Adam pretending to be the biggest FNAF fan, but going like "my excitement made me forget to finish any of the games" reminds me that Hard-drive article that goes: "Huge Earthbound Fan Excited to Play It For the First Time".
@@alanbossdon1386 She really doesn't though? It's a completely different inflection, and they don't even sound like the same gender of child. Balloon Boy's voice is... a boy. A very young boy, but a boy nonetheless. The girl sounds like a girl.
If you look up the Jim Henson creature company, it clearly states on wikipedia that they use CG digital puppetry in their work. It could be a combination of both.
4:45 He isn't wrong to say that. since Scott Coffin did rewrote the script a couple of times. which on the one hand I do appreciate that the guy is willing to change up the work to make the story better. But on the other hand too much of that, only make's him Difficult to work with. Especially when he can't make up his own mind on the Movie. So I'm a little bit split on this topic.
note for adum: the costumes are made in cooperation with the Jim Henson Company, they themselves got approval from Scott and began modeling. We got some of our first sneak peeks of their handiwork in late 2022. from pictures it does seem like there's actual puppetry at work for some of the animatronic movements. so yes, the chat member was right, it is REALLY good costumes and puppetry by Jim Henson Company WITH CGI for extra effects.
I think the reason the puppets look so fake is just that they're made so closely to the game models. It's a similar problem to the practical elements prequels, which still looked cg due to the sleek production design.
@@theblobconsumes4859 not much really. There were some bhts photos that came out a few days ago and the animatronics basically look the same. Glowing eyes and all.
I’m sure they’re a mix of CGI and the real suits. they wouldn’t be able to actually walk around if they were only suits (animatronics are usually nailed to the ground or base of whatever they’re on)
You need to watch more puppeteering, my friend. The Jim Henson company has made several puppet suits that can walk. Big Bird, Sweetums, The Gorgs, Dinosaurs, the list goes on.
Judging this trailer, they are definitely burying the lead on the familial connection with Mike Schmidt and “Steve Raglan.” Making it a plot twist for newer viewers. Can’t wait for MatPat to lose his mind over this.
@@luiginastro8831 Clearly, you must be new to FNAF. Well strap in, the movie is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of the Lore we were given for years.
@@sambeaman7043 Dormitabis is shock/edge factor. The VHS series tries to be scary and atmospheric and doesn't throw in a jumpscare or gore every five seconds. Tbf, The Walten Files is the scarier version of FNAF but you get my point.
"So there are ghost children possessing giant robots?" "Thanks for the heads up" Lay all the horror and mystery out into a terrible marvel quip. Sure why not. Have trailer houses completely given up now? Why is almost every movies marketing hot trash?
I agree that the line can come across as lame, but cmon... mystery? "Haunted animatronics" is just the basic premise, of a game that came out 10 years ago. Everyone who'd be interested in the movie would know that already
@tevenpowell8023 Disagree. There was at least some level of mystery to what was happening with the robots. Just because youtube theorists milked it for years doesn't mean everyone knows it all by default. This movie is going to be the introduction for a lot of people. It shouldn't be written like an in joke with zero weight or horror
They really messed up the looks of the animatronics. I hate these instances of crafted practical effects, covered in a layer of bad cgi. It happened to the mcu spiderman suits, and The Thing prequel. Tragic
@@josef-ralfdwerlkotte8333 They resemble the game as far as the colours and proportions go. But terms of detail, lighting, atmosphere, believability, etc? Fuck no. The movie looks super sterile and plain, zero real grit or atmosphere to it. Fnaf games t least had the look of grungy png/jpegs for everything that made it stand out, this looks like a disney live action remake lol
@@josef-ralfdwerlkotte8333 That is the most juvenile argument ever. So nobody's allowed to voice a negative opinion? By your logic, you shouldn't be commenting on Adam's reaction since you disagree with what he has to say right? As you grow up, you'll find freedom of expression goes both ways. Criticism keeps things improving, sorry if you wanna live in lala land where you never have to disagree with someone and nobody has to try or put effort in. When a movies in development hell for that long, usually means the movie is troubled and not well put together. It's not because they spent 8 years crafting the best possible story they could lol
It doesn't look great at all, but I'm excited to see it anyway out of curiosity and if it's somehow better than expected - saying that, I tried watching Emma Tammi's 'The Wind' and it was so dull and meaningless I turned it off so we'll see
@@tevenpowell8023 My 100+ hours in fnaf 1 strongly disagree. The games are really fun for me and I am hopeful that the movie will be fun too. It doesn't look scary to me but seeing the same four furry fuckers jump across my screen for years kinda makes it hard for me to see them as creepy again.
@@ivebenhere1843 On second thought maybe I was only thinking of the newer games not being very good. The first four still hold up very well. And on third thought maybe I was only thinking of Security Breach. Because that game is pretty widely considered to be a pretty bad game, but fan engagement on SB is still super High.
