been mocked and cajoled. It's part of being a Christian.
@@Catquick1957 Ah, here we go; the old Christian persecution complex.
@@nonprogrediestregredi1711 Since when did facts become a complex? :)
@@timmoore9736 And what facts would those be?
If you are here. You are here for a reason! JESUS is king. Awesome doesn't even touch his Glory.if you seek him you will find him. He is that good. JESUS loves you! He will change your life. trust him. THANK YOU JESUS for being my SAVIOR. I LOVE YOU JESUS. you are my king❤
Christians boast their lack of quality-control.
The same god we know for a perfect record of doing nothing,
is their servant for an unmeasurable number of prayers.
Why would anyone confess Jesus Christ as Lord,
when voting is a quality-control?
Republicans rig the voting districts.
The SCOTUS writes of its own stench.
Christians are avoided like the old woman with too many cats,
suggesting we travel best with one foot in fantasyland,
based on butchered context in Roman propaganda.
Who do you think licensed temples, controlled publication,
crucified when imperial Rome created Christians?
Why do you think every Alex Jones in the country,
uses Jesus-lingo in the sales-pitch?
The problem is;
We depend on the fiction of government being better than no government, actually working, with voting as a quality-control.
Christians boast having no quality-control.
The same god we know for a perfect record of doing nothing,
is their servant for an unmeasurable number of prayers.
The only difference between a Republican & Democrat
is how fast the knee hits the floor when a donor walks in the room.
There is no plan, not for greenhouse gases, as long as energy is needed to keep the show on the road.
Christians demand ownership of the narrative: We are all gods, children of the highest god.
The ultimate vanity is declared,
as they make a scene in the temple.
Christians are the wolves in sheep's clothing,
weighing in on whatnot as if Earth had gravity-free zones,
would-be dictators suggesting we must all travel together,
as if we all prefer leadership with one foot in fantasyland.
We know a tree by the fruit.
We know a man by his works.
We thank God secular law & order
finally ended the witch-killings & inquisitions.
"If you are here. You are here for a reason! "
The reason I am here is because the video is titled "The Latest Scientific Evidence of God".
Ignoring the fact that "The Latest Scientific Evidence of God" makes no sense because so far no scientific evidence for god has been shown, I watched to see if ANY scientific evidence for god is presented here.
None is.
@@TdBone They think this improves God sales, having scientific evidence for characters only known from fiction, as if a deity who can't get everyone's attention, is worthy of the Divine title.
@@cnault3244 Scientism is such a drag, and completely devoid of the more appropriate philosophical treatment of God's existence. What do you want, for God to pop down and pose for a photograph? To say 'cheese' for you and your godless pals before heading back up to heaven?
@@AntUasalÓNiadh Why not? According to the Bible, god talks to numerous people, or pops down to see them, or wrestles with them ( god lost btw), or has them over for dinner.
Let's assume the discussion was about the existence of leprechauns and rephrase your question so you can see how stupid your post was:
Scientism is such a drag, and completely devoid of the more appropriate philosophical treatment of leprechauns' existence. What do you want, for a leprechaun to pop over and pose for a photograph? To say 'cheese' for you and your pals before heading back to their pot of gold?
The fact is I said NOTHING about scientific evidence for god. Evidence for something does not have to be scientific. Now, what is your BEST evidence for god?
You can tell how giddy and excited he gets simply talking about this stuff. He's super into it like a little kid, tripping over his words and sometimes stuttering.
THIS guy BELIEVES
Fr Spitzer has a contagious enthusiasm! The YT logarithm kindly sent me his lecture on the Turin Shroud; I had never really doubted it - but the evidence presented so engagingly by Fr S was like music to my ears! I thank Our Lord for giving us a glimpse of His Holy Face. Makes me cry. 🙏❤️🙏
The so-called "evidence" for the Turin shroud is only convincing for people who already believe the shroud was the burial cloth of Jesus.
Absolutely love this man of the cloth! 🙏
God bless you father
@Tbone pretty lonely soul...huh?
Stay healthy for the rest of your life. Denying God is eternity in hell, that's a long long time. Now be a good boy and take the garbage out like your mommy asked and do something constructive with yourself like, get a job.
I’ve always believed that science was proof of God’s brilliance and that the beauty of the cosmos and everything within it was an expression of God’s perfect love. I’m glad Father Spitzer provided the evidence to back it up. The truth shall prevail!
The magis center where this man is getting his statistics from is a highly biased Christion organization.
Science does not point to God. Don't believe me? Go ask any real scientist.
@Caleb OKAY
What's a scientific ideal?
Sorry, but science has nothing to do with God. Science has nothing to do with miracles or the supernatural. It only deals with information data.
@@kalords5967 “There are two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle.”
- Albert Einstein
@@sxt4447 Albert Einstein did not believe in the personal God who rewards and punishes people based on their actions.
What an intellect this priest has.
Thank you Fr Robert for talking about NDE. Yes, things are changing, thank God.
This priest is outstanding. My fear is who will succeed him. Father please pass on your brilliant intellect to someone else too.
Aside from everything else, Father recites all this without notes.
I LOVE this guy!!! No disrespect intended whatsoever! Father just blows my minuscule mind!🙏🏻😁😇❤️
Praise God there are younger scientists that believe in God! Hopefully that will continue to grow and spread to the general population! Love Fr. Spitzer, and have enjoyed my first Majis Center Catholic Women’s Bible study!
trouble is they'll be mostly Hindu.... you're cool with that.
or do you assume they'll become Christian .... for some reason...
@irishmclass2042, Unfortunately, the world media is totally against God. They withhold gems of information of discoveries about the most astonishing facts already in the Bible. We can only rely on experts like Fr. Spitzer to spread the newfound realities of the Holy Book in Archeology , Science, and with the help of technology. As you say, our hope for the future lies in young scientists-to-be and a revival.
@@ecysmith6652
If only there were organizations with billions of dollars in assets that would stand up for the bible....
Clearly Fr Spitzer was a scientist before God called him to the Priesthood. A wonderful talk. Thank u Fr.
He wasn't ever a scientist.
Seen and experienced Miracles from prayers to Jesus Christ!
I enjoyed watching this.
Of course he’s one of the good priests. May God bless him. I was feeling very low today but his lecture has lifted me up. Praise the Lord.
Fairytales can be comforting.
@@downenout8705
Okay Thomas
@@hoponpop3330 "One of" as if the existence of your mythagog did anything done make another evidential excuses for your tyrannical deity, mythelot.
Watch it again on a lense of a outsider of such faith and you'll see how deceptive it is...
@@hoponpop3330 Yep, but the problem with that story is that when Thomas asked for empirical evidence he was provided it. Today however when an atheist asks for empirical evidence of the truth of 1 Corinthians 15: 14 all you get is apologetic excuses.
@@hoponpop3330 Should we start a Church of Later Day Thomas's
Fr Spitzer gives Glory to God.
May my life do so in some way.
Thank you Dr Spitzer
Myself as well.
