Beautifully said. Perhaps not everyone is ready to hear this, but all of us have the option to face reality as it is and let go of illusions, including the illusion of the self as a real "something" or separate entity who thinks they are going attain or get or know or become something special, in the future. (somehow overlooking all that is, here and now)
Imagine reality with-out any ideas,thoughts,words,or concepts, what reason would there be to believe,that there is anything other than what you are aware of? What evidence is there ,that there is anything other than what you are aware of?
if there is no "I", whether the "I" is person or infinite awareness or consciousness or spirit or God or whatever, who would care? There is only no-thing appearing as everything. Thanks. It was another nail on the spot on my apparently happening story.
You're Fired. Sounds a bit Trump like. Funny Stuff! I love your videos Andreas. Empty to Empty. So blessed Full of Empty. Freedom for no one. The only 'real' freedom.
Oh no if you listen to what's being said there is "No One" to be anti anything and the whole Guru disciple story is as much Wholeness as anything else...
It would be nice to redefine consciousness/awareness. Whatever statement is made, including the statement that 'this is everything' there is a knowing of this to be so. This non-verbal knowing is alive with no need for knowledge. This aliveness is sometimes called universal consciousness or awareness. In the Tony Parsons tradition, these terms are denied because of some false conclusions that may arise when using these terms. However, it is silly to maintain that there is no awareness since nothing can be perceived or said without such an aware aliveness. If this alive awareness believes that it is a separate me, then this is one of its expressions. When this expression ceases to function while continuing to express through a mind-body appearance of a human form, then an Andreas Müller happens to keep appearing.
Agreed...and as a result the ‘message’ is made needlessly obscure...as if somehow that in itself ‘apparently’ speaks to its uniqueness and specialness.
@Guard Rail It is quite evident that even 'apparent' messengers are conditioned by their past listening to other messengers; their words, the beauty of their expressions and also their lack of embracing valid terms and pointers from other traditions. By seeing beyond those shortcomings, the essence shines through these marked messages irrespectively.
@@DietrichLasa There's no Tony Parsons to be judgemental in regards to his judgements, so there's no need to change them. Only from the perspective of a seperate I ("seeing beyond those shortcomings, the essence shines through"), 'shortcomings' and 'essence' becomes meaningful.
@@curiosity_saved_the_cat Hello Curiosity, In the world of appearances, preferences continue to be expressed by any appearing action figure. Character traits remain active with all their conditioning and shortcomings on all levels of expression, mental, emotional, physical etc. They can be enjoyed ('by no-one'). You, the action figure, rather have a cup of tea with clean water than a cup of tea with dirty water. Is that meaningful? No, but it appears quite sensible. TP (the action figure) is not outside these parameters.
Kiitos Mikko näistä videoista! Pystynkö seuraamaan jostain yhdestä paikkaa milloin Jim Newman tai Andreas Müller tai joku muu vastaava on tulossa Suomeen seuraavan kerran?
Moi Tazka. Jos olet Facebookissa, voit liittyä "Nonduality Meetings" ryhmääni, jossa tiedotetaan sekä live- että online-tapahtumista. Jos et ole Facebookissa, voit silti käydä tsekkaamassa "Advaita Finland" -sivumme, jossa postaukset meidän järjestämistämme tapahtumista: facebook.com/groups/291960482047122 facebook.com/advaitafinland
Why is there a recollection of a story from the speaker Andreas? Why does he smile yet denies himself. Why does he show emotion when he never existed? What inhabits hisness. Why dont psychiatrists figure this out?
Why wouldn't there be a recollection or smiling? The self is an illusion. If the illusion stops happening, why wouldn't the brain still function (memory and facial expressions included)?
Why did this recording take place other than it just did? Why did it not take place in a park for free? Why did the speaker in Andreas die?( Because he said he died in another video) What took over Andreas' body? Why is the egoless shell animated? What is the agenda of the egoless speaker that it needs an audience? It's a type of headless chicken situation it seems. Am I right?
The animal brain creates actions in the body like it does in everybody. Only the human brain seems to imagine that there's a separate entity there. When this illusion is no longer there, the brain and body keep functioning as they always did (minus the illusion). There's no Andreas and nothing takes over.
“What is” needs no story. Or is no thing, no story. If you can remove the story, you’re left with what is. You are a story. You will always be a story.
I love to listen to these talks. But I feel like I have to say that someone there really needs to blow their nose. There always seems to be a lot of coughing in the background of these videos, too. Distribution of throat lozenges and kleenexes prior to the talks should become routine 😂
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Such a good meeting.
Great video, thank "you" even when "you" doesn't' even exist.thanks.
Good clean editing video Mikko. Thanks.
Glad you liked it! :)
Beautifully said. Perhaps not everyone is ready to hear this, but all of us have the option to face reality as it is and let go of illusions, including the illusion of the self as a real "something" or separate entity who thinks they are going attain or get or know or become something special, in the future. (somehow overlooking all that is, here and now)
There is no reality
And no you to face it
And you can not let go because there is no you to let go
And there is not a here or a now
Imagine reality with-out any ideas,thoughts,words,or concepts, what reason would there be to believe,that there is anything other than what you are aware of?