Apparently The Jim Henson a Creature Shop did help making the Animatronics. That being said they probably did the same thing like Spider-Man Homecoming where they purposely made them look CG. That totally possible. Edit: I honestly didn't noticed that they're are CG looking, They looked like they were guy's in suits, But maybe that's just me.
Yes, Jim Henson's made the animatronics. They also have suit versions for people to wear for the "harder to move" scenes and mix of puppetry. No CGI btw. The red glowing eyes and the squinting is all Jim Henson's.
Behind the scenes photos do show guys in suits, of course it’s not done that way for the entirety of the film but it is done practically for some of it, if not most
I'm boycotting this movie out of principle since they're not giving James House the recognition he deserves for being the true creator of this franchise.
YMS has such a low opinion of the filmmakers behind the FNAF movie, it's almost like he thinks the series is nothing but cheap horror trash for children and this movie will just continue that trend.
I was going to muse on how bizarre it is that we’re getting a theatrical-release feature length movie based on an ipad game for 11 year olds but then I remembered we’ve already gotten a movie about Angry Birds.
@@Sir.btcbrbIt is horror for younger audiences, but there's nothing wrong with older people having an interest in the series. It's somewhat difficult to determine when FNaF really started to appeal to kids, but Security Breach is when it was most obvious, from the lazier jumpscares to the animatronics having personalities, which they didn't have in the Clickteam games. It's obvious that FNaF is for younger kids at this point, since the novels are published by Scholastic.
The real way that environments are lit is by light bouncing all around the room, obsorbed and reflected in different quantities by each surface. Therefore, when you see me, I am lit not only by the source of light, but by the light which bounces in my direction from all the other objects. In CGI, the light which illuminates an object is usually exclusively from the source, and the difference in these two kinds of lighting is how our brains get "the feeling" that something is CG; that little almost indescribable but subvonsciously noticeable difference.
That's not true at all. Professional CG renders have used massively complicated lighting since the 90s. That's the entire reason why it takes 15 million years to render all of the scenes in the first place. If it only used one light source then everything would look like a stylized illustration with perfectly black shadows.
@@schoombooliobihim Well, I decided to do some checking, and yeah; "path tracing" which maps out the path of bouncing photons, is pretty standard in film these days. It's video games where it has yet to be fully utilized (but might be soon thanks to advancements incorporated into Unreal Engine). So, 10 points to gryffindor.
Holy shit is that Adam's webcam? therefore proving this video is commentary and does not serve as a replacement for the original content??? big epic poggers moment
@AluminumFusion22 1-3 were kinda dark, but then it became super cartoony and pretentious. Yeah, even those 3 games had some cheesy jokes here and there, but at least there were no "exotic butters".
@thelostmessenger to this day, I still wonder of all the great things about the first games were intentional or not. I wouldn't be surprised if the first game captured the uncanny valley perfectly due to its low budget and nothing more.
@@N.I.A23 Five Nights at Freddy's worked due to the game's low-budget aesthetic, dark lighting, good sound design, vague story, the usage of the uncanny valley, and how certain aspects of the game like the hallucinations and Golden Freddy didn't have an explanation, as Scott even smartly said in interviews that he "couldn't explain Golden Freddy."
Always love to see rando horror RUclipsrs with a budget barely reaching $100 do an infinitely better job at horror than full on studios. The VHS tapes series on this website is super creative, even if you don't particularly find it scary the quality of work is great. And here we have a film that looks EXACTLY like the ripoff crappy jumpscare fests that all came out to copy FNAF's success, like this is indistinguishable from the one where Nick Cage beats up a robot gorilla in the men's restroom.
man im glad y'all aren't making this movie, a vhs fnaf movie would SUCK ASS💀 it would be very boring and slow too, also i dont see why ur complaining about a movie that isn't out yet, like wait until it comes out at least lmao
@@Flo.2005. Can you chill and not put words in my mouth? I didn't say I wanted a VHS FNAF movie, I said the series on YT was more creative. And also if you're not allowed to decide whether or not you're gonna like a movie based off it's trailer, whats the point of watching trailers? Like why are you here and not just googling a list of upcoming movies if the only information we're allowed to gather is "a movie is coming and it will contain scenes"
This is going to suck not because it’s fnaf one the trailer looks bad if I had no idea what fnaf was I’d assume this was a parody of over used horror tropes and because of the worker strikes in Hollywood
Good news for adum, since he's such a fan. There's plenty of sequel potential since it's a garbage movie that will make money off of brand recognition...I mean because it looks neat.