Thank you Fr Spitzer for a very interesting presentation.
We now know that atheism is based purely on faith.
A blind belief that God does not exist, for which there
is absolutely no evidence.
We can safely deduct that if there was any proof that
God does not exist it would have been shoved up our
throats in every school for decades!
Around 16min 50sec you showed us a slide ''Peer-reviewed
medical studies of a transcendent soul'' stating, ''that
peer-reviewed studies show the high likelihood that we have
a transcendent soul capable of surviving bodily death.''
A question:
Who is the ''we'' (that has/possesses the soul)
that the slide/research refers to?
Am I the body that has a transcendent soul?
Or, maybe, I am the eternal, transcendent soul?
A particle of undying spirit in a temporary body?
My material body is subject to death,
that's obvious, but once the body is gone
(buried, eaten by worms, cremated etc)
who owns the soul?
Maybe a different question:
Who am I?
Am I the body or am I the soul?
Logic points to the latter, I think.
We commonly say:
my legs, my hands & my body.
I cannot be my body having an eternal soul inside
because during an NDE, when my soul gets out of my
body and then I look at my body....
Who is doing the looking?
My soul, my body... but who owns my soul and my body?
Using logic I conclude that I AM the soul and I have a body.
I, the soul, am looking at my body during an NDE, I think.
But please feel free to accept the version that fits you.
Thank you for your attention.
God bless you.
Salaam Aleikum.
Sat Sri Akaal.
Hare Krishna.
Namaskar.
Fantastic! It is fulfilling for me to hear that, before his death, Dr. Hawkins was able to see the glory of God in His infinite creation of the Universe that He, Himself created by His supreme intelligence and flawless architecture. And praise God for humans to have a soul and that is manifested in Science at the moment of death, and in life, by Jesus Christ.
He seen that it was the only choice to explain the miraculous universe.
Unfortunately that's not true...I'll I say is that the truth regarding that is easily obtainable out there.
@@espojespo5 I am not going to argue with you. Your religion is atheism, mine is Christianity. Think how you like but allow me to think like great minds such as Isaac Newton, Hobble, Boyle, Lavoisier, to cite just a few. So, I am in good company.
@@TdBone That’s your opinion and I am not going to argue with you. I just feel sad that you think this way.
Did you mean Fr. Stephen Hawking ( not Hawkins)? Why are you bearing false witness against Stephen Hawking?
“And the Good News about the Kingdom will be preached throughout the whole world, so that all nations will hear it; and then the end will come. (MTHW 24:14).”
A question to all?? I’m Looking forward to an intelligent reply.?? Moved by lust at the sight of her, King David called for Bathsheba to be brought to him and slept with her. David committed adultery with a married woman called Bathsheba, wife of Uriah. what's more, David murdered Uriah by proxy by ordering all of Uriah's comrades to abandon him in the midst of battle, so that he ended up getting killed by an opposing army. The Prophet Nathan was sent by God and warned King David. well, Torah verses clearly say that both URIAH and DAVID Blessed by GOD.
Well, the question is, if Uriah, David and Bathsheba go to heaven. To whom will Bathsheba be given? This question is ready to test the wisdom of all of you: The Bible [ Torah]: God promised that God had already chosen all three humans for heaven: David, Uriah and Bathsheba. I’m Looking forward to an intelligent reply.
Note: God said through Nathan the prophet that King David was rich. Uriah was poor and had nothing but Bathsheba, a little lamb. Therefore, God here assured that the couple was chosen through the parable. David's prayer sought forgiveness and Later King David has been forgiven too. no doubt all three will go to heaven. If So, to whom will Bathsheba be given? Note: Matthew 22/23-30: There will be no right answer. The question raised by the Sadducees was about the impossible situation of a widow having seven husbands, all brothers. If Abraham goes to heaven, Sarah will be his wife in heaven. just as Mary will be Joseph's wife. Matthew 22:23-33/ It has a different meaning. You and your spouse love each other, live together on earth, and are true believers in Christ. If they go to heaven, they don't need to remarry. They don't need to create new babies.
@@bitmasricco5699 Jesus answers this very question in the gospels when it is given to him by the Sadducees.
@@bitmasricco5699 I think a much bigger question is this: according to God's supposedly perfect law, David was guilty of two capital crimes. Bathsheba is either rape victim or guilty of one capital crime (adultery) - we don't know since, like most women in the bible, her views don't matter. The only certainly innocent party is the baby she gives birth to. The outcome? David goes on to be Israel's great king and the model for the coming messiah. Bathsheba goes on to be queen mother. The baby gets executed by slow torture. The question is: what does this say about the justice of God?
@@njhoepner well said, Ok! come to the question is: if Uriah, David and Bathsheba go to heaven. To whom will Bathsheba be given? Note : Every reference to angels in Scripture is in the masculine gender. Angels are never referred to in any gender other than masculine.
• In Matthew 22:30 Jesus says that there will be no marriage in heaven because we “will be like the angels in heaven.” This verse states that angels do not marry, but it stops short of commenting on their “gender.” Nothing in Jesus’ statement can be taken to imply that angels are masculine, feminine, or neuter.
@@bitmasricco5699 Well, if one presumes such things as the existence of heaven, and presumes as well that Jesus is in fact god, then one has to go with what he says as ultimate authority, since nothing in the Hebrew bible answers the question. The Hebrew Bible and its marriage laws were written without belief in resurrection and afterlife, so the premise of laws is purely about family continuity and procreation in this world, for the purpose of maintaining family lines and therefore property claims. The ONLY pronouncement in scripture on the subject of marriage laws and resurrection, therefore, is that of Jesus. Under the above premises, that means in heaven marriage is irrelevant. Going further would be speculation, but my speculation would be that even those married for a lifetime on earth are not married in heaven, because it is pointless.
Father Spitzer always strengthens two things in me. My faith in God...and that I'm dumber than a box of rocks when it comes to anything beyond basic physics. Love his lectures!
Me too
Haha amen
I've just listened to part of his talk and I am actually a scientist. He has the complete opposite effect on me, because I can easily identify bad logic and misunderstood science in his talk. My other comments here explain what I mean with examples in the talk.
You're not dumber than rocks,. I th8nk I know less now as a percentage than when I was young and only one year younger than Fr Spitzer.
You ask 9ne question, then you find an answer, that leads to two more questions, then those answers lead to four ans so it goes on.
Amazing how smart you seem to a room full of people that know less than you. Now, try that in a room full of people that are more educated than you.
Love listening and learning from Dr. Father Spitzer. He’s amazing.
Thanks, folks. It is so edifying and uplifting to listen to Father Spitzer: a wonderful voice of reason and sanity. What a brilliant witness.
We consider ourselves extremely intelligent capable of incredible things. The truth is we have all we can do to get up in the morning and tie our shoes. We are weak and fallible. Thank you God for all you have ever done. All glory is yours.
