Color Blindness 3: Color Science.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
  • The tools of Color Science give us deeper understanding of color vision and color deficiency. Confusion Lines show sets of colors that look the same. Neutral Points. Brief review of Color Matching, Color Space and Chromaticity Diagram.

Комментарии • 12

  • @ccsnd77
    @ccsnd77 2 года назад +1

    Absolutely fantastic explanation and slides! Thank you - you make a very complex subject much easier to comprehend. I entirely disagree with the comment about too much redundancy. Many of us sincerely appreciate the manner in which you review the basics from your previous videos because it provides a broader context in which we can understand the newer topics better. Thank you for the fabulous lecture series on color vision!

  • @RMoribayashi
    @RMoribayashi 10 лет назад +2

    This is without exception the best explanation of color vision deficiency I have yet found on the web. My only criticism is the enormous amount of redundant material. Removing the 50% episode review and previews the entire series could be reduced to two 10 minute videos. This is also true for your color vision series. The original material would fit into two or three videos. While I think I understand the reasons for stretching it out like a college lecture, a condensed versions of your color vision and colorblindness videos would be an excellent addition to science on the web and more suited to the nature of modern video instruction. I picked this episode to comment on because it contains nearly all the relevant information. It is the heart of the series from which you could base two condensed videos on.
    PS. I found it ironic that you often used Van Gough as examples. Recent studies suggest he may have been colorblind, resulting in the riotous palette he used. Being a protanope I never noticed his unusual use of color. They simply look like advanced Impressionists works to me.
    Thank you again for such a clear description of both topics.

  • @cbeyedr
    @cbeyedr  10 лет назад +2

    Thank you for your comment. My intent was to make each episode function as a stand alone, but I take your point and will try to limit redundant info in the future.
    Also, appreciate the note on Van Gogh which was new to me. In searching I found a commentary on Webvision (from Univ of Utah) you might find interesting.

  • @ashleylemonds7615
    @ashleylemonds7615 3 года назад

    Thank you so much for making this series, it's wonderful!

  • @cbeyedr
    @cbeyedr  11 лет назад +1

    Tried to do it myself with graphics program, gradient fill,.... Gave up and used public domain version from Wiki.

  • @cbeyedr
    @cbeyedr  10 лет назад +3

    Good catch. That was meant to be "trichromat," instead of tritanope.
    Sorry about that.

    • @cbeyedr
      @cbeyedr  10 лет назад

      Just added an annotation correction to the video.

    • @edwinjohn4472
      @edwinjohn4472 5 лет назад

      Same at 6:34

  • @volpedo2000
    @volpedo2000 Месяц назад

    What I always struggle to understand is how can we tell which colours Protanoos or Deuteranopes. I get lines of confusion and how everything from red to green more or less looks the same to them but what colour do they see?

  • @albedoshader
    @albedoshader 10 лет назад

    See (5:12). I thought tritanopia was a colour deficiency by itself, meaning a lack of s cones. So how could a tritanope be fully functioning?

  • @xalice91
    @xalice91 11 лет назад

    What software did you use to plot the chromaticity diagram?

    • @danzk
      @danzk 4 года назад

      Looks like R