"Have you ever indulged in the fantasy of a plumber rescuing a damsel from a fire-breathing monster while eating mushrooms? Look no further, my good fellow!"
@@deesire3337eh, his humor is kinda your typical "heckin' wholesum reddit moment/I am a promiscuous gay twink" (except the dukem nukem one, those are fine). Not profound, it's all shill.
Kids with these “eyes” nowadays. Back in my day, we had eyespots. Light and dark, that’s all we needed. Now you need to eat pounds of garbage that goes out the other end to keep em running and we wonder why the kids are so fat. Used to be you split by mitosis when you had enough, but no, you have to be there for the kid and coddle them for years. Not us, we were tough, we- _voice fades as grandpa’s microscope slide gets put back_
This reminds me of a very famous newspaper/magazine clipping that was circulating on the internet in my country about 15 years back. Even then, the photo was around a decade old at that point. In short, it was (I presume) from some bit where they asked senior citizens about their opinion on computers. There was a picture of a very cranky looking old woman, and next to it... "These computers will do nobody any good. I would ban all of those internets." No, that's not a typo. Internets, plural. In rough translation.
@@Ryan-dz4si Didn't say it did, nor am I a socialist, but the idea of abstracting the material reality and losing something in the process is part of the thesis.
One thing my father noticed is that different generation take photos differently. Young people take photos of themselves with the subject of the photo. While older people take photos of subject by itself. Millennials and younger take pictures of people while people older take pictures of things. This excludes people who take a picture of everything for their Instagram.
When you've seen a photo of something, it makes seeing the real thing less impressive. I went to the Dhali museum and kept having to remind myself I was looking at the original paintings and not a copy. But on the other hand, we get to see things we'd never see otherwise.
@@TurtleShroom3 He didn't deny that, he said that seeing a photo + the real thing made the real thing less impressive, even if impressive. It's understandable, it's the biggest form of spoiler that can exist.
I really do wonder what people like this would've thought of the progression of the tech. What would they think of digital screens. The games we play now are so clean they might as well be eyes themselves. Those flight simulators have high quality mountain facades in them; would he reject the false mountain? Recorded video might just send him over the edge. Stealing away real moments of time into our little tablets.
@@bat6353 I mean more in the point that the luster and grandeur of these places is greatly reduced, as you can "see" them with so little effort. Not that this is a terrible thing (being able to see so much that normally one couldnt is pretty neat)
I can't wait for Burialgoods to do a version of this for Diogenes, presenting _"Plato's _*_Man"._* Or maybe "Plato's mountain", complete with _"Get out of my light."_
There is a point to be made about living vicariously through images other people capture of their life, instead of experiencing life yourself, but this post ain't making that point chief.
I love how he decided to put the "getting laid" at the end of whatever this rant was, as if saying that those who like cameras get no bitches, just to cement his point about how absolutely stupid the concept of viewing an artificially recreated image is, despite being harmless at first glance.
The audio diaries of Alistair Grout would be a PERFECT mini series or a longer video for you. Tho the original style is not far from your's, and a masterpiece on it's own, i think them being covered by you would be quite interesting.
Honestly is this even a joke at this point? Because I'm sure plenty of people back then genuinely agreed with this. Some people literally thought cameras stole your soul from your body and put them in the photograph.
@@TurtleShroom3 I mean not really. The idea is that people will use photographs as a substitute for actually experiencing the world. While there are real world analogs with people who just sit in their basement and play videogames all day, I think the advent of image and video capturing technologies have done far more good for tourism and related industries than bad. When I see a video of people having fun on a beach in Hawaii, I don't think "Well, I've seen it all, might as well never go there" I think "Wow, that looks fun, I would love to go there someday if I could". I imagine most people think the same way.
Has anyone noticed the change in name from "burialgods" to "burialgoods"? I remember very well reading "burialgods" everytime I had one of his videos on my appear on my youtube page.
Okay, but the guy has a totally legitimate point and I agree with him: a photograph cannot substitute real experience, and no portrait can exceed the camera of the eye.
Like the camera, and like the microphone, AI is useful as it's intended purpose, a tool. People prattling on about deepfakes and such seem to forget just how far back image and audio tampering goes.
not even gonna credit the author of this Work, welcometomymemepage? i only found You from your asking for credit on a video by dorbol. you should Practice what you Preach, unless you, in fact, Are welcometomymemepage
I imagine On “Video Games” would be at least 3 times as many paragraphs.
I think “playing video games” would be funnier as a punchline than “getting Laid,” but the latter is more in-character.
“If you like call of duty, go enlist!”
Postal players:
"See this is why I write a blog about how I hate the video game industry, it just appeals to the male fantasy."