Yes. Thank you god for making us weak and fallible. On purpose. By your design. Making us get sick and hurt both mentally and physically by your design. Thank you for parasites that eat our eyes and all that nice stuff. Thank you for creating - by your design - a nature which is based on living things killing other living things from plants to animals just to survive in the world of your design. Thank you for creating us sick by your design and demanding us to heal ourselves while - by your design - we lack the ability to do so. Thank you for the Hell you created to punish us for being exactly like you designed us to be. Thank you.
We suck but we’re the best gods lame
"The truth is we have all we can do to get up in the morning and tie our shoes."
Speak for yourself.
"We are weak and fallible. Thank you God for all you have ever done. "
All god has done? According to you he made weak and fallible humans.
Superb!
Christians have no quality-control.
Christians boast their lack of quality-control.
The same god we know for a perfect record of doing nothing,
is their servant for an unmeasurable number of prayers.
Why would anyone confess Jesus Christ as Lord,
when voting is a quality-control?
Republicans rig the voting districts.
The SCOTUS writes of its own stench.
Christians are avoided like the old woman with too many cats,
suggesting we travel best with one foot in fantasyland,
based on butchered context in Roman propaganda.
Who do you think licensed temples, controlled publication,
crucified when imperial Rome created Christians?
Why do you think every Alex Jones in the country,
uses Jesus-lingo in the sales-pitch?
The problem is;
We depend on the fiction of government being better than no government, actually working, with voting as a quality-control.
Christians boast having no quality-control.
The same god we know for a perfect record of doing nothing,
is their servant for an unmeasurable number of prayers.
The only difference between a Republican & Democrat
is how fast the knee hits the floor when a donor walks in the room.
There is no plan, not for greenhouse gases, as long as energy is needed to keep the show on the road.
Christians demand ownership of the narrative: We are all gods, children of the highest god.
The ultimate vanity is declared,
as they make a scene in the temple.
Christians are the wolves in sheep's clothing,
weighing in on whatnot as if Earth had gravity-free zones,
would-be dictators suggesting we must all travel together,
as if we all prefer leadership with one foot in fantasyland.
We know a tree by the fruit.
We know a man by his works.
We thank God secular law & order
finally ended the witch-killings & inquisitions.
There is zero scientific evidence to prove the existence of God and the soul, nor is there life after death.
Thank you Fr Spitzer I love listening to you and enjoy your books!! God bless you
I’m a Christian but the probabilistic rationale for belief in God using the fine tuning of universal constants is faulty because we have no idea of the probability distribution of each universal constant.
My Lord
My God !
Today is the first time seeing Robert Spitzer. He's so funny XD, NOT ONCE, DID I LOSE INTEREST IN THE TALK OR GET DISTRACTED, Furthest being from boring i've ever heard
It’s always inspirational, enlightening, and educational to listen to Father Spitzer. And he’s also an exorcist!
All priests are exorcists, technically speaking. But I've never heard that Fr. Spitzer ever delved into that. I'll have to ask some search algorithms now.
We live in an age where many of us require evidence at a very deep level. I was once among the doubters. Now I have friends and family who will often ask me about my 'conversion' and wish to know but they also seek a bit of "proof". Therefore I have shared this information about the Shroud and various Eucharistic miracles, which both also happen to share AB+ blood. The other piece I share is the event in 1968 when Our Lady appeared in Zietoun, Egypt for about two years. Fr. Spitzer, thank you for your great knowledge, wisdom & vision. God bless you. ❤
Why isn't Thomas's first proof sufficient? Has anyone EVER experienced something causing itself? Putting experience aside, does logic allow the assertion that a thing can cause itself? How? For a thing to cause itself means the causal thing precedes itself in time. That's an absurdity.
“As Terence McKenna observed, “Modern science is based on the principle: ‘Give us one free miracle and we’ll explain the rest.’ The one free miracle is the appearance of all the mass and energy in the universe and all the laws that govern it in a single instant from nothing.”
― Rupert Sheldrake, 'Morphic Resonance: The Nature of Formative Causation'
We have mathematical constructs that explain a universes creation. Of course hard to run an experiment. But we don't have to retort to miracles.
@@russellmiles2861 So what created the laws of physics?
@@eternallight88 that is a fascinating question. I guess wed have to start we the use of the term laws regarding natural philosophy is not the same as the term when referring to, say road traffic management. You assuming agency in something you observe. This would be like wondering why a golf ball landed on a particular turf of grass. We don't assume the golf ball was guided. And we don't assume mathematics is more than some phenomenon we observe.
I would stress: as I said: we can't conduct an experiment. So who knows the Universe may have been created by a God.
That presents a more interesting question as why would a God bother?
@@russellmiles2861 From Wikipedia: "Scientific laws are statements, based on repeated experiments or observations, that describe or predict a range of natural phenomena.".
I'm sure you're familiar with the laws of physics - gravity for example.
They are "constants" in nature and they describe certain limits of physical reality.
I didn't assume agency, I simply asked if you had a better explanation for what created these laws?
You said "We have mathematical constructs that explain a universes creation." and I'm arguing that you don't have a mathematical construct for the *first cause*
We know that golf balls are guided by golf players and both road traffic management and golf ball striking are conscious, deliberate actions of human beings.
Why do you think the laws of physics are perfectly expressed through the language of mathematics?
Eugene Paul Wigner once said "The unreasonable efficiency of mathematics in science is a gift we neither understand nor deserve."
This is a scientist making a mystical statement about how we are able to understand creation through rational thought.
You can't conduct a physical experiment on the creation of the universe but you can conduct thought experiments and there are many hypotheses such as M-theory.
When you find a plausible explanation, you can either take a leap of faith that there is some high power/intelligence behind everything (theist), suspend judgement, remain skeptical and live in ignorance (agnostic) or deny any/all supernatural intervention and rely on a materialist, anthropocentric explanation (atheist).
As to why God would bother - are you aware that in the Bible it states that "man is created in the likeness and image of God"?
I would argue that God bothered so that you and I could experience the gift of life.
@@eternallight88 thank you for your considered reply. Although I couldn't help feel we are in agreement; ie, laws of physics are observations and as you state repeatable and verifiable. We don't set them. They even change or can be fluid. Eg, you mention Gravity. This is a most useful law for predicting movement of planets, space craft, footballs, etc. It doesn't matter that a subatomic level it doesn't work. We also don't really know what Gravity is: a strange weak force that is intentions across the universe. Much more work to be done there
Re: first cause latter
If the creator of the universe can come into existence on its own, is it difficult for the universe to come into existence on its own? If there was no beginning for the creator, why the same cannot apply for the universe as well?
Yep
Magic.....
"In "the beginning" God created the heavens and the earth". Yes the universe had a beginning.
@@maxamahnken7325
In the beginning of what though?
Rather ambiguous isn't it.
Could be the beginning of a chapter.
a story, a world, a universe.....
What it can't be though on face value is the beginning of everything because before the 'beginning' there was apparently something.
So your conundrum is to explain what that something was/is.
Call it god if that suits you but a name for an unknown is nothing but a name.
@@roscius6204 There was nothing before the beginning. Other ---- than ---- God Himself. God as the Creator bringing ---- all things into existence.
