The cool thing about this game is that, despite not being good at Wesker mechanically, true has enough knowledge about loops, mindgames and check spots to pull off a 3k. Really impressive stuff
@@jordannolan4008 Subhuman spotted. I feel sorry for your parents that they lost you after you hatched. Shame that they could not get a chance to raise you properly.
Survivors playing at the lowest level will always lose to killers playing at the lowest level. Survivors playing at the highest level can easily beat killer playing at the highest level.
@@sharkymcshank7777probably because they often throw just to save one of their teammates instead of just taking the 3 man out. I mean it's obvious to most of us the Devs don't understand their own game and finding them stats probably enforced their ideas that this game isn't survivor sided when stats don't tell the full story anyway.
Yup and this is the result of balancing an asymmetrical game in an symmetrical manner using flat statistics for MMR. There are fewer high elos than low elos, each kill the killer gets is counted as a survivor loss. So this makes the gradient entirely based on survivors, not killers.
You are correct. most killers WON'T want to be in high level if they got there, but they go for the 4k as often as possible and even force it with slugging, bringing them closer and closer to high level because they THINK they want that, or they don't understand the MMR system and don't think it's happening. IMO, all the killers I see that play super hardcore at my level (mid solos), really can't take it at this high level, BUT they bring the house and pub stomp their way to top level, then they run to reddit to complain about balance or flashlights. Too many players do really well against solo low MMR and get a big ego, but once they get to high MMR they likely end up punching holes in the wall.
I just climb or descend to an MMR I like and stay there by drawing every game, letting 2 survivors out. My dashes are still pretty bad so with Wesker I still need quite a bit of target practice before I go higher.
@@updatedotexe Because wins are usually more entertaining than losses? A lot of RUclipsrs post more wins than losses. You don't need to lose to demonstrate how difficult something is. He wasn't baiting, he was extremely close to losing and it was only by the skin of his teeth that he didn't, and cherry picking is a common thing for content creators because at the end of the day they want views, because views = money. Half of your statement makes no sense, and the other half is obvious and not really a bad thing. Just say you're a hater, because you're clearly searching for things to hate about when there's nothing to hate.
@@devinsmith8444 in dbd, wins are exciting for you? When you see him win for the 4000th time? He always complains about MMR and the difficulty of good survivor but yet shows it only in 90% of cases or less. Its just boring. But sure, pull out your hater card if it makes you feel better about yourself :)
The cool thing about this game is that, despite not being good at Wesker mechanically, true has enough knowledge about loops, mindgames and check spots to pull off a 3k. Really impressive stuff
Mega glazing sort your life out
@@jordannolan4008 Subhuman spotted. I feel sorry for your parents that they lost you after you hatched. Shame that they could not get a chance to raise you properly.
@@MrNorbi001 that projection is crazyyyyy, I hope you figure it all out bro best wishes, godspeed & godbless.
@@jordannolan4008 Subhuman confirmed by using "bro". Thx for confirmation.
Man it's really tough dealing with a full team who uses their exhaustion perks well
5:05 how you threw him on the basement like that, like a towel Lmaooooo
00:00 slam your sides into them when you dash
Survivors playing at the lowest level will always lose to killers playing at the lowest level.
Survivors playing at the highest level can easily beat killer playing at the highest level.
yet top mmr swfs only have a 48% winrate lol
@@sharkymcshank7777 mmr doesn’t mean your good it just means you win a lot
@@sharkymcshank7777probably because they often throw just to save one of their teammates instead of just taking the 3 man out. I mean it's obvious to most of us the Devs don't understand their own game and finding them stats probably enforced their ideas that this game isn't survivor sided when stats don't tell the full story anyway.
Yup and this is the result of balancing an asymmetrical game in an symmetrical manner using flat statistics for MMR.
There are fewer high elos than low elos, each kill the killer gets is counted as a survivor loss. So this makes the gradient entirely based on survivors, not killers.
@@iamZooomaltruism is the killers 5th perk, doesn’t activate every match lol
You are correct. most killers WON'T want to be in high level if they got there, but they go for the 4k as often as possible and even force it with slugging, bringing them closer and closer to high level because they THINK they want that, or they don't understand the MMR system and don't think it's happening.
IMO, all the killers I see that play super hardcore at my level (mid solos), really can't take it at this high level, BUT they bring the house and pub stomp their way to top level, then they run to reddit to complain about balance or flashlights. Too many players do really well against solo low MMR and get a big ego, but once they get to high MMR they likely end up punching holes in the wall.
Wesker is him
“Killer OP”
I just climb or descend to an MMR I like and stay there by drawing every game, letting 2 survivors out. My dashes are still pretty bad so with Wesker I still need quite a bit of target practice before I go higher.
"TOP LEVEL KILLER IS HARD DBD"
continues to get 3K
getting tired of the baits and cherry picking
Hard ≠ Unwinnable. Winning ≠ Easy.
@@devinsmith8444 90% of his "Hard" matches are Wins though. At least on youtube since he doesn't like to upload losses. Cherry picking as I said.
Subhuman spotted.
@@updatedotexe Because wins are usually more entertaining than losses? A lot of RUclipsrs post more wins than losses.
You don't need to lose to demonstrate how difficult something is. He wasn't baiting, he was extremely close to losing and it was only by the skin of his teeth that he didn't, and cherry picking is a common thing for content creators because at the end of the day they want views, because views = money. Half of your statement makes no sense, and the other half is obvious and not really a bad thing. Just say you're a hater, because you're clearly searching for things to hate about when there's nothing to hate.
@@devinsmith8444 in dbd, wins are exciting for you? When you see him win for the 4000th time? He always complains about MMR and the difficulty of good survivor but yet shows it only in 90% of cases or less. Its just boring. But sure, pull out your hater card if it makes you feel better about yourself :)
Crutch killer perks win you the game with one proc... boring
I hope this is sarcasm lol
I don't think crutch killer perks exist anymore
Rage bait. If this were genuine they'd just watch a different video.