Writing the Methodology Chapter of a Qualitative Study by Philip Adu, Ph.D.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
- This presentation is about how to write the methodology chapter of a qualitative study.
To access the PowerPoint slides, please go to: www.slideshare...
To buy Dr. Philip Adu's new book, 'A Step-by-Step Guide to Qualitative Data Coding', please go to Amazon (www.amazon.com...) or Routledge (www.routledge....)
![[TF2] The Russian Bear Trap](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YFNSwz2_rOA/mqdefault.jpg)
Sincerely, this is the best RUclips presentation I ever had on qualitative research. This is very informative, easy to learn for a beginner. It has really assisted me to better understand the qualitative study. Thank you so much, Phil Adu.
You're welcome Ibrahim! Thanks for your compliment! I'm glad that this was helpful.
What do you mean about justifiable for methodology?
You are making a lot of sense. This video allows me to pause and skip back to listen again and I'm happy to be able to do that. I'm attempting to complete this final course, for my degree, from a distance. My Uni is not keeping in touch. I submit work and get no feedback. So here I am trudging on and am so happy to have found this lecture. So Dr. Adu Let's do this!
This presentation is so so well structured, clear and well understood. I was so confused with my research design until I listened to this presentation. Weil done, sir.
I must say its been great finding this tutorial, I am thankful.
Thanks Grace! I'm glad that the presentation was helpful!
This level of clarity is unparalleled! Thank you Dr Adu.
Thank you so much for sharing this. This is the most helpful video i have seen on RUclips. So well explained, I like the patience you gave in explaining and didnt rush through it. Thank you!
Thank you so much for your kind words!!
Very good presentation, informative and easy to follow / understand. This it is a powerful resource for me as a researcher.
Thank you so much, Sir! It was a struggle to understand how to approach the methodology chapter in the thesis until I have seen your presentation! Excellent work! God bless you!
Yes, you are making sense. I have to listen closely, but you're helping me understand more clearly than that of my lecturers at Queen's University.
Highly organizing and finely structured presentation. Thanks, Dr.
Philip Adu
Thank you Yonas!!
I thought I could spend just 10 mins to flip through but I ended up going through the entire details happily. Detailed but worth the time. Thank you.
You're welcome!!
This is right on point and very useful. I now have a clear strategy to continue with my PhD methodology chapter. Thank you so much!
I am so happy to have come across your videos. Thanks Philip!
This presentation helped me astronomically in writing my thesis. It was very informative, easy to follow and thought provoking. Thank you so much!
You're welcome Christina! I'm so glad that it was helpful!
Philip
I am so happy to have come across your videos. They are the best videos on RUclips!
This lecture is pure gold. Thank you!
Best lecture I've watched on this topic. Thanks so much!
NCDE, thank you very much for the presentations. Am about to start data analysis. I find the video on Coding and Categorizing Data by Philip Adu, Ph.D very enlightening
You're welcome Talita!
Great just started watching and immediately can't help but also add my voice or argue that qualitative studies also test hypotheses. Turkey (1977)
He just make it easy to understand in many ways!
Very informative and well explained. Thank you so much for sharing.
You're welcome Siphelele!
Amazing!! Thank you sir, it's a great indepth of knowledge. Very explicit and non-questionnable.
This was really really helpful, thank you Dr Adu.
Thank you so much for making this presentation accessible.
thank you so much i got a perfect score in my chapter 3.
Thank you Andrei! Congratulations!
I enjoyed every part of it! This was an excellent presentation.
thank u so much for you amazing presentation sir, this video is very useful to my research.
You're welcome! I'm glad that it was useful to you!
Clearly explained. Thank you so much. I have really benefitted from this presentation.
Thank you so much for this wonderful presentation. This was very informative and really helped me to understand better. Once again thank you.
You're welcome!!
Best presentation I’m glad I came across it
Thank you Dr. Adu for making this available, it was very helpful!