@@roscius6204 Before the beginning there was nothing. Other than God.
Everyone has evidence of god but no one has ever won any of the world's prizes, no Noble prize.
Thank you Fr. Spitzer! I have always viewed the Shroud as sort of a time capsule. We didn’t even get to see the image of Jesus as a photo negative until photography was invented. I believe that science will be able to accurately date the Shroud and more mysteries will be unlocked, that will cause the Church to accept the Shroud as a holy relic and the actual burial shroud of Jesus Christ. Moreover, it will prove that not only did this shroud belong to Jesus Christ, but his body was reanimated by supernatural power. I believe that venerating the Shroud as a holy relic and Eucharistic miracles will go a long way to convert the skeptics of our modern scientific community. Praise be Jesus Christ!
Newest video on shroud has a new dating method it's a new x ray technology and writing on shroud says Jesus and Nazarene. Vatican researcher Barbara Frale also found writing on shroud. See video on U Tube
Thank you Fr Spitzer for a very interesting presentation.
We now know that atheism is based purely on faith.
A blind belief that God does not exist, for which there
is absolutely no evidence.
We can safely deduct that if there was any proof that
God does not exist it would have been shoved up our
throats in every school for decades!
Around 16min 50sec you showed us a slide ''Peer-reviewed
medical studies of a transcendent soul'' stating, ''that
peer-reviewed studies show the high likelihood that we have
a transcendent soul capable of surviving bodily death.''
A question:
Who is the ''we'' (that has/possesses the soul)
that the slide/research refers to?
Am I the body that has a transcendent soul?
Or, maybe, I am the eternal, transcendent soul?
A particle of undying spirit in a temporary body?
My material body is subject to death,
that's obvious, but once the body is gone
(buried, eaten by worms, cremated etc)
who owns the soul?
Maybe a different question:
Who am I?
Am I the body or am I the soul?
Logic points to the latter, I think.
We commonly say:
my legs, my hands & my body.
I cannot be my body having an eternal soul inside
because during an NDE, when my soul gets out of my
body and then I look at my body....
Who is doing the looking?
My soul, my body... but who owns my soul and my body?
Using logic I conclude that I AM the soul and I have a body.
I, the soul, am looking at my body during an NDE, I think.
But please feel free to accept the version that fits you.
Thank you for your attention.
God bless you.
Salaam Aleikum.
Sat Sri Akaal.
Hare Krishna.
Namaskar.
Sorry but it's from the middle ages...also it was a popular thing they did with the images
@@richardlawson6787 - really? Then please enlighten us on how you fake the burial shroud of Jesus. We can’t even come close to a copy today.
Why are you sorry, Richard? Yours is an opinion, like anyone else’s. You are entitled to have it!
I would like to know how he arrived at the probability number he posed (10^10^125). How did that calculation come about?
If you can invent a god, you can invent anything😂
@@HeliSimDriver True enough - and there's plenty of invention going on in this video - I was just honestly wondering if there is some genuine mathematics backing up the number, because usually when I see the probability argument used, there's either nothing behind it (just numbers plucked out of the air to look impressive) or they're missing a factor necessary to do a valid probability calculation.
@@njhoepner Check out this video, it contains the information you are looking for ruclips.net/video/w31-opCnvOg/видео.html from 25:31 to 31:10 explains this, but I do recommend to watch the entire video, it is interesting.
@@davidochoa216 OK, thanks, I'll check it out.
@@davidochoa216 OK, well I am familiar with Lee Strobel (read his book on evidence for the resurrection many years ago). I at least see where the numbers come from now. I think they rely on a couple of underlying assumptions: 1) that the degree of "tuning" ie how closely a particular value has to be set is the same as the range of possibilities (turn the fineness of the factor into a denominator); and 2) that we know how many attempts at universes there may have been; and 3) that it is either "random" or "intelligent designer," in other words that these apparently random constants are not the product of deeper underlying laws that require them, and thus they are not improbable. However, I at least see where the numbers come from, which is better than them having been pulled out of thin air.
I looked for this pew research survey for hours and have not been able to find it. I trust someone will be able to supply a link or at least the title of the survey
There is no evidence of God. If there was, there would b no shortage of churches blasting it from their platforms. This fella wouldnt talk for 5+ minutes saying nothing if he had any evidence at all.
@@friedricengravy6646 there's a ton of evidence. Everything is evidence fir God. And most of the world sees it. There's onky a small, tiny, insignificant number of people who think they know better.
@@pdworld3421 So u think that how many people believe something is an indication of truth??
That is completely unsound. Second, u r implying that its arrogant to think we ‘know better’. When a person or institution makes a supernatural claim, its they who claim to know better. As well, the burden of proof falls on their shoulders. Lets look at the question ‘What comes before the Big Bang?’. Science is ok with saying ‘We dont know.’ They only speak on what we know based on what the evidence presents, nothing more….nothing less. Yet, its u & other followers of, lets say in this case, the Christian Bible who say that u know better than science. U know what ever came before was brought by a God of ur description. Science is humbled by nature. U have it all backwards. Ur Bible & ur holy men claim to know more & they demand that u believe this as fact without any evidence.
@@pdworld3421 Awesome answer.... just awesome.
@friedricengravy I think that when there is a vast majority of people that believe something is true, that one should consider that they could be correct.
Why do you think a tiny minority, and I mean tiny, are correct and everyone else is wrong?
How do they calculate the odds. Just pluck them out of the air. I would like to see the figures and the formula.
Universe friendly to life? God did it. I've never understood this answer.
10:18 the fine tuning conjecture has zero actual scientific support. It is often quoted, but there is no science behind it.
And the Boltmann brain paradox was never suggesting a god existed.
I saw a documentary about (something like) how life could not have a risen by chance from inorganic matter even though there was some proof that certain amino acids have done this, because the odds of that type of mutation happening were so astronomical that given the rate of cellular development and mitosis that there literally wasn't enough seconds in the history of the universe or something like that to have come up haphazardly. Anybody know if Father spitzer has addressed this?
To me, the number of people who believe in God is irrelevant to any argument as to whether there is a god or not.
Question, why would jesus resurrect Lazarus if he'd achieved some higher level of existence?
Does anyone know of where I might find citations for these numbers pertaining to the origin of the universe? There's someone whom I'd like to share them with.
The fact that young scientists are more commonly theists than older ones could mean many things:
1, as suggested here, scientists are becoming more religious
2: scientists lose their faith over the course of their career
3: young scientists are more likely to come from more theistic countries than older ones.
So, basically, you can't draw a conclusion from this statistic.
We like the numbers.
@@marcosgonzalez4525 What do you like about them?
It could also be that the current and/or newly considered evidence - as Father Spitzer laid out - when considered makes it more difficult to not believe in God for individuals open to considering evidence. In the past there were potential explanations other than God for the existence of the Universe, but these potential explanations are falling by the wayside.