>You are Well-Rested
@@15braincellsremaining too real
"Have you ever indulged in the fantasy of a plumber rescuing a damsel from a fire-breathing monster while eating mushrooms? Look no further, my good fellow!"
Just wait until this dude finds out about "Microphones"
ohh its so joever
furry pfp: degenerate
And a weird thing called "youtube". He will truly be mad
"May they fall headfirst into the hell they have created and tell themselves they are in Egypt."
That's actually a pretty good line right there.
Burialgoods is the best RUclips voice dubber in memes, stories, poems and everything in else.
Fax
Hey Gianni is good too!
@@deesire3337eh, his humor is kinda your typical "heckin' wholesum reddit moment/I am a promiscuous gay twink" (except the dukem nukem one, those are fine). Not profound, it's all shill.
@@deesire3337 no, he's soy
Kids with these “eyes” nowadays. Back in my day, we had eyespots. Light and dark, that’s all we needed.
Now you need to eat pounds of garbage that goes out the other end to keep em running and we wonder why the kids are so fat. Used to be you split by mitosis when you had enough, but no, you have to be there for the kid and coddle them for years. Not us, we were tough, we- _voice fades as grandpa’s microscope slide gets put back_
Very erudite way of explaining "This is not a pipe"
This why those fools will never get laid.
(This is a bilingual joke)
Now where could my pipe be?
He really said "Them Gizmos and tinkerers are *maidenless* "
This guy is such an enlightened thinker that he even is against books, somehow.
I legit thought this was an actual article or letter written by some ancient dude until I saw the last bit and realized it was a meme.
Same.
This must be one of Socrates descendents.
I agree. This is Phaedrus.mp4
This reminds me of a very famous newspaper/magazine clipping that was circulating on the internet in my country about 15 years back. Even then, the photo was around a decade old at that point.
In short, it was (I presume) from some bit where they asked senior citizens about their opinion on computers.
There was a picture of a very cranky looking old woman, and next to it...
"These computers will do nobody any good.
I would ban all of those internets."
No, that's not a typo. Internets, plural.
In rough translation.
"And getting laid" got me. 😂
With laid capitalized, lol!!!
wait until this dude finds out about "drawings"
This has Society of the Spectacle energy lol
The video doesn't contain a critique of capitalism, tho.
@@Ryan-dz4si Didn't say it did, nor am I a socialist, but the idea of abstracting the material reality and losing something in the process is part of the thesis.
Also very much like amusing ourselves to death
@@theeccentrictripper3863 Good point!
One thing my father noticed is that different generation take photos differently. Young people take photos of themselves with the subject of the photo. While older people take photos of subject by itself. Millennials and younger take pictures of people while people older take pictures of things. This excludes people who take a picture of everything for their Instagram.
I must be older than I thought. I hate having my picture taken but love a nice photograph of nature, mountains and the like.
It’s a performance of contentment, the modern equivalent of the Stepford smile or the Bri’ish stiff upper lip.
@@animeking1357 i still remember the time when selfies were a feminine trait, especially if it's supposed to be an image of an object
@@stefanstraka7517feminine? I thought that it was a self-absorbed trait.
Well both are correct on average. Feminine do include self absorb trait depending on where you are.
This guy's idea of a slippery slope is a 90° incline.
You had me at oatmeal and valium
Traditional purist detected
I love burialgoods 🥰
Bro predicted me scrolling my phone on my room at 1am
When you've seen a photo of something, it makes seeing the real thing less impressive. I went to the Dhali museum and kept having to remind myself I was looking at the original paintings and not a copy. But on the other hand, we get to see things we'd never see otherwise.
I disagree. It's always better to see it yourself.
@@TurtleShroom3 He didn't deny that, he said that seeing a photo + the real thing made the real thing less impressive, even if impressive. It's understandable, it's the biggest form of spoiler that can exist.
I really do wonder what people like this would've thought of the progression of the tech. What would they think of digital screens. The games we play now are so clean they might as well be eyes themselves. Those flight simulators have high quality mountain facades in them; would he reject the false mountain?
Recorded video might just send him over the edge. Stealing away real moments of time into our little tablets.
19th century way of saying "touch grass"
it is my RIGHT to take my memories with me when i go if i should so choose
if i could go back in time id take pictures of ancient civilization people and tell them i stole their soul
"Laid" capital L
"Papers" capital P.
Yeah haha but this was fully unironically the view at one point
That ending was like a sweet icing on the savory stew.
And the cycle continues…
....I mean, there is a point to be had here
No, there really isn't. Nobody looks at a photo of Mount Everest and thinks "Wow, I'm actually up here!" Not one person in history.