I can already see this being another Mario Movie situation. Any criticism you make, people will jump at you with: "IT'S THE FNAF MOVIE WHAT DID YOU EXPECT" "WHY DO YOU HAVE TO BE SO NEGATIVE" "DON'T YOU KNOW THE EFFORT THEY PUT INTO THIS" "WHY CAN'T YOU LET PEOPLE ENJOY THINGS"
Most people don't even say they can't enjoy it. They're just too sensitive and insecure that any criticism is twisted by their manchildren mind into a hate speech.
@@thatguyonline-mc9ys I’m not saying they shouldn’t. It’s just that when someone critiques a movie that has a very passionate fanbase, and the critique is negative, they defend it with tooth and nail, as if the guy who made the critique is trying to force people to not enjoy the movie. This will happen with the Fnaf movie, anyone who doesn’t like it will be called “hater” and “negative” and people will claim they are trying to make people hate it.
@@charlesn.2881 Famous youtuber for his let’s plays on horror games including the early prime of FNAF. He has 16 million plus subscribers and up there as RUclips’s best let’s players
@@cloudshines812 In fairness, I'm quite confident Dream was manifested onto the platform by some eldritch entity's guttural rumblings already having like 6 million subscribers, the existence of a large youtuber does not mean their content will ever actually reach you if their niche is sufficiently detached from you
@@misirtere9836 That’s true. But in some regard, people are at least still aware of a bigger RUclipsr even if they haven’t watched their content. I cannot tell you the amount of people who have not seen Markiplier but still know who he is
@@cloudshines812 Not really a fair comparison, because Markiplier is so many leagues above almost everyone else on the platform. He's in the top 100 most subscribed channels ever, and that includes the ones that really shouldn't count like RUclips Music or RUclips Movies. Also, Markiplier has been in several distinct internet memes. "E", WAS THAT THE BITE OF '87, him running into the room and violently punching you, memes keep spawning that feature him in them but spread outside of his own community.
@@CheesyBoorger well the design is good and does look like in the games but they dont look real or like they are in the scene. The lighting is off and dont look natural. If they did have real props i dont know what they did to it in the trailer because they look faker then the first game where they where just renders
@@sammythemutt3849 They're practical, you can check some behind the scenes photos. They look fantastic to me tbh so I don't really get what you're saying. I mean we're so used to having cgi everywhere nowadays that when people see real stuff they still think it's cgi (good example here is the giraffe in tlou)
@@CheesyBoorger Honestly thats what cracks me up so much about Adum in this review, swearing that the suits are covered up with CGI. Theres been so many BTS photo leaks not to mention the Dawko/8bit vlogs talking about being on set, seeing the animatronics movie on stage, the suits interacting with them, and watching the suits being maneuvered in person. This is what happens when the Jim Henson Company puts a lot of effect into their work -- they make hyper-realistic animatronics 🤷 but who does research anymore am I right lol.
Idc if i get ragged on for this, but I'm annoyed at how Adam makes fun of bad child acting so much. A lot of it is bad yeah, but they're kids. They shouldn't even be acting. Movie looks bad though. 95% chance it'll be pg-13 so that the FNAF fanbase can watch it, meaning all of the deaths will be "implied"/off screen. The creepy kids scenes also felt really cliche. That taxi scene makes me think there'll be some cheesy attempts at comedy. Hopefully I'm wrong
It’s weird how Adam criticises child performances. A child is obviously going to be in a haunted children’s restaurant movie and they aren’t going to be good actors.
He has stated multiple times that when he is criticizing a bad child performance, he is not meaning anything towards the child themself. Rather he is critiquing the Director and staff for either hiring a kid who didn't have the chops and/or for giving them poor direction because they don't know how to work well with kids.
@@VagabondRetroI don’t see it being as bad of a thing. If the movie has the child do and say a lot it’s understandable. Child acting seems like thing excuse able to some extent because most directors direct actors not children.
@@duskplains1235 I think this is a disservice to the child actors who can act. It's just that many children struggle with putting themselves in someone else's mindset (since they are not even all that self-aware to begin with) and that's a huge part of acting.
The comments section on the actual trailer is super suspicious. 999% sure they’re paid for because a lot of them say the same positive thing in the same way.
The first game blew up to begin with because the monsters looked like grimy animatronics that could reasonably exist, so disappointed that they didn't even try for the movie. I've seen better looking and better composited godamn SFM models on RUclips 🤦🏽♀️
Adam pretending to be the biggest FNAF fan, but going like "my excitement made me forget to finish any of the games" reminds me that Hard-drive article that goes:
"Huge Earthbound Fan Excited to Play It For the First Time".
Or more recently, the current state of r/crueltysquad
@@moronicalmeister Or Fear and Hunger
Like how my daughters are huge Grogu fans but have no idea what Mandalorian is
@@fromvault801Um, his name is Baby Yoda 🤦♀️🤦🏻🤦🏿🤦🏾🤦🏼♂️
Im pretty sure they chose the child actor based on who sounded most like balloon boy saying hello.