I would be curious to see what is considered a “scientist” in the polling. In past studies individuals in the hard sciences (chemistry, physics and medicine) had a higher level of believers than those in the soft sciences (psychology, sociology, etc.). One study I read found that 3% of psychologists believed in God, whereas more than 50% of physicians believed. I say all this because the percentage of people in the hard sciences may actually believe at a higher level.
I like your third explanation. Because he doesn't say they are dominantly Christian at all. More and more scientists are coming out of strongly religious societies like India, which would explain why more scientists are religious.
Ofc, what scientists think doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is the evidence and logical arguments that scientists create.
They r attempting to claim a statistic (that we cannot verify) as evidence, but its barely anecdotal. This man provides no real evidence. That should tell u something. If there was evidence of God, there would b no shortage of churches blasting it from every available platform.
So if was so statistically unlikely for life to be created, how statistically difficult was it for God to be created in the first place?
100% probably as God is the creator of mathematics and logic.
Thinking about an infinite God that never didn't exist does get your brain twisted in a knot. If you added a zero for every atom in the universe to the number of years God existed before today, you wouldn't even come close. Mind boggling.
Can you provide links to the sources you cite? In particular, what is the source of the Pew research data on belief in God among scientists? I could not find that online. Thank you and God bless!
You won't find anything, because "father" is lying.
Thank you Fr Spitzer for a very interesting presentation.
We now know that atheism is based purely on faith.
A blind belief that God does not exist, for which there
is absolutely no evidence.
We can safely deduct that if there was any proof that
God does not exist it would have been shoved up our
throats in every school for decades!
Around 16min 50sec you showed us a slide ''Peer-reviewed
medical studies of a transcendent soul'' stating, ''that
peer-reviewed studies show the high likelihood that we have
a transcendent soul capable of surviving bodily death.''
A question:
Who is the ''we'' (that has/possesses the soul)
that the slide/research refers to?
Am I the body that has a transcendent soul?
Or, maybe, I am the eternal, transcendent soul?
A particle of undying spirit in a temporary body?
My material body is subject to death,
that's obvious, but once the body is gone
(buried, eaten by worms, cremated etc)
who owns the soul?
Maybe a different question:
Who am I?
Am I the body or am I the soul?
Logic points to the latter, I think.
We commonly say:
my legs, my hands & my body.
I cannot be my body having an eternal soul inside
because during an NDE, when my soul gets out of my
body and then I look at my body....
Who is doing the looking?
My soul, my body... but who owns my soul and my body?
Using logic I conclude that I AM the soul and I have a body.
I, the soul, am looking at my body during an NDE, I think.
But please feel free to accept the version that fits you.
Thank you for your attention.
God bless you.
Salaam Aleikum.
Sat Sri Akaal.
Hare Krishna.
Namaskar.
How can he say our universe is friendly to life? If there was a field where rice could only grow on .00000000000001% of the field, would you say that field is friendly to rice? It’s a very strange comment.
Yeah I saw one person's estimate of the Earth's volume being 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003% of the universe. Well that's the _entire_ Earth, but only 1% is crust, and only 29% of _that_ is land, and only a portion of the land is suitable to human life. So the idea of "fine tuning" with respect to humans is ridiculous.
Our universe has a unique way of thinning the inhabitants off the map. Simply defined
Can someone please provide a link to the statistical survey
Book of Genesis is FACT. Please find below scientific/cosmological/archaeological/historical proof & explanation behind the Book of Genesis. The actual scientific explanation for the 7 days of creation is something like this; The universe is 7 days old at the point of creation( looking forward) and 13.8 billion years old (looking backwards at the point of creation). This is called space time dilation - the further you get from the point of creation - the older the age of the universe. Cross section of the universe is as per NASA WMAP diagram.
map.gsfc.nasa.gov/media/060915/060915_CMB_Timeline600.jpg
Gerald Schroeder PhD and Hugh Ross - Phd Astrophysicists have explained this further.
a)Gerald Schroeder has even given the rough mathematical formula for the age of the universe.
(and also the each day = x billion years long) (+/- factor of 10 error)
geraldschroeder.com/wordpress/?page_id=53
ruclips.net/video/GjtHqxhwNgk/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/_RuIVCm7pNc/видео.html (diff between HughRoss & GeraldS is minimal. The differences - GS used Olam(modern Hebrew) vs yom )
b) Hugh Ross gives very detailed explanations on the frames of reference God is talking from in
i) Gen 1.1 - at the point of creation(1st day/2nd day/3rd day),
ii) Gen 1.2 from the surface of the earth
iii) Gen 1.3 - Let there be light - the atmosphere become transparent
iv) Age of man decreased from 1000 years to 120 years - Hugh Ross explains in his video how the explosion of the supernova about 100k years ago ( monoserotis ??) and that the cosmic radiation from this caused genetic degradation. this is why the age of the patriarchs decreased from 1000 years (adam to noah/shem) to 120ish around abraham. This radiation was x light years away and would have hit earth around the time of noah.
ruclips.net/video/JlGVqUZo83s/видео.html - Did God create earth before the sun and moon ruclips.net/video/SwNypNs0lW4/видео.html - testing genesis with science
Jeremiah 33 - Gods laws of physics do not change
God created the universe in the divine Hebrew language. When all the numerical values of Hebrew names of the elements/planets/etc are graphed against their properties - it consistently produces a straight line. By Prof Haim Shore.
ruclips.net/video/noW-yHjaMVY/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/QvKlP7hEo-Q/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/VYlKkIoavnA/видео.html (hidden codes in the books of moses)
ruclips.net/video/AB1_dJpN-9s/видео.html (hidden codes in the books of moses)
The creation of Adam & Eve
After creation of Adam & eve, God entered the Sabbath/7th day
ruclips.net/video/UfAyRixVfmE/видео.html
Garden of Eden located at the head of the Persian gulf. Now fully submerged.
Prof Juris Zarins work as per History channel ( see online)
www.ldolphin.org/eden/
ruclips.net/video/av7xVGrz3D4/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/76PWWNDaMb4/видео.html
Noahs Flood proof
Heres the physical proof of Noahs flood : 12k years ago a meteorite hit the Greenland Hiawatha Glacier and created a crater 30km in diameter.
ruclips.net/video/zfapz2F8Vz0/видео.html
It flooded the Americas to Middle east. It was regional flood & not global flood.
The sea level rose about 150m feet and low lying places settlements like sundaland(asia), black sea, Mediterranean basin were swallowed up by the sea. Africa was minimally affected.
Thats why you find wooly mammoths remains from Americas to Siberia frozen in ice and mud with partially digested food in its stomach. American megafauna was wiped out (camelops, lions, cheetahs)
Mammoth bones in Mexico - buried under 30feet of mud
www.geologyin.com/2019/12/over-800-mammoth-bones-discovered-in.html
ruclips.net/video/qMVhR26NRsk/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/YWZgfPGtQEs/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/A2PzfWur6pY/видео.html ( US landscape carved out by noahs flood)
Thats why Africa has wider genetic diversity than rest of the world. African genes stretch from Africa to India to Sentinelese ( andaman islands) to Papua new guinea + Australia & Japan(ainu).