You're welcome Giovanni!
bro thank u so effin much this really the best presentation to be found on the web..i dnt know why it wasnt the first of suggestions ...i watched too many videos and ddnt understand a thing, but this one is so calm and clear thank you for your effort and time
You're welcome bro! Thank you for your kind words! Also, my new book, 'A Step-by-Step Guide to Qualitative Data Coding' would be very helpful to you. www.routledge.com/A-Step-by-Step-Guide-to-Qualitative-Data-Coding/Adu/p/book/9781138486874
Thank you for your amazing presentation. I am a doctoral student at the University of Texas at Austin and my research topic is Campus Carry. My only research question is: Given their historic marginalization in Texas, how do faculty of color at a Texas HBCU make sense of the intersections of campus carry and racial tensions? I planned to take a phenomenology approach. Now, I am wondering if that will work best and if I should change to a case study or something else. What is your advice? I am taking my last class this semester and I am working on chapter three now. I appreciate your support. Thank you, Syneetra
A great presentation on research methodology.
I am from Nepal. Thanks for your deserving work.
You're welcome!!
Amazingly helpful!
Though this was a year ago, I have to say that I am happy to have found it. If you are still answering questions... I am now working on my qualitative research proposal and I am moving at a snail's pace because I'm not too sure of what I am to do. Is there any information you have that speaks to the proposal phase of the research paper?
I'm glad that this presentation was useful. To access more useful information, click on this link: www.slideshare.net/kontorphilip/presentations
This has been immensely helpful, thank you so much!
You're welcome Christine!!
This video has made my day. Thank You so much Sir. For this beautiful and elaborated video.
I'm glad it was helpful! Thank you for watching!!
This sound very interesting.... I am learning a lot here. Thank you DR
You're welcome Lario!
Very helpful information thank you, Dr. Adu.
You're welcome Mitchell!
very good easy to follow presentation
Thanks, nice one! very informative indeed!
Very informative! Thank you, Dr. Adu!'
Really great tutorial. Thank you! This has really helped my understanding.
I found this a really useful lecture, thank you
You're welcome Olivia!
clear and precise presentation. Thank you very much! I didn't notice that there is sampling in qualitative research because we use sampling to generalize for the population. I think generalization is more of quantitative approach. I wonder if you clarify this. Thank you again!
this is best ...so informative....absolutely great!!!!
Thanks once again, it will also be more useful, if a link to a published qualitative study that reported the presented methodologies was shared. This is to see how it is practically reported in the published articles.
This article would be helpful: 'Resilience Strategies of African American Women Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse: A Qualitative Inquiry' journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0011000012469413
@@methodologyrelatedpresenta3448 Thank you so much
this is so helpful, thank you for posting :)
Thank you so much. This was a gem.
You're welcome Cindy!!
Thank you, Dr. Adu for this very useful information. I'm working on transitional experiences of newly qualified nurses from classroom to practice. Research questions are related to the participants's expectations, challenges and available support systems during their transition. I have decided on a phenomenological qualitative design but the type of phenomenology is my problem now. Kindly help me out.
Great presentation, I just wish the audio/microphone was more clear. Thank you for doing this.
You're welcome! We'll work on the audio next time! Thanks!
This is very useful. I would be really grateful if the three stances could be clarified for me and it would also help if I could be advised whether I am correct to think that all studies contain all three of these stances. We know some reality. We then delve in to literature to study knowledge and based on our values and beliefs we identify our gaps and conduct our study.
Yes, you could view it that way! All studies are informed by philosophical paradigms and
their associated assumptions or stance. In some studies, the paradigm and
assumptions are explicit (meaning the researcher describes the underlying philosophical
paradigm including assumptions that informs the methodology (research design)
of the study). This is mostly done in qualitative studies. For quantitative
studies, the researcher, most of the time, makes the paradigm implicit.
You’re right! Our background, beliefs, and the paradigm we allied with could influence
how we examine knowledge in the literature, identify a gap, and conduct research
to fill the gap.