That was also my thought, she sounds like it!
@@alanbossdon1386 She really doesn't though? It's a completely different inflection, and they don't even sound like the same gender of child. Balloon Boy's voice is... a boy. A very young boy, but a boy nonetheless. The girl sounds like a girl.
@@misirtere9836the hello is a boy, but BB’s hi is a girl.
Adding a character for one line isn’t really a good move.
The biggest twist would be if Adum actually unironically loves the movie
It’s gonna be a 9/10 and his favourite movie of the year I’m calling it
He's gonna make it his entire personality, forget horse Adum he will now be a bear
That's the funniest thing I heard in all the year
A good Blumhouse movie would indeed be quite the twist...
Adum when a kid in a movie doesn’t die: 😡
Thats the only good part of any film
The best part is when Mike said: "I have to stay for five nights at this place. Five nights at Freddy's." Really sent chills down my spine.😨😨
“wow dude, mike rock”
adum being convinced its cgi despite the jim henson creature company straight-up making the animatronics is painful
Yeah it's irritating to say the least lol
"covered in cg" means they used both. to make movement smoother and less puppety usually.
If you look up the Jim Henson creature company, it clearly states on wikipedia that they use CG digital puppetry in their work. It could be a combination of both.
To be fair they do look pretty bad, I suspect it's an actual animatronic but they've done some CGI tweaks and overlayed it on top or something
But if it looks like cgi, which it does, then it doesn't matter if it's real animatronics.
Watch YMS give the FNAF movie a 2 out of 10.
Well, if it deserves it, then he should.
Good
it looks like a 2/10, but ill probably enjoy it enough for a 5
Is that a bad thing?
1/10
I'm praying Adam does a watch long or an Adam and pals
It's going to be a watch long probably, though scoot and pals would be better
4:45 He isn't wrong to say that. since Scott Coffin did rewrote the script a couple of times. which on the one hand I do appreciate that the guy is willing to change up the work to make the story better. But on the other hand too much of that, only make's him Difficult to work with. Especially when he can't make up his own mind on the Movie.
So I'm a little bit split on this topic.
note for adum:
the costumes are made in cooperation with the Jim Henson Company, they themselves got approval from Scott and began modeling. We got some of our first sneak peeks of their handiwork in late 2022. from pictures it does seem like there's actual puppetry at work for some of the animatronic movements. so yes, the chat member was right, it is REALLY good costumes and puppetry by Jim Henson Company WITH CGI for extra effects.
Will this be a clean sweep on "The Best Scariest Spookiest Horror Movie" on the next 420 Awards which will come out ten years from now?
Highlights channel, oh, how we missed you!
Matthew Lillard is a treasure. Protect him at all costs!
he's great in every movie he's in. he is my pfp because he is such a legend
I think the reason the puppets look so fake is just that they're made so closely to the game models. It's a similar problem to the practical elements prequels, which still looked cg due to the sleek production design.
It actually does include CGI on top.
@@theblobconsumes4859 not much really. There were some bhts photos that came out a few days ago and the animatronics basically look the same. Glowing eyes and all.
true. they look to plasticey at times and the terrible lighting doesn't help either
I’m sure they’re a mix of CGI and the real suits. they wouldn’t be able to actually walk around if they were only suits (animatronics are usually nailed to the ground or base of whatever they’re on)
What a bizarre comment.
@@clanofclams2720 I’m going to lick your face and there’s nothing you can do about it.
You need to watch more puppeteering, my friend. The Jim Henson company has made several puppet suits that can walk. Big Bird, Sweetums, The Gorgs, Dinosaurs, the list goes on.
Some of the animatronics actually have out of shot rails that they glide over. But must of the shots of them moving are people in suits.
Adam after the release: ‘uh yeah so I’m giving FiveK at Fazbears a 3/10 it’s closer to a 2 than a 4’
I'm at a point where the 4K rants are what I'm hyped about the most with these reaction videos
where's the timestamp for Adam saying he'd bang the animatronics
They have the souls of children in them.
@@YMSHighlights Springtrap doesn't :)
Judging this trailer, they are definitely burying the lead on the familial connection with Mike Schmidt and “Steve Raglan.” Making it a plot twist for newer viewers. Can’t wait for MatPat to lose his mind over this.
He will not, at least about the name, Lillard was casted as (REDACTED) since he was announced, it's very unlikeable.
I genuinely have no idea what anything that's written here means. I only recognize MatPat
@@luiginastro8831 Clearly, you must be new to FNAF. Well strap in, the movie is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of the Lore we were given for years.