But you dont find indigenous black population in Americas or Europe.
The Clovis people of the Americas suddenly went extinct.
ruclips.net/video/vTr3VdGlFr8/видео.html ( crater for impact site at greenland )
ruclips.net/video/hMTTFLiOwX0/видео.html
www.sciencealert.com/ancient-carvings-in-turkey-show-a-comet-hitting-earth-changing-civilisation-forever?fbclid=IwAR31PrxiKk1I3tl_ZPZ06sued-ApIEnaXPW--AyGvc-ptSiyWo8vG9XWlAw
Triggers for Noahs flood & 13k years of climate stability
The detailed science/data that documents the climate change over the last few million years. God truly tweaked the planet to enable us to live here. Tectonics, asteriod impacts etc that made the climate stable for the last 13k years for us to live in. The world we currently live in is a drop of stability in an otherwise highly unstable planet.
Also, 13k years ago...an asteroid impact at Greenland ( Hiawatha glacier) triggered noahs flood.
Noah got advance warning
ruclips.net/video/siKSz1GRUUU/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/xOMKINuzbdE/видео.html
Noahs Ark by ron wyatt
ruclips.net/video/TXGqIP0716Q/видео.html (1985 news report)
ruclips.net/video/_XZBZTgmIS0/видео.html Ron Wyatt on CNN
ruclips.net/video/oQwfU7DvUyE/видео.html (ark location )
documents.theblackvault.com/documents/cia/noahsark-CIA.pdf
ruclips.net/video/1O8wGjwyS7o/видео.html ( anchor stones found )
ruclips.net/video/_zsqxjqS8hg/видео.html ( aerial overview)
ruclips.net/video/vfBfCkH49D8/видео.html ( artifacts from Noahs ark/Sinai/Sodom)
Sodom and Gomorrah. ( see Ron wyatts videos)
The chemical analysis of the brimstone ( sulphur balls) @ near 98% purity ( white) vs volcanic sulphur which is only 45% purity (yellow)
A meteorite with high purity sulpur content vapourised/ionised the structures here. Theres melted sand, bone fragments and other proof
ruclips.net/video/tZKBHyIBrHA/видео.html
www.lifesitenews.com/news/archeologists-sodom-and-gomorrah-literally-destroyed-by-fire-and-brimstone?
www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-97778-3?
Joseph, Moses and red sea crossing
ruclips.net/video/n_VQ7rG638w/видео.html (all points summary)
ruclips.net/video/aBDbDeepyS4/видео.html (Josephs granary)
The santorini volcano was the trigger for the 10 biblical plagues.
(explained in the movie Exodus Decoded by James Cameron. Disregard the crossing site/mountain)
Theres archaeological &video proof of coral encrusted chariot wheels & bone in the Red Sea @ Nurweiba crossing between Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
ruclips.net/video/lSf0rOqJaSU/видео.html (Red sea crossing overview & land bridge topography)
ruclips.net/video/QeX966OVxwU/видео.html (red sea crossing site)
ruclips.net/video/Lzb4ekyX1kc/видео.html (Coral encrusted chariots wheel)
ruclips.net/video/d90NM9tgDQE/видео.html Coral encrusted chariots wheel)
ruclips.net/video/vaN2acVMGC8/видео.html (Solomons pillar marking crossing sites 3k yrs old)
The parting of the red sea happened due to a strong easterly wind blowing @40mph + low tidal effect possibly due to tsunami & lunar position. Dr Gerald Schroeder quotes some studies done.
ruclips.net/video/8y-uiccIiSY/видео.html (Forbidden footage of actual location of Red Sea Crossing & Mt. Sinai - (melted sand at nurweiba beach 21:45)
ruclips.net/video/vfBfCkH49D8/видео.html ( artifacts from Noahs ark/Sinai/Sodom)
Footage of Mount Sinai
The top of Mount Sinai/Mount Horeb ( Jebel al Lawz) in saudi arabia has melted & blackened rock. when you break it...the inside is red. Its the only mountain in the area to be black...rest are reddish.
ruclips.net/video/n_VQ7rG638w/видео.html (all points summary )
ruclips.net/video/PE1W6sz24Dw/видео.html (Top of Sinai, altars,12 pillars, Elijahs cave)
ruclips.net/video/VgdUoNrwkxk/видео.html (overview )
ruclips.net/video/A2widAV9wiE/видео.html ( drone footage @ Sinai - split rock)
ruclips.net/video/TwCd4WQbSXM/видео.html&pbjreload=10 aerial view
ruclips.net/video/K-eSRcr9CWw/видео.html (Ron Wyatt)
ruclips.net/video/9ubKUip6pz0/видео.html Dr Kim pt 1
ruclips.net/video/52DKSvcZMPw/видео.html Dr Kim pt2
ruclips.net/video/vfBfCkH49D8/видео.html ( artifacts from Noahs ark/Sinai/Sodom)
Eucharistic miracle..
ruclips.net/video/soCkftBBsBo/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/oogJ-cdi7yI/видео.html (Rome Reports)
ruclips.net/video/whbzLYi7cyc/видео.html (Lanciano)
ruclips.net/video/6PJ8BORx1p8/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/bd16tBRbLXw/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/PvxTDAVypxs/видео.html (levitating eucharist)
Incorruptible bodies of saints due to the Eucharist - only happens in the Catholic church. No other religion has this miracle
ruclips.net/video/GSCk0qs-2-M/видео.html (Padre Pio)
ruclips.net/video/9ZEa5bjBB78/видео.html (catholic incorrupt Bodies pics/videos )
ruclips.net/video/jN4SvtRje2I/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/-TrR1CEWdbc/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/XCDBekAQ-FI/видео.html (Carlo Acutis)
ruclips.net/video/33vlkJh2iJc/видео.html
Apparition of Virgin Mary
ruclips.net/video/GQnKS7YUE7Q/видео.html (Virgin Mary apparition in Ivory Coast)
ruclips.net/video/0PPGuMmn6TQ/видео.html (Virgin Mary statue moving)
ruclips.net/video/tVU8bhbQInw/видео.html (Virgin Mary apparition in Egypt)
ruclips.net/video/nMEWxRB-1dc/видео.html 1968 Egypt
ruclips.net/video/8YR6INkTK7Q/видео.html (Miracle of the sun)
ruclips.net/video/yF0_ysUivxE/видео.html (Miracle of the sun)
ruclips.net/video/76qAMB3qUpA/видео.html Sun miracle in Medjugorje in Easter Sunday
@Raverraver9999 That's some list you have there. Put all that aside... the point is - the bible isn't a science book. If anyone reads it like that, they're being distracted from the intention behind it. Wouldn't you agree?
@@pdworld3421 the point is that it isnt a fairy tale
@Raverraver9999 Agreed but Fairy Tales have gotten a bad rap
Fellow admirers Fr. Spitzer is so blessed with this Knowledge that he makes science so interesting because it's through science, that we can try to comprehend the complicity of the Cosmos, intertwined with divine, faith and reason.