@@bat6353 I mean more in the point that the luster and grandeur of these places is greatly reduced, as you can "see" them with so little effort. Not that this is a terrible thing (being able to see so much that normally one couldnt is pretty neat)
who wrote that? and when?
The getting laid leads me to believe it's a shitpost.
Classic burialgoods making me question things that I don't wanna but I should.
Camera obscura.
Holy mother of based
He would have a heart attack if he saw a phone
I have experienced my life
They have only observed theirs.
And what do you have to show for it? *trollface*
Six of one and half a dozen of the other
Where is the lie though
I can't wait for Burialgoods to do a version of this for Diogenes, presenting _"Plato's _*_Man"._* Or maybe "Plato's mountain", complete with _"Get out of my light."_
“And getting Laid” DAMNNNNN
I'm... I'm so fucking high right now. What the hell
this dude sounds exactly like the brain dude from berserk
Nobody;
three dimensional holograms;
You should do a voiceover of the poem in Vermis by Plastiboo, the one with the corpse kneeling beside the well. Totally your vibe I think
This feels so copypasta-able, particularly in regards to the whole AI art theft debate.
There is a point to be made about living vicariously through images other people capture of their life, instead of experiencing life yourself, but this post ain't making that point chief.
cameras are just the Tinkers way of ensnaring us in Plato's Cave, got it
You should read SCP entries.
No he's kinda spitting facts though
This entire shit post but unironically
2nd time watching vid by accident seconds after upload
A sophisticated response wrought with just enough refined vitriol, befitting such an irate gentleman.
How can cameras be real if mirrors aren't real?
When is this from, the 1850s?
Where do you find these things?
Im pretty sure these are from Welcome to my meme page
I voice his memes often
You'll have a million subscribers by this time next year.
Who let Big D discover RUclips? And yea, screw the Technocracy
Hunter the Parenting reference?
The eyes of the upper world...
Ah, 'media', such humbug!
I LOVE BURIALGOODS, I LOVE BURIALGOODS
What did i just hear
This is some Luddite posting right here
Based
Philistine behavior
I'd like to know if this is taken from history, or if it's a modern piece.
This was written by WTMMP in 2015, and voiced by me a month ago
Xamera
Did I hear 'Monoliths!?'
Black Mirror.
_Ceci n'est pas une pipe._
The desiring machine plugs into the recording machine which plugs into the producing machine
I love how he decided to put the "getting laid" at the end of whatever this rant was, as if saying that those who like cameras get no bitches, just to cement his point about how absolutely stupid the concept of viewing an artificially recreated image is, despite being harmless at first glance.
Absolutely.
The audio diaries of Alistair Grout would be a PERFECT mini series or a longer video for you. Tho the original style is not far from your's, and a masterpiece on it's own, i think them being covered by you would be quite interesting.
Honestly is this even a joke at this point? Because I'm sure plenty of people back then genuinely agreed with this. Some people literally thought cameras stole your soul from your body and put them in the photograph.
He has a point even now.
@@TurtleShroom3 I mean not really. The idea is that people will use photographs as a substitute for actually experiencing the world. While there are real world analogs with people who just sit in their basement and play videogames all day, I think the advent of image and video capturing technologies have done far more good for tourism and related industries than bad. When I see a video of people having fun on a beach in Hawaii, I don't think "Well, I've seen it all, might as well never go there" I think "Wow, that looks fun, I would love to go there someday if I could". I imagine most people think the same way.
@@saucevc8353
I completely agree, and that does kind of segue back to my own point, in a way.
You CANNOT substitute seeing it yourself.
Has anyone noticed the change in name from "burialgods" to "burialgoods"? I remember very well reading "burialgods" everytime I had one of his videos on my appear on my youtube page.
It's always been burialgoods
Nope. Mandela Effect.
@@burialgoods Oh my.
@@burialgoods No he changed it. I have a photograph of it. Would you like to see it fellow Tinkerer?
25 seconds I have never seen a video so early.
And yet, Atlas Shrugged.
Very true
i agree
balling
This kinda sounds like arguments against ai
A wise man once said “he who smelt it, delt it.”
Clocks and mirrors are the devils greatest weapons.
Word to ya mutha
Only if you break mirrors.
Okay, but the guy has a totally legitimate point and I agree with him: a photograph cannot substitute real experience, and no portrait can exceed the camera of the eye.
People who hate AI are akin to this
Like the camera, and like the microphone, AI is useful as it's intended purpose, a tool. People prattling on about deepfakes and such seem to forget just how far back image and audio tampering goes.
first?
Third
not even gonna credit the author of this Work, welcometomymemepage? i only found You from your asking for credit on a video by dorbol. you should Practice what you Preach, unless you, in fact, Are welcometomymemepage
It's in the description
@@burialgoods am i the blindest man alive or did you only just add it