What evidence is there ,that there is anything other than what you are aware of?
Andreas could play in a horror clown movie he would be so scary
Do you think this message is more appreciated in some countries rather than others? It seems so
if there is no "I", whether the "I" is person or infinite awareness or consciousness or spirit or God or whatever, who would care? There is only no-thing appearing as everything. Thanks. It was another nail on the spot on my apparently happening story.
“... quit your job and stay in bed for months...” that’s what happened here! Think 🤔 I was just knackered from the me! 😜 Who knows? 🤷🏻♀️
You're Fired. Sounds a bit Trump like. Funny Stuff! I love your videos Andreas. Empty to Empty. So blessed Full of Empty. Freedom for no one. The only 'real' freedom.
Andreas, the anti-guru. Doesn't really like India that much. I love it!
Oh no if you listen to what's being said there is "No One" to be anti anything and the whole Guru disciple story is as much Wholeness as anything else...
No Blocks Of Time 😊
It would be nice to redefine consciousness/awareness. Whatever statement is made, including the statement that 'this is everything' there is a knowing of this to be so. This non-verbal knowing is alive with no need for knowledge. This aliveness is sometimes called universal consciousness or awareness. In the Tony Parsons tradition, these terms are denied because of some false conclusions that may arise when using these terms. However, it is silly to maintain that there is no awareness since nothing can be perceived or said without such an aware aliveness. If this alive awareness believes that it is a separate me, then this is one of its expressions. When this expression ceases to function while continuing to express through a mind-body appearance of a human form, then an Andreas Müller happens to keep appearing.
Agreed...and as a result the ‘message’ is made needlessly obscure...as if somehow that in itself ‘apparently’ speaks to its uniqueness and specialness.
@Guard Rail
It is quite evident that even 'apparent' messengers are conditioned by their past listening to other messengers; their words, the beauty of their expressions and also their lack of embracing valid terms and pointers from other traditions. By seeing beyond those shortcomings, the essence shines through these marked messages irrespectively.
Dietrich Lasa sure, I have enjoyed Lisa, Jim, Andreas and Tony very much.
@@DietrichLasa There's no Tony Parsons to be judgemental in regards to his judgements, so there's no need to change them. Only from the perspective of a seperate I ("seeing beyond those shortcomings, the essence shines through"), 'shortcomings' and 'essence' becomes meaningful.
@@curiosity_saved_the_cat Hello Curiosity, In the world of appearances, preferences continue to be expressed by any appearing action figure. Character traits remain active with all their conditioning and shortcomings on all levels of expression, mental, emotional, physical etc. They can be enjoyed ('by no-one'). You, the action figure, rather have a cup of tea with clean water than a cup of tea with dirty water. Is that meaningful? No, but it appears quite sensible. TP (the action figure) is not outside these parameters.
Kiitos Mikko näistä videoista! Pystynkö seuraamaan jostain yhdestä paikkaa milloin Jim Newman tai Andreas Müller tai joku muu vastaava on tulossa Suomeen seuraavan kerran?
Moi Tazka. Jos olet Facebookissa, voit liittyä "Nonduality Meetings" ryhmääni, jossa tiedotetaan sekä live- että online-tapahtumista. Jos et ole Facebookissa, voit silti käydä tsekkaamassa "Advaita Finland" -sivumme, jossa postaukset meidän järjestämistämme tapahtumista:
facebook.com/groups/291960482047122
facebook.com/advaitafinland
I wish sick people would stay home. Is that free will? Glad this is pre Covid.
is what apparently being spoken here the same as agnosticism?
So ... What’s your story?
That is great but hopeless, somebody has been nobody, so there is a way.
Isn,t it?
Why is there a recollection of a story from the speaker Andreas? Why does he smile yet denies himself. Why does he show emotion when he never existed? What inhabits hisness. Why dont psychiatrists figure this out?
Why wouldn't there be a recollection or smiling? The self is an illusion. If the illusion stops happening, why wouldn't the brain still function (memory and facial expressions included)?
@@kidyounot3387 Who cares?
@@kidyounot3387 you realise there is no inherent self when you realise there is no inherent self to realise it
A body smiling is what is happening, apparently.
one light many "lamps"
Why did this recording take place other than it just did?
Why did it not take place in a park for free?
Why did the speaker in Andreas die?( Because he said he died in another video)
What took over Andreas' body? Why is the egoless shell animated? What is the agenda of the egoless speaker that it needs an audience?
It's a type of headless chicken situation it seems.
Am I right?
The animal brain creates actions in the body like it does in everybody. Only the human brain seems to imagine that there's a separate entity there. When this illusion is no longer there, the brain and body keep functioning as they always did (minus the illusion). There's no Andreas and nothing takes over.
“What is” needs no story. Or is no thing, no story. If you can remove the story, you’re left with what is. You are a story. You will always be a story.
I love to listen to these talks. But I feel like I have to say that someone there really needs to blow their nose. There always seems to be a lot of coughing in the background of these videos, too. Distribution of throat lozenges and kleenexes prior to the talks should become routine 😂