I feel privileged to be a catholic because it's the true catholic doctrine, that defines the Universe. God Bless you Fr.Spitzer.
Father Spitzer is great. I can't figure out if he has a problem with his eyes, and if so, how does he read so much?
He's blind
He is blind
@@barbc6934 only physically : )
His Blind Dear one. 🙏
He has macular degeneration. I met him first when he was initially diagnosed and could still see with some unusual glasses.
I’m sure he now reads as any blind person does-listening to super fast recordings of written material.
Thank you for increasing my faith Fr. Excellent presentation. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
Thoroughly enjoyed this, thank you. Our God is an awesome God. ✝️
A question to all?? I’m Looking forward to an intelligent reply.?? Moved by lust at the sight of her, King David called for Bathsheba to be brought to him and slept with her. David committed adultery with a married woman called Bathsheba, wife of Uriah. what's more, David murdered Uriah by proxy by ordering all of Uriah's comrades to abandon him in the midst of battle, so that he ended up getting killed by an opposing army. The Prophet Nathan was sent by God and warned King David. well, Torah verses clearly say that both URIAH and DAVID Blessed by GOD.
Well, the question is, if Uriah, David and Bathsheba go to heaven. To whom will Bathsheba be given? This question is ready to test the wisdom of all of you: The Bible [ Torah]: God promised that God had already chosen all three humans for heaven: David, Uriah and Bathsheba. I’m Looking forward to an intelligent reply.
Note: God said through Nathan the prophet that King David was rich. Uriah was poor and had nothing but Bathsheba, a little lamb. Therefore, God here assured that the couple was chosen through the parable. David's prayer sought forgiveness and Later King David has been forgiven too. no doubt all three will go to heaven. If So, to whom will Bathsheba be given? Note: Matthew 22/23-30: There will be no right answer. The question raised by the Sadducees was about the impossible situation of a widow having seven husbands, all brothers. If Abraham goes to heaven, Sarah will be his wife in heaven. just as Mary will be Joseph's wife. Matthew 22:23-33/ It has a different meaning. You and your spouse love each other, live together on earth, and are true believers in Christ. If they go to heaven, they don't need to remarry. They don't need to create new babies.
Wow 2000 years of tradition, and we got you!
They are the same odds as a hurricane smashing through a junk yard and at the end, a perfectly working 747 Boeing Jet is created with engineering all ready for take off.
I’m amazed at this man’s ability to rattle off so much off the top of his head.
One can believe in God without believing in religion
When the biochemical processes stop, so does consciousness. Life after death is a ridiculous belief, but then so are these people who are incapable of being intellectually honest.
Hard to believe that there is such a thing as an intelligent atheist. A true oxymoron right there.
beverlyhurd8556
No need to be jealous...
As I understand the poll in question 33% are theists and another 18 percent believe in a higher power. Saying 51% are theists is a little misleading.
I think it means that they aren't staunch materialists. Higher power implies some kind of divinity, but fair point
Also importantly for the purpose of misrepresenting the data, it doesn't break it down into gods..
I'd be surprised if a good % of the theistic science students weren't Hindu.
@@roscius6204 pl
@@roscius6204 still, only 17% are atheists, do when atheists try to make it sound like most scientists are atheists, that's not even close
@@pdworld3421 So considering they represent only 7% of the worlds population that's pretty good.
You'd have to agree by your own criteria.
Last time I looked 100 - 51 = 49 too
but spin however it suits you....
The whole lecture at its core was just a big argument from personal incredulity.
But is always good to hear from the opposite viewpoint to try to understand it.
The statistics and probabilities don’t matter to you?
Unfortunately it always is.
Theists wonder why we find it so frustrating that their proof is always simply an assertion.
The Holy Shroud of Turin, The Sudarium, the infinitesimal eternal universe and DNA give us the 100% certainty that God is God and Jesus is Who He is. Thank God for The Holy Ghost.
What about calculating the odds of an everlasting diety who suddenly decides it is lonely, who creates a universe specifically designed to enable life with all its complexity, and wait for billions of years to send his son to experience a miserable humanoid death, so that his son can prove his existence.
I would think the odds of that happening are much lower than 10 x 10 to the power of 125.
Why not just prove his existence by parting one of the oceans now that we can observe and record the splitting of the ocean? Much more effective than splitting the Red Sea without being able to record and broadcast the evidence for the entire world to see?
But if somehow, this is still more likely than a natural beginning of life, it begs the question of why go through all that trouble and all that waiting? Why not just create the sun and the earth in 7 days or less, and forget about all the galaxies and everything else? I guess god works in ‘mysterious’ ways 🙄
After all, with all that godly power, apparently everything is possible. Why beat around the bush if all you want are humans who will worship your monumental non godly ego, and torture them for eternity if they don’t? A loving god? I think not.
The problem I have wtih Ray Rogers conclusion that the cotton was from a later dated sewn on side-strip by nuns is that Rogers was not the first person to discover that cotton was in the Shroud. Nor did Rogers have the ability to compare the Shroud sample with a non-controversial area. Professer Gilbert Raes, the same person named for the adjacent Raes sample confirmed years earlier that there also was cotton in his sample. Rogers apparently didn't know this because he seemed surprised to find cotten after Barrie Schowrtz challenged Rogers to take another look at the fibers. Professer Raes speculated that the loom used for the Shroud was previously used to make cotton fabrics. Hence the cotton became mixed with the linen Shroud. Which theory is correct? Did the cotton come from a side-strip sewn by the Poor Clare Nuns in the 15th century or was the cotton mixed from a loom previously used to make cotten fabric?
This is uncertain. However, some argue that the early Jews were not allowed to mix different fabrics on their looms as it was against their laws. On the other hand, how reliable is the proof that the Poor Clare Nuns actually used Frence re-weaving to sew on a side-strip? Source: "Verdict on the Shroud" by Stevenson and Habermas (1981).
Father Spitzer is a heroic manifestation of grace. A great gift to mankind.
One should note that the magis center where this man is getting his statistics from is a highly biased Christion organization.
Science does not point to God. Don't believe me? Go ask any real scientist.
yet he's following and promoting sin - since he's catholic.
Bible is clear on this, Tom.
@@johnhammond6423 Science of course points to God. What part of 10^10 ^123 : 1 are you missing. Scientism is naive and unscientific. Look up final causality. Most scientists don't study philosophy of science and say really dumb things.
@@tommore3263
_'Most scientists don't study philosophy of science'_
That's right, most scientists do 'science'
He is lying while wearing a collar. He knows this is not real evidence, yet he is willing to make that claim anyway.
One of the smartest men ever, and speaks the truth, thanks God
"All you need is a neutron flux to explain that baby"
Hahahahhaa
There is life and the opposite death. In life, beings eat drink and work and sleep. In death all that ceases as the living person no longer exists.
Ecclesiastes 9:10 Whatever your hand finds to do, do with all your might, for there is no work nor planning nor knowledge nor wisdom in the Grave, where you are going.