Thanks Lakshi!
Philip
Thank you Philip.
Wish the audio was a little better however very informative presentation and thoughts from the person behind the video :)
Thanks Tom! We'll work on the audio.
Very resourceful video.
very good presentation
Thank you!
Your content is truly helpful. Thank you!!
Thank you Lucy!
This really helps, Philip, Thanks.
You're welcome Taraka!
Very informative, thank you very much
Thanks Dr Philip
You're welcome Noreen!
hello I am enjoying this presentation very much. Here is my question. Is it possible or should I say sensible to use a phenomenological- narrative approach from a functionalistic perspective?
Really helpful, thank you for making this public
You're welcome!!
This is very helpful.
Thanks Sunmade!!
thanks Sir
Thanks Philip!
It's hard for me to differentiate between purposive and criterion sampling based on the explanation in the video. I've noticed that sources that mention purposive sampling don't mention criterion sampling (and vice versa). Could you explain the difference and where I can find a good source for distinguishing between the two? For example, in my study I specifically am seeking students who are neither high nor low achievers and are from a middle class background. I explain my rationale for doing this and use sources where appropriate, but I need to know the appropriate classification. Thanks!
i learnt something especially how to link the
Well crafted and thank you
You're welcome Amanuel!
Thank you Dr.
You're welcome!
Philip
full of information
Love from Pakistan. Thank you.
Thank you too!!
I am concluding that homogeneous sampling and criterion sampling are the same or highly similar. If your criterion is that respondents should have a mental health disorder doesn't selecting them qualify that as homogeneous sampling since they have similar experience i.e mental health?
I agree! There are similar. However, participants selected based on criterion sampling may not necessarily have similar demographic characteristics.
Thank for sharing this lecture.While I understand how to structure the chapter, I can't seem to find a source to refer to when defining how I chose my paradigm, what is the most relavant source of your lesson?
You're welcome Danilo! The resources below would be helpful:
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Kawulich/publication/257944787_Selecting_a_research_approach_Paradigm_methodology_and_methods/links/56166fc308ae37cfe40910fc/Selecting-a-research-approach-Paradigm-methodology-and-methods.pdf
Philip Adu
Danilo Scaramo is
It would be better if there is research paradigm and conceptual framework
Yes you are making sense bro
How do i get your email address?
Please include more examples.
On the issue of Philosophical assumptions what would these look like when doing a grounded approach?
When it comes to grounded approach, you could work within the following three main assumptions:
1. There are multiple realities
2. Participants' background can influence their views
3. knowledge generated is context bound
Also, this presentation on grounded theory would help: www.slideshare.net/kontorphilip/using-grounded-theory-approach-from-start-to-finish
the if you chose ethnograph which one can one apply
Did you say in chapter 3 you state the research question? What happens to the research questions in chapter one? I will need some clarification and the rational for this.
As you may know, the essence of writing chapter 3 (at the dissertation proposal level) is to tell readers about specific methodology related decisions and actions we would take in the study. Also, since research questions normally influence the selection of a research approach, participants for the study and data collection and analysis strategies, it is important to remind readers about the questions we plan to address. Lastly, the essence of restating the research questions is to help organize the description of their rationale - explaining to readers the reasons why it is important to address the questions. I hope this helps!
Where and how can we fit Action research on your flowchart? Creswell doesn’t seem to talk about action research or PAR.
This will help: www.slideshare.net/kontorphilip/visualizing-an-action-research-process
Another resource: www.slideshare.net/kontorphilip/visualizing-an-action-research-process
35:00 research 's background (self note)
can we add two together?
What goes in methodology
This resource would be help: www.slideshare.net/kontorphilip/writing-the-methodology-chapter-of-your-dissertation
plz help me in my dissertation plz plz
How do I cite this video in Turabian style?
I'm so sorry, I'm not familiar with Turabian style.