@@comixproviderftw_02 true
I've seen fan content that is far more adequate to instill fear into an audience
The fnaf VHS tapes for sure
Nah lol the VHS series is just shock/edge factor
@@sambeaman7043 Even so, it is far more competent than whatever te fuck this film will end up being
@@sambeaman7043 Dormitabis is shock/edge factor. The VHS series tries to be scary and atmospheric and doesn't throw in a jumpscare or gore every five seconds. Tbf, The Walten Files is the scarier version of FNAF but you get my point.
I've seen fnaf fan content more disturbing than any horror movie
Is this The Bite Of 87?
The actual quality of the movie doesn’t matter. FNAF is a bigger religion than Christianity on the Internet
Can’t wait to hear him say that these animatronics (that are not CGI) were “over animated” lol
You must be a baby who needs confirmation on what they like baby baby ha ha stinky poop ha ha
despite being practical they look like CGI honestly
@@FLOPPY1DISK but it’s not cgi
@@thatguyonline-mc9ysAnd yet they managed to make it look like bad CG
"So there are ghost children possessing giant robots?"
"Thanks for the heads up"
Lay all the horror and mystery out into a terrible marvel quip. Sure why not.
Have trailer houses completely given up now? Why is almost every movies marketing hot trash?
That line really irritated me
I agree that the line can come across as lame, but cmon... mystery?
"Haunted animatronics" is just the basic premise, of a game that came out 10 years ago. Everyone who'd be interested in the movie would know that already
@tevenpowell8023 Disagree. There was at least some level of mystery to what was happening with the robots. Just because youtube theorists milked it for years doesn't mean everyone knows it all by default.
This movie is going to be the introduction for a lot of people. It shouldn't be written like an in joke with zero weight or horror
@@NeutralGuyDoubleZero Why not?
Except at this point, it isn’t really giving away any mysteries. The fact that these animatronics are hunted is a well-known thing
They really messed up the looks of the animatronics. I hate these instances of crafted practical effects, covered in a layer of bad cgi.
It happened to the mcu spiderman suits, and The Thing prequel. Tragic
Wtf they lppk good, just like in the game?
@@josef-ralfdwerlkotte8333 They resemble the game as far as the colours and proportions go. But terms of detail, lighting, atmosphere, believability, etc? Fuck no. The movie looks super sterile and plain, zero real grit or atmosphere to it.
Fnaf games t least had the look of grungy png/jpegs for everything that made it stand out, this looks like a disney live action remake lol
@@NeutralGuyDoubleZero i respectfully disagree
@@NeutralGuyDoubleZero and if you dont like it, just dont watch it. It took 8 years for them to finaly make this and i will support them.
@@josef-ralfdwerlkotte8333 That is the most juvenile argument ever. So nobody's allowed to voice a negative opinion? By your logic, you shouldn't be commenting on Adam's reaction since you disagree with what he has to say right? As you grow up, you'll find freedom of expression goes both ways.
Criticism keeps things improving, sorry if you wanna live in lala land where you never have to disagree with someone and nobody has to try or put effort in.
When a movies in development hell for that long, usually means the movie is troubled and not well put together. It's not because they spent 8 years crafting the best possible story they could lol
It doesn't look great at all, but I'm excited to see it anyway out of curiosity and if it's somehow better than expected - saying that, I tried watching Emma Tammi's 'The Wind' and it was so dull and meaningless I turned it off so we'll see
I mean, it's not like the games themselves are super good either.
I don't think the FNAF Fandom will really care
@@tevenpowell8023 My 100+ hours in fnaf 1 strongly disagree. The games are really fun for me and I am hopeful that the movie will be fun too. It doesn't look scary to me but seeing the same four furry fuckers jump across my screen for years kinda makes it hard for me to see them as creepy again.
@@ivebenhere1843 On second thought maybe I was only thinking of the newer games not being very good. The first four still hold up very well.
And on third thought maybe I was only thinking of Security Breach. Because that game is pretty widely considered to be a pretty bad game, but fan engagement on SB is still super High.
Apparently The Jim Henson a Creature Shop did help making the Animatronics. That being said they probably did the same thing like Spider-Man Homecoming where they purposely made them look CG.
That totally possible.
Edit: I honestly didn't noticed that they're are CG looking, They looked like they were guy's in suits, But maybe that's just me.
Yes, Jim Henson's made the animatronics. They also have suit versions for people to wear for the "harder to move" scenes and mix of puppetry. No CGI btw. The red glowing eyes and the squinting is all Jim Henson's.
Behind the scenes photos do show guys in suits, of course it’s not done that way for the entirety of the film but it is done practically for some of it, if not most
Welcome back! Starting off with a short 4k rant😅
What Jaws did to pizzerias
So did they show the very end of the movie, like the gag final or post-credits scene, in the trailer?
The real FNAFs were the FNAFs that we FNAF'd along the FNAF way.
lol
I'm boycotting this movie out of principle since they're not giving James House the recognition he deserves for being the true creator of this franchise.
its honestly disgusting... any true fnaf fan will know James House was robbed and Scott Cawthon is a hack! justice for James House!
jordan*
Who tf is James House
@@tommyoriley4174 The real creator of FNAF who was fucked over by Scott Cawthorn.
i genuinely can’t tell if this is a joke or not and now i’m confused
They did a cavity search on Freddy
Glad to see you're back!
Great to have you back!
YMS has such a low opinion of the filmmakers behind the FNAF movie, it's almost like he thinks the series is nothing but cheap horror trash for children and this movie will just continue that trend.
I can't believe Sans Undertale plays Golden Freddy in this! 🤯
Dude is a high class hater😭
I was going to muse on how bizarre it is that we’re getting a theatrical-release feature length movie based on an ipad game for 11 year olds but then I remembered we’ve already gotten a movie about Angry Birds.
Blud thinks fnaf is a mobile game
@@idun_porra I know it’s on PC too but you can’t deny the popularity of the game can largely be attributed to it’s mobile port
@@donjuan2001yes, but it was PC first to my knowledge
@@donjuan2001only a fraction. And the ‘11 years old’ fnaf of fnaf would be at least 19 now. It’s not a children’s game and never was
@@Sir.btcbrbIt is horror for younger audiences, but there's nothing wrong with older people having an interest in the series. It's somewhat difficult to determine when FNaF really started to appeal to kids, but Security Breach is when it was most obvious, from the lazier jumpscares to the animatronics having personalities, which they didn't have in the Clickteam games. It's obvious that FNaF is for younger kids at this point, since the novels are published by Scholastic.
Me looking away from my phone for a few seconds: "what's methrigan?"
The real way that environments are lit is by light bouncing all around the room, obsorbed and reflected in different quantities by each surface. Therefore, when you see me, I am lit not only by the source of light, but by the light which bounces in my direction from all the other objects. In CGI, the light which illuminates an object is usually exclusively from the source, and the difference in these two kinds of lighting is how our brains get "the feeling" that something is CG; that little almost indescribable but subvonsciously noticeable difference.
That's not true at all. Professional CG renders have used massively complicated lighting since the 90s.
That's the entire reason why it takes 15 million years to render all of the scenes in the first place.
If it only used one light source then everything would look like a stylized illustration with perfectly black shadows.
@@schoombooliobihim Well, I decided to do some checking, and yeah; "path tracing" which maps out the path of bouncing photons, is pretty standard in film these days. It's video games where it has yet to be fully utilized (but might be soon thanks to advancements incorporated into Unreal Engine). So, 10 points to gryffindor.
Holy shit is that Adam's webcam?
therefore proving this video is commentary and does not serve as a replacement for the original content???
big epic poggers moment
dont usually get descriptions in the runtime
Seems like some Horse RUclipsr hasn't been doing enough studying on his FFNF lore.
When he said Kory i thought Double Toasted was in the chat. 😭
I like josh hutcherson since zathura, felt like I grew up with him
Same! I still remember seeing him in Zathura and Journey to the Center of the Earth! And then he was in Hunger Games
Journey and games he was about older yea. In bridge to terrebithia that broke my kid heart
Adum's stream camera is some serious shit
2:30 Adams fan base should be called soul sisters
Welcome back!
Not sure what anyone expects from the quality of scares.
It's neutered horror for pre teens by a guy who made Christian films before this game
A lot of people tend to forget that FNAF as a series isn't THAT dark.
@AluminumFusion22
1-3 were kinda dark, but then it became super cartoony and pretentious. Yeah, even those 3 games had some cheesy jokes here and there, but at least there were no "exotic butters".
They had subtlety but now it's pretty cartonish
@thelostmessenger to this day, I still wonder of all the great things about the first games were intentional or not. I wouldn't be surprised if the first game captured the uncanny valley perfectly due to its low budget and nothing more.
@@N.I.A23 Five Nights at Freddy's worked due to the game's low-budget aesthetic, dark lighting, good sound design, vague story, the usage of the uncanny valley, and how certain aspects of the game like the hallucinations and Golden Freddy didn't have an explanation, as Scott even smartly said in interviews that he "couldn't explain Golden Freddy."
Always love to see rando horror RUclipsrs with a budget barely reaching $100 do an infinitely better job at horror than full on studios. The VHS tapes series on this website is super creative, even if you don't particularly find it scary the quality of work is great. And here we have a film that looks EXACTLY like the ripoff crappy jumpscare fests that all came out to copy FNAF's success, like this is indistinguishable from the one where Nick Cage beats up a robot gorilla in the men's restroom.
man im glad y'all aren't making this movie, a vhs fnaf movie would SUCK ASS💀
it would be very boring and slow too, also i dont see why ur complaining about a movie that isn't out yet, like wait until it comes out at least lmao
@@Flo.2005. Can you chill and not put words in my mouth? I didn't say I wanted a VHS FNAF movie, I said the series on YT was more creative. And also if you're not allowed to decide whether or not you're gonna like a movie based off it's trailer, whats the point of watching trailers? Like why are you here and not just googling a list of upcoming movies if the only information we're allowed to gather is "a movie is coming and it will contain scenes"
Welcome back 💜
Great video bro. Cory
This is going to suck not because it’s fnaf one the trailer looks bad if I had no idea what fnaf was I’d assume this was a parody of over used horror tropes and because of the worker strikes in Hollywood
What’s his obsession with 4K man
Petitiom for the next game to include an animateonic horse called adum
0:32 4K rant skip
The trailers gives me serious Slenderman movie vibes.
Well don't worry because the game's creator is HEAVILY involved. It's going to be perfect.
I don't think they look like cgi, I don't see it
It’s not. All of the animatronics are practical by Jim Henson Company.
@@comixproviderftw_02 the Jim Henson Company uses CG additionally. Adum's comments remain factual.
I must be crazy but they look completely CG to me
@@mdude3"this looks cg" is the opposite of factual
@@clanofclams2720 but it literally uses cg. ergo it looks cg...
The animatronics were done by the Jim Henson company. If anybody can make them 100% practical, it's them.
Mathew Lillard is genuinely wonderful to watch. The Scream series is terrible but the first one is a legitimate classic and he ran that shit.
5:33 no adam, real fabs only watch the movie 😎experience the story how it was originally meant to be experienced the hole time
Good news for adum, since he's such a fan. There's plenty of sequel potential since it's a garbage movie that will make money off of brand recognition...I mean because it looks neat.
We're so back!
Holy shit, I got this trailer as an ad on my YT like a gazillion times and I always skipped it. 😅 I had NO idea, it was about FNAF... 🤭🙈🙈
I can already see this being another Mario Movie situation. Any criticism you make, people will jump at you with:
"IT'S THE FNAF MOVIE WHAT DID YOU EXPECT"
"WHY DO YOU HAVE TO BE SO NEGATIVE"
"DON'T YOU KNOW THE EFFORT THEY PUT INTO THIS"
"WHY CAN'T YOU LET PEOPLE ENJOY THINGS"
Most people don't even say they can't enjoy it. They're just too sensitive and insecure that any criticism is twisted by their manchildren mind into a hate speech.
People should be allowed to enjoy stuff though, the last one doesn’t make sense
@@thatguyonline-mc9ys I’m not saying they shouldn’t. It’s just that when someone critiques a movie that has a very passionate fanbase, and the critique is negative, they defend it with tooth and nail, as if the guy who made the critique is trying to force people to not enjoy the movie. This will happen with the Fnaf movie, anyone who doesn’t like it will be called “hater” and “negative” and people will claim they are trying to make people hate it.
@@edrick106 ur right, the fnaf fan base has such a bad rep it’s irredeemable
I hope to see your reaction of the 50th anniversary exorcist movie trailer. 😂
Welcome back
This movie would've looked so much better shot on film instead of digital
Blumhoise produced whiplash!!
Fred Willard is not the same as Matthew Lilliard
R/thatsthejoke
It’s actually all practical, made by Jim Henson’s Creature Shop. Not even kidding. When I found that out, it blew my mind.
12:07 The fact that Adum has been on RUclips for 10+ years and STILL doesn’t know who Coryxkenshin is is honestly laughable.
Who the hell is that?
@@charlesn.2881 Famous youtuber for his let’s plays on horror games including the early prime of FNAF. He has 16 million plus subscribers and up there as RUclips’s best let’s players
@@cloudshines812 In fairness, I'm quite confident Dream was manifested onto the platform by some eldritch entity's guttural rumblings already having like 6 million subscribers, the existence of a large youtuber does not mean their content will ever actually reach you if their niche is sufficiently detached from you
@@misirtere9836 That’s true. But in some regard, people are at least still aware of a bigger RUclipsr even if they haven’t watched their content. I cannot tell you the amount of people who have not seen Markiplier but still know who he is
@@cloudshines812 Not really a fair comparison, because Markiplier is so many leagues above almost everyone else on the platform. He's in the top 100 most subscribed channels ever, and that includes the ones that really shouldn't count like RUclips Music or RUclips Movies.
Also, Markiplier has been in several distinct internet memes. "E", WAS THAT THE BITE OF '87, him running into the room and violently punching you, memes keep spawning that feature him in them but spread outside of his own community.
Actually the behind the scenes is that the animatronics are actually people in practical suits done by Jim Henson company.
this dude hates just to hate at certain points lmao
can’t believe Blumhouse didn’t have the backbone to give James House proper credit. really scummy considering he created the FNaF concept
alright you're the second person doing this stupid meme, where did you get it from
Isn't this misinfo? I am confused at this.
@@danieldsantiagorodriguez4955 it is
This looks so cheap and bad, feels like a fan trailer that would've been made years ago! That said it's probably gonna make a lot of money......
looks just about as good as wally's wonderland starring acclaimed actor nicholas cage.
Dass070 is down bad for monty
I know this is a baby movie, and I don't care. I'm still excited. Fnaf sweep babyyyy!!!!!
Tell me how the animatronics look worst than fan created fnaf works, like how did they even do that
Wdym, they look exactly like the way they are in the games 💀
@@CheesyBoorger well the design is good and does look like in the games but they dont look real or like they are in the scene. The lighting is off and dont look natural. If they did have real props i dont know what they did to it in the trailer because they look faker then the first game where they where just renders
@@sammythemutt3849 They're practical, you can check some behind the scenes photos. They look fantastic to me tbh so I don't really get what you're saying. I mean we're so used to having cgi everywhere nowadays that when people see real stuff they still think it's cgi (good example here is the giraffe in tlou)
@@CheesyBoorger Honestly thats what cracks me up so much about Adum in this review, swearing that the suits are covered up with CGI. Theres been so many BTS photo leaks not to mention the Dawko/8bit vlogs talking about being on set, seeing the animatronics movie on stage, the suits interacting with them, and watching the suits being maneuvered in person. This is what happens when the Jim Henson Company puts a lot of effect into their work -- they make hyper-realistic animatronics 🤷 but who does research anymore am I right lol.
@@JoJo-is-the-name most people don’t research information before watching trailers. Touch some grass bro😂
This looks...ok. It will either be terrible or watchable, it doesn't fascinate me in any way tbh
I can already tell that the child actor is going to be completely obnoxious.
The animatronics are practical, by the way
I wish Adam would AT LEAST talk about 4K trailers a little longer. Half of every video should be dedicated to studios not releasing 4k trailers.
Destiny's son is losing his mind right now.
Five Nights at Jon's
Idc if i get ragged on for this, but I'm annoyed at how Adam makes fun of bad child acting so much. A lot of it is bad yeah, but they're kids. They shouldn't even be acting.
Movie looks bad though. 95% chance it'll be pg-13 so that the FNAF fanbase can watch it, meaning all of the deaths will be "implied"/off screen. The creepy kids scenes also felt really cliche. That taxi scene makes me think there'll be some cheesy attempts at comedy. Hopefully I'm wrong
There will be cheesy comedy. It's in the games it's gonna be in the movie it's just a given
They were created by Jim Hensons creature shop
freddddddddddddy algorithm comment
It’s weird how Adam criticises child performances. A child is obviously going to be in a haunted children’s restaurant movie and they aren’t going to be good actors.
There are good child actors.
He has stated multiple times that when he is criticizing a bad child performance, he is not meaning anything towards the child themself. Rather he is critiquing the Director and staff for either hiring a kid who didn't have the chops and/or for giving them poor direction because they don't know how to work well with kids.
@@VagabondRetroI don’t see it being as bad of a thing. If the movie has the child do and say a lot it’s understandable. Child acting seems like thing excuse able to some extent because most directors direct actors not children.
@@jujutaylor2186I’m on about the majority children that are inexperienced.
@@duskplains1235 I think this is a disservice to the child actors who can act. It's just that many children struggle with putting themselves in someone else's mindset (since they are not even all that self-aware to begin with) and that's a huge part of acting.
I’ve seen a pic or two of an actor in the Freddy suit for the movie.
Love how 90% of these comments is just insufferable whining
Trailer looks not promising....
Can I just say the Banana Splits movie looks 10x better than this
The comments section on the actual trailer is super suspicious. 999% sure they’re paid for because a lot of them say the same positive thing in the same way.
Don’t you think that most people commenting there are, I don’t know, maybe fans of the franchise ?
@@CheesyBoorger How much are they paying you, you sick bastard.
@@CheesyBoorger fr like why do people automatically assume someone is a bot because they had something positive to say
I am low key convinced some of the comments on this video are hate bots
@@thatguyonline-mc9ys Oh my god they’re breeding.
clearly capitalizing off of the popularity of Netflix’s hit series ‘stranger things’, even riding its coattails
the animatronics really shouldve been real.
They… are
@@StarMemzithat’s a myth. It was confirmed to be cgi
@@Conman-albuquerque confirmed by the voices in your head
@@Conman-albuquerque What an absolute dumbass lmao.
The first game blew up to begin with because the monsters looked like grimy animatronics that could reasonably exist, so disappointed that they didn't even try for the movie. I've seen better looking and better composited godamn SFM models on RUclips 🤦🏽♀️