Thank you Father Spitzer, some light of faith has sparked in me.
THIS HAS STRENGTGEN MY FAITH
Any scientist who believes in a God, like after death and or a Devine Jesus has not used the scientific process to reach that decision.
WELL DONE FATHER......Thank you so much for this! God bless you for this scientific perspective!😂
How are you,Fr.Spitzer
Ecclesiastes 9:5
For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing at all, nor do they have any more reward, because all memory of them is forgotten. 6 also their love and their hate and their jealousy have already perished.
John 5:28. All those in their memorial tombs will hear his voice and come out.
If everyone is in Heaven or hell, who are those in their memorial tombs.
I just started listening and already there is a serious flaw. It's important to keep these discussions intellectually honest. The point being there is a vast cataclysmic difference between "God" and "a higher transcendent power." The God of the Bible was petty and vengeful. As for humanity, there is random beauty and suffering so the nature of this higher power remains a mystery.
Anyway my main point here is that the scientists who are theists are likely not referring to the God of the Bible in their belief systems.
One set at a time - you have to believe there is a God to make you decide to read the Bible- and be open to the LESSONS of the Bible (I never liked when my parents punished me when I made a bad decision, but I don’t call them petty and vengeful
Like as the Lord said , Blessed are those who believe after they have seen !
I ask, why can’t existence be infinite the same way we say God is infinite?
Unless, you can answer, your reasons for God are all based on assumptions and begging the question answers.
So the first 5 min are him using fallacious reasoning... that does not bode well for the rest....
THANK YOU! I'm glad someone mentioned this!! The whole time he was talking about that so many alarm bells were going off.
There is passion but picking and choosing marginal science and walking down one narrow path to arrive at the most profound universal conclusions possible becomes absurd.
Have there been any studies on whether a soul, during an "N.D.E.", be contained in a Faraday Box"?
I trust that Father Spitzer is one of the good jesuits.
😂😂
That he is
contradiction in terms - like 'military intelligence' - both catholicism/jesuitism and military are based on control and evil.
There are no good jesuites!
The bad ones are those Jesuits who are funding the invasion at our Southern border.
With all that stated by father Spitzer, if life is found in another planet which is not that far off, what explanation would be given in terms of religious beliefs?
Oh they'll just make something else up.
@@Alkes777 , that's what I also believe, i just want to know if they have prepared in advance :)
@@warrenbuffett920 LoL
Firstly..Ad Popularum isnt evidence.The fact that lots of people believe something to be true has no bearing at all on it actually being true..Its a fallacious position.
I wonder if the increase in theists in science and medicine may be due to which cultures these people are coming from now compared to previous generations - India, the Middle East, etc...
Father, if particle radiation from the "disintegration" of Jesus's Holy Body made the Image on His holy Shroud, doesn't that mean radioactive material that once was Jesus's holy Body is still in the Shroud?
@@marcusshakur3481, Wow! Please enlighten us , O Great One.
@@marcusshakur3481 And what EXACTLY is your proof that Jesus never existed? I want to see this evidence that you are hiding.
He mentioned that we should expect to find some isotopes of calcium & chlorine produced by the radiation. Radioactive elements may have decayed by now but some products like these should remain.
The shroud is known FAKE!
@@guyhayklan4795 Atheism is a proven FAKE!
When I think that there is a god, I think of the children’s cancer center and realize there is no god.
Genesis, Quantum Physics and Reality by Peter Zoeller-Greer. How Quantum Physics proves the existence of God. ‘…leads to a new Anthropic principle - the Divine.”
Follow the science. Praised be Jesus
This is flawed logic being dished out in this video. You are getting your science from the wrong person. Expand your knowledge and think for yourself more.
How exactly is this universe primed for life? Most of the universe in uninhabitable by humans.
The fact that younger scientist believe in god points to a lack of understanding. Their knowledge will come! Time will tell!
Fr. Spitzer also quoted the scientific organizations giving out the statistics!
From what he said finite bubble universes are still a possibility so how can you say our version of s God I say the only option? If there is something we would think of as a god it does not mean it has any concern about what it creates.
My 6 year old son can tell you God exists by just looking at the night sky
Science will never prove God. If science proves God, faith would no longer be necessary to feel God. Faith is paramount to divine grace.
How convenient 😏...
Nothing proves a god exists. Nothing proves Jesus’ divinity or that he performed any miracles or actually resurrected… Nothing!
Nothing does not exist except as a concept. Nothing cannot prove anything.
He has actually Said NOTHING if you ask me and those statistics are CLEARLY wrong! Anybody provide verifiable links as sources for those statistics? I remain AGNOSTIC
will you please consider being on the Joe Rogan Experience ? I understand the challenges but the key is to get more people to think about Our Lord Jesus
Great idea!
Great idea!! I would love to see that as well, Rogan has such a large following.
So he can continue to talk without providing any evidence? Whats the point?
where can we e copy of slides?
Amazing that this is still a valid topic for discussion in 2022!
No it isn't.
@@SMacCuUladh ! Which is a problem!
@@j.whisper2379 It's a little more complex than that but I think I know what you're getting at.
Humans a prone to fantasy.
There will always be an audience for this rubbish...
@@roscius6204 ! Noproblem, as long as they keep their rubbish in their own yard~
can someone show me some peer reviewed medical studies showing that there is a high likelihood that we have a transcendent soul? Not a single citation in this whole "lecture"...
Here's a more sited source
ruclips.net/video/rlBO0Y9GJhk/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/nnTVPCwPjhI/видео.html
@science7261 How about the Bible? No I mean it. That's all he's got. Actually in the Bible it's definitive so no need for peer review.
Alkes777
Obviously, the bible NOT definitive.
Or people would believe it 🙄.
I can’t imagine the amount of energy that will be released when all of humanity is resurrected at the end of time
Not all humanity. I firmly believe we live among people from OTHER gods who are evil at heart.
@@mommaknos1136 The Bible says just as all died in Adam, all shall be made alive in Christ.
So all are saved. Some immediately, others after being purged of their sins and evil in hell.
each cell in the human body is capable of generation 1.4 volts but at a very low amperage. a person about 200 pounds in weight will look like a 100 watt firefly.
@@ThisDoctorKnows Hi Doctor, I hope and pray that hell is not eternal, but everyone I know, in my church, believes that it is. Can you give me some information of why you think that some people, who end up in hell, are there till their sins are purged? I struggle with doubts about God and how weak my faith is I think. I keep repeating the same cycle of sinning and repenting and I can't help feeling because of that I will end up in hell for all eternity. Thank you.
@@bmm9095 Check out the RUclips channel “The Total Victory of Christ”. Check out David Bentley Hart’s book “That All Shall Be Saved”. Also check out father Aiden Kimmel, David Bentley Hart, Ilaria Ramelli and Robin Parry on the topic of the salvation of all beings through Jesus Christ.
Edit: The correct name is Aiden Kimmel not Alfred Kimmel. My